Tiotropium in children and adolescents with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a major cause of morbidity in children, despite the availability of various treatments. In adults, tiotropium-a long-acting muscarinic antagonist-as add-on therapy to an inhaled corticosteroid with or without a long-acting β₂-agonist provides clinical benefit with a safety profile similar to placebo.

OBJECTIVE

To review published evidence on the efficacy and safety of tiotropium as add-on a long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy in children and adolescents with asthma that is uncontrolled despite use of an inhaled corticosteroid with or without additional controller medication(s).

METHODS

We searched PubMed from inception until June 12, 2018, for randomized controlled trials of children and adolescents aged 1 to 17 years treated with tiotropium and reporting a primary outcome of any pulmonary function test and a secondary outcome of adverse events.

RESULTS

Overall, 7 randomized controlled trials of 1902 preschool children (aged 1-5 years; n = 102), school-age children (aged 6-11 years; n = 905), and adolescents (aged 12-17 years; n = 895) with moderate to severe asthma were included in the analysis. Once-daily tiotropium (5, 2.5, or 1.25 μg) improved lung function parameters, including peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second, vs placebo. Commonly reported adverse events across treatment groups included asthma worsening or exacerbations, decreased peak expiratory flow rate, nasopharyngitis, viral respiratory tract infection, and respiratory tract infection.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily tiotropium as add-on therapy is efficacious and safe in adolescents and children with moderate to severe asthma. These results support the expanded indication by regulatory authorities for add-on tiotropium in patients 6 years or older.

Dupilumab Efficacy in Patients with Uncontrolled, Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Asthma

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4 and IL-13, key drivers of type 2 inflammation, including IgE-mediated allergic inflammation in asthma. In the LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (NCT02414854) study, dupilumab reduced severe asthma exacerbations and improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma with greater efficacy observed in patients with elevated type 2 inflammatory biomarkers (blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide) at baseline.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed dupilumab's effect on key asthma outcomes in QUEST patients with/without evidence of allergic asthma (total serum IgE ≥30 IU/mL and ≥1 perennial aeroallergen-specific IgE ≥0.35 kU/L at baseline).

METHODS

Severe exacerbation rates and change from baseline in FEV₁, asthma control, and markers of type 2 inflammation during the 52-week treatment period were assessed.

RESULTS

In the allergic asthma subgroup (n = 1083), dupilumab 200/300 mg every 2 weeks versus placebo reduced severe asthma exacerbation rates (-36.9%/-45.5%; both P < .01), improved FEV₁ at week 12 (0.13 L/0.16 L; both P < .001; improvements were evident by the first evaluation at week 2) with greater efficacy observed in patients with elevated type 2 inflammatory biomarkers at baseline, and improved asthma control. Dupilumab treatment also resulted in rapid and sustained reductions in type 2 inflammatory biomarkers. Comparable results were observed in patients without evidence of allergic asthma (n = 819).

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab reduced severe exacerbation rates, improved FEV₁ and asthma control, and suppressed type 2 inflammatory biomarkers in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma with or without evidence of allergic asthma, highlighting the key role of IL-4 and IL-13 in airway inflammation.

Dupilumab Efficacy in Uncontrolled, Moderate-to-Severe Asthma with Self-Reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, key drivers of type 2 inflammation. In the phase 3 study (NCT02414854), add-on dupilumab 200 mg/300 mg every 2 weeks, versus placebo, significantly reduced severe asthma exacerbations and improved pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and quality-of-life measures in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma, with greater efficacy observed in those with a high baseline type 2 phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma with or without self-reported comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS or non-CRS).

METHODS

Comorbid CRS was self-reported by patients using an e-diary. Annualized severe exacerbation rates, changes from baseline in pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV₁, patient-reported outcomes, type 2 biomarkers, and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

CRS was self-reported by 382 of 1902 (20.1%) patients. Dupilumab 200 mg/300 mg reduced annualized severe exacerbation rates by 63%/61%, respectively, in patients with CRS, and by 42%/40% in patients without CRS (all P < .001 vs placebo). Dupilumab also improved lung function and patient-reported asthma control and quality of life, and suppressed type 2 biomarkers versus placebo in both subgroups. Clinical responses were rapid, with near-maximal responses observed at the earliest measured time points and sustained at week 52. Improvements observed in the CRS subgroup were similar to or numerically greater than those in the non-CRS subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab showed efficacy and was generally well tolerated in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma with or without CRS.

Symptoms and perception of airway obstruction in asthmatic patients: Clinical implications for use of reliever medications

BACKGROUND

Asthma causes the unpleasant sensation of breathlessness (dyspnea) caused by airway obstruction. Patients with poor perception of airway obstruction are at risk of delay in seeking medical attention and undertreatment, which can lead to avoidable deaths. Conversely, those with heightened perception are at risk of overtreatment and iatrogenic adverse effects with reliever medications, anxiety, and unnecessary use of health care resources.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to review evidence about symptom misperception in asthmatic patients and how to identify and manage affected patients, particularly with regard to reliever medications.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search for studies of perception of airway function in asthmatic patients. We searched the OVID (Medline and Medline [R] in process [PubMed]), Embase, and Adisearch/Odyssey databases, restricting our search to human studies published in English from 1990-2018, with no restrictions on age, sex, or racial origin.

RESULTS

We found that both underperception and overperception assessed during induced bronchoconstriction or bronchodilation or during changes in airway resistance were common across all age groups and that aging, disease severity, smoking, sex, ethnicity, psychologic factors, and medication are all associated with differences in perception. Importantly, airway inflammation was associated with impaired perception and a history of severe or near-fatal asthma. We also identified knowledge gaps, such as whether an individual patient's perception varies over time and the influence perception has on patients' use of reliever medication.

CONCLUSION

We found that abnormal perception of airway obstruction has important clinical implications for the management of patients with asthma.

Harmonization of Terminology for Tolerated and Reactive Dose in Food Allergy Immunotherapy

Currently, there is no Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for food allergy. Several new potential treatments are under investigation, including food allergen immunotherapy via various routes of administration, such as oral immunotherapy, epicutaneous immunotherapy, subcutaneous immunotherapy, and sublingual immunotherapy. The double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) has traditionally been used for diagnostic purposes, but extrapolation of the specific terminology used in food allergy diagnosis to interpretation of efficacy in clinical trials is incongruent and difficult to apply. There is a need for standardization of the terminology used in food allergy clinical trials, because inconsistencies can lead to potential misinterpretation of end points. The reactive dose, previously referred to as the eliciting dose, is defined as the dose given that induces the onset of unequivocal allergic symptoms, or the dose that stops the challenge based on physician discretion. Conversely, the single highest tolerated dose is defined as the highest dose given during a food challenge that elicits either no symptoms or symptoms that do not meet stopping criteria per the study protocol. The evolving field of food allergy provides a novel opportunity to define those end points that are most meaningful for patients, which is fundamental for successful implementation, education, and safety.

The Asthma Controller Step-down Yardstick

Asthma guidelines recommend a control-based approach to disease management in which the assessment of impairment and risk is linked to step-based therapy. Using this model, controller treatment is adjusted-upward or downward-according to a patient's level of asthma control over time. Strategies for stepping up controller therapy are well described, and the adult and pediatric Asthma Yardsticks provide operational recommendations based on patient profiles. Strategies for stepping down controller treatment are less clear, although stepping down to the minimum effective therapy is important and should be considered when a patient's asthma has been well controlled for an adequate period as defined by risk and impairment. This Yardstick presents recommendations for when and how to step down asthma controller therapy according to guideline-defined control levels. The objective is to provide clinicians who treat patients with asthma with a practical and clinically relevant framework for implementing a step-down in controller therapy.

Racial Disparities in Asthma-Related Health Outcomes in Children with Severe/Difficult-to-Treat Asthma

BACKGROUND

There are limited data that examine differences in asthma etiology between black and white children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To describe demographic, clinical, and asthma-related outcomes in black and white children and examine whether differences in outcomes are explained by confounding factors in sequential multivariable models.

METHODS

Black (n = 86) and white (n = 262) children aged 6-11 years from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens 3-year observational study were analyzed. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were described for both cohorts, and outcomes at month 12 were analyzed using statistical models, sequentially adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Black children were more likely to be male (79.1% vs 66.4%; P < .05), obese (12.8% vs 1.5%; P < .001), and from a lower income stratum (USD43,400 vs 55,770; P < .001) than white children. Black children had higher geometric mean IgE levels (434.8 vs 136.8 IU/mL; P < .001), were more likely to have very poorly controlled asthma (72.1% vs 53.4%), use long-term systemic corticosteroids (30.2% vs 9.2%; P < .001), have poorer quality of life (5.5 vs 6.1; P < .001), and have an emergency department visit (27.4% vs 7.7%, P < .001) in the 3 months before month 12. Differences in asthma control and the severity of exacerbations persisted even after accounting for all confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma, asthma burden is greater in black than white children particularly related to several clinical and patient-reported outcome measures that are not explained by differences in background or clinical characteristics.

The pediatric asthma yardstick: Practical recommendations for a sustained step-up in asthma therapy for children with inadequately controlled asthma

Current asthma guidelines recommend a control-based approach to management involving assessment of impairment and risk followed by implementation of treatment strategies individualized according to the patient's needs and preferences. However, for children with asthma, achieving control can be elusive. Although tools are available to help children (and families) track and manage day-to-day symptoms, when and how to implement a longer-term step-up in care is less clear. Furthermore, treatment is challenged by the 3 age groups of childhood-adolescence (12-18 years old), school age (6-11 years old), and young children (≤5 years old)-and what works for 1 age group might not be the best approach for another. The Pediatric Asthma Yardstick provides an in-depth assessment of when and how to step-up therapy for the child with not well or poorly controlled asthma. Development of this tool follows others in the Yardstick series, presenting patient profiles and step-up strategies based on current guidance documents, but modified according to newer data and the authors' combined clinical experience. The objective is to provide clinicians who treat children with asthma practical and clinically relevant recommendations for each step-up and each intervention, with the intent of helping practitioners better treat their pediatric patients with asthma, particularly those who do not always respond to recommended therapies.

Benralizumab efficacy by atopy status and serum immunoglobulin E for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe asthma can have eosinophilic inflammation and/or allergen sensitization. Benralizumab is an anti-eosinophilic monoclonal antibody indicated for add-on maintenance treatment of patients with severe asthma aged 12 years and older, and with an eosinophilic phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of benralizumab by atopic status and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentrations.

METHODS

We analyzed pooled results from the SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) phase III studies. Patients 12 to 75 years old with severe, uncontrolled asthma on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β₂-agonists received 30 mg of subcutaneous benralizumab every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (first 3 doses every 4 weeks) or placebo every 4 weeks. The analysis stratified patients who did and did not meet similar omalizumab-qualifying criteria of atopy and serum IgE levels 30 to 700 kU/L. Patients also categorized as having high serum IgE (≥150 kU/L) or low serum IgE (<150 kU/L) and as having atopy or no atopy. Efficacy outcomes were for all patients and by blood eosinophil counts and included annual exacerbation rate ratio and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second change at treatment end vs placebo.

RESULTS

Benralizumab every 8 weeks decreased exacerbations by 46% (95% confidence interval 26-61, P = .0002) and increased forced expiratory volume in 1 second by 0.125 L (95% confidence interval 0.018-0.232, P = .0218) vs placebo for patients with at least 300 eosinophils/μL who met the atopy and IgE criteria. For patients with eosinophilia and high or low IgE, treatment with benralizumab every 8 weeks resulted in 42% and 43% decreases in exacerbation rate (P ≤ .0004) and 0.123- and 0.138-L increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P ≤ .0041) vs placebo, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Benralizumab treatment decreased exacerbations and improved lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma regardless of serum IgE concentrations and atopy status.

Omalizumab in children with uncontrolled allergic asthma: Review of clinical trial and real-world experience

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood. Allergen sensitization and high frequencies of comorbid allergic diseases are characteristic of severe asthma in children. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE mAb, is the first targeted biologic therapeutic approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma (AA) that remains uncontrolled despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus other controller medications. Since its initial licensing for use in adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older, the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of omalizumab have been demonstrated in several published clinical trials in children aged 6 to less than 12 years with moderate-to-severe AA. These studies supported the approval of the pediatric indication (use in children aged ≥6 years) by the European Medicines Agency in 2009 and the US Food and Drug Administration in 2016. After this most recent change in licensing, we review the outcomes from clinical trials in children with persistent AA receiving omalizumab therapy and observational studies from the past 7 years of clinical experience in Europe. Data sources were identified by using PubMed in 2016. Guidelines and management recommendations and materials from the recent US Food and Drug Administration's Pediatric Advisory Committee meeting are also reviewed.

Asthma Exacerbations and Triggers in Children in TENOR: Impact on Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Data examining associations between asthma exacerbations, triggers, and asthma-related quality of life (QOL) in children with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma are unavailable.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate real-world data on relationships between asthma exacerbations, triggers, and QOL in children using data from TENOR (The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma Outcomes and Treatment Regimens), a 3-year observational study of patients with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma, including those aged 6 to 12 years.

METHODS

QOL was examined using the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) and defined exacerbations hierarchically (descending order of severity): hospitalization, emergency department visit, steroid burst, no exacerbation, using the highest value from months 6 and 12. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences in PAQLQ domain scores at month 12 across exacerbation severity, total number of asthma exacerbations, and number of baseline asthma triggers. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to test the association between the number of triggers and exacerbation hierarchy.

RESULTS

Greater severity of asthma exacerbations was associated with significantly (P < .001) lower mean PAQLQ domain scores, indicating poorer QOL. A higher number of asthma exacerbations was associated with significantly (P < .001) lower mean PAQLQ domain scores. PAQLQ scores were significantly lower with higher numbers of baseline triggers. Higher baseline number of asthma triggers was associated with greater severity (P = .05) and number of asthma exacerbations (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher number of asthma triggers at baseline was associated with greater asthma severity and number of asthma exacerbations and lower QOL in children with severe/difficult-to-treat asthma.

More than a decade follow-up in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma: The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) II

BACKGROUND

The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR I) study demonstrated high morbidity in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma despite standard-of-care treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the long-term natural history of disease and outcomes in patients in TENOR I after more than a decade.

METHODS

TENOR I was a multicenter observational study (2001-2004) of 4756 patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. TENOR II was a follow-up study of TENOR I patients using a single cross-sectional visit in 2013/2014. Overall, the sites participating in TENOR II originally enrolled 1230 patients in TENOR I. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed, including very poorly controlled asthma based on National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 341 (27.7%) patients were enrolled in TENOR II and were representative of the TENOR I cohort. The most frequent comorbidities were rhinitis (84.0%), sinusitis (47.8%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (46.3%). Mean percent predicted prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEV₁ were 72.7% (SD, 21.4%) and 78.2% (SD, 20.7%), respectively. A total of 231 (72.9%) of 317 patients had positive test responses to 1 or more allergen-specific IgEs. The mean blood eosinophil count was 200/μL (SD, 144/μL). Eighty-eight (25.8%) patients experienced an asthma exacerbation in the prior 3 months requiring hospital attention, oral corticosteroids, or both. More than half (197/339 [58.1%]) had very poorly controlled asthma. Medication use suggested undertreatment.

CONCLUSION

TENOR II provides longitudinal data to characterize disease progression, heterogeneity, and severity in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Findings show continued morbidity, including a high degree of comorbid conditions, allergic sensitization, exacerbations, and very poorly controlled asthma, including reduced lung function.

Severe Asthma in Children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study is to characterize, diagnose, evaluate, and treat severe childhood asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Understanding the occurrence of the physiologic and clinical presentations of childhood severe asthma, the treatment and response may be predicted by biomarkers, but the patient's response is highly variable. The onset of severe asthma occurs early and is primarily predicted by severity of viral infection and coexistence of the atopic state.

Changing Paradigms in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: The Role of Biologic Therapies

Cytokine antagonists are monoclonal antibodies that offer new treatment options for refractory asthma but will also increase complexity because they are effective only for patients with certain asthma subtypes that remain to be more clearly defined. The clinical and inflammatory heterogeneity within refractory asthma makes it difficult to manage the disease and to determine which, if any, biologic therapy is suitable for a specific patient. The purpose of this article is to provide a data-driven discussion to clarify the use of biologic therapies in patients with refractory asthma. We first discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of refractory asthma. We then interpret current evidence for biomarkers of eosinophilic or type 2-high asthma so that clinicians can determine potential treatments for patients based on knowledge of their effectiveness in specific asthma phenotypes. We then assess clinical data on the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of approved and pipeline biologic therapies. We conclude by discussing the potential of phenotyping or endotyping refractory asthma and how biologic therapies can play a role in treating patients with refractory asthma.

Clinical Tools to Assess Asthma Control in Children

Asthma affects an estimated 7 million children and causes significant health care and disease burden. The most recent iteration of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute asthma guidelines, the Expert Panel Report 3, emphasizes the assessment and monitoring of asthma control in the management of asthma. Asthma control refers to the degree to which the manifestations of asthma are minimized by therapeutic interventions and the goals of therapy are met. Although assessment of asthma severity is used to guide initiation of therapy, monitoring of asthma control helps determine whether therapy should be maintained or adjusted. The nuances of estimation of asthma control include understanding concepts of current impairment and future risk and incorporating their measurement into clinical practice. Impairment is assessed on the basis of frequency and intensity of symptoms, variations in lung function, and limitations of daily activities. "Risk" refers to the likelihood of exacerbations, progressive loss of lung function, or adverse effects from medications. Currently available ambulatory tools to measure asthma control range are subjective measures, such as patient-reported composite asthma control score instruments or objective measures of lung function, airway hyperreactivity, and biomarkers. Because asthma control exhibits short- and long-term variability, health care providers need to be vigilant regarding the fluctuations in the factors that can create discordance between subjective and objective assessment of asthma control. Familiarity with the properties, application, and relative value of these measures will enable health care providers to choose the optimal set of measures that will adhere to national standards of care and ensure delivery of high-quality care customized to their patients.

A randomized multicenter study evaluating Xolair persistence of response after long-term therapy

BACKGROUND

Few data are available to assist clinicians with decisions regarding long-term use of asthma therapies, including omalizumab.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the benefit and persistence of response in subjects continuing or withdrawing from long-term omalizumab treatment.

METHODS

Evaluating the Xolair Persistency Of Response After Long-Term Therapy (XPORT) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study that included subjects with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma receiving long-term omalizumab. Subjects were randomized by using a hierarchical dynamic randomization scheme to continue their same dose of omalizumab or withdraw to placebo and were then followed every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was any protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. The secondary outcome was time to first protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. Exploratory outcomes included changes in Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Control Test scores.

RESULTS

Significantly more subjects in the omalizumab group (67%) had no protocol-defined exacerbation than in the placebo group (47.7%); an absolute difference of 19.3% (95% CI, 5.0%, 33.6%) represents a 40.1% relative difference. Time to first protocol-defined exacerbation analysis revealed a significantly different between-group exacerbation pattern that was consistent with the primary analysis. Subjects continuing omalizumab had significantly better asthma control (mean [SD] change from baseline to week 52: Asthma Control Test score, -1.16 [4.14] vs placebo, -2.88 [5.38], P = .0188; Asthma Control Questionnaire score, 0.22 [0.66] vs placebo, 0.63 [1.13], P = .0039). Discontinuation of omalizumab was associated with an increase in free IgE levels and an increase in basophil expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor. No safety concerns were noted.

CONCLUSION

Continuation of omalizumab after long-term treatment results in continued benefit, as evidenced by improved symptom control and reduced exacerbation risk.

Overlap of atopic, eosinophilic, and TH2-high asthma phenotypes in a general population with current asthma

BACKGROUND

Atopic, eosinophilic, and TH2-high asthma phenotypes may overlap, but the extent is unknown. Understanding the overlap across these phenotypes may be useful in guiding asthma patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the frequency and overlap of atopic, eosinophilic, and TH2-high asthma phenotypes.

METHODS

We analyzed 2005 to 2006 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Patients with asthma were identified based on the participant self-report. Eosinophilic asthma was defined as a blood eosinophil cutoff point of ≥150, 300, or 400/μL. Atopic asthma was defined as having an allergen-specific IgE level of ≥0.35 IU/mL for any of the 9 perennial allergens tested. TH2-high asthma was defined as a total serum IgE of ≥100 IU/mL and a blood eosinophil count of ≥140/μL.

RESULTS

The study included 269 children and 310 adults. Depending on the eosinophil cutoff used, 31% to 78% of children and 21% to 69% of adults with asthma were classified as having eosinophilic asthma. In addition, 63% of children and 61% of adults were classified as having atopic disease and 48% of children and 37% of adults as having TH2-high asthma. At a higher eosinophil cutoff point, a greater proportion of eosinophilic asthma can be classified as atopic or TH2 high, but a lower proportion of atopic or TH2-high asthma can be classified as eosinophilic. Approximately 70% or more of children and adults with asthma were 1 of these 3 phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

A considerable overlap among eosinophilic, atopic, and TH2-high asthma phenotypes exists in a general asthma population.

Assessment of Consistency of Fixed Airflow Obstruction Status during Budesonide/Formoterol Treatment and Its Effects on Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Asthma

BACKGROUND

The consistency of fixed airflow limitation status during treatment in patients with asthma is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the consistency of fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) status during treatment and effects on treatment response.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis from a 12-week study (NCT00652002) assessed patients aged 12 years or more with moderate-to-severe asthma randomized to twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) 320/9 μg, BUD pMDI 320 μg, FM 9 μg via dry-powder inhaler, or placebo. FAO status was assessed postbronchodilator at screening and after study drug administration at weeks 2, 6, and 12 via the forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio < lower limit of normal (LLN) (FAO+) or ≥ LLN (FAO-). Patients with persistent FAO- and FAO+ retained their screening FAO status at all visits. Patients with inconsistent FAO changed categories at least once during the study. Assessments included early withdrawal due to predefined worsening asthma events (PAEs), lung function, and symptoms.

RESULTS

Of 386 patients, 29% had persistent FAO+, 31% inconsistent FAO, and 40% persistent FAO-. PAEs were lowest in the FAO- group overall and with BUD/FM treatment in patients with FAO+ and inconsistent FAO. Baseline demographics and treatment responses of the inconsistent FAO group were most similar to the FAO+ group. The greatest improvements in asthma control days and use of rescue medications were seen with BUD/FM treatment, regardless of FAO status.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one third of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma in this study had inconsistent FAO, and their treatment responses were most similar to patients with FAO+. Regardless of FAO status, patients treated with BUD/FM experienced the most improved treatment responses and fewest withdrawals due to PAEs.

Update on the utility of corticosteroids in acute pediatric respiratory disorders

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids, delivered systemically and by inhalation, are widely used for the treatment of multiple acute respiratory illnesses in children. However, the level of evidence to support the utility of this therapy varies between these different acute respiratory illnesses.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the evidence regarding the utility of corticosteroids in the management of common acute pediatric respiratory conditions and to highlights the controversies regarding their use.

METHODS

Literature search of manuscripts describing the evidence regarding the efficacy of corticosteroids (systemic and inhaled) in the management of: acute asthma exacerbation among school age children, acute episodic wheeze among preschool children, viral croup, and acute viral bronchiolitis.

RESULTS

Current evidence indicates that systemic corticosteroids provide benefits for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in school age children, mainly in the acute care setting. In addition, high dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy administered in the Emergency Department appears to have comparable effect for the prevention of asthma-related hospital admission as systemic corticosteroids in this age group. In contrast, most available studies have not shown benefit for systemic corticosteroids during acute wheezing episodes in preschool children. Systemic corticosteroids decrease symptoms and the rate of hospital admissions in patients with severe croup; however, corticosteroids have no role in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis and their use in this condition should be discouraged.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroids treatment response varies between the acute respiratory illnesses presented in this review. Future research should aim to fill the current gaps-of-knowledge regarding the utility this intervention such as the identification of specific wheezing phenotypes among preschool children which might benefit from systemic corticosteroids as a treatment for acute viral wheeze.

Impact of asthma exacerbations and asthma triggers on asthma-related quality of life in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND

Few data are available that evaluate the relationship among asthma exacerbations, asthma triggers, and asthma-related quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of asthma exacerbations and asthma triggers on QoL.

METHODS

Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma, ages ≥ 13 years (n = 2679) from the TENOR (The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens) 3-year observational study were included. Exacerbations were defined hierarchically in descending order of severity (hospitalization, emergency department [ED] visit, steroid burst, no exacerbation) by using data from months 6 and 12. The total number (frequency) of exacerbations was assessed. Asthma-related QoL was measured at month 12 by using the Mini-Asthma QoL Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ); self-reported asthma triggers were collected at baseline and annually. We used 1-way ANOVA to test for differences in Mini-AQLQ domain scores across asthma exacerbation severity, the total number of asthma exacerbations, and the number of asthma triggers.

RESULTS

A significant decrease (P < .001) in Mini-AQLQ domain scores was seen with increasing severity of asthma exacerbation (no exacerbation, steroid burst, ED visit, and hospitalization); symptom (5.5, 4.8, 4.3, and 4.2), activity (5.8, 5.2, 4.6, and 4.4), emotional (5.6, 5.0, 4.4, and 4.2), exposure (5.0, 4.5, 4.0, and 3.9); and overall (5.5, 4.9, 4.3, and 4.1). Increasing exacerbation frequency and the number of baseline asthma triggers also were associated with significant decreases in Mini-AQLQ domain scores. An increasing number of asthma triggers were associated with an increase in severity and frequency of exacerbations.

CONCLUSION

Avoidance of asthma triggers may reduce exacerbation rates and improve asthma-related QoL in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Interventional studies are warranted to further explore these outcomes.

Fixed airflow obstruction in asthma: a descriptive study of patient profiles and effect on treatment responses

Background

The role of fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) in asthma is unclear. Objective: To assess the relationship between FAO and clinical features of asthma and the effect of FAO on treatment response. Methods: Post hoc descriptive analysis of data stratified by FAO category (screening post-albuterol FEV₁/FVC <lower limit of normal [LLN] [FAO+] or ≥LLN [FAO−]) from two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of budesonide/formoterol or the monocomponents in mild−moderate (study I; aged ≥6 years; NCT00651651; placebo run-in) or moderate−severe (study II; ≥12 years; NCT00652002; budesonide run-in) asthma patients. Results: At baseline, FAO+ versus FAO− patients were more likely male and had longer asthma duration and worse pulmonary function. During the treatment period, lung function and asthma control measures with placebo were generally worse in FAO+ versus FAO− patients. Budesonide was effective on most end points in both FAO+ and FAO− patients. In contrast to FAO− patients, FAO+ patients were unresponsive to formoterol monotherapy in both study populations. Consistently greater improvements in most end points (including worsening of asthma as predefined by specific lung function parameters or clinical symptoms) were observed moving from formoterol to budesonide to budesonide/formoterol in both FAO+ and FAO− patients, with generally greater than additive effects on lung function with budesonide/formoterol in FAO+ patients. Conclusions: FAO+ patients tended to be more impaired and at greater risk for an asthma event versus FAO− patients. While FAO+ patients were non-responsive to formoterol monotherapy, they retained responsiveness to budesonide and had the greatest lung function and control responses to budesonide/formoterol that were similar to or greater than responses of FAO− patients.