POS0502 WHAT IS THE ROLE OF VITAMIN D STATUS IN DISEASE ACTIVITY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH bDMARDs? – DATA FROM A RHEUMATOLOGY CENTER

Background:

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin, mainly involved in the regulation of calcium metabolism, and it has gained increasing interest in recent years because of its potential role in immunomodulatory activity. Recent data suggest that it is negatively associated with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however this is not yet fully understood.

Objectives:

This study’s aim was to investigate if there is any correlation between vitamin D serum levels at baseline, before taking the first biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), and at 6 months after, with disease activity in a cohort of RA patients.

Methods:

This is a cross-sectional study, including all the rheumatoid arthritis patients taking the first bDMARD with evaluation of the vitamin D status at baseline and 6 months after biologic therapy at our Rheumatology Department and registered in the national database (Reuma.pt).

Demographic, clinical and laboratorial characteristics and disease activity measures were collected from the baseline visit and the visit after 6 months of treatment with the first biologic. For the statistical analysis, two groups were defined, based on the serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D, considering the most common cut-off of 30 ng/mL. For comparison analyses between groups, chi-square test was used for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U and T-tests were applied for continuous variables.

Results:

Seventy-seven patients were included, 58 (75.3%) were females; the mean age was 54.24 ±11.0 years and seropositivity was founded in 65 (84.4%) for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and in 58 (75.3%) for rheumatoid factor. The first bDMARD most commonly prescribed were etanercept (28.6%) and rituximab (26%). Regarding the vitamin D status at baseline, the mean serum level for 25(OH)vitamin D was 28.35 ± 18.21 ng/mL, with the majority of patients having vitamin D insufficiency (25(OH)vitamin D < 30 ng/mL) (63.6%). After 6 months of treatment with the first bDMARD, disease activity measures showed that remission or low activity were achieved in 29.9% of the patients, using DAS28 criteria; in 42.9% and 46.8%, according CDAI and SDAI criteria, respectively. Vitamin D serum levels at 6 months were 26.81 ±11.72, with the majority of patients still with vitamin D insufficiency (62.3%).

At baseline, patients with vitamin D insufficiency had greater patient VAS (79.00 ± 19,14 vs 71.71 ± 21.95), greater erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (40.67 ± 23.17 vs 32.46 ± 26.09) and greater Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score (1.75 ± 0.609 VS 1.61 ± 0.659) with neither of them having statistical significance. However, when comparing CRP levels at 6 months, it achieved statistical significance with the Mann-Whitney U-test (1.05 ± 1.79 VS 1.41 ± 5.22; p=0.026).

The same tendency was confirmed when analyzing vitamin D levels at 6 months. Patients with vitamin D insufficiency presented greater patient VAS (55.33 ± 28.82 vs 42.86 ± 28.28), greater ESR (26.19 ± 21.57 vs 21.00 ± 20.38) and greater HAQ score (1.35 ± 0.662 VS 1.34 ± 0.705), although without statistical significance. However, it did achieve statistical significance when comparing baseline DAS28 and HAQ (5.60 ± 0.91 VS 5.38 ± 1.31; p=0.013 and 1.76 ± 0.53 VS 1.59 ± 0.75; p=0.007, respectively).

Conclusion:

Our data failed to demonstrate a statistically significant association between vitamin D serum levels at baseline and at 6 months with disease activity in our RA sample. However, it revealed a positive trend of vitamin D insufficiency related to higher activity disease. Interestingly, it showed that vitamin D insufficiency after 6 months of bDMARD treatment is related to higher DAS28 and HAQ at baseline. Nonetheless, we insist it is of paramount importance to conduct larger studies to confirm these findings.

References:

[1]Bellan M, Sainaghi PP, Pirisi M. Role of Vitamin D in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;996:155-168.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0476 VITAMIN D SERUM CONCENTRATION VARIES ACCORDING TO DISEASE ACTIVITY IN SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Background:

Several studies have shown dissimilar results for the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (25-OH-D) and disease activity in spondyloarthritis (SpA).

Objectives:

This study aims to assess whether vitamin D levels vary according to disease activity in patients with SpA before and after starting treatment with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

Methods:

An observational retrospective study was performed in SpA patients followed in the Rheumatology department of a tertiary university hospital. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt). Patients were assessed for 25-OH-D levels before and after 6 months of treatment with the first bDMARD. Correlation between 25-OH-D levels and disease activity measured by Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at baseline and after 6 months were assessed using student’s t-test for two samples and one-way ANOVA and with post hoc tests for multiple comparisons.

Results:

A total of 189 patients were included. Ninety-seven patients were females (51.3%). The mean age at diagnosis was 34.8±11.2 years and the median disease duration at the start of the first bDMARD was 4.9 years (min: 0.1; max: 46.0). All patients fulfilled the ASAS criteria for SpA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used by 102 patients (54.0%) and conventional synthetic DMARDs by 69 patients (36.5%). At 6 months, 188 patients were treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and one with interleukin-17 inhibitor. According to ASDAS criteria, at baseline 36.8% of patients had high disease activity and 59.5% had very high disease activity. After 6 months of treatment with bDMARD 14.7% of patients have inactive disease, 21.6% low disease activity, 36.3% high activity and 12.6% very high disease activity. The mean value of 25-OH-D at baseline was significantly lower in the group of patients with very high disease activity compared to the patients with high disease activity (21.9±11.1 ng/ml vs 26.1±11.6 ng/ml, p= 0.02). At 6 months of treatment the mean value of 25-OH-D in inactive, low, high and very high disease activity was 31.0±17.1ng/ml, 28.5±11.2ng/ml, 25.8±10.8ng/ml and 19.3 ±9.5ng/ml, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups, as determined by one-way ANOVA (p = 0.001). A post hoc Dunnett T3 test revealed that patients with very high disease activity have significantly lower mean 25-OH-D levels (19.29 ± 9.5) than patients with inactive disease (31.0 ± 17.1, p = 0.025) and low activity (28.5 ± 11.2, p = 0.009). Among the groups with high and very high disease activity, the significance is only marginal (p = 0.068).

Conclusion:

Vitamin D serum concentration varies according to disease activity in SpA. In fact, SpA patients with lower levels of 25-OH-D are associated with higher rates of disease activity, even in patients treated with biologics agents. It is important to be aware of vitamin D level as it can play a role in the management and treatment of the disease, mainly in the most severe patients.

References:

[1]Zhao SZ, Thong D, Duffield S, Goodson N. Vitamin D Deficiency in Axial Spondyloarthritis is Associated With Higher Disease Activity. Arch Rheumatol. 2017 Mar 24;32(3):209-215. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6212. PMID: 30375524; PMCID: PMC6190948.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

POS1067 BASELINE VITAMIN D LEVELS AND DISEASE ACTIVITY AND RESPONSE IN PORTUGUESE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS UNDER bMDARD: DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

Background:

There is growing evidence that vitamin D [25(OH)D]) plays an important role in maintaining skeletal health and modulating the immune system. Epidemiological data indicate that vitamin D deficiency is common in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases, especially in rheumatoid arthritis, but there is little data regarding its association with disease activity and response to therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) under bDMARD therapy.

Objectives:

We aimed to assess whether 25(OH)D basal levels correlate with disease activity and clinical response to the first bDMARD, at 6 and 12 months of therapy, in a monocentric cohort of patients with PsA.

Methods:

This retrospective study was carried out on PsA patients from a Rheumatology department of a tertiary hospital, fulfilling CASPAR criteria and registered in our national database (Reuma.pt), who started the first bDMARD since 2008. Demographic, clinical and laboratory criteria were evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months of biologic therapy. Disease activity was assessed using CDAI, SDAI, DAS28(4V), BASDAI, ASDAS, DAPSA and the response was measured using the EULAR, BASDAI50, ASDAS, ASAS, ACR and PsARC responses. Correlations were made between absolute serum levels of 25(OH)D and continuous variables, as well as associations between different vitamin D cutoffs and disease activity measures and response criteria. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether vitamin D is a predictor of disease activity and therapeutic response.

Results:

We included 81 patients, 41 (50.6%) females; with a mean age of 48.0±11.7 years, a mean disease duration of 9.5±7.4 years and a mean body mass index of 28.4±5.2 kg/m2. Thirteen (16.0%) were smokers. The mean 25(OH)D basal level was 25.5±13.2 ng/ml, 21 (25.9%) had 25(OH)D basal levels ≥30 ng/mL and 31 (38.3%) ≤20 ng/mL. Sixty-two patients (76.5%) were under csDMARD therapy. Golimumab (29, 35,8%), etanercept (28, 34.6%) and adalimumab (10, 12.3%) were the most frequently prescribed bDMARDs. There were only very weak, albeit positive, correlations between 25(OH)D levels and measures of disease activity. The BASDAI50 response at 6 months was associated with higher basal 25(OH)D levels (29.5±14.5 vs 21.5±10.2 ng/mL, p = 0.013); the ASAS20 (33.9±15.9 vs 24.2±12.8 ng/mL; p = 0.023), ASAS40 (31.9±14.6 vs 25.0±13.8 ng/mL; p = 0.023) and ASAS70 (47.0±4.2 vs 26.6±14.2; p = 0.027) responses at 12 months were associated with higher basal levels of 25(OH)D; basal 25(OH)D levels were ≥ 30ng/mL in a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved CDAI (38.9% vs 10.5%; p = 0.027) and SDAI (38.9% vs 7.7%; p = 0.008) remission and ASDAS disease inactive (29.4% vs 7.3%; p = 0.040) at 1 year. In the regression models, basal levels of 25(OH)D were found to be predictors of good EULAR responders (OR 1.315, 1.017-1.213 95% CI; p = 0.037) at 6 months. Basal levels of 25(OH)D were not significantly different in patients who discontinued bDMARD and no significant correlations or associations were identified regarding more specific PsA activity measures, such as DAPSA and PsARC, nor were they predictive of these responses.

Conclusion:

We can conclude that there is a global trend for an association between higher levels of vitamin D and lower measures of disease activity and better therapeutic responses to the first biologic. It was possible to find statistically significant associations with some disease activity measures and response criteria that, although primarily designed for other rheumatic diseases, are often used in PsA.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0137 THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AUTOANTIBODY LEVELS AND THE OUTCOMES OF ANTI-TUMOUR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA TREATMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS - A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY WITH TWO YEARS FOLLOW-UP

Background:

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), autoantibodies namely anticitrullinated protein antibodies (Anti-CCP) have prognostic value, independently predicting radiologic progression. However, the evidence is still controversial about how the autoantibody levels change over time and their role in treatments outcomes and in monitoring disease activity in RA.

Objectives:

This study aimed to characterize the changes of autoantibodies levels (rheumatoid factor (RF) and Anti-CCP) over time and to explore the association between these autoantibodies and the outcomes of the first anti-tumour necrosis factor alfa (anti-TNF-α) therapy as first biologic agent in RA.

Methods:

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted with two years of follow-up. Patients with diagnosis of RA according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and registered on Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt) who started their first anti-TNFα agent (as first biologic) between 2003 and 2018 were included. Patients with positive RA (>30 UI/mL) and/or positive Anti-CCP (>10 U/mL) at their first visit were included. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained by consulting Reuma.pt. Disease Activity Score for 28 joints [DAS28(3v); DAS28(4v); DAS28(3v; C-Reactive Protein (CRP)), DAS28(4v; CRP), delta DAS28(4v)], Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), delta HAQ, Anti-CCP and RF levels were assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Continuous variables are presented with mean, standard deviation, median, quartile 1 and quartile 3. Categorical variables are presented with absolute and relative frequencies. To examine the differences between Anti-CCP and RF levels at baseline, 12 months and 24 months the Wilcoxon test for paired samples was performed. In order to correlate the Anti-CCP and RF levels with DAS28 variables, delta DAS28(4v), HAQ and delta HAQ at baseline, 12 months and 24 months, a correlation coefficient, Spearman’s coefficient, was used.

Results:

A total of 116 patients (mean age of 50.2±10.4 years old; 85.3% female) with RA were included with a median disease duration of 10.5 [5-18.5] years and a follow-up time of 8 [5-14] years. About 49% of patients were FR and Anti-CCP positivity, 38% only FR positivity and 13% only Anti-CCP positivity. At baseline, 64 (55.2%) patients had an erosive disease and 50 (43.1%) had extra-articular manifestations. Compared to the baseline (160[74.8-496]), FR levels decreased significantly at 12 months (121[49.1-321.8]) and 24 months (107.5[43.3-332]) with a p=0.017 and p=0.029, respectively. There were no differences in Anti-CCP levels over time. No correlation was found between FR/Anti-CCP levels and different DAS28 variables, DAS28(4v) delta, HAQ, and HAQ delta at 12 months and 24 months.

Conclusion:

We found that in patients with RA treated with a first anti-TNF-α agent as first biologic, FR levels decreased at 12 months and 24 months follow-up. However, our study failed to demonstrate a correlation between autoantibodies levels and disease activity (DAS28 variables and delta DAS28(4v)), HAQ and delta HAQ. In fact, previous research demonstrated that there is an association between autoantibodies levels and disease activity in RA, nonetheless not being static and increasing with signs of inflammation at baseline. So, further research with large samples is needed to explore this correlation considering the adjustment for confounding inflammatory variables, such as number of swollen or tender joints and morning stiffness.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0835 IS BASELINE VITAMIN D STATUS RELATED WITH THE RESPONSE TO BDMARDS IN SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS?

Background:

Vitamin D is thought to have an important role in immune regulation and is being subject of research in several autoimmune diseases. Some data suggest that vitamin D deficiency is common in Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and may be associated with disease activity and structural damage.

Objectives:

To evaluate if there is a relation between baseline vitamin D status and the response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in a SpA monocentric cohort.

Methods:

Retrospective study including all the SpA patients (ASAS classification criteria) followed at our Rheumatology Department, registered in the national database and treated with bDMARD between June 2008 and July 2020. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data (including 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25-OHvitD]) at baseline and disease activity measures at 6 and 12 months of treatment with the first bDMARD were collected. Correlations between variables were evaluated by Spearman rank test, Mann-Whitney U test was used to the comparison analysis between groups and univariate logistic regression was used in the prediction analysis.

Results:

A total of 195 SpA patients were included: 103 (52.8%) females, 47 (24.1%) smokers and 91 (46.7%) HLA-B27 positive; 139 (71.3%) had Ankylosing Spondylitis, 18 (9.2%) had Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated SpA and 38 (19.5%) had Undifferentiated SpA. At the time of the first bDMARD, the mean age was 43.5 years (±9.6) and the median disease duration was 12.4 years (0.7-52.7). The mean ASDAS-CPR (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein) was 3.9 (±0.8) and, in addition, 61 (31.3%) patients had 25-OHvitD levels below 30 ng/mL and 12 (6.2%) had 25-OHvitD levels below 20 ng/mL. Fifty-three patients (27.2%) were taking NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), 77 (39.5%) were under csDMARDs (conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs). Adalimumab (56%) and golimumab (33.3%) were the most frequently initiated bDMARDs in the first line.

There were no statistically significant correlations between baseline 25-OHvitD levels and ASDAS-CRP at 6 (r=0.031; p=0.714) and 12 months (r=0.035; p=0.672) of bDMARD.

In the subgroup analysis: there were no statistically significant differences in the response to bDMARD at 6 and 12 months evaluated by ASDAS response and ASAS 20, 40 and 70 responses according to the baseline 25-OHvitD levels (25-OHvitD <20ng/mL vs ≥20ng/mL; 25-OHvitD <30ng/mL vs ≥30ng/mL); and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline 25-OHvitD levels at baseline according to the response to bDMARD at 6 and 12 months of bDMARD (ASDAS: no response vs clinically important improvement or major improvement; ASAS 20: no response vs response).

In the line of these previous results, baseline 25-OHvitD levels did not predict the ASDAS response at 6 (OR 0.97 [0.95-1.00], 95% CI) or 12 (OR 0.98 [0.95-1.01], 95% CI) months of bDMARD.

Conclusion:

Despite some data that suggest that lower levels of 25-OHvitD may be associated with higher disease activity in SpA, our results failed to demonstrate that the baseline 25-OHvitD levels can be related or predict treatment response after 6 and/or 12 months of therapy with the first bDMARD in real-life SpA patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1106 FRAX AND THE EFFECT OF TERIPARATIDE ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN SECONDARY OSTEOPOROSIS

Background:

Teriparatide has been shown to increase spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) and to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. (1) It is currently not clear whether the effect of teriparatide is dependent on the baseline risk of fracture or osteoporosis (OP) type, a finding that could have an impact on our therapeutic decision.

Objectives:

Investigate if there is a relationship between teriparatide effect in BMD and baseline 10-year fracture probability, assessed using FRAX®, in primary and secondary OP patients.

Methods:

This is a longitudinal, retrospective study including consecutive patients with the diagnosis of OP treated with teriparatide for 24 months, with a ten-year follow-up period, at our rheumatology department. Demographic, clinical, laboratorial, BMD and occurrence of fracture data were collected. The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture was estimated using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) v 4.1 with the Portuguese population reference. Statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS 23.0. Correlations between continuous variables were evaluated with spearman coefficient. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Eighty patients (88.8% female, median age 65.00 (59; 75)) were included. Forty-nine patients (61.3%) has secondary OP, mainly of cortisonic etiology (61.2%, n=30). Before treatment, median lumbar spine BMD was 0.870 [0.767, 0.964] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.60 (-3.30, -1.90); median total femur BMD was 0.742 [0.667, 0.863] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.10 (-2.80, -1.30); median femoral neck BMD was 0.671 [0.611, 0.787] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.50 [-3.20, -1.85]. Regarding fracture risk, median FRAX-based 10-year major fracture risk (with BMD) at baseline was 16% [10.0; 23], and median hip fracture risk was 7.2% [3.4; 13.8].

The median variation of BMD, after finishing teriparatide treatment, in the spine was 0.107 [0.029; 0.228]; median BMD variation in total femur was 0.013 [-0.013; 0.068] and median BMD femoral neck was 0.046 [-0.002; 0.109]. We observed a numerically superior effect, albeit without any statistical significance, of teriparatide on bone mineral density gain in secondary OP (versus primary OP) at lumbar spine, total femur and femoral neck.

Most patients continued anti-osteoporotic treatment with a bisphosphonate (81.2%, n=65) and, during follow-up, 17 patients had an incident fracture (8 hip fractures and 6 vertebral fractures), median of 5 [1.75, 8.25] years after ending teriparatide.

We found a discrete correlation between FRAX-based hip fracture probability and the variation of bone mineral density in total femur (Spearman’s coefficient 0.248, p = 0.04). There was no correlation between FRAX-based major fracture probability and and the variation of bone mineral density in the spine or femur. When we separately analyze the relationship between the variation in total hip BMD and the FRAX-based fracture risk, depending on whether it is a secondary or primary OP, we find that the correlation is stronger and only remains in secondary OP (Spearman’s coefficient 0.348, p = 0.03).

Conclusion:

Our data suggest that teriparatide could be an important weapon in the treatment of secondary cause OP, particularly cortisonic, and in patients at high fracture risk, although further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

References:

[1]Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V, Bagur A, Malouf-Sierra J, Lakatos P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Body JJ, Geusens P, Möricke R, López-Romero P. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):230-240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0231 OUTCOMES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS UNDER TOCILIZUMAB AS FIRST bDMARD: A REAL-LIFE MONOCENTRIC COHORT STUDY

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most frequent systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, being constantly assessed regarding new disease activity monitoring tools and new therapeutic targets and therapies. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is one of the latest biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) approved for RA’s treatment, usually as a second line agent in daily clinical practice.

Objectives:

Evaluate the different disease and patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing treatment with tocilizumab as the first biologic therapy.

Methods:

All patients with a definite RA diagnosis who had undergone treatment with TCZ as the first biologic therapy at a tertiary hospital’s rheumatology department were included in this analysis. Diverse socio-demographic data, as well as disease and patient related outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months of treatment with TCZ, and posteriorly extracted from the Portuguese register of rheumatic diseases (Reuma.PT). Statistical analysis included non-parametric tests such as Wilcoxon test and univariate analysis using linear and logistic regression models.

Results:

Fifty-one patients were included, 88.2% females, with a median age at introduction of TCZ of 53.5 +/- 10.4 years; mainly seropositive for either rheumatoid factor (66%) or anti citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA; 68%), with an erosive disease (75.6%) and concomitantly treated with a conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) (70.5%). During follow-up there was a statistically significant reduction at 6 and 12 months of TCZ treatment regarding DAS28 (4 variables) (4v) and DAS28(4V)-CRP scores (p < 0.001), SDAI (p < 0.001), CDAI (p < 0.001), 68/66 tender and swollen joint counts (TJC/SJC) (p < 0.001), ESR and CRP (p < 0.001), patient and physician VAS (p < 0.001) and HAQ score (p = 0.01 at 6 months and p < 0.001 at 12 months). Rheumatoid factor and ACPA serum levels weren’t statistically different at 6 and 12 months of treatment with TCZ compared to the initial assessment, as well as the ACR responders at the same 6 months versus those at 12 months. A majority of patients showed good EULAR response at 6 (52.6%) and 12 (56.3%) months, as well as moderate to high mean improvement in ACR core set measures at 6 (53.3±22.7) and 12 (54.3±25.2) months. Assessment of subsequent therapeutic maintenance showed that 75% of patients remained under tocilizumab with an average treatment duration of 48.8±37.7 months. Reasons for switch ranged from adverse effects (63.6%) to primary failure (18.2%) and secondary failure (18.2%). There was a significant reduction in DAS28(4V), DAS28(4V)-CRP, CDAI, SDAI, TJC and SJC, ESR, CRP, patient and physician VAS and HAQ scores between 6 and 12 months of therapy (p < 0,001). ACR and EULAR responses didn’t differ significantly between assessments at 6 and 12 months. In the absence of a representative number of RA patients on TCZ monotherapy, it wasn’t possible to draw conclusions about the need to use combined therapy with a csDMARD for better clinically significant response.

A higher degree of ACR response at 6 months was associated with higher serum rheumatoid factor levels (OR 1.13, p < 0.05) at baseline, while a lower degree of response was seen with higher TJC (p = 0.05) and HAQ score (p < 0.01). ACR response at 12 months was lower in patients with erosive disease at baseline (p < 0.05). Regarding EULAR response criteria at 6 months, there was a negative association with higher TJC (p < 0.05), while at 12 months the negative trend was associated with ESR levels (p < 0.05) and HAQ scores (p < 0.05) at baseline.

Conclusion:

There seems to be evidence of good therapeutic response to TCZ in bDMARD naïve RA patients assessed at 6 months from baseline, without evidence of significant improvement of response measures further down the line. Basal serum rheumatoid factor levels, TJC, HAQ scores and the presence of erosive disease may have some predictive value on the therapeutic response. Further studies comparing TCZ as the first bDMARD in naïve RA patients against TNF inhibitors are needed.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0536 EFFICACY OF TNF INHIBITORS IN MONOTHERAPY VERSUS COMBINATION THERAPY WITH csDMARDs IN PORTUGUESE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: A REAL-WORLD STUDY

Background:

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are a key therapeutic weapon in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and can be used as monotherapy or in combination with other csDMARDs, which are usually used as first line therapy in these patients, although its efficacy is not as well documented as in other rheumatic diseases. The optimal use of iTNF in PsA, as monotherapy or in combination therapy with csDMARDs, is still under debate.

Objectives:

We aimed to compare the response to treatment with TNFi in monotherapy and combined with csDMARDs, as first biologic, in patients with PsA.

Methods:

Retrospective study that included PsA patients followed at our Rheumatology department under TNFi as first biologic, fulfilling CASPAR classification criteria and registered in Reuma.pt. Clinical and laboratory data were collected at the start of the first iTNF and in the last visit of 2019. Disease activity was assessed using CDAI, SDAI, DAS28(4V), BASDAI, ASDAS, and the response measured using the BASDAI50, ASDAS, ASAS, ACR and PsARC responses. Comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U/t-test (categorical and continuous variables, respectively). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of bDMARD failure, and survival analysis to measure persistence under the first bDMARD regarding csDMARD status at baseline.

Results:

We included 99 patients, 47 (47.5% females) with a mean age of 47.9 ± 11.7 years at the start of the first iTNF. Fifty-one patients (51.5%) had symmetric polyarthritis, 26 (26.3%) spondyloarthritis, 16 (16.2%) asymmetric oligoarthritis, 3 (3.0%) distal arthritis and 1 (1.0%) arthritis mutilans. Sixty-three percent were under corticosteroid therapy and 77.8% under csDMARD therapy at the start of the first iTNF (mostly methotrexate, in 55.6% of patients under csDMARD). Etanercept (41, 41.4%), golimumab (25, 25.3%), adalimumab (22, 22.2%), infliximab (9, 9.1%) and certolizumab (2, 2.0%) were the iTNF started in these patients.

Patients who started iTNF as monotherapy had more frequent involvement of axial skeleton compared with combined therapy (54.5% vs 19.5%, p=0.001), were less exposed to corticosteroids (26.3% vs 72.6%, p<0.001) and had higher mean BASMI (3.7±1.8 vs 3.0±0.8, p=0.021) and BASFI (6.7±1.3 vs 4.7±2.5, p=0.036). Patients who were on iTNF monotherapy at the last consultation (43.4%) had lower mean tender (1.0±1.5 vs 3.6±4.3, p=0.002) and swollen (0.2±0.7 vs 0.8±1.0, p=0.012) joint counts, median patient VAS (30±46 vs 50±44, p=0.023), mean CDAI (5.6±4.4 vs 8.7±4.9, p=0.019), SDAI (6.2±4.6 vs 9.1±5.1, p=0.032), and DAS28(4V) (2.2±0.8 vs 2.7±0.9, p=0.047). iTNF failure was not significantly different in both groups. In the regression models, we found that basal DAS28(4V) (OR 1.874, 1.147-3.062 95%CI; p=0,012) was a predictor of first iTNF failure; there were no differences regarding csDMARD status.

When evaluating only patients without spondyloarthritis, we found that, at the last visit, iTNF monotherapy patients still had less exposure to corticosteroids (26.9% vs 54.3%, p=0.002), fewer mean tender (0.7±1.0 vs 2.6±4.4, p=0.006) and swollen (0.2±0.7 vs 1.1±2.5, p=0.025) joint counts, with no other differences observed. In the regression models, we found no differences regarding csDMARD status in these patients, while adalimumab (OR 0.009, 0.001-0.139 95% CI; p=0.009) was a negative predictor of bDMARD failure. Survival analysis revealed no differences between mono- and combined therapy.

Conclusion:

We can conclude that the differences observed regarding csDMARD status in patients with PsA are mainly due to different patterns of arthritis, namely, predominance of axial involvement. In patients without spondyloarthritis, iTNF monotherapy did not differ significantly in terms of response to treatment and disease activity measures, nor does monotherapy predict bDMARD failure and treatment response. These results suggest that iTNF monotherapy is possible in PsA without compromising treatment response.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0327 DRUG-INDUCED LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS SECONDARY TO ANTI-TNF-Α AGENTS IN PATIENTS WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

Induction of autoantibodies is frequently observed in patients treated with TNF-α antagonist and the possible development of drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) remains a matter of concern. The prevalence of DILE secondary to anti-TNF-α therapy is estimated around 0.5-1% and clinical features include arthritis/arthralgia, rash, serositis, fever, myalgias, cytopenias, among others. According to the literature, DILE secondary to anti-TNF-α agents differs in several ways from the clinical and laboratory findings typically associated with classic DILE.

Objectives:

To estimate the incidence of induction of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and DILE in a monocentric cohort of patients with spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis treated with anti-TNF-α agents. To describe the clinical and laboratorial features and outcomes of patients with DILE.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis treated with anti-TNF-α agents, from our University Hospital, who have been registered on the Portuguese Rheumatic Diseases Register (Reuma.pt) between July 2001 and December 2020. Patients with positive ANA (titer > 1/100) before the anti-TNF-α therapy were excluded. Because specific criteria for the diagnosis of DILE have not been established, we considered the diagnosis in case of a temporal relationship between clinical manifestations and anti-TNF-α treatment and fulfillment of ACR/EULAR 2019 classification criteria for SLE. In patients with DILE, clinical features, laboratory findings, systemic therapies and outcome after discontinuation of medication were collected from reuma.pt and medical records. For the clinical and demographic predictors, continuous variables were analyzed using a two-sided t-test and categorical variables using a Fisher’s exact test. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

In the spondyloarthritis group, 290 patients were included (44.8% females, mean age at diagnosis of 33.3 ± 11.5 years and mean disease duration of 15.1 ± 10.4 years) and in the psoriatic arthritis group, 116 patients were included (50.0% females, mean age at diagnosis of 40.1 ± 11.0 years and mean disease duration of 13.1 ± 6.8 years). In our study, we observed high serology conversion rates (positive ANA in 67.9% and 58.6% of patients with Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis, respectively), with similar conversion rates between different anti-TNF drugs. Three patients with spondyloarthritis (1.0%) and 1 patient with psoriatic arthritis (0.9%) developed DILE. Etanercept was the causative agent in 2 cases, infliximab and adalimumab in 1 case, each. Peripheral arthritis (new onset or abrupt worsening) occurred in 2 patients, serositis in 1 patient, constitutional symptoms in 2 patients, subnephrotic proteinuria in 1 patient, lymphopenia in 2 patients and hypocomplementemia in 1 patient. Specific treatment was prescribed to the 4 patients (oral corticosteroids) and they achieved complete recovery. After anti–TNF-α treatment interruption, no patient had recurrent disease. We observed that patients with DILE had a significantly longer disease duration (> 8.4 years; p=0.04) and a significantly longer duration of therapy with anti-TNF (> 4.0 years; p=0.04) when compared to patients without DILE.

Conclusion:

Despite the frequent induction of autoantibodies, the development of DILE secondary to anti–TNF-α agents is rare. Our study demonstrates an incidence rate similar to other studies reported before. The clinical and laboratorial characteristics of our patients with DILE attributable to anti–TNF-α agents differ significantly from DILE due to more traditional agents, as is described in literature. Overall, patients in this study had mild disease that improved after therapy discontinuation, without recurrence of the disease. It seems that a longer disease duration and a longer period under anti-TNF-α therapy may increase the risk of DILE development.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1113 ANTIRESORPTIVE THERAPY AFTER TERIPARATIDE DISCONTINUATION – WHEN IS THE BEST TIME TO STARTING IT?

Background:

Treatment with teriparatide (TPTD) is associated with reduction of fracture risk in patients with severe osteoporosis. This drug can only be used for up to 2 years. After that a treatment course with antiresorptives should be considered, in order to prevent the rebound of bone turnover observed after TPTD discontinuation. In this regard, interest in sequential osteoporosis therapy has grown in recent years but the ideal timing for starting another treatment after TPTD is not well established.

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to assess if the timing of onset of antiresorptive therapy after TPTD discontinuation has implications in total hip bone mineral density (BMD) and in fracture risk.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective cohort study that included patients with severe osteoporosis treated with TPTD 20mcg/day for 24 months and followed for at least 2 more years in the rheumatology department of a tertiary university hospital. For analysis, demographic and clinical data and results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) after cessation of teriparatide were used. For comparison between groups Mann-Whitney U test was used.

Results:

Fifty-five patients with osteoporosis, with a median age of 68 (32-85) years, were included. Forty-nine patients were female (89.1%). Nineteen patients (34.5%) had primary osteoporosis and 36 (65.5%) glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. The median time for initiating antiresorptive treatment was 7 (0-35) months after cessation of TPTD. Forty-three patients (78.2%) started a bisphosphonate, 6 denosumab (10.9%) and 6 patients did not receive any other treatment. The most prescribed bisphosphonate was zoledronate (69.8%). All patients received calcium and vitamin D supplementation. After completion of TPTD regimen 8 patients experienced at least one fragility fracture (14.5%). At follow-up, 37 (67.3%) of patients underwent DXA on average 30.0±15.4 months after starting antiresorptive agents. The median total hip BMD in patients who started antiresorptive therapy in the first 12 months (inclusive) after cessation of TPTD regime was 0,738 (0.587-0.993) g/cm2 and the median total hip BMD of patients who started therapy after one year of discontinuation of TPTD was 0.683 (0.390-0.813) g/cm2. This difference is marginally significant (p=0.067). The median time in starting antiresorptive treatment is higher in patients with new fragility fractures after TPTD than in patients without new fractures however this difference was not statistically significant (10.0 [2-35] vs 6.0 [0-35] months; p=0.393, respectively).

Conclusion:

Although this study is unable to show that anti-resorptive treatment should be started in the first year after discontinuation of TPTD, it is promising since the difference between the medians in the total hip BMD values obtained until one year and after one year are marginally significant. These results can be linked to the small sample size and highlight the need for further studies in this area.

References:

[1]Napoli N, Langdahl BL, Ljunggren Ö, Lespessailles E, Kapetanos G, Kocjan T, Nikolic T, Eiken P, Petto H, Moll T, Lindh E, Marin F. Effects of Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis in Clinical Practice: 42-Month Results During and After Discontinuation of Treatment from the European Extended Forsteo® Observational Study (ExFOS). Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Oct;103(4):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s00223-018-0437-x. Epub 2018 Jun 16. PMID: 29909449; PMCID: PMC6153867.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

POS0488 THE IMPACT OF ANTINUCLEAR ANTIBODIES INDUCED BY ANTI-TUMOUR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA AGENTS ON THE LONG-TERM TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Background:

The seroconversion of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) induced by anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy remains a matter of concern in various inflammatory conditions namely rheumatoid arthritis. However, evidence is still scarce regarding the impact of these autoantibodies on the clinical response to treatment in these patients.

Objectives:

This study aimed to explore the impact of ANA induced by anti-TNF-α therapy on the outcomes of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over two years of follow-up.

Methods:

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted with two years of follow-up. Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and registered on the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt) who started their first anti-TNFα agent as first biologic between 2003 and 2018 were included. Patients with positive ANA (titer ≥100) and/or positive anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies and/or with a diagnosis of SLE at their first visit were excluded. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained by consulting Reuma.pt. Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28), DAS28 delta, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), HAQ delta were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Clinical response was evaluated by EULAR criteria and three response categories were defined: good, mild and no response. The rate of switch of biological treatment was assessed over 24 months. To examine the differences between groups with and without ANA seroconversion independent samples t test for normally distributed continuous data, Mann-Whitney U-tests for non-normally distributed continuous data and Chi-square tests for categorical data were used. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of ANA seroconversion on clinical response to treatment over 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

Results:

A total of 185 patients (mean age of 49.3±10.9 years old; 85.4% female) with a median follow-up of 7 [4-14] years were included. We found an ANA seroconversion rate (titer ≥100) of 77.3% (n=143) with median time of 36 [15-72.3] months. There were no differences among groups regarding age, gender, disease duration, be seropositivity or not (for rheumatoid factor and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies) and have an erosive disease or not. DAS28 delta was significantly different (p=0.035) between group with positive ANA (2.01±1.29) and negative ANA (1.15±1.51) at 6 months. DAS28 was significantly different (p=0.014) between group with positive ANA (5.06±3.39) and negative ANA (3.99±1.43) at 12 months. No statistically significant differences were found in the DAS28, DAS28 delta, HAQ, HAQ delta at 18 and 24 months and in the EULAR response at any time. Switch rate was significantly different between patients with ANA seroconversion (median 1[0-1]) versus absence of seroconversion (median 0[0-1]), p=0.025. In the regression model ANA seroconversion did not predict switch rate and EULAR response over time.

Conclusion:

This study showed that the majority of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with an anti-TNF-α agent developed ANA and that their presence may be associated with worse clinical results (DAS28) at 6 and 12 months. In fact, previous research suggested that a decrease in anti-TNF-α drug concentration due to the production of autoantibodies may lead to worse outcomes of treatment. Moreover, our data demonstrated that patients with ANA seroconversion had a higher switch rate. Despite these results, there are no differences in the EULAR response between the two groups and ANA seroconversion did not predict this response over time. Therefore, ANA induced by anti-TNF-α agents should be monitored in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on treatment must be considered. Further research is needed to explore these results through large-scale prospective studies.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0914 IS THERE AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AUTOANTIBODIES INDUCTION AND LOSS OF THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH ANTI-TNF-α AGENTS?

Background:

Induction of autoantibodies is frequently observed in patients treated with a TNF-α blocker. According to other authors, the incidence of induction of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) varies between 23-57% and 9-33%, respectively. However, it is unknown whether the induction of these autoantibodies affects the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of biotherapy and, consequently, reduces the efficacy and safety of the drug.

Objectives:

To analyze if there is an association between autoantibodies induction and therapeutic efficacy in a monocentric cohort of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with anti-TNF-α agents.

Methods:

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients with axSpA and PsA treated in our University Hospital with a TNF-α blocker as first biologic agent, and analysed the autoantibodies induction rate after 12 (T12) and 24 (T24) months of therapy. Then, they investigated the influence of autoantibodies in therapeutic efficacy at T12 and T24. Clinical evaluation, laboratory findings including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and disease activity and functional scores (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index – BASDAI, AS Disease Activity Score with CPR - ASDAS-CRP, Bath AS Functional Index - BASFI) were collected from reuma.pt and medical records. For PsA patients, Disease Activity Score-28-CRP (DAS28-CRP), Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores were also collected. Patients with positive ANA (titer > 1/100) prior to anti-TNF-α therapy were excluded. Continuous variables were analyzed using a t-test and categorical variables using a Chi-square test. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

In the axSpA group, 235 patients were included, 44.5% were females, mean age at diagnosis of 42.3 ± 12.4 years and median disease duration of 11.5 (IQR 6.0-21.0) years. Positive ANA were observed in 16.9% at T12 and 26.3% at T24 and positive anti-dsDNA in 3.4% at T12 and 3.8% at T24, with similar conversion rates between different anti-TNF drugs and no significant gender difference. A significant difference in ASDAS-CPR was found in axSpA patients with and without ANA at T12 (p=0.047). ASDAS-CPR was 1.16 times higher in patients with ANA comparing to patients without them. However, no difference was found in the others disease activity and functional scores at T12. Furthermore, no significant difference, including ASDAS-CPR, was found at T24. Also, there was no significant difference found when comparing patients with and without anti-dsDNA.

In the PsA group, 94 patients were included, 46.8% were females, mean age at diagnosis of 46.7 ± 11.7 years and median disease duration of 11.5 (IQR 6.5-16.5) years. Positive ANA were found in 14.9% at T12 and 21.3% at T24 and positive anti-dsDNA in 2.1% at T12 and 3.2% at T24. When comparing the groups with and without ANA and with and without anti-dsDNA at T12 and T24, no significant difference in disease activity and functional scores was found.

Conclusion:

This study revealed high rates of serology conversion, similar to the rates described before. The authors found that ASDAS-CPR was higher in axSpA patients with ANA after 12 months of therapy. However, this difference was no longer evident after 24 months. No other significant difference was found between patients with and without ANA or with and without anti-dsDNA. The authors consider that the induction of autoantibodies may interfere with the response to anti-TNF-α therapy in a short and initial period of time. Long-term follow-up data are lacking to say whether that influence will disappear consistently over the long run, as they observed after 12 months of therapy. However, they can state that, a priori, seroconversion should not lead to treatment suspension because of concerns about loss of efficacy.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0478 IN PREVIOUSLY BIOLOGIC-NAÏVE RHEUMATIC PATIENTS WITH DRUG INDUCED LUPUS SECONDARY TO A FIRST ANTI-TNF THERAPY, IS IT SAFE TO SWITCH TO A SECOND ANTI-TNF-α AGENT?

Background:

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) secondary to anti-TNF-α agents results from an immunogenicity phenomena not yet fully understood and is a rare condition. Withdrawal of anti-TNF- α therapy usually leads to total resolution of symptoms, however sometimes immunosuppression is needed. It is not clear if this condition is drug specific or class related. Therefore, there are doubts about the safety of switching to a second TNF inhibitor: will a further anti-TNF-α agent increase the risk of DILE recurrence?

Objectives:

To analyze the outcomes in patients with DILE secondary to an anti-TNF-α agent that switch to a second anti-TNF-α agent.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis from our University Hospital, who developed DILE secondary to an anti-TNF-α agent as a first biologic and switch to a second anti-TNF-α agent. Because specific criteria for the diagnosis of DILE have not been established, DILE diagnosis was considered when a temporal relationship between clinical manifestations and anti-TNF alpha treatment was found and ACR/EULAR 2019 classification criteria for SLE were fulfilled. Clinical and laboratorial features and outcomes were collected from the Portuguese Rheumatic Diseases Register (Reuma.pt) and medical records.

Results:

Six of 617 patients developed DILE secondary to anti-TNF-α agents (2 secondary to etanercept, 2 to adalimumab and 2 to infliximab). These patients had total resolution of symptoms and autoantibodies (ANA and anti-DNAds), induced by the therapy, disappeared after withdrawal of the anti-TNF-α agent implied.

Afterwards, 4 of these 6 patients switched to a second anti-TNF-α agent: 1 to etanercept, 1 to certolizumab, 1 to adalimumab and another to golimumab. The time interval between the two therapies was 2,0 ± 0,8 months. Regarding the outcomes, in all four patients, no DILE recurrence or autoantibodies induction recurrence was observed. These patients have a good response to the new biotherapy, without side effects reported, and a significant clinical improvement was observed.

Conclusion:

Our study results are in agreement with the literature described before. It seems that exist a low rate of DILE recurrence with an alternative anti-TNF-α agent. Thus, this condition seems to be drug specific rather than class related. Therefore, it seems secure to use a second anti-TNF-α agent, even in a short period of time after DILE development. There is no evidence about the best or securest second TNF inhibitor, so any anti-TNF-α agent can be prescribed. A carefully monitoring of symptoms of relapse should be ensured. In conclusion, DILE secondary to a TNF inhibitor should not be an absolute contraindication to the use of a subsequent anti-TNF-α agent.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0112 TNF INHIBITOR MONOTHERAPY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: IS THERE REALLY A DIFFERENCE IN COMPARISON WITH COMBINATION THERAPY WITH CSDMARDS IN REAL-LIFE?

Background:

In Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) has shown advantages concerning efficacy and immunogenicity in comparison with monotherapy. However, in clinical practice, up to 40% of patients under biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) are on monotherapy.

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy outcomes of TNFi in monotherapy and in combination therapy in a RA monocentric cohort.

Methods:

Retrospective, cross-sectional study including all the RA patients under TNFi followed at our Rheumatology Department and registered in the national database. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data and disease activity measures were collected at the last visit of 2019 from each patient. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to the comparison analysis between the two groups (continuous and categorical variables, respectively).

Results:

A total of 144 patients were included: 84% were females; at the last visit of 2019, the mean age was 56.3±10.9 years and the mean disease duration was 18.3±10.2 years; 73.6% were positive for rheumatoid factor (RF), 81.9% for anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies (ACPA) and 45.1% had erosive disease. There were no statistically significant differences in these variables between the monotherapy and the combination therapy groups (table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and disease-related variables in the monotherapy and the combination therapy group.

Monotherapy(n=31)Combination therapy (n=113)Age - mean±SD59.1±14.0 years55.5±9.8 yearsDisease duration - mean±SD20.5±11.2 years17.7±9.7 yearsRF positive - n (%)20 (60.4%)86 (76.8%)ACPA positive - n (%)25 (80.6%)93 (85.3%)Erosive disease - n (%)15 (48.4%)50 (44.6%)

Thirty-one patients (21.5%) were under monotherapy with TNFi and etanercept was the most frequent TNFi in both groups (54.8% vs 50.0%; monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively). At the start of the first bDMARD, the monotherapy group had a higher disease activity score 28 - 4 variables (DAS 28 4V; 6.083±0.930 vs 5.605±1.043, p=0.039) and a higher simple disease activity score (SDAI; 36.12±11.77 vs 28.76±9.98, p=0.035); also, in the monotherapy group more patients had already started the bDMARD in monotherapy (22.6% vs 2.7%, p<0.001), less patients were under (38.7% vs 73.2%, p=0.001) or had already been treated with (77.4% vs 93.8%, p=0.007) methotrexate, in comparison with the combination group therapy.

At the last visit of 2019, the monotherapy group had a higher mean years of duration of iTNF treatment (5.5±5.8 vs 3.4±4.5, p=0.048), a higher mean patient global assessment - visual analogue scale (PGA-VAS; 49±18 vs 39±25, p=0.023), a higher mean prednisolone equivalent dose in mg/day (7.6±6.3 vs 5.6±3.2, p=0.045) and a lower proportion of American College of Rheumatology 50 and 70 responses (ACR 50: 12.9% vs 17.0%, p=0.023; ACR 70: 3.2% vs 10.7%, p=0.045) in comparison with the combination therapy group.

Conclusion:

In line with the literature, our real-life results demonstrate some direct (higher PGA-VAS and lower ACR 50 and 70 responses) and indirect (higher current prednisolone equivalent dose) data that suggest that patients with TNFi monotherapy may have a worst disease activity control in comparison with combination therapy.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0100 VITAMIN D LEVEL IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS STARTING A BIOLOGIC DISEASE-MODIFYING DRUG AND ITS CORRELATION WITH DISEASE ACTIVITY AND RESPONSE TO TREATMENT

Background:

Vitamin D, a fat soluble vitamin that is mainly involved in the regulation of calcium/phosphate metabolism, has a increasingly understood role in immunomodulatory activity, both in innate and adaptive immune system. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), vitamin D showed to suppress the proliferation of synoviocytes and to reduce the production of proinfammatory cytokines, in vitro. (1) Recently the hypothesis has been raised that vitamin D has a negative association with RA activity. (2)

Objectives:

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH) vitD) level, RA activity and response to a first biologic disease-modifying drug (bDMARD).

Methods:

This is a longitudinal, retrospective study including consecutive patients with the diagnosis of RA followed at our rheumatology department. Demographic, clinical, and laboratorial data were collected from our national database at baseline, 6 and 12 months after initiation of a first bDMARD. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0. Correlations between variables were studied using Spearman correlation analysis and comparison between groups was performed using Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Mean age of patients (n=236) was 51.5 ± 11.2 years old, 192 (81.4%) were females with a median disease duration of 10.1 [4.7, 16.7] years. Seropositivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies was present in 192 (81.4%) patients and for rheumatoid factor in 175 (74.2%). The majority exhibited a very high or high disease activity at baseline (median DAS28 5.75 [4.99 – 6.63]) and 90% (n=212) of them were concomitantly using corticosteroids and/or other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (117 with methotrexate (MTX), 62 with leflunomide and 32 with sulfasalazine). Regarding bDMARD, 56.8% (n=134) initiated an TNF alpha inhibitor.

After 6 and 12 months from a bDMARD initiation there was a significant reduction of ESR, CRP levels, TJCs, SJCs and DAS28 (all p-values < 0.001), as expected. Median baseline serum 25(OH) vitD concentrations was 25.5 [16.5, 30.0] ng/ml; notably, 34.2% of our sample was affected by hypovitaminosis D at baseline (25(OH) vitD< 20 ng/mL).

Among our study population 42.5% patients were responders to first bDMARD (23.8% good and 18.7% moderate responders) according to the EULAR response criteria. Disease remission (DAS28 < 2.6) was achieved by 17.6% of patients.

The percentage of good responders was significantly lower in the subgroup of patients with hypovitaminosis D compared to subjects with normal 25(OH) vitamin D levels at baseline (p=0.002), as it was for the percentage of disease remission (p=0.015).

The bivariate correlation analyses showed that 25(OH) vit D levels at baseline correlated with CRP levels and good response to RA treatment after 12 months (Spearman’s coefficient -0.201, p = 0.028; Spearman’s coefficient 0.255, p < 0.019, respectively). 25(OH) vit D levels at baseline, 6 and 12 months after bDMARD initiation did not correlate with age, BMI, ESV, number of tender or swollen joints, DAS28, HAQ or with SDAI or CDAI at 6 or 12 months of treatment.

Conclusion:

In patients with RA, basal 25(OH) vit D levels correlated with response to a bDMARD. These results suggest a role of basal vitamin D status in the prediction of disease evolution and support the hypothesis that vitamin D has an immunomodulatory potential.

References:

[1]Huhtakangas JA, Veijola J, Turunen S et al. 1,25(OH)2D3 and calcipotriol, its hypocalcemic analog, exert a long-lasting anti-infammatory and anti-proliferative effect in synoviocytes cultured from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2017; 173: 13- 22.

[2]Lee YH, Bae SC. Vitamin D level in rheumatoid arthritis and its correlation with the disease activity: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;34(5):827-833. Epub 2016 Apr 6. PMID: 27049238.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0204 AUTOANTIBODIES AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS INDUCED BY ANTI-TUMOUR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA THERAPY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy is commonly used to treat inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Autoantibodies namely antinuclear antibodies (ANA) induced by these treatments are well established. However, anti-TNF-α-induced systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is rarely described and its incidence is yet unknown.

Objectives:

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ANA seroconversion and to characterize the development of SLE induced by anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with RA over time.

Methods:

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted with at least one year of follow-up. Patients with diagnosis of RA, according to American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR), and registered on Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt) who started their first anti-TNFα between 2003 and 2019 were included. Patients with positive ANA (titer ≥100) and/or positive double-strand DNA (dsDNA) antibodies and/or with a diagnosis of SLE at their first visit were excluded. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained by consulting Reuma.pt. As there are no recognized criteria for drug-induced SLE, the diagnosis of SLE induced by anti-TNF-α was considered if there is a temporal relationship between clinical manifestations and anti-TNF-α-therapy, the presence of at least 1 serologic ACR criteria (ANA or anti-dsDNA) and at least 1 nonserologic ACR criteria (arthritis, serositis, hematologic disorder or malar rash) [1]. Continuous variables are presented with mean, standard deviation, median, quartile 1 and quartile 3. Categorical variables are presented with absolute and relative frequencies.

Results:

A total of 211 patients (mean age of 49.9±10.9 years old; 84.4% female) were included with a median follow-up time of 6 [3-14] years. We found a seroconversion rate for ANA of 75.4% (n=159) with median treatment duration of 31 [8.5-70.5] months. The most common titre was 1/100 with diffuse and speckled patterns. ANA seroconversion was higher for etanercept (47.8%, n=76) than with adalimumab (23.9%, n=38), infliximab (13.8%, n=22), golimumab (12.6%, n=20) or certolizumab (1.9%, n=3). SLE induced by anti-TNF-α occurred in two patients (0.9%) with erosive and seropositive (rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies) RA previously treated with two conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate. The first patient, a female with 66 years old and 17 years of disease duration, developed SLE after 16 months of infliximab, with constitutional symptoms, abrupt worsening of polyarthritis, ANA titer of 1/320 diffuse pattern and positive dsDNA (248 UI/mL) antibodies. The second patient, a woman with 43 years old and 11 years of disease duration, developed SLE after 41 months of adalimumab with malar rash and ANA titer of 1/320 diffuse pattern, positive dsDNA (285 UI/mL), positive anti-histone antibodies and hypocomplementemia. In these two cases, anti-TNF-α therapy was stopped and recovery was spontaneous without treatment. The first patient switched to adalimumab and the second switched to golimumab without recurrence of SLE for more than ten years.

Conclusion:

We found a high rate of ANA seroconversion induced by anti-TNFα therapy in patients with RA. However, similar to previous literature, only 0.9% of patients developed SLE with mild manifestations without major organ involvement. Although the drug with the highest ANA seroconversion rate was etanercept, those responsible for induced SLE were infliximab and adalimumab. Patients improved after discontinuation of therapy and tolerated an alternative anti-TNF-α drug without recurrence of induced SLE over time. Therefore, ANA and SLE induced by anti-TNF-α should be considered and reported in the follow-up of RA patients. Further research is needed to explore the impact of this adverse event on the outcomes of treatment over time.

References:

[1]Hochberg MC. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0483 CAN WE PREDICT WHICH PATIENTS WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS WILL NEED DOSE ESCALATION OF SECUKINUMAB TO 300 mg MONTHLY?

Background:

Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-17A, approved in several countries for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis. It is known that some patients benefit from increasing the monthly dose of secukinumab from 150mg, the most commonly used dose, to 300mg. However, the baseline clinical characteristics that differentiate these patients are not yet fully understood.

Objectives:

This study aimed to investigate whether there are any variables at the beginning of biologic therapy that might predict a greater probability of having to increase the dose of secukinumab to 300mg in order to obtain a response to treatment.

Methods:

This is a retrospective cohort study, including all the spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients under secukinumab at our Rheumatology Department and registered in the national database (Reuma.pt).

Demographic, clinical and laboratorial characteristics and disease activity measures were collected from the first visit before the patient began secukinumab. For comparison between the 2 groups, continuous variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and T-tests and categorical variables were analyzed using a Chi-square test. Multivariate regression analyses assessed the impact of selected variables on the need to increase the dose of secukinumab to 300mg.

Results:

Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 53±11.96 years were included, 19 (58%) were females and 16 (48.5%) had psoriasis. Twenty-seven (81.8%) patients were under a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), 11(33.3%) were under corticosteroid and 11(33.3%) were under conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD); 25 (75,8%) had previously been treated with a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD). The mean patient baseline VAS and physician baseline VAS were 74,39±19,77 and 47,55±23,38, respectively; the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) were 26,33±22,62 mm/hr and 10,81±16,88 mg/dL, respectively; the mean swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) were 1,30±1,63 and 3,67±3,14, respectively; the mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) were 6,18±2,06 and 3,41±0,84, respectively; the mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrological Index (BASMI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were 4,22±1,58 and 6,28±2,53, respectively; the mean Maastrich Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) was 2,85±3,23.

Nineteen patients (57.6%) had the dose of secukinumab increased to 300mg. At the baseline visit, the group of patients which had their secukinumab monthly dose increased to 300mg were more frequently men (12 vs 2, p=0.005) and had psoriasis (12 vs 4, p=0.049). On the other hand, these patients also exhibited lower MASES values (2±1.089 VS 4±0.501, p=0.022).

A regression analysis was conducted, estimating the relationships between the outcome binary variable of the monthly dose of secukinumab and the following predictors: gender, psoriasis, MASES value and use of corticosteroid. Female gender (OR 0.070, CI95% 0.005-0.890; p=0.040) and absence of psoriasis (OR 0.104, CI95% 0.011-0.952; p=0.045) were predictors for maintaining secukinumab at a dose of 150mg monthly.

Conclusion:

Our data suggest that the most common characteristics of patients in need of increasing the monthly dose of secukinumab from 150 to 300 mg to achieve a better treatment response are: male gender, coexistence of psoriasis and lower MASES value at baseline. The first two variables remained statistically significant in a multivariate model of regression analysis. Nonetheless, we insist it is of paramount importance to conduct larger studies to confirm these findings.

References:

[1]Deodhar A, et all. Long-term safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 2;21(1):111.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

AB0816 PREDICTORS OF RESPONSE TO THE FIRST BDMARD IN BIOLOGIC-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: A COHORT STUDY

Background:

Several markers of response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have been identified in Rheumatoid Arthritis. However, data on predictors of response in Spondyloarthritis (SpA) are more limited.

Objectives:

To identify predictors of response to bDMARDs in a SpA population.

Methods:

Monocentric retrospective study including all the SpA patients (ASAS classification criteria) followed at our Rheumatology Department, registered in the national database and treated with bDMARD between July 2001 and August 2020. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data at baseline and disease activity measures at 6 and 12 months of bDMARD were collected. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square tests were used to the comparison analysis between groups (continuous and categorical variables, respectively) and univariate logistic regression was used in the prediction analysis.

Results:

A total of 325 patients were included, 178 (54.8%) males, 76 (23.4%) smokers and 164 (50.5%) HLA-B27 positive. Concerning SpA subtypes: 236 (72.6%) had Ankylosing Spondylitis, 31 (9.5%) had Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated SpA and 58 (17.9%) had Undifferentiated SpA. The mean age at the start of the first bDMARD was 41.7 years (±12.2) and the median disease duration was 12.1 years (0.5-52.7). The mean ASDAS-CPR (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein) was 4.0 (±0.8) and most patients (57.2%) exhibited very high disease activity at baseline as evaluated by ASDAS-CRP. Ninety-five (29.2%) patients were taking NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and 131 (40.3%) were under csDMARDs (conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs), being sulfasalazine the most frequent (28.3%). All patients started iTNF (tumor necrosis factor inhibitors): adalimumab (30.2%) and golimumab (24.6%) were the most frequently started bDMARDs.

At 6 and 12 months of bDMARD, 63.5% and 65.7% of the patients had ASDAS response (clinically important improvement or major improvement). Variables that showed statistically significant differences at baseline between those different groups are presented at Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics that showed statistically significant differences at baseline between groups of patients with vs without ASDAS responses at 6 and 12 months of bDMARD. (bDMARD: biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; BMI: body mass index; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate).

ASDAS response at 6 monthsASDAS response at 12 monthsyesnop-valueyesnop-valueAge at start of bDMARD (mean±SD)39.6±12.2 years44.2±10.7 yearsp=0.01240.7±12.8 years44.2±10.9 yearsp=0.035Age at SpA diagnosis (mean±SD)32.2±11.1 years35.8±11.9 yearsp=0.02331.3±10.7 years35.4±11.2 yearsp=0.010BMI (mean±SD)25.7±4.3kg/m228.7±6.0 kg/m2p=0.04525.6±4.3 kg/m228.5±5.7 kg/m2p=0.005CRP (mean±SD)3.2±3.5 mg/dL1.1±1.2 mg/dLp<0.0013.4±3.5 mg/dL1.4±1.6 mg/dLp<0.001ESR (mean±SD)36±2225±20p<0.00138±2427±17p=0.001ASDAS-CRP(mean±SD)4.1±0.83.5±0.4p<0.0014.2±0.83.6±0.8p<0.001HLA-B27+61.5%26%p=0.00660.1%44.4%p=0.033Males62.3%35.7%p=0.00462.3%37.5%p=0.001

Body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.89 [0.80-0.99], 95% CI) and ASDAS-CRP at baseline (OR 2.8 [1.2-6.6], 95% CI) predicted ASDAS response at 6 months; moreover, only BMI (OR 0.91 [0.83-0.99], 95% CI) predicted ASDAS response at 12 months of bDMARD.

Conclusion:

Our results demonstrate that a higher baseline disease activity predicts the response to bDMARDs in SpA. Interestingly, BMI at baseline also predicts ASAS response at 6 and 12 monthes of treatment with bDMARD, in line with some data that suggest an association between BMI and disease activity in SpA.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Vascular depression – regarding a case report

Introduction

Age-related vascular changes have long been documented as an etiopathogenic factor of some geriatric depressive syndromes. More recently, it has emerged the concept of “Vascular Depression” recognizing that cardiovascular disease may predispose, precipitate or perpetuate late life depression. This condition was defined by an episode of major depressive disorder within the preceding 12 months in elderly with cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease, or major cardiovascular risk factors. Vascular Depression isn`t described in DSM-V, and that difficults clinical recognition and affects clinically informed systematic studies.

Objectives

Regarding a clinical case, we enphasize the clinical impact of Vascular Depression`s hypothesis.

Methods

We present a qualitative review of this topic using the Pubmed Central database.

Results

74 years old male patient, with major depressive disorder about ten years. Depressive and cognitive symptoms didn`t respond to antidepressive treatment and his functional state has gradually declined.

Conclusions

Vascular depression develops after the 60 – 65 years in the absence of personal and family history of affective disorder. The key symptoms are low energy, anhedonia, deficits in selfinitiation, psychomotor retardation, reduced processing speed and lack of insight into mood symptoms. Clinical assessment includes a review of history of vascular risk factors or/and disease, but also an imagiological evidence demonstrating subcortical white matter abnormalities. Insidious and chronic course tends to delay its recognition and management. This becomes critical because Vascular Depression is associated with poor response to antidepressant treatment and persistent depressive symptoms. It`s also associated with poor selfmanagement of comorbidities and impairment in daily function. Increased mortality from all causes is widely documented.

Marine litter footprint in the Azores Islands: A climatological perspective

Marine litter (ML) consists of any item of anthropogenic origin that has been lost, discarded or intentionally disposed of into the environment, being acknowledged as a worldwide environmental and ecological threat. In the last decade, there has been an attempt across different sectors to tackle, reduce and mitigate sources of litter. In this study, meso and macrodebris between 2 and 30 cm was recorded and classified in two established study areas (Porto Pim and Conceição beaches), throughout five monitoring years (2012-2018). The litter abundance, density and weighted average by abundance were evaluated in eight main categories: plastics, cloths/fabrics, glass, metals, rubber, processed lumber, other and large. Field surveys provided evidence that plastic represented 95% of all litter. ML abundance was treated as an "environmental variable" and used to determine its anomalies, temporal trends and forecasts. Results from this time-series addressed possible periodic oscillations and density peaks of litter. Reference values of ML presence were obtained and could potentially be used for developing a diagnostic tool for anthropogenic pollution in the Azores.

Preparedness and response in Portuguese emergency plans - Interaction with public health

Background

Articulation between Civil Protection and Public Health authorities is of paramount importance to control, reduce and prevent threats to the health of the population in situations of crisis or catastrophes. National Civil Protection Authority produces Emergency Plans which describe the role of every stakeholder in emergency situations. Role and importance of Public Health and Public Health Authorities is not always present or well described and known amongst stakeholders.

Methods

Data was collected from all Districtal Emergency Plans (n = 18). Each document was analysed considering time frame, refences to Public Health and Health Authorities, definition of roles, communication channels, coordination and inclusion of intersectoral communication flow. Quantitative analysis included absolute and relative frequencies and qualitative analysis to all parts related to the terms “Public Health” and “Health Authority”. Each document was reviewed by 2 independent researchers.

Results

From 18 Districtal Emergency Plans (DEP) analysed, 94,4% (n = 17) had references to Public Health, but none referred the role of Public Health Officers. Only 16,7% referred to Health Authorities, although 94,4% mentioned the law 135/2013, defining the role and attributes of Health Authority. In 72,2%, coordination of Public Health Measures was attributed to the National Medical Emergency Institute. Epidemiological surveillance and Public Health Emergencies were referred in 55,6%, and attributed to the Regional Administration of Health.

Conclusions

Public Health Authorities and Public Health Medical Officers role in articulation with National Civil Protection Authority in emergency situations lacks severely, with this role being replaced by other entities. This is of great concern regarding management and control of diseases, particularly communicable diseases.

Key messages

Public Health Authorities lack the necessary involvement in Emergency Plans and emergency situations. Public health measures are coordinated by other entities rather than Public Health Authorities.