Clinical and Genomic-Based Decision Support System to Define the Optimal Timing of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes

PURPOSE

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Several issues must be considered when evaluating the benefits and risks of HSCT for patients with MDS, with the timing of transplantation being a crucial question. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a decision support system to define the optimal timing of HSCT for patients with MDS on the basis of clinical and genomic information as provided by the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied a retrospective population of 7,118 patients, stratified into training and validation cohorts. A decision strategy was built to estimate the average survival over an 8-year time horizon (restricted mean survival time [RMST]) for each combination of clinical and genomic covariates and to determine the optimal transplantation policy by comparing different strategies.

RESULTS

Under an IPSS-M based policy, patients with either low and moderate-low risk benefited from a delayed transplantation policy, whereas in those belonging to moderately high-, high- and very high-risk categories, immediate transplantation was associated with a prolonged life expectancy (RMST). Modeling decision analysis on IPSS-M versus conventional Revised IPSS (IPSS-R) changed the transplantation policy in a significant proportion of patients (15% of patient candidate to be immediately transplanted under an IPSS-R-based policy would benefit from a delayed strategy by IPSS-M, whereas 19% of candidates to delayed transplantation by IPSS-R would benefit from immediate HSCT by IPSS-M), resulting in a significant gain-in-life expectancy under an IPSS-M-based policy (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

These results provide evidence for the clinical relevance of including genomic features into the transplantation decision making process, allowing personalizing the hazards and effectiveness of HSCT in patients with MDS.

Implementation of flow cytometry testing on rare matrix samples: Special considerations and best practices when the sample is unique or difficult to obtain

The publication of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's guideline H62 has provided the flow cytometry community with much-needed guidance on development and validation of flow cytometric assays (CLSI, 2021). It has also paved the way for additional exploration of certain topics requiring additional guidance. Flow cytometric analysis of rare matrices, or unique and/or less frequently encountered specimen types, is one such topic and is the focus of this manuscript. This document is the result of a collaboration subject matter experts from a diverse range of backgrounds and seeks to provide best practice consensus guidance regarding these types of specimens. Herein, we define rare matrix samples in the setting of flow cytometric analysis, address validation implications and challenges with these samples, and describe important considerations of using these samples in both clinical and research settings.

Recommendations for using artificial intelligence in clinical flow cytometry

Flow cytometry is a key clinical tool in the diagnosis of many hematologic malignancies and traditionally requires close inspection of digital data by hematopathologists with expert domain knowledge. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are transferable to flow cytometry and have the potential to improve efficiency and prioritization of cases, reduce errors, and highlight fundamental, previously unrecognized associations with underlying biological processes. As a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders, we review a range of critical considerations for appropriately applying AI to clinical flow cytometry, including use case identification, low and high risk use cases, validation, revalidation, computational considerations, and the present regulatory frameworks surrounding AI in clinical medicine. In particular, we provide practical guidance for the development, implementation, and suggestions for potential regulation of AI-based methods in the clinical flow cytometry laboratory. We expect these recommendations to be a helpful initial framework of reference, which will also require additional updates as the field matures.

Translating the regulatory landscape of medical devices to create fit-for-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) cytometry solutions

The implementation of medical software and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms into routine clinical cytometry diagnostic practice requires a thorough understanding of regulatory requirements and challenges throughout the cytometry software product lifecycle. To provide cytometry software developers, computational scientists, researchers, industry professionals, and diagnostic physicians/pathologists with an introduction to European Union (EU) and United States (US) regulatory frameworks. Informed by community feedback and needs assessment established during two international cytometry workshops, this article provides an overview of regulatory landscapes as they pertain to the application of AI, AI-enabled medical devices, and Software as a Medical Device in diagnostic flow cytometry. Evolving regulatory frameworks are discussed, and specific examples regarding cytometry instruments, analysis software and clinical flow cytometry in-vitro diagnostic assays are provided. An important consideration for cytometry software development is the modular approach. As such, modules can be segregated and treated as independent components based on the medical purpose and risk and become subjected to a range of context-dependent compliance and regulatory requirements throughout their life cycle. Knowledge of regulatory and compliance requirements enhances the communication and collaboration between developers, researchers, end-users and regulators. This connection is essential to translate scientific innovation into diagnostic practice and to continue to shape the development and revision of new policies, standards, and approaches.

Technical, gating and interpretation recommendations for the partitioning of circulating monocyte subsets assessed by flow cytometry

The monocyte subset partitioning by flow cytometry, known as "monocyte assay," is now integrated into the new classifications as a supporting criterion for CMML diagnosis, if a relative accumulation of classical monocytes above 94% of total circulating monocytes is observed. Here we provide clinical flow cytometry laboratories with technical support adapted for the most commonly used cytometers. Step-by-step explanations of the gating strategy developed on whole peripheral blood are presented while underlining the most common difficulties. In a second part, interpretation recommendations of circulating monocyte partitioning from the dedicated French working group "CytHem-LMMC" are shared as well as the main pitfalls, including false positive and false negative cases. The particular flow-defined inflammatory profile is described and the usefulness of the nonclassical monocyte specific marker, namely slan, highlighted. Examples of reporting to the physician with frequent situations encountered when using the monocyte assay are also presented.

Immune-monitoring of myelodysplastic neoplasms: Recommendations from the i4MDS consortium

Advancements in comprehending myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfolded significantly in recent years, elucidating a myriad of cellular and molecular underpinnings integral to disease progression. While molecular inclusions into prognostic models have substantively advanced risk stratification, recent revelations have emphasized the pivotal role of immune dysregulation within the bone marrow milieu during MDS evolution. Nonetheless, immunotherapy for MDS has not experienced breakthroughs seen in other malignancies, partly attributable to the absence of an immune classification that could stratify patients toward optimally targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. A pivotal obstacle to establishing "immune classes" among MDS patients is the absence of validated accepted immune panels suitable for routine application in clinical laboratories. In response, we formed International Integrative Innovative Immunology for MDS (i4MDS), a consortium of multidisciplinary experts, and created the following recommendations for standardized methodologies to monitor immune responses in MDS. A central goal of i4MDS is the development of an immune score that could be incorporated into current clinical risk stratification models. This position paper first consolidates current knowledge on MDS immunology. Subsequently, in collaboration with clinical and laboratory specialists, we introduce flow cytometry panels and cytokine assays, meticulously devised for clinical laboratories, aiming to monitor the immune status of MDS patients, evaluating both immune fitness and identifying potential immune "risk factors." By amalgamating this immunological characterization data and molecular data, we aim to enhance patient stratification, identify predictive markers for treatment responsiveness, and accelerate the development of systems immunology tools and innovative immunotherapies.

TRBC1 in flow cytometry: Assay development, validation, and reporting considerations

The assessment of T-cell clonality by flow cytometry has long been suboptimal, relying on aberrant marker expression and/or intensity. The introduction of TRBC1 shows much promise for improving the diagnosis of T-cell neoplasms in the clinical flow laboratory. Most laboratories considering this marker already have existing panels designed for T-cell workups and will be determining how best to incorporate TRBC1. We present this comprehensive summary of TRBC1 and supplemental case examples to familiarize the flow cytometry community with its potential for routine application, provide examples of how to incorporate it into T-cell panels, and signal caution in interpreting the results in certain diagnostic scenarios where appropriate.

Comparing malignant monocytosis across the updated WHO and ICC classifications of 2022

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematolymphoid tumors and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of 2022 introduced major changes to the definition of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). To assess its qualitative and quantitative implications for patient care, we started with 3311 established CMML cases (according to WHO 2017 criteria) and included 2130 oligomonocytosis cases fulfilling the new CMML diagnostic criteria. Applying both 2022 classification systems, 356 and 241 of oligomonocytosis cases were newly classified as myelodysplastic (MD)-CMML (WHO and ICC 2022, respectively), most of which were diagnosed as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to the WHO 2017 classification. Importantly, 1.5 times more oligomonocytosis cases were classified as CMML according to WHO 2022 than based on ICC, because of different diagnostic criteria. Genetic analyses of the newly classified CMML cases showed a distinct mutational profile with strong enrichment of MDS-typical alterations, resulting in a transcriptional subgroup separated from established MD and myeloproliferative CMML. Despite a different cytogenetic, molecular, immunophenotypic, and transcriptional landscape, no differences in overall survival were found between newly classified and established MD-CMML cases. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the most comprehensive analysis of routine CMML cases to date, both in terms of clinical characterization and transcriptomic analysis, placing newly classified CMML cases on a disease continuum between MDS and previously established CMML.

The clinical and genomic landscape of patients with DDX41 variants identified during diagnostic sequencing

Deleterious germ line variants in DDX41 are a common cause of genetic predisposition to hematologic malignancies, particularly myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed in a large cohort of sequentially recruited patients with myeloid malignancy, covering DDX41 as well as 30 other genes frequently mutated in myeloid malignancy. Whole genome transcriptome sequencing data was analyzed on a separate cohort of patients with a range of hematologic malignancies to investigate the spectrum of cancer predisposition. Altogether, 5737 patients with myeloid malignancies were studied, with 152 different DDX41 variants detected. Multiple novel variants were detected, including synonymous variants affecting splicing as demonstrated by RNA-sequencing. The presence of a somatic DDX41 variant was highly associated with DDX41 germ line variants in patients with MDS and AML, and we developed a statistical approach to incorporate the co-occurrence of a somatic DDX41 variant into germ line variant classification at a very strong level (as per the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines). Using this approach, the MDS cohort contained 108 of 2865 (3.8%) patients with germ line likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) variants, and the AML cohort 106 of 2157 (4.9%). DDX41 LP/P variants were markedly enriched in patients with AML and MDS compared with those in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, B-cell neoplasm, and T- or B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In summary, we have developed a framework to enhance DDX41 variant curation as well as highlighted the importance of assessment of all types of genomic variants (including synonymous and multiexon deletions) to fully detect the landscape of possible clinically relevant DDX41 variants.

Interplay of TP53 allelic state, blast count, and complex karyotype on survival of patients with AML and MDS

Several clinical and genetic factors impact overall survival (OS) in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including complex karyotype (CK), TP53 allelic state, and blast count. We analyzed the interplay of these factors by performing Cox regression analysis and by determining the frequency of TP53 single-hit (sh) and double-hit (dh) events and OS in MDS (n = 747) with <5% blasts, with ≥5% but <10% blasts, and ≥10% but <20% blasts and AML (n = 772). MDS with <5% blasts showed the best outcome, followed by with ≥5% but <10% blasts, and ≥10% but <20% blasts, and AML (median OS: 75, 54, 27, and 18 months, respectively). The same hierarchy was observed when each subgroup was divided into TP53sh, TP53dh, and without TP53 alterations (alt), revealing a dismal outcome of TP53dh in all subgroups (17, 10, 8, and 1 month[s], respectively). MDS with <5% blasts differed from the other subgroups by showing predominantly TP53sh (76% of TP53alt cases), and by an independent adverse impact of CK on OS (hazard ratio, 5.2; P < .001). The remaining subgroups displayed many similarities, with TP53dh found at high frequencies (67%, 91%, and 71%, respectively) and only TP53alt but not CK independently influencing OS, and TP53dh showing the strongest influence. When the total cohort was split based on TP53 state, only the blast count and not CK had an independent adverse impact on OS in all subgroups. Thus, TP53dh is the strongest prognostic factor, further supporting its integration into risk stratification guidelines and classification as a separate entity. However, the blast count also influences OS independent of TP53 state, whereas CK plays a minor prognostic role.

AML classification in the year 2023: How to avoid a Babylonian confusion of languages

In parallel to the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO 2022), an alternative International Consensus Classification (ICC) has been proposed. To evaluate the impact of the new classifications on AML diagnoses and ELN-based risk classification, we analyzed 717 MDS and 734 AML non-therapy-related patients diagnosed according to the revised 4th WHO edition (WHO 2017) by whole genome and transcriptome sequencing. In both new classifications, the purely morphologically defined AML entities decreased from 13% to 5%. Myelodysplasia-related (MR) AML increased from 22% to 28% (WHO 2022) and 26% (ICC). Other genetically-defined AML remained the largest group, and the abandoned AML-RUNX1 was mainly reclassified as AML-MR (WHO 2022: 77%; ICC: 96%). Different inclusion criteria of AML-CEBPA and AML-MR (i.a. exclusion of TP53 mutated cases according to ICC) were associated with differences in overall survival. In conclusion, both classifications focus on more genetics-based definitions with similar basic concepts and a large degree of agreement. The remaining non-comparability (e.g., TP53 mutated AML) needs additional studies to definitely answer open questions on disease categorization in an unbiased way.

Surface-Initiated Polymerizations Mediated by Novel Germanium-Based Photoinitiators

Since surface-initiated photopolymerization techniques have gained increasing interest within the last decades, the coupling of photoinitiators to surfaces and particles has become an important research topic in material and surface sciences. In terms of surface modification and functionalization, covalently coupled photoinitiators and subsequent photopolymerizations are employed to provide a huge variety of surface properties, such as wettability, stimulus responsive features, antifouling behavior, protein binding, friction control, drug delivery, and many more. For this purpose, numerous type I and type II photoinitiators or other photosensitive moieties have been attached to different substrates so far. In our studies, a convenient and straightforward synthetic protocol to prepare a novel germanium-based photoinitiator (bromo-tris(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)germane) in good yields was developed. The immobilization of this photoinitiator at the surface of silicon wafers and quartz plates was evidenced by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Employing visible-light-triggered surface-initiated polymerization of different functional monomers, including acrylamide, perfluorodecyl acrylate, and fluorescein-o-acrylate, surfaces with various features such as hydrophilic/hydrophobic and fluorescent properties were prepared. This was also achieved in a spatially resolved manner. The polymer layers were characterized by contact angle measurements, UV-vis/fluorescence spectroscopy, spectroscopic ellipsometry, and XPS. The thicknesses of the surface grafted polymer layers ranged between 10 and 126 nm.

Real-World Validation of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

PURPOSE

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous myeloid neoplasms in which a risk-adapted treatment strategy is needed. Recently, a new clinical-molecular prognostic model, the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) was proposed to improve the prediction of clinical outcome of the currently available tool (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS-R]). We aimed to provide an extensive validation of IPSS-M.

METHODS

A total of 2,876 patients with primary MDS from the GenoMed4All consortium were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

IPSS-M improved prognostic discrimination across all clinical end points with respect to IPSS-R (concordance was 0.81 v 0.74 for overall survival and 0.89 v 0.76 for leukemia-free survival, respectively). This was true even in those patients without detectable gene mutations. Compared with the IPSS-R based stratification, the IPSS-M risk group changed in 46% of patients (23.6% and 22.4% of subjects were upstaged and downstaged, respectively).In patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), IPSS-M significantly improved the prediction of the risk of disease relapse and the probability of post-transplantation survival versus IPSS-R (concordance was 0.76 v 0.60 for overall survival and 0.89 v 0.70 for probability of relapse, respectively). In high-risk patients treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA), IPSS-M failed to stratify individual probability of response; response duration and probability of survival were inversely related to IPSS-M risk.Finally, we tested the accuracy in predicting IPSS-M when molecular information was missed and we defined a minimum set of 15 relevant genes associated with high performance of the score.

CONCLUSION

IPSS-M improves MDS prognostication and might result in a more effective selection of candidates to HSCT. Additional factors other than gene mutations can be involved in determining HMA sensitivity. The definition of a minimum set of relevant genes may facilitate the clinical implementation of the score.

Artificial intelligence in hematological diagnostics: Game changer or gadget?

The future of clinical diagnosis and treatment of hematologic diseases will inevitably involve the integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems into routine practice to support the hematologists' decision making. Several studies have shown that AI-based models can already be used to automatically differentiate cells, reliably detect malignant cell populations, support chromosome banding analysis, and interpret clinical variants, contributing to early disease detection and prognosis. However, even the best tool can become useless if it is misapplied or the results are misinterpreted. Therefore, in order to comprehensively judge and correctly apply newly developed AI-based systems, the hematologist must have a basic understanding of the general concepts of machine learning. In this review, we provide the hematologist with a comprehensive overview of various machine learning techniques, their current implementations and approaches in different diagnostic subfields (e.g., cytogenetics, molecular genetics), and the limitations and unresolved challenges of the systems.

Identification of a specific immunophenotype associated with a consistent pattern of genetic mutations including SRFS2 and gene expression profile in MDS

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of diseases classified by comprehensive diagnostics. Identification of homogeneous subgroups is desirable to understand differences in clinical course and to develop targeted treatment approaches. We identified a specific CD11b/CD16 expression pattern in granulocytes associated with reduced CD45 expression in myeloid progenitor cells (MPC) in MDS cases and assessed its genetic background by whole genome (WGS) and whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS).

METHODS

The cohort consisted of 32 MDS cases with the specific aberrant immunophenotype. Since all these 32 cases were found to be SRSF2 mutated additional 51 SRSF2 mutated MDS cases without this specific immunophenotype were selected as controls. For all cases WGS and WTS were performed.

RESULTS

The immunophenotype newly identified in SRSF2 mutated MDS patients is characterized (1) by a specific maturation pattern, i.e. an increase of CD11b expression without CD16 expression followed by an increase in CD16 expression without further CD11b expression and (2) by only dim CD45 expression of MPC. STAG2 mutations were exclusively found in MDS cases with the specific immunophenotype (17/32, 53% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Hence, >50% of cases with the specific immunophenotype were characterized by co-mutations in SRSF2 and STAG2. In addition, cluster analysis revealed a specific gene expression profile of such cases.

CONCLUSION

We here for the first time describe a specific immunophenotype which defines MDS cases with SRSF2 mutations and a consistent and specific mutational and gene expression profile. This comprehensive data warrants analysis of further such cases to assess the feasibility of defining a new sub-entity of MDS.

Novel causative variants of VEXAS in UBA1 detected through whole genome transcriptome sequencing in a large cohort of hematological malignancies

UBA1 is an X-linked gene and encodes an ubiquitin-activating enzyme. Three somatic mutations altering the alternative start codon (M41) in UBA1 in hematopoietic precursor cells have recently been described, resulting in a syndrome of severe inflammation, cytopenias, and the presence of intracellular vacuoles in hematopoietic precursors - termed VEXAS syndrome, a predominantly male disease. Here we present a patient with clinical features of VEXAS who harbored two novel somatic variants in UBA1 (I894S and N606I). To better understand the clinical relevance and biological consequences of non-M41 (UBA1^non-M41) variants, we analyzed the whole genome and transcriptome data of 4168 patients with hematological malignancies and detected an additional 16 UBA1^non-M41 putative somatic variants with a clear sex-bias in patients with myeloid malignancies. Patients diagnosed with myeloid malignancies carrying UBA1^non-M41 putative somatic variants either had vacuoles or immunodysregulatory symptoms. Analysis of the transcriptome confirmed neutrophil activation in VEXAS patients compared to healthy controls but did not result in a specific transcriptomic signature of UBA1^M41 patients in comparison with MDS patients. In summary, we have described multiple putative novel UBA1^non-M41 variants in patients with various hematological malignancies expanding the genomic spectrum of VEXAS syndrome.