Comparison of peribulbar block and general anaesthesia in mechanical vitrectomy: a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Vitrectomy surgery is a common procedure for the treatment of several types of ophthalmologic conditions. It can be performed under regional anaesthesia with peribulbar block (PB) or general anaesthesia (GA). There are no evidence-based recommendations on the optimal anaesthesia strategy for this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the advantages of PB and GA for vitrectomy surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted on adults submitted for mechanical vitrectomy between January 2017 and December 2017. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, namely ASA physical status, median arterial pressure, heart rate, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, times of induction, surgery, recovery, and hospital stay and costs considering medication and material needed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.25, with chi-square, Fisher and Mann-Whitney U tests, according to the type of variables analysed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We included 179 patients submitted for mechanical vitrectomy: 91 (51%) with PB and 88 (49%) under GA. Patients submitted to PB were older (69.0 vs. 64.5 years, p=.006) and presented with higher ASA physical status (p=.001). For haemodynamic outcomes, patients submitted to PB presented with less variation of median arterial pressure (-3.0 vs. -13.5mmHg, p=.000) and with no significant differences in heart rate (-2.0 vs. -3.0 bpm, p=.825). In the postoperative period, the PB group presented with decreased need of postoperative analgesia (0.0 vs. 5.0, p=.026) and a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (1.0 vs. 12.0, p=.001). Times related to anaesthesia and surgery were better in PB group, with shorter induction time (10.0 vs. 11.0min, p=.000), surgery time (56.5 vs. 62.0min, p=.001), recovery time (10.0 vs. 75.5min, p=.000), and hospital stay (2.0 vs. 3.0 days, p=.000). When analysing costs, PB was less expensive than GA (4.65 vs. 12.09 euros, p=.021) CONCLUSION: PB is a reliable and safe alternative to GA for patients undergoing mechanical vitrectomy, permitting good anaesthesia and akinesia conditions during surgery, better haemodynamic stability, and less postoperative complications, especially in older patients and those with more comorbidities.

Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section commonly causes maternal hypotension. This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared methods to prevent hypotension in women receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. We selected randomised controlled trials that compared an intervention to prevent hypotension with another intervention or inactive control by searching MEDLINE and Embase, Web of Science to December 2018. There was no language restriction. Two reviewers extracted data on trial characteristics, methods and outcomes. We assessed risk of bias for individual trials (Cochrane tool) and quality of evidence (GRADE checklist). We assessed 109 trials (8561 women) and 12 different methods that resulted in 30 direct comparisons. Methods ranked by OR (95%CI) from most effective to least effective were: metaraminol 0.11 (0.04-0.26); norepinephrine 0.13 (0.06-0.28); phenylephrine 0.18 (0.11-0.29); leg compression 0.25 (0.14-0.43); ephedrine 0.28 (0.18-0.43); colloid given before induction of anaesthesia 0.38 (0.24-0.61); angiotensin 2, 0.12 (0.02-0.75); colloid given after induction of anaesthesia 0.52 (0.30-0.90); mephentermine 0.09 (0.01-1.30); crystalloid given after induction of anaesthesia 0.78 (0.46-1.31); and crystalloid given before induction of anaesthesia 1.16 (0.76-1.79). Phenylephrine caused maternal bradycardia compared with control, OR (95%CI) 0.23 (0.07-0.79). Ephedrine lowered umbilical artery pH more than phenylephrine, standardised mean difference (95%CI) 0.78 (0.47-1.49). We conclude that vasopressors should be given to healthy women to prevent hypotension during caesarean section with spinal anaesthesia.

Evaluation of the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation on maternal outcomes following elective cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Despite significant improvements in outcomes following non-obstetric surgery with implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, development of these protocols for cesarean delivery is lacking. We evaluated implementation of an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery, specifically the effect on opioid consumption, pain scores and length of stay as well as complications and re-admissions.

METHODS

An ERAS protocol was developed and implemented for women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The protocol construction included specific evidence-based items applicable to peripartum management and these were grouped into the three major phases of patient care: antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum. A before-and-after study design was used to compare maternal outcomes. To account for confounders between groups, a propensity matched scoring analysis was used. The primary outcome was postpartum opioid use in mg-morphine equivalents (MMEQ).

RESULTS

We included 357 (n=196 before; n=161 after) women who underwent elective cesarean delivery. A significant difference in opioid consumption (28.4 ± 24.1 vs 46.1 ± 37.0 MMEQ, P <0.001) and in per-day postoperative opioid consumption (10.9 ± 8.7 vs 15.1 ± 10.3 MMEQ, P <0.001), lower peak pain scores (7 [5-9] vs 8 [7-9], P=0.007) and a shorter hospital length of stay (2.5 ± 0.5 vs 2.9 ± 1.2 days, P <0.001) were found after the introduction of the ERAS protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ERAS protocols for elective cesarean delivery is associated with significant improvements in analgesic and recovery outcomes. These improvements in quality of care suggest ERAS protocols should be considered for elective cesarean delivery.

Prediction of outliers in pain, analgesia requirement, and recovery of function after childbirth: a prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prediction models to identify parturients who experience protracted pain, prolonged opioid use, and delayed self-assessed functional recovery are currently inadequate.

METHODS

For this study, 213 nulliparous women who planned vaginal delivery were enrolled and assessed daily until they completed three outcomes: (1) pain resolution; (2) opioid cessation; and (3) self-assessed functional recovery to predelivery level. The primary composite endpoint, 'pain and opioid-free functional recovery' was the time required to reach all three endpoints. The subjects were divided into two categories (the worst (longest time) 20% and remaining 80%) for reaching the primary composite endpoint, and each individual component. Prediction models for prolonged recovery were constructed using multivariate logistic regression with demographic, obstetric, psychological, and health-related quality of life characteristics as candidate predictors.

RESULTS

Labour induction (vs spontaneous labour onset) predicted the worst 20% for the primary composite endpoint in the final multivariate model. Labour induction and higher postpartum day 1 numerical rating score for pain were predictors for being in the worst 20% for both functional recovery and pain burden. Labour type, delivery type, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety score, RAND 36 Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36) physical health composite score, and postpartum breastfeeding success were predictive of delayed opioid cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Labour induction and elevated numerical rating score for pain are predictive of poor recovery after childbirth. Further research is necessary to determine whether modification would benefit mothers at risk for poor recovery.

Molecular profiling of longitudinally observed small colorectal polyps: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the natural history of colorectal adenomas is limited because these lesions are removed upon detection. The few studies in which small adenomas have been left in situ for a limited period of time, have shown that most lesions remain stable or even completely regress. Specific DNA copy number changes ('cancer associated events' or CAEs) are associated with progression of adenomas to cancer. In this study we evaluated whether molecular features of progression correlated with growth of small polyps.

METHODS

Small (6-9 mm) colorectal precursor lesions detected on CT-colonography (CTC) were left in situ and re-evaluated with CTC after three years. Based on volumetric change, polyps were classified as either grown, stable or regressed. Surveillance CTC was followed by colonoscopy, during which all lesions were resected. Using DNA isolated from FFPE polyp tissues, low-coverage whole genome sequencing was performed to determine DNA copy number profiles, as well as target enrichment mutation analysis and CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP) analysis. Expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins was determined by immunohistochemistry. Samples were marked as MMR proficient if all MMR proteins were expressed.

FINDINGS

Out of 68 polyps resected at colonoscopy, for 65 (96%) material was available. Of these, 31 (48%) had grown, 27 (41%) remained stable and 7 (11%) regressed. Polyps with at least one CAE had higher growth rates compared to polyps without CAEs (difference 91% growth (95% CI 13-169), p = .023). CAEs were absent in lesions that had partially regressed. Mutations occurred in 94% of the polyps, with higher growth rates being associated with polyps having ≥2 mutations compared to lesions with only 0-1 mutations (difference 99% growth (95% CI 9-189), p = .032). All samples were MMR proficient. No relation between growth and CIMP was observed.

INTERPRETATION

Molecular alterations associated with colorectal cancer, correlated with growth of small polyps and were absent in polyps that regressed. Therefore, this longitudinal study provides in vivo support in the human setting for the functional role of these molecular alterations, that have mostly been identified by cross sectional observations in tissue samples of colorectal adenomas and cancers. FUND: Alpe d'Huzes- Dutch Cancer Society (project number NKI2013-6338).

Patient choice compared with no choice of intrathecal morphine dose for caesarean analgesia: a randomized clinical trial

Background

The study aimed to determine whether a patient's choice for their intrathecal morphine (ITM) dose reflects their opioid requirements and pain after caesarean delivery and if giving women a choice of ITM dose would reduce opioid use and improve pain scores compared with women who did not have a choice.

Methods

A total of 120 women undergoing caesarean delivery with spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to a choice of 100 or 200 μg ITM or no choice. The study involved deception, such that all participants were still randomly assigned 100 or 200 μg ITM regardless of choice. Rescue opioid use over the 48-h study period was the primary outcome measure. Pain at rest and movement and side effect (pruritus, nausea, and vomiting) data were collected 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h postoperatively. Data are presented as median [95% confidence interval (CI)].

Results

Women who requested the larger ITM dose required more supplemental opioid [median 0.8 (95% CI 0.4-1.3)] mg morphine equivalents at each assessment interval; P  < 0.001] and reported more pain with movement [median 1.2 (95% CI 0.5-1.9)] verbal numerical rating score of 0-10 points] than patients who requested the smaller ITM dose ( P  = 0.0008), regardless of the ITM dose given. There was no difference in opioid use whether the patient was offered a perceived choice or not.

Conclusions

Women who were given a choice and chose the larger ITM dose correctly anticipated a greater postoperative opioid requirement and more pain compared with women who chose the smaller dose. Simply being offered a choice did not impact opioid use or pain scores after caesarean delivery.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01425762).

Quality of recovery after surgery for cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of quality of recovery is important as an end-point for outcome research. This study aims to determine the incidence and determinants of poor quality of recovery (PQR) after surgery in patients scheduled for curative neoplastic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational prospective study was performed in consecutive patients undergoing surgery for cancer treatment. The Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15) was applied on the day before surgery (T0) and 24h after (T1). PQR was defined for patients with a QoR-15 score lower than the mean QoR-15 score at T1 minus one standard deviation. Preoperative quality of life was assessed with EuroQol-5D. Frailty and disability were defined using Clinical Frailty Scale and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients were enrolled and 31 (15.9%) were identified as having PQR. At T0, patients with PQR presented lower scores on total QoR-15 (P=.03) and had more problems on EuroQol-5D in mobility (P=.014), self-care (P=.027) and usual activities domains (P=.019). The difference of QoR-15 score between T1 and T0 was higher in PQR patients (P<.001). PQR had more frequently Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)≥2 (P=.012) and were more frequently frail (P=.03). PQR patients stayed longer in the hospital (P=.034).

CONCLUSION

PQR patients had lower QoR-15 before surgery, poor quality of life, were more frequently frail and had high cardiac risk factors. PQR patients stayed longer in the hospital.

A Systematic Review of Postoperative Pain Outcome Measurements Utilised in Regional Anesthesia Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Regional anesthesia is a rapidly growing subspecialty. There are few published meta-analyses exploring pain outcome measures utilised in regional anesthesia randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which may be due to heterogeneity in outcomes assessed. This systematic review explores postoperative pain outcomes utilised in regional anesthesia RCTs.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using three databases (Medline, Embase, and CINAHL). Regional anesthesia RCTs with postoperative pain as a primary outcome were included if written in English and published in one of the top 20 impact factor journals between 2005 and 2017. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias.

RESULTS

From the 31 included articles, 15 different outcome measures in total were used to assess postoperative pain. The most commonly (16/31) used outcome measures were verbal numerical grading of pain out of 10, total opioid consumption, and visual analogue scale 10 cm (VAS). The need for analgesia was used as an outcome measure where studies did not use a pain rating score. Ten studies reported pain scores on activity and 27/31 studies utilised ≥2 pain outcomes. Time of measurement of pain score also varied with a total of 51 different time points used in total.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the articles demonstrated heterogeneity and inconsistency in choice of pain outcome and time of measurement within regional anesthesia studies. Identification of these pain outcomes utilised can help to create a definitive list of core outcomes, which may guide future researchers when designing such studies.