Invasive Fungal Infections After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) affecting transplant recipients are associated with increased mortality and graft dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the frequency, clinical features, and outcomes of IFI (except pneumocystis infection) in kidney transplant recipients.

METHOD

Single-center descriptive study including every kidney transplant recipient with a culture-proven or probable IFI between 2003 and 2013, according to the EORTC-MSG criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 45 IFI. There were 13 cases of invasive candidiasis (C. albicans: 6 and non-C. albicans candidial spp.: 7), 11 cases of pulmonary aspergillosis (A. fumigatus: 9 and A. flavus: 2); 11 cases of subcutaneous mycosis (Alternaria spp.: 9, Paecilomyces spp.: 1, and Pseudallescheria spp.: 1); 7 cases of cryptococcosis; 2 cases of pneumonia by non-Aspergillus molds (Mucor spp.: 1 and Cunninghamella spp.: 1); and 1 case of Geotrichum capitatum pneumonia. All patients were recipients from deceased donors. Six cases occurred in the first 3 months post-transplant, 15 cases between the third and twelfth months, and 21 cases after the twelfth month. Treatment options were fluconazole for Candida infections, voriconazole or caspofungin for aspergillosis, liposomal amphotericin for cryptococcosis, and itraconazole plus excision or cryotherapy for subcutaneous mycosis. Fifteen patients died (33%). Mortality rates were 15% for invasive candidiasis, 45% for aspergillosis, 71% for cryptococcosis, 100% for non-Aspergillus molds and G. capitatum pneumonia, and 0% for subcutaneous mycosis. Six patients who survived (14%) started regular hemodialysis.

CONCLUSION

IFI still have a high mortality and morbidity in kidney transplant recipients, as verified in this report. We reinforce the need for a high index of suspicion and prompt treatment.

Hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and kidney transplant acute rejection and survival

The effect of hepatitis Bs-antigen (AgHBs) and anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positivity on renal transplant outcomes is still controversial. Some studies describe higher rates of acute rejection and allograft loss, and greater mortality in transplant recipients with hepatitis. We retrospectively evaluated data from 2284 allograft recipients who underwent transplantation at our hospital between July 1980 and December 2012. Statistical analysis was made using chi-square and Student t tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and survival analysis. We identified 62 AgHBs+ patients, 99 anti-HCV+ patients, and 14 AgHBs+/anti-HCV+ patients; 2109 patients had "no hepatitis." Mean follow-up time was 7.93 years. No statistical differences were identified on allograft acute rejection rate or patient survival between groups. AgHBs+ patients had, however, an inferior allograft survival, with statistical significance. According to our study, hepatitis B has a harmful impact on allograft survival, although it does not compromise the patient survival.

Pretransplant biopsy in expanded criteria donors: do we really need it?

INTRODUCTION

Renal transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease, including when using expanded criteria donors (ECD) kidneys. However, these suboptimal kidneys should be evaluated rigorously to meet their usefulness. Opinions differ about the best way to evaluate them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed kidneys from ECD harvested by a single academic institution between January 2008 and September 2013. Needle biopsies were performed at the time of the harvest when considered relevant by the transplant team. Two pathologists where responsible for their analysis; the Remuzzi classification has been used in all cases.

RESULTS

We evaluated 560 ECD kidneys. Biopsies were made in 197 (35.2%) organs, 20 of which were considered not usable and 36 good only for double transplantation. Sixty-three kidneys (11.3%) were discarded by the transplant team based on the biopsy result and clinical criteria. Donors who underwent a biopsy were older (P < .001) and had a worse glomerular filtration rate (GFR; P = .001). Comparing donors approved and rejected by the biopsy, the rejected donors were heavier (P = .003) and had a lower GFR (P = .002). Cold ischemia time was longer for the biopsy group (P < .001). Regarding graft function, the biopsy overall score correlated with the transplant outcome in the short and long term. Separately, glomeruli and interstitium scores were correlated with recipient's GFR in the earlier periods (3 months; P = .025 and .037), and the arteries and tubules correlated with GFR in the longer term (at 3 years P = .004 and .010).

CONCLUSION

The decision on the usability of ECD grafts is complex. At our center, we chose a mixed approach based on donor risk. Low-risk ECD do not require biopsy. In more complex situations, especially older donors or those with a lower GFR, prompted a pretransplant biopsy. The biopsy results proved to be useful as they relate to subsequent transplant outcomes, thereby allowing us to exclude grafts whose function would most probably be less than optimal.

New Recipes With Known Ingredients: Combined Therapy of Everolimus and Low-dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Allograft Recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstones of immunosuppressive management in renal allograft recipients even though their nephrotoxicity may contribute to a reduced long-term graft survival. This has created a great interest in improving immunosuppressive strategies in the early post-transplantation period. Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs), such as everolimus, are promising alternatives, although their side effects may have a drawback in de novo renal transplant recipients, for instance, delaying renal function in the presence of renal ischemia/acute tubular necrosis and predisposing to lymphocele development.

STUDY AND METHODS

A retrospective study was developed to compare the combined therapy of low-dose tacrolimus and everolimus (study group) with mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid and standard-dose tacrolimus (control group) in the first 3 months post-transplantation. The study's end-points concerned renal graft function, proteinuria, incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, surgical complication rates, and incidence of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

There was no more delayed graft function in the study group and graft function distribution was similar between groups. Median serum creatinine and eGFR were comparable as well as proteinuria levels. Generally, adverse events were rare in both groups and there were no significant statistical differences between them in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection, surgical complication, and new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation rates.

CONCLUSION

Despite the slightly lower tendency for serum creatinine in the study group, renal allograft function wasn't statistically different between groups. Moreover, there weren't more metabolic or surgical complications in the study group. Everolimus may be a choice in tacrolimus-sparing strategies, but a larger study and a longer follow-up are still required.

Renal transplantation with donors older than 70 years: does age matter?

PURPOSE

The need for organs for renal transplantation has encouraged the use of grafts from increasingly older donors. Studies of transplantation results with donors older than 70 years are sparse. The main purpose of this study is to compare the results of transplantation with donors older and younger than 70 years old.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1233 consecutive deceased-donor renal transplantations performed between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2011. We compared outcomes of grafts from donors older than 70 years (group ≥ 70; n = 82) versus donors younger than 70 years (group < 70; n = 1151).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis of pretransplantation data showed statistically significant differences (P < .05) among the following variables for the group < 70 and group ≥ 70, respectively: recipient age (46 ± 13 versus 61 ± 5 years), donor age (44 ± 16 versus 73 ± 3 years), donor male gender (69.4% versus 47.6%), use of antibody induction immunosuppression (51.7% versus 70.7%), and HLA compatibilities (2.4 versus 2). The group ≥ 70 showed increased postoperative minor complications: bleeding (8.5% versus 3.4%; P = .017), lymphocele formation (3.7% versus 0.5%; P = .011), and incisional hernia (2.4% versus 0.2%; P < .001). Regarding transplantation results, we observed that mean serum creatinine was significantly lower among group < 70, at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after transplantation (P < .05). Cumulative graft survival at 1, 3, and 4 years was 90%, 85%, and 83% in the group < 70 versus 87%, 79%, and 72% in the group ≥ 70. In the subgroup of recipients younger than 60 years, we did not verify statistically significant differences in allograft survival between group ≥ 70 and group < 70. Using Cox regression for survival analysis, we verified that donor age was not an independent risk factor for graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The group of patients who received kidneys from donors younger than 70 years achieved better transplantation outcomes. Nevertheless, kidneys from older donors represent an excellent alternative for older recipients.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation: assessment of risk factors and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complicatin of kidney transplantation (KT) with adverse impacts on graft and patient survivals. This study aims assess potential risk factors for development of NODAT and compare clinical outcomes of KT recipients with versus without NODAT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 648 patients who underwent KT between 2005 and 2009. From the 83 (12.8%) subjects who developed NODAT, we selected 47 for comparison with controls free of diabetes.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of NODAT was made at 4.3 ± 8.5 months after transplantation in 47 patients, including 76.6% males, with an overall mean age of 54.5 ± 10.8 years. Patients with NODAT presented higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose levels (P < .001) as well as cyclosporine and tacrolimus trough levels (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose and higher tacrolimus, but not cyclosporine concentrations were independent predictors of NODAT. No differences were found for other potential risk factors. Upon follow-up at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), 24 hour proteinuria and proportions of patients with hypertension were similar between groups. Patients with NODAT showed comparable numbers of hospitalizations and infections, as well as acute rejection episodes and acute cardiovascular events as their counterparts. Event-free survival (loss of graft function/death with functioning graft) was similar between the groups (P = .418; K-M).

DISCUSSION

In our population, higher pretransplantation fasting plasma glucose levels and higher tacrolimus concentrations were independent predictors of NODAT. During a mean follow-up of 3 years, NODAT was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: to believe or not believe?

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in renal transplantation is associated with chronic graft dysfunction, increased cardiovascular risk, and malignancies. Everolimus (EVR) appears to permit a CNI-sparing regimen among stable kidney recipients.

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of conversion from CNI to EVR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective registry-based study of all kidney transplant recipients converted from CNI to EVR between 2006 and 2010. One hundred fifty-one patients, including 69.5% males and with an overall mean age of 50.2 ± 12.7 years, underwent conversion to EVR at 37.0 ± 49.8 (16) months after transplantation with 33.7% during the first 6 months. Reasons for conversion included: CNI nephrotoxicity prevention (54.3%), chronic graft dysfunction (25.8%), malignant tumors (10.6%), CNI-adverse reactions (6.6%), and biopsy-proven CNI nephrotoxicity (2.6%). During a follow-up of 17.9 ± 9.9 months (range, 6-58.5), 18 patients (11.9%) were reconverted to CNI, 2 died with functioning grafts, and 2 lost kidney function.

RESULTS

We observed a significant (P < .001) increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate-Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFR-MDRD) by 11.3% within 6 months: 56.7 ± 22.1 to 64.1 ± 23.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2). At final evaluation it was 13.7%, namely, to 65.5 ± 23.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2). At the end of follow-up the proportion of patients with >300 mg/d proteinuria increased from 7.9% to 23.3% (P = .001). Dyslipidemia prevalence increased from 69.5% to 77.5% (P = not significant [NS]) and arterial hypertension increased from 49% to 65.9% (P < .001) at the end of follow-up. Other reported side effects included oral ulcers (2.6%), edema (5.3%), interstitial pneumonitis (1.3%), and toxic hepatitis (1.3%), some of them leading to EVR discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In our population, renal function improved significantly after conversion from CNI to EVR. Although side effects were common, most were mild, withdrawal of EVR was necessary in a low percentage of cases. EVR appears to be an effective, safe alternative to CNI for maintenance therapy in selected kidney transplant recipients.

Does multiorgan versus kidney-only cadaveric organ procurement affect graft outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

The majority of kidney grafts in most European countries still come from deceased donors who provide other organs. We analyzed whether multiorgan procurement portends a worse functional outcome compared with kidney-only harvesting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1043 consecutive brain-dead donor kidney transplantations performed at a single academic institution from September 2002 to June 2011. The graft outcomes using kidney-only donors (n = 243) were compared with multiorgan donor grafts (n = 800) analyzing donor age, gender, cause of death, duration of mechanical ventilation, renal function, and cold ischemic interval. We compared delayed graft function and serum creatinine values at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplantation as well as graft survivals. This methodology was also applied to the subset of expanded criteria donors: 179 kidney-only versus 474 multiorgan. The influence of donor variables on graft survival was also analyzed in a Cox regression model. Immunosuppressive regimens and preservation solutions were similar in both groups.

RESULTS

Kidney-only donors were older than their multiorgan counterparts (53.1 versus 44.8, P < .0005) and predominantly male (76.5% versus 62.6% male donors, P < .0005). Other donor variables were comparable. Kidney-only donor grafts showed a slightly higher incidence of delayed function (27.2 versus 21.1%, P = .049), but the mean serum creatinine values were similar at all intervals. No differences were observed in 7-year graft survival: 80.7% versus 79.9%. Expanded criteria donor grafts showed overlapping results, except for a higher rate of donor oligoanuria and a lower 1-month mean creatinine among kidney-only donors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of harvested organs did not influence graft survival.

DISCUSSION

Immediate and long-term outcomes of kidney grafts did not correlate with the number of organs harvested from the donor. The longer explantation time associated with multiorgan procurement did not seem to affect graft function.

Uncommon cause of chest pain in a renal transplantation patient with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a case report

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and, because of its intrinsic systemic involvement, its treatment can be a medical and surgical challenge. This condition is often associated with the presence of hepatic cysts and their prevalence generally increases with age. Most patients remain asymptomatic, but some of these will develop complications associated with enlargement and infection of their cysts. Chest pain is a rare manifestation of these complications and, after exclusion of more common cardiovascular and pulmonary causes, should raise the suspicion of an infected hepatic cyst in these patients. We report the case of a 62-year-old male who underwent a kidney transplantation from a cadaveric donor in 1997 (etiology of the ESRD was ADPKD), and was admitted to the emergency department with complaints of chest pain radiating to both shoulders and the interscapular region. An echocardiogram was showed compression of the right atrium by a large liver cyst without associated ventricular dysfunction. Computer tomography-guided drainage of the cyst was performed and an Enterobacter aerogenes sensitive to carbamapenemes was isolated from respective cultures. The patient presented a favorable clinical outcome with prolonged administration of antibiotic therapy according to the antibiotic susceptibility testing. There was no need for surgical intervention.

Do intraoperative hemodynamic factors of the recipient influence renal graft function?

PURPOSE

To assess the importance of intraoperative management of recipient hemodynamics for immediate versus delayed graft function.

METHODS

The retrospective study of 1966 consecutive renal transplants performed in our department between June 1980 and December 2009 analyzed several perioperative hemodynamic factors: central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) as well as volumes of fluids, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), albumin, and whole blood transfusions. We examined their influence on renal graft function parameters: immediate diuresis, serum creatinine levels, acute rejection, chronic transplant dysfunction, and graft survival.

RESULTS

Mean CVP was 9.23 ± 2.65 mm Hg and its variations showed no impact on graft function. We verified a twofold greater risk of chronic allograft dysfunction among patients with CVP ≥ 11 mm Hg (P < .001). Mean MAP was 93.74 ± 13.6 mm Hg; graft survivals among subjects with MAP ≥ 93 mm Hg were greater than those of patients with MAP < 93 mm Hg (P = .04). On average, 2303.6 ± 957.4 mL of saline solutions were infused during surgery. Patients who received whole blood transfusions (48%) showed a greater incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) (P = .049) and chronic graft dysfunction (P < .001). Patients who received FFP (55.7%), showed a higher incidence of ARE (P < .001). Only 4.6% of patients (n = 91) received human albumin with a lower incidence of ARE (P = .045) and chronic graft dysfunction (P = .024). Logistic binary regression analysis revealed that plasma administration was an independent risk factor for ARE (P < .001) and chronic dysfunction (P = .028). Volume administration (≥ 2500 mL) was also an independent risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction (P = .016). Using Cox regression, we verified volume administration ≥ 2500 mL to be the only independent risk factor for graft failure (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

MAP ≥ 93 mm Hg and perioperative fluid administration <2500 mL were associated with greater graft survival. Albumin infusion seemed to be a protective factor, while CVP ≥ 11 mm Hg, whole blood, and FFP transfusions were associated with higher rates of ARE and chronic graft dysfunction.

C4d deposits in acute "cell-mediated" rejection: a marker for renal prognosis?

BACKGROUND

Accumulation of C4d along peritubular capillaries (PTC) of renal allografts is normally attributed to antibody-mediated rejection. The prognostic implication of these deposits associated with "cell-mediated" rejection on graft survival remains uncertain. Our study aims to evaluate the impact of C4d deposits along PTC of patients with acute cell- mediated rejection on graft function and survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients transplanted between 2005 and 2010 with histopathologic diagnosis of acute rejection (AR). Eleven patients with "pure" antibody-mediated rejection were excluded. The remaining 79 patients were divided into two groups according to type of AR by Banff 2003 criteria: type I (69.6%) versus type II (30.4%). In each group, comparisons were made between C4d-negative (-) and C4d-positive (+) biopsies.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients presented with type I AR: 35 (63.6%) C4d- and 20 (36.4%) C4d+. Twenty-four patients presented with type II AR: 13 (54.2%) C4d- and 11 (45.8%) C4d+. In the type I AR group, graft survival at the first and second years was similar in C4d- and C4d+ patients (94% and 91% versus 75% and 75%, respectively, log-rank P = .26). No differences were encountered in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between subgroups at the first, second, and final years of follow-up. Graft loss occurred in 14.7% of C4d- patients versus 25% in C4d+ patients (P = NS). In the type II AR group, graft survival at the first and second years was similar in C4d- and C4d+ patients (85% and 85% versus 72% and 61%, respectively, log-rank P = .50). No differences were encountered in eGFR between subgroups at the first, second, and final years of follow-up. Graft loss occurred in 30.8% of C4d- patients versus 45.5% in C4d+ patients (P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that detection of C4d staining in acute "cell-mediated" rejection does not imply a worse renal prognosis.

Cytomegalovirus retinitis in an immunocompromised infant: a case report and review of the literature

Purpose

To describe a case of bilateral cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) in an immunocompromised infant.

Methods

A 4-month-old male infant with severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome was examined for the presence of CMVR. Ocular involvement was recorded and monitored by digital imaging.

Results

The child had bilateral CMVR, with a fine granular pattern, present both in the peripheral retina and posterior pole. There was no vitritis. The active areas of retinitis progressively resolved with intravenous ganciclovir treatment. At the 3-month follow-up examination, no recurrence was observed.

Conclusion

Ganciclovir treatment was effective in this case. The prognosis depends on rapid institution of effective antiviral therapy and on a patient's systemic immunocompetence.