Granulocyte markers in hypertonic and isotonic saline-induced sputum of asthmatic subjects

The aim of this study was to assess whether hyperosmolarity affects granulocyte mediator levels in induced sputum of asthmatic subjects. A total of 32 mild-to-moderate asthmatics, who inhaled either hypertonic (HS; 4.5% NaCl) or isotonic (IS; 0.9% NaCl) solutions for 15 min, were studied. Selected sputum was used for analysis. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil protein X (EPX), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and free neutrophil elastase (NE) were measured in sputum supernatant. Sample weight, total and differential cell counts, as well as viability and squamous cell percentage were no different after the two tests. No significant differences in ECP, EPX, MPO or NE levels were observed between HS- and IS-induced sputum. Repeatability of the two tests was good for macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, ECP, EPX and NE, but not for lymphocytes and MPO. In conclusion, hyperosmolarity does not affect sputum cell counts and the levels of most granulocyte degranulation markers examined in this study, confirming that both hypertonic and isotonic solutions can be reliably used to induce sputum in asthmatics.

One week treatment with salmeterol does not prevent early and late asthmatic responses and sputum eosinophilia induced by allergen challenge in asthmatics

Salmeterol is an effective long-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator, able to inhibit, as a single dose, asthmatic responses induced by several stimuli including allergen, and the subsequent increase in sputum eosinophilia. Aim of the present study was to investigate whether these effects of salmeterol persisted after 1 week of continuous treatment, or whether a loss of the bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol can occur over time. We investigated in a cross-over double blind placebo-controlled study, the protective effect of 1 week treatment with salmeterol on allergen-induced early and late responses and the associated airway inflammation in 15 atopic asthmatic subjects. Eosinophil percentage and Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) concentration in peripheral blood and in hypertonic saline induced sputum were measured at baseline and 24 h after allergen inhalation. Salmeterol partially inhibited early asthmatic response, but it did not inhibit late asthmatic response in comparison with placebo. Salmeterol did not inhibit also the increase in sputum eosinophils percentage 24 h after allergen inhalation (E%, median: 22.7 and 15%, after placebo and after salmeterol respectively, p=n.s. between two post-allergen sputum samples). Also, the increase in blood eosinophils and both sputum and serum ECP at 24 h after allergen challenge was not affected by salmeterol pre-treatment. In conclusion, 1 week treatment with salmeterol causes a loss of its protective effect on allergen-induced airway bronchoconstriction, and does not prevent the subsequent increase in sputum and serum eosinophilic markers.

Clinical assessment of asthma severity partially corresponds to sputum eosinophilic airway inflammation

In the aim to evaluate the relationship between sputum eosinophil percentages and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) concentrations, as markers of airway inflammation, and different Levels of asthma severity, we examined 223 patients consecutively observed in our asthma clinic. Diagnosis of asthma was made according to internationally accepted criteria. Asthma severity was evaluated according to frequency of symptoms, FEV1, peak expiratory flow variability and level of asthma treatment needed to control asthma. Spontaneous or induced sputum was collected. Adequate sputum samples were obtained in 68 untreated subjects and in 117 subjects regularly treated with ICS. A control group of 14 normal subjects was also examined. In untreated subjects, mild intermittent asthmatics showed a lower sputum eosinophil percentage in comparison with other groups of asthma severity, while no difference in ECP levels was detected. In treated subjects, severe asthmatics showed higher levels of sputum eosinophils and ECP in comparison with other groups of asthma severity. Mild persistent and moderate persistent patients did not differ for sputum eosinophils or ECP in both untreated and treated subjects. Controls were significantly different from all groups of untreated and treated asthmatics. In conclusion, the assessment of asthma severity according to clinical and functional findings only partially corresponds to the severity of eosinophilic airway inflammation as assessed by induced sputum analysis.

Short-term effect of the addition of leukotriene receptor antagonists to the current therapy in severe asthmatics

In a single blind study, the short-term efficacy of the addition of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA: montelukast 10 mg o.d. in 15 subjects, zafirlukast 20 mg b.i.d. in 11 subjects) to the current therapy was evaluated in severe asthmatics, unstable under regular treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids, bronchodilators and, in seven of them, oral corticosteroids. Each subject monitored symptoms, PEF and rescue medication during two weeks with the addition of placebo, and during two following weeks with the addition of LTRA; clinic FEV1 was measured at the beginning and at the end of each 2 weeks period. There was no significant difference in the mean FEV1, PEF, symptom score and rescue medication use between two periods of placebo and LTRA treatments. When two subjects with asthma exacerbation during treatment with LTRA were excluded, FEV1 was higher after LTRA than after placebo treatment (p=0.055). An increase in FEV1>12% pred. at the end of LTRA treatment was observed in five out of 26 subjects (19%). We suggest that LTRA have no overall significant efficacy in severe asthmatics not controlled by high dose inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators, but that a minority of these patients could be particularly sensitive to the positive effects of these drugs. The detection of these 'responders' could be relevant in the treatment of severe asthma.

Fifty microg b.i.d. of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) are effective in stable asthmatics previously treated with a higher dose of FP

Twenty-seven subjects with moderate asthma at the time of diagnosis, well controlled under regular fluticasone propionate (FP) (250 microg b.i.d.) for 6 months at least, were randomized to receive in double-blind fashion: FP 125 microg b.i.d. (Group 1) or FP 50 microg b.i.d. (Group 2) or placebo (Group 3) for 3 months or until symptom recurrence. Daily symptom score and peak expiratory flow were monitored. At the beginning and at the end of the study subjects underwent methacholine challenge and sputum induction. Recurrence of symptoms occurred shortly after randomization in all subjects receiving placebo. None from Group 1 or 2 experienced symptom recurrence during the study. No significant difference in clinical and functional data, and in sputum eosinophil percentages was observed between the beginning and the end of the study in both Groups 1 and 2. Subjects from Group 3 showed a significant increase of sputum eosinophils (P<0.05) and a significant decrease in provocative dose of methacholine (P<0.05) when asthma symptoms recurred. Therefore, very low doses of FP (50 microg b.i.d.) are effective in maintaining for 3 months a good control of the disease in asthmatics already stable under high-dose fluticasone, considering both clinical and functional outcomes and markers of airway inflammation.

Quality evaluation of samples obtained by spontaneous or induced sputum: comparison between two methods of processing and relationship with clinical and functional findings

The aim of the study was to assess, on a large group of spontaneous or induced sputum samples, the difference in quality between slides processed by two different methods, and the relationship between quality assessment and some clinical and functional characteristics of the examined subjects. We examined 631 sputum samples obtained from 337 subjects with proven (n = 291) or suspected bronchial asthma. Of these, 467 samples were processed using the whole-sample method (Group I), while 164 samples were processed using the plug method (Group II). Salivary contamination, cell distribution on the slide, and cell borders were evaluated, and samples were classified as inadequate, adequate, or good. Inadequate samples were equally represented in both groups, while good samples were represented more in Group II. No significant difference in most clinical and functional findings was observed between the different quality categories of both groups. A higher proportion of inadequate samples was observed in Group I samples spontaneously collected. Mild intermittent asthmatics produced a better quality of slides in comparison with other groups of asthma severity. In conclusion, sputum quality partially depends on the different methods of sputum collection and/or processing, although the percentage of inadequate samples is similar for the two methods of processing. Sputum quality is only marginally affected by clinical and functional characteristics of asthma, or by asthma severity.

Comparison of anti-inflammatory and clinical effects of beclomethasone dipropionate and salmeterol in moderate asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists effectively control asthma symptoms and improve airway function. The effects of beclomethasone were compared with those of salmeterol on markers of eosinophilic inflammation in induced sputum in steroid-naive asthmatic subjects with moderate asthma. Fifteen moderate asthmatics were treated with either beclomethasone dipropionate (500 microg b.i.d.) or salmeterol (50 microg b.i.d.) for 4 weeks, according to a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study design. All patients underwent spirometry, methacholine test, sputum induction, and blood sampling before and after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. They also recorded daily symptoms and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Sputum eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX), and blood eosinophils, as well as the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and morning PEF, significantly improved after beclomethasone but not after salmeterol. PEF variability, the symptom score and rescue beta2-agonist use significantly improved after both treatments, although the improvement in the symptom score tended to be greater after beclomethasone. After 2 and 4 weeks of beclomethasone treatment, both serum ECP and EPX decreased. With salmeterol, only serum EPX decreased, after 4 weeks. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine did not change after either treatment. The authors conclude that beclomethasone, but not salmeterol, substantially improves airway inflammation in asthma. Beclomethasone also had an overall greater clinical effect, although the improvement in symptoms and peak expiratory flow variability was similar after both treatments.

Budesonide reduces neutrophilic but not functional airway response to ozone in mild asthmatics

Ambient ozone concentration is related to asthma exacerbation, but few findings are available regarding the effects of pharmacologic asthma treatment on this relationship. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether inhaled corticosteroids inhibit ozone-induced airway neutrophilic inflammation, as detected in induced sputum, and reduce functional response to ozone exposure. Eleven subjects with mild persistent asthma were exposed for 2 h, on separate days, to 0.27 ppm ozone and to air in random order, before and after 4 wk of treatment with budesonide (400 microg twice daily). Before exposure, 1 and 2 h after the beginning of exposure, and 6 h after the end of exposure, pulmonary function was measured, and a total symptom score questionnaire was completed; 6 h after exposure, sputum was induced with hypertonic saline. Budesonide treatment did not inhibit the functional response to ozone exposure, as determined by reduction in FEV(1) and increase in total symptom score, but it significantly blunted the increase in the percentage of sputum neutrophils and interleukin-8 concentrations in the supernatant (p < 0.05). Therefore, 4 wk of inhaled budesonide blunted the airway neutrophilic inflammatory response but did not prevent the functional impairment of the airways after ozone exposure.

Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge can be partially restored by the withdrawal of salmeterol regular treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the withdrawal of salmeterol treatment for 3 days (72 h) can restore its bronchoprotective ability on specific bronchial provocative test (sBPT) with allergen, which was completely lost after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-blind design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated 10 nonsmoking subjects (8 men and 2 women; mean +/- SD age, 24 +/- 8 years) with mild intermittent allergic asthma in the stable phase of the disease, who were never previously treated with regular beta(2)-agonists. Subjects with a previous positive early airway response (EAR) to a screening allergen challenge were considered. They underwent sBPT with allergen after a single dose of inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg (T(1)), and then underwent sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg bid (T(2)); after that, they continued inhaled salmeterol treatment for 4 days, and then changed to inhaled salmeterol with placebo (two puffs bid) for 3 days (72 h) and underwent sBPT with allergen after a single dose of salmeterol, 50 microg (T(3)).

RESULTS

EAR to allergen (DeltaFEV(1) > or = 20% with respect to postdiluent value) was completely abolished by a single dose of salmeterol (T(1); protection index [PI] > or = 50% in all subjects), but it was still present after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (T(2); PI < 50% in all subjects). The maximum FEV(1) percentage fall during sBPT with allergen was significantly lower after withdrawal of regular inhaled salmeterol (T(3)) than after regular treatment with salmeterol (T(2)) (mean, 23% vs 29.5%; range, 4 to 41% vs 18 to 49%, respectively; p < 0.05); a similar result was obtained considering the PI of salmeterol on sBPT with allergen (mean, 44% vs 20%; range, 2 to 86% vs - 11 to 49%, respectively; p < 0.05). However, the maximum FEV(1) percentage fall and PI were significantly different in T(3) than after T(1), and only 4 of 10 patients showed in T(3) a PI > or = 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen-induced EAR, completely lost after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol, may be partially restored by the withdrawal of salmeterol therapy for 3 days (72 h). However, this withdrawal time period is not sufficient to recover the baseline bronchoprotective efficacy of the first dose of salmeterol.

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on cough threshold in patients with bronchial asthma

In asthmatic subjects cough can be related to the degree of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with high dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) on cough threshold in asthmatic subjects. Cough threshold to inhaled capsaicin (one breath of 10(-8)-10(-4)M solution) and to citric acid (one breath of 10(-4)-1 M), expressed as provocative concentration of two (PC2) and four coughs (PC4), was measured in 16 normal and 36 asthmatic subjects. After baseline evaluation, asthmatic subjects were randomized in two groups: (a) Group A, n=20: treated with salbutamol (200 microg t.i.d.) plus BDP (500 microg t.i.d.); (b) Group B, n=16: treated with salbutamol plus placebo in the same doses. After 1 month, cough threshold and clinical and functional evaluation were repeated. After treatment, asthmatics of group A showed a significant improvement in PC4 citric acid, in total symptom and cough scores, and in PD20FEV1 methacholine. In asthmatics of group B, treatment caused no improvement in symptoms, PD20FEV1 methacoline and cough threshold. In addition, cough threshold was not different between normal and asthmatic subjects and, in asthmatics, cough threshold did not correlate with PD20FEV1 methacholine. These data confirm that cough in asthma can be partially related to airway inflammation.

Evidence for two distinct subgroups of alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) from france and italy and their relationships with other AMV strains Brief report

The nucleotide sequence of the putative coat protein open reading frame of seven previously uncharacterized AMV strains from Italy and France was determined and aligned with comparable sequences of other AMV strains (425 L, 425 M, YSMV, S, VRU, 15/64 and Da). The data set of AMV sequences was used to determine phylogenetic relationships by both a stochastic (stationary Markov model) and a deterministic method (maximum-parsimony) of analysis. The topology of the trees obtained with the two methods was essentially the same showing that all AMV strains clustered in two monophyletic groups. Close clustering of Italian strains in subgroup I and of French strains in subgroup II seems to suggests the effect of geographic distinctiveness of evolutionary dynamics of these AMV strains. This separation did not correlate with differences in host range or symptoms (necrotic or non necrotic) induced in tomato but rather it reflected variations in the amino acid sequence of their CP, which might be related to structural properties of virus particles. A simple and rapid procedure based on the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) followed by ezymatic digestion (RFLP) was developed to identify and classify AMV isolates into the two subgroups. The method applied to a number of other AMV isolates from Italy and France supported their division in two distinct subgroups. This RT-PCR RFLP method may be useful way to investigate the dynamics of AMV populations in nature.

Analysis of induced sputum before and after withdrawal of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients

To assess whether sputum eosinophilia predicts the recurrence of asthma symptoms after withdrawal of therapy in moderate stable asthmatics on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 30 subjects with stable asthma, asymptomatic, with low PEF variability measured over two run-in weeks, on treatment with low-dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP, 250 microgram b.i.d. in the last 3 months). At the end of the run-in, all patients underwent a methacholine challenge test and sputum induction (T1). They then stopped therapy and received either placebo (20 subjects, study group) or BDP at the same dose as in the previous 3 months (10 subjects, control group). They continued to monitor PEF and symptom score for 3 months, or until asthma symptoms recurred (diurnal and nocturnal symptom score >/=2 on two consecutive days). At the end of the study (T2), i.e., either within 5 days from the beginning of asthma symptoms or after 3 months in subjects without recurrence of asthma symptoms, all subjects repeated the methacholine challenge test and sputum induction. In the placebo-treated group, sputum eosinophils at T1 were significantly higher in subjects who subsequently developed recurrence of asthma symptoms (n = 7) after cessation of treatment than in subjects who remained asymptomatic for 3 months (8.2% [0-56.6] vs 0.9% [0-11], P < 0.05). At the time of recurrence of asthma symptoms, sputum eosinophil percentages significantly increased (from 8.2% [0-56.6] to 16.6% [5.8-73.6], P < 0.05). The positive predictive value of sputum eosinophils for the recurrence of asthma symptoms was 71%, while the negative predicting value was 84%. In the BDP-treated control group, none of the subjects experienced recurrence of asthma symptoms, and sputum eosinophil percentages measured at the beginning (T1) and at the end (T2) of the study were similar. Sputum eosinophil percentages may vary over a wide range in asthmatic subjects, although regularly treated and apparently well controlled. However, high sputum eosinophil percentages are related to early recurrence of asthma symptoms after cessation of inhaled corticosteroids.

Natural exposure to pollen reduces the threshold but does not change the pattern of response to the allergen in allergic subjects

It is known that exposure to seasonal allergen in sensitized asthmatics increases non-specific bronchial responsiveness, but it is controversial if exposure to seasonal allergen influences the presence and the severity of the late asthmatic response (LAR) to allergen. Fifteen asthmatic subjects sensitized to grass pollen performed a specific bronchial provocative test (sBPT) with Phleum pratensis extract before and during the pollen season. Changes of methacholine were also assessed. Allergen PD20FEV1 significantly decreased during the pollen season with respect to outside (allergen PD20FEV1, geometric mean: 0.10 vs. 0.23 biological units; P < 0.05), but the pattern of specific airway response did not change. Particularly, a consistent LAR was observed in three subjects outside the pollen season and in two subjects during the pollen season. Seven subjects with isolated early asthmatic response (EAR) outside the season did not show LAR after allergen inhalation during the pollen season. However, four of five subjects with slight LAR outside the pollen season (deltaFEV1% between 15 and 20%) lost LAR during season. Methacholine sensitivity increased slightly but significantly from outside to during the pollen season. This increase was greater in subjects with LAR outside the pollen season. The natural exposure to pollen induces an increase in bronchial sensitivity to allergen in sensitized subjects, but it does not induce LAR in subjects without LAR outside the pollen season.

The protective effect of salbutamol inhaled using different devices on methacholine bronchoconstriction

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, inhaled by different devices (pressurized metered-dose inhaler [pMDI; Ventolin; GlaxoWellcome; Greenford, UK], pMDI + spacer [Volumatic; GlaxoWellcome], or breath-activated pMDI [Autohaler; 3M Pharmaceuticals; St. Paul, MN]) on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study.

PATIENTS

Eighteen subjects with stable, moderate asthma, asymptomatic, receiving regular treatment with salmeterol, 50 microg bid, and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, 250 microg bid, in the last 6 months, with high hyperreactivity to methacholine (baseline provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PD(20)] geometric mean [GM], 0.071 mg). Subjects were classified into two groups: subjects with incorrect (n = 5) pMDI inhalation technique, and subjects with correct (n = 13) inhalation technique.

METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS

After cessation of therapy for 3 days, all subjects underwent four methacholine challenge tests, each test 1 week apart, each time 15 min after inhalation of salbutamol, 100 microg (via pMDI, pMDI + spacer, or Autohaler), or placebo. The protective effect on methacholine challenge test was evaluated as the change in the PD(20), and expressed in terms of doubling doses of methacholine in comparison with placebo treatment.

RESULTS

The PD(20) was significantly higher after salbutamol inhalation than after placebo inhalation, but no significant difference was observed among the three different inhalation techniques. Only when salbutamol was inhaled via pMDI + spacer, PD(20) was slightly but not significantly higher (pMDI GM, 0.454 mg; pMDI + spacer GM, 0.559 mg; and Autohaler GM, 0.372 mg; not significant [NS]) than other inhalation techniques. Similar results (mean +/-SEM) were obtained with doubling doses of methacholine (pMDI, 2 +/- 0.47; pMDI + spacer, 3 +/- 0.35; and Autohaler, 2.4 +/- 0.40; NS). No significant difference was found among techniques when subjects with correct or incorrect inhalation technique were separately considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is not affected by the different inhalation techniques, although inhalation via pMDI + spacer tends to improve the bronchoprotective ability of salbutamol. These data confirm the clinical efficacy of salbutamol, whatever the device, and the patient's inhalation technique.

Expression of a plant virus non-structural protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes membrane proliferation and altered mitochondrial morphology

Carnation Italian ringspot tombusvirus encodes a protein, referred to as 36K, that possesses a mitochondrial targeting signal and two transmembrane segments which are thought to anchor this protein to the outer membrane of the mitochondrial envelope of infected plant cells. To determine the topology of the virus protein inserted in the cell membrane, as well as the sequence requirements for targeting and insertion, an in vivo system was set up in which this could be analysed in the absence of productive virus infection. The 36K protein was expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in native form or fused to the green fluorescent protein. Using a fluorescence microscope, large green-fluorescing cytoplasmic aggregates were visible which stained red when cells were treated with the vital stain MitoTracker, which is specific for mitochondria. These aggregates were shown by electron microscopy to be composed of either mitochondria or membranes. The latter type was particularly abundant for the construct in which the green fluorescent protein was fused at the N terminus of the 36K protein. Immunoelectron microscopy demonstrated that the viral protein is present in the anomalous aggregates and Western blot analysis of protein extracts showed 36K to be resistant to alkaline, urea or salt extraction, a property of integral membrane proteins.

Comparison of different long-term asthma treatments in subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma

In order to compare the efficacy of different asthma treatment in subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma, three groups of 11 patients were treated with nedocromil sodium (NS), beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and beclomethasone dipropionate plus salmeterol (BDP + S) in an open, randomized study. Symptom score, peak expiratory flow (PEF) maximal amplitude, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and methacholine reactivity were measured at the baseline and at intervals of 3 months up to 12 months. After 3 months, symptoms reduced significantly in all treatment groups, while PEF variability improved in BDP and BDP + S groups; FEV1 and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine were significantly improved in comparison with baseline value in the BDP + S group only. No significant difference was observed after 6 and 12 months of treatment in PEF variability, FEV1 or bronchial hyperreactivity in the NS group compared with baseline values, while a significant difference was observed in symptom score. BDP group showed a significant improvement in FEV1 and bronchial reactivity to methacholine after 6 and 12 months of treatment. In the BDP + S group, the improvement in symptoms and pulmonary function persisted until the end of the study. In conclusion, the combination of beclomethasone dipropionate and salmeterol improved pulmonary function and bronchial reactivity earlier than beclomethasone dipropionate alone, while nedocromil sodium improved symptoms but not pulmonary function. Assuming that bronchial reactivity could be an indirect measurement of airway inflammation, overtreatment of asthma in relationship with the classification of asthma severity of the International Guidelines could improve both airway inflammation and the prognosis of airway obstruction.

Effect of a single dose of salmeterol on the increase in airway eosinophils induced by allergen challenge in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND

The long acting beta2 agonist salmeterol is very effective in preventing asthmatic responses to specific stimuli, and this effect could theoretically be due to some anti-inflammatory property in addition to bronchodilator property.

METHODS

The protective effect of a single dose of salmeterol (50 microg) on allergen induced early and late responses and on the associated airway inflammation was investigated in a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study in 11 atopic asthmatic subjects. Eosinophil percentages and concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in peripheral blood and in hypertonic saline induced sputum were measured 24 hours after allergen inhalation.

RESULTS

Salmeterol effectively inhibited both early and late asthmatic responses in comparison with placebo. Salmeterol also inhibited the increase in the percentage of eosinophils in the sputum 24 hours after allergen inhalation (median (range) baseline 6% (1-36), after placebo 31% (5-75), after salmeterol 12% (1-63)). However, the increase in both sputum and serum ECP concentrations 24 hours after allergen challenge was not affected by pretreatment with salmeterol.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of salmeterol inhibits the allergen induced airway responses and the increase in sputum eosinophils after allergen challenge.

Salbutamol pretreatment does not change eosinophil percentage and eosinophilic cationic protein concentration in hypertonic saline-induced sputum in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND

Sputum induction by inhalation of hypertonic saline (HS) is usually preceded by beta2-agonist pretreatment, to prevent severe bronchoconstriction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether salbutamol pretreatment may influence cell counts and concentrations of soluble mediators in induced sputum.

METHODS

We studied 22 patients who randomly underwent HS sputum induction after pretreatment with either 200 microg salbutamol or placebo. Sputum was induced by means of HS inhalation (3, 4, 5% NaCl, 10 min each), measuring FEV1 every 5 min until it fell >/= 20% from baseline. Collected sputum was diluted 1 : 1 with 0.1% DTT, incubated at 37 degrees C for 20 min, and total and differential cell counts were measured. ECP and histamine levels were measured in the supernatant.

RESULTS

Sputum volume, percentages of inflammatory cells, squamous cell counts and quality of the slides were not different after the two pretreatments, while sputum total inflammatory cells after salbutamol tended to be higher than after placebo (8.3 [1-41] 10(6) vs 6.3[0.2-40] x10(6); P = 0.09). Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) did not significantly change (260 [8-900] microg/L after salbutamol vs 200 [8-800] microg/L, n = 19), while histamine levels tended to be lower after salbutamol (140.9 [39.9-236.5] nm) than after placebo (190.4 [72. 2-322.6] nm, P = 0.09, n = 17). The airway response to HS inhalation was significantly greater after placebo and the duration of the test was significantly different (median: 15 min after placebo and 30 min after salbutamol). Similar results were obtained when patients who differed for more than 15 min in the duration of HS-inhalation in the two tests were selected (n = 11).

CONCLUSION

Salbutamol pretreatment reduces the severity of bronchoconstriction induced by HS inhalation without significantly affecting the percentages of inflammatory cells and the levels of soluble mediators in induced sputum.

Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate reverts tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge

STUDY OBJECTIVE

One week of regular treatment with salmeterol can induce tolerance to the protective effect of a beta2-agonist on early airway response to allergen (EAR). The objective was to assess whether inhaled corticosteroids revert tolerance to salmeterol.

STUDY DESIGN

The study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve subjects with mild allergic asthma and positive result of specific bronchial provocation test (sBPT) to allergen underwent three sBPTs, separated by 1 week. sBPT was done in all subjects after a single dose (T1) and after 1 week of regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol (50 microg bid) (T2) in order to induce tolerance. Subjects were then randomized to receive either the same dose of salmeterol + beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP, 500 microg bid) (group 1, n = 6) or placebo + BDP (group 2, n = 6) for 1 week before sBPT (T3).

RESULTS

After a single dose of salmeterol (T1), all subjects were protected against EAR, whereas after 1 week of regular treatment, the protective effect of salmeterol was totally or partially lost (T2). Maximum FEV1 percent fall (MaxdeltaFEV1%) after allergen inhalation was significantly higher at T2 than at T1. All subjects except one of group 1 were protected against EAR after salmeterol + BDP (T3), and MaxdeltaFEV1% at T3 (median, 12%; range, 4 to 6%) was significantly lower than T2 (median, 22%; range, 12 to 43%; p < 0.05 by Wilcoxon test). Subjects of group 2 did not show any significant protection against EAR after placebo + BDP treatment (T3) MaxdeltaFEV1% at T2 (median, 31%; range, 9 to 40%) and T3 (median, 31%; range, 3 to 42%; not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the addition of inhaled BDP partially restored the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge that was lost after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol alone. This ability of BDP in reverting tolerance cannot be ascribed to a direct effect of corticosteroids per se on allergen challenge in this group of asthmatics.

Airway inflammatory response to ozone in subjects with different asthma severity

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ozone exposure induces a similar airway inflammatory response in subjects with different degrees of asthma severity. Two groups of asthmatic subjects were studied: seven with intermittent mild asthma not requiring regular treatment (group A); and seven with persistent mild asthma requiring regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists (group B). All subjects were exposed, in a randomized cross-over design, to air or O3 (0.26 parts per million (ppm) for 2 h with intermittent exercise); subjects in group B withdrew from regular treatment 72 h before each exposure. Before the exposure, and 1 and 2 h after the beginning of the exposure they performed a pulmonary function test, and a questionnaire was completed to obtain a total symptom score (TSS). Six hours after the end of the exposure, hypertonic saline (HS) sputum induction was conducted. Sputum cell percentages, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and interleukin (IL)-8 concentrations in the sputum supernatant were measured. TSS significantly increased and forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) significantly decreased after O3 exposure in comparison with air exposure in group A, whereas no changes were observed in group B except for a significant decrement of FEV1 2 h after the beginning of O3 exposure. Sputum neutrophil percentage was significantly higher after O3 exposure than after air exposure in both groups (Group A: 70.2% (28-87) versus 26.6% (8.6-73.2); Group B: 62.1% (25-82.4) versus 27.9% (14.4-54)). IL-8 was higher in sputum supernatant collected 6 h after O3 exposure than after air, only in group A. No change due to O3 has been found in sputum eosinophil percentage and ECP concentration in both groups. In conclusion, the degree of airway response to a short-term exposure to ozone is different in subjects with asthma of different severity. The available data do not allow elucidation of whether this difference depends on the severity of the disease or on the regular anti-inflammatory treatment.

Comparison between eosinophilic markers in induced sputum and blood in asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

The usefulness and safety of the analysis of blood inflammatory markers in asthma are widely recognized. Recently, the analysis of induced sputum has been proposed as a safe, non-invasive tool in the study of airway inflammation in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to test whether sputum analysis is more useful than blood analysis in the evaluation of airway inflammation in untreated and treated asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Twelve untreated patients with mild to moderate asthma underwent a methacholine challenge test, sputum induction and blood sampling. A group of 14 normal subjects was also evaluated for baseline comparison. The same evaluation was repeated after 3 months of budesonide treatment. Before and after treatment, we tested the relationship of eosinophilic markers in induced sputum and blood with clinical and functional data. We also compared eosinophilic markers in induced sputum with the same markers in blood.

RESULTS

Untreated patients showed a significant relationship between sputum eosinophils and symptom score, and between sputum eosinophilic cationic protein and symptom score, FEV1 and PD20FEV1. No relationship between blood eosinophilic markers and clinical or functional data was observed. In budesonide-treated patients, both sputum and blood eosinophils were significantly lower than in untreated patients, but eosinophil decrease was greater in sputum than in blood. Sputum eosinophilic proteins were also significantly lower in treated patients, whereas serum eosinophilic proteins were low at baseline and remained unchanged after treatment. Sputum eosinophilic markers were lower in normal subjects than in both untreated and treated patients, while blood eosinophils, but not serum eosinophilic cationic protein, were lower in normals than in untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of induced sputum is more useful than the analysis of blood in the evaluation of asthma severity and of the effect of glucocorticoid treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Leukocyte counts in hypertonic saline-induced sputum in subjects with occupational asthma

We measured markers of eosinophilic inflammation in the blood and in the sputum induced by hypertonic saline (HS) inhalation of 24 subjects with occupational asthma who were still exposed to high molecular weight compounds (HMWCs, n = 8) or to low molecular weight compounds (LMWCs, n = 16); all subjects were symptomatic and showed bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine at the time of study. Sputum cell counts were also measured in 14 normal subjects and in 24 subjects with non-occupational asthma with asthma severity similar to that of occupational asthmatics. Both occupational and non-occupational asthmatic subjects showed higher neutrophil percentages in HS-induced sputum than normal subjects, asthmatics with LMWC-induced asthma showing the highest values. Eosinophil percentages in HS-induced sputum were higher in non-occupational asthmatics and in asthmatics with HMWC-induced asthma than in normal subjects and in subjects with occupational asthma due to LMWCs. No difference in bronchial responsiveness, peak expiratory flow variability and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were observed among the different asthma groups. Although sputum eosinophil percentages significantly correlated with blood eosinophil percentages, sputum allowed the detection of a higher number of subjects with eosinophilic inflammation than blood. Serum ECP levels were normal in most asthmatic subjects. A significant correlation between sputum eosinophil percentages and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to HS was observed. Despite a similar degree of functional abnormalities, subjects with asthma due to LMWCs and still exposed to the occupational sensitizer showed a lower degree of eosinophilic inflammation and a higher degree of neutrophilic inflammation in the airways than subjects with occupational asthma due to HMWCs or non-occupational asthmatics. Furthermore, sputum eosinophil counts detect, better than blood indices, the degree of airway inflammation in both occupational and non-occupational asthma.

Comparison between peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) during bronchoconstriction induced by different stimuli

To evaluate the sensitivity of peak expiratory flow (PEF), obtained by portable peak flow meter, in detecting mild changes in airway caliber as assessed by forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), we studied 184 subjects who underwent different bronchial challenge tests for suspected bronchial asthma. We measured FEV1 and PEF during bronchoconstriction induced by different stimuli: allergen, methacholine, toluene diisocyanate vapors, exercise, or distilled water inhalation; a total of 186 tests were examined. Before and at different times after challenge, FEV1 was measured, and immediately after, PEF was obtained by Mini-Wright or Assess Peak Flow Meter; each time FEV1 and PEF were taken as the best of three satisfactory tracings. The median FEV1 change from baseline value of all steps in the different challenge tests was 7.5% (range: 0-66%). The correlation coefficients between FEV1 and PEF percent changes in different challenge tests were low (Spearman's p: 0.27-0.69), with high scattering of the data. The concordance between classes of percent changes in FEV1 and PEF was also low (Cohen's weighted kappa: 0.28-0.42). In subjects with a FEV1 fall > 15% after challenge, the median PEF change after bronchoconstriction was lower than the corresponding FEV1 change [17% (0-52) vs. 27% (17-66)]. When different cutoff limits of PEF percent change were considered, the sensitivity of PEF to detect a significant change in FEV1 (15 or 20% change) during bronchoconstriction was low; specificity was in general higher than sensitivity. We conclude that PEF and FEV1 changes are poorly related during mild bronchoconstriction induced by different stimuli. The low sensitivity of PEF to detect mild changes in airway caliber may represent a limit in the use of PEF in the day-to-day monitoring of asthma.