Sociodemographic factors and quality of life as prognostic indicators in head and neck cancer

Pre-treatment quality of life (QOL) has been found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in cancer patients, in particular in patients with advanced cancer. Sociodemographic factors such as marital and socioeconomic status have also been recognised as prognostic factors. We studied the influence of QOL and mood (measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Head and Neck Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)) as measured before treatment, the use of cigarettes and alcohol and sociodemographic factors (age, gender, marital status, income and occupation) on recurrence and survival in 208 patients with head and neck cancer prior to treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Cognitive functioning and, to a lesser degree, marital status were independent predictors of recurrence and survival, along with medical factors (stage and radicality). Patients with less than optimal cognitive functioning and unmarried patients had a relative risk (RR) of recurrence of 1.72 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-2.93) and 1.85 (95% CI 1.06-3.33), respectively, and a RR of dying of 1.90 (95% CI 1.10-3.26) and 1.82 (95% CI 1.03-3.23), respectively. Performance status, physical functioning, mood and global QOL and smoking and drinking did not predict for recurrence and survival. The influence of cognitive functioning might be related to the use of alcohol. Marital status may influence prognosis through mechanisms of health behaviour and/or social support mechanisms.

Prediction of depressive symptomatology after treatment of head and neck cancer: the influence of pre-treatment physical and depressive symptoms, coping, and social support

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer and its treatment can have important psychosocial implications, and many patients become depressed. The aim of this prospective study is to examine whether pretreatment variables can be used to predict depression 6 and 12 months later.

METHODS

Head and neck cancer patients (155) treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy completed a questionnaire including items on social support, coping, depressive symptoms, physical functioning, and physical symptoms before and after treatment.

RESULTS

By using 5 variables (physical symptoms, depressive symptoms, emotional support, extent of the social network, and avoidance coping), it was possible to predict those patients who would have symptoms at 6 (81%) and 12 months (67%) after treatment. Inclusion of actual physical symptoms reported at follow-up increased these percentages to 89% and 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that screening for psychosocial variables and physical symptoms before treatment can be used to determine which patients are at risk of developing depressive symptoms after treatment.

A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group

This study tests the reliability and validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) head and neck cancer module (QLQ-H&N35) and version 3.0 of the EORTC Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in 622 head and neck cancer patients from 12 countries. The patients completed the QLQ-C30, the QLQ-H&N35 and a debriefing questionnaire before antineoplastic treatment or at a follow-up. 232 patients receiving treatment completed a second questionnaire after treatment. Compliance was high and the questionnaire was well accepted by the patients. Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed the proposed scale structure of the QLQ-H&N35. The QLQ-H&N35 was responsive to differences between disease status, site and patients with different Karnofsky performance status, and to changes over time. The new physical functioning scale (with a four-point response format) of version 3.0 of the QLQ-C30 was shown to be more reliable than previous versions. Thus, the QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, appears to be reliable, valid and applicable to broad multicultural samples of head and neck cancer patients.

Pretreatment factors predicting quality of life after treatment for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QOL) has become an important issue in head and neck cancer. Explanation of factors predicting QOL after treatment has important implications for patient management.

METHODS

In this prospective study we analyzed which pretreatment factors predicted QOL after surgery and/or radiotherapy with curative intent in a cohort of 153 patients with cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. The patients completed the EORTC Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale before treatment and 6 and 12 months later. The influence of gender, age, performance status, and depressive symptoms at baseline, site, stage, and treatment on QOL (and its dimensions) and depressive symptoms after 6 and 12 months was studied, using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

A high level of depressive symptoms and a low performance status at baseline and combination treatment were significant predictors of increased severity of symptoms and poor functioning after treatment. Treatment was a predictor of head and neck symptoms, whereas performance status and depressive symptoms were predictors of general symptoms and functioning. Gender and age had little predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with depressive symptoms or a low performance status who receive combination treatment for cancer of the head and neck are at risk for physical and psychologic morbidity after treatment. Special attention should be given to these patients in rehabilitation programs.

Long-term quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe prospectively the long-term changes of quality of life and mood in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred seven patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Module, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale before treatment, and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months later.

RESULTS

There was limited deterioration of physical and role functioning and of many head and neck symptoms at 6 months, with improvement thereafter. After 36 months only physical functioning, taste/ smell, dry mouth, and sticky saliva were significantly worse, compared with baseline. Female sex, higher cancer stage, and combination treatment were associated with more symptoms and worse functioning. Despite physical deterioration, there was a gradual improvement of depressive symptomatology and global quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Treatment for head and neck cancer results in short-term morbidity, most of which resolves within 1 year. Despite an initially high level of depressive symptomatology, there is gradual improvement of psychological functioning and global quality of life over the course of 3 years. In this prospective study, the impact of the disease and its treatment in long-term survivors seems to be less severe than it is often assumed to be.

[Sedation in the terminal phase of life]

In 2 patients, a woman aged 38 years and a man aged 48 years, in the terminal phase of life due to metastasized+ malignancy, palliative care failed. They suffered seriously from pain, delirium, restlessness, nausea, and fear. Deep sedation was given to induce almost continuous sleep without the intention of causing death. After one and five quiet days respectively the patients died. Deep sedation is an option when palliative care fails to diminish serious suffering. Midazolam, given by continuous subcutaneous infusion is the drug of choice.

A prospective study on quality of life of laryngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe prospectively quality of life and mood before and after radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with Tis-T3 laryngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale before treatment and 6 and 12 months later.

RESULTS

There was a significant but temporary deterioration of physical functioning, fatigue and most head and neck symptoms. Speech was the only symptom which improved. Patients with T2 tumors had significantly worse physical symptoms compared with patients with T1 tumors. There was a high level of depressive symptomatology at baseline, followed by an improvement after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

After radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer, a temporary deterioration of physical functioning and symptoms occurs, mostly caused by side effects of treatment. Despite physical deterioration, there is an improvement of emotional functioning and mood after treatment, probably as a result of psychological adaptation and coping processes.

Randomized study of a short course of weekly cisplatin with or without amifostine in advanced head and neck cancer. EORTC Head and Neck Cooperative Group

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin is one of the most active cytotoxic agents available for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. In a previous phase II study with weekly administration of cisplatin, a response rate of 51% was achieved. However, only in a minority of the patients the planned high dose intensity of 80 mg/m2/week could be reached because of toxicity, mainly thrombocytopenia and ototoxicity. Amifostine is a cytoprotective drug that can diminish the toxicity of alkylating agents and platinum compounds. Therefore the effect of amifostine on toxicity and activity of weekly cisplatin was investigated in a randomized study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were eligible. Patients were randomized to weekly cisplatin 70 mg/m2 for six cycles preceded by amifostine 740 mg/m2, or cisplatin only. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) as a one-hour infusion; amifostine was administered as a 15-minute infusion directly before the administration of cisplatin.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were entered in the study. The median number of cisplatin administrations was 6 (range 2-6), equal in both arms. In both treatment arms the median dose intensity of cisplatin achieved was the planned 70 mg/m2/week. In the cisplatin only arm 6 out of 206 cycles were complicated by thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 versus 1 of 184 cycles in the amifostine arm (P = 0.035). Hypomagnesaemia grade 2 + 3 was significantly less observed in the amifostine arm (P = 0.04). Neurotoxicity analyzed by serial vibration perception thresholds (VPT) showed a diminished incidence of subclinical neurotoxicity in the amifostine arm (P = 0.03). No protective effect on renal and ototoxicity could be shown. Hypotension was the main side effect of amifostine but only of relevance in one patient. The antitumor activity of cisplatin was preserved as 63% of the evaluable patients in the amifostine arm responded compared to 50% of the evaluable patients in the cisplatin alone arm.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that in combination with weekly administered cisplatin amifostine reduced the risk of thrombocytopenia, hypomagnesemia as well as subclinical neurotoxicity, but did not result in a higher dose intensity of cisplatin. Addition of amifostine did not compromise the antitumor effect of cisplatin.

Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to define the scales and test the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-H&N35, a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of life of head and neck (H&N) cancer patients in conjunction with the general cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Questionnaires were given to 500 H&N cancer patients from Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands as part of two prospective studies. The patients completed the questionnaires before, during (Norway and Sweden only), and after treatment, yielding a total of 2070 completed questionnaires.

RESULTS

The compliance rate was high, and the questionnaires were well accepted by the patients. Seven scales were constructed (pain, swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, sexuality). Scales and single items were sensitive to differences between patient subgroups with relation to site, stage, or performance status. Most scales and single items were sensitive to changes, with differences of various magnitudes according to the site in question. The internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, varied according to assessment point and within subsamples of patients. A low overall alpha value was found for the speech and the senses scales, but values were higher in assessments of patients with laryngeal cancer and in patients with nose, sinus, and salivary gland tumors. Scales and single items in the QLQ-H&N35 seem to be more sensitive to differences between groups and changes over time than do the scales and single items in the core questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, provides a valuable tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical studies of H&N cancer patients before, during, and after treatment with radiotherapy, surgery, or chemotherapy.

A prospective study on quality of life of patients with cancer of the oral cavity or oropharynx treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy

The aim of this study was to describe prospectively quality of life and mood in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer treated with surgery +/- radiotherapy. Seventy-five patients completed the EORTC Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies' Depression Scale before treatment and 6 and 12 months later. There was a significant deterioration of physical functioning, fatigue and almost all head and neck symptoms except pain, which improved. Patients with stage III/IV and patients receiving combined treatment had significantly worse physical symptoms compared to patients with stage I/II and patients treated with surgery only, respectively. Before and after treatment there was a high level of depressive symptomatology. However, after treatment a gradual improvement in emotional functioning occurred. Surgical treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer results in significant deterioration of physical functioning and symptoms during the first year, especially when combined with radiotherapy. Despite this, there is an improvement of emotional functioning after treatment, probably as a result of adaptation and coping processes.

[Joint decisions, how? Physician-patient communication about palliative chemotherapy]

The discomfort and benefits of a medical treatment may be appreciated differently by different patients. This is one of the reasons why patients should be informed thoroughly and included in the decision-making about treatment. The obligation to inform was laid down in 1995 in the Decree on the Medical Contract. In a case of metastasized cancer of the prostate it was decided more or less by mutual agreement between doctor and patient to administer palliative chemotherapy. It appeared subsequently that the physician had short-term palliation in mind, and the patient prolongation of survival. Although both are of the opinion that the patient was included actively in the decision-making, this was in reality not at all the case. The question arises whether the Decree on the Medical Contract does not demand too much from certain patients regarding their capacity to make a decision about the treatment of a terminal disease.

Phase II study of weekly high-dose cisplatin for six cycles in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

In a phase I study of weekly administered cisplatin, we observed a major response in 8 of 9 patients with locally far advanced head and neck cancer. Therefore, a phase II study was initiated to explore the activity and tolerance of this weekly cisplatin regimen. 59 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were entered into this phase II study. Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly for 6 cycles. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) as a 3-h infusion with standard pre- and posthydration. 51 patients were evaluable for response and 55 for toxicity. Only 9 patients were able to complete the treatment with the planned dose intensity of 80 mg/m2/week. Complete disappearance of the tumour was observed in 8 patients and a partial response in 22 (response rate 59%; 51% of all eligible patients 95% CI limits 37-63%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients, and the tumour progressed in 9 patients. 47 patients subsequently received high-dose radiotherapy, 1 radiotherapy and surgery and 4 patients second-line chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival for all patients were 32 weeks and 56 weeks, respectively. Haematological toxicity consisted of anaemia, leucocytopenia (grade 3 + 4 in 17 patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 + 4 in 17 patients). Because of leuco- and/or thrombocytopenia, treatment was delayed in 30 patients while 13 were taken off the study because of delayed bone marrow recovery. Non-haematological toxicities were: ototoxicity grade 1 in 3 patients, grade 2 in 7 and grade 3 in 3 patients; nephrotoxicity grade 1 in 13 patients, grade 2 in 2 and grade 3 in 1 patient. Neurotoxicity grade 1 was observed in only 8 patients. Cisplatin, as a single agent, administered at high-dose intensity, has an antitumour activity comparable with that of combination regimens in locally advanced head and neck cancer. The pattern of toxicity is different: leuco- and thrombocytopenia jeopardize the dose intensity concept; for patients ototoxicity is the more relevant toxicity. Further studies with weekly cisplatin are of interest particularly with newer measures to reduce toxicity.

Phase II study on mitoxantrone in adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck. EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group

BACKGROUND

Based on activity in a case report, mitoxantrone was studied in a phase II study in adenoid cystic carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with symptomatic and/or rapidly progressive metastatic or recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma were eligible for this study. They were treated with mitoxantrone given intravenously by bolus injection at a dose of 14 mg/m2, cycles repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients entered on trial, 4 were ineligible. A median of 6 cycles per patient were given. Leucocytopenia (in 97% of patients) was the most important side effect and tended to be cumulative. Other side effects were mainly mild to moderate and consisted of nausea (62%), vomiting (29%), alopecia (53%) and mucositis (41%). Four of 32 patients had a partial response (12%; 95% CI 4%-29%) lasting 3-13 months, 22 patients (69%) had a stable disease.

CONCLUSION

Mitoxantrone at this dose and schedule has modest activity in adenoid cystic carcinomas.

Results of a phase II trial of epirubicin and cisplatin (EP) before and after irradiation and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an EORTC GITCCG study

The objective of the present study was to define the role of chemotherapy, in the form of the EP regimen, consisting of epirubicin (E) and cisplatin (P) in addition to irradiation in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for treatment of pancreatic cancer. 53 eligible patients with histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with three cycles of E 60 mg/m2 (if this dose was well tolerated then the dose of E was increased by 10 mg/m2 in the next cycle; 80 mg/m2 was the maximum dose for the following cycles) and P 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks, followed after 4 weeks by a split course of irradiation of 40 Gy with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 on each of the first 3 days of each 20 Gy treatment segment. This was followed by another three cycles of EP in patients who achieved stable disease (SD) or a better response after the first three cycles. The treatment given with standard anti-emetics was moderately tolerated. The chemotherapy related toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and the chemoradiotherapy related toxicity of gastrointestinal side-effects. However, due to the long duration of treatment which made the whole treatment difficult to endure, only 18/53 (34%) actually completed the full treatment regimen. Responses were evaluated after the first three cycles and 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment by serial CT-scans using standard criteria. The results in 53 evaluable patients after the first three cycles of EP were as follows: 1 patient achieved a clinical complete response (CR), 7 a partial response (PR) (CR + PR: 15%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11-33%), 36 patients (68%) had stable disease (SD) and 6 patients progressive disease (PD). There was 1 early PD, 1 toxic death and 1 patient could not be evaluated. The response at the end of the treatment was 3 CR, 11 PR (CR + PR: 14/53 (26%); 95% CI: 15-40%), 30 SD and 6 PD. The median time to progression was 8.9 months and the median duration of response 13.1 months. The median survival of all treated patients was 10.8 months (range 7 days to 41.5 months), of responders 15.1 months and, of the patients with SD 10.3 months. These results are comparable to other combined modality regimens reported in the literature for locally advanced disease. The addition of the systemic treatment with E and P offers no additional advantage to combined modality treatment alone.

Randomized phase III trial of edatrexate versus methotrexate in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group study

PURPOSE

To compared the response rates and the toxicity of the new antifolate edatrexate (EDX) with that of methotrexate (MTX) in a randomized trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCC) and to compare the durations of response and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred seventy-three patients with SCC were randomized to receive either EDX or MTX as a weekly intravenous (IV) bolus injection. Doses of EDX were initially 80 mg/m2/wk, but because of the toxicity, this was later reduced to 70 mg/m2/wk. MTX was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2/wk throughout. In both arms, two dose increments of 10% were scheduled in case of no toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 264 eligible patients, 131 were treated with EDX and 133 with MTX. There were five treatment-related deaths: four on EDX and one on MTX. Overall, toxicity was similar in both arms; however, stomatitis, skin toxicity, and hair loss were more pronounced on the EDX arm. The overall response rate was 21% (six complete responses [CRs] and 21 partial responses [PRs]) for EDX and 16% (nine CRs and 12 PRs) for MTX (P = .392). Responses were mainly seen in patients with locoregional disease. Tumors that originated from the hypopharynx responded poorly in comparison to tumors from other sites. The median duration of response was 6.1 months for EDX and 6.4 months for MTX (log-rank P = .262). There was no difference in overall or progression-free survival. The median survival duration was 6 months on both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both EDX and MTX are moderately active against SCC. In this large phase III study, response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appeared to be similar for both antifolates. However, EDX had more side effects than MTX and therefore cannot be recommended for routine palliative treatment of patients with SCC.

Phase II study of sequential high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (F) alternated with epirubicin (E) and cisplatin (P) [FEMTX-P] in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

FAMTX (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, methotrexate) is one of the most effective drug combinations in gastric cancer. Therefore, modifications of FAMTX appear of interest and the FEMTX-P regiment was conceived.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma were treated with methotrexate 1500 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-fluorouracil 1500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; leucovorin rescue 15 mg/m2 orally every 6 hours for 8 doses on days 2 and 3; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 15, q 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Of forty-seven patients evaluable for response, five (11%) achieved complete responses and seventeen (36%) partial responses (total response rate 47%). The median duration of response was 8+ months (range: 5-25+ months). Four of 14 patients with locally advanced disease were successfully downstaged and subsequently resected. The median duration of survival of all patients was 10 months (range: 1-25+ months). Leukopenia grade 4 occurred in 18% of patients and thrombocytopenia grade 4 and mucositis grade 4 in 4% and 2%, respectively. Treatment postponement for hematologic toxicity was necessary in 54% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The FEMTX-P regimen is an active regimen in advanced gastric carcinoma, with acceptable toxicity.

[Combination of 5-FU, high dose methotrexate, epirubicin and cisplatin (FEMTX-P protocol) in non surgical or locally recurrent metastatic gastric cancers]

In this phase II study, fifty patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma were treated with methotrexate 1.5 g/m2 iv and 5-fluorouracil 1.5 g/m2 iv on day 1; leucovorin rescue 15 mg/m2 orally every 6 h for 8 doses on day 2 and 3; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 iv and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 iv on day 15, q 4 weeks. The median age of the patients was 59 years and their median performance status 1. In forty-eight patients evaluable for response, five (10.4%) of the patients achieved a complete response and seventeen (35.6%) obtained a partial response (total response rate 46%; 95% confidence interval: 32%-60%). The median duration of response was 8+ months (range: 5-25 months). The median duration of survival of all patients was 10 months (range: 1-25+ months). Toxicities > grade 2 included vomiting grade 3 (31%), leucopenia grade 4 (18%) and thrombocytopenia grade 4 (4%). Treatment postponement or dose reduction for hematologic toxicity was necessary in 54% of patients. Median survival was 10 months. In conclusion, the FEMTX-P regimen is an active treatment in advanced gastric carcinoma with acceptable toxicity.

Phase II study of edatrexate in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer

A phase II trial of the new antifolate edatrexate (10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin) was performed in thirty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer who had never received chemotherapy. Edatrexate was administered as a weekly intravenous bolus injection at a dose of 80 mg/m2. Sites of metastases included visceral (31%), soft tissue/lymph node/bone (51%), and bone only (18%). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response; there were 3 complete responses (CR) and 8 partial responses (PR), yielding a response rate (CR plus PR) of 34% (95% confidence limits, 17.9% to 50.9%). Responses were seen in soft tissue metastases, in visceral metastases (liver, lung) and in one patient with bone metastases. Median duration of response was 30 weeks (range 12-66 weeks). Substantial toxicity was observed. The dose-limiting toxicities were mucositis, myelo-suppression and skin toxicity. The general toxicity profile was similar to that usually reported for methotrexate, but mucositis and skin toxicity were more pronounced. Edatrexate appears to be an active drug in the treatment of chemotherapy-native patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Imipenem versus gentamicin combined with either cefuroxime or cephalothin as initial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients

A prospective randomized study was conducted to determine the efficacy of imipenem-cilastatin (hereafter referred to as imipenem) (500 mg four times daily) versus combination therapy for febrile neutropenic patients receiving either no prophylaxis or ciprofloxacin for prevention of infections. Combination therapy consisted of gentamicin (80 mg every 8 h) plus either cefuroxime (1,500 mg every 8 h) or cephalothin (1,000 mg every 4 h) for suspected catheter-related infections. Ninety-four neutropenic fever episodes in 87 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall clinical rate of response to imipenem was significantly higher than that to combination therapy (91 versus 74%; P = 0.05). The difference in efficacy was most pronounced in patients with microbiologically documented infections (89 versus 53%; P = 0.025), which were predominantly caused by gram-positive bacteria. Differences in susceptibility may have caused the better rate of response to imipenem. Two of 29 gram-positive bacteria were imipenem resistant, whereas 10 were resistant to cephalothin and cefuroxime and 12 were resistant to gentamicin. No causative gram-negative bacterium and 24 gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 61 fever episodes with ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (oral). In contrast, nine causative gram-negative and five gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 33 episodes without prophylaxis. The difference in distribution proved to be statistically significant for gram-negative (P = 0.0001) as well as gram-positive (P = 0.025) bacteria, indicating that ciprofloxacin effectively prevented the occurrence of gram-negative bacteria and may have contributed to the relatively large number of gram-positive bacteria isolated. Empirical initial therapy with imipenem may be a valuable alternative to combination therapy for neutropenic fever episodes.

A phase II clinical and pharmacokinetic study of Lonidamine in patients with advanced breast cancer

Lonidamine is a substituted indazole carboxylic acid with a unique mechanism of action and early clinical studies have reported anti-tumour activity. In a phase II study 32 patients with previously treated advanced breast cancer were given Lonidamine in a daily divided oral dose of 600 mg. Of 28 patients evaluable for response, three (11%) achieved a partial response (4-24+ months) and three (11%) a minor response. Two patients have stable disease (greater than 3 months) and 20 progressed. Toxicity was very mild. Sixteen (53%) of 31 patients had myalgia which lasted a median of 2 weeks. This was investigated with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in four patients but the changes were unrelated to the degree of myalgia. No other major side-effect was seen, and no dose reduction was required. Lonidamine pharmacokinetics have been investigated in 17 patients 1 month after the start of therapy. Lonidamine was detected in the plasma of all patients, but there was no clear relationship between Lonidamine levels and clinical response or toxicity. Lonidamine appears to be active against advanced breast cancer and its low toxicity would allow combination studies with chemotherapy.

Cellular pharmacokinetics of carboplatin and cisplatin in relation to their cytotoxic action

We have studied the cellular pharmacokinetics of carboplatin (CBDCA), as part of the evaluation of the antitumor activity of CBDCA in cancers limited to the peritoneal cavity in comparison with cisplatin (cDDP). The uptake of CBDCA into L1210 (lymphosarcoma), CC531 (colonic carcinoma), COV413.B (human ovarian carcinoma) and NB1 (human neuroblastoma) cells was 1.5 to 13 times lower than the uptake of cDDP. The uptake of CBDCA into human ovarian carcinoma cells, taken directly from patients, was also 8-20 times lower than cDDP. Platinum concentrations, expressed as a percentage of the total intracellular Pt concentration, were similar for CBDCA and cDDP in cytosol and nucleus/membrane fractions. A second major difference between the drugs was their binding to DNA. Less CBDCA-DNA than cDDP-DNA adducts were formed after incubation at equimolar amounts of drug with isolated salmon sperm DNA (5-25 times less). A 16-69 times higher concentration of CBDCA than cDDP was needed to induce similar changes in cell growth activity (50% [3H]thymidine inhibition) in CC531 and COV413.B cells, indicating that equitoxicity can only be achieved when tumor cells are exposed to higher concentrations of CBDCA than cDDP. Similar toxicity was achieved in CC531 cells after incubation with a 16-fold higher CBDCA dose than cDDP. Comparable intracellular platinum concentrations, however, were obtained with a 10-fold higher CBDCA dose, suggesting that cellular pharmacokinetics of the drugs are different. Regarding drug uptake and pharmacokinetics the mechanism of action of CBDCA differed from cDDP at a cellular level.