The somatostatin receptor family

The diverse biological effects of somatostatin (SST) are mediated through a family of G protein coupled receptors of which 5 members have been recently identified by molecular cloning. This review focuses on the molecular biology, pharmacology, expression, and function of these receptors with particular emphasis on the human (h) homologs. hSSTRs are encoded by a family of 5 genes which map to separate chromosomes and which, with one exception, are intronless. SSTR2 gives rise to spliced variants, SSTR2A and 2B. hSSTR1-4 display weak selectivity for SST-14 binding whereas hSSTR5 is SST-28 selective. Based on structural similarity and reactivity for octapeptide and hexapeptide SST analogs, hSSTR2,3, and 5 belong to a similar SSTR subclass. hSSTR1 and 4 react poorly with these analogs and belong to a separate subclass. All 5 hSSTRs are functionally coupled to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase via pertussis toxin sensitive GTP binding proteins. Some of the subtypes are also coupled to tyrosine phosphatase (SSTR1,2), Ca2+ channels (SSTR2), Na+/H+ exchanger (SSTR1), PLA-2 (SSTR4), and MAP kinase (SSTR4). mRNA for SSTR1-5 is widely expressed in brain and peripheral organs and displays an overlapping but characteristic pattern that is subtype-selective, and tissue- and species-specific. Pituitary and islet tumors express several SSTR genes suggesting that multiple SSTR subtypes are coexpressed in the same cell. Structure-function studies indicate that the core residues in SST-14 ligand Phe6-Phe11 dock within a ligand binding pocket located in TMDs 3-7 which is lined by hydrophobic and charged amino acid residues.

Somatostatin inhibits B-cell secretion via a subtype-2 somatostatin receptor in the isolated perfused human pancreas

Recently five somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR) have been cloned, allowing the development of highly specific selective agonists for these SSTR. The present study was undertaken to determine which SSTR is responsible for the inhibitory effect of somatostatin on islet hormone secretion. Single-pass perfusion of four agonists was performed in pancreata obtained from four cadaveric organ donors using a modified Krebs-media with 3.9 mM glucose. Sequential 10-min specific receptor agonist infusions (5 ng/ml) of DC32-87 (SSTR2), DC25-12 (SSTR3), DC32-97 (SSTR3), or DC32-92 (SSTR5) were performed in random order separated by 10-min basal periods. Infusion of SSTR2 agonist into the isolated perfused human pancreas resulted in a significant inhibition of insulin and C-peptide secretion (insulin = -1468 +/- 480 pM, P < 0.05, and C-peptide = -2328 +/- 437 pM, P < 0.05) but not islet amyloid polypeptide or somatostatin. These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of somatostatin on B-cell secretion is mediated through the subtype-2 receptor within the human islet.

Functional effects of D-Phe-c[Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Val-Cys]-Trp-NH2 and differential changes in somatostatin receptor messenger RNAs, binding sites and somatostatin release in kainic acid-treated rats

In situ hybridization histochemistry for somatostatin receptors-1, -2, -3 and -4 section and receptor autoradiography using [125I]CGP 23996, [125I]somatostatin-28, [125I]seglitide and [125I]Tyr3 octreotide were carried out to determine the expression of somatostatin receptor messenger RNAs and binding sites in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of rats 21 days following generalized limbic seizures induced by subcutaneous injection of 12mg/kg kainic acid. In control rats, somatostatin-1 to somatostatin-4 receptor messenger RNAs were found in the pyramidal layer and granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus. After kainate treatment, the CA1 subfield displayed a selective decrease in somatostatin-3 and somatostatin-4 receptor hybridization signals of 35 and 41%, respectively, whereas no changes were observed in the remaining hippocampal areas. Somatostatin-1 and somatostatin-2 receptor messenger RNA expression in the hippocampus remained unaffected by kainate treatment. No effect of kainate was observed in the expression of somatostatin receptor messenger RNAs in the cerebral cortex. In control rats, the selective somatostatin-2 receptor ligands, [125I]seglitide and [125I]Tyr3 octreotide and the non-selective somatostatin receptor ligands [125I]CGP 23996 and [125I]somatostatin-28, labelled preferentially the stratum oriens and radiatum CA1, the granule and molecular layers of the dentate gyrus and the deep layers of the cerebral cortex. [125I]somatostatin-28 and [125I]CGP 23996 labelled sites were selectively decreased by 32 and 39%, respectively, in the stratum radiatum CA1 after kainate treatment. [125I]CGP 23996 binding was also decreased by 35% in the stratum oriens CA1 and by 36% on average in the stratum oriens and radiatum CA3. [125I]seglitide and [125I]Tyr3 octreotide binding was not affected by kainate in any hippocampal region. The granule and molecular layers of the hippocampus and the layers IV-VI of the cerebral cortex did not show changes in binding sites for any of the radioligands analysed. A 18 and 35% decrease in the spontaneous and 50 mM KCl-induced somatostatin release from hippocampal slices was found two days after kainate, a likely reflection of neuronal cell loss. No differences in somatostatin release were observed 21 days after kainate treatment. At this latter time, the rats had an enhanced susceptibility to tonic-clonic seizures induced by intraperitoneal injection of 30 mg/kg pentylenetetrazol, a subconvulsant dose in naive rats. Bilateral infusion of 6 micrograms RC 160, a selective somatostatin-2 receptor agonist, in the dentate gyrus 21 days after kainate, significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the number of animals with tonic-clonic seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Inhibition of cell proliferation by the somatostatin analogue RC-160 is mediated by somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR2 and SSTR5 through different mechanisms

Effects of the stable somatostatin analogue RC-160 on cell proliferation, tyrosine phosphatase activity, and intracellular calcium concentration were investigated in CHO cells expressing the five somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR1 to -5. Binding experiments were performed on crude membranes by using [125I-labeled Tyr11] somatostatin-14; RC-160 exhibited moderate-to-high affinities for SSTR2, -3, and -5 (IC50, 0.17, 0.1 and 21 nM, respectively) and low affinity for SSTR1 and -4 (IC50, 200 and 620 nM, respectively). Cell proliferation was induced in CHO cells by 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum, 1 microM insulin, or 0.1 microM cholecystokinin (CCK)-8; RC-160 inhibited serum-induced proliferation of CHO cells expressing SSTR2 and SSTR5 (EC50, 53 and 150 pM, respectively) but had no effect on growth of cells expressing SSTR1, -3, or -4. In SSTR2-expressing cells, orthovanadate suppressed the growth inhibitory effect of RC-160. This analogue inhibited insulin-induced proliferation and rapidly stimulated the activity of a tyrosine phosphatase in only this cellular clone. This latter effect was observed at doses of RC-160 (EC50, 4.6 pM) similar to those required to inhibit growth (EC50, 53 pM) and binding to the receptor (IC50, 170 pM), implicating tyrosine phosphatase as a transducer of the growth inhibition signal in SSTR2-expressing cells. In SSTR5-expressing cells, the phosphatase pathway was not involved in the inhibitory effect of RC-160 on cell growth, since this action was not influenced by tyrosine and serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitors. In addition, in SSTR5-expressing cells, RC-160 inhibited CCK-stimulated intracellular calcium mobilization at doses (EC50, 0.35 nM) similar to those necessary to inhibit somatostatin-14 binding (IC50, 21 nM) and CCK-induced cell proliferation (EC50, 1.1 nM). This suggests that the inositol phospholipid/calcium pathway could be involved in the antiproliferative effect of RC-160 mediated by SSTR5 in these cells. RC-160 had no effect on the basal or carbachol-stimulated calcium concentration in cells expressing SSTR1 to -4. Thus, we conclude that SSTR2 and SSTR5 bind RC-160 with high affinity and mediate the RC-160-induced inhibition of cell growth by distinct mechanisms.

Activation of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 inhibits acid secretion in rats

Somatostatin is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. Recently, at least five distinct somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR) have been characterized and evaluated using relatively selective peptide analogues of somatostatin. We sought to determine which somatostatin receptor subtypes are involved in peripheral regulation of gastric acid secretion. Fasted, male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and were implanted with a double-lumen cannula in the stomach. Acid secretion was measured in gastric samples collected every 10 min by backtitration to pH 7. After a 30-min basal period, a 2-h intravenous infusion of pentagastrin (24 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 i.v.) was started. During the second pentagastrin hour, a 1-h intravenous infusion of either vehicle (0.1% canine serum albumin in 0.9% saline) or somatostatin receptor agonists was begun. The somatostatin receptor agonists included peptides with relative specificity for SSTR1-5 (somatostatin-14; 10 nmol.kg-1.h-1); SSTR2, SSTR3, and SSTR5 [SMS-(201-995); 10 nmol.kg-1.h-1]; SSTR2 (1-1,000 nmol.kg-1.h-1); SSTR3 (10-1,000 nmol.kg-1.h-1); and SSTR5 (10-1,000 nmol.kg-1.h-1). The SSTR2 agonist decreased pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion dose dependently, from 82 +/- 7% of maximum acid output at 1 nmol.kg-1.h-1 to 4 +/- 7% of maximum at 100 nmol.kg-1.h-1. At 10 nmol.kg-1.h-1, the SSTR2 agonist inhibited acid secretion (40 +/- 7% of maximum) similarly to somatostatin (37 +/- 4% of maximum) and SMS-(201-995) (31 +/- 4% of maximum). The SSTR2 agonist inhibited acid secretion approximately 10- to 100-fold more potently than either the SSTR3 or the SSTR5 agonist. These results indicate that somatostatin regulates gastric acid secretion by activation of SSTR2 receptors.

Expression of mRNA for all five human somatostatin receptors (hSSTR1-5) in pituitary tumors

Expression of mRNA for hSSTR1-5 was determined in secretory (GH, PRL, TSH, ACTH) and nonsecretory pituitary tumors, as well as normal human fetal and adult pituitary by reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR followed by Southern blots. All 5 hSSTR subtype mRNAs were expressed in fetal pituitary, while adult pituitary was positive for 4 subtypes, lacking hSSTR4 mRNA. All 15 tumors analyzed were positive for SSTR mRNA, 14 expressing more than one subtype. SSTR2 mRNA in all tissues was expressed as the 2A variant, there being no detectable transcript for SSTR2B. Amongst the 5 SSTRs, mRNA for SSTR2A was the most frequently expressed (87% of tumors) followed by SSTR1 (73%), SSTR3 (53%), SSTR5 (47%), and SSTR4 (40%). The frequency and pattern of expression of the SSTR mRNAs was virtually identical in the different tumor subclasses and did not correlate with tumor size. Since pituitary tumors are monoclonal in origin, multiple SSTR genes are expressed in individual cells. Most tumors are rich in SSTR1 and SSTR2A mRNA compared to the other subtypes. This implies that SST analogs like SMS 201-995, known to interact with SSTR2A, but not with SSTR1, act on pituitary tumors mainly via the SSTR2 subtype.

Molecular pharmacology of somatostatin receptors

The neuropeptide somatostatin (SRIF) is widely expressed in the brain and in the periphery in two main forms, SRIF-14 and SRIF-28. Similarly, the presence of SRIF receptors throughout the whole body has been reported. SRIF produces a variety of effects including modulation of hormone release (e.g. GH, glucagon, insulin), of neurotransmitter release (e.g. acetylcholine, dopamine, 5-HT), and its own release is modulated by many neurotransmitters. SRIF affects cognitive and behavioural processes, the endocrine system, the gastrointestinal tract and the cardiovascular system and also has tumor growth inhibiting effects. Initially, two classes of SRIF receptors have been proposed on the basis of biochemical and functional studies. However, the recent cloning of five putative SRIF receptor subtypes which belong to the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily suggests that SRIF mediates its various effects via a whole family of receptors. Here we review, in this new context, the molecular pharmacology of the SRIF receptor subtypes present in the brain and in the periphery, and address the question of nomenclature of SRIF receptors.