Abstract 2610: TYMS and XRCC1 gene polymorphisms as possible predictors for the addition of oxaliplatin to 5FU in the adjuvant treatment of stage II and III colorectal cancer

Background: The MOSAIC trial demonstrated that adding oxaliplatin to LV5FU2 significantly improved 5-year disease free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS) in the adjuvant treatment of stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, oxaliplatin-related toxicities represent a problem when managing these patients. Genetic variants in TYMS and XRCC1 have shown to influence patients' outcomes in the metastatic setting. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of these polymorphisms on DFS and OS of stage II/III CRC patients treated with LV5FU2 +/- oxaliplatin in an adjuvant setting. Methods: We genotyped 216 patients (53.7% LV5FU2 and 46.3% FOLFOX4) from the MOSAIC trial. TYMS polymorphisms (5′TRP and 5′UTR SNP) and XRCC1-Arg399Gln were analyzed through PCR, RFLP and allelic discrimination respectively. According to TYMS 5′UTR SNP, genotypes were grouped as low expression (2R/2R, 2R/3RC, 3RC/3RC) or high expression (2R/3RG, 3RC/3RG, 3RG/3RG). Association of genetic variants with DFS and OS was investigated through Kaplan Meyer curves, log rank test and Cox regression models. Results: In our cohort 57.5% of patients were males; median age was 61 years (33-79); stage II/III tumors were equally distributed (50.2% and 49.8%). After 6 years of follow-up, 20.4% (38.6% FOLFOX4, 61.4% LV5FU2) of patients had relapsed and 15.4% (42.4% FOLFOX4, 57.6% LV5FU2) were dead. There were no statistical significant differences in DFS or OS according to individual genetic variants either in the whole group or by treatment. Therefore, they were analyzed jointly. TYMS high expression genotypes were considered as non-favorable for 5FU and XRCC1-399 Gln/Gln or Arg/Gln genotypes were considered as non-favorable for oxaliplatin. Patients in the FOLFOX4 group with non-favorable genotypes were more likely to relapse (28% vs. 11% for some favorable genotype; HR=2.7, 95% CI 1.00-7.34; Log rank p=0.04) or dying (17% vs. 5% for some favorable genotype; HR=2.7, 95% CI 0.92-8.17; Log rank p=0.06). Interestingly, these phenomena didn't occur in the LV5FU2 group of patients. Taken together, patients with some favorable genotype had better outcomes when receiving FOLFOX4 (87% vs. 78% for DFS, HR=0.63, 95% CI 0.28-1.43; p=0.07 and 95% vs. 89% for OS, HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.27-1.15; p=ns) after 6 years of follow-up. Inversely, FOLFOX4 was detrimental for those patients with non-favorable genotypes as compared with patients receiving LV5FU2 (68% vs. 78% for DFS, HR=2.5, 95% CI 0.60-11.1; p=ns and 83% vs. 89% for OS, HR=1.27, 95% CI 0.41-4; p=ns). Conclusion: TYMS 5′UTR SNP and XRCC1 Arg399Gln genotyping could help in the decision of adding or not oxaliplatin to LV5FU2 as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage II/III CRC and thus avoid undesirable oxaliplatin-related toxicities to these patients.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2610.

Quality of life of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab first line for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: A phase III trial demonstrated that cetuximab is the first agent in 30 years to improve survival when added to platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-fluorouracil) first line for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). This analysis of the trial assessed the impact of treatment on quality of life (QoL).

Patients and methods: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-Head and Neck 35 (QLQ-H&N35) module were used to assess QoL.

Results: Of 442 patients randomly assigned, 291 (QLQ-C30) and 289 (QLQ-H&N35) patients completed at least one evaluable questionnaire. For QLQ-C30, cycle 3 and month 6 mean scores for platinum–fluorouracil plus cetuximab were not significantly worse than those for platinum–fluorouracil. Pattern-mixture analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in the global health status/QoL score in the cetuximab arm (P = 0.0415) but no treatment differences in the social functioning scale. For QLQ-H&N35, the mean score for the cetuximab arm was not significantly worse than that for the chemotherapy arm for all symptom scales at all post-baseline visits. At cycle 3, some symptom scores significantly favored the cetuximab arm (pain, swallowing, speech problems, and social eating).

Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to platinum–fluorouracil does not adversely affect the QoL of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN.

Pharmacogenomic and pharmacoproteomic studies of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: biomarker analysis of a phase I dose-escalation study

PURPOSE

This study assessed biomarkers for cetuximab efficacy in tissue samples collected during a phase I dose-escalation study exploring every second week administration of cetuximab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients received cetuximab monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by cetuximab plus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan until disease progression. Patients in the control arm received cetuximab as a 400 mg/m(2) initial dose then 250 mg/m(2) per week; patients in the dose-escalation arms received 400 to 700 mg/m(2) every second week. Tumor and skin biopsies were taken for immunohistochemical and microarray expression analyses (tumor only) at baseline and week 4. Plasma was collected for proteomic analysis at baseline and week 4. KRAS tumor mutation status was assessed.

RESULTS

In subsets of paired skin samples from 35 patients, cetuximab treatment was associated with substantial downregulation of phospho(p)-EGFR, p-MAPK and proliferation and substantial upregulation of p27(Kip1) and p-STAT3 levels. No marked difference in these effects was noted for different schedules of administration and dose levels. In the cetuximab monotherapy phase, responses were seen only in patients whose tumors were wild-type for KRAS (eight of 29 v zero of 19 for KRAS mutant tumors; P = .015). Progression-free survival was longer for patients with KRAS wild-type compared with KRAS mutant tumors (log-rank P = .048). Genomics/proteomics analyses (42 and 45 patients, respectively) identified candidate biomarkers associated with response.

CONCLUSION

Biomarker analysis supported the functional equivalence of weekly and every second week administration of cetuximab and provided further confirmation that patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC were those most likely to benefit from cetuximab treatment.

First-line single-agent cetuximab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A phase II clinical and molecular study of the Spanish group for digestive tumor therapy (TTD)

PURPOSE

to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line single-agent cetuximab in fit elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, as well as potential molecular predictive factors for efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

patients aged 70 or older with metastatic CRC without criteria for frailty and no prior treatment for advanced disease were treated with single-agent cetuximab 400mg/m(2) followed by weekly 250mg/m(2) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

forty-one patients were included. Two patients achieved a complete response and 4 patients had a partial response for an overall response rate of 14.6%. Fifteen patients (36.6%) remained stable. Median time to progression was 2.9 months and median overall survival 11.1 months despite two-third of patients received chemotherapy at progression. Forty-five percent of EGFR gene copy number positive patients by FISH were progression-free at 12 weeks, in contrast with 12% of FISH negative patients (p=0.04). Grade 3 skin toxicity was reported in 5 patients (12.2%). Hypersensitivity infusion reactions were not reported and there were no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSION

cetuximab is a safe monoclonal antibody with moderate activity in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, but the present study does not support the use of cetuximab as single-agent in first-line fit elderly patients with metastatic CRC.

Consensus on the treatment of pancreatic cancer in Spain

Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents one of the greatest oncological challenges of our century, due to its high mortality and incidence. A group of Spanish experts in PC treatment reviewed data available on different therapeutic combinations and established consensus on what would be the best strategy in PC management, depending on the stage of the disease. Surgery with complete resection may produce 5-year survival rates of 18-24%, but definitive control is still precarious. In the absence of consensus, the best evidence suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine for 6 months using the CONKO-001 regime is the treatment of choice after resection of PC for patients with acceptable functional status. This group recommends chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) in patients with factors for poor loco-regional prognosis. However, chemotherapy is an option for the treatment of locally advanced PC in patients with good general status and in the absence of metastatic disease the recommended treatment is CT-RT followed by gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. A period of chemotherapy followed by consolidation CT-RT may be appropriate, as it allows selection of patients with locally advanced disease who may benefit most from combined treatment. Erlotinib combined with gemcitabine shows significant survival improvement in PC and must be considered an option in the first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic PC. The gemcitabine-erlotinib combination is proposed as the standard treatment for metastatic PC in patients with PS=/>2. In patients with PS<2, gemcitabine-erlotinib is recommended as the first-line treatment option, supported by a maximum degree of evidence, without ruling out other options, such as gemcitabine-oxaliplatin, gemcitabine-capecitabine or gemcitabine alone.

Colorectal cancer metastasis resectability after treatment with the combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. Final results of a phase II study

PURPOSE

To investigate the response rate of the triple combination of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and to assess its impact on secondary resectability of previously non-resectable liver metastasis (LM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients > or = 18 with MCRC, ECOG grade 0-2, and no prior treatment received L-OHP (85 mg/m(2)), CPT-11 (150 mg/m(2)) and 5-FU (2 250 mg/m(2) in 48 h CI) on D1 every 15 days.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with initially non-resectable metastatic disease were included. Median age 62 years (38-76); 28 males; 26 patients with 0 performance status (ECOG) 40 patients had prior surgery and four adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for response. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (40%), febrile neutropenia (4%), diarrhea (21%), nausea/vomiting (11%/15%), fatigue (11%), anemia and alopecia (9% each); grade 3-4 neurotoxicity was observed in 28% patients. Secondary surgery was possible in 15 of 47 (31.9%) patients and 12/30 (40%) patients with only LM: in this cohort, median OS has not been reached at 22 months median follow-up, with 2/12 patients having died. Overall response rate was 69% (95% CI, 53-82%); 13 (31%) had stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival (OS) were 10.9 (95% CI, 9.9-13.2) and 19.9 (95% CI, 11.7-TBD) months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This combination has shown promising activity with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in MCRC, and has allowed the resectability of LM in a considerable number of patients, offering them the possibility of long-term survival.

A randomized phase III study comparing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with FOLFIRI in patients following complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies indicate that adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA) in colorectal cancer patients with completely resectable liver-limited metastases (LMCRC) offers clinical benefit over surgery alone. This phase III trial compared FOLFIRI with simplified 5-FU/FA in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

LMCRC patients were randomized to receive every 14 days, FA, 400 mg/m2 infused over 2 h, followed by 5-FU as a 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, followed by continuous 5-FU infusion, 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h (LV5FUs) with or without irinotecan: 180 mg/m2 infusion (FOLFIRI). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Treated patients (n = 306) were balanced for critical prognostic factors in each arm. Median DFS in patients receiving LV5FUs was 21.6 versus 24.7 months for FOLFIRI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, log-rank P = 0.44]. No significant differences were found in OS. A trend was observed for improved DFS in patients receiving FOLFIRI within 42 days of surgery (HR 0.75, P = 0.17). Grade 3/4 toxic effects were more common in patients treated with FOLFIRI versus LV5FUs (47% versus 30%) with neutropenia being most common (23% versus 7%).

CONCLUSION

FOLFIRI in the adjuvant treatment of LMCRC showed no significant improvement in DFS compared with LV5FUs.

Phase II trial of preoperative irinotecan-cisplatin followed by concurrent irinotecan-cisplatin and radiotherapy for resectable locally advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine in a Phase II trial whether preoperative irinotecan-cisplatin (IC) followed by concurrent IC therapy and radiotherapy (IC/RT) improved outcome in patients with resectable, locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) or esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable Stage II-IV, M0 GC or EGJC made up the study population. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Two courses of IC (irinotecan, 65 mg/m(2); cisplatin, 30 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days) were given. Patients without progression then received IC/RT, consisting of daily radiotherapy (45Gy) with concurrent IC (irinotecan, 65 mg/m(2); cisplatin, 30 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Surgical resection was performed, if feasible, 5-8 weeks after the end of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included in the study: 10 with EGJC and 13 with GC. Two patients (9%) achieved pCR. The incidences of Grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: IC: neutropenia 35% (febrile 13%), anemia 22%, diarrhea 22%, emesis 8%; IC/RT: neutropenia 52% (febrile 5%), asthenia 19%, anemia 9%, emesis 9%, diarrhea 5%, cardiotoxicity 5%. No patients died during IC or IC/RT. R0 resection was achieved in 15 patients (65%). Median survival was 14.5 months, and the actuarial 2-year survival rate was 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative IC followed by IC/RT resulted in moderate response and resection rates with mild toxicity in patients with GC and EGJC.

FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and high alkaline phosphatase level: an exploratory cohort of the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study

BACKGROUND

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is a strong prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Patients with ALP more than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN) were excluded from our previous studies evaluating chemotherapy. An exploratory cohort of patients with ALP >3 ULN was included in the OPTIMOX1 study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients with MCRC were randomized to FOLFOX4 until progression (arm A) or FOLFOX7 for six cycles, maintenance without oxaliplatin for 12 cycles and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 (arm B). Patients were stratified according to ALP level <or=3 ULN versus 3-5 ULN.

RESULTS

Among the 620 patients in OPTIMOX1 study, 63 had ALP 3-5 ULN; 33 in arm A and 30 in arm B. The response rate in these patients was 56% versus 59% in patients with ALP <or=3 ULN. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 6.4 and 11.5 months in patients with ALP 3-5 ULN and 9.0 and 21.1 months in patients with ALP <or=3 ULN. Thirty-three percent of the patients in the cohort experienced grade 3/4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Both FOLFOX regimens achieved high tumor response rates and offer good palliation in MCRC patients with a poor prognosis.

Safety summary of panitumumab (pmab) in combination with chemotherapy (ctx) from four clinical trials in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

e15005

Background: Pmab is a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody approved in the US and EU (wild-type KRAS) as monotherapy for pts with mCRC. Safety data from 4 studies (Siena et al ASCO 2008; Peeters et al ASCO 2008; Cohn et al ASCO 2008; Mitchell et al WORLD GI 2008) of pmab in combination with ctx are summarized. Methods: Two studies are single-arm, phase II trials and two are randomized, phase III trials with pooled, blinded safety data that include ctx-controls. All studies were multicenter. Common pt eligibility criteria included: diagnosis of mCRC with measurable disease per modified RECIST criteria, age ≥ 18 years, and adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic, and metabolic function. All studies required pts to receive FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or irinotecan ctx in combination with pmab. Pts received pmab 6.0 mg/kg Q2W with FOLFOX Q2W or FOLFIRI Q2W, or pmab 9.0 mg/kg Q3W with irinotecan Q3W. Results from planned interim analyses are available for 3 studies, and results from the final analysis are available for one study. Results: Among the 4-study safety data, 1213 pts received pmab + ctx; 703 pts received pmab + FOLFIRI, 455 pts received pmab + FOLFOX, and 55 pts received pmab + irinotecan. Approximately 1,200 pts were enrolled in each phase III study, and data are available from 1,003 pts who received pmab + ctx and 997 pts who received ctx alone. All pts in the phase III studies, regardless of treatment group, were included in the pooled, blinded interim analysis sets monitored by the data monitoring committee for each study. Safety results for the two phase II studies of pmab + ctx and two phase III studies of pmab ± ctx are summarized (Table). Conclusions: Phase II data are consistent with expectations, and phase III trials are ongoing. A consistent safety profile was observed across studies.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial

PURPOSE Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved in patients who had undergone resection with curative intent for stage II or III colon cancer who received bolus plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) with the addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4). Final results of the study, including 6-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year updated DFS, are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2,246 patients were randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX4 for 6 months. The primary end point was DFS. Secondary end points were OS and safety. Results Five-year DFS rates were 73.3% and 67.4% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93; P = .003). Six-year OS rates were 78.5% and 76.0% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P = .046); corresponding 6-year OS rates for patients with stage III disease were 72.9% and 68.7%, respectively (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; P = .023). No difference in OS was seen in the stage II population. The incidence of second noncolorectal cancers was 5.5% and 6.1% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively. Among patients receiving oxaliplatin, the frequency of grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was 1.3% 12 months after treatment and 0.7% at 48 months. CONCLUSION Adding oxaliplatin to LV5FU2 significantly improved 5-year DFS and 6-year OS in the adjuvant treatment of stage II or III colon cancer and should be considered after surgery for patients with stage III disease.

Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab significantly improves survival when added to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Bevacizumab Expanded Access Trial (BEAT) evaluated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab plus first-line chemotherapy in a general cohort of patients with mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable mCRC received chemotherapy (physician's choice) plus bevacizumab [5 mg/kg every 2 weeks (5-fluorouracil regimens) or 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks (capecitabine regimens)]. The primary end point was safety, including prospective data collection in patients receiving unanticipated surgery during the study. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The final analysis comprised 1914 assessable patients (male 58%; median age 59 years). Chemotherapy included 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) + oxaliplatin (29%), irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV (26%), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (18%) and monotherapy (16%). Serious/grade 3-5 adverse events of interest for bevacizumab included bleeding (3%), gastrointestinal perforation (2%), arterial thromboembolism (1%), hypertension (5.3%), proteinuria (1%) and wound-healing complications (1%). Sixty-day mortality was 3%. Median PFS was 10.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.4-11.3 months] and median OS reached 22.7 months (95% CI 21.7-23.8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The BEAT study shows that the efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in routine clinical practice is consistent with results observed in prospective randomised clinical trials and another large observational study in the United States (BRiTE study).

Treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: from gemcitabine single agent to combinations and targeted therapy

The prognosis of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still poor nowadays. Gemcitabine in monotherapy (30-min infusion) has been the standard of treatment during the last decade, and many clinical trials have failed to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS) with the addition of different drugs to gemcitabine, including cetuximab and bevacizumab. Nevertheless, some modest but interesting advances have been provided by combinations such as gemcitabine-erlotinib, gemcitabine-capecitabine and gemcitabine plus a platinum salt. In spite of this, survival results remain disappointing. Further research focused on new combinations, incorporating the new targeted therapies and identifying potential predictive factors of response are required to be able to offer effective tailored therapies to these patients.

[Coeliac disease and membranous nephropathy]

Celiac disease results from the interaction between gluten and immune, genetic, and environmental factors. Although the main clinical manifestations are derived from gastrointestinal system, it has been described some renal diseases, especially chronic glomerulonephritis. We describe a young female patient with celiac disease that it appears after delivery. Moreover, she develops simultaneously nephrotic proteinuria and microhematuria as a result of membranous nephropathy. The treatment with gluten-free diet and other conservative measures (ACEI and statin) is followed by clinical improvement and simultaneous decrease of tissue antitransglutaminase IgA-antibodies and complete remission of proteinuria. We review the relationship between celiac disease and membranous nephropathy and the role of diet in the management of both diseases.

Elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer derive similar benefit without excessive toxicity after first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin-based combinations: comparative outcomes from the 03-TTD-01 phase III study

PURPOSE

Healthy elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer may benefit from chemotherapy as much as the younger population. This analysis compares the outcomes of first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines in elderly versus young patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

348 patients were randomized to capecitabine 1000 mg/(m2 12 h), days 1-14 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks or weekly infusional 5-FU 2250 mg/m2 over 48 h plus bimonthly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2. We evaluated response rate, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity according to age.

RESULTS

ORR for elderly and young patients were 34.9% and 44.7%, respectively (p=0.081). Median TTP did not differ between the two groups: 8.3 months for patients > or =70 years and 9.6 months for those <70 years (p=0.114). Median OS was 16.8 months and 20.5 months for the > or =70 and <70 years groups, respectively (p=0.74). With XELOX, mild paresthesia and an increase in transaminase levels were more frequent for young patients, whereas grade 3/4 diarrhea was higher in those > or =70 years (25% vs. 8%, p=0.005). For FUOX, only paresthesia was significantly lower in patients > or =70 years (53% vs. 71%, p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with MCRC benefit from first-line oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combinations as much as younger patients, without increased toxicity.

Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab is effective in platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. We investigated the efficacy of cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 220 of 442 eligible patients with untreated recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck to receive cisplatin (at a dose of 100 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 1) or carboplatin (at an area under the curve of 5 mg per milliliter per minute, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on day 1) plus fluorouracil (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter per day for 4 days) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles and 222 patients to receive the same chemotherapy plus cetuximab (at a dose of 400 mg per square meter initially, as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, then 250 mg per square meter, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion per week) for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients with stable disease who received chemotherapy plus cetuximab continued to receive cetuximab until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects, whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

Adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy with fluorouracil (platinum-fluorouracil) significantly prolonged the median overall survival from 7.4 months in the chemotherapy-alone group to 10.1 months in the group that received chemotherapy plus cetuximab (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.99; P=0.04). The addition of cetuximab prolonged the median progression-free survival time from 3.3 to 5.6 months (hazard ratio for progression, 0.54; P<0.001) and increased the response rate from 20% to 36% (P<0.001). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the chemotherapy-alone and cetuximab groups were anemia (19% and 13%, respectively), neutropenia (23% and 22%), and thrombocytopenia (11% in both groups). Sepsis occurred in 9 patients in the cetuximab group and in 1 patient in the chemotherapy-alone group (P=0.02). Of 219 patients receiving cetuximab, 9% had grade 3 skin reactions and 3% had grade 3 or 4 infusion-related reactions. There were no cetuximab-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with platinum-based chemotherapy plus fluorouracil alone, cetuximab plus platinum-fluorouracil chemotherapy improved overall survival when given as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00122460.)

Retrospective analysis of surgical resection after induction chemotherapy for patients with T4b squamous cell head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment of patients with T4b squamous cell head and neck cancer (T4b-SCHNC) is concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT). Recent Phase III trials with Taxane containing induction chemotherapy (IC) suggest that IC could also play a role in this setting. The value of resecting the residual mass after IC and before RT is not yet clear in this context.

METHODS

We present the results of a retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Between 1984 and 2001, 113 patients (patients) with T4b-SCHNC were treated at our institution with IC. Four patients dead during IC and 57 patients achieved a complete or a >90% partial response at primary and proceeded to definitive RT (or concomitant CT/RT). Surgical resection was reconsidered after IC and before RT in the other 52 patients. Surgery was performed in 13 of them: in 7 patients resection was R1, all of them had loco-regional progression (2 also developed systemic metastases) and median OS after surgery was 21 months, with no patient alive at 48 months. In the other 6 patients a R0 resection was performed: 3 of these patients had loco-regional relapses (1 also developed systemic metastases) and the other 3 patients remain alive and disease free 56, 62 and 72 months after surgery. Considering the 52 patients that achieved less than a 90% partial response at primary with IC, overall survival was equivalent when no Resection or an R1 resection was performed after IC (5 year OS 8 vs. 0%, lrk, p=0.74), but a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed when an R0 resection was obtained (5 years OS 50%, lrk, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

R0 resections after IC and before RT could indicate an improvement in OS in patients with T4b-SCHNC that obtain less than a 90% PR at primary after IC. We consider that this approach deserves further research in prospective clinical trials.

Current situation of Panitumumab, Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab

EGFR overexpression usually correlates with a more advanced disease stage, a poorer prognosis and a worse chemotherapy response. EGFR expression increase has been observed in many tumours. For all the aforementioned reasons, EGFR inhibition can be considered an attractive approach in cancer treatment. One strategy has been receptor inhibition of extracellular domain using monoclonal antibodies. Cetuximab is the most developed one and there is plenty information on the literature about its current status. In this review we focus on other EGFR monoclonal antibodies under clinical development. The more developed one is Panitumumab. Its clinical development is taking place very quickly and it has mainly been studied in colorectal cancer showing promising results. There are also other interesting drugs such as Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab.