Comparison of the LCx human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA quantitative, RealTime HIV, and COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan assays for quantitation of HIV type 1 RNA in plasma

The LCx human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA Quantitative, RealTime HIV, and COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan assays for HIV type 1 (HIV-1) were compared for their abilities to quantitate HIV-1 RNA in plasma. High degrees of correlation and agreement were observed between the assays. Differences in HIV-1 RNA levels according to HIV-1 subtypes did not reach statistical significance.

CXCR4 overexpression during the course of HIV-1 infection correlates with the emergence of X4 strains

The factors that determine the emergence of X4 isolates in some HIV-1-infected subjects are unknown. As the level of expression of CXCR4 could favor an R5 to X4 switch, quantitative flow cytometry was used to measure CXCR4 density on CD4 T cells in 200 HIV-1-positive adults, and this was compared with CD4 counts, interleukin-7 (IL-7), and RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted) plasma levels and the R5/X4 virus phenotype. CD4 T-cell surface CXCR4 densities were increased in infected subjects and inversely correlated with CD4 T-cell count (r=-0.548, P<0.001). Yet, in vitro infection with either R5 or X4 strains and in vivo increases in viral load following interruption of antiretroviral treatment did not induce CXCR4 overexpression. The plasma levels of IL-7 and RANTES, 2 cytokines able to induce CXCR4 expression, did not correlate with CXCR4 density. Finally, higher CXCR4 densities were observed in patients harboring X4 strains (3300, 95% CI 2431-4169 CXCR4 molecules per cell) than in patients harboring only R5 strains (2406, 95% CI 2135-2677, P=0.027). These data suggest that CXCR4 overexpression during the course of the disease in some patients could favor the emergence of X4 strains.

Comparison of Drug Resistance Mutations and Their Interpretation in Patients Infected With Non-B HIV-1 Variants and Matched Patients Infected With HIV-1 Subtype B

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs and their interpretation in patients infected with non-B HIV-1 variants versus HIV-1subtype B-infected patients with similar treatment regimens.

METHODS

The reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes of HIV-1 were sequenced, and subtypes were determined by phylogenetic analysis. Each sequence belonging to a non-B variant was matched with a sequence belonging to subtype B. Patterns of resistance mutations were interpreted in terms of drug resistance using the HIV db algorithm.

RESULTS

RT mutations M41L, L210W, and, to a lesser extent, T215Y were less prevalent in patients infected with non-B variants. This lower prevalence was associated with subtypes A (A1/A2), C, F (F1/F2), and CRF06_cpx. A lower prevalence of high-level resistance to zidovudine was also observed in patients infected with these HIV-1 variants. In the protease gene, differences between patients infected with B or non-B strains were mainly observed for mutations playing a minor role in drug resistance and known to occur mainly as a natural polymorphism in non-B strains: K20R/M/I, M36I, L63P, A71V/T, and V77I. Interpretation of genotypes using the HIV db algorithm indicated that resistance to saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, and amprenavir was more frequently a high-level resistance for subtype B and an intermediate-level resistance for non-B variants, but this difference was only significant for amprenavir.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the genetic diversity of HIV-1 does not play a major role in the development of resistance to antiretroviral drugs.

Prevalence of the mutational pattern E44D/A and/or V118I in the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene of HIV-1 in relation to treatment with nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors

It has been reported that a new pattern of mutations, E44D/A and/or V118I, in the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene of HIV-1 confers a moderate level of resistance to lamivudine in the absence of the M184V mutation. The prevalence of this mutational pattern was studied in HIV-1 isolates obtained from 280 patients. These mutations were not identified in the RT sequences from 23 antiretroviral-naive patients but were detected in 82 (31.9%) of the 257 RT sequences obtained from nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)-experienced patients. Mutation at codon 44 was identified in 41 patients (7 mutations E44A and 34 mutations E44D), mutation V118I was identified in 73 patients and a combination of mutations at codons 44 and 118 was found in 32 patients. Multivariate analysis showed an association between the E44D/A and/or V118I mutational pattern and the RT mutations D67N, T69D, L210W, and T215Y/F. No relationship was observed between this mutational pattern and the lamivudine-specific resistance mutation M184V. The prevalence of these mutations increased significantly with the number of drug regimens experienced and a prevalence of 42.4% was observed in patients who had received >or= 4 antiretroviral regimens. A relationship was found between the E44D/A and/or V118I mutational pattern and experience with didanosine or stavudine but not with lamivudine. The results suggest that the development of the E44D/A and/or V118I mutational pattern is frequent in patients treated with NRTIs. Thymidine analogues and didanosine, but not lamivudine, could promote the development of these mutations.

Patterns of resistance mutations to antiretroviral drugs in extensively treated HIV-1-infected patients with failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Resistance-mutation patterns in the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes of HIV-1 were analyzed in 22 patients who had been extensively pretreated and who failed to respond to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The number of mutations ranged from 8 to 19 (median, 13): 4 to 12 (median, 6) mutations in the RT gene, and 4 to 8 (median, 7) mutations in the protease gene. In the RT gene, the most frequent resistance mutations were found at codons 215 (100%), 41 (95%), 67 (91%), and 210 (77%). Multidrug-resistant mutation patterns including Q151M and insertion mutations at codon 69, which confer cross-resistance to the different nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors were detected in 1 and 3 patients, respectively; 1 patient with insertion mutation displayed a NGQGV [corrected] sequence at codons 67 to 70. In the protease gene, the most frequent mutations were found at codons 63 (95%), 10 (86%), 90(86%), 71(77%), 46 (50%), 36 (45%), and 84 (45%). Genotypic resistance to zidovudine, saquinavir, and indinavir was found in 100% of the patients. All patients showed also resistance or possible resistance to stavudine, abacavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir. Mutations conferring genotypic resistance to nonnucleoside analogue RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) were found in 12 (80%) of the NNRTI-experienced patients and 1 of 7 NNRTI-naive patients. Our results indicate that failure of HAART in the patients extensively pretreated results from the multiplicity of RT and protease mutations that confer genotypic resistance to almost all available antiretroviral drugs. In these patients, genotypic resistance tests confirm the lack of alternative salvage therapy strategies based on the currently available antiretroviral drugs.

Emergence of zidovudine and multidrug-resistance mutations in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase gene in therapy-naive patients receiving stavudine plus didanosine combination therapy. STADI Group

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of genotypic changes in the reverse transcriptase gene of HIV-1 occurring in antiretroviral naive patients treated by stavudine plus didanosine combination therapy.

METHODS

Sequence analysis (codons 1-230) was performed after amplification of the reverse transcriptase gene from plasma samples collected at baseline and at the end of treatment from 39 previously treatment-naive patients treated for 24-48 weeks.

RESULTS

At baseline, mutations associated with zidovudine resistance were detected in plasma from two patients: Asp67Asn/Lys219Gln and Leu210Trp. Among the 39 subjects, 18 (46%) developed mutations: one developed the Val75Thr/Ala mutation, four (10%) developed a Gln151Met multidrug-resistance mutation (MDR), associated in one of them with the Phe77Leu and the Phe116Tyr MDR mutations and 14 (36%) developed one or more zidovudine-specific mutations (Met41Leu, Asp67Asn, Lys70Arg, Leu210Trp, Thr215Tyr/Phe). The development of a Met41Leu zidovudine-specific mutation was associated with the development of a Gln151Met mutation in one patient. Other reverse transcriptase mutations known to confer resistance to nucleoside analogues were not detected. At inclusion, there was no statistical difference in HIV-1 load between patients who developed resistance mutations and those who did not. RNA HIV-1 load decrease was higher (P = 0.05) in patients who maintained a wild-type reverse transcriptase genotype (-2.22 log10 copies/ml) than in patients who developed resistance mutations (-1.14 log10 copies/ml).

CONCLUSION

Stavudine/didanosine combination therapy is associated with emergence of zidovudine-related resistance or MDR mutations in naive patients. These findings should be considered when optimizing salvage therapy for patients who have received a treatment including stavudine/didanosine combination.

Comparison of the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 assay with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay for quantitation of levels of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma of patients receiving stavudine-didanosine combination therapy

We compared the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 assay with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in plasma in the Stadi trail, which evaluated a stavudine plus didanosine combination therapy in 52 patients. HIV-1 RNA baseline values measured with AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 were significantly higher than those measured with QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0, and decreases in HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline were also found to be significantly higher when measured with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay. The frequency of HIV-1 RNA levels below the lower limit of quantitation was significantly higher with QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 than with AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0. Reanalysis of these results by an ultrasensitive procedure of AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 or by a modified version of the test that included additional primers adapted for non-B HIV-1 clades yielded greater differences between the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 assay and the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay. Our results indicate that a valid comparison of the virological efficacies obtained with different antiretroviral drug regimens requires the use of the same viral load quantitation procedure; further standardization between the different HIV-1 RNA quantitation kits is therefore needed.

Evaluation of the Nuclisens HIV-1 QT assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA levels in plasma

Nuclisens HIV-1 QT is a new version of the NASBA HIV-1 QT assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in plasma. The specificity of this assay was 100% in one laboratory and 99%-with nonrepeatability of the initial false positive-in another. The test was linear between 2.0 and 6.0 log RNA copies per ml. According to the input HIV-1 RNA concentration, accuracy varied from -0.11 to +0.10 log RNA copy per ml and precision varied from 0.66 to 0.14 log RNA copy per ml. Reproducibility decreased when the HIV-1 RNA level was near the lower limit of quantitation of the test. HIV-1 RNA could be quantitated by Nuclisens HIV-1 QT in 36% (laboratory 1) and 24% (laboratory 2) of clinical samples with HIV-1 RNA levels lower than the lower limit of quantitation by NASBA HIV-1 QT. Nuclisens HIV-1 QT was not suitable for measurement of RNA from clade G and group O HIV-1 strains.

[Once-daily administration of didanosine in combination with anti-retroviral zidovudine in previously untreated patients]

25 HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive adults were included in a 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of a zidovudine/didanosine combination therapy in which didanosine was administered once daily (200 mg if weight < 60 kg, 300 mg if weight > 60 kg) and zidovudine twice daily (500 mg/day if weight < 90 kg, 600 mg/day if weight > 90 kg). 5 patients discontinued their treatment early: 3 had poor compliance and 2 presented adverse events. Evaluation of treatment efficacy was based on CD4+ T cell enumeration and HIV RNA level quantitation in plasma (NASBA). Baseline values were 278 CD4+/mm3 and 5.42 log RNA copies/ml. Mean changes from baseline were +102 CD4+/mm3 and -2.14 log RNA copies/ml at week 8 and +156 CD4+/mm3 and -2.07 log RNA copies/ml at week 24. HIV RNA in plasma was lower than the detection limit (2.60 log RNA copies/ml) in 55% of patients at week 8 and in 30% at week 24. No major adverse events such as neuropathy or pancreatitis were observed. Once-daily administration of didanosine in combination with twice-daily administration of zidovudine is a well tolerated regimen that appears to be as effective ad the conventional zidovudine/didanosine combination regimen.

Comparative evaluation of three assays for the quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma

Reverse transcriptase-coupled polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor), the branched DNA (bDNA) method (Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA) and the nucleic acid sequence-based assay (NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT) were comparatively evaluated for the quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in plasma. Among 60 plasma specimens from HIV-1 infected patients, HIV-1 RNA was detected in 56 by Amplicor (sensitivity, 93.3%), in 41 by bDNA (sensitivity, 68.3%), and in 60 by NASBA (sensitivity, 100%). HIV-1 RNA was not detected by any of these methods in 34/34 plasma specimens from HIV-1-seronegative blood donors (specificity, 100%). The HIV-1 RNA levels as determined by the different methods were correlated significantly. The frequency of concordant results (log difference < 0.50) was 80.4% between Amplicor and NASBA, 77.5% between Amplicor and bDNA, and 58.6% between bDNA and NASBA. After initiation of antiviral therapy, HIV-1 RNA level variations observed with the three methods were similar. HIV-1 RNA levels were inversely correlated with the CD4+ T cell counts, whereas no correlation was found with HIV-1 p24-antigen levels. When the methods were evaluated for reproducibility, coefficients of variation ranged from 11% to 40% for Amplicor, from 6% to 35% for bDNA, and from 13% to 62% for NASBA. Quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in culture supernatants from HIV-1 subtype A to H strains showed that bDNA can be used to quantitate RNA from all HIV-1 subtypes, whereas Amplicor failed to detect RNA from subtype A strains and NASBA subtype G strains.

Significance of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-pp65 antigenemia in the diagnosis of CMV disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

To establish the diagnostic value of the cytomegalovirus (CMV)-pp65 antigenemia in CMV disease occurring in human immunodeficiency (HIV)-infected patients, CMV-pp65 antigen in polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs) was assayed in 373 samples from 138 randomly included patients followed up for symptomatic HIV-1 infection and the correlation between CMV-pp65 antigenemia and diagnosis of CMV disease was investigated. Thirty-seven CMV disease episodes were observed in 30 patients and 89.2% of these episodes were associated with a positive CMV-pp65 antigenemia. In contrast, 94% of the patients negative for CMV-pp65 antigenemia remained free of CMV disease. Patients with CMV disease had significantly higher levels of CMV-pp65 antigenemia than CMV disease-free patients (695 positive cells/2 x 10(5) PMNLs vs. 28 positive cells/2 x 10(5) PMNLs). The positive and negative predictive values of the test were 45% and 94%, respectively, but were 93% and 80%, respectively, when a CMV-pp65 antigenemia level of > 100 positive cells/2 x 10(5) PMNLs was taken into consideration. These results indicate that the CMV-pp65 antigenemia assay is useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of CMV disease in HIV-infected patients.

Single dose pharmacokinetics of fenspiride hydrochloride: phase I clinical trial

The absolute bioavailability of fenspiride has been studied in twelve healthy volunteers. It was administered IV and orally in single doses of 80 mg fenspiride hydrochloride according to a randomised crossover pattern. Following IV administration, the plasma clearance of fenspiride was about 184 ml.min-1, and its apparent volume of distribution was moderately large (215 l). When given orally as a tablet, fenspiride exhibited fairly slow ab- sorption; the maximum plasma concentration (206 ng.ml-1) was achieved 6 h after administration. The absolute bioavailability was almost complete (90%). The tablet had slow release characteristics. The elimination half-life obtained from the plasma data was 14 to 16 h independent of the route of administration.

[Comparative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of Dolotren retard and Dolotren]

A randomized crossover study was designed in order to evaluate the bioequivalence of a sustained-release preparation (DR) of diclofenac sodium (Dolotrén RETARD) with respect to an enteric coated (D) tablet (Dolotren). For this purpose the bioavailability of both formulations, orally administered in single and multiple doses, was determined. Nine healthy volunteers were included in this study, receiving 100 mg of D and 100 mg of DR, firstly in single dose and then for 15 days b.i.d. for D group and once a day for DR group. For the analytical determination of diclofenac, blood samples at established time intervals, the day of the single dose and the 3rd, 7th and 15th day of multiple dose administration, were taken. The following kinetic parameters were determined: Cmac, tmax, alpha and beta, clearance, ka, area under the curve and absolute and relative bioavailability. When administered both endovenous and orally, the great interindividual variability in the kinetic characteristics of diclofenac sodium is evidenced. The lag time (tlag) for DR is 0.4 h, shorter than for D (2.2 h), which indicates a faster absorption in the upper sections of the gastrointestinal tract. Also tmax was shorter for Dr (1.9 h) than for D (4.3 h). Cmax obtained with D was higher tan with DR. The diclofenac sodium elimination process from plasma is significantly slower with DR than with D (t1/2 beta = 18.1 h and 2.5 h, respectively). In consequence, quantifiable plasmatic levels are maintained for at least 24 hours after administration of DR, but not of D. Absolute bioavailability of both preparations is about 80%, with great interindividual variations. Significant differences between the two preparations could not be demonstrated. Relative bioavailability between DR and D was 91.5%. None of the preparations when administered in repeated doses, D every 12 hours and DR every 24 hours, produced accumulation, neither their pharmacokinetic characteristics changed. Clinical and biological tolerance of both preparations were excellent, at doses used and for the period of time studied. Dolotren Retard is absorbed orally faster than Dolotren and maintains plasmatic levels longer, which allows it to be administered once a day, with a lesser incidence of undesirable effects related to Cmax.

[In vitro effect of itraconazole against various species of Candida]

The authors compared the in vitro antifungal activity of itraconazole to that of miconazole against various species of Candida. The MIC of 88 strains of Candida (C. albicans, C. guilliermondii, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata) was determined by the agar dilution method using casitone medium at pH 5.5-5.6 for miconazole and pH 7.2-7.4 for itraconazole. C. albicans and C. glabrata were found to be less sensitive in vitro to itraconazole than to miconazole; the contrary was observed for C. parapsilosis. The sensitivity of C. guilliermondii to these antifungal agents was similar. The MIC 50, MIC 90 and G.MIC values for itraconazole with respect to 42 strains of C. albicans was 0.10, 1.4 and 0.138 micrograms ml-1, respectively; the MIC 90 and G.MIC values for miconazole were 0.5 and 0.021 micrograms ml-1, respectively. The effect of itraconazole on the ultrastructure of C. albicans yeast cells and spheroplasts was studied by scanning electron microscopy. This triazole molecule modified the cell wall of C. albicans, caused cell stretching and provoked defective separation between mother and daughter cells. Itraconazole altered the cytoplasmic membrane of the spheroplasts causing them to have a "spongy" appearance. Yeast cells treated with itraconazole appeared to liberate their spheroplast with difficulty.

[Comparative action of 8 azole derivatives against Candida albicans: fungistatic action and cytologic study by scanning electron microscopy]

The authors compared the in vitro antifungal activity of eight imidazole derivatives (clotrimazole, econazole, isoconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, oxiconazole, terconazole, tioconazole) against 42 strains of Candida albicans by the agar dilution method using casitone medium. The geometric (G) mean MIC values, the MIC 90 and the MIC 50 values and the corresponding standard deviations of each antifungal agent were determined. The G-MIC values were found to be in the range of 0.008-0.390 micrograms ml-1. The effects of these eight antifungal agents on the ultrastructure of C. albicans yeast cells and spheroplasts were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed a good correlation between the lesions observed and the structure of the imidazole derivatives tested. On the basis of the SEM results, the compounds could be divided into three groups: (1) ketoconazole and terconazole; (2) econazole, isoconazole, miconazole, oxiconazole and tioconazole; (3) clotrimazole.