Dual target PARP1/EZH2 inhibitors inducing excessive autophagy and producing synthetic lethality for triple-negative breast cancer therapy

Currently available PARP inhibitors are mainly used for the treatment of BRCA-mutated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with a narrow application range of approximately 15% of patients. Recent studies have shown that EZH2 inhibitors have an obvious effect on breast cancer xenograft models and can promote the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. Here, a series of new dual-target PARP1/EZH2 inhibitors for wild-BRCA type TNBC were designed and synthesized. SAR studies helped us identify compound 12e, encoded KWLX-12e, with good inhibitory activity against PARP1 (IC50 = 6.89 nM) and EZH2 (IC50 = 27.34 nM). Meanwhile, KWLX-12e showed an optimal cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-231 cells (IC50 = 2.84 μM) and BT-549 cells (IC50 = 0.91 μM), with no toxicity on normal breast cell lines. KWLX-12e also exhibited good antitumor activity with the TGI value of 75.94%, more effective than Niraparib plus GSK126 (TGI = 57.24%). Mechanistic studies showed that KWLX-12e achieved synthetic lethality indirectly by inhibiting EZH2 to increase the sensitivity to PARP1, and induced cell death by regulating excessive autophagy. KWLX-12e is expected to be a potential candidate for the treatment of TNBC.

PARP Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: a Short Communication

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been approved in the treatment of several cancers, such as breast and ovarian cancer. This article aims to discuss the current uses, limitations, and future directions for PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in the treatment of breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Following the results of the OlympiAD and EMBRACA trials, PARPis were approved in HER2-negative breast cancer with a germline BRCA mutation. We reviewed this class of drugs' mechanism of action, efficacy, and limitations, as well as further studies that discussed resistance, impaired homologous recombination repair (HRR), and the combination of PARPis with other drugs. Improving understanding of HRR, increasing the ability to target resistance, and combining PARPis with other novel agents are continuing to increase the clinical utility of PARPis.

PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer

Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) were first approved for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), where as a maintenance therapy they transformed clinical management of this disease in both patients with and without homologous recombination deficiency. In this review, we provide a historical overview of PARPi use in EOC and discuss recent updates on overall survival data, highlighting their impact on regulatory approvals. We explore their potential as combination regimens with antiangiogenic and cell-cycle checkpoint inhibitors, as well as other small molecule inhibitors, to overcome resistance mechanisms and enhance therapeutic efficacy, providing a future perspective on the use of PARPis in EOC treatment.

Osteoclast Cancer Cell Metabolic Cross-talk Confers PARP Inhibitor Resistance in Bone Metastatic Breast Cancer

The majority of patients with late-stage breast cancer develop distal bone metastases. The bone microenvironment can affect response to therapy, and uncovering the underlying mechanisms could help identify improved strategies for treating bone metastatic breast cancer. Here, we observed that osteoclasts reduced the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to DNA damaging agents, including cisplatin and the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib. Metabolic profiling identified elevated glutamine production by osteoclasts. Glutamine supplementation enhanced the survival of breast cancer cells treated with DNA damaging agents, while blocking glutamine uptake increased sensitivity and suppressed bone metastasis. GPX4, the critical enzyme responsible for glutathione oxidation, was upregulated in cancer cells following PARPi treatment through stress-induced ATF4-dependent transcriptional programming. Increased glutamine uptake and GPX4 upregulation concertedly enhanced glutathione metabolism in cancer cells to help neutralize oxidative stress and generate PARPi resistance. Analysis of paired patient samples of primary breast tumors and bone metastases revealed significant induction of GPX4 in bone metastases. Combination therapy utilizing PARPi and zoledronate, which blocks osteoclast activity and thereby reduces the microenvironmental glutamine supply, generated a synergistic effect in reducing bone metastasis. These results identify a role for glutamine production by bone-resident cells in supporting metastatic cancer cells to overcome oxidative stress and develop resistance to DNA-damaging therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE

Metabolic interaction between osteoclasts and tumor cells contributes to resistance to DNA-damaging agents, which can be blocked by combination treatment with PARP and osteoclast inhibitors to reduce bone metastatic burden.

Maintenance therapy for newly and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: current therapies and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth cause of cancer death among women, and 70-80% of patients relapse within 2 years from the last cycle of first-line chemotherapy despite a complete response to chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery. In this context, the goal of the maintenance treatment strategy is to prolong the time to recurrence. The recent development of targeted molecular therapies resulted in a broader spectrum of maintenance therapeutic options with consequent higher clinical benefit but less toxicity. This review summarizes the currently available maintenance strategies for newly and recurrent EOC, focusing on the decision-making process to personalize treatment and future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past 10 years, several studies have demonstrated the clear benefit in terms of survival with the addition of a maintenance treatment strategy over the 'watchful waiting' approach both in the first line and recurrent setting. Since December 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have approved four drugs for ovarian cancer maintenance based on the results of several clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and tolerability. These include the antiangiogenic drug Bevacizumab and three polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors: olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib.

SUMMARY

These data led American and European Treatment guidelines to include bevacizumab, olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and combination bevacizumab-olaparib as maintenance treatment options in first-line and recurrent ovarian cancer therapy. However, with the availability of different maintenance options, identifying the best treatment choice for each patient can be challenging, and several clinical and molecular aspects have to be taken into account in the decision-making process.

Combining Homologous Recombination-Deficient Testing and Functional RAD51 Analysis Enhances the Prediction of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Sensitivity

PURPOSE

To meet the urgent need for accessible homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) test options, we validated a laboratory-developed test (LDT) and a functional RAD51 assay to assess patients with ovarian cancer and predict the clinical benefit of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

Optimization of the LDT cutoff and validation on the basis of samples from 91 patients enrolled in the ENGOT-ov24/NSGO-AVANOVA1&2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02354131), previously subjected to commercial CDx HRD testing (CDx). RAD51 foci analysis was performed and tumors with ≥five foci/nucleus were classified as RAD51-positive (homologous recombination-proficient).

RESULTS

The optimal LDT cutoff is 54. Comparing CDx genome instability score and LDT HRD scores show a Spearman's correlation of rho = 0.764 (P < .0001). Cross-tabulation analysis shows that the sensitivity of the LDT HRD score is 86% and of the LDT HRD status is 91.8% (Fisher's exact test P < .001). Survival analysis on progression-free survival (PFS) of LDT-assessed patients show a Cox regression P < .05. RAD51 assays show a correlation between low RAD51 foci detection (<20% RAD51+ cells) and significantly prolonged PFS (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The robust concordance between the open standard LDT and the CDx, especially the correlation with PFS, warrants future validation and implementation of the open standard LDT for HRD testing in diagnostic settings.

PARP inhibitors for prostate cancer

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in DNA damage response genes. This has also led to widespread use of genomic testing in all patients with mCRPC. The current review will give an overview of (1) the current understanding of the interplay between DNA damage response and PARP enzymes; (2) the clinical landscape of PARP inhibitors, including the combination of PARP inhibitors with other agents such as androgen-receptor signaling agents; (3) biomarkers related to PARP inhibitor response and resistance; and (4) considerations for interpreting genomic testing results and treating patients with PARP inhibitors.

Beyond BRCA: Diagnosis and management of homologous recombination repair deficient pancreatic cancer

Approximately 4%-7% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are found to harbor deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2. Loss of function of BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 results in deficiency in homologous recombination repair (HRR), a critical DNA repair pathway, and confers sensitivity to certain DNA damaging agents, including platinum chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. The PARP inhibitor olaparib is food and drug administration (FDA) approved for use in pancreatic cancer based on the POLO trial, which found that maintenance olaparib significantly prolonged progression free survival compared to placebo among patients with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and metastatic PDAC that had not progressed following frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, there has been considerable interest in identifying patients without BRCA inactivation whose tumors also exhibit properties of HRR deficiency and thus may be susceptible to therapies with proven benefit in cancers harboring BRCA mutations. Here, we discuss methods for identification of HRR-deficiency and review the management of HRR-deficient cancers with a focus on HRR-deficient PDAC.

PARP inhibitors: A review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacogenetics

PARP inhibitors have emerged as a promising class of anticancer agents approved for the treatment of ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. These inhibitors target PARP enzymes involved in DNA repair pathways and exhibit remarkable efficacy in cancers with genetic deficiencies in the homologous recombination pathway responsible for mending DNA double-strand breaks. While all PARP inhibitors demonstrate potent and selective inhibition of PARP1 and PARP2, the key enzymes involved in DNA repair, each agent within the class possesses unique pharmacological profiles distinguishing them from one another. This review aims to comprehensively examine the properties of the entire PARP inhibitor class while emphasizing individual pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic distinctions that inform clinical recommendations. Currently, four agents, namely olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib, have obtained approval in the United States and Europe. Olaparib, the first approved PARP inhibitor, has been extensively studied and is indicated for a wider range of cancer types. Niraparib and talazoparib, the more recent additions to the PARP inhibitor class, possess the longest half-lives and are formulated for convenient once-daily dosing, alleviating the pill burden for patients when compared to older agents. Moreover, talazoparib undergoes minimal hepatic metabolism, reducing the potential for drug-drug interactions. Notably, niraparib is the sole PARP inhibitor recommended for dose reduction in hepatically impaired populations, whereas talazoparib and olaparib should be dose reduced in renally impaired populations. The mechanisms underlying these dose adjustment recommendations are further explored in this review. Additionally, this review briefly covers veliparib, a PARP inhibitor under development, and two recently approved PARP inhibitors in China, fuzuloparib and pamiparib. Although significant progress has been made in understanding PARP inhibitors, there are several unanswered questions that remain, necessitating further research across a broader spectrum of cancer types within this evolving class of anticancer agents.

PARP1 roles in DNA repair and DNA replication: The basi(c)s of PARP inhibitor efficacy and resistance

Genome integrity is under constant insult from endogenous and exogenous sources. In order to cope, eukaryotic cells have evolved an elaborate network of DNA repair that can deal with diverse lesion types and exhibits considerable functional redundancy. PARP1 is a major sensor of DNA breaks with established and putative roles in a number of pathways within the DNA repair network, including repair of single- and double-strand breaks as well as protection of the DNA replication fork. Importantly, PARP1 is the major target of small-molecule PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which are employed in the treatment of homologous recombination (HR)-deficient tumors, as the latter are particularly susceptible to the accumulation of DNA damage due to an inability to efficiently repair highly toxic double-strand DNA breaks. The clinical success of PARPi has fostered extensive research into PARP biology, which has shed light on the involvement of PARP1 in various genomic transactions. A major goal within the field has been to understand the relationship between catalytic inhibition and PARP1 trapping. The specific consequences of inhibition and trapping on genomic stability as a basis for the cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitors remain a matter of debate. Finally, PARP inhibition is increasingly recognized for its capacity to elicit/modulate anti-tumor immunity. The clinical potential of PARP inhibition is, however, hindered by the development of resistance. Hence, extensive efforts are invested in identifying factors that promote resistance or sensitize cells to PARPi. The current review provides a summary of advances in our understanding of PARP1 biology, the mechanistic nature, and molecular consequences of PARP inhibition, as well as the mechanisms that give rise to PARPi resistance.

BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in a pan-cancer cohort

Tumor sensitivity to platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy and poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors is increased by homologous recombination deficiency-causing mutations; in particular, reversion mutations cause drug resistance by restoring protein function. Treatment response is predicted by breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutations; however, BRCA1/2 reversion mutations have not been comprehensively studied in pan-cancer cohorts. We aimed to characterize BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in a large pan-cancer cohort of Japanese patients by retrospectively analyzing sequencing data for BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations in 3738 patients with 32 cancer types. We identified somatic mutations in tumors or circulating cell-free DNA that could restore the ORF of adverse alleles, including reversion mutations. We identified 12 (0.32%) patients with somatic BRCA1 (n = 3) and BRCA2 (n = 9) reversion mutations in breast (n = 4), ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal (n = 4), pancreatic (n = 2), prostate (n = 1), and gallbladder (n = 1) cancers. We identified 21 reversion events-BRCA1 (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 18)-including eight pure deletions, one single-nucleotide variant, six multinucleotide variants, and six deletion-insertions. Seven (33.3%) reversion deletions showed a microhomology length greater than 1 bp, suggesting microhomology-mediated end-join repair. Disease course data were obtained for all patients with reversion events: four patients acquired mutations after PARP-inhibitor treatment failure, two showed somatic reversion mutations after disease progression, following Pt-based treatment, five showed mutations after both treatments, one patient with pancreatic cancer and BRCA1 reversion mutations had no history of either treatment. Although reversion mutations commonly occur in BRCA-associated cancers, our findings suggest that reversion mutations due to Pt-chemotherapy might be correlated with BRCA1/2-mediated tumorigenesis even in non-BRCA-associated histologies.

Germline and somatic testing for ovarian Cancer: An SGO clinical practice statement

Germline and somatic genetic testing have become critical components of care for people with ovarian cancer. The identification of germline and somatic pathogenic variants as well as homologous recombination deficiency can contribute to the prediction of treatment response, prognostic outcome, and suitability for targeted agents (e.g. poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors). Furthermore, identifying germline pathogenic variants can prompt cascade genetic testing for at-risk relatives. Despite the clinical benefits and consensus recommendations from several organizations calling for universal genetic testing in ovarian cancer, only about one third of patients complete germline or somatic genetic testing. The members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee have composed this statement to provide an overview of germline and somatic genetic testing for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, focusing on available testing modalities and options for care delivery.

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 inhibition promotes the effect of plantamajoside in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and, more than half of these cases are diagnosed in China. However, effective treatment for HCC is still limited.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) was first activated and inhibited in HepG2 cells using a pharmacological method. HepG2 cell proliferation was detected using the CCK-8 method. Metastasis and apoptosis of HepG2 cells were detected using wound healing and flow cytometry. The expression of each target molecule related to metastasis and invasion, such as MMPs, E-cadherin and the PI3K/AKT/Mcl-1/PARP signaling pathway was detected by western blotting. The secretion of molecular metastases was detected using competitive ELISA.

RESULTS

This study constructed a CXCR4 activation and inhibition model in HepG2 cells. CXCR4 inhibition promoted the inhibitory effect of plantamajoside on the proliferation and metastasis of cells, which led to apoptosis. Furthermore, we found that the expression of apoptosis-related proteins was increased after treatment with plantamajoside combined with CXCR4 inhibition. In addition, the expression and secretion of pro-metastatic proteins, including MMPs and E-cadherin were decreased. We also noticed that this effect might be mediated by the PI3K/AKT/Mcl-1/PARP signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

CXCR4 inhibition may contribute to the treatment of HCC. Inhibition of CXCR4 expression contributes to the therapeutic effect of plantamajoside; the effect of plantamajoside might be mediated by the PI3K/AKT/Mcl-1/PARP signaling pathway; and CXCR4 might be a therapeutic target of HCC.

Evaluation of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is an important biomarker guiding selection of ovarian cancer patients who will derive the most benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). HRD prevents cells from repairing double-stranded DNA damage with high fidelity, PARPis limit single-stranded repair, and together these deficits induce synthetic lethality. Germline or somatic BRCA mutations represent the narrowest definition of HRD, but do not reflect all patients who will have a durable PARPi response. HRD can also be defined by its downstream consequences, which are measured by different metrics depending on the test used. Ideally, all patients will undergo genetic counseling and germline testing shortly after diagnosis and have somatic testing sent once an adequate tumor sample is available. Should barriers to one test be higher, pursuing germline testing with reflex to somatic testing for BRCA wildtype patients or somatic testing first strategies are both evidence-based. Ultimately both tests offer complementary information, germline testing should be pursued for any patient with a history of ovarian cancer, and somatic testing is valuable at recurrence if not performed in the upfront setting. There is a paucity of data to suggest superiority of one germline or somatic assay; therefore, selection should optimize turnaround time, cost to patients, preferred result format, and logistical burden. Each clinic should implement a standard testing strategy for all ovarian cancer patients that ensures HRD status is known at the time of upfront chemotherapy completion to facilitate comprehensive counseling about anticipated maintenance PARPi benefit.

Durvalumab Plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Followed by Maintenance Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: The Phase III DUO-E Trial

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy and chemotherapy combinations have shown activity in endometrial cancer, with greater benefit in mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (dMMR) than MMR-proficient (pMMR) disease. Adding a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor may improve outcomes, especially in pMMR disease.

METHODS

This phase III, global, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomly assigned eligible patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer 1:1:1 to: carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab placebo followed by placebo maintenance (control arm); carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab plus olaparib placebo (durvalumab arm); or carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab plus olaparib (durvalumab + olaparib arm). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) in the durvalumab arm versus control and the durvalumab + olaparib arm versus control.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighteen patients were randomly assigned. In the intention-to-treat population, statistically significant PFS benefit was observed in the durvalumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.89]; P = .003) and durvalumab + olaparib arms (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.69]; P < .0001) versus control. Prespecified, exploratory subgroup analyses showed PFS benefit in dMMR (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.80]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.75]) and pMMR subgroups (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.97]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control] 0.57; [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.73]); and in PD-L1-positive subgroups (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.83]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.57]). Interim overall survival results (maturity approximately 28%) were supportive of the primary outcomes (durvalumab v control: HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.07]; P = .120; durvalumab + olaparib v control: HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.83]; P = .003). The safety profiles of the experimental arms were generally consistent with individual agents.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

No-ozone cold plasma induces apoptosis in human neuroblastoma cell line via increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of argon-based No-ozone Cold Plasma (NCP) on neuroblastoma cancer cell apoptosis.

METHODS

Experiments were performed with SK-N-SH and HS 68. Cell cultures were treated with NCP for 1, 3, and 5 min. NCP was applied using three different strategies: direct NCP application to cell cultures, to only media, and to only cells. Evaluation of cell viability and the level of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) was performed. N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) was also used to antagonize intracellular ROS. Cleaved caspase 3, PARP, aquaporin (AQP) 3 and 8 were detected.

RESULTS

NCP induced a gradual decrease in the SK-N-SH cell viability. In contrast, the viability of HS 68 cells did not change. SK-N-SH cells viability was reduced the most when the only media-NCP application strategy was employed. Intracellular ROS levels were significantly increased with time. Cleaved caspase 3 and PARP were increased at 6 h after NCP application. SK-N-SH cells remained viable with NAC after NCP application. AQP 3 and 8 were over-expressed in SK-N-SH cells.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate the anti-cancer effect of NCP on neuroblastoma cells. NCP enhanced the selective apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells due to the increased intracellular ROS.

Design and synthesis of the first PARP-1 and proteasome dual inhibitors to treat breast cancer

PARP-1 is a crucial factor in repairing DNA single strand damage and maintaining genomic stability. However, the use of PARP-1 inhibitors is limited to combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or as a single agent for indications carrying HRR defects. The ubiquitin-proteasome system processes the majority of cellular proteins and is the principal manner by which cells regulate protein homeostasis. Proteasome inhibitors can cooperate with PARP-1 inhibitors to inhibit DNA homologous recombination repair function. In this study, we designed and synthesized the first dual PARP-1 and proteasome inhibitor based on Olaparib and Ixazomib. Both compounds 42d and 42i exhibited excellent proliferation inhibition and dual-target synergistic effects on cells that were insensitive to PARP-1 inhibitors. Further mechanistic evaluations revealed that 42d and 42i could inhibit homologous recombination repair function by down-regulating the expression of BRCA1 and RAD51. Additionally, 42i induced more significant apoptosis and showed better inhibitory effect on cell proliferation in clonal formation experiments in breast cancer cells than 42d. In summary, our study presented a new class of dual PARP-1/proteasome inhibitors with significant synergistic effects for the treatment of breast cancer.

Development and validation of a sensitive LC-MS/MS method for the assay of four PARP inhibitors in human plasma and its application in ovarian cancer patients

PARP inhibitors have demonstrated marked efficacy in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 loss-of-function mutations. In this study, we established and validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based method to simultaneously quantify the four frequently prescripted PARP inhibitors, namely niraparib, olaparib，fluzoparib, and pamiparib, in ovarian cancer. The mobile phase was 50 % methanol with 0.1 % formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min, within 8 min run time. Four PARP inhibitors were separated on a Hypersil GOLD™ aQ C18 Polar Endcapped LC column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 µm) at 35 ℃ and subjected to mass analysis using positive electro-spray ionization (ESI). The linear range of this method was 10-2000 ng/mL, 25-5000 ng/mL, and 50-10,000 ng/mL for niraparib, olaparib and fluzoparib, and pamiparib, respectively, with the correlation coefficients (r2) ≥ 0.99. Accuracies ranged from 93.12 %-110.71 and the inter- and intra-batch precisions were less than 15 % for all analytes in quality control samples. There was no significant matrix effect. Twenty-eight plasma samples were obtained from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The mean plasma concentrations (±SD) of niraparib and olaparib were 424.76 (±228.35) ng/mL and 1760.47 (±1739.69) ng/mL, respectively. The validated LC-MS/MS method allows the convient and efficient determination of four PARP inhibitors' exposure levels in ovarian cancer patients.

Guanosine diphosphate-mannose suppresses homologous recombination repair and potentiates antitumor immunity in triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis. TNBCs with high homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores benefit from DNA-damaging agents, including platinum drugs and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, whereas those with low HRD scores still lack therapeutic options. Therefore, we sought to exploit metabolic alterations to induce HRD and sensitize DNA-damaging agents in TNBCs with low HRD scores. We systematically analyzed TNBC metabolomics and identified a metabolite, guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-mannose (GDP-M), that impeded homologous recombination repair (HRR). Mechanistically, the low expression of the upstream enzyme GDP-mannose-pyrophosphorylase-A (GMPPA) led to the endogenous up-regulation of GDP-M in TNBC. The accumulation of GDP-M in tumor cells further reduced the interaction between breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2) and ubiquitin-specific peptidase 21 (USP21), which promoted the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of BRCA2 to inhibit HRR. Therapeutically, we illustrated that the supplementation of GDP-M sensitized DNA-damaging agents to impair tumor growth in both in vitro (cancer cell line and patient-derived organoid) and in vivo (xenograft in immunodeficient mouse) models. Moreover, the combination of GDP-M with DNA-damaging agents activated STING-dependent antitumor immunity in immunocompetent syngeneic mouse models. Therefore, GDP-M supplementation combined with PARP inhibition augmented the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibodies. Together, these findings suggest that GDP-M is a crucial HRD-related metabolite and propose a promising therapeutic strategy for TNBCs with low HRD scores using the combination of GDP-M, PARP inhibitors, and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

Biology-driven therapy advances in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Following a period of slow progress, the completion of genome sequencing and the paradigm shift relative to the cell of origin for high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) led to a new perspective on the biology and therapeutic solutions for this deadly cancer. Experimental models were revisited to address old questions, and improved tools were generated. Additional pathways emerging as drivers of ovarian tumorigenesis and key dependencies for therapeutic targeting, in particular, VEGF-driven angiogenesis and homologous recombination deficiency, were discovered. Molecular profiling of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer defined distinct genetic events for each entity, enabling the first attempts toward personalized treatment. Armed with this knowledge, HGSOC treatment was revised to include new agents. Among them, PARP inhibitors (PARPis) were shown to induce unprecedented improvement in clinical benefit for selected subsets of patients. Research on mechanisms of resistance to PARPis is beginning to discover vulnerabilities and point to new treatment possibilities. This Review highlights these advances, the remaining challenges, and unsolved problems in the field.

Effects of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor treatment on the repair process of ischemic acute kidney injury

Excessive activation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) contributes to ischemic acute kidney injury (AKI). PARP inhibition has been shown to be beneficial in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in the early phase, but its role in the repair process remains unclear. The effects of JPI-289, a novel PARP inhibitor, during the healing phase after renal IRI were investigated. IRI was performed on 9-week-old male C57BL/6 mice. Saline or JPI-289 100 mg/kg was intraperitoneally administered once at 24 h or additionally at 48 h after IRI. Hypoxic HK-2 cells were treated with JPI-289. Renal function and fibrosis extent were comparable between groups. JPI-289 treatment caused more prominent tubular atrophy and proinflammatory intrarenal leukocyte phenotypes and cytokines/chemokines changes at 12 weeks after unilateral IRI. JPI-289 treatment enhanced gene expressions associated with collagen formation, toll-like receptors, and the immune system in proximal tubules and endothelial cells after IRI. JPI-289 treatment at 3 or 6 h after hypoxia facilitated proliferation of hypoxic HK-2 cells, whereas further treatment after 24 h suppressed proliferation. Delayed inhibition of PARP after renal IRI did not facilitate the repair process during the early healing phase but rather may aggravate renal tubular atrophy during the late healing phase in ischemic AKI.

Adherence of PARP inhibitor for frontline maintenance therapy in primary epithelial ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVE

To identify the adherence rate to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and identify factors contributing to the deterioration of adherence at our institution.

METHODS

The adherence rate to PARP inhibitors was calculated using self-reported Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale questionnaires from a cross-sectional survey. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors that affected adherence.

RESULTS

Of the 131 respondents, 32 (24.4%) showed non-adherence to PARP inhibitors. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, unemployed or retired status (odds ratio [OR]=4.878; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.528-15.572; p=0.008), patients receiving niraparib (OR=3.387; 95% CI=1.283-8.940; p=0.014), and a lower score on the quality-of-life assessment (EORTC-QLQ-OV28), which reflects a better quality of life (QOC) with a lower symptom burden (OR=1.056; 95% CI=1.027-1.086; p<0.001) were associated with high adherence to PARP inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-fourth of patients with ovarian cancer are non-adherent to PARP inhibitors as maintenance treatment for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. The occupational status, type of PARP inhibitor, and QOC may affect adherence to PARP inhibitors.

Are PARP Inhibitors Ready for Prime Time in Metastatic Prostate Cancer? Maybe Not

While PARP inhibitors such as rucaparib and olaparib have shown activity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, they have failed to show a clear improvement in hard outcomes such as overall survival or quality of life. Because of methodological limitations, we suggest caution before implementing these treatments in routine clinical practice; offering them to patients without a BRCA1/2 mutation is probably inappropriate.

Harnessing the effects of hypoxia-like inhibition on homology-directed DNA repair

Hypoxia is a hallmark feature of the tumor microenvironment which can promote mutagenesis and instability. This increase in mutational burden occurs as a result of the downregulation of DNA repair systems. Deficits in the DNA damage response can be exploited to induce cytotoxicity and treat advanced stage cancers. With the advent of precision medicine, agents such as Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been used to achieve synthetic lethality in homology directed repair (HDR) deficient cancers. However, most cancers lack these predictive biomarkers. Treatment for the HDR proficient population represents an important unmet clinical need. There has been interest in the use of anti-angiogenic agents to promote tumor hypoxia and induce deficiency in a HDR proficient background. For example, the use of cediranib to inhibit PDGFR and downregulate enzymes of the HDR pathway can be used synergistically with a PARP inhibitor. This combination can improve therapeutic responses in HDR proficient cancers. Preclinical results and Phase II and III clinical trial data support the mechanistic rationale for the efficacy of these agents in combination. Future investigations should explore the effectiveness of cediranib and other anti-angiogenic agents with a PARP inhibitor to elicit an antitumor response and sensitize cancers to immunotherapy.

Platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer: what possibilities?

Metastatic prostate cancer is a major health burden worldwide, necessitating the continuous development of effective treatment strategies. Androgen deprivation therapy remains the cornerstone of prostate cancer treatment, but novel approaches are needed for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Recent studies have highlighted the prevalence of mutations in DNA repair genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, in mCRPC patients, rendering them more susceptible to platinum-based chemotherapy and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Platinum-based chemotherapy, particularly in combination with taxanes, has demonstrated encouraging activity in mCRPC, as well as homologous recombination gene alterations have shown increased sensitivity to platinum compounds in these patients. The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with PARP inhibitors represents a novel and potentially effective therapeutic strategy for this subgroup of patients. However, the optimal sequence of administering these agents and the potential for cross-resistance and cross-toxicities remain areas requiring further investigation. Prospective randomized studies are essential to elucidate the most effective treatment approach for this challenging patient population. This review aims to explore the potential of platinum-based chemotherapy in the context of prostate cancer, and more in detail in homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutated patients. We discuss the synergistic effects of combining platinum compounds with PARP inhibitors and the potential benefits of adopting specific therapeutic sequences.

EZH2-regulated PARP-1 Expression is a Likely Mechanism for the Chemoresistance of Gliomas to Temozolomide

BACKGROUND

Chemoresistance in gliomas accounts for the major cause of tumor progress and recurrence during comprehensive treatment with alkylating agents including temozolomide (TMZ). The oncogenic role of Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) has been identified in many solid malignancies including gliomas, though the accurate effect of EZH2 on chemotherapy resistance of gliomas has been elusive.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the role of EHZ2 on TMZ resistance of gliomas and the molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q) PCR, and western blot assay were performed for expressional analysis. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was applied to determine the TMZ sensitivity. EZH2-silencing lentivirus was generated for mechanic study.

RESULTS

EZH2 was overexpressed in gliomas both at the transcriptional and protein levels. EZH2 level in glioma cell lines was positively correlated with resistance to TMZ, represented by the 50% inhibition rate (IC50). Moreover, there was increased TMZ sensitivity in EZH2-inhibited glioma cells than in the control cells. Furthermore, we determined that PARP1 was a common molecule among the downregulated DNA repair proteins in both U251 and U87 glioma cell lines after EZH2 inhibition. Specifically, we observed a spontaneous increase of PARP1 expression with TMZ treatment and interestingly, the increase of PARP1 could be also reduced by EZH2 inhibition in the glioma cells. Finally, combined treatment with lentivirus-induced EZH2 inhibition and a PARP1 inhibitor dramatically enhanced TMZ cytotoxicity compared with either one alone.

CONCLUSION

EZH2-PARP-1 signaling axis is possibly responsible for the chemoresistance of gliomas to TMZ. Simultaneously inhibiting these two genes may improve the outcome of TMZ chemotherapy.

Targeting DDX11 promotes PARP inhibitor sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma by attenuating BRCA2-RAD51 mediated homologous recombination

Homologous recombination (HR) is a major DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway of clinical interest because of treatment with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Cooperation between RAD51 and BRCA2 is pivotal for DNA DSB repair, and its dysfunction induces HR deficiency and sensitizes cancer cells to PARPi. The depletion of the DEAD-box protein DDX11 was found to suppress HR in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. The HR ability of HCC cells is not always dependent on the DDX11 level because of natural DDX11 mutations. In Huh7 cells, natural DDX11 mutations were detected, increasing the susceptibility of Huh7 cells to olaparib in vitro and in vivo. The HR deficiency of Huh7 cells was restored when CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in genomic editing was used to revert the DDX11 Q238H mutation to wild type. The DDX11 Q238H mutation impeded the phosphorylation of DDX11 by ATM at serine 237, preventing the recruitment of RAD51 to damaged DNA sites by disrupting the interaction between RAD51 and BRCA2. Clinically, a high level of DDX11 correlated with advanced clinical characteristics and a poor prognosis and served as an independent risk factor for overall and disease-free survival in patients with HCC. We propose that HCC with a high level of wild-type DDX11 tends to be more resistant to PARPi because of enhanced recombination repair, and the key mutation of DDX11 (Q238H) is potentially exploitable.

The impact of PARP inhibitors in the whole scenario of ovarian cancer management: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin is still the cornerstone of the first-line treatment in advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (aEOC) management and the clinical response to platinum-derived agents remains the major predictor of long-term outcomes.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We aimed to identify the best treatment of the aEOC in terms of efficacy and safety, considering all treatment phases. A systematic literature search has been done to compare all treatments in aEOC population. Randomized trials with available survival and safety data published in the 2011-2022 timeframe were enclosed. Only trials reporting the BRCA or HRD (Homologous Recombination Deficiency) status were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A ranking of treatment schedules on the progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint was performed. The random-effect model was used to elaborate and extract data. The Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) by Bayesian model was performed by STATA v17. Data on PFS were extracted in terms of Hazard ratio with relative confidence intervals.

RESULTS

This NMA involved 18 trials for a total of 9105 patients. Within 12 treatment groups, we performed 3 different sensitivity analyses including "all comers" Intention to Treat (ITT) population, BRCA-mutated (BRCAm), and HRD subgroups, respectively. Considering the SUCRA-reported cumulative PFS probabilities, we showed that in the ITT population, the inferred best treatment was niraparib plus bevacizumab with a SUCRA of 96.7. In the BRCAm subgroup, the best SUCRA was for olaparib plus chemotherapy (96,9). The HRD population showed an inferred best treatment for niraparib plus bevacizumab (SUCRA 98,4). Moreover, we reported a cumulative summary of PARPi toxicity, in which different 3-4 grade toxicity profiles were observed, despite the PARPi "class effect" in terms of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all aEOC subgroups, the best therapeutical option was identified as PARPi plus chemotherapy and/or antiangiogenetic agents, suggesting the relevance of combinatory approaches based on molecular profile. This work underlines the potential value of "chemo-free" regimens to prolong the platinum-free interval (PFI).

Targeting the DNA repair pathway for breast cancer therapy: Beyond the molecular subtypes

DNA repair is a vital mechanism in cells that protects against DNA damage caused by internal and external factors. It involves a network of signaling pathways that monitor and transmit damage signals, activating various cellular activities to repair DNA damage and maintain genomic integrity. Dysfunctions in this repair pathway are strongly associated with the development and progression of cancer. However, they also present an opportunity for targeted therapy in breast cancer. Extensive research has focused on developing inhibitors that play a crucial role in the signaling pathway of DNA repair, particularly due to the remarkable success of PARP1 inhibitors (PARPis) in treating breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. In this review, we summarize the current research progress and clinical implementation of BRCA and BRCAness in targeted treatments for the DNA repair pathway. Additionally, we present advancements in diverse inhibitors of DNA repair, both as individual and combined approaches, for treating breast cancer. We also discuss the clinical application of DNA repair-targeted therapy for breast cancer, including the rationale, indications, and summarized clinical data for patients with different breast cancer subtypes. We assess their influence on cancer progression, survival rates, and major adverse reactions. Last, we anticipate forthcoming advancements in targeted therapy for cancer treatment and emphasize prospective areas of development.

A novel dopamine receptor D2 antagonist (ONC206) potentiates the effects of olaparib in endometrial cancer

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective therapies for cancer patients with homologous recombination (HR) deficient tumors. The imipridone ONC206 is an orally bioavailable dopamine receptor D2 antagonist and mitochondrial protease ClpP agonist that has anti-tumorigenic effects in endometrial cancer via induction of apoptosis, activation of the integrated stress response and modulation of PI3K/AKT signaling. Both PARP inhibitors and imipridones are being evaluated in endometrial cancer clinical trials but have yet to be explored in combination. In this manuscript, we evaluated the effects of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with ONC206 in human endometrioid endometrial cancer cell lines and in a genetically engineered mouse model of endometrial cancer. Our results showed that simultaneous exposure of endometrial cancer cells to olaparib and ONC206 resulted in synergistic anti-proliferative effects and increased cellular stress and apoptosis in both cell lines, compared to either drug alone. The combination treatment also decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and reduced phosphorylation of AKT and S6, with greater effects compared to either drug alone. In the transgenic model of endometrial cancer, the combination of olaparib and ONC206 resulted in a more significant reduction in tumor weight in obese and lean mice compared to ONC206 alone or olaparib alone, together with a considerably decreased Ki-67 and enhanced H2AX expression in obese and lean mice. These results suggest that this novel dual therapy may be worthy of further exploration in clinical trials.

Advances in Development of Selective Antitumor Inhibitors That Target PARP-1

Cancer is a major threat to the lives and health of people around the world, and the development of effective antitumor drugs that exhibit fewer toxic effects is an important aspect of cancer treatment. PARP inhibitors are antitumor drugs that target pathways involved in DNA-damage repair. The currently approved PARP inhibitors include olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, talazoparib, fuzuloparib, and pamiparib. Hematological toxicities associated with the simultaneous inhibition of PARP-1 and PARP-2 have limited the clinical applications of these drugs. The present review introduces the necessity for research on the development of selective PARP-1 inhibitors from the perspective of structural and functional mechanisms of PARP-1 inhibition. A review of recently reported selective PARP-1 inhibitors provides the foundation for exploring novel strategies for designing selective PARP-1 inhibitors from the perspective of structure-activity relationships combined with computer simulations.

PRMT blockade induces defective DNA replication stress response and synergizes with PARP inhibition

Multiple cancers exhibit aberrant protein arginine methylation by both type I arginine methyltransferases, predominately protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) and to a lesser extent PRMT4, and by type II PRMTs, predominately PRMT5. Here, we perform targeted proteomics following inhibition of PRMT1, PRMT4, and PRMT5 across 12 cancer cell lines. We find that inhibition of type I and II PRMTs suppresses phosphorylated and total ATR in cancer cells. Loss of ATR from PRMT inhibition results in defective DNA replication stress response activation, including from PARP inhibitors. Inhibition of type I and II PRMTs is synergistic with PARP inhibition regardless of homologous recombination function, but type I PRMT inhibition is more toxic to non-malignant cells. Finally, we demonstrate that the combination of PARP and PRMT5 inhibition improves survival in both BRCA-mutant and wild-type patient-derived xenografts without toxicity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PRMT5 inhibition may be a well-tolerated approach to sensitize tumors to PARP inhibition.

Targeted inhibition of the ATR/CHK1 pathway overcomes resistance to olaparib and dysregulates DNA damage response protein expression in BRCA2MUT ovarian cancer cells

Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) approved for targeted treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). However, its efficacy is impeded by the inevitable occurrence of resistance. Here, we investigated whether the cytotoxic activity of olaparib could be synergistically enhanced in olaparib-resistant OC cells with BRCA2 reversion mutation by the addition of inhibitors of the ATR/CHK1 pathway. Moreover, we provide insights into alterations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway induced by combination treatments. Antitumor activity of olaparib alone or combined with an ATR inhibitor (ATRi, ceralasertib) or CHK1 inhibitor (CHK1i, MK-8776) was evaluated in OC cell lines sensitive (PEO1, PEO4) and resistant (PEO1-OR) to olaparib. Antibody microarrays were used to explore changes in expression of 27 DDR-related proteins. Olaparib in combination with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors synergistically induced a decrease in viability and clonogenic survival and an increase in apoptosis mediated by caspase-3/7 in all OC cells. Combination treatments induced cumulative alterations in expression of DDR-related proteins mediating distinct DNA repair pathways and cell cycle control. In the presence of ATRi and CHK1i, olaparib-induced upregulation of proteins determining cell fate after DNA damage (PARP1, CHK1, c-Abl, Ku70, Ku80, MDM2, and p21) was abrogated in PEO1-OR cells. Overall, the addition of ATRi or CHK1i to olaparib effectively overcomes resistance to PARPi exerting anti-proliferative effect in BRCA2MUT olaparib-resistant OC cells and alters expression of DDR-related proteins. These new molecular insights into cellular response to olaparib combined with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors might help improve targeted therapies for olaparib-resistant OC.

Exploiting Synthetic Lethality between Germline BRCA1 Haploinsufficiency and PARP Inhibition in JAK2V617F-Positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are rare hematologic disorders characterized by clonal hematopoiesis. Familial clustering is observed in a subset of cases, with a notable proportion exhibiting heterozygous germline mutations in DNA double-strand break repair genes (e.g., BRCA1). We investigated the therapeutic potential of targeting BRCA1 haploinsufficiency alongside the JAK2V617F driver mutation. We assessed the efficacy of combining the PARP inhibitor olaparib with interferon-alpha (IFNα) in CRISPR/Cas9-engineered Brca1+/- Jak2V617F-positive 32D cells. Olaparib treatment induced a higher number of DNA double-strand breaks, as demonstrated by γH2AX analysis through Western blot (p = 0.024), flow cytometry (p = 0.013), and confocal microscopy (p = 0.071). RAD51 foci formation was impaired in Brca1+/- cells compared to Brca1+/+ cells, indicating impaired homologous recombination repair due to Brca1 haploinsufficiency. Importantly, olaparib enhanced apoptosis while diminishing cell proliferation and viability in Brca1+/- cells compared to Brca1+/+ cells. These effects were further potentiated by IFNα. Olaparib induced interferon-stimulated genes and increased endogenous production of IFNα in Brca1+/- cells. These responses were abrogated by STING inhibition. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the combination of olaparib and IFNα presents a promising therapeutic strategy for MPN patients by exploiting the synthetic lethality between germline BRCA1 mutations and the JAK2V617F MPN driver mutation.

Randomized, two-arm, noncomparative phase 2 study of olaparib plus cediranib or durvalumab in HRR-mutated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A substudy of KGOG 3045

Choosing an optimal concomitant drug for combination with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor based on patient-specific biomarker status may help increase to improve treatment efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of different PARP inhibitor-based combinations in patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations have not been evaluated in ovarian cancer. In this sub-study of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3045, we compared the efficacy and safety of two olaparib-based combinations and biomarkers of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with HRR gene mutations. Patients were randomized to receive either olaparib (200 mg twice a day) + cediranib (30 mg daily) (Arm 1, n = 16) or olaparib (300 mg) + durvalumab (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks) (Arm 2, n = 14). The objective response rates for Arm 1 and Arm 2 were 50.0% and 42.9%, respectively. Most patients (83.3%) had BRCA mutations, which were similarly distributed between arms. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 37.5% and 35.7% of the patients, respectively, but all were managed properly. A high vascular endothelial growth factor signature was associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 1, whereas immune markers (PD-L1 expression [CPS ≥10], CD8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) were associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 2. The activation of homologous recombination pathway upon disease progression was associated with poor response to subsequent therapy. Based on comprehensive biomarker profiling, including immunohistochemistry, whole-exome and RNA sequencing and whole blood-based analyses, we identified biomarkers that could help inform which of the two combination strategies is appropriate given a patient's biomarker status. Our findings have the potential to improve treatment outcome for patients with ovarian cancer in the PARP inhibitor era.

Deciphering the Pathways to PARP Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer

A recent article analyzed paired cell-free DNA among patients with platinum-sensitive BRCA- or PALB2-mutated pancreatic cancer who received maintenance olaparib. Reversion mutations were linked with worse outcomes. These types of paired correlative studies are needed to improve our understanding of drug resistance and guide future clinical trials. See related article by Brown et al., p. 5207.

Small-scale mutations are infrequent as mechanisms of resistance in post-PARP inhibitor tumour samples in high grade serous ovarian cancer

While the introduction of poly-(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR) deficient high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers (HGSC) has improved patient survival, resistance to PARP inhibitors frequently occurs. Preclinical and translational studies have identified multiple mechanisms of resistance; here we examined tumour samples collected from 26 women following treatment with PARP inhibitors as part of standard of care or their enrolment in clinical trials. Twenty-one had a germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutation. We performed targeted sequencing of 63 genes involved in DNA repair processes or implicated in ovarian cancer resistance. We found that just three individuals had a small-scale mutation as a definitive resistance mechanism detected, having reversion mutations, while six had potential mechanisms of resistance detected, with alterations related to BRCA1 function and mutations in SHLD2. This study indicates that mutations in genes related to DNA repair are detected in a minority of HGSC patients as genetic mechanisms of resistance. Future research into resistance in HGSC should focus on copy number, transcriptional and epigenetic aberrations, and the contribution of the tumour microenvironment.

PSPC1 Inhibition Synergizes with Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in a Preclinical Model of BRCA-Mutated Breast/Ovarian Cancer

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective against BRCA1/2-mutated cancers through synthetic lethality. Unfortunately, most cases ultimately develop acquired resistance. Therefore, enhancing PARP inhibitor sensitivity and preventing resistance in those cells are an unmet clinical need. Here, we investigated the ability of paraspeckle component 1 (PSPC1), as an additional synthetic lethal partner with BRCA1/2, to enhance olaparib sensitivity in preclinical models of BRCA1/2-mutated breast and ovarian cancers. In vitro, the combined olaparib and PSPC1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) exhibited synergistic anti-proliferative activity in BRCA1/2-mutated breast and ovarian cancer cells. The combination therapy also demonstrated synergistic tumor inhibition in a xenograft mouse model. Mechanistically, olaparib monotherapy increased the expressions of p-ATM and DNA-PKcs, suggesting the activation of a DNA repair pathway, whereas combining PSPC1 siRNA with olaparib decreased the expressions of p-ATM and DNA-PKcs again. As such, the combination increased the formation of γH2AX foci, indicating stronger DNA double-strand breaks. Subsequently, these DNA-damaged cells escaped G2/M checkpoint activation, as indicated by the suppression of p-cdc25C (Ser216) and p-cdc2 (Tyr15) after combination treatment. Finally, these cells entered mitosis, which induced increased apoptosis. Thus, this proves that PSPC1 inhibition enhances olaparib sensitivity by targeting DNA damage response in our preclinical model. The combination of olaparib and PSPC1 inhibition merits further clinical investigation to enhance PARP inhibitor efficacy.

Emerging treatment approaches for triple-negative breast cancer

Approximately, 15% of global breast cancer cases are diagnosed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), identified as the most aggressive subtype due to the simultaneous absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2. This characteristic renders TNBC highly aggressive and challenging to treat, as it excludes the use of effective drugs such as hormone therapy and anti-HER2 agents. In this review, we explore standard therapies and recent emerging approaches for TNBC, including PARP inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, and cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies. The mechanism of action of these drugs and their utilization in clinical practice is explained in a pragmatic and prospective manner, contextualized within the current landscape of standard therapies for this pathology. These advancements present a promising frontier for tailored interventions with the potential to significantly improve outcomes for TNBC patients. Interestingly, while TNBC poses a complex challenge, it also serves as a paradigm and an opportunity for translational research and innovative therapies in the field of oncology.

Determining magnitude of benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in prostate cancer

The treatment landscape for castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is undergoing significant advancements, particularly with the emergence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and their recent US FDA authorizations. The combination of olaparib with abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone has gained approval for mCRPC patients harboring confirmed BRCA mutations. Subsequently, talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide was approved for patients with mutations in homologous recombination repair genes. Nevertheless, emerging evidence suggests that these treatments may confer benefits irrespective of specific biomarkers. While the understanding of biomarkers in therapy selection for mCRPC is expanding, further data are warranted to provide comprehensive elucidation for guiding clinical practice.

HTS discovery of PARP1-HPF1 complex inhibitors in cancer

PARP1/2 inhibitors (PARPi) are effective clinically used drugs for the treatment of cancers with BRCA deficiencies. PARPi have had limited success and applicability beyond BRCA deficient cancers, and their effect is diminished by resistance mechanisms. The recent discovery of Histone PARylation Factor (HPF1) and the role it plays in the PARylation reaction by forming a shared active site with PARP1 raises the possibility that novel inhibitors that target the PARP1-HPF1 complex can be identified. Herein we describe a simple and cost-effective high-throughput screening (HTS) method aimed at discovering inhibitors of the PARP1-HPF1 complex. Upon HTS validation, we first applied this method to screen a small PARP-focused library of compounds and then scale up our approach using robotic automation to conduct a pilot screen of 10,000 compounds and validating >100 hits. This work demonstrates for the first time the capacity to discover potent inhibitors of the PARP1-HPF1 complex, which may have utility as probes to better understand the DNA damage response and as therapeutics for cancer.

Olaparib and Ceralasertib (AZD6738) in Patients with Triple-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results from Cohort E of the plasmaMATCH Trial (CRUK/15/010)

PURPOSE

Approximately 10% to 15% of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and may benefit from PARP inhibitor treatment. PARP inhibitors may also increase exogenous replication stress and thereby increase sensitivity to inhibitors of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein. This phase II study examined the activity of the combination of PARP inhibitor, olaparib, and ATR inhibitor, ceralasertib (AZD6738), in patients with advanced TNBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with TNBC on most recent biopsy who had received 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease or had relapsed within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. Treatment was olaparib 300 mg twice a day continuously and celarasertib 160 mg on days 1-7 on a 28-day cycle until disease progression. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Tissue and plasma biomarker analyses were preplanned to identify predictors of response.

RESULTS

70 evaluable patients were enrolled. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations were present in 10 (14%) patients and 3 (4%) patients had somatic BRCA mutations. The confirmed ORR was 12/70; 17.1% (95% confidence interval, 10.4-25.5). Responses were observed in patients without germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, including patients with mutations in other homologous recombination repair genes and tumors with functional homologous recombination deficiency by RAD51 foci.

CONCLUSIONS

The response rate to olaparib and ceralasertib did not meet prespecified criteria for activity in the overall evaluable population, but responses were observed in patients who would not be expected to respond to olaparib monotherapy.

Emerging targeted therapeutic strategies for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype of breast cancer that lacks expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), has clinical features including a high degree of invasiveness, an elevated risk of metastasis, tendency to relapse, and poor prognosis. It constitutes around 10-15% of all breast cancer, and having heredity of BRCA1 mutated breast cancer could be a reason for the occurrence of TNBC in women. Overexpression of cellular and molecular targets, i.e. CD44 receptor, EGFR receptor, Folate receptor, Transferrin receptor, VEGF receptor, and Androgen receptor, have emerged as promising targets for treating TNBC. Signalling pathways such as Notch signalling and PI3K/AKT/mTOR also play a significant role in carrying out and managing crucial pro-survival and pro-growth cellular processes that can be utilised for targeted therapy against triple-negative breast cancer. This review sheds light on various targeting strategies, including cellular and molecular targets, signalling pathways, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and immune checkpoint inhibitors PARP, immunotherapy, ADCs have all found a place in the current TNBC therapeutic paradigm. The role of photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) has also been explored briefly.

Theranostic biomarkers and PARP-inhibitors effectiveness in patients with non-BRCA associated homologous recombination deficient tumors: Still looking through a dirty glass window?

Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2) deleterious variants were the first and, still today, the main biomarkers of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors (PARPis) benefit. The recent, increased, numbers of individuals referred for counseling and multigene panel testing, and the remarkable expansion of approved PARPis, not restricted to BRCA1/BRCA2-Pathogenic Variants (PVs), produced a strong clinical need for non-BRCA biomarkers. Significant limitations of the current testing and assays exist. The different approaches that identify the causes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), such as the germline and somatic Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) gene PVs, the testing showing its consequences, such as the genomic scars, or the novel functional assays such as the RAD51 foci testing, are not interchangeable, and should not be considered as substitutes for each other in clinical practice for guiding use of PARPi in non-BRCA, HRD-associated tumors. Today, the deeper knowledge on the significant relationship among all proteins involved in the HRR, not limited to BRCA, expands the possibility of a successful non-BRCA, HRD-PARPi synthetic lethality and, at the same time, reinforces the need for enhanced definition of HRD biomarkers predicting the magnitude of PARPi benefit.

Triggering pyroptosis enhances the antitumor efficacy of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

PARP inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients who harboring mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying PARP inhibitors function beyond DNA damage repair pathways remain elusive, and identifying novel predictive targets that favorably respond to PARP inhibitors in PCa is an active area of research.

METHODS

The expression of GSDME in PCa cell lines and human PCa samples was determined by western blotting. Targeted bisulfite sequencing, gene enrichment analysis (GSEA), clone formation, construction of the stably transfected cell lines, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, western blotting as well as a mouse model of subcutaneous xenografts were used to investigate the role of GSDME in PCa. The combinational therapeutic effect of olaparib and decitabine was determined using both in vitro and in vivo experiments.

RESULTS

We have found low expression of GSDME in PCa. Interestingly, we demonstrated that GSDME activity is robustly induced in olaparib-treated cells undergoing pyroptosis, and that high methylation of the GSDME promoter dampens its activity in PCa cells. Intriguingly, genetically overexpressing GSDME does not inhibit tumor cell proliferation but instead confers sensitivity to olaparib. Furthermore, pharmacological treatment with the combination of olaparib and decitabine synergistically induces GSDME expression and cleavage through caspase-3 activation, thus promoting pyroptosis and enhancing anti-tumor response, ultimately resulting in tumor remission.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight a novel therapeutic strategy for enhancing the long-term response to olaparib beyond HRR-deficient tumors in PCa, underscoring the critical role of GSDME in regulating tumorigenesis.