What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

BACKGROUND

A web-based survey was conducted among colorectal surgeons who represented members of both SAGES and ASCRS to find out how they define conversion for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Questionnaires were designed based on MCQs, including three parts: surgeon information, different definitions for conversion, and four different clinical scenarios. Surgeons were asked to choose the best definition(s).

RESULTS

325 (28.5%) of 1,140 surgeons, 28.5% responded; approximately half of them were part of private-based practices. Fifty-three percent had more than 10 years experience; 35.9% performed more than 50 laparoscopic colon cases per year, 12% performed more than 25 laparoscopic rectal cases per year, and 60% less than 10. The majority (68.4%) agreed that any incision made earlier than planned is conversion. Whereas 81.4% felt that incision >5 cm is not a conversion, only 53.4% considered incision >10 cm a conversion, and 37% did not. Neither extracorporeal vessel ligation (73.8%), bowel resection (81.2%), anastomosis (77%), or incision made for specimen retrieval (91.1%) was counted as conversion. In clinical case scenarios, 62% found an incision made to facilitate phlegmon dissection after laparoscopically mobilizing the left colon up to and around the splenic flexure to be laparoscopic-assisted. A 10-cm incision required for fistula take down after finishing laparoscopic dissection was defined as conversion (55.6%). A 10-cm incision made for the rectal dissection in rectopexy was described as conversion in 51% and laparoscopic-assisted in 48%. Increasing a 5-12-cm for specimen extraction, 49.3% was declared a laparoscopic-assisted case.

CONCLUSIONS

It was considered clear that any incision made earlier than planned a conversion, whereas extra corporeal vessel ligation, bowel resection and anastomosis were not. However, there seem to be many views of conversion regarding incision length, and some clinical situations that might influence outcome among different centers.

The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference

BACKGROUND

Despite the significant benefits of laparoscopic surgery, limitations still exist. One of these limitations is the loss of several degrees of freedom. Robotic surgery has allowed surgeons to regain the two lost degrees of freedom by introducing wristed laparoscopic instruments.

METHODS

At the first Pelvic Surgery Meeting held in Brescia in June 2007, the participants focused on the role of robotic surgery in pelvic operations surgery for malignancy including prostate, rectal, uterine, and cervical carcinoma. All members of the interdisciplinary panel were asked to define the role of robotic surgery in prostate, rectal, and uterine carcinoma. All key statements were reformulated until a consensus within the group was achieved (Murphy et al., Health Technol Assess 2(i-v):1-88, 1998). For the systematic review, a comprehensive literature search was performed in Medline and the Cochrane Library from January 1997 to June 2007. The keywords used were Da Vinci, telemonitoring, laparoscopy, neoplasms for urology, colorectal, gynecology, visceral surgery, and minimally invasive surgery. The pelvic surgery meeting was supported by Olympus Medical Systems Europa.

RESULTS

As of December 31, 2007, there were 795 unit shipments worldwide of the Da Vinci((R)): 595 in North America, 136 in Europe, and 64 in the rest of the world (http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-faq#22324 ). It was estimated that, during 2007, approximately 50,000 radical prostatectomies were performed with the Da Vinci robot system in the USA, reflecting market penetration of 60% of radical prostatectomies in the USA. This utilization represents 50% growth as in 2006 only 42% of all radical prostatectomies performed in the USA employed robotics.

CONCLUSION

While robotic prostatectomy has become the most widely accepted method of prostatectomy, robotic hysterectomy and proctectomy remain far less widely accepted. The theoretical benefits of the increased degrees of freedom and three-dimensional visualization may be outweighed in these areas by the loss of haptic feedback, increased operative times, and increased cost.

Imbrication of the external anal sphincter may yield similar functional results as overlapping repair in selected patients

OBJECTIVE

Overlapping external anal sphincter repair is the preferred procedure for incontinent patients with functional yet anatomically disrupted anterior external anal sphincter. When incomplete disruption, thinning or technically difficult mobilization of the external anal sphincter occurs, imbrication without division may be the more feasible surgical option. The aim of the study was to assess retrospectively the indications for external anal sphincter imbrication in patients who underwent either overlapping external anal sphincter repair or external anal sphincter imbrication, and to compare the success rates.

METHOD

Patients who had external anal sphincter repair and follow up of at least 3 months were studied. Fecal incontinence was measured using the validated Wexner fecal Incontinence Scoring system (0 = perfect continence, 20 = complete incontinence); postoperative scores 0-10 were interpreted as successful, and scores of 11-20 as failures.

RESULTS

A total of 131 females who had anal sphincter repair between 1988 and 2000 were analysed. One hundred and twenty-one patients had overlapping external anal sphincter repair (group I), and 10 had external anal sphincter imbrication (group II). Indications for external anal sphincter imbrication were attenuation of the external anal sphincter without overt defect (n = 5), partial disruption of external anal sphincter with muscle fibres bridging the scar (n = 2), thick bulk of scar between the muscle edges (n = 2), and wide lateral retraction of the muscle edges (n = 1). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups relative to preoperative incontinence score (16.5 vs 16.5, P = 0.99), pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment (left 9.6%vs 0.0%, P = 0.19; right 13.4%vs 11.1%, P = 0.84), and extent of electromyography pathology (61%vs 47%, P = 0.30). The patients in group I were younger than those in group II (mean age 50.8 years vs. 61.7 years, respectively; P = 0.052) and the length of follow-up was significantly longer (32.3 months vs 14.3 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). Both procedures had similar success rates (59.5%vs 60%; P = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Imbrication of the external anal sphincter may yield similar results as overlapping external anal sphincter repair in patients with incomplete external anal sphincter disruptions, external anal sphincter attenuation, and in patients presenting with wide lateral retraction of the muscle edges.

Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that the concept of compression anastomosis has been investigated for nearly 2 centuries, it has not yet achieved widespread acceptance. The aim of the current report is to review the literature regarding compression anastomoses.

DATA SOURCES

A multi-database search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Databases (all until June 2007), in addition to electronic links to related articles and references of selected articles. The following terms were used for the search in various combinations: anastomosis, anastomoses, sutureless, compression, nickel-titanium; Nitinol; CAC; CAR; AKA-2, Valtrac biofragmentable anastomotic ring, BAR. Language restrictions were not applied.

CONCLUSIONS

The various methods of compression anastomosis have been shown to be at least comparable to the standard techniques of suturing and stapling. The measurement of outcomes, including cost, safety, and efficacy of treatment, indicated that compression anastomosis can save time, is cost-effective, and offers an acceptable cost/benefit ratio compared to both stapled and sutured anastomoses. However, compression anastomosis did not gain worldwide popularity.

Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults

Bowel preparation has been a much-debated issue for both colonoscopy and for colorectal surgery. While bowel preparation for colonoscopy is clearly mandatory for optimal intraluminal visualization, bowel preparation for surgery has recently been challenged. This review evaluates oral bowel preparation, based on evidence in the literature, in order to provide a practical guide for physicians and practitioners about oral bowel cleansing preparations in current use for both colonoscopy and for colorectal surgery.A MEDLINE search, limited to publications in English language, was done through Ovid including articles published from 1966 to 2007 about bowel preparation using terms 'pre-operative care' and 'colonoscopy' or 'surgical procedure' associated with 'polyethylene glycol' and 'sodium phosphate'. The references lists from the identified articles were also included in the review. No bowel preparation method meets the ideal criteria for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. However, polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) and sodium phosphate are the most commonly used bowel preparations before colonoscopy and colon surgery. Both preparations are safely used and effective; however, some precautions should be considered, particularly with sodium phosphate. In addition, the efficacy of low-volume PEG-ELS can be improved by the addition of preparation adjuncts. Timing and dose are important considerations regardless of the method used. Mechanical bowel preparation for surgery has been questioned, and shown to have no extra benefits and possibly the association with increased morbidity. Regardless of the evidence, there are many randomized controlled trials showing the lack of benefit of mechanical bowel preparation.

An Incremental Step in Patient Safety: Reducing the Risks of Retained Foreign Bodies by the Use of an Integrated Laparotomy Pad/Retractor

Retained foreign body is a recognized complication of abdominal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery and a cause of medical malpractice. Efforts to reduce its incidence include safe exposure and the use of fewer laparotomy pads. The EZ DASH is an absorbent 12-thickness laparotomy pad covering a malleable stainless steel mesh, providing both the needed retraction and a reduction in the use of individual pads. EZ DASH has been introduced into clinical use in 183 consecutive cases by specialty surgeons (colorectal, gynecology, and gynecologic oncology services) at multiple medical centers. The retractor may be shaped to the individual needs of an operating field, eg, the pelvis, and the small bowel secured behind the retractor, held in place by the tension of its mesh and the security of the abdominal wall. Positioning has been intuitive and secure, and the intraoperative use of sponges and of operating time have both been noticeably reduced. Among 183 cases, 91% of uses were felt to reduce OR time by ≤5 to ≥10 minutes. Ninety-three percent of EZ DASH cases used fewer individual laparotomy pads for small bowel retraction. Ninety-five percent of uses suggested a value added to the case by the operating surgeon with an expressed desire to use the product repeatedly. The EZ DASH is a simple method of obtaining small bowel retraction and laparotomy pad absorption with a reduction in the need for individual pads, providing excellent exposure for the operative field and reducing the risk of retained foreign body.

19th Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium

The 19th Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium, hosted by the Cleveland Clinic Florida provided a comprehensive update of all aspects of colorectal disease. The course was geared towards physicians, residents and allied health professionals. The diverse program attracted a wide range of participants and also provided a unique opportunity to discuss the latest developments in colorectal surgery with numerous US and international leaders in the field.

Prophylactic ureteric catheters in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of ureteric catheter placement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to assess the morbidity related to this procedure.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2001, 313 elective laparoscopic colorectal surgeries were performed. Patients with and without ureteric catheters were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Catheter placement was attempted in 149 patients (catheter group) and was not attempted in 164 (controls). There were no significant differences between groups in the number of patients with prior colorectal resection (p=0.286) or other abdominal surgery (p=0.074). Crohn's disease and diverticulitis were more common in the catheter group than among controls (p<0.001). Concomitant intra-abdominal fistula or abscess was present in 29 patients (19.5%) in the catheter group vs. 14 (8.5%) in the control group (p=0.005). The duration of surgery was longer in the catheter group (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in conversion, duration of bladder catheter placement, or length of hospital stay. Urinary tract infection occurred in 3 patients (2.0%) in the catheter group and 7 (4.3%) in the control group (p=0.257) and urinary retention occurred in 3 patients (2.0%) and 11 patients (6.7%), respectively (p=0.045). No intraoperative ureteric injuries occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Ureteric catheter placement was successful in most cases and was not associated with intraoperative injuries. The increased length of surgery in patients with ureteric catheter placement may attest to the increased severity of pathology in these patients.

Laparoscopic diverticular resection with situs inversus totalis (SIT): report of a case

Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare condition where the abdominal and thoracic cavity structures are opposite of their usual position. Laparoscopic colonic surgery for this patient population is not well described, with only 2 reported cases. Our patient was a 62-year-old female with a history of SIT who underwent a laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis. The procedure included the use of 4 ports. The sigmoid colon was noted on the right side. Laparoscopic resection with stapled anastomosis was performed. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home on postoperative day 5 without complications. We present a third case of laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis in a patient with SIT and a description of the operative procedure.

Faecal incontinence in male patients

OBJECTIVE

Data concerning faecal incontinence (FI) in men are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the historical aetiology and contrast aetiologies in younger and older men suffering from FI.

METHOD

After institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients with FI seen between 1999 and 2005. The data of male patients was further analysed to assess the impact of age and historical aetiology on FI.

RESULTS

A total of 404 males were included, 203 patients were <70 years of age (group A) and 201 patients were >or=70 years of age (group B). The most common prior diagnosis in group A was perianal sepsis in 23 (11.3%) patients and symptomatic haemorrhoids in 20 (9.9%) patients; in group B it was prostate cancer in 57 (28.4%) patients, symptomatic haemorrhoids in 31 (15.4%) patients and neurological diseases in 18 (9%) patients. The most common prior procedure in group A was restorative proctectomy/proctocolectomy in 32 (15.8%) patients, fistulotomy or haemorrhoidectomy in 21 (10.3%) and 19 (9.4%) patients respectively. In group B, radiation therapy for prostate cancer was utilized in 48 (23.9%) patients and haemorrhoidectomy in 29 (14.4%) patients. Comparing group A and group B relative to diagnosis - perianal sepsis, perineal trauma, congenital disorders, HIV infection and anal cancer were more common in group A, whereas prostate cancer, neurological diseases and colon cancer were significantly more common in group B.

CONCLUSION

Prostate cancer, symptomatic haemorrhoids, perianal sepsis, rectal cancer and a history of restorative rectal resection were common associations with FI in men. The aetiologies for FI in men vary with age.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare disorder often misdiagnosed as a malignant ulcer. Histopathological features of SRUS are characteristic and pathognomonic; nevertheless, the endoscopic and clinical presentations may be confusing. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes in patients who suffer from SRUS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was undertaken, from January 1989 to May 2005 for all patients who were diagnosed with SRUS. Data recorded included: patient's age, gender, clinical presentation, past surgical history, diagnostic and preoperative workup, operative procedure, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 23 patients were diagnosed with SRUS. Seven patients received only medical treatment, and in three patients, the ulcer healed after medical treatment. Sixteen patients underwent surgical treatment. In four patients, the symptoms persisted after surgery. Two patients presented with postoperative rectal bleeding requiring surgical intervention. Three patients developed late postoperative sexual dysfunction. One patient continued suffering from rectal pain after a colostomy was constructed. Median follow-up was 14 (range 2-84) months.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show clearly that every patient with SRUS must be assessed individually. Initial treatment should include conservative measures. In patients with refractory symptoms, surgical treatment should be considered. Results of anterior resection and protocolectomy are satisfactory for solitary rectal ulcer.

Systematic guide to complex cases from adhesive disease

Intestinal adhesions are inevitable after abdominal surgery. The presence of intra-abdominal adhesions can create very complex situations which require careful preoperative planning, meticulous intra-operative technique and detailed postoperative management. This manuscript will review the management of these complex cases of adhesions.

Adhesions and colorectal surgery - call for action

Mounting evidence highlights that adhesions are now the most frequent complication of abdominopelvic surgery, yet many surgeons are still not aware of the extent of the problem and its serious consequences. While many patients go through life without apparent problems, adhesions are the major cause of small bowel obstruction and a leading cause of infertility and chronic pelvic pain in women. Moreover, adhesions complicate future abdominal surgery with important associated morbidity and expense and a considerable risk of mortality. Studies have shown that despite advances in surgical techniques in recent years, the burden of adhesion-related complications has not changed. Adhesiolysis remains the main treatment even though adhesions reform in most patients. Recent developments in adhesion-reduction strategies and new anti-adhesion agents do, however, offer a realistic possibility of reducing the risk of adhesions forming and potentially improving the clinical outcomes for patients and reducing the associated onward burden to healthcare systems. This paper provides a synopsis of the impact and extent of the problem of adhesions with reference to the wider literature and also consideration of the key note papers presented in this special supplement to Colorectal Disease. It considers the evidence of the risk of adhesions in colorectal surgery and the opportunities and strategies for improvement. The paper acts as a 'call for action' to colorectal surgeons to make prevention of adhesions more of a priority and importantly to inform patients of the risks associated with adhesion-related complications during the consent process.

Multimedia article. Recurrent postoperative perineal hernia: transperineal redo mesh repair

Postoperative perineal hernia is a rare complication after abdominoperineal resection or pelvic exenteration. In this video article, we describe one technique of transperineal mesh repair of recurrent symptomatic perineal hernia after previous transabdominal mesh repair of the hernia developed after abdominoperineal resection. To date, this redo mesh repair is the only report that we could find in the English literature.

Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

BACKGROUND

The steadily increasing age of the population mandates that potential benefits of new techniques and technologies be considered for older patients.

AIM

To analyze the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic (LAP) colorectal surgery in elderly compared to younger patients, and to patients who underwent laparotomy (OP).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent elective sigmoid colectomies for diverticular disease or ileo-colic resections for benign disorders; patients with stomas were excluded. There were two groups: age < 65 years (A) and age >or= 65 years (B). Parameters included demographics, body mass index (BMI), length of operation (LO), incision length (LI), length of hospitalization (LOS), morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

641 patients (M/F - 292/349) were included between July 1991 and June 2006; 407 in group A and 234 in group B. There were significantly more LAP procedures in group A (244/407 - 60%) than in group B (106/234 - 45%) - p = 0.0003. Conversion rates were similar: 61/244 (25%) in group A, and 25/106 (24%) in group B (p = 0.78). There was no difference in LO between the groups in any type of operation. LOS was shorter in patients in group A who underwent OP: 7.1 (3-17) days versus 8.7 (4-22) days in group B (p <0.0001), and LAP: 5.3 (2-19) days versus 6.4 (2-34) days in group B (p = 0.01). In both groups LOS in the LAP group was significantly shorter than in OP group. There were no significant differences in major complications or mortality between the two groups; however, the complication rates in the OP groups were significantly higher than in LAP and CON combined (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients who undergo LAP have a significantly shorter LOS and fewer complications compared to elderly patients who undergo OP. Laparoscopy should be considered in all patients in whom ileo-colic or sigmoid resection is planned regardless of age.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum in ulcerative colitis: case report and review of the literature

The majority of colorectal carcinomas diagnosed are adenocarcinomas. Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the rectum are rare tumors, and were reported as rare complication of inflammatory bowel disease. Surgery is the most effective therapy; and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy should also be considered. We report two cases of ulcerative colitis-associated SCC of the rectum. The lesions were treated with chemoradiotherapy with complete response.

Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients' outcome and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopy in the management of acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction (AASBO). However, comparative data with laparotomy are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopy and laparotomy for the treatment of AASBO in terms of patient outcome and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgery for AASBO from 1999 to 2005 was conducted. Data recorded included operative and postoperative course, among others. Operative and total hospital charges were estimated from the Patient Accounting System.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients who underwent laparoscopy were matched to a similar group of patients who underwent laparotomy. In the laparoscopy group, four patients (13%) had a laparoscopy-assisted procedure and ten patients (32%) were converted. The laparoscopy group was subdivided into laparoscopy, laparoscopy-assisted, converted, and assisted-converted subgroups. In the majority of the patients, AASBO was secondary to a single band. Overall morbidity was significantly higher in the laparotomy group (p = 0.007). Morbidity rates were statistically significant between the laparoscopy and assisted-converted subgroups (p = 0.0001) but not between the laparotomy group and assisted-converted subgroup (p = 0.19). Median hospital stay and median time to first bowel movement were significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group. Charge data were available for only the last three years of the study. Operative charges and total hospital charges were similar between the laparoscopy and the laparotomy groups (p = 0.14 and p = 0.10, respectively). There was a significant difference in total hospital charges between the laparoscopy subgroup and laparotomy group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy for AASBO is associated with reduced hospital stay, early recovery, and decreased morbidity. Laparoscopy-assisted and converted surgeries do not differ significantly from laparotomy in regard to patient outcome. Operative and total hospital charges are similar for both laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Should ileoanal pouch surgery be staged for patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis on immunosuppressives?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Much debate has revolved around whether patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) receiving immunosuppression should be weaned off immunosuppressives before undergoing ileal pouch surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the affect of immunosuppressive drugs on postoperative complications after ileoanal pouch surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective medical record review of patients with MUC who underwent ileal pouch surgery while taking immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), methotrexate, and cyclosporin A was performed. Postoperative complications in the study group were compared to three matched groups: patients with MUC who had ileoanal pouch surgery while taking systemic steroids, patients with MUC not receiving any immunosuppressive drugs, and patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with MUC who underwent ileoanal pouch surgery while taking immunosuppressive drugs were identified from a prospectively entered database of patients who had this surgery between 1988 and 2005. All but two patients underwent temporary fecal diversion. Fifteen patients were taking 6-MP or azathioprine; six were on cyclosporine A, and one both on azathioprine and cyclosporine A. Fifteen patients were also taking steroids at the time of ileoanal pouch surgery. Early (within 30 days of surgery) and late complications occurred in 36 and 50% of the study group patients, respectively, but did not significantly differ from a matched group of patients with MUC who did not take immunosuppressive drugs. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis had a significantly lower long-term complication rate.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective case-matched study suggests that the use of immunosuppressive drugs and cyclosporine A may not be associated with an increased rate of complications after ileoanal pouch surgery.

Anorectal three-dimensional endosonography and anal manometry in assessing anterior rectocele in women: a new pathogenesis concept and the basic surgical principle

OBJECTIVE

The anatomy of the anal canal, the anorectal junction and the lower rectum was studied with 3-D ultrasound.

METHOD

Seventeen women with normal bowel transit, without rectocele (group 1) and 17 female patients with a large anterior rectocele (group 2) were examined with a B&K Medical Rawk. Mean age was 44.5 and 51.6 years respectively. In group 1, one (5.8%) patient was nuliparous, five (29.4%) had a caesarian section, 11 (64.7%) had a vaginal delivery while in group 2, two (11.7%) patients were nuliparous, four (23.5%) had a caesarian section and 11 (64.7%) had a vaginal delivery. Images were reconstructed in midline longitudinal (ML) and transverse (T) planes. The external (EAS) and internal (IAS) anal sphincters were measured in both projections.

RESULTS

In the ML plane, the EAS length was longer in group 1 (1.94 cm vs 1.61 cm, P < 0.05), the gap length was shorter (1.54 cm vs 1.0 cm P < 0.01) and the wall thickness was shorter in group 2 (0.40 cm vs 0.50 cm P < 0.01). The IAS (0.18 cm vs 0.23 cm P < 0.01) and EAS thickness (0.68 cm vs 0.77 cm, P < 0.05) (left lateral of the posterior quadrant) was greater in group 2. In group 1, the anterior upper anal canal wall in normal females was an extension of the rectal wall and the circular muscle was thicker in the mid-anal canal to form the IAS. In group 2, however, the wall layers were not identified and the IAS was found to be more distal. The differences were not statistically significant in the anal canal resting and squeeze pressures in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Obstetric trauma does not seem to play any role in rectocele pathogenesis because the anal sphincter muscles are anatomically and functionally normal and rectocele is also present in nuliparous and in women with caesarian sections. It seems that it is associated with the absence of EAS and thinner IAS in the anterior upper anal canal. Herniation starts at the upper anal canal extending to the lower rectum in high or large rectoceles and maybe produced by rectal intussusception because of excessive and prolonged straining during defecation. In fact, the denomination 'rectocele' should be changed to 'anorectocele'.