Status of clinical research in neurology in Germany-A national survey

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To provide an overview on the status of clinical research in neurology in Germany.

METHODS

German university hospitals, nonuniversity hospitals, and neurological medical practices were surveyed regarding their clinical research activities during the period 2013 to 2017.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of university hospitals, 10.6% of nonuniversity hospitals, and 5.2% of medical practices in Germany responded to our questionnaire. More than 80% of the clinical studies conducted have been phase III/IV and noninterventional trials (NISs), whereas <1% have been phase I and 3.5% investigator-initiated trials (IITs). University hospitals have conducted most of the phase II-IV trials. NISs have been predominantly performed by medical practices. Fifty-six percent of the university hospitals and less of the nonuniversity institutions confirmed the implementation of standard operating procedures (SOPs). In university hospitals, on average, 11 physicians had acquired a good clinical practice certificate. Overall, 43% of all trials have been performed in neuroimmunology.

CONCLUSIONS

The status of clinical research in neurology in Germany is predominated by NISs and late-phase trials, potentially due to a general lack of easily accessible funding, which leads to a highly competitive environment and fewer opportunities to perform early-phase clinical trials as well as IITs. Our results indicate that there is substantial need for structured support for creating and implementing SOPs to maintain quality standards and guarantee uniformity of performance. This survey assessed many aspects of clinical research and serves as guidance for providing ideas for structured improvement of clinical research in neurology in Germany.

Everolimus in adult tuberous sclerosis complex patients with epilepsy: Too late for success? A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

There is evidence that everolimus (EVE) significantly reduces seizure frequency in epilepsy patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Given that TSC-related proliferative processes are more dynamic during brain development, seizure outcomes of patients treated with EVE may be age-related and may be less convincing in adult patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the safety profile of EVE in adults in clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective chart review of TSC subjects with active epilepsy who started EVE in adulthood (≥18 years of age) at seven German epilepsy centers. The primary endpoint was the retention rate after 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 45 subjects with a mean age of 31.6 ± 11.1 years at EVE start fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Retention rate after 6 months was 98% (43/44 evaluable subjects). Response rate (seizure reduction ≥ 50%) was 33% (14/43 evaluable subjects; four completely seizure-free). We did not find a significant relationship between epilepsy outcome parameters and patient age at EVE start. Adverse events were reported in 19 subjects and were judged to be serious in six patients. Three patients died during the observation period.

SIGNIFICANCE

Evidence suggests that EVE is an effective add-on treatment for epilepsy in adult TSC patients, surprisingly without any age limit to individual benefit. A strong age-dependent effect within the period of adulthood seems unlikely. Even if there was no proof of a causal relationship between deaths and EVE intake, patients with EVE should be carefully monitored, especially for infections and stomatitis.

Cenobamate tablets as a treatment for focal-onset seizures in adults

Introduction: Despite the introduction of numerous new antiseizure medications (ASMs) still about one-third of epilepsies remain drug-resistant. Therefore, new compounds with advanced efficacy are urgently needed. Cenobamate (CNB) is a new ASM that has been recently introduced in the United States for the treatment of adults with focal-onset seizures. The approval in Europe is under way.Areas covered: This review covers the pharmacological profile of CNB, the proof-of-concept trial, the two double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trials investigating adjunct CNB in adults with focal-onset seizures, one open-label safety trial, and a variety of published abstract material that provided additional post hoc data.Expert opinion: In two placebo-controlled randomized multicenter phase 2 trials adjunct CNB showed unusually high efficacy with rates of seizure-free people with epilepsy (PWE) partially beyond 20%. However, during the clinical program cases of drug-related reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome) occurred. Therefore, an open-label safety study was performed in more than 1300 PWE with particularly slower titration schedules which did not add more cases with similar reactions. Taking into consideration the promising efficacy and the safety experience from the open-label trial, CNB applied according to the meanwhile recommended titration strategy, might offer a new prospect.

Is the anticonvulsant activity of levetiracetam dose-dependent?

PURPOSE

Although levetiracetam (LEV) is globally established as a leading antiseizure medication (ASM) it is still a controversial matter whether dose increases correspond with an increased efficacy if LEV in the recommended dose range did not show satisfying efficacy. In our clinical perception we questioned the value of dose increases in such non-responders.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocenter study we analyzed the data of adult people with epilepsies (PWE) with focal-onset seizures who had been treated at the department of adults of the Kork Epilepsy Center between 2009 and 2019, who had been on a stable daily LEV dose and in whom LEV was further increased due to further seizures in spite of baseline LEV in a recommended daily dose range. For reasons of data homogeneity, we included only PWE with at least two definite seizures during the hospital stay under the baseline LEV dose who were treated and observed as in-patients after the increase of LEV for a period at least three-fold longer than the baseline interval before. Additional data acquisition comprised clinical data including adverse events, serum concentrations of LEV and other ASMs, and additional laboratory findings. The primary outcome variable was the change of seizure frequency prior to and after the increase of LEV.

RESULTS

Out of 518 PWE who had been on LEV during their hospital stay, a total of 61 PWE fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After a gradual dose increment, 91,8 % of PWE showed a reduced seizure frequency, 73,8 % had a reduction of seizures of 50 % or more, and 21,3 % were seizure-free during the observation period. A significant seizure reduction could be shown with a seizure count of 2,5/week prior to the increment and 0,7/week after dose increment (p < 0,00001). Seven PWE reported minor adverse events and ten PWE showed slight laboratory changes (within normal levels).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to our long-term clinical impression, LEV dose increments were reasonable and improved the seizure situation in PWE, usually without additional safety hazards.

Padsevonil randomized Phase IIa trial in treatment-resistant focal epilepsy: a translational approach

Therapeutic options for patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy represent an important unmet need. Addressing this unmet need was the main factor driving the drug discovery program that led to the synthesis of padsevonil, a first-in-class antiepileptic drug candidate that interacts with two therapeutic targets: synaptic vesicle protein 2 and GABA_A receptors. Two PET imaging studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to identify optimal padsevonil target occupancy corresponding to levels associated with effective antiseizure activity in rodent models. Optimal padsevonil occupancy associated with non-clinical efficacy was translatable to humans for both molecular targets: high (>90%), sustained synaptic vesicle protein 2A occupancy and 10-15% transient GABA_A receptor occupancy. Rational dose selection enabled clinical evaluation of padsevonil in a Phase IIa proof-of-concept trial (NCT02495844), with a single-dose arm (400 mg bid). Adults with highly treatment-resistant epilepsy, who were experiencing ≥4 focal seizures/week, and had failed to respond to ≥4 antiepileptic drugs, were randomized to receive placebo or padsevonil as add-on to their stable regimen. After a 3-week inpatient double-blind period, all patients received padsevonil during an 8-week outpatient open-label period. The primary endpoint was ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency. Of 55 patients randomized, 50 completed the trial (placebo n = 26; padsevonil n = 24). Their median age was 36 years (range 18-60), and they had been living with epilepsy for an average of 25 years. They were experiencing a median of 10 seizures/week and 75% had failed ≥8 antiepileptic drugs. At the end of the inpatient period, 30.8% of patients on padsevonil and 11.1% on placebo were ≥75% responders (odds ratio 4.14; P = 0.067). Reduction in median weekly seizure frequency was 53.7% and 12.5% with padsevonil and placebo, respectively (unadjusted P = 0.026). At the end of the outpatient period, 31.4% were ≥75% responders and reduction in median seizure frequency was 55.2% (all patients). During the inpatient period, 63.0% of patients on placebo and 85.7% on padsevonil reported treatment-emergent adverse events. Overall, 50 (90.9%) patients who received padsevonil reported treatment-emergent adverse events, most frequently somnolence (45.5%), dizziness (43.6%) and headache (25.5%); only one patient discontinued due to a treatment-emergent adverse event. Padsevonil was associated with a favourable safety profile and displayed clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy. The novel translational approach and the innovative proof-of-concept trial design maximized signal detection in a small patient population in a short duration, expediting antiepileptic drug development for the population with the greatest unmet need in epilepsy.

Visual illustration supporting patient-physician communication in epilepsy: A validation and reliability study of seizure images

Seizure manifestations may be difficult to describe in words alone. Thus, initially, 24 seizure images were developed to support communication and gain assistance during obtaining the patient's history. Before being used in clinical practice, these seizure images must be investigated for validity and reliability. We tested the images with untrained participants including patients with epilepsy, persons who had witnessed seizures, and participants who had neither had nor witnessed epileptic seizures. The participants filled in a questionnaire evaluating the images twice within 3 days. The participants were asked to choose one of the 2 written descriptions that best matched each seizure image. The validity was assessed using one-proportion z-test. The reliability was assessed by Gwet's AC1. The first analysis showed that the proportion of correctly identified seizure images was higher than 70%, except for 2 images representing dystonia and myoclonus. The dystonia image was modified, and the myoclonus image was removed. In the final evaluation, the seizure images were identified with an overall correctness ratio of 96%. The final AC1 of the seizure images was classified as very high. The final 23 seizure images are proved to be valid and have a high agreement that can be used in clinical practice.

[Cenobamate-a new perspective for epilepsy treatment]

In spite of the introduction of numerous new antiseizure drugs (ASD) over the last decades, the percentage of drug-resistant epilepsies has remained almost stable. To achieve seizure freedom in such patients with any modified ASD regimen is an exception. Cenobamate (CNB) is a new ASD that showed unusually high efficacy in the pivotal placebo controlled, randomized trials. In both studies (C013 and C017), the rate of seizure-free patients was sometimes more than 20% and thus in a range never reached over the last decades in comparable trials with other new ASDs. This suggests that CNB which is already approved in the USA might actually offer a new and encouraging perspective for epilepsy treatment concerning efficacy. In this review the pharmacological profile, the currently known mode of action, and the results of the clinical trials are summarized.

Alterations of intracerebral connectivity in epilepsy patients with secondary bilateral synchrony

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to evaluate intracerebral network changes in epilepsy patients demonstrating secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS) in EEG by applying a new Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) method using an energy-based global tracking algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

10 MRI negative epilepsy patients demonstrating SBS in 10-20 surface EEG were included. EEG findings were analyzed for irritative zones characterized by focal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) triggering SBS. In addition, DTI including an energy-based global tracking algorithm was applied to analyze fiber tract alterations in irritative zones. To measure the deviation of a certain cortical connection in comparison to healthy controls, normalized differences of fiber tract streamline counts (SC) and their p-values were evaluated in comparison to corresponding fibers of the control group.

RESULTS

In 6 patients the irritative zone initiating SBS was located in the frontal lobe, in 3 patients in the temporal lobe and in 1 patient in the region surrounding the right central sulcus. All patients demonstrated significantly altered SC in brain lobes where the irritative zone triggering SBS was located (p ≤ 0.05). Seven out of 10 patients demonstrated SC alterations in tracts connecting brain lobes between the ipsilateral and the contralateral hemisphere (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that alterations in fiber tracts in irritative zones triggering SBS are not necessarily associated with intracerebral lesions visible in high resolution MRI. Our study gives evidence that diffusion tensor imaging is a promising non-invasive additive tool for intracerebral network analyses even in MRI-negative epilepsy patients.

Adjunctive perampanel and myoclonic and absence seizures: Post hoc analysis of data from study 332 in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy

PURPOSE

This post hoc analysis assessed the effects of adjunctive perampanel on myoclonic and absence seizure outcomes in patients (aged ≥12 years) with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures during the double-blind (up to 8 mg/day) and open-label extension (OLEx; up to 12 mg/day) phases of Study 332.

METHODS

Patients experiencing myoclonic and/or absence seizures during study baseline were included. Assessments for myoclonic and absence seizures included: median percent change in seizure frequency, number of seizure days and seizure-free days (all per 28 days), 50 % and 75 % responder rates, seizure-freedom rates, seizure worsening, and monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

During the double-blind phase, myoclonic and/or absence seizures were reported in 47/163 and 60/163 patients, respectively. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days from study baseline were 52.5% and 24.5% (myoclonic seizures) and 7.6 % and 41.2 % (absence seizures) for placebo and perampanel, respectively; seizure-freedom rates were 13.0 % and 16.7 % (myoclonic seizures) and 12.1 % and 22.2 % (absence seizures), respectively. During the OLEx phase, 46/138 and 52/138 patients experienced myoclonic and/or absence seizures, respectively. Responses during the double-blind phase were maintained during long-term (>104 weeks) adjunctive perampanel treatment. The frequency/type of TEAEs was consistent with the known safety profile of perampanel.

CONCLUSION

In this post hoc analysis, adjunctive perampanel was not associated with any overall worsening of absence seizures. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of adjunctive perampanel in IGE patients with myoclonic and/or absence seizures.

Desynchronization of temporal lobe theta-band activity during effective anterior thalamus deep brain stimulation in epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Bilateral cyclic high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) reduces the seizure count in a subset of patients with epilepsy. Detecting stimulation-induced alterations of pathological brain networks may help to unravel the underlying physiological mechanisms related to effective stimulation delivery and optimize target engagement.

METHODS

We acquired 64-channel electroencephalography during ten ANT-DBS cycles (145 ​Hz, 90 ​μs, 3-5 ​V) of 1-min ON followed by 5-min OFF stimulation to detect changes in cortical activity related to seizure reduction. The study included 14 subjects (three responders, four non-responders, and seven healthy controls). Mixed-model ANOVA tests were used to compare differences in cortical activity between subgroups both ON and OFF stimulation, while investigating frequency-specific effects for the seizure onset zones.

RESULTS

ANT-DBS had a widespread desynchronization effect on cortical theta and alpha band activity in responders, but not in non-responders. Time domain analysis showed that the stimulation induced reduction in theta-band activity was temporally linked to the stimulation period. Moreover, stimulation induced theta-band desynchronization in the temporal lobe channels correlated significantly with the therapeutic response. Responders to ANT-DBS and healthy-controls had an overall lower level of theta-band activity compared to non-responders.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that temporal lobe channel theta-band desynchronization may be a predictive physiological hallmark of therapeutic response to ANT-DBS and may be used to improve the functional precision of this intervention by verifying implantation sites, calibrating stimulation contacts, and possibly identifying treatment responders prior to implantation.

High-frequency electrical stimulation of the anterior thalamic nuclei increases vigilance in epilepsy patients during relaxed and drowsy wakefulness

OBJECTIVE

High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of anterior thalamic nuclei (ANT) reduces the frequency and intensity of focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic epileptic seizures. We investigated the impact of high-frequency ANT-DBS on vigilance in epilepsy patients during relaxed and drowsy wakefulness, to better understand the effects and the mechanisms of action of this intervention in humans.

METHODS

Four patients with different structural epileptic pathologies were included in this retrospective case-cohort study. Short- and long-term electroencephalography (EEG) was used to determine states of relaxed or drowsy wakefulness and the vigilance changes during stimulation-on and stimulation-off intervals.

RESULTS

In relaxed, wakeful patients with eyes closed, the eyelid artifact rate increased acutely and reproducibly during stimulation-on intervals, suggesting an enhanced vigilance. This effect was accompanied by a slight acceleration of the alpha rhythm. In drowsy patients with eyes closed, stimulation generated acutely and reproducibly alpha rhythms, similar to the paradoxical alpha activation during eyes opening. The occurrence of the alpha rhythms reflected an increase in the vigilance of the drowsy subjects during ANT-DBS.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first demonstration that ANT-DBS increases the vigilance of wakeful epilepsy patients. Our results deliver circumstantial evidence that high-frequency ANT-DBS activates thalamocortical connections that promote wakefulness.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel 4 mg/d for the treatment of focal seizures: A pooled post hoc analysis of four randomized, double-blind, phase III studies

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel 4 mg/d received as modal dose, which may have differed from randomized dose, for treatment of focal seizures.

METHODS

Data were pooled from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥12 years) with focal seizures, with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures: studies 304 (NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582), 306 (NCT00700310), and 335 (NCT01618695). Efficacy assessments included median percentage reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days and seizure-freedom rates for patients receiving placebo and perampanel 4 mg/d (modal dose). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed in patients receiving perampanel 4 mg/d at their TEAE onset. Outcomes were also assessed with/without enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs).

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 979 patients with focal seizures (placebo: n = 616 [235 with FBTC seizures]; perampanel 4 mg/d: n = 363 [134 with FBTC seizures]). Compared with placebo, perampanel 4 mg/d conferred significantly greater median percentage reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for focal (12.6% vs 21.1%; P = .0004) and FBTC seizures (17.4% vs 49.8%; P < .0001), and seizure-freedom rates for focal (0.8% vs 3.6%; P = .0018) and FBTC seizures (11.1% vs 18.7%; P = .0424). Seizure improvements with perampanel 4 mg/d were greater without EIASMs than with EIASMs. For assessment of TEAEs, overall 1376 patients with focal seizures received perampanel 4 mg/d at any time (FBTC seizures, n = 499). TEAEs with perampanel 4 mg/d occurred in 419 of 1376 (30.5%) and 148 of 499 (29.7%) patients with focal and FBTC seizures, respectively; most common was dizziness. The proportion of TEAEs was similar with or without EIASMs.

SIGNIFICANCE

This post hoc analysis showed adjunctive perampanel 4 mg/d was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with focal seizures, with or without FBTC seizures. This dose may be a valuable treatment option in patients unable to tolerate higher perampanel doses up to 12 mg/d.

Safety and efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate (YKP3089) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial

BACKGROUND

More than a third of patients with epilepsy are treatment resistant, and thus new, more effective therapies to achieve seizure freedom are needed. Cenobamate (YKP3089), an investigational antiepileptic drug, has shown broad-spectrum anticonvulsant activity in preclinical studies and seizure models. We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in patients with uncontrolled focal (partial)-onset epilepsy.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response study at 107 epilepsy and neurology centres in 16 countries. Adult patients (aged 18-70 years) with focal seizures despite treatment with 1-3 antiepileptic drugs were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) via an interactive web response system, by block sizes of 4 within each country, to adjuvant once daily oral cenobamate at dose groups of 100 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg, or placebo following an 8-week baseline assessment. Patients, investigators, and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The study included a 6-week titration phase and 12-week maintenance phase. The primary efficacy outcomes were percentage change in 28-day focal seizure frequency (focal aware motor, focal impaired awareness, or focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) from baseline analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (≥1 dose and any post-baseline seizure data) and responder rates (≥50% reduction) analysed in the maintenance phase population (≥1 dose in the maintenance phase and any maintenance phase seizure data). The primary efficacy outcomes were analysed using a hierarchal step-down procedure comparing 200 mg versus placebo, 400 mg versus placebo, then 100 mg versus placebo. Safety and tolerability were compared descriptively across treatment groups for all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01866111.

FINDINGS

Between July 31, 2013, and June 22, 2015, 437 patients were randomly assigned to either placebo (n=108) or cenobamate 100 mg (n=108), 200 mg (n=110), or 400 mg (n=111). Of these patients, 434 (106 [98%] in placebo group, 108 [100%] in 100 mg group, 109 [99%] in 200 mg group, and 111 [100%] in 400 mg group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, and 397 (102 [94%] in placebo group, 102 [94%] in 100 mg group, 98 [89%] in 200 mg group, and 95 [86%] in 400 mg group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat maintenance phase population. Median percentage changes in seizure frequency were -24·0% (IQR -45·0 to -7·0%) for the placebo group compared with -35·5% (-62·5 to -15·0%; p=0·0071) for the 100 mg dose group, -55·0% (-73·0 to -23·0%; p<0·0001) for the 200 mg dose group, and -55·0% (-85·0 to -28·0%; p<0·0001) for the 400 mg dose group. Responder rates during the maintenance phase were 25% (26 of 102 patients) for the placebo group compared with 40% (41 of 102; odds ratio 1·97, 95% CI 1·08-3·56; p=0·0365) for the 100 mg dose group, 56% (55 of 98; 3·74, 2·06-6·80; p<0·0001) for the 200 mg dose group, and 64% (61 of 95; 5·24, 2·84-9·67; p<0·0001) for the 400 mg dose group. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 76 (70%) of 108 patients in the placebo group, 70 (65%) of 108 in the 100 mg group, 84 (76%) of 110 in the 200 mg group, and 100 (90%) of 111 in the 400 mg group. Treatment-emergent adverse events led to discontinuation in five (5%) patients in the placebo group, 11 (10%) in the 100 mg dose group, 15 (14%) in the 200 mg dose group, and 22 (20%) in the 400 mg dose group. One serious case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms occurred in the 200 mg cenobamate group. No deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Adjunctive cenobamate reduced focal (partial)-onset seizure frequency, in a dose-related fashion. Treatment-emergent adverse events were most frequent in the highest dose group. Cenobamate appears to be an effective treatment option in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.

FUNDING

SK Life Science.

Levetiracetam and brivaracetam: a review of evidence from clinical trials and clinical experience

Until the early 1990s, a limited number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were available. Since then, a large variety of new AEDs have been developed and introduced, several of them offering new modes of action. One of these new AED families is described and reviewed in this article. Levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV) are pyrrolidone derivate compounds binding at the presynaptic SV2A receptor site and are thus representative of AEDs with a unique mode of action. LEV was extensively investigated in randomized controlled trials and has a very promising efficacy both in focal and generalized epilepsies. Its pharmacokinetic profile is favorable and LEV does not undergo clinically relevant interactions. Adverse reactions comprise mainly asthenia, somnolence, and behavioral symptoms. It has now been established as a first-line antiepileptic drug. BRV has been recently introduced as an adjunct antiepileptic drug in focal epilepsy with a similarly promising pharmacokinetic profile and possibly increased tolerability concerning psychiatric adverse events. This review summarizes the essential preclinical and clinical data of LEV and BRV that is currently available and includes the experiences at a large tertiary referral epilepsy center.

Ultra-Rare Genetic Variation in the Epilepsies: A Whole-Exome Sequencing Study of 17,606 Individuals

Sequencing-based studies have identified novel risk genes associated with severe epilepsies and revealed an excess of rare deleterious variation in less-severe forms of epilepsy. To identify the shared and distinct ultra-rare genetic risk factors for different types of epilepsies, we performed a whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis of 9,170 epilepsy-affected individuals and 8,436 controls of European ancestry. We focused on three phenotypic groups: severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs), genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), and non-acquired focal epilepsy (NAFE). We observed that compared to controls, individuals with any type of epilepsy carried an excess of ultra-rare, deleterious variants in constrained genes and in genes previously associated with epilepsy; we saw the strongest enrichment in individuals with DEEs and the least strong in individuals with NAFE. Moreover, we found that inhibitory GABA_A receptor genes were enriched for missense variants across all three classes of epilepsy, whereas no enrichment was seen in excitatory receptor genes. The larger gene groups for the GABAergic pathway or cation channels also showed a significant mutational burden in DEEs and GGE. Although no single gene surpassed exome-wide significance among individuals with GGE or NAFE, highly constrained genes and genes encoding ion channels were among the lead associations; such genes included CACNA1G, EEF1A2, and GABRG2 for GGE and LGI1, TRIM3, and GABRG2 for NAFE. Our study, the largest epilepsy WES study to date, confirms a convergence in the genetics of severe and less-severe epilepsies associated with ultra-rare coding variation, and it highlights a ubiquitous role for GABAergic inhibition in epilepsy etiology.

Is there a place for surgical treatment of nonpharmacoresistant epilepsy?

Epilepsy surgery has been shown to be the best possible treatment in well-defined and difficult-to-treat epilepsy syndromes, such as mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis, even early in the course of the disease if pharmacoresistance is proven. This review addresses the question if epilepsy surgery may be justified today even in nonpharmacoresistant cases. There are two possible groups of patients: first, there are epilepsy syndromes with a benign spontaneous course or with a potentially good treatment prognosis under appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. Second, there are epilepsies with potentially worse AED treatment prognosis in which appropriate AED treatment has not yet been applied because of the short course of the disease, tolerability problems that prevented usually effective dosing, or adherence issues. In group one, the good spontaneous prognosis or the usually satisfying course under AED treatment in line with the commonly generalized underlying epileptogenesis does not suggest that epilepsy surgery is a realistic alternative, not even in cases with distinct focal clinical and/or electroencephalography (EEG) patterns like in Rolandic epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. In the second group, the recent International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition should allow assessment of individual pharmacoresistance early after the onset of the disease in order to avoid any delay. Concerns about a potential disease-specific or drug-specific cognitive decline that could be avoided in early surgery are speculative, a matter of controversial discussion, and certainly not relevant, if pharmacoresistance is consequently addressed in time according to the ILAE recommendations. One should also not forget that even in typically pharmacoresistant epilepsy syndromes that are suitable for surgical procedures, satisfying courses do exist that would not require early or any epilepsy surgery. Therefore, in almost any instance, epilepsy surgery as initial treatment or immediately after a first AED is still not recommended although, especially in cases with nonadherence to AEDs, it may be occasionally considered in order to outweigh the risks of ongoing seizures and epilepsy if surgery is not performed.

Efficacy, Retention, and Tolerability of Brivaracetam in Patients With Epileptic Encephalopathies: A Multicenter Cohort Study From Germany

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in a severely drug refractory cohort of patients with epileptic encephalopathies (EE).

Method: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients treated with EE who began treatment with BRV in an enrolling epilepsy center between 2016 and 2017.

Results: Forty-four patients (27 male [61%], mean age 29 years, range 6 to 62) were treated with BRV. The retention rate was 65% at 3 months, 52% at 6 months and 41% at 12 months. A mean retention time of 5 months resulted in a cumulative exposure to BRV of 310 months. Three patients were seizure free during the baseline. At 3 months, 20 (45%, 20/44 as per intention-to-treat analysis considering all patients that started BRV including three who were seizure free during baseline) were either seizure free (n = 4; 9%, three of them already seizure-free at baseline) or reported at least 25% (n = 4; 9%) or 50% (n = 12; 27%) reduction in seizures. An increase in seizure frequency was reported in two (5%) patients, while there was no change in the seizure frequency of the other patients. A 50% long-term responder rate was apparent in 19 patients (43%), with two (5%) free from seizures for more than six months and in nine patients (20%, with one [2 %] free from seizures) for more than 12 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events were predominantly of psychobehavioural nature and were observed in 16%.

Significance: In this retrospective analysis the rate of patients with a 50% seizure reduction under BRV proofed to be similar to those seen in regulatory trials for focal epilepsies. BRV appears to be safe and relatively well tolerated in EE and might be considered in patients with psychobehavioral adverse events while on levetiracetam.

Use of brivaracetam in genetic generalized epilepsies and for acute, intravenous treatment of absence status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness, retention, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE) in clinical practice.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients that started BRV in 2016 and 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients (mean age = 29.8, range = 9-90 years, 41 female [67%]) were treated with BRV. They were difficult to control, with 2.4 failed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the past, taking 1.9 AEDs on average at baseline. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 7 days to 24 months, with a mean retention time of 7.9 months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 483 months. The retention rate was 82% at 3 months and 69% at 6 months. Efficacy at 3 months was 36% (50% responder rate), with 25% seizure-free for 3 months. Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy showed a responder rate of 60%, with 40% being free of any seizures. Long-term 50% responder rate was present in 17 patients (28%; 11 seizure-free [18%]) for >6 months and in 14 patients (23%; 10 seizure-free [16%]) for >12 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 26% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, ataxia, and psychobehavioral adverse events. Use of intravenous BRV with bolus injection of 200-300 mg in two females with absence status epilepticus was well tolerated, but did not result in cessation of status epilepticus.

SIGNIFICANCE

Use of BRV in GGE is well tolerated, and 50% responder rates are similar to those observed in the regulatory trials for focal epilepsies. An immediate switch from levetiracetam (LEV) to BRV at a ratio of 15:1 is feasible. The occurrence of psychobehavioral adverse events seems less prominent than under LEV, and a switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV-induced adverse events.

European trends in epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

Resective surgery is effective in treating drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but it remains unclear whether improved diagnostics influence postsurgical outcomes. Here, we compared practice and outcomes over 2 periods 15 years apart.

METHODS

Sixteen European centers retrospectively identified 2 cohorts of children and adults who underwent epilepsy surgery in the period of 1997 to 1998 (n = 562) or 2012 to 2013 (n = 736). Data collected included patient (sex, age) and disease (duration, localization and diagnosis) characteristics, type of surgery, histopathology, Engel postsurgical outcome, and complications, as well as imaging and electrophysiologic tests performed for each case. Postsurgical outcome predictors were included in a multivariate logistic regression to assess the strength of date of surgery as an independent predictor.

RESULTS

Over time, the number of operated cases per center increased from a median of 31 to 50 per 2-year period (p = 0.02). Mean disease duration at surgery decreased by 5.2 years (p < 0.001). Overall seizure freedom (Engel class 1) increased from 66.7% to 70.9% (adjusted p = 0.04), despite an increase in complex surgeries (extratemporal and/or MRI negative). Surgeries performed during the later period were 1.34 times (adjusted odds ratio; 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.77) more likely to yield a favorable outcome (Engel class I) than earlier surgeries, and improvement was more marked in extratemporal and MRI-negative temporal epilepsy. The rate of persistent neurologic complications remained stable (4.6%-5.3%, p = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

Improvements in European epilepsy surgery over time are modest but significant, including higher surgical volume, shorter disease duration, and improved postsurgical seizure outcomes. Early referral for evaluation is required to continue on this encouraging trend.

Characteristics and healthcare situation of adult patients with tuberous sclerosis complex in German epilepsy centers

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to collect systematic data on the care of adult patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in German epilepsy centers, to describe the characteristics of patients in this age group, and to clarify whether and how the recommended interdisciplinary care is implemented.

METHODS

This retrospective survey involved 12 major epilepsy centers in Germany. Aggregated data were collected based on an electronic questionnaire that addressed the sociodemographic data, characteristics of the epilepsy syndromes, and general healthcare setting of adult patients with TSC.

RESULTS

The survey included 262 patients (mean age: 36.2±9.0years) with TSC, most of whom were reported to live in either a home for persons with a disability (37.0%), a residential care home (6.9%), or with their parents (31.1%). A further 13.0% were self-sustaining, and 8.8% were living with a partner. Most patients presented with focal (49.6%) or multifocal (33.2%) epilepsy, with complex partial, dialeptic, and automotor seizures in 66% of patients and generalized tonic-clonic seizures in 63%. Drug-refractory epilepsy was seen in 78.2% of patients, and 17.6% were seizure-free at the time of the survey. Of the 262 patients, presurgical diagnostics were performed in 27% and epilepsy surgery in 9%, which rendered 50% of these patients seizure-free. Renal screening had been performed in 56.1% within the last three years and was scheduled to be performed in 58.0%. Cases of renal angiomyolipoma were present in 46.9% of the patients. Dermatologic and pulmonary screenings were known to be planned for only few patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite TSC being a multisystem disorder causing considerable impairment, every fifth adult patient is self-sustaining or living with a partner. In clinical practice, uncontrolled epilepsy and renal angiomyolipoma are of major importance in adult patients with TSC. Most patients suffer from focal or multifocal epilepsy, but epilepsy surgery is performed in less than 10% of these patients. Interdisciplinary TSC centers may help to optimize the management of patients with TSC regardless of age and ensure early and adequate treatment that also considers the advances in new therapeutic options.