The impact of Medicare eligibility on cancer screening behaviors

INTRODUCTION

Lack of health insurance limits access to preventive services, including cancer screening. We examined the effects of Medicare eligibility on the appropriate use of cancer screening services in the United States.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor and Surveillance System (analyzed in 2014). Univariable and logistic regression analyses were performed for participants aged 60-64 and 66-70 to examine the effects of Medicare eligibility on prevalence of self-reported screening for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers. Sub-analyses were performed among low-income (<$25,000 annual/household) individuals.

RESULTS

Medicare-eligible individuals were significantly more likely to undergo all examined preventive services (colorectal cancer OR: 1.90; 95% CI 1.79-2.04; prostate cancer OR: 1.29; 95% CI 1.17-1.43; breast cancer OR: 1.23; 95% CI 1.10-1.37) and the effect was most pronounced among low-income individuals (colorectal cancer OR: 2.04; 95% CI 1.8-2.32; prostate cancer OR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.72; breast cancer OR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.67). Access to a healthcare provider was the strongest independent predictor of undergoing appropriate screening, ranging from OR 2.73 (95% CI 2.20-3.39) for colorectal cancer screening in the low-income population to OR 4.79 (95% CI 3.95-5.81) for breast cancer screening in the overall cohort. The difference in screening prevalence was most pronounced when comparing Medicare-eligible participants to uninsured Medicare-ineligible participants (+33.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare eligibility impacts the prevalence of cancer screening, likely as a result of increased access to primary care. Low-income individuals benefit most from Medicare eligibility. Expanded public insurance coverage to these individuals may improve access to preventive services.

Trends of acute kidney injury after radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence, temporal trends, and predictors of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in a large cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with radical or partial nephrectomy.

METHODS

Between January 1998 and December 2010, patients who underwent radical or partial tumor nephrectomy were identified within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. First, prevalence and temporal trends of AKI were analyzed. Second, predictors of AKI were identified using multivariable regression analyses. Third, associations between AKI and in-hospital complications, length of stay, hospital costs, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated using logistic regression models adjusted for clustering.

RESULTS

Of total 253,046 patients, 5.5% (14,303 in radical and 3,525 in partial nephrectomy) experienced AKI. Rates of AKI significantly increased from 2.0% in 1998 to 10.4% in 2010 (P<0.001). Predictors of AKI included male sex, radical nephrectomy, more contemporary years (2004-2010), older age, black race, higher comorbidities, higher preoperative chronic kidney disease stage, Medicare insurance status, and nephrectomy at urban hospitals (all P<0.01). Postoperative AKI during hospitalization was associated with an increased rate of in-hospital mortality, any complications, transfusion, prolonged length of stay, and higher hospital costs (all P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rising rates of in-hospital AKI after radical and partial nephrectomy were observed. Increasing awareness of AKI, identification of patients at risk before surgery, early postoperative AKI diagnosis, collaboration with nephrologists, implementation of renoprotective strategies, long-term renal functional follow-up, and a well-designed prospective study, may be warranted.