26
|
Castelo-Branco L, Lee R, Brandão M, Cortellini A, Freitas A, Garassino M, Geukens T, Grivas P, Halabi S, Oliveira J, Pinato DJ, Ribeiro J, Peters S, Pentheroudakis G, Warner JL, Romano E. Learning lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for real-world evidence research in oncology-shared perspectives from international consortia. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101596. [PMID: 37418836 PMCID: PMC10277850 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
|
27
|
El Zarif T, Nassar AH, Adib E, Fitzgerald BG, Huang J, Mouhieddine TH, Rubinstein PG, Nonato T, McKay RR, Li M, Mittra A, Owen DH, Baiocchi RA, Lorentsen M, Dittus C, Dizman N, Falohun A, Abdel-Wahab N, Diab A, Bankapur A, Reed A, Kim C, Arora A, Shah NJ, El-Am E, Kozaily E, Abdallah W, Al-Hader A, Abu Ghazal B, Saeed A, Drolen C, Lechner MG, Drakaki A, Baena J, Nebhan CA, Haykal T, Morse MA, Cortellini A, Pinato DJ, Dalla Pria A, Hall E, Bakalov V, Bahary N, Rajkumar A, Mangla A, Shah V, Singh P, Aboubakar Nana F, Lopetegui-Lia N, Dima D, Dobbs RW, Funchain P, Saleem R, Woodford R, Long GV, Menzies AM, Genova C, Barletta G, Puri S, Florou V, Idossa D, Saponara M, Queirolo P, Lamberti G, Addeo A, Bersanelli M, Freeman D, Xie W, Reid EG, Chiao EY, Sharon E, Johnson DB, Ramaswami R, Bower M, Emu B, Marron TU, Choueiri TK, Baden LR, Lurain K, Sonpavde GP, Naqash AR. Safety and Activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in People Living With HIV and Cancer: A Real-World Report From the Cancer Therapy Using Checkpoint Inhibitors in People Living With HIV-International (CATCH-IT) Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3712-3723. [PMID: 37192435 PMCID: PMC10351941 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Compared with people living without HIV (PWOH), people living with HIV (PWH) and cancer have traditionally been excluded from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials. Furthermore, there is a paucity of real-world data on the use of ICIs in PWH and cancer. METHODS This retrospective study included PWH treated with anti-PD-1- or anti-PD-L1-based therapies for advanced cancers. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rates (ORRs) were measured per RECIST 1.1 or other tumor-specific criteria, whenever feasible. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare OS and PFS between matched PWH and PWOH with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). RESULTS Among 390 PWH, median age was 58 years, 85% (n = 331) were males, 36% (n = 138) were Black; 70% (n = 274) received anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Most common cancers were NSCLC (28%, n = 111), hepatocellular carcinoma ([HCC]; 11%, n = 44), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; 10%, n = 39). Seventy percent (152/216) had CD4+ T cell counts ≥200 cells/µL, and 94% (179/190) had HIV viral load <400 copies/mL. Twenty percent (79/390) had any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and 7.7% (30/390) had grade ≥3 irAEs. ORRs were 69% (nonmelanoma skin cancer), 31% (NSCLC), 16% (HCC), and 11% (HNSCC). In the matched mNSCLC cohort (61 PWH v 110 PWOH), 20% (12/61) PWH and 22% (24/110) PWOH had irAEs. Adjusted 42-month RMST difference was -0.06 months (95% CI, -5.49 to 5.37; P = .98) for PFS and 2.23 months (95% CI, -4.02 to 8.48; P = .48) for OS. CONCLUSION Among PWH, ICIs demonstrated differential activity across cancer types with no excess toxicity. Safety and activity of ICIs were similar between matched cohorts of PWH and PWOH with mNSCLC.
Collapse
|
28
|
Cortellini A, D'Alessio A, Cleary S, Buti S, Bersanelli M, Bordi P, Tonini G, Vincenzi B, Tucci M, Russo A, Pantano F, Russano M, Stucci LS, Sergi MC, Falconi M, Zarzana MA, Santini D, Spagnolo F, Tanda ET, Rastelli F, Giorgi FC, Pergolesi F, Giusti R, Filetti M, Lo Bianco F, Marchetti P, Botticelli A, Gelibter A, Siringo M, Ferrari M, Marconcini R, Vitale MG, Nicolardi L, Chiari R, Ghidini M, Nigro O, Grossi F, De Tursi M, Di Marino P, Queirolo P, Bracarda S, Macrini S, Inno A, Zoratto F, Veltri E, Spoto C, Vitale MG, Cannita K, Gennari A, Morganstein DL, Mallardo D, Nibid L, Sabarese G, Brunetti L, Perrone G, Ascierto PA, Ficorella C, Pinato DJ. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Efficacy Outcomes from Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2714-2724. [PMID: 37125965 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE No evidence exists as to whether type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) impairs clinical outcome from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In a large cohort of ICI recipients treated at 21 institutions from June 2014 to June 2020, we studied whether patients on glucose-lowering medications (GLM) for T2DM had shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We used targeted transcriptomics in a subset of patients to explore differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of patients with or without diabetes. RESULTS A total of 1,395 patients were included. Primary tumors included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 54.7%), melanoma (24.7%), renal cell (15.0%), and other carcinomas (5.6%). After multivariable analysis, patients on GLM (n = 226, 16.2%) displayed an increased risk of death [HR, 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI),1.07-1.56] and disease progression/death (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43) independent of number of GLM received. We matched 92 metformin-exposed patients with 363 controls and 78 patients on other oral GLM or insulin with 299 control patients. Exposure to metformin, but not other GLM, was associated with an increased risk of death (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16-2.03) and disease progression/death (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72). Patients with T2DM with higher pretreatment glycemia had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.04), while exploratory tumoral transcriptomic profiling in a subset of patients (n = 22) revealed differential regulation of innate and adaptive immune pathways in patients with T2DM. CONCLUSIONS In this study, patients on GLM experienced worse outcomes from immunotherapy, independent of baseline features. Prospective studies are warranted to clarify the relative impact of metformin over a preexisting diagnosis of T2DM in influencing poorer outcomes in this population.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bersanelli M, Verzoni E, Cortellini A, Giusti R, Calvetti L, Ermacora P, Di Napoli M, Catino A, Guadalupi V, Guaitoli G, Scotti V, Mazzoni F, Veccia A, Guglielmini PF, Perrone F, Maruzzo M, Rossi E, Casadei C, Montesarchio V, Grossi F, Rizzo M, Travagliato Liboria MG, Mencoboni M, Zustovich F, Fratino L, Accettura C, Cinieri S, Camerini A, Sorarù M, Zucali PA, Ricciardi S, Russo A, Negrini G, Banzi MC, Lacidogna G, Fornarini G, Laera L, Mucciarini C, Santoni M, Mosillo C, Bonetti A, Longo L, Sartori D, Baldini E, Guida M, Iannopollo M, Bordonaro R, Morelli MF, Tagliaferri P, Spada M, Ceribelli A, Silva RR, Nolè F, Beretta G, Giovanis P, Santini D, Luzi Fedeli S, Nanni O, Maiello E, Labianca R, Pinto C, Clemente A, Tognetto M, De Giorgi U, Pignata S, Di Maio M, Buti S, Giannarelli D. Impact of influenza vaccination on survival of patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (INVIDIa-2): final results of the multicentre, prospective, observational study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 61:102044. [PMID: 37434748 PMCID: PMC10331809 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The prospective multicentre observational INVIDIa-2 study investigated the clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In this secondary analysis of the original trial, we aimed to assess the outcomes of patients to immunotherapy based on vaccine administration. Methods The original study enrolled patients with advanced solid tumours receiving ICI at 82 Italian Oncology Units from Oct 1, 2019, to Jan 31, 2020. The trial's primary endpoint was the time-adjusted incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) until April 30, 2020, the results of which were reported previously. Secondary endpoints (data cut-off Jan 31, 2022) included the outcomes of patients to immunotherapy based on vaccine administration, for which the final results are reported herein. A propensity score matching by age, sex, performance status, primary tumour site, comorbidities, and smoking habits was planned for the present analysis. Only patients with available data for these variables were included. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease-control rate (DCR). Findings The original study population consisted of 1188 evaluable patients. After a propensity score matching, 1004 patients were considered (502 vaccinated and 502 unvaccinated), and 986 of them were evaluable for overall survival (OS). At the median follow-up of 20 months, the influenza vaccination demonstrated a favourable impact on the outcome receiving ICI in terms of median OS [27.0 months (CI 19.5-34.6) in vaccinated vs. 20.9 months (16.6-25.2) in unvaccinated, p = 0.003], median progression-free survival [12.5 months (CI 10.4-14.6) vs. 9.6 months (CI 7.9-11.4), p = 0.049], and disease-control rate (74.7% vs. 66.5%, p = 0.005). The multivariable analyses confirmed the favourable impact of influenza vaccination in terms of OS (HR 0.75, 95% C.I. 0.62-0.92; p = 0.005) and DCR (OR 1.47, 95% C.I. 1.11-1.96; p = 0.007). Interpretation The INVIDIa-2 study results suggest a favourable immunological impact of influenza vaccination on the outcome of cancer patients receiving ICI immunotherapy, further encouraging the vaccine recommendation in this population and supporting translational investigations about the possible synergy between antiviral and antitumour immunity. Funding The Federation of Italian Cooperative Oncology Groups (FICOG), Roche S.p.A., and Seqirus.
Collapse
|
30
|
Pinato DJ, Li X, Mishra-Kalyani P, D’Alessio A, Fulgenzi CA, Scheiner B, Pinter M, Wei G, Schneider J, Rivera DR, Pazdur R, Theoret MR, Casak S, Lemery S, Fashoyin-Aje L, Cortellini A, Pelosof L. Association between antibiotics and adverse oncological outcomes in patients receiving targeted or immune-based therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep 2023; 5:100747. [PMID: 37197442 PMCID: PMC10183666 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with other ICIs or vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors are therapeutic options in unresectable/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether antibiotic (ATB) exposure affects outcome remains unclear. Methods This study retrospectively analysed an FDA database including 4,098 patients receiving ICI (n = 842) either as monotherapy (n = 258) or in combination (n = 584), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (n = 1,968), vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors (n = 480), or placebo (n = 808) as part of nine international clinical trials. Exposure to ATB within 30 days before or after treatment initiation was correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across therapeutic modality before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results Of 4,098 patients with unresectable/metastatic HCC, of which 39% were of hepatitis B aetiology and 21% were of hepatitis C aetiology, 83% were males with a median age of 64 years (range 18-88), a European Collaborative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (60%), and Child-Pugh A class (98%). Overall, ATB exposure (n = 620, 15%) was associated with shorter median PFS (3.6 months in ATB-exposed vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.29; 95% CI 1.22, 1.36) and OS (8.7 months in ATB-exposed vs. 10.6 months; HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.29, 1.43). In IPTW analyses, ATB was associated with shorter PFS in patients treated with ICI (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.34, 1.73), TKI (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.19, 1.39), and placebo (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.11, 1.37). Similar results were observed in IPTW analyses of OS in patients treated with ICI (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.08, 1.38), TKI (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.30, 1.52), and placebo (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.25, 1.57). Conclusions Unlike other malignancies where the detrimental effect of ATB may be more prominent in ICI recipients, ATB is associated with worse outcomes in this study across different therapies for HCC including placebo. Whether ATB is causally linked to worse outcomes through disruption of the gut-liver axis remains to be demonstrated in translational studies. Impact and Implications A growing body of evidence suggests the host microbiome, frequently altered by antibiotic treatment, as an important outcome predictor in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In this study, we analysed the effects of early antibiotic exposure on outcomes in almost 4,100 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated within nine multicentre clinical trials. Interestingly, early exposure to antibiotic treatment was associated with worse outcomes not only in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors but also in those treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and placebo. This is in contrast to data published in other malignancies, where the detrimental effect of antibiotic treatment may be more prominent in immune checkpoint inhibitor recipients, highlighting the uniqueness of hepatocellular carcinoma given the complex interplay between cirrhosis, cancer, risk of infection, and the pleiotropic effect of molecular therapies for this disease.
Collapse
|
31
|
Alessi JV, Elkrief A, Ricciuti B, Wang X, Cortellini A, Vaz VR, Lamberti G, Frias RL, Venkatraman D, Fulgenzi CAM, Pecci F, Recondo G, Di Federico A, Barrichello A, Park H, Nishino M, Hambelton GM, Egger JV, Ladanyi M, Digumarthy S, Johnson BE, Christiani DC, Lin X, Gainor JF, Lin JJ, Pinato DJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Awad MM. Clinicopathologic and Genomic Factors Impacting Efficacy of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:731-743. [PMID: 36775193 PMCID: PMC10500613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy has become a mainstay of first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, factors associated with efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) are not well characterized. METHODS In this multicenter retrospective analysis, clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected from patients with advanced NSCLC (lacking sensitizing genomic alterations in EGFR and ALK) and evaluated with clinical outcomes to first-line CIT. RESULTS Among 1285 patients treated with CIT, a worsening performance status and increasing derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the blood were associated with a significantly reduced objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS). With increasing PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of less than 1%, 1% to 49%, 50% to 89%, and greater than or equal to 90%, there was a progressive improvement in ORR (32.7% versus 37.5% versus 51.6% versus 61.7%, p < 0.001), mPFS (5.0 versus 6.1 versus 6.8 versus 13.0 mo, p < 0.001), and generally mOS (12.9 versus 14.6 versus 34.7 versus 23.1 mo, p = 0.009), respectively. Of 789 NSCLCs with comprehensive genomic data, NSCLCs with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) greater than or equal to the 90th percentile had an improved ORR (53.5% versus 36.4%, p = 0.004), mPFS (10.8 versus 5.5 mo, p < 0.001), and mOS (29.2 versus 13.1 mo, p < 0.001), compared with those with a TMB less than the 90th percentile. In all-comers with nonsquamous NSCLC, the presence of an STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 mutation was associated with significantly worse ORR, mPFS, and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05); this was also observed in the KRAS-mutant subgroup of NSCLCs with co-occurring mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 (all p < 0.05). In KRAS wild-type NSCLC, KEAP1 and SMARCA4 mutations were associated with a significantly shorter mPFS and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05), but STK11 mutation status had no significant impact on mPFS (p = 0.16) or mOS (p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS In advanced NSCLC, better patient performance status, low derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, increasing PD-L1 expression, a very high TMB, and STK11/KEAP1/SMARCA4 wild-type status are associated with improved clinical outcomes to first-line CIT.
Collapse
|
32
|
Chen M, Lu H, Copley SJ, Han Y, Logan A, Viola P, Cortellini A, Pinato DJ, Power D, Aboagye EO. A Novel Radiogenomics Biomarker for Predicting Treatment Response and Pneumotoxicity From Programmed Cell Death Protein or Ligand-1 Inhibition Immunotherapy in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:718-730. [PMID: 36773776 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient selection for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy is currently guided by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression obtained from immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue samples. This approach is susceptible to limitations resulting from the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of cancer cells and the invasiveness of the tissue sampling procedure. To address these challenges, we developed a novel computed tomography (CT) radiomic-based signature for predicting disease response in patients with NSCLC undergoing programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. METHODS This retrospective study comprises a total of 194 patients with suitable CT scans out of 340. Using the radiomic features computed from segmented tumors on a discovery set of 85 contrast-enhanced chest CTs of patients diagnosed with having NSCLC and their CD274 count, RNA expression of the protein-encoding gene for PD-L1, as the response vector, we developed a composite radiomic signature, lung cancer immunotherapy-radiomics prediction vector (LCI-RPV). This was validated in two independent testing cohorts of 66 and 43 patients with NSCLC treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition immunotherapy, respectively. RESULTS LCI-RPV predicted PD-L1 positivity in both NSCLC testing cohorts (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.84 and AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.46-0.94). In one cohort, it also demonstrated good prediction of cases with high PD-L1 expression exceeding key treatment thresholds (>50%: AUC = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.85 and >90%: AUC = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88), the tumor's objective response to treatment at 3 months (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52-0.85), and pneumonitis occurrence (AUC = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.80). LCI-RPV achieved statistically significant stratification of the patients into a high- and low-risk survival group (hazard ratio = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.21-4.24, p = 0.011 and hazard ratio = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.07-5.65, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS A CT radiomics-based signature developed from response vector CD274 can aid in evaluating patients' suitability for PD-1 or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in NSCLC.
Collapse
|
33
|
Anpalakhan S, Huddar P, Behrouzi R, Signori A, Cave J, Comins C, Cortellini A, Addeo A, Escriu C, McKenzie H, Barone G, Murray L, Pinato DJ, Ottensmeier C, Campos S, Muthuramalingam S, Chan S, Gomes F, Banna GL. Immunotherapy-related adverse events in real-world patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer on chemoimmunotherapy: a Spinnaker study sub-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1163768. [PMID: 37324003 PMCID: PMC10265987 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1163768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Spinnaker study evaluated survival outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy in the real world. This sub-analysis assessed the immunotherapy-related adverse effects (irAEs) seen in this cohort, their impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and related clinical factors. Methods The Spinnaker study was a retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in six United Kingdom and one Swiss oncology centres. Data were collected on patient characteristics, survival outcomes, frequency and severity of irAEs, and peripheral immune-inflammatory blood markers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Results A total of 308 patients were included; 132 (43%) experienced any grade irAE, 100 (32%) Grade 1-2, and 49 (16%) Grade 3-4 irAEs. The median OS in patients with any grade irAES was significantly longer (17.5 months [95% CI, 13.4-21.6 months]) than those without (10.1 months [95% CI, 8.3-12.0 months]) (p<0.001), either if Grade 1-2 (p=0.003) or Grade 3-4 irAEs (p=0.042). The median PFS in patients with any grade irAEs was significantly longer (10.1 months [95% CI, 9.0-11.2 months]) than those without (6.1 months [95% CI, 5.2-7.1 months]) (p<0.001), either if Grade 1-2 (p=0.011) or Grade 3-4 irAEs (p=0.036). A higher rate of irAEs of any grade and specifically Grade 1-2 irAEs correlated with NLR <4 (p=0.013 and p=0.018), SII <1,440 (p=0.029 ad p=0.039), response to treatment (p=0.001 and p=0.034), a higher rate of treatment discontinuation (p<0.00001 and p=0.041), and the NHS-Lung prognostic classes (p=0.002 and p=0.008). Conclusions These results confirm survival outcome benefits in patients with irAEs and suggest a higher likelihood of Grade 1-2 irAEs in patients with lower NLR or SII values or according to the NHS-Lung score.
Collapse
|
34
|
Tagliamento M, Gennari A, Lambertini M, Salazar R, Harbeck N, Del Mastro L, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Sharkey R, Dalla Pria A, Plaja A, Jackson A, Handford J, Sita-Lumsden A, Martinez-Vila C, Matas M, Miguel Rodriguez A, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Pedrazzoli P, D'Avanzo F, Biello F, Sinclair A, Lee AJ, Rossi S, Rizzo G, Mirallas O, Pimentel I, Iglesias M, Sanchez de Torre A, Guida A, Berardi R, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Filetti M, Mazzoni F, Mukherjee U, Diamantis N, Parisi A, Aujayeb A, Prat A, Libertini M, Grisanti S, Rossi M, Zoratto F, Generali D, Saura C, Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Pinato DJ, Cortellini A. Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2800-2814. [PMID: 36720089 PMCID: PMC10414724 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice. METHODS We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.
Collapse
|
35
|
Fulgenzi CAM, Scheiner B, Korolewicz J, Stikas CV, Gennari A, Vincenzi B, Openshaw MR, Silletta M, Pinter M, Cortellini A, Scotti L, D’Alessio A, Pinato DJ. Efficacy and safety of frontline systemic therapy for advanced HCC: A network meta-analysis of landmark phase III trials. JHEP Rep 2023; 5:100702. [PMID: 37025943 PMCID: PMC10070142 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Direct comparisons across first-line regimens for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma are not available. We performed a network metanalysis of phase III of trials to compare first-line systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, disease control rate, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Methods After performing a literature review from January 2008 to September 2022, we screened 6,329 studies and reviewed 3,009 studies, leading to identification of 15 phase III trials for analysis. We extracted odds ratios for objective response rate and disease control rate, relative risks for AEs, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for OS and PFS, and used a frequentist network metanalysis, with fixed-effect multivariable meta-regression models to estimate the indirect pooled HRs, odds ratios, relative risks, and corresponding 95% CIs, considering sorafenib as reference. Results Of 10,820 included patients, 10,444 received active treatment and 376 placebo. Sintilimab + IBI350, camrelizumab + rivoceranib, and atezolizumab + bevacizumab provided the greatest reduction in the risk of death compared with sorafenib, with HRs of 0.57 (95% CI 0.43-0.75), 0.62 (95% CI 0.49-0.79), and 0.66 (95% CI 0.52-0.84), respectively. Considering PFS, camrelizumab + rivoceranib and pembrolizumab + lenvatinib were associated with the greatest reduction in the risk of PFS events compared with sorafenib, with HRs of 0.52 (95% CI 0.41-0.65) and 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.77), respectively. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapies carried the lowest risk for all-grade and grade ≥3 AEs. Conclusions The combinations of ICI + anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and double ICIs lead to the greatest OS benefit compared with sorafenib, whereas ICI + kinase inhibitor regimens are associated with greater PFS benefit at the cost of higher toxicity rates. Impact and Implications In the last few years, many different therapies have been studied for patients with primary liver cancer that cannot be treated with surgery. In these cases, anticancer drugs (alone or in combination) are given with the intent to keep the cancer at bay and, ultimately, to prolong survival. Among all the therapies that have been investigated, the combination of immunotherapy (drugs that boost the immune system against the cancer) and anti-angiogenic agents (drugs that act on tumoural vessels) has appeared the best to improve survival. Similarly, the combination of two types of immunotherapies that activate the immune system at different levels has also shown positive results. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO CRD42022366330.
Collapse
|
36
|
Cantini L, Paoloni F, Pecci F, Spagnolo F, Genova C, Tanda ET, Aerts S, Rebuzzi SE, Fornarini G, Zoratto F, Fancelli S, Lupi A, Della Corte CM, Parisi A, Bennati C, Ortega C, Atzori F, Piovano PL, Orciuolo C, De Tursi M, Ghidini M, Botticelli A, Scagnoli S, Belluomini L, Leporati R, Veccia A, Di Giacomo AM, Festino L, Cortinovis D, Acquati M, Filetti M, Giusti R, Tucci M, Sergi MC, Garutti M, Puglisi F, Manglaviti S, Citarella F, Santoni M, Rijavec E, Lo Russo G, Santini D, Addeo A, Antonuzzo L, Indini A, Rocchi MBL, Cortellini A, Grossi F, Ascierto PA, Aerts JGJV, Berardi R. Safety of Extended interval Dosing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: a multicentre cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023:7115841. [PMID: 37042716 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-life spectrum and survival implications of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with extended interval dosing (ED) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unknown. METHODS Characteristics of 812 consecutive solid cancer patients who received at least one cycle of ED monotherapy (pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W or nivolumab 480 mg Q4W) after switching from canonical interval dosing (CD, pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or nivolumab 240 mg Q2W) or upfront were retrieved. Primary objective was to compare irAEs patterns within the same population (before and after switch to ED). irAEs spectrum in patients treated upfront with ED and association between irAEs and overall survival (OS) were also described. RESULTS 550 (68%) patients started ICIs with CD and switched to ED. During CD, 225 pts (41%) developed any grade and 17 (3%) G3/G4 irAEs; after switching to ED, any grade and G3/G4 irAEs were experienced by 155 (36%) and 20 (5%) patients. Switching to ED was associated with a lower probability of any grade irAEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99; p=.047), while no difference for G3/G4 events was noted (aOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 0.81-2.94; p=.18). Among patients who started upfront with ED (n = 232, 32%), 107 (41%) developed any grade and 14 (5%) G3/G4 irAEs during ED. Patients with irAEs during ED had improved OS (aHR: 0.53; 95% CI 0.34-0.82; p=.004 after switching; aHR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.35-0.93; p=.025 upfront). CONCLUSIONS Switching ICI treatment from CD and ED did not increase the incidence of irAEs and represents a safe option also outside clinical trials.
Collapse
|
37
|
Makrakis D, Bakaloudi DR, Talukder R, Lin GI, Diamantopoulos LN, Jindal T, Vather-Wu N, Zakharia Y, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Dawsey S, Gupta S, Lu E, Drakaki A, Liu S, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Fulgenzi CM, Cortellini A, Pinato D, Barata P, Grivas P, Khaki AR, Koshkin VS. Treatment Rechallenge With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:286-294. [PMID: 36481176 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine patient and disease characteristics, toxicity, and clinical outcomes for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who are rechallenged with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort, we included patients treated with ICI for aUC after having prior ICI treatment. Endpoints included the evaluation of radiographic response and disease control rates with first and second ICI courses, outcomes based on whether there was a change in ICI class (anti-PD-1 vs. anti-PD-L1), and assessment of the reasons for ICI discontinuation. RESULTS We identified 25 patients with aUC from 9 institutions who received 2 separate ICI courses. ORR with first ICI and second ICI were 39% and 13%, respectively. Most patients discontinued first ICI due to progression (n = 19) or treatment-related toxicity (n = 4). Thirteen patients received non-ICI treatment between the first and second ICI, and 12 patients changed ICI class (anti-PD-1 vs. anti-PD-L1) at rechallenge. Among 10 patients who changed ICI class, 8 (80%) had progressive disease as best response with second ICI, while among 12 patients re-treated with the same ICI class, only 3 (25%) had progressive disease as best response at the time of rechallenge. With second ICI, most patients discontinued treatment due to progression (n = 18) or patient preference (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS A proportion of patients with aUC rechallenged with ICI-based regimens may achieve disease control, supporting clinical trials in that setting, especially with ICI-based combinations. Future studies are needed to validate our results and should also focus on identifying biomarkers predictive of benefit with ICI rechallenge.
Collapse
|
38
|
Cortellini A, Tabernero J, Mukherjee U, Salazar R, Sureda A, Maluquer C, Ferrante D, Bower M, Sharkey R, Mirallas O, Plaja A, Cucurull M, Mesia R, Dalla Pria A, Newsom-Davis T, Van Hemelrijck M, Sita-Lumsden A, Apthorp E, Vincenzi B, Di Fazio GR, Tonini G, Pantano F, Bertuzzi A, Rossi S, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Pedrazzoli P, Biello F, D'Avanzo F, Lee AJX, Shawe-Taylor M, Rogers L, Murphy C, Cooper L, Andaleeb R, Khalique S, Bawany S, Ahmed S, Carmona-García MC, Fort-Culillas R, Liñan R, Zoratto F, Rizzo G, Perachino M, Doonga K, Gaidano G, Bruna R, Patriarca A, Martinez-Vila C, Pérez Criado I, Giusti R, Mazzoni F, Antonuzzo L, Santoro A, Parisi A, Queirolo P, Aujayeb A, Rimassa L, Diamantis N, Bertulli R, Fulgenzi CAM, D'Alessio A, Ruiz-Camps I, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Garcia Illescas D, Medina I, Fox L, Gennari A, Aguilar-Company J, Pinato DJ, Swallow J, Hanbury G, Chung C, Patel M, Dettorre G, Belessiotis K, Saorise D, Jones E, Apthorp E, Moss C, Russell B, Townsend S, Jackson A, Loizidou A, Piccart M, Pommeret F, Colomba-Blameble E, Prat A, Cruz CA, Reyes R, Segui E, Marco-Hernández J, Viladot M, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R, Henze F, Mahner S, Felip E, Scotti L, Marrari A, Grosso F, Fusco V, Delfanti S, Rossi M, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Chiudinelli L, Franchi M, Libertini M, Provenzano S, Generali D, Grisanti S, Baggi A, Tovazzi V, Ficorella C, Porzio G, Saponara M, Filetti M, Tucci M, Berardi R, Cantini L, Paoloni F, Guida A, Bracarda S, Iglesias M, Sanchez de Torre A, Tagliamento M. SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529)-related COVID-19 sequelae in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer: results from the OnCovid registry. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:335-346. [PMID: 36898391 PMCID: PMC9991062 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00056-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 sequelae can affect about 15% of patients with cancer who survive the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection and can substantially impair their survival and continuity of oncological care. We aimed to investigate whether previous immunisation affects long-term sequelae in the context of evolving variants of concern of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS OnCovid is an active registry that includes patients aged 18 years or older from 37 institutions across Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and a history of solid or haematological malignancy, either active or in remission, followed up from COVID-19 diagnosis until death. We evaluated the prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae in patients who survived COVID-19 and underwent a formal clinical reassessment, categorising infection according to the date of diagnosis as the omicron (B.1.1.529) phase from Dec 15, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022; the alpha (B.1.1.7)-delta (B.1.617.2) phase from Dec 1, 2020, to Dec 14, 2021; and the pre-vaccination phase from Feb 27 to Nov 30, 2020. The prevalence of overall COVID-19 sequelae was compared according to SARS-CoV-2 immunisation status and in relation to post-COVID-19 survival and resumption of systemic anticancer therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974. FINDINGS At the follow-up update on June 20, 2022, 1909 eligible patients, evaluated after a median of 39 days (IQR 24-68) from COVID-19 diagnosis, were included (964 [50·7%] of 1902 patients with sex data were female and 938 [49·3%] were male). Overall, 317 (16·6%; 95% CI 14·8-18·5) of 1909 patients had at least one sequela from COVID-19 at the first oncological reassessment. The prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae was highest in the pre-vaccination phase (191 [19·1%; 95% CI 16·4-22·0] of 1000 patients). The prevalence was similar in the alpha-delta phase (110 [16·8%; 13·8-20·3] of 653 patients, p=0·24), but significantly lower in the omicron phase (16 [6·2%; 3·5-10·2] of 256 patients, p<0·0001). In the alpha-delta phase, 84 (18·3%; 95% CI 14·6-22·7) of 458 unvaccinated patients and three (9·4%; 1·9-27·3) of 32 unvaccinated patients in the omicron phase had sequelae. Patients who received a booster and those who received two vaccine doses had a significantly lower prevalence of overall COVID-19 sequelae than unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients (ten [7·4%; 95% CI 3·5-13·5] of 136 boosted patients, 18 [9·8%; 5·8-15·5] of 183 patients who had two vaccine doses vs 277 [18·5%; 16·5-20·9] of 1489 unvaccinated patients, p=0·0001), respiratory sequelae (six [4·4%; 1·6-9·6], 11 [6·0%; 3·0-10·7] vs 148 [9·9%; 8·4-11·6], p=0·030), and prolonged fatigue (three [2·2%; 0·1-6·4], ten [5·4%; 2·6-10·0] vs 115 [7·7%; 6·3-9·3], p=0·037). INTERPRETATION Unvaccinated patients with cancer remain highly vulnerable to COVID-19 sequelae irrespective of viral strain. This study confirms the role of previous SARS-CoV-2 immunisation as an effective measure to protect patients from COVID-19 sequelae, disruption of therapy, and ensuing mortality. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust.
Collapse
|
39
|
Alaiwi SA, Nassar A, Zarif T, El-Am E, Denu R, Macaron W, Malvar C, Cortellini A, Korolewicz J, Sackstein P, Nana FA, Woodford R, Long GV, Kwan J, Grynberg S, Shapira R, Herrera-Juárez M, Foderaro S, Vasbinder A, Asnani A, Tandon A, Hayek S, Neilan TG, Choueiri T, Naqash AR. CLINICAL FEATURES AND OUTCOMES OF CARDIAC INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER TREATED WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS <ICI>. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)02782-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
40
|
Talbot T, D'Alessio A, Pinter M, Balcar L, Scheiner B, Marron TU, Jun T, Dharmapuri S, Ang C, Saeed A, Hildebrand H, Muzaffar M, Fulgenzi CAM, Amara S, Naqash AR, Gampa A, Pillai A, Wang Y, Khan U, Lee P, Huang Y, Bengsch B, Bettinger D, Mohamed YI, Kaseb A, Pressiani T, Personeni N, Rimassa L, Nishida N, Kudo M, Weinmann A, Galle PR, Muhammed A, Cortellini A, Vogel A, Pinato DJ. Progression patterns and therapeutic sequencing following immune checkpoint inhibition for hepatocellular carcinoma: An international observational study. Liver Int 2023; 43:695-707. [PMID: 36577703 PMCID: PMC10947007 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Different approaches are available after the progression of disease (PD) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including the continuation of ICI, treatment switching to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and cessation of anticancer therapy. We sought to characterise the relationship between radiological patterns of progression and survival post-ICI, also appraising treatment strategies. METHODS We screened 604 HCC patients treated with ICIs, including only those who experienced PD by data cut-off. We evaluated post-progression survival (PPS) according to the treatment strategy at PD and verified its relationship with radiological patterns of progression: intrahepatic growth (IHG), new intrahepatic lesion (NIH), extrahepatic growth (EHG), new extrahepatic lesion (NEH) and new vascular invasion (nVI). RESULTS Of 604 patients, 364 (60.3%) experienced PD during observation. Median PPS was 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.4-6.9; 271 events). At the data cut-off, 165 patients (45%) received no post-progression anticancer therapy; 64 patients (17.6%) continued ICI beyond PD. IHG (HR 1.64 [95% CI: 1.21-2.22]; p = .0013) and nVI (HR 2.15 [95% CI: 1.38-3.35]; p = .0007) were associated with shorter PPS. Multivariate models adjusted for progression patterns, treatment line and albumin-bilirubin grade and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at PD confirmed receipt of ICI beyond PD with (HR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09-0.32; p < .0001) or without subsequent TKI (HR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.26-0.58; p < .0001) as predictors of prolonged PPS versus no anticancer therapy. CONCLUSIONS ICI-TKI sequencing is a consolidated option in advanced HCC. nVI and IHG predict a poorer prognosis. Despite lack of recommendation, the continuation of ICI beyond progression in HCC is adopted clinically: future efforts should appraise which patients benefit from this approach.
Collapse
|
41
|
Alaiwi SA, Nassar A, Zarif T, El-Am E, Denu R, Macaron W, Malvar C, Cortellini A, Korolewicz J, Sackstein P, Nana FA, Woodford R, Long GV, Kwan J, Grynberg S, Shapira R, Herrera-Juárez M, Foderaro S, Vasbinder A, Asnani A, Tandon A, Hayek S, Neilan TG, Choueiri T, Naqash AR. CLINICAL FEATURES AND OUTCOMES OF CARDIAC INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER TREATED WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS <ICI>. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)02797-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
42
|
Fessas P, Scheiner B, D'Alessio A, M Fulgenzi CA, Korolewicz J, Ward C, Tait P, Thomas R, Cortellini A, Sharma R, Pinato DJ. PETAL protocol: a phase Ib study of pembrolizumab after transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol 2023; 19:499-507. [PMID: 37097715 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the treatment of choice for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent data suggest that TACE may boost the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. The authors present the trial protocol for PETAL, a phase Ib study, which will assess the safety and bioactivity of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, following TACE in HCC. After a run-in phase evaluating six patients to establish preliminary safety, up to 26 additional participants will be enrolled. Pembrolizumab will be administered three-times weekly for 1 year or until progression, starting 30-45 days after TACE. The primary objective is to determine safety and the secondary objective is to preliminarily evaluate efficacy. Radiological responses will be evaluated every four cycles. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03397654 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
|
43
|
van de Haar J, Ma X, Ooft SN, van der Helm PW, Hoes LR, Mainardi S, Pinato DJ, Sun K, Salvatore L, Tortora G, Zurlo IV, Leo S, Giampieri R, Berardi R, Gelsomino F, Merz V, Mazzuca F, Antonuzzo L, Rosati G, Stavraka C, Ross P, Rodriquenz MG, Pavarana M, Messina C, Iveson T, Zoratto F, Thomas A, Fenocchio E, Ratti M, Depetris I, Cergnul M, Morelli C, Libertini M, Parisi A, De Tursi M, Zanaletti N, Garrone O, Graham J, Longarini R, Gobba SM, Petrillo A, Tamburini E, La Verde N, Petrelli F, Ricci V, Wessels LFA, Ghidini M, Cortellini A, Voest EE, Valeri N. Codon-specific KRAS mutations predict survival benefit of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. Nat Med 2023; 29:605-614. [PMID: 36864254 PMCID: PMC10033412 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
Genomics has greatly improved how patients with cancer are being treated; however, clinical-grade genomic biomarkers for chemotherapies are currently lacking. Using whole-genome analysis of 37 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with the chemotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), we identified KRAS codon G12 (KRASG12) mutations as a potential biomarker of resistance. Next, we collected real-world data of 960 patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI and validated that KRASG12 mutations were significantly associated with poor survival, also in analyses restricted to the RAS/RAF mutant subgroup. We next analyzed the data of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RECOURSE trial (n = 800 patients) and found that KRASG12 mutations (n = 279) were predictive biomarkers for reduced overall survival (OS) benefit of FTD/TPI versus placebo (unadjusted interaction P = 0.0031, adjusted interaction P = 0.015). For patients with KRASG12 mutations in the RECOURSE trial, OS was not prolonged with FTD/TPI versus placebo (n = 279; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73-1.20; P = 0.85). In contrast, patients with KRASG13 mutant tumors showed significantly improved OS with FTD/TPI versus placebo (n = 60; HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15-0.55; P < 0.001). In isogenic cell lines and patient-derived organoids, KRASG12 mutations were associated with increased resistance to FTD-based genotoxicity. In conclusion, these data show that KRASG12 mutations are biomarkers for reduced OS benefit of FTD/TPI treatment, with potential implications for approximately 28% of patients with mCRC under consideration for treatment with FTD/TPI. Furthermore, our data suggest that genomics-based precision medicine may be possible for a subset of chemotherapies.
Collapse
|
44
|
Perrone F, Favari E, Maglietta G, Verzè M, Pluchino M, Minari R, Sabato R, Mazzaschi G, Ronca A, Rossi A, Cortellini A, Pecci F, Cantini L, Bersanelli M, Quaini F, Tiseo M, Buti S. The role of blood cholesterol quality in patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023:10.1007/s00262-023-03398-3. [PMID: 36828963 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03398-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became the standard of care for several solid tumors. A limited fraction of patients (pts) achieves a long-term benefit. Plasmatic and intracellular cholesterol levels have emerged as promising biomarkers. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), mediated by serum transporters (ABCA1 and ABCG1) and passive diffusion (PD), impacts on clinical outcome of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) pts treated with ICIs. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively enrolled advanced NSCLC and mRCC pts consecutively treated with ICIs between October 2013 and October 2018. CEC and cholesterol loading capacity (CLC) were assessed by well-established specific cell models. As primary endpoint, CEC, PD and CLC were correlated with overall survival (OS) while the effects of these parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit (CB), defined as complete/partial response or stable disease, represented secondary endpoints. RESULTS NSCLC accounted for 94.2% of 70 enrolled cases, and serum sample suitable for CEC and PD determination was available in 68. Blood cholesterol and serum ABCA1, ABCG1, PD and CLC were associated with outcomes (OS, PFS and CB) at univariate analysis. At the multivariate analysis, only PD confirmed its positive prognostic value in terms of OS, PFS and CB. CONCLUSION The favorable impact of cholesterol PD on clinical outcome might reflect its main conformation in mature HDL particles which potentially shape an inflamed context, ultimately promoting ICI efficacy. Further prospective studies are needed to support our findings and uncover targetable pathways.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pinato DJ, Cortellini A. Antibiotic Therapy: The Cornerstone of Iatrogenic Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2023:JCO2300049. [PMID: 36827618 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
|
46
|
Russano M, La Cava G, Cortellini A, Citarella F, Galletti A, Di Fazio GR, Santo V, Brunetti L, Vendittelli A, Fioroni I, Pantano F, Tonini G, Vincenzi B. Immunotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Therapeutic Advances and Biomarkers. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2366-2387. [PMID: 36826142 PMCID: PMC9955173 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer and improved patients' prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have quickly become standard frontline treatment for metastatic non-oncogene addicted disease, either as a single agent or in combination strategies. However, only a few patients have long-term benefits, and most of them do not respond or develop progressive disease during treatment. Thus, the identification of reliable predictive and prognostic biomarkers remains crucial for patient selection and guiding therapeutic choices. In this review, we provide an overview of the current strategies, highlighting the main clinical challenges and novel potential biomarkers.
Collapse
|
47
|
Ghidini M, Hahne JC, Senti C, Tomasello G, Ratti M, Heide T, Garrone O, Cortellini A, Passalacqua R, Valeri N. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) undergoing front-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
175 Background: The potential of monitoring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics to guide clinical decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with I and II line systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) has not been widely tested. Methods: 862 serial plasmas were collected 4-weekly from baseline (BL) until disease progression in 75 mCRC pts undergoing SACT. ctDNA was tested using a custom (RMH GI; 20 genes) or a commercial (Roche Avenio; 77 genes) ctDNA next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. White blood cells were sequenced to rule out clonal hematopoiesis. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on tissue biopsies. ctDNA normalization was defined as ≥99% clearance after 1 month of therapy (Mo1) in the 3 variants with the highest allele frequency in BL ctDNA. Results: 83 paired samples from 75 pts were available for analysis (for 8 pts, I and II line bloods were available). 12 pairs (14.4%) showed no variants in either BL or Mo1. In the remaining 71 comparisons (65 pts), 37 (52.1%) showed ctDNA normalization at Mo1. Among normalized pts there was a higher proportion of cases with a baseline ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1 (97.3% vs 82.4%, p = 0.0362) in comparison to non-normalized pts, whilst no other clinic-pathologic characteristics, including age, sex, prior primary tumor resection, sidedness, RAS/RAF genotype, type of regimen and number of metastatic sites were significantly associated with ctDNA dynamics. Pts with normalized ctDNA had significantly longer overall survival (OS), 45.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.0 - not reached, 14 events) and progression-free survival (PFS), 13.9 months (95%CI: 11.2-18.3; 30 events) compared to non-normalized pts [OS = 22.6 months (95%CI: 16.6-31.2, 24 events) (Log-rank p = 0.01) and PFS = 10.7 months (95%CI: 7.53-13.8; 32 events) (Log-rank p = 0.036) respectively]. In addition, pts with normalized ctDNA had higher overall response rate (ORR) of 72.9% (27/37 responses; 95%CI: 53.0-84.1) compared to 38.2% (13/34 responses; 95%CI: 22.1 – 56.4) in non-normalized pts. In a multivariate model, ctDNA normalization was confirmed as an independent predictor of decreased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95%CI: 0.23-0.96; p = 0.04) and higher probability of achieving an objective response from front-line treatment (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95%CI: 1.08-8.49; p = 0.0351). Only 23/50 (46%) of variants detected in ctDNA were detected by WES in paired tissues in 12 pts for whom liquid/solid biopsy was available. Conclusions: ctDNA monitoring represents an early indicator of benefit from systemic therapy in mCRC pts. A significant fraction of variants detected in ctDNA was not detected in paired tissues.
Collapse
|
48
|
Fulgenzi CA, Korolewicz J, D'Alessio A, Scheiner B, Stikas CV, Gennari A, Cortellini A, Scotti L, Pinato DJJ. Efficacy and safety of frontline systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): A network meta-analysis of landmark phase III trials. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
549 Background: First line systemic therapy for advanced aHCC is rapidly expanding with new treatment options. However, direct comparisons across regimens are not available. We performed a network meta-analysis of phase III of trials to compare first line systemic treatments for aHCC in terms of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and incidence of grade >3 adverse events (AEs). Methods: After performing a literature review from January 2008 to September 2022, we identified 6329 studies for screening, 3009 for revision, leading to identification of 15 phase III trials for the analysis: SHARP, Asia Pacific, Cheng 2013, Johnson 2013, Cainap 2015, REFLECT, CheckMate459, IMbrave150, ORIENT-32, HIMALAYA, COSMIC-312 and Qin 2021, Qin 2022, LEAP-002 and RATIONALE-301. These tested respectively: sorafenib (S) vs placebo (SHARP and Asia Pacific), sunitinib (Sun) vs S, brivanib (Bri) vs S, linifanib (Lin) vs S, lenvatinib (L) vs S, nivolumab (Nivo) vs S, atezolizumab+bevacizumab (A+B) vs S, sintilimab+IBI-305 vs S, durvalumab+tremelimumab (D+T) vs S, atezolizumab+cabozantinib (A+C) vs S, donafenib vs S, camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (C+R) vs S, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (P+L) vs L, and tislelizumab (TS) vs S as first line treatments for aHCC. Relative risks (RR) for grade >3 adverse events (AEs), and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were extracted for each study. A frequentist network meta-analysis, with fixed effect multivariable meta-regression models to estimate the indirect pooled HRs, RRs and corresponding 95%CI, was performed considering S as reference. Results: In total, 10820 patients were included in the analysis, among them, 10444 received active treatment and 376 placebo. Sintilimab plus IBI-350 and A+B provided the greatest reduction in the risk of death compared to S, with a HR of 0.57 (95%CI:0.43-0.75), and 0.58 (95%CI:0.42-0.82), respectively; followed by C+R (HR:0.62; 95%CI:0.49-0-79), P+L (HR:0.77; 95%CI:0.62-0.97) and D+T (HR:0.78; 95%CI:0.66-0.93). Considering PFS, C+R and P+L were associated with the greatest reduction in the risk of PFS events compared to S, with HR of 0.52 (95%CI:0.41-0.65; 0.35-0.77, respectively). When looking at the risk of AEs, the combination of A+C (RR: 1.55;95%CI:0.80-3.02), C+R (RR:1.54;95%CI:0.95-2.50) and P+L (RR:1.23;95%CI:0.72-2.11) were associated with the highest risk of grade >3 AEs; whereas immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) monotherapy (Nivo and TS) had the lowest risk (RR:0.46; 95%CI:0.20-1.05 and RR: 0.74; 95%CI:0.45-1.21). Conclusions: Combination of ICI + anti-VEGF antibodies leads to the greatest OS benefit compared to sorafenib, whereas ICI + kinase inhibitor regimens are associated with greater PFS benefit at the cost of higher toxicity rates.
Collapse
|
49
|
Fulgenzi CA, Murphy C, D'Alessio A, Scheiner B, Pinter M, Cortellini A, Pinato DJJ. Effect of early antibiotic exposure on survival of patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab but not sorafenib for unresectable HCC: A sub-analysis of the phase III IMbrave150 study. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
597 Background: The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) is the standard of care for patients (pts) with unresectable/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Emerging evidence suggest a detrimental role of early antibiotics (ATB) exposure in immunotherapy recipients. However, it is unclear whether ATB affect outcomes of pts receiving A+B. Methods: We conducted a patient-level analysis of subjects receiving either A+B or Sorafenib (Sor) within the IMbrave150 trial to assess the impact of early ATB exposure (ATB+, i.e. +/-30 from treatment initiation) on overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Differences in median (m) OS and mPFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional regression models were used to assess the prognostic impact of ATB+ adjusting for race, age, baseline AFP, baseline ALBI grade, continent of origin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a measure of systemic inflammation. Results: Data of 420 IMbrave150 participants were made available by Vivli. Among them, 278 received A+B and 142 Sor. Most pts were of ECOG performance status 0 (65%); 47% had extrahepatic spread, 40% had macrovascular invasion and 35% had AFP>400 ng/mL. Viral aetiology (39% HBV and 24% HCV) was the most common risk factor for HCC. Overall, 60 pts in the A+B arm (21.5%) and 31 (21.8%) in the Sor group were ATB+. Baseline characteristics were well balanced across ATB groups, except for region of origin, with a higher proportion of Asian pts in ATB+ (60% vs 45%; p=0.01). After a median follow-up of 10.38 months (95%CI:8.6-12.5), OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 72.3% and 9.7% in A+B; 64.8%, and 1.4% in Sor, respectively. ATB+ exposure was associated with increased risk of death both in univariate (HR 1.67; 95%CI 1.04-2.69) and multivariate models (HR 1.62; 95%CI 1.40-1.89) in the A+B (p for interaction <0.001), but not in the Sor arm (univariate HR 0.63; 95%CI 0.32-1.25; multivariate HR 0.70; 95%CI 0.31-1.60). Similarly, the risk of progression was increased for ATB+ pts in the A+B arm (univariate HR 1.68; 95%CI 1.03-2.71; multivariate HR 1.59; 95%CI 1.40-1.81), but not in the Sor arm (univariate HR 0.51;95%CI 0.26-1.01; multivariate HR 0.53; 95%CI 0.21-1.30) with positive p for interaction (p=0.002). Objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v.1.1 did not differ between ATB+ (28.0%) and ATB- (30.0%) in A+B (p=0.68). Conclusions: In a post-hoc sub-analysis of IMbrave150 we demonstrate for the first time the negative impact of early antibiotics exposure on outcomes of patients receiving A+B but not in those treated with Sor. Prospective translational studies should evaluate the role of ATB-mediated gut dysbiosis as a proposed mechanism underlying the adverse outcome in immunotherapy-recipients.
Collapse
|
50
|
Korolewicz J, Scheiner B, Fulgenzi C, D'Alessio A, Cortellini A, Pascual C, Mehan A, Partridge S, Mohammed O, Gupta A, Booker L, Cleator S, Rackie J, Needham Y, Krell J, Tookman L, Park WH, Asif M, Evans J, Pinato D. 96P The Hammersmith score optimises patient selection and predicts for overall survival in early-phase cancer trial participants independent of tumour burden. ESMO Open 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
|