Patient preferences for the provision of NHS medicines helpline services: a discrete choice experiment

Introduction

Patient medicines helpline services (PMHS) can reduce harm and improve medicines adherence and patient satisfaction after hospital discharge. There is little evidence of which PMHS attributes are most important to patients. This would enable PMHS providers to prioritise their limited resources to maximise patient benefit.

Methods

Patient preferences for PMHS attributes were measured using a discrete choice experiment. Seven attributes were identified from past research, documentary analysis and stakeholder consultation. These were used to produce a D-efficient design with two blocks of ten choice sets incorporated into an online survey. Adults in the UK who took more than one medicine were eligible to complete the survey and were recruited via the Research for the Future database. Preferences were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Associations between participant characteristics and preferences were investigated with latent class models.

Results

460 participants completed the survey. The most valued attributes were weekend opening (willingness-to-pay, WTP: £11.20), evening opening (WTP: £8.89), and receiving an answer on the same day (WTP: £9.27). Alternative contact methods, immediate contact with a pharmacist and helpline location were valued less. Female gender and full-time work were associated with variation in preferences. For one latent class containing 27% of participants, PMHS location at the patient's hospital was the most valued attribute.

Discussion

PMHS providers should prioritise extended opening hours and answering questions on the same day. Limitations include a non-representative sample in terms of ethnicity, education and geography, and the exclusion of people without internet access.

Feasibility, Fidelity and Acceptability of a Person-Centred Care Transition Support Intervention for Stroke Survivors: A Non-Randomised Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Care transitions from hospital to home are a critical period for patients and their families, especially after a stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a co-designed care transition support for stroke survivors.

METHODS

A non-randomised controlled feasibility study recruiting patients who had had stroke and who were to be discharged home and referred to a neurorehabilitation team in primary healthcare was conducted. Data on the feasibility of recruitment and fidelity of the intervention were collected continuously during the study with screening lists and checklists. Data on the perceived quality of care transition were collected at 1-week post-discharge with the Care Transition Measure. Data on participant characteristics, disease-related data and outcomes were collected at baseline (hospitalisation), 1 week and 3 months post-discharge. Data on the acceptability of the intervention from the perspective of healthcare professionals were collected at 3 months using the Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Altogether, 49 stroke survivors were included in the study: 28 in the intervention group and 21 in the control group. The recruitment and data collection of patient characteristics, disease-related data, functioning and outcomes were feasible. The fidelity of the intervention differed in relation to the different components of the co-designed care transition support. The intervention was acceptable from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Concerns were raised about the fidelity of the intervention. A positive direction of effects of the intervention on the perceived quality of the care transition was found.

CONCLUSION

The study design, data collection, procedures and intervention were deemed feasible and acceptable. Modifications are needed to improve intervention fidelity by supporting healthcare professionals to apply the intervention. The feasibility study showed a positive direction of effect on perceived quality with the care transition, but a large-scale trial is needed to determine its effectiveness.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Stroke survivors, significant others and healthcare professionals were involved in a co-design process, including the joint development of the intervention's components, contextual factors to consider, participant needs and important outcomes to target.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT0292587.

Racial disparities among mild stroke survivors: predictors of home discharge from a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Half of all strokes are classified as mild, and most mild stroke survivors are discharged home after their initial hospitalization without any post-acute rehabilitation despite experiencing cognitive, psychosocial, motor, and mobility impairments.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics of mild stroke survivors and their association with discharge location.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of mild stroke survivors from 2015-2023 in an academic medical center. Demographic characteristics, clinical measures, and discharge locations were obtained from the electronic health record. The Social Vulnerability Index was used to measure the community vulnerability. Associations between variables and discharge location were examined using bivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 2,953 mild stroke survivors included in this study. The majority of participants were White (65.46%), followed by Black (19.40%). Black stroke survivors and individuals with higher social vulnerability had a higher proportion of discharges to skilled nursing facilities (p = 0.001). Black patients and patients with high vulnerability in housing type and transportation were less likely to be discharged home.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild stroke survivors have a high rate of home discharge, potentially because less severe stroke symptoms have a reduced need for intensive care. Racial disparities in discharge location were evident, with Black stroke survivors experiencing higher rates of institutionalized care and lower likelihood of being discharged home compared to White counterparts, emphasizing the importance of addressing these disparities for equitable healthcare delivery and optimal outcomes.

The safety of same-day discharge following percutaneous coronary intervention in regional Australia

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has proven safe, and global adoption of this strategy has been increasing rapidly. These data are predominantly derived from high-volume, metropolitan centres with a relative paucity of data from regional and remote settings.

AIMS

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a same-day, criteria-led discharge strategy following elective transradial PCI in a regional setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-centre cohort study. Consecutive outpatients aged ≥18 years presenting for elective transradial invasive coronary angiography between March 2019 and February 2024 were included in the analysis. We report the primary composite outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality and unplanned hospital readmission and compare proportions between those who were discharged on the day of their procedure with those admitted overnight in hospital and discharged the next day.

RESULTS

A total of 555 eligible patients were identified, of which 330 (60%) were discharged on the day of their procedure. The composite primary end-point occurred in seven (2%) of the SDD patients and in six (3%) of the overnight admission patients (relative risk = 0.80; 95% confidence interval = 0.27-2.34; P = 0.68). No significant differences were seen in rates of readmission, or in other clinical outcomes assessed, including death, myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular complications or bleeding.

CONCLUSION

In a regional setting, SDD following elective transradial PCI, in select patients, is a safe approach which was not associated with higher rates of unplanned readmission or adverse clinical outcomes.

Feasibility and Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge after Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Introduction: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) provides much quicker recovery for men than open prostatectomy. In most centers, discharge is planned the morning after operation. However, after several years, we observed that no routine intervention was required for a majority of men over the first evening. Here, we detail our institution's outcomes for multiport RARP (MP-RARP) with same-day discharge (SDD). Methods: After excluding patients with single-port RARP (n = 25) and overnight stays (n = 30), data from 224 patients (n = 224/279, 88.2%) who underwent MP-RARP from May 2021 to September 2023 were collected. All patients were placed on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and were given instructions regarding SDD. Patients were considered as SDD if they were discharged on the day of operation. Data regarding messages and phone calls to health care providers, urology clinic, and emergency department visits were recorded for analysis in the week postoperation. Results: The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) operative time was 142.5 ± 25.2 minutes, with a mean (±SD) console time of 95.1 ± 25.6 minutes. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) estimated blood loss was 50 (50-100) mL, and the mean (±SD) length of hospitalization was 163.2 ± 64.6 minutes. No intraoperative complications occurred in this cohort. The median (IQR) patient-reported pain score at 1 hour after operation was 3.5 (0-7), compared with 2 (0-4) at discharge. Of the 145 (64.7%) patients who reported their postoperative pain management, only 50 (34.4%) endorsed using opioids, and of those, 8 (16%) were known chronic opioid users. In the week after operation, 14 (6.3%) patients had unplanned visits to the health care facility. Additionally, 56 (25%) of patients contacted the clinic regarding the postoperative course during the same time frame. Conclusions: SDD after RARP is predictable and safe. SDD helps reduce the costs associated with inpatient stays without compromising surgical outcomes for patients.

Discharge Follow-Up of Patients in Primary Care Does Not Meet Their Care Needs: Results of a Longitudinal Multicentre Study

Adequate coordination between healthcare levels has been proven to improve clinical indicators, care costs, and user satisfaction. This is more relevant to complex or vulnerable patients, who often require increased care. This study aims to evaluate the differences between hospital discharge follow-up indicators, including number of general practitioners' (GPs) and community nurses' (CNs) consultations, presentiality of consultations, type of first post-discharge consultation, and time between hospital discharge and first consultation. Vulnerable and non-vulnerable patients were compared. A longitudinal retrospective study was carried out in the north of Tenerife on the post-discharge care of patients discharged from the Canary Islands University Hospital (Spanish acronym HUC) between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022. The results obtained show deficiencies in the care provided to patients by primary care (PC) after being discharged from the hospital, including delayed first visits, low presentiality of those visits that were less frequent even with increased patient complexity, scarce first home visits to functionally impaired patients and delays in such visits, and a lack of priority visits to patients with increased follow-up needs. Addressing these deficiencies could help those most in need of care to receive PC, thus reducing inequalities and granting equal access to healthcare services in Spain.

Factors associated with postoperative discharge readiness and continuing care needs in patients with lung cancer undergoing fast-track surgery: A prospective cohort study

To investigate and analyze the characteristics and factors associated with readiness for hospital discharge and continuing care needs of postoperative patients with lung cancer undergoing fast-track surgery (FTS). FTS aims to reduce the body's stress response to surgery and improve patient outcomes. The study included adult patients with confirmed lung cancer who underwent lung cancer surgery under FTS management and were discharged from the Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, between June 2020 and September 2020. Patients with severe illnesses, comorbidities, disturbance of consciousness, cognitive disorders, or communication impairments were excluded. One-hundred-and-eighty patients were included, and 167 (92.8%) indicated that they were discharge-ready. Multivariable regression analysis showed that age 60 years or older (β = 16.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.11-28.46, P = .009) and living alone (β = 37.07, 95% CI: 16.30-45.84, P < .001) were associated with the discharge readiness scores. In addition, those who were able to take care of themselves (β = 43.57, 95% CI: 19.60-67.54, P < .001) and needed little assistance at home (β = 28.39, 95% CI: 5.52-51.26, P = .015) had higher discharge readiness scores than those who needed a lot of assisted care. Patients who were cared for at home by children (β = 40.32, 95% CI: 4.91-75.73, P = .026), parents (β = 56.68, 95% CI: 12.33-101.03, P = .013), or spouses (β = 35.92, 95% CI: 2.45-69.38, P = .036), had higher discharge readiness scores than nursemaid. The discharge readiness scores of patients requiring continuing care were 146.5 ± 39.3, while patients who had no need scored 179.8 ± 36.5 (P < .01). Most patients with lung cancer undergoing FTS are discharge-ready. Discharge readiness is influenced by living conditions and self-care ability. This study identified factors influencing discharge readiness, and that could be used to identify patients who could benefit from help to improve discharge readiness.

GPER Stimulation Attenuates Cardiac Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia poses a substantial clinical challenge, characterized by maternal hypertension, cardiac dysfunction, and persistent cardiovascular risks for both the mother and offspring. Despite the known roles of the estrogen receptor (GPER [G protein-coupled estrogen receptor]) in placental development, its impact on cardiovascular aspects within a preeclampsia animal model remains unexplored. We propose that G-1, a GPER agonist, could have the potential to regulate not only hypertension but also cardiac dysfunction in rats with preeclampsia.

METHODS

To explore the influence of G-1 on preeclampsia, we used the reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) model. RUPP rats were administered either G-1 (100 µg/kg per day) or hydralazine (25 mg/kg per day). We conducted echocardiography to probe the intricate cardiac effects of G-1.

RESULTS

The RUPP rat model revealed signs of hypertension and cardiac dysfunction and alterations in gene and protein expression within placental and heart tissues. G-1 treatment reduced blood pressure and reversed cardiac dysfunction in rats with preeclampsia. In contrast, administration of the vasodilator hydralazine reduced blood pressure without an improvement in cardiac function. In addition, while G-1 treatment restored the levels of sFLT-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1) in RUPP rats, hydralazine did not normalize this antiangiogenic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic intervention of G-1 significantly mitigated the cardiovascular dysfunction observed in the RUPP rat model of preeclampsia. This discovery underscores the broader significance of understanding GPER's role in the context of preeclampsia-related cardiovascular complications.

Risk-scoring system predicting need for hospital-specific interventional care after peroral endoscopic myotomy

OBJECTIVES

Early identification of patients needing hospital-specific interventional care (HIC) following endoscopic treatment is valuable for optimizing postoperative hospital stays. We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for predicting HIC in patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

METHODS

This study included patients with esophageal motility disorders who underwent POEM at our hospital between April 2015 and March 2023. HIC was defined as any of the following situations: fasting for gastrointestinal rest to manage adverse events (AEs); intravenous administration of medications such as antibiotics and blood transfusion; endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical interventions; intensive care unit management; or other life-threatening events. A risk-scoring system for predicting HIC after postoperative day (POD) 1 was developed using multivariable logistic regression and was internally validated using bootstrapping and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 589 patients, 50 (8.5%) experienced HIC after POD1. Risk scores were assigned for four factors as follows: age (0 points for <70 years, 1 point for 70-79 years, 2 points for ≥80 years), preoperative prognostic nutritional index (0 points for >45, 1 point for 40-45, 4 points for <40), postoperative surgical site AEs on second-look endoscopy (7 points), and postoperative pneumonia on chest radiography (6 points). The discriminative ability (concordance statistics, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.91) and calibration (slope 1.00; 0.74-1.28) were satisfactory. The decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical usefulness.

CONCLUSION

This risk-scoring system can predict the HIC after POD1 and provide useful information for determining discharge.

Hospital discharge intervention developed in a dialogical way with families to prepare them to care for children with chronic diseases at home: Mixed methods study

A convergent parallel mixed methods design with qualitative data collection embedded in a quasi-experimental study was developed to examine the potential of three modalities of preparation for hospital discharge of the families of children with chronic diseases in terms of uncertainty levels and management of the disease at home. Caregivers of these children were divided into three groups: two experimental groups and one control group. Two scales were applied: one measured family management, and the other evaluated uncertainties in relation to the disease. In addition, an in-depth interview was conducted. Wilcoxon's test and the integrated response index were used in data analysis to compare performance between the groups. Inductive thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative data. The data were integrated, comparing the groups before and after preparation for hospital discharge. Twenty-five family caregivers completed this study. Data integration showed that the intervention group, in which the families developed planning to prepare for discharge in a dialogical way with professionals, presented better perceptions regarding care management when compared to structured guide and usual care groups. Participation of families in planning for hospital discharge showed a reduction in uncertainties regarding the disease and better care management of children at home.

Estimating the Impact of Hospital-Level Variation on the Use of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Versus Skilled Nursing Facilities on Individual Patients With Stroke

BACKGROUND

There is substantial hospital-level variation in the use of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs) versus Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) among patients with stroke, which is poorly understood. Our objective was to quantify the net effect of the admitting hospital on the probability of receiving IRF or SNF care for individual patients with stroke.

METHODS

Using Medicare claims data (2011-2013), a cohort of patients with acute stroke discharged to an IRF or SNF was identified. We generated 2 multivariable logistic regression models. Model 1 predicted IRF admission (versus SNF) using only patient-level factors, whereas model 2 added a hospital random effect term to quantify the hospital effect. The statistical significance and direction of the random effect terms were used to categorize hospitals as being either IRF-favoring, SNF-favoring, or neutral with respect to their discharge patterns. The hospital's impact on individual patient's probability of IRF discharge was estimated by taking the change in individual predicted probabilities (change in individual predicted probability) between the 2 models. Hospital-level effects were categorized as small (<10%), moderate (10%-19%), or large (≥20%) depending on change in individual predicted probability.

RESULTS

The cohort included 135 415 patients (average age, 81.5 [SD=8.0] years, 61% female, 91% ischemic stroke) who were discharged from 1816 acute care hospitals to IRFs (n=66 548) or SNFs (n=68 867). Half of hospitals were classified as being either IRF-favoring (n=461, 25.4%) or SNF-favoring (n=485, 26.7%) with the remainder (n=870, 47.9%) considered neutral. Overall, just over half (n=73 428) of patients were treated at hospitals that had moderate or large independent effects on discharge settings. Hospital effects for neutral hospitals were small (ie, change in individual predicted probability <10%) for most patients (72.5%). However, hospital effects were moderate or large for 78.8% and 84.6% of patients treated at IRF- or SNF-favoring hospitals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For most patients with stroke, the admitting hospital meaningfully changed the type of rehabilitation care that they received.

An eHealth Coaching Solution to Improve Transitional Care of Seniors with Heart Failure: Long-Field Trial

Heart failure is the leading reason for seniors being admitted to hospitals. Over half of the elderly individuals diagnosed with heart failure find themselves readmitted to hospitals within a span of six months. This recurrence is associated with inadequate adherence to medical treatment and recommendations, underscoring the necessity for support systems that aid seniors in better adhering to post-hospitalization instructions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the usability, usefulness and added value of the core functionalities within the H2HCare Ambient Assisted Living developed system that was evaluated with 11 participants over a long field trial of three months. Our assessment encompassed the examination of their Quality of Life as well as the usability and efficacy of the system. Overall, participants reported finding the system user-friendly, beneficial, and conducive to enhanced disease management. Improvements include tailoring the alarm system to patient standards and using a questionnaire to assess situation urgency.

Continuous Monitoring by a Wearable Sensor Did Not Enhance Discharge Decision-Making in an Acute Admission Ward: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Adding continuous monitoring to usual care at an acute admission ward did not have an effect on the proportion of patients safely discharged. Implementation challenges of continuous monitoring may have contributed to the lack of effect observed.

Factors Influencing Discharges to Hospice for Patients With Late-Stage Huntington's Disease

Background: Hospice services for patients with Huntington's disease (HD) are likely beneficial in relieving significant burdens and minimizing costly hospitalizations at the end of life, though there has been little study or clinical guidance on hospice enrollment for patients with HD. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to identify clinical, sociodemographic, and system-level factors associated with discharges to hospice compared to other dispositions for hospitalized patients with late-stage HD. Methods: These analyses used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between the years 2007 and 2011. Weighted logistic regression with a forward selection approach was performed to identify factors associated with discharge to hospice compared to discharge to home, facility, other locations, and death in hospital. Results: These analyses included 6544 hospitalizations of patients with late-stage HD. There was a significant increasing trend in discharges to hospice over the study period (P < 0.001). After adjustment, multiple clinical, sociodemographic, and system-level variables were identified as being associated with discharges to hospice. Patients with aspiration pneumonia and non-aspiration pneumonias had lower odds of being discharged to hospice compared to dying in the hospital. When comparing to discharges to facilities and home, weight loss and palliative care consultation were associated with greater odds of discharge to hospice. Conclusions: Our findings serve as a foundation for future studies on these factors, and thus help clinician decision-making on when to start advance care planning or end-of-life care for patients with HD. These results also support studies developing hospice referral criteria specific to patients with HD.

Promoting medication safety for older adults upon hospital discharge: Guiding principles for a medication discharge plan

Older adults are at risk of adverse drug events during transition of care from hospital to community, thus optimal communication about medications at discharge is essential. Standardization of medication discharge plan (MDP) is lacking. This study aimed to (1) create a standardized MDP for older adults using consensus-based principles, (2) create a short-version MDP and (3) generate a practical guide. Modified Delphi was used to establish consensus on guiding principles for the MDP. Additionally, participants were asked about guiding principles deemed most essential, patient prioritization, the format and mode of transmission of the MDP. Twenty-six guiding principles reached consensus, with 17 prioritized for a short-version MDP. The practical guide includes explanations of the guiding principles, criteria for patient selection and recommendations on the format and mode of transmission. The results of this study will assist implementation of MDPs when older adults are discharged from hospital.

Barriers to Discharge of Hip Fracture Patients From An Academic Hospital: A Retrospective Data Analysis

Introduction

Adherence to best practices for care of hip fracture patients is fundamental to decreasing morbidity and mortality in older adults. This includes timely transfer from the hospital to rehabilitation soon after their surgical care. Hospitals experience challenges in implementing several best practices. We examined the potential barriers associated with timely discharge for patients who underwent a hip fracture surgery in an academic hospital in Ontario, Canada.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional review of a local database. We used descriptive statistics to characterize individuals according to the time of discharge after surgery. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with delayed discharge (>6 days post-surgery).

Results

A total of 492 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between September 2019 and August 2020 were included in the study. The odds of having a delayed discharge occurred when patients had a higher frailty score (odds ratios [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02;1.38), experienced an episode of delirium (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.35;4.79), or were non-weightbearing (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.07;8.43). Patients were less likely to have a delayed discharge when the surgery was on a weekend (OR .50, 95% CI .32;.79) compared to a weekday, patients had a total hip replacement (OR .28, 95% CI .10;.80) or dynamic hip screw fixation (OR .49, 95% CI .25;.98) compared to intramedullary nails, or patients who were discharged to long-term care (OR .05, 95% CI .02;.13), home (OR .26, 95% CI .15;.46), or transferred to another specialty in the hospital (OR .49, 95% CI .29;.84) compared to inpatient rehabilitation.

Conclusions

Clinical and organizational factors can operate as potential barriers to timely discharge after hip fracture surgery. Further research is needed to understand how to overcome these barriers and implement strategies to improve best practice for post-surgery hip fracture care.

Impact of changes in antihypertensive medication on treatment intensity at hospital discharge and 30 days afterwards

Introduction

Little is known about the cumulative effect of changes in antihypertensive medications on treatment intensity. This study analyzed how changes in antihypertensive medications affect the intensity of antihypertensive treatment at hospital discharge and 30 days afterwards.

Methods

A prospective observational study of 299 hospitalized adult medical patients with antihypertensive therapy was conducted. The effect of medication changes on treatment intensity was evaluated by the Total Antihypertensive Therapeutic Intensity Score (TIS).

Results

At discharge, antihypertensive medications were changed in 62% of patients (184/299), resulting in a very small median reduction in TIS of -0.16. Treatment intensity was reduced more with increasing number of antihypertensive medications at admission, whereas it increased with elevated inpatient systolic blood pressure. Thirty days after discharge, antihypertensive medications were changed in 37% of patients (88/239) resulting in a median change in TIS of -0.02. Among them, 90% (79/88) had already undergone a change at discharge. The change in treatment intensity after discharge was inversely correlated with a change at discharge.

Discussion

Changes in antihypertensive medication frequently occurred at discharge but had a minimal impact on the intensity of antihypertensive treatment. However, these adjustments exposed patients to further medication changes after discharge, evidencing the need for treatment reassessment in the first month post-discharge.

Tracheostomy care for adults and the elderly in the home environment: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map out scientific knowledge regarding tracheostomy care for adults and the elderly carried out by individuals, famies or caregivers in home environments.

METHOD

Scoping review, conducted in February 2023, according to the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The guiding question was: what and how should adult/elderly tracheostomy care be carried out by the individual/family/caregiver in the home environment? Studies published in Portuguese, English and Spanish were considered. The databases consulted were: Lilacs; Medline, via PubMed; Cinahl; Cochrane Library; PEDro; Embase; Scopus and Web of Science.

RESULTS

2158 articles were identified, of which 81 were read in full and 14 included in the review. The main types of care identified included psychobiological needs: airway suction, changing the tracheostomy attachment, cleaning the endocannula and sanitizing the peristomal skin. As for psychosocial needs, incentives for communication and autonomy were identified. There were no recommendations for care related to psychospiritual needs.

CONCLUSION

The findings prioritize biological care, few studies have detailed how to carry out such care at home.

Ethical considerations in evaluating discharge readiness from the intensive care unit

Evaluating readiness for discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) is a critical aspect of patient care. Whereas evidence-based criteria for ICU admission have been established, practical criteria for discharge from the ICU are lacking. Often discharge guidelines simply state that a patient no longer meets ICU admission criteria. Such discharge criteria can be interpreted differently by different healthcare providers, leaving a clinical void where misunderstandings of patients' readiness can conflict with perceptions of what readiness means for patients, families, and healthcare providers. In considering ICU discharge readiness, the use and application of ethical principles may be helpful in mitigating such conflicts and achieving desired patient outcomes. Ethical principles propose different ways of understanding what readiness might mean and how clinicians might weigh these principles in their decision-making process. This article examines the concept of discharge readiness through the lens of the most widely cited ethical principles (autonomy [respect for persons], nonmaleficence/beneficence, and justice) and provides a discussion of their application in the critical care environment. Ongoing bioethics discourse and empirical research are needed to identify factors that help determine discharge readiness within critical care environments that will ultimately promote safe and effective ICU discharges for patients and their families.

Optimizing Opioid Prescription Quantity After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To test whether an individualized opioid-prescription protocol (IOPP) with a shared decision-making component can be used without compromising postcesarean pain management.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial, we compared IOPP with shared decision making with a fixed quantity of opioid tablets at hospital discharge. We recruited at 31 centers participating in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Study participants had uncomplicated cesarean births. Follow-up occurred through 12 weeks postdischarge. Individuals with complicated cesarean births or history of opioid use in the pregnancy were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to IOPP with shared decision making or fixed quantity (20 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone). In the IOPP group, we calculated recommended tablet quantity based on opioid use in the 24 hours before discharge. After an educational module and shared decision making, participants selected a quantity of discharge tablets (up to 20). The primary outcome was moderate to severe pain (score 4 or higher [possible range 0-10]) on the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) at 1 week after discharge. A total sample size of 5,500 participants was planned to assess whether IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to the fixed quantity of 20 tablets.

RESULTS

From September 2020 to March 2022, 18,990 individuals were screened and 5,521 were enrolled (n=2,748 IOPP group, n=2,773 fixed-quantity group). For the primary outcome, IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to fixed quantity (59.5% vs 60.1%, risk difference 0.67%; 95% CI, -2.03% to 3.37%, noninferiority margin -5.0) and resulted in significantly fewer tablets received (median 14 [interquartile range 4-20] vs 20, P <.001) through 90 days postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Compared with fixed quantity, IOPP with shared decision making was noninferior for outpatient postcesarean analgesia at 1 week postdischarge and resulted in fewer prescribed opioid tablets at discharge.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04296396.

Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized to Community Hospitals With Malignant Brain Tumors and Factors Associated With Discharge Destination

Background

Our main objective was to compare the characteristics and hospital outcomes of patients with primary and metastatic brain malignancies and to investigate the associated factors related to hospital outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 1628 patients with brain malignancies from 8 community hospitals between 2017 and 2022 who were identified using International Classification of Disease codes. A stepwise logistic regression was used to identify demographics and clinical characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality and home discharge.

Results

The median age was 65 years old, with 72.5% of patients having metastatic brain malignancies. After 7.2 days of hospital stay, 49.2% were discharged home, and 102 patients expired during hospitalization. Increased age, medical coverage by Medicare, hemiplegia or paraplegia, lower initial hemoglobin level, increased length of stay, and the use of electrolyte replacement, antibiotics, laxatives, heparin, and anticonvulsants were associated with a decreased likelihood of discharge to home. No medical insurance, Medicaid insurance coverage, comorbidities of cerebrovascular disorder, the need to stay in the intensive care unit, patient safety indicator events, and the use of antibiotics, oral analgesics, and ipratropium-albuterol were associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

We identified several predictor variables that delineate differences between both mortality risk and home discharge in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. Understanding these predictor variables can be helpful in improving the acute and post-acute care of this population.

Impact of educational intervention on understanding health recommendations after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the impact of educational intervention on understanding health recommendations after liver transplantation.

METHODS

randomized and prospective clinical trial, with 68 liver transplant recipients in two institutions. The level of understanding was assessed using a statement agreement scale and the understanding score was classified. Chi-square test was used to compare groups.

RESULTS

the level of understanding was reasonable in 77.9% of patients, 73.5% in the Control Group and 82.3% in the Intervention Group (p=0.399). For topics covered after educational action, there were more than 80% correct answers regarding nutrition, frequent hydration, usage and function of immunosuppressants. However, there were less than 10% correct answers regarding hand hygiene, contact with animals and crowds of people. The use of the patient's audio, visual and tactile resources led to improved understanding of skin care (p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

the level of understanding acquired regarding health recommendations was only reasonable.