NCMP-04. INCIDENCE AND OUTCOMES OF BRAIN METASTASES IN PATIENTS WITH EXTRA-PULMONARY NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) incidence in patients with extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP-NENs) is unclear, with no available management recommendations. This study aimed to review the clinical presentation, management and survival outcomes of patients with EP-NENs and BMs at a European Centre of Excellence.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre analysis of consecutive patients with EP-NENs (Aug 2004-Feb 2020) was conducted. Median overall survival (OS)/survival from BMs diagnosis were estimated (Kaplan Meier).

RESULTS

Of 786 patients, 15 (1.9%) had BMs, median age 61y (range 15–77); 8 (53%) male, primary NEN site: unknown 40%; oesophageal 13%; small bowel 13%; pancreas 13%; gastric 7%; cervix 7% and bladder 7%. Most patients with BMs had grade 3 (G3) NENs (11, 73%), 3 (20%) were G2 and 1 (7%)G1. Eight (53%) had poorly-differentiated NENs, 6 well-differentiated and 1 not recorded. Two (13%) patients had synchronous BMs at diagnosis, whilst 13 (87%) developed BMs metachronously. Median time to development of BMs after initial NEN diagnosis: 15.9 months (range 2.5–139.5). Five patients had a solitary BM, 4 had 2–9 lesions and 6 had >10 BMs. The most commonly affected sites were the cerebrum (13, 87%), cerebellum (6, 40%), leptomeninges (2, 13%) and orbit (1, 7%). The most common presenting symptoms were limb weakness, headache, confusion, visual disturbance (each n=3, 20%), seizures (2, 13%), word-finding difficulty (2, 13%) and facial weakness/ptosis (1, 7%). Median OS from initial NEN diagnosis was 23.6-months [95%-CI 15.2–31.3]; median time to death from BMs diagnosis was 3.0-months [95%-CI 0.0–8.3]. Treatment of BMs was surgery (n=3); radiotherapy (n=6); 5 had WBRT, one localised radiotherapy (orbit). Six (40%) had best supportive care.

CONCLUSION

BMs in patients with EP-NENs are rare and predominantly in G3 NENs, with diverse intracranial distribution. Although uncommon, BMs from NENs behave aggressively and greater understanding is needed to improve therapeutic outcomes.

INNV-24. THE EXPERIENCE OF FATIGUED BRAIN TUMOUR PATIENTS RECEIVING INNOVATIVE LIFESTYLE INTERVENTIONS: QUALITATIVE RESULTS FROM THE BT-LIFE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

BACKGROUND

Most brain tumour patients report clinically significant fatigue. Here, we aimed to explore patients’ views of the experience, acceptability and usefulness of participating in a trial of novel lifestyle interventions for fatigue.

METHODS

Qualitative sub-study within the ‘BT-LIFE’ multi-centre phase II RCT (submitted separately). Fatigued adult primary brain tumour patients in receipt of one of the trial interventions (‘Health Coaching’: eight coaching sessions targeting lifestyle behaviours; plus or minus ‘Activation Coaching’: two additional interviews targeting motivation to change) took part in a semi-structured interview following completion of the interventions. A realist approach to the ‘framework’ method was used to analyse verbatim transcripts, with inductive and deductive codes assigned to the realist domains of Context-Mechanism-Outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty themes and 53 sub-themes were derived from the data. Patients’ (n= 21) understanding of and engagement with the interventions were influenced by their expectations, attitudes to life, and experience of living with a brain tumour. Behaviour change was supported by goal-setting, monitoring using a weekly diary, the motivational ‘push’ by coaches, and family/ social support where available. Barriers to engagement included technical diary difficulties, time limitations including work and holiday schedules, and interference from life events. Most patients described beneficial changes in health behaviours, self-efficacy, and general health and wellbeing. About half indicated actual improvement in fatigue levels; others reported no direct change but they could now cope better with fatigue. A minority experienced no change or worsening fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Most fatigued brain tumour patients were able to make positive changes after lifestyle coaching, despite physical and cognitive impairments. However, their experiences were varied. Those for whom the interventions were a good ‘fit’ with their pre-existing outlook, lifestyle, and physical and emotional capabilities, appeared to achieve most benefit. These qualitative findings will inform further work addressing the disabling symptom of brain tumour-related fatigue.

An audit of the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma in the UK: have recent trial results changed treatment?

Aim:

We investigated uptake of short-course chemo-radiotherapy and compared outcomes with other treatment schedules in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

Methods:

Patients aged 65 or over with a diagnosis of GBM were identified from an 18-month period from three centers in the UK. The primary end point of this study was overall survival from the date of diagnosis.

Results:

The analysis included 210 patients. Overall median survival was 5.0 months. Approximately 31.9% of patients received combined chemoradiation; multivariate analysis showed that patients who received standard chemoradiation were at a reduced risk of death than those receiving hypofractionated chemoradiation.

Discussion:

In this retrospective study, patients treated with standard chemoradiation experienced better outcomes than patients receiving hypofractionated chemoradiation. Patient selection likely contributed to these findings.

High content screening of patient-derived cell lines highlights the potential of non-standard chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults, yet survival outcomes remain poor. First line treatment is well established, however disease invariably recurs and improving prognosis is challenging. With the aim of personalizing therapy at recurrence, we have established a high content screening (HCS) platform to analyze the sensitivity profile of seven patient-derived cancer stem cell lines to 83 FDA-approved chemotherapy drugs, with and without irradiation.

METHODS

Seven cancer stem cell lines were derived from patients with GBM and, along with the established cell line U87-MG, each patient-derived line was cultured in tandem in serum-free conditions as adherent monolayers and three-dimensional neurospheres. Chemotherapeutics were screened at multiple concentrations and cells double-stained to observe their effect on both cell death and proliferation. Sensitivity was classified using high-throughput algorithmic image analysis.

RESULTS

Cell line specific drug responses were observed across the seven patient-derived cell lines. Few agents were seen to have radio-sensitizing effects, yet some drug classes showed a marked difference in efficacy between monolayers and neurospheres. In vivo validation of six drugs suggested that cell death readout in a three-dimensional culture scenario is a more physiologically relevant screening model and could be used effectively to assess the chemosensitivity of patient-derived GBM lines.

CONCLUSION

The study puts forward a number of non-standard chemotherapeutics that could be useful in the treatment of recurrent GBM, namely mitoxantrone, bortezomib and actinomycin D, whilst demonstrating the potential of HCS to be used for personalized treatment based on the chemosensitivity profile of patient tumor cells.

PARADIGM-2: Two parallel phase I studies of olaparib and radiotherapy or olaparib and radiotherapy plus temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, with treatment stratified by MGMT status

Glioblastoma has a dismal prognosis and molecular targeted agents have failed to improve outcomes to date. PARADIGM-2 is a phase I dose escalation study evaluating olaparib plus radiotherapy ± temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, using MGMT methylation status to stratify patients and inform treatment schedules.

Interim results from the CATNON trial (EORTC study 26053-22054) of treatment with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma: a phase 3, randomised, open-label intergroup study

BACKGROUND

The role of temozolomide chemotherapy in newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas, which are associated with lower sensitivity to chemotherapy and worse prognosis than 1p/19q co-deleted tumours, is unclear. We assessed the use of radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in adults with non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas.

METHODS

This was a phase 3, randomised, open-label study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma with WHO performance status scores of 0-2. The randomisation schedule was generated with the electronic EORTC web-based ORTA system. Patients were assigned in equal numbers (1:1:1:1), using the minimisation technique, to receive radiotherapy (59·4 Gy in 33 fractions of 1·8 Gy) alone or with adjuvant temozolomide (12 4-week cycles of 150-200 mg/m² temozolomide given on days 1-5); or to receive radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m² per day, with or without adjuvant temozolomide. The primary endpoint was overall survival adjusted for performance status score, age, 1p loss of heterozygosity, presence of oligodendroglial elements, and MGMT promoter methylation status, analysed by intention to treat. We did a planned interim analysis after 219 (41%) deaths had occurred to test the null hypothesis of no efficacy (threshold for rejection p<0·0084). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00626990.

FINDINGS

At the time of the interim analysis, 745 (99%) of the planned 748 patients had been enrolled. The hazard ratio for overall survival with use of adjuvant temozolomide was 0·65 (99·145% CI 0·45-0·93). Overall survival at 5 years was 55·9% (95% CI 47·2-63·8) with and 44·1% (36·3-51·6) without adjuvant temozolomide. Grade 3-4 adverse events were seen in 8-12% of 549 patients assigned temozolomide, and were mainly haematological and reversible.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma. Further analysis of the role of concurrent temozolomide treatment and molecular factors is needed.

FUNDING

Schering Plough and MSD.

Brain tumor research in the United Kingdom: current perspective and future challenges. A strategy document from the NCRI Brain Tumor CSG

The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) is a partnership of charity and government research funders whose purpose is to improve health and quality of life by accelerating progress in cancer-related research through collaboration. Under this umbrella, the NCRI Brain Tumor Clinical Studies Group is focused on improving clinical outcomes for adult patients with brain and central nervous system tumors, including those with brain metastasis from other primary sites. This document discusses the current state of clinical brain tumor research in the United Kingdom and the challenges to increasing study and trial opportunities for patients. The clinical research priorities are defined along with a strategy to strengthen the existing brain tumor research network, improve access to tissue and imaging and to develop the future leadership for brain tumor research in the United Kingdom. This strategy document may serve as a framework for other organizations and countries.

Results of the OPARATIC trial: A phase I dose escalation study of olaparib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (GBM)

2022

Background: Olaparib, a small molecule inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), may improve GBM outcomes by enhancing cytotoxic effects of ionising radiation and TMZ. Clinical development of PARP inhibitors has been restricted by exacerbation of hematological toxicity. We investigated tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) of olaparib and safety and tolerability of its combination with TMZ. Methods: Dose escalation explored different schedules of olaparib (tablet formulation) with 42 day cycles of daily low dose TMZ. A dose expansion cohort evaluated the maximum tolerated schedule. PK analysis was performed on tumor and blood samples from patients undergoing neurosurgical resection, who received 4 olaparib doses pre-operatively. Results: 48 patients were recruited (median age 51(18-68); 29 male, 19 female) of whom 27 underwent surgery and 35 received olaparib/TMZ and were evaluable. 13 evaluable patients received expansion dose schedule (median age 54(21-67); 9 male, 4 female). Olaparib was detected in 73 of 74 tumor core specimens from 27 patients; mean conc. 588nM (97-1374nM), and in 27 of 28 tumor margin specimens from 10 patients; mean conc. 500nM (97-1237nM). Margin: core ratios ranged from 0.2–3.9(mean 1.2); tumor: plasma ratios ranged from 0.01 to 0.9 (mean 0.25). Olaparib dosing on days 1-5 was hindered by myelosuppression. Expansion cohort dose was defined as TMZ 75 mg/m2daily plus olaparib 150 mg (OD) days 1-3 weekly. Of 13 evaluable patients receiving expansion dose-schedule, 9 completed cycle 1, 2 completed cycle 2 and 2 completed cycle 3. Currently 45% of the evaluable patients remain progression-free at 6 months, with 2 still on treatment (full data set May2017). Of 35 evaluable patients, 24 experienced AE Grade ≥3 (see Table). Conclusions: Olaparib penetrates both core and margins of recurrent GBM despite failing to penetrate the intact brain barrier in pre-clinical heathy rodent models. Combination with extended low dose TMZ is safe and well tolerated, yielding encouraging 6 month progression-free survival rates. Clinical trial information: NCT01390571. [Table: see text]

A Cancer Research UK First Time in Human Phase I Trial of IMA950 (Novel Multipeptide Therapeutic Vaccine) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

To perform a two-cohort, phase I safety and immunogenicity study of IMA950 in addition to standard chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. IMA950 is a novel glioblastoma-specific therapeutic vaccine containing 11 tumor-associated peptides (TUMAP), identified on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) surface receptors in primary human glioblastoma tissue.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were HLA-A*02-positive and had undergone tumor resection. Vaccination comprised 11 intradermal injections with IMA950 plus granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) over a 24-week period, beginning 7 to 14 days prior to initiation of chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 1) or 7 days after chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 2). Safety was assessed according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0 and TUMAP-specific T-cell immune responses determined. Secondary observations included progression-free survival (PFS), pretreatment regulatory T cell (Treg) levels, and the effect of steroids on T-cell responses.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were recruited. Related adverse events included minor injection site reactions, rash, pruritus, fatigue, neutropenia and single cases of allergic reaction, anemia and anaphylaxis. Two patients experienced grade 3 dose-limiting toxicity of fatigue and anaphylaxis. Of 40 evaluable patients, 36 were TUMAP responders and 20 were multi-TUMAP responders, with no important differences between cohorts. No effect of pretreatment Treg levels on IMA950 immunogenicity was observed, and steroids did not affect TUMAP responses. PFS rates were 74% at 6 months and 31% at 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

IMA950 plus GM-CSF was well-tolerated with the primary immunogenicity endpoint of observing multi-TUMAP responses in at least 30% of patients exceeded. Further development of IMA950 is encouraged. Clin Cancer Res; 22(19); 4776-85. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Lowenstein and Castro, p. 4760.

Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Cediranib plus Gefitinib with Cediranib plus Placebo in Subjects with Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, failed to show benefit over lomustine in relapsed glioblastoma. One resistance mechanism for cediranib is up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This study aimed to determine if dual therapy with cediranib and the oral EGFR inhibitor gefitinib improved outcome in recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This was a multi-center randomized, two-armed, double-blinded phase II study comparing cediranib plus gefitinib versus cediranib plus placebo in subjects with first relapse/first progression of glioblastoma following surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and radiologic response rate. Recruitment was terminated early following suspension of the cediranib program. 38 subjects (112 planned) were enrolled with 19 subjects in each treatment arm. Median PFS with cediranib plus gefitinib was 3.6 months compared to 2.8 months for cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.72, 90% CI; 0.41 to 1.26). Median OS was 7.2 months with cediranib plus gefitinib and 5.5 months with cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.68, 90% CI; 0.39 to 1.19). Eight subjects (42%) had a partial response in the cediranib plus gefitinib arm versus five patients (26%) in the cediranib plus placebo arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Cediranib and gefitinib in combination is tolerated in patients with glioblastoma. Incomplete recruitment led to the study being underpowered. However, a trend towards improved survival and response rates with the addition of gefitinib to cediranib was observed. Further studies of the combination incorporating EGFR and VEGF inhibition are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01310855.

Vascular biomarkers derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI predict response of vestibular schwannoma to antiangiogenic therapy in type 2 neurofibromatosis

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic therapy of vestibular schwannoma (VS) in type 2 neurofibromatosis can produce tumor shrinkage with response rates of 40%-60%. This study examines the predictive value of parameter-derived MRI in this setting.

METHODS

Twelve patients with 20 VSs were recruited. Each had at least one rapidly growing tumor. Patients were treated with bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients with stable or reduced VS volume were maintained at 2.5-5 mg every 4 weeks after 6 months. Those who failed treatment had their bevacizumab discontinued. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI performed prior to treatment using a high temporal resolution technique, and data were analyzed to allow measurement of contrast transfer coefficient (K(trans)), vascular fraction (v(p)), extravascular-extracellular fraction (v(e)). Relaxation rate (R1(N)) was measured using a variable flip angle technique. Apparent diffusional coefficient (ADC) was calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging. The predictive power of microvascular parameters and ADC were examined using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Responding tumors were larger (P < .001), had lower R1(N) (P < .001), and higher K(trans) (P < .05) and ADC (P < .01). They showed increases in R1(N) (P < .01) and reduction of K(trans) (P < .01) and ADC (P < .01). Modeling to predict response demonstrated significant independent predictive power for R1(N) (Β = - 0.327, P < .001), and K(trans) (Β = 0.156, P < .05). Modeling to predict percentage change in tumor volume at 90 days identified baseline tumor volume (Β = 5.503, P < .05), R1(N) (Β = - 5.844, P < .05), and K(trans) (Β = 5.622, P < .05) as independent significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis, biomarkers from DCE-MRI are predictive of VS volume response to inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition.