Case presentation: a severe case of cobalamin c deficiency presenting with nephrotic syndrome, malignant hypertension and hemolytic anemia

BACKGROUND

The etiology of nephrotic syndrome can vary, with underlying metabolic diseases being a potential factor. Cobalamin C (cblC) defect is an autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism caused by mutations in the MMACHC gene, resulting in impaired vitamin B12 processing. While cblC defect typically manifests with hematological and neurological symptoms, renal involvement is increasingly recognized but remains rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a 7-month-old male patient presenting with fatigue and edema. His first laboratory findings showed anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia and proteinuria and further examinations reveals hemolysis in peripheric blood smear. During his follow up respiratory distress due to pleural effusion in the right hemithorax was noticed. And fluid leakage to the third spaces supported nephrotic syndrome diagnosis. The patient's condition deteriorated, leading to intensive care admission due to, hypertensive crisis, and respiratory distress. High total plasma homocysteine and low methionine levels raised suspicion of cobalamin metabolism disorders. Genetic testing confirmed biallelic MMACHC gene mutations, establishing the diagnosis of cblC defect. Treatment with hydroxycobalamin, folic acid, and betaine led to remarkable clinical improvement.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This case underscores the significance of recognizing metabolic disorders like cblC defect in atypical presentations of nephrotic syndrome. Early diagnosis and comprehensive management are vital to prevent irreversible renal damage. While cblC defects are more commonly associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, this case highlights the importance of considering cobalamin defects in the differential diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome, especially when associated with accompanying findings such as hemolysis. Our case, which has one of the highest homocysteine levels reported in the literature, emphasizes this situation again.

Pulmonary renal syndrome secondary to malignant hypertension

A man in his early 30s presented with sudden-onset respiratory distress, haemoptysis and reduced urine output. He was in volume overload with a blood pressure recording of 240/180 mm Hg. Pulmonary renal syndrome was suspected and he was initiated on plasmapheresis, followed by steroid pulse therapy. Chest radiography and the presence of fragmented red cells on the peripheral smear were unexplained. These were later explained by hypertensive nephropathy and thrombotic microangiopathy changes on renal biopsy. His respiratory and haematological parameters improved with blood pressure control. Malignant hypertension closely resembles pulmonary renal syndrome, which must be remembered in order to avoid plasmapheresis and high-dose immunosuppressive therapy.

A multi-centre case series of patients with coexistent intracranial hypertension and malignant arterial hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and management of a large cohort of patients with concomitant malignant arterial hypertension and intracranial hypertension.

METHODS

Design: Retrospective case series.

SUBJECTS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with bilateral optic disc oedema (ODE), malignant arterial hypertension and intracranial hypertension at five academic institutions. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnostic studies, and management were collected.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (58% female, 63% Black) were included. Median age was 35 years; body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m2. Fourteen (74%) patients had pre-existing hypertension. The most common presenting symptom was blurred vision (89%). Median blood pressure (BP) was 220 mmHg systolic (IQR 199-231.5 mmHg) and 130 mmHg diastolic (IQR 116-136 mmHg) mmHg), and median lumbar puncture opening pressure was 36.5 cmH2O. All patients received treatment for arterial hypertension. Seventeen (89%) patients received medical treatment for raised intracranial pressure, while six (30%) patients underwent a surgical intervention. There was significant improvement in ODE, peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, and visual field in the worst eye (p < 0.05). Considering the worst eye, 9 (47%) presented with acuity ≥ 20/25, while 5 (26%) presented with ≤ 20/200. Overall, 7 patients maintained ≥ 20/25 acuity or better, 6 demonstrated improvement, and 5 demonstrated worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

Papilloedema and malignant arterial hypertension can occur simultaneously with potentially greater risk for severe visual loss. Clinicians should consider a workup for papilloedema among patients with significantly elevated blood pressure and bilateral optic disc oedema.

Atypical presentation of malignant hypertension

A woman in her 30s presented with complaints of sudden onset of defective vision in the right eye for 2 days, with history of headache for a month. On examination, best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. Anterior segment examination was normal. Fundus examination of both the eyes showed generalised arteriolar attenuation with diffuse, hyperaemic disc oedema and serous retinal detachment at macula in the right eye. Her blood pressure (BP) was 230/140 mm Hg. Other systemic evaluation was unremarkable. In the review visit, patient's BP reduced to 140/100 mm Hg, and visual acuity in the right eye improved to 20/20. Fundus in the right eye showed resolving disc oedema with macular star formation, and the left eye had developed soft exudates. This seemed to confirm the diagnosis of the disc oedema being caused by hypertension and a highly asymmetrical presentation of hypertensive retinopathy.

Management of hypertensive crisis: British and Irish Hypertension Society Position document

Patients with hypertensive emergencies, malignant hypertension and acute severe hypertension are managed heterogeneously in clinical practice. Initiating anti-hypertensive therapy and setting BP goal in acute settings requires important considerations which differ slightly across various diagnoses and clinical contexts. This position paper by British and Irish Hypertension Society, aims to provide clinicians a framework for diagnosing, evaluating, and managing patients with hypertensive crisis, based on the critical appraisal of available evidence and expert opinion.

Malignant Hypertension and Bilateral Primary Aldosteronism

Malignant hypertension triggers incremental renin activity, whereas primary aldosteronism suppresses such activity. We encountered a patient with malignant hypertension refractory to multiple anti-hypertensive agents. Repeated neurohormonal assessments, instead of a single one, eventually uncovered trends in an incremental aldosterone concentration, ranging from 221 up to 468 pg/mL, with a decline in the renin activity from 2.3 to <0.2 ng/mL/h. Adrenal venous sampling confirmed bilateral aldosterone secretion. Following the diagnosis of bilateral primary aldosteronism, we initiated a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, which improved his blood pressure. Repeated neurohormonal assessments are encouraged to correctly diagnose underlying primary aldosteronism with malignant hypertension.

Diagnostic and Risk Factors for Complement Defects in Hypertensive Emergency and Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Hypertensive emergency can cause thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in the kidneys with high rates of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and vice versa. The conundrum of hypertension as the cause of TMA or consequence of TMA on the background of defects in complement regulation remains difficult. Patients with hypertensive emergency and TMA on kidney biopsy were tested for ex vivo C5b9 formation on the endothelium and rare variants in complement genes to identify complement-mediated TMA. We identified factors associated with defects in complement regulation and poor renal outcomes. Massive ex vivo C5b9 formation was found on resting endothelial cells in 18 (69%) out of 26 cases at the presentation, including the 9 patients who carried at least one rare genetic variant. Thirteen (72%, N=18) and 3 (38%, N=8) patients with massive and normal ex vivo complement activation, respectively, progressed to ESRD (P=0.03). In contrast to BP control, inhibition of C5 activation prevented ESRD to occur in 5 (83%, N=6) patients with massive ex vivo complement activation. TMA-related graft failure occurred in 7 (47%, N=15) donor kidneys and was linked to genetic variants. The assessment of both ex vivo C5b9 formation and screening for rare variants in complement genes may categorize patients with hypertensive emergency and TMA into different groups with potential therapeutic and prognostic implications. We propose an algorithm to recognize patients at the highest risk for defects in complement regulation.

Malignant Hypertension Complicated By Renal Thrombotic Micro Angiopathy: Role Of Adam 13 Mutational Analyses

We report a case of a 38-year-old U.A.E national who presented with malignant hypertension and features of thrombotic microangiopathy. He presented with oliguria, renal failure, thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia. He required several sessions of renal replacement therapy. ADAM 13 mutational analysis was sent to differentiate Thrombotic micro angiopathy due to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) or malignant hypertension. Renal biopsy revealed histopathological features of malignant arteriolar nephrosclerosis (MANS). Haemolytic parameters improved after control of blood pressure and he was subsequently discharged with early nephrology follow up.

Malignant Hypertension Revisited-Does This Still Exist?

Malignant or accelerated hypertension is the most severe form of hypertension, defined clinically by very high blood pressure (diastolic above 130 mm Hg) accompanied by bilateral retinal hemorrhages and/or exudates, with or without papilledema. The aim of this review is to discuss if malignant hypertension still poses a clinically relevant entity and to highlight the diagnostic challenges of this form of hypertension. The substantial improvement in prognosis in patients with malignant hypertension over the last decades is well documented, but there is no strong evidence to suggest a significant change in its incidence. In fact, with the growing population and improving life expectancy, malignant hypertension is likely to become even more prevalent worldwide, especially in the developing countries with less advanced health care services. Despite simple diagnostic criteria of malignant hypertension, the diagnoses may be difficult in many patients. Malignant hypertension patients often have the diagnosis established only when the target organ damage occur. Furthermore, retrospective diagnosis is problematic, as malignant hypertensive retinopathy gradually resolves over a relatively short period of time, while persistent target organ damage will, however, lead to the development of complications and much poorer prognosis than in nonmalignant hypertension patients. Certainly, malignant hypertension still poses a clinically relevant and challenging form of hypertension and its possibility should be always considered during the assessment of patients with poorly controlled hypertension.

[Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies]

Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies are common situations in clinical practice. Hypertensive urgencies are characterized by acute elevation of blood pressure without target organ damage. Hypertensive emergencies are life-threatening situations characterized by acute elevation of blood pressure and target organ damage. The aims of blood pressure control, antihypertensive drugs to use and route of administration will depend on the presence or absence of target organ damage and individual patient characteristics. The correct diagnosis and treatment of these situations are essential for patient prognosis. © 2017 SEHLELHA. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Malignant Hypertension with Thrombotic Microangiopathy

A 49-year-old man with malignant hypertension, acute kidney injury and mental deterioration was referred to our hospital. We initially observed microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and kidney damage, indicating he had thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). We considered TMA was caused by malignant hypertension and therefore did not start plasma therapy. The French TMA reference center reported that platelet counts and serum creatine levels have high values for predicting severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. The patient fully recovered from his illness after treatment with antihypertensive drugs and intermittent hemodialysis. This case might thus be useful to understand the proper differential diagnosis and treatment of TMA.

[HYPERTENSIVE CRISIS: MODERN VIEW OF THE PROBLEM AND OPTIMIZATION OF DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC MODALITIES]

The data collected by Burdenko Military Hospital indicate that in the 1980s hypertensive crisis (HC) occurred in roughly 30% of the patients with AH. This value fell down to 16% by 2012, with a rise in the number of uncomplicated crises from 46 to 62%. Analysis of the causes behind these changes showed that half of the patients simply experienced an elevated arterial pressure with minimal clinical symptoms. The decrease in the number of complicated cases from 54 to 39% is doubtful bearing in mind that ICD-10 gives the status of nosological entities to complications of hypertensive crisis (stroke, myocardial infarction, etc.) but not to the HC syndrome proper requiring urgent hospitalization; due to this hypertensive crisis itself tends to be disregarded and not included in statistics. HC with acute clinically significant lesions of target organs requires intensive care or resuscitation using infusion of vasodilators and loop diuretics to stabilize arterial pressure. In case of uncomplicted HC and aggravation of hypertensive disease, the medications of choice are oral short-acting ACE inhibitors and imidazoline receptor agonists.

Scleroderma renal crisis as an initial presentation of systemic sclerosis: a case report and review of the literature

Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) is a life-threatening complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc) that is characterised by new-onset malignant hypertension and progressive acute renal failure, often with associated microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia. SRC was at one time almost uniformly fatal, with death often occurring within a few weeks. With the development of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), survival has improved dramatically, but death rates still remain unacceptably high. About 20% of SRC cases occur prior to making a diagnosis of SSc and, in some cases, there is no evidence of skin sclerosis at the time that SRC develops. In this report, we present a case in which a patient developed SRC prior to being diagnosed with scleroderma. Additionally, we review the pathogenesis, presenting signs and symptoms, management and prognosis of SRC.

Gemcitabine-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome mimicking scleroderma renal crisis presenting with Raynaud's phenomenon, positive antinuclear antibodies and hypertensive emergency

A 58-year-old woman who received gemcitabine for advanced gallbladder cancer developed an impaired renal function, thrombocytopenia, Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ischemic changes, a high antinuclear antibody titer and hypertensive emergency that mimicked a scleroderma renal crisis. A kidney biopsy specimen demonstrated onion-skin lesions in the arterioles and small arteries along with ischemic changes in the glomeruli, compatible with a diagnosis of hypertensive emergency (malignant hypertension). The intravenous administration of a calcium channel blocker, the oral administration of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker and the transfusion of fresh frozen plasma were effective for treating the thrombocytopenia and progressive kidney dysfunction. Gemcitabine induces hemolytic uremic syndrome with accelerated hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon, mimicking scleroderma renal crisis.

[Management of hypertension recorded as at least 180/110 mmHg]

Stage 3 hypertension (severe) is far from rare. It may be part of a previous hypertension condition which is difficult to control, or occur more acutely, in which case it will be harder for the patient to bear. When it is symptomatic and a fortiorione or more organs targeted by hypertension are affected, management must be fast and appropriate. It may take the form of a hypertensive urgency, in which case the investigations and treatment usually take place in outpatients, with oral treatment. it may also be a hypertensive emergency for which treatment involves hospitalization in an intensive care unit with intravenous anti-hypertensive treatment. A reduction in blood pressure must be obtained rapidly but not suddenly; it must be more or less significant depending on the clinical situation, and also progressive.