Effectiveness of Preceding Solo Kidney Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes With End-Stage Renal Failure

Preceding solo kidney transplantation for type 1 diabetes with end-stage renal failure is controversial because of less pancreatic graft survival in pancreas transplantation after kidney transplantation (PAK) than in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK).

METHODS

To study the effectiveness of preceding solo kidney transplantation for type 1 diabetes with end-stage renal failure, comparative retrospective analysis was performed between SPK (n = 232) and PAK (n = 39) that were performed until December 2016.

RESULTS

At 1, 3, and 5 years, pancreatic graft survival in SPK was 87.5%, 86.4%, and 82.8%, respectively, and 87.1%, 65.0%, and 49.1%, respectively, in PAK, which showed lesser long-term graft survival than SPK. Because 10 cases out of 16 (62.5%) failed into pancreatic graft loss with rejection in PAK, which was about 3 times more than in SPK, control of rejection is very important; rejection episodes were decreased by rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction resulting in improved graft survival. Five-year patient survival was 88.0% in SPK and 96.6% in PAK.

CONCLUSION

Considering patient survival, preceding solo kidney transplantation for type 1 diabetes with end-stage renal failure should be performed if a donor is available.

Best practices for the management of local-regional recurrent chordoma: a position paper by the Chordoma Global Consensus Group

Chordomas are rare, malignant bone tumors of the skull-base and axial skeleton. Until recently, there was no consensus among experts regarding appropriate clinical management of chordoma, resulting in inconsistent care and suboptimal outcomes for many patients. To address this shortcoming, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the Chordoma Foundation, the global chordoma patient advocacy group, convened a multi-disciplinary group of chordoma specialists to define by consensus evidence-based best practices for the optimal approach to chordoma. In January 2015, the first recommendations of this group were published, covering the management of primary and metastatic chordomas. Additional evidence and further discussion were needed to develop recommendations about the management of local-regional failures. Thus, ESMO and CF convened a second consensus group meeting in November 2015 to address the treatment of locally relapsed chordoma. This meeting involved over 60 specialists from Europe, the United States and Japan with expertise in treatment of patients with chordoma. The consensus achieved during that meeting is the subject of the present publication and complements the recommendations of the first position paper.

Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis: comprehensive guideline of the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japanese Orthopedic Association, Japanese Urological Association, and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology

Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis requires various types of measures, specialists and caregivers. To provide better diagnosis and treatment, a multidisciplinary team approach is required. The members of this multidisciplinary team include doctors of primary cancers, radiologists, pathologists, orthopaedists, radiotherapists, clinical oncologists, palliative caregivers, rehabilitation doctors, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, medical social workers, etc. Medical evidence was extracted from published articles describing meta-analyses or randomised controlled trials concerning patients with bone metastases mainly from 2003 to 2013, and a guideline was developed according to the Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. Multidisciplinary team meetings are helpful in diagnosis and treatment. Clinical benefits such as physical or psychological palliation obtained using the multidisciplinary team approaches are apparent. We established a guideline describing each specialty field, to improve understanding of the different fields among the specialists, who can further provide appropriate treatment, and to improve patients’ outcomes.