Design and Rationale of the Outcomes Database to Prospectively Assess the Changing Therapy Landscape in Renal Cell Carcinoma Registry: A Multi-institutional, Prospective Study of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Introduction and hypotheses

The Outcomes Database to prospectivelY aSSEss the changing TherapY landscape in Renal Cell Carcinoma (ODYSSEY RCC) Registry is a large, nationally representative prospective registry of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) that aims to provide a real-world picture of longitudinal clinical management and patient experiences that impact clinical outcomes. The primary goal of this study is to understand the cancer management and health-related quality of life in patients with mRCC in routine real-world clinical practice in the USA.

Design

This is an observational, phase 4 study with planned enrollment of up to 800 patients aged ≥19 yr with mRCC in the USA. Patients will be identified through electronic health record (EHR) data from the PCORnet network of sites for care received at collaborating sites. A unique aspect of the study is the multiple data sources that will be linked to the EHR data. These include: (1) Medicare claims data, (2) laboratory results, (3) tissue specimens, (4) radiographic images, and (5) patient-reported outcomes, physicians' treatment selection, and discontinuation surveys.

Protocol overview

We created a novel data resource that can inform patient care. Investigators have the opportunity to use these to study novel research questions after submitting an ancillary proposal and upon approval of the executive committee. Limitations include the potential for selection bias, residual confounding, and missing information.

Summary

The ODYSSEY Registry will provide an advanced data resource that can examine numerous clinical questions related to patient and physician choice, and support methodological research related to omics and artificial intelligence.

Patient summary

Cancer medications and treatments are changing rapidly. Collecting data on real-world clinical practice and patient-answered questionnaires will help us better understand cancer management and health-related quality of life while receiving metastatic renal cell carcinoma-specific treatment.

First-Line Immune Combination Therapies for Nonclear Cell Versus Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Multicenter Data From Germany

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to compare treatment outcomes of clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) versus non-ccmRCC (nccmRCC) patients who received first-line immune combination therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Within our retrospective multi-institutional consecutive database of eight tertiary-care centers, we identified mRCC patients treated with first-line immune combination therapies between 11/2017 and 12/2022. Using log-rank analysis and multivariable Cox regression, we tested for differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of nccmRCC versus ccmRCC patients. Covariables consisted of age at diagnosis, sex, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk groups, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and sarcomatoid feature.

RESULTS

Of 289 study patients, 39 (13%) patients harbored nccmRCC. Median OS was 37 months versus not reached for ccmRCC versus nccmRCC patients (P = .6). Median PFS was 13 versus 15 months (P = .9). Multivariable Cox regression models did not identify nccmRCC as an independent predictor of higher overall mortality in mRCC patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.23; P = .6) or a higher progression rate (HR: 1.0; P = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

In our real-world multi-institutional study, no differences in OS and PFS between ccmRCC and nccmRCC patients receiving first-line immune combination treatment were observed, even after adjustment for important patient and tumor characteristics. More prospective trials in nccmRCC patients are needed.

The gut microbiome and dietary metabolites in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

The gut microbiome is interlinked with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and its response to systemic treatment. Mounting data suggests that certain elements of the gut microbiome may correlate with improved outcomes. New generation sequencing techniques and advanced bioinformatic data curation are accelerating the investigation of specific markers and metabolites that could predict treatment response. A variety of new therapeutic strategies, such as fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotic supplements, and dietary interventions, are currently being developed to modify the gut microbiome and improve anticancer therapies in patients with RCC. This review discusses the preliminary evidence indicating the role of the microbiome in cancer treatment, the techniques and tools necessary for its proper study and some of the current forms with which the microbiome can be modulated to improve patient outcomes.

First-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of efficacy and safety

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared.

RESULTS

The matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33-NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43-NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7-25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13-NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

In a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.

Final Analysis of a Noninterventional Study on Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of the German Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors (IAG-N)

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany.

INTERVENTIONS

Cabozantinib was administered as a standard of care.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

About 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment.

Long-term responders to nivolumab in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a sub-analysis of meet-URO15 study

BACKGROUND

Although nivolumab prolongs overall survival (OS) in pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), underlining clinical and biological features of long-term responses are still to be determined. This study aims to investigate clinical and pathological characteristics of mRCC patients who achieved long-term responses during nivolumab treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on mRCC patients receiving nivolumab as second or further therapy line between May 2016 and January 2019 in 34 Italian Oncology Centres. Outcome assessments and logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors influencing long-term responses.

RESULTS

A total of 571 patients with a median age of 61 years (range 17-85) were included in the analysis. With a median follow-up of 22.1 (1.0-89.0) months, 23.1% of patients were 2-year progression-free on treatment with nivolumab, hence they were categorized as long-term responders. Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, and histology, were similar between long- and short-term responders. Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 80% was significantly associated with long-term response (p = 0.02), while bone metastases (p = 0.03), International mRCC Database Consortium intermediate-poor risk (p < 0.01) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio ≥ 3.2 (p = 0.02) were associate with short-term responses. Long-term responders exhibited a median progression-free survival of 55.0 months versus 4.0 months of the short-term responders. The median OS was not reached in long-term responders while it was 17.0 months for short*term responders.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis sheds light on factors associated with long-term response to nivolumab in mRCC. Understanding these clinical features will be essential for selecting patients who may mostly benefit from immunotherapy.

Optimal sequential therapy using tyrosine kinase inhibitors as the first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A nationwide multicenter study

Objective

The purpose of the study was to identify the best sequence of therapy beginning with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the first-line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and rates of discontinuation and adverse effects during the treatment period.

Methods

This is a retrospective, nationwide multicenter study of patients with mRCC after diagnosis at 10 different tertiary medical centers in Korea from January 1992 to December 2017. We focused on patients at either "favorable" or "intermediate" risk according to the International mRCC Database Consortium criteria, and they were followed up (median 335 days). Finally, a total of 1409 patients were selected as the study population. We generated a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for covariates, and the different therapy schemes were statistically tested in terms of OS as well as PFS. In addition, frequencies of discontinuation and adverse events were compared among the therapy schemes.

Results

Of the primary patterns of treatment sequences (24 sequences), "sunitinib-pazopanib" and "sunitinib-everolimus-immunotherapy" showed the most beneficial results in both OS and PFS with significantly lower hazards than "sunitinib", which is the most commonly treated agent in Korea. Considering that the "TKI-TKI" structure showed relatively higher discontinuation rates with higher adverse effects, the overall beneficial sequence would be "sunitinib-everolimus-immunotherapy".

Conclusion

Among several sequential therapy starting with TKIs, "sunitinib-everolimus- immunotherapy" was found to be the best scheme for mRCC patients with "favorable" or "intermediate" risks.

International multicenter real-world REGistry for patients with metastatic renAL cell carcinoma - Meet-URO 33 study (REGAL study)

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, different therapeutic options are available for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Immuno-combinations are the standard first-line therapy in all mRCC patients regardless of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, even though TKI monotherapy is still a therapeutic option in selected patients. However, comparisons between the different first-line treatment strategies are lacking and few real-world data are available in this setting. For this reason, the regimen choice represents an important issue in clinical practice and the optimal treatment sequence remains unclear.

METHODS

The REGAL study is a multicentric prospective observational study enrolling mRCC patients treated with first-line systemic therapy according to clinical practice in a real-world setting. A retrospective cohort of mRCC patients who received first-line systemic therapy from the 1st of January 2021 will also be included. The primary objective is to identify potential prognostic and predictive factors that could help guide the treatment choice; secondary objectives included the assessment of the prognostic performance of the novel prognostic Meet-URO score (IMDC score + neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio + bone metastases) compared with the IMDC score and the comparison between treatment strategies according to response and survival outcomes and toxicity profile.

DISCUSSION

Considering the high number of therapeutic first-line strategies available for mRCC, the identification of clinical prognostic and predictive factors to candidate patients to a preferable systemic therapy is still an unmet clinical need. The Meet-URO 33 study aims to provide a large-scale real-world database on mRCC patients, to identify the clinical predictive and prognostic factors and the different performances between the ICI-based combinations according to response, survival and toxicity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CESC IOV 2023-78.

Real-world Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with or Without Sarcomatoid Features Treated with First-line Systemic Therapies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients have been reported to have better outcomes when treated with immunotherapies (IO) compared to targeted therapies (TT). This study aims to evaluate the impact of first-line systemic therapies on survival of mRCC patients with or without sarcomatoid features using real-world data.

METHODS

Metastatic RCC patients of International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate or high risk, diagnosed from January 2011 to December 2022, treated with first-line systemic therapies, and with histological documentation of the presence or absence of sarcomatoid features in nephrectomy specimens were identified using the Canadian Kidney Cancer information system. Patients were classified by initial treatment: (1) targeted therapy (TT) used alone or (2) immunotherapy (IO)-based systemic therapies used in combination of either IO-IO or IO-TT. The inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to balance for covariates. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the impact of initial treatment received on overall survival (OS).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 1202 eligible patients, 791 were treated with TT and 411 with IO combinations. Of the patients, 76% were male, and the majority (91%) had a nephrectomy before systemic therapy. In nonsarcomatoid patients (639 TT and 320 IO patients), treatment with IO was associated with improved OS compared with patients treated with TT (median of 72 vs 48 mo, hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.80, objective response rate [ORR] of 38.5% for IO and 23.5% for TT). In sarcomatoid patients (152 TT and 91 IO patients), treatment with IO was associated with improved OS (median of 48 vs 18 mo, HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.64, ORR of 49.5% for IO and 13.8% for TT). Similar results were observed in patients with synchronous metastatic disease only.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

IO treatment was associated with improved survival in mRCC patients. The magnitude of benefit is increased in patients with sarcomatoid mRCC, consequently, identifying the sarcomatoid status early on could help healthcare providers make a better treatment decision.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients of International mRCC Database Consortium intermediate and high risk, diagnosed from January 2011 to December 2022, treated with first-line systemic therapies, and with histological documentation of the presence or absence of sarcomatoid features in nephrectomy specimens were identified using the Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis). In this study, treatment with immunotherapy was associated to an improved survival and response rates for mRCC patients with and without sarcomatoid features. The magnitude of benefit is increased in patients with sarcomatoid mRCC.

Early kinetics of C-reactive protein as prognosticator for survival in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer under first-line therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE

This study investigated the prognostic potential of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and early CRP kinetics in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) under first-line (1L) therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI).

METHODS/PATIENTS

Analyses were performed retrospectively in a cohort of 61 mRCC patients under CPI-based 1L therapy. Patients were stratified based on baseline CRP (< 10 vs ≥ 10 mg/l) and CRP change within the initial three months of CPI therapy (normal: baseline < 10 mg/l, normalized: baseline ≥ 10 mg/l and nadir < 10 mg/l, non-normalized: baseline and nadir ≥ 10 mg/l). Finally, the association of baseline CRP and CRP change with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Baseline CRP was not significantly associated with both PFS (p = 0.666) and OS (p = 0.143). Following stratification according to early CRP kinetics, 23, 25 and 13 patients exhibited normal, normalized and non-normalized CRP levels, respectively. Patients with normal and normalized CRP had a markedly prolonged PFS (p = 0.091) and OS (p = 0.008) compared to patients with non-normalized CRP. Consequently, significantly better PFS (p = 0.031) and OS (p = 0.002) were observed for the combined normal-normalized group. In multivariate analysis including ECOG and IMDC risk, normalized CRP kinetics alone or in combination with the normal group was identified as significant independent risk factor for OS, whereas a statistical trend was observed for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study emphasizes the prognostic potential of early CRP kinetics in CPI-treated mRCC. As a standard laboratory parameter, CRP can be easily implemented into clinical routine to facilitate therapy monitoring.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and impaired kidney function

INTRODUCTION

Patients with renal insufficiency, usually defined as those with creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min, were excluded from pivotal clinical trials, especially in studies involving nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) stratified according to creatinine clearance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into two categories according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); the first category (C1) included patients with eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the second category (C2) included those with eGFR ≥ 40 mL/min/1.73 m2.

RESULTS

Of the 95 patients enrolled, 1. group included 26 patients (27.4%) and 2. group included 69 patients (72.6%). None of the pts in category 1 were on hemodialysis. Overall incidence of adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (P = .469). The overall response rate ORR was 50% in the first group and 42.0% in the second group (P = .486). Median overall survival (OS) was longer with 23.3 months in the 2. group versus 11 months in the 1. group (P = .415).

CONCLUSION

Renal insufficiency is a common problem in patients with advanced renal cancer since they often undergo nephrectomy and their renal function may also worsen while receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We found that there is no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of nivolumab treatment between two groups. Nivolumab appears to be a safe and effective agent in patients with renal impairment.

Does the Timing of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Impact Outcomes? Analysis of REMARCC Registry Data for Patients Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Versus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Background and objective

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been called into question on the basis of clinical trial data from the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. Comparative analyses of CN for patients treated with immuno-oncology (IO) versus TKI agents are sparse. Our objective was to compare CN timing and outcomes among patients who received TKI versus IO therapy.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CN using data from the REMARCC (Registry of Metastatic RCC) database. The cohort was divided into TKI versus IO first-line therapy groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes included cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors predictive for ACM and CSM. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze 5-yr overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) with stratification by primary systemic therapy and timing in relation to CN.

Key findings and limitations

We analyzed data for 189 patients (148 TKI + CN, 41 IO +CN; median follow-up 23.2 mo). Multivariable analysis revealed that a greater number of metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; p = 0.015), greater primary tumor size (HR 1.10; p = 0.043), TKI receipt (HR 2.36; p = 0.015), and initiation of systemic therapy after CN (HR 1.49; p = 0.039) were associated with worse ACM. A greater number of metastases at diagnosis (HR 1.07; p = 0.011), greater primary tumor size (HR 1.12; p = 0.018), TKI receipt (HR 5.43; p = 0.004), and initiation of systemic therapy after CN (HR 2.04; p < 0.001) were associated with worse CSM. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed greater 5-yr rates for OS (51% vs 27%; p < 0.001) and CSS (83% vs 30%; p < 0.001) for IO +CN versus TKI + CN. This difference persisted in a subgroup analysis for patients with intermediate or poor risk, with 5-yr OS rates of 50% for IO + CN versus 30% for TKI + CN (p < 0.001). A subanalysis stratified by CN timing revealed better 5-yr rates for OS (50% vs 30%; p = 0.042) and CSS (90% vs 30%, p = 0.019) for delayed CN after IO therapy, but not after TKI therapy.

Conclusions and clinical implications

For patients who underwent CN, systemic therapy before CN was associated with better outcomes. In addition, IO therapy was associated with better survival outcomes in comparison to TKI therapy. Our findings question the applicability of clinical trial data from the TKI era to CN in the IO era for mRCC.

Patient summary

For patients with metastatic kidney cancer treated with surgery, better survival outcomes were observed for those who also received immunotherapy in comparison to therapy targeting specific proteins in the body (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs). Immunotherapy or TKI treatment resulted in better outcomes if it was received before rather than after surgery.

Patient's self-reported quality of life as a prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma initially treated with TKI: nomogram proposal

BACKGROUND

Numerous prognostic factors have been described for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). There are nomograms to assist in clinical decision-making and inform patients of their disease progression. However, they have a limited capacity and moderate concordance rates. Performance status (PS) is one of the most widely used prognostic factors and most closely related to overall survival (OS), but this is a subjective assessment based solely on the clinician's opinion. Patients must be at the center of care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have shown benefits but are not widespread in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

We analyzed 78 consecutive patients diagnosed with mRCC who initiated treatment at our institution between September 2012 and September 2019. We performed a descriptive analysis of the sample's baseline characteristics and the NCCN FKSI 19 questionnaire. We also conducted a survival analysis.

RESULTS

The baseline FKSI 19 score demonstrates its prognostic potential, HR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.97). Our prognostic model would include: FKSI < 58 (HR 3.61 95% CI 1.97-6.61), anemia, thrombocytosis, non-clear cell histology, and metastatic hepatic involvement. AUC 0.86 (95%CI 0.77-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Although it would need external validation, the proposed nomogram could be an alternative to other previously described models. The NCCN FKSI 19 baseline score could replace the clinician's subjective determination of PS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Immune-related adverse events associated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the realm of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized treatment paradigms. Despite their effectiveness, the comprehensive safety profile of these therapies remains inadequately explored. This network meta-analysis aims to comparing the safety profiles of ICI-based treatments in mRCC, offering vital insights that could lead to the optimization of treatment strategies and improvement of patient care.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Schola, OpenGrey and Scopus through November 1, 2023. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias version 2 tool.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 5976 patients were included for data analysis. The risk of bias results showed that all RCTs were considered "some concerns". The probability of hypothyroidism (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 0.981), hyperthyroidism (SUCRA = 0.983) and dermatologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (SUCRA = 0.955) in the Nivolumab + Cabozantinib ranked the first. The Avelumab + Axitinib had the highest incidence of adrenal insufficiency (AI) (SUCRA = 0.976), hepatitis (SUCRA = 0.937) and colitis (SUCRA = 0.864). The Nivolumab + Ipilimumab exhibited the highest incidence of pneumonitis (SUCRA = 0.755). Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib had the highest incidence of nephritic irAEs (SUCRA = 0.788). The ICI-based group showed a higher incidence of hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, dermatologic irAEs, hepatitis and nephritic irAEs than sunitinib. However, the confidence in the evidence regarding the impact of ICI-based treatments on AI, pneumonia, and colitis remains limited.

CONCLUSION

The analysis focused on the probability of irAEs occurrence in each system when mRCC patients were treated with different ICI-based therapies, potentially offering significant value for guiding clinical prevention, early diagnosis, and management of irAEs. The limitations of the study included the potential heterogeneity and low certainty of part of the evidence.

A phase I trial of autologous RAK cell immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains a challenge worldwide. Here, we introduced a phase I trial of autologous RAK cell therapy in patients with mRCC whose cancers progressed after prior systemic therapy. Although RAK cells have been used in clinic for many years, there has been no dose-escalation study to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

We conducted a phase I trial with a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design to investigate the dose-related safety and efficacy of RAK cells in patients with mRCC whose cancers have failed to response to systemic therapy (ChiCTR1900021334).

RESULTS

Autologous RAK cells, primarily composed of CD8+ T and NKT cells, were infused intravenously to patients at a dose of 5 × 109, 1 × 1010 or 1.5 × 1010 cells every 28 days per cycle. Our study demonstrated general safety of RAK cells in a total of 12 patients. Four patients (33.3%) showed tumor shrinkage, two of them achieved durable partial responses. Peripheral blood analysis showed a significant increase in absolute counts of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells after infusion, with a greater fold change observed in naive CD8+ T cells (CD8+CD45RA+). Higher peak values of IL-2 and IFN-γ were observed in responders after RAK infusion.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that autologous RAK cell immunotherapy is safe and has clinical activity in previously treated mRCC patients. The improvement in peripheral blood immune profiling after RAK cell infusion highlights its potential as a cancer treatment. Further investigation is necessary to understand its clinical utility.

Impact of Synchronous versus Metachronous Metastasis on Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-based Combinations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The impact of time of metastasis onset with respect toprimary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnosis on survival outcomes is not well characterized in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations. Herein, we assessed differences in clinical outcomes between synchronous and metachronous metastatic RCC (mRCC).

METHODS

Data for patients with mRCC treated with first-line ICI-based combination therapies between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized as having synchronous metastasis if present within 3 mo of RCC diagnosis; metachronous metastasis was defined as metastasis >3 mo after primary diagnosis. Time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and the disease control rate (DCR) were assessed.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Our analysis included 223 eligible patients (126 synchronous and 97 metachronous). Median TTF did not significantly differ between the synchronous and metachronous groups (9 vs 19.8 mo; p = 0.063). Median OS was significantly shorter in the synchronous group (28.0 vs 50.9 mo; p = 0.001). Similarly, patients with synchronous metachronous metastasis (58.7% vs. 78.4%; p = 0.002). On multivariable analyses, synchronous metastasis remained independently associated with worse OS and DCR.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In this hypothesis-generating study, patients with mRCC with synchronous metastasis who were treated with first-line ICI-based combinations have a poorer OS and worse DCR than those with metachronous mRCC. If these results are externally validated, time to metastasis could be included in prognostic models for mRCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our study demonstrates that patients treated with current first-line immunotherapies, who present with metastasis at the initial diagnosis of kidney cancer have worse overall survival compared to those who develop metastasis later. These results can help physicians and patients understand life expectancy.

External validation of a red cell-based blood prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations

Immunotherapy combinations with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had significantly improved outcomes of patients with mRCC. Predictive and prognostic factors are crucial to improve patients' counseling and management. The present study aimed to externally validate the prognostic value of a previously developed red cell-based score, including hemoglobin (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW), in patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations (TKI plus ICI or ICI plus ICI). We performed a sub-analysis of a multicentre retrospective observational study (ARON-1 project) involving patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the correlation between the red cell-based score and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression were used to estimate the correlation between the score and the objective response rate (ORR). The prognostic impact of the red cell-based score on PFS and OS was confirmed in the whole population regardless of the immunotherapy combination used [median PFS (mPFS): 17.4 vs 8.2 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.94; median OS (mOS): 42.0 vs 17.3 months, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.92; p < 0.001 for both]. We validated the prognostic significance of the red cell-based score in patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. The score is easy to use in daily clinical practice and it might improve patient counselling.

The Selection for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (SCREEN) Score: Improving Surgical Risk Stratification by Integrating Common Radiographic Features

BACKGROUND

Careful patient selection is critical when considering cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but few studies have investigated the prognostic value of radiologic features that measure tumor burden.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a prognostic model to improve CN selection with integration of common radiologic features with known prognostic factors associated with mortality in the first year following surgery.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data were analyzed for consecutive patients with mRCC treated with upfront CN at five institutions from 2006 to 2017. Univariable and multivariable models were used to evaluate radiographic features and known risk factors for associations with overall survival. Relevant factors were used to create the SCREEN model and compared to the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model for predictive accuracy and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 914 patients with mRCC were treated with upfront CN during the study period. Seven independently predictive variables were used in the SCREEN score: three or more metastatic sites, total metastatic tumor burden ≥5 cm, bone metastasis, systemic symptoms, low serum hemoglobin, low serum albumin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ≥4. Predictive accuracy measured as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.76 for the SCREEN score and 0.55 for the IMDC model. Decision curve analysis showed that the SCREEN model was useful beyond the IMDC classifier for threshold first-year mortality probabilities between 15% and 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCREEN score had higher predictive accuracy for first-year mortality compared to the IMDC scheme in a multi-institutional cohort and may be used to improve CN selection.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study provides a model to improve selection of patients with metastatic kidney cancer who may benefit from surgical removal of the primary kidney tumor. We found that radiographic measurements of the tumor burden predicted the risk of death in the first year after surgery. The model can be used to improve decision-making by these patients and their physicians.

Impact of Metastatic Site in Favorable-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib or Pazopanib

BACKGROUND

Although in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with intermediate and poor risk the benefit of combination strategies versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been ascertained, in those with favorable risk data are ambiguous. Herein, we investigated the impact of number and type of metastatic site in patients with favorable risk to contribute to the best therapeutic choice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Multicenter data regarding patients with favorable risk mRCC carcinoma receiving first-line TKIs, sunitinib or pazopanib, were retrospectively collected. We divided our population into 2 groups based on the number of metastatic sites and analyzed its impact on tumor response and efficacy outcome. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate efficacy outcomes and the log-rank test to examine differences between subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with a median age of 69 years were included in the final analysis. Patients with 1 metastatic site, compared with patients with > 1 site, had a significantly longer overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 66 months) and a trend, although not statistically significant, of better progression-free survival (PFS) (31 vs. 17 months). In patients with 1 metastatic site, liver involvement was correlated with worse PFS and OS at the univariate analysis (P = .01) and was confirmed as independent poor prognostic factor for PFS at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we reported a longer OS in favorable risk mRCC patients receiving TKI with only 1 metastatic site. Nevertheless, in patients with a single metastatic site, hepatic involvement correlated with worse PFS compared to other metastatic sites.

First-line dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies versus combination therapies comprising immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a comparative analysis of the effectiveness using real-world data

BACKGROUND

There are few comparative studies on dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e., IO-IO) and combination therapies comprising ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in real-world settings.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data of 175 patients with IMDC intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC; as first-line therapy, 103 received IO-IO, and 72 received IO-TKI. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to balance patients' backgrounds in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups.

RESULTS

Based on the IPTW analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (median: 15.6 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.0386). In contrast, overall survival was not different between groups (median: 46.7 vs. 49.0 months; p = 0.465). Although the IPTW-adjusted objective response rate was not significantly different (51.2% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.359), the progressive disease rate as the best overall response was lower in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (3.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the safety profile, the treatment interruption rate was higher in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (70.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.005). In contrast, the IO-IO group had a higher corticosteroid administration rate (43.3% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IO-TKI therapy exhibited superior effectiveness over IO-IO therapy in terms of PFS improvement and immediate disease progression prevention and was associated with a higher risk of treatment interruption and a lower risk of needing corticosteroids.

Identification of genomic drivers for the therapeutic response of Cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Cabozantinib (CAB) as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors is used for systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, little is known about predictors of treatment response to CAB. For this reason, known genomic drivers were examined to identify potential predictors of treatment response with CAB.

METHODS

Twenty mRCC patients receiving monotherapy (≥ first-line) with CAB were prospectively included. DNA was extracted from archived primary tumors or metastatic tissue. Targeted DNA sequencing was performed using a gene panel including 328 genes (QIAseq Targeted DNA V3 Panel, Qiagen). The variant evaluation was performed using Varsome. The endpoints were treatment-failure-free-survival (TFFS) to CAB.

RESULTS

26% of patients received systemic RCC treatment as the primary option. Six patients were treated with CAB in first-line (1L) and 12 patients in ≥ 2L. The median follow-up after initiation of systemic treatment was 26.7 months (mo). The PBRM1 (7 alleles), SETD2 (7 alleles), VHL (11 alleles), and CHEK2 (14 alleles) genes were most frequently altered. The median time to TFFS was 10.5 mo (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-14.7 mo). There was a longer treatment response to CAB in patients with alterations of the SETD2 gene (SETD2 alteration median TFFS not reached vs. no SETD2 alterations 8.4 mo (95% CI 5.2-11.6 mo); p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Pathogenic variant genes may indicate treatment response to systemic therapy in mRCC. Patients with alterations of the SETD2 gene show longer responses to CAB treatment.

Surgical outcomes of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients receiving systemic immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The use of systemic immune checkpoint blockade before surgery is increasing in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, however, the safety and feasibility of performing consolidative cytoreductive nephrectomy after the administration of systemic therapy are not well described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing nephrectomy was performed using our prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who received preoperative systemic immunotherapy were identified, and the risk of postoperative complications were compared to those who underwent surgery without upfront systemic treatment. Perioperative characteristics and surgical complications within 90 days following surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, we identified 220 patients who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy from April 2015 to December 2022, of which 46 patients (21%) received systemic therapy before undergoing surgery. Unadjusted rates of surgical complications included 20% (n = 35) in patients who did not receive upfront systemic therapy and 20% (n = 9) in those who received upfront systemic immunotherapy. In our propensity score analysis, there was no statistically significant association between receipt of upfront immunotherapy and 90-day surgical complications [odds ratio (OR): 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-5.14; P = 0.3]. This model, however, demonstrated an association between receipt of upfront immunotherapy and an increased odds of requiring a blood transfusion [OR: 4.53, 95% CI: 1.83-11.7; P = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, there was no significant difference in surgical complications among patients who received systemic therapy before surgery compared to those who did not receive upfront systemic therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy is safe and with low rates of complications following the use of systemic therapy.

Differences in Survival of Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma According to Partial vs. Radical Cytoreductive Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether previously reported other-cause mortality (OCM) advantage of partial cytoreductive nephrectomy (PCN) vs. radical cytoreductive nephrectomy (RCN) still applies to contemporary clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2019) to identify ccmRCC patients treated with PCN and RCN. Temporal trends of PCN rates within the SEER database were tabulated. After propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots depicted 5-year OCM and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of PCN and RCN patients. Multivariable Cox regression models tested for differences between PCN vs. RCN.

RESULTS

Of 5149 study patients, 237 (5%) underwent PCN vs. 4912 (95%) RCN. In the SEER database 2004 to 2019, rates of PCN in ccmRCC patients increased from 3.0% to 8.0% (estimated annual percent change [EAPC]: 3.0%; P = .04). After PSM, 5-year OCM rates were 2.4 vs. 7.5% for respectively PCN vs. RCN patients (P = .036). 5-year CSM rates were 50.8 vs. 53.6% for respectively PCN and RCN patients (P = .57). In multivariable Cox regression models, PCN was associated with lower OCM (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.84; P = .02) but did not affect CSM rates (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.76-1.29; P = .96).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm the existence of OCM advantage after PCN vs. RCN in contemporary ccmRCC patients.

Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause various immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to evaluate the association between the incidence of irAEs and oncological outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 69 patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy between September 2018 and September 2021 at 4 institutions. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the important factors affecting overall survival (OS) in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy.

RESULTS

During observation with a median follow-up of 9.1 months, the median OS was not reached, while the median progression-free survival was 6.0 months. Patients with irAEs had significantly prolonged OS and progression-free survival than those without irAEs (p = .012 and .002, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that 3 independent factors, including C-reactive protein (CRP), irAEs, and performance status (PS), were significantly associated with OS (p = .04, .02, and .01, respectively). The patients were subsequently divided into 3 groups as follows: group 1, 20 patients with all 3 independent OS predictors; group 2, 18 patients with irAE predictors alone or 2 positive independent OS predictors (irAEs + CRP or irAEs + PS); group 3, 31 patients with 3 negative independent S predictors. OS varied significantly among the 3 groups (p = .004).

CONCLUSION

The appearance of irAEs could predict OS in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as the first-line therapy.