NEIL3 promotes hepatoma epithelial-mesenchymal transition by activating the BRAF/MEK/ERK/TWIST signaling pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most prevalent visceral neoplasms. So far, reliable biomarkers for predicting HCC recurrence in patients undergoing surgery are far from adequate. In the aim of searching for genetic biomarkers involved in HCC development, we performed analyses of cDNA microarrays and found that the DNA repair gene NEIL3 was remarkably overexpressed in tumors. NEIL3 belongs to the Fpg/Nei protein superfamily, which contains DNA glycosylase activity required for the base excision repair for DNA lesions. Notably, the other Fpg/Nei family proteins NEIL1 and NEIL2, which have the same glycosylase activity as NEIL3, were not elevated in HCC; NEIL3 was specifically induced to participate in HCC development independently of its glycosylase activity. Using RNA-seq and invasion/migration assays, we found that NEIL3 elevated the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) factors, including the E/N-cadherin switch and the transcription of MMP genes, and promoted the invasion, migration, and stemness phenotypes of HCC cells. Moreover, NEIL3 directly interacted with the key EMT player TWIST1 to enhance invasion and migration activities. In mouse orthotopic HCC studies, NEIL3 overexpression also caused a prominent E-cadherin decrease, tumor volume increase, and lung metastasis, indicating that NEIL3 led to EMT and tumor metastasis in mice. We further found that NEIL3 induced the transcription of MDR1 (ABCB1) and BRAF genes through the canonical E-box (CANNTG) promoter region, which the TWIST1 transcription factor recognizes and binds to, leading to the BRAF/MEK/ERK pathway-mediated cell proliferation as well as anti-cancer drug resistance, respectively. In the HCC cohort, the tumor NEIL3 level demonstrated a high positive correlation with disease-free and overall survival after surgery. In conclusion, NEIL3 activated the BRAF/MEK/ERK/TWIST pathway-mediated EMT and therapeutic resistances, leading to HCC progression. Targeted inhibition of NEIL3 in HCC individuals with NEIL3 induction is a promising therapeutic approach. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein after sorafenib (REACH-2 China): A randomised, multicentre, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

In the global REACH-2 study, ramucirumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). REACH-2 China study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in Chinese patients with advanced HCC (NCT02435433).

METHODS

REACH-2 China was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done at 31 centres in China between Sep 16, 2015, and March 15, 2021. Patients with advanced HCC and AFP ≥400 ng/mL after first-line sorafenib were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously or placebo Q2W, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat, and safety in patients who received any treatment.

FINDINGS

Of 104 Chinese patients enrolled (44 in the global study and 60 in the China extension study), 70 received ramucirumab and 34 received placebo. Median OS was 9·1 months in the ramucirumab group and 6·2 months in the placebo group (HR = 0·854 [95% CI: 0·536, 1·359]). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event were hypertension (5 [7·1%] of 70 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 1 [2.9%] of 34 in the placebo group), pneumonia (5 [7·1%] vs 1 [2·9%]), and hyponatraemia (4 [5·7%] vs 0 [0%]).

INTERPRETATION

Ramucirumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared to placebo for Chinese patients with advanced HCC and elevated AFP, although lacking statistical superiority. Ramucirumab was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile. The results are consistent with those of the global REACH-2 study, supporting a favourable risk-benefit profile for ramucirumab in this population.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company, USA.

Tumor-associated macrophages promote resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells against sorafenib by activating CXCR2 signaling

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib (SOR) is the first line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but resistance develops frequently. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been reported to affect the progression of HCC. We therefore aimed to study the role of TAMs in promoting SOR resistance.

METHODS

Immunofluorescence staining for the M2 marker CD204 and the cancer stem cell (CSC) markers CD44 and CD133 was performed in paired HCC and adjacent noncancerous tissues and HCC tissues stratified by response of SOR treatment. HCC/U937 coculture system and cytokines were used to induce M2 polarization for studying the effects of M2 TAMs on CSC properties and apoptotic death of HCC cells after SOR treatment.

RESULTS

Higher expression of CD204, CD44, and CD133 was observed in patients with SOR nonresponse (SNR) than in those with SOR response (SR), suggesting that SNR is positively correlated to levels of CSCs and M2 TAMs. After coculture, M2 TAMs could increase the level of CSCs but decrease SOR-induced apoptosis. Incubation of HCC cells with coculture conditioned medium increased the formation of spheres that were resistant to SOR. Furthermore, CXCL1 and CXCL2 were found to be the potential paracrine factors released by M2 TAMs to upregulate SOR resistance in HCC cells. Treatment with CXCL1 and CXCL2 could increase HCC CSC activity but decrease SOR-induced apoptosis by affecting BCL-2 family gene expression. Using pharmacological inhibitors, CXCR2/ERK signaling was found to be critical to CXCL1- and CXCL2-mediated SOR resistance.

CONCLUSION

This study identified CXCL1, CXCL2, and their downstream CXCR2/ERK signaling as potential therapeutic targets to overcome SOR resistance in HCC.

The impact of starting dose with or without subsequent dose escalation of liposomal irinotecan on treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) improves survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after progression to gemcitabine-based therapy. Few studies have examined whether the starting dose and dose escalation of nal-IRI in subsequent treatment cycles may influence patient outcomes and toxicity profiles. A total of 667 patients who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for PDAC treatment between August 2018 and November 2020 at nine medical centers in Taiwan were included and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were allocated to the standard starting dose (SD), reduced starting dose (RD) without escalation, and RD with escalation of nal-IRI groups for comparison of survival outcome and safety. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for possible confounding variables. Nal-IRI was prescribed at SD, RD without escalation, and RD with escalation in 465 (69.7%), 147 (22.0), and 55 (8.2%), respectively. RD with escalation patients had significantly longer treatment cycles (6, range 2-25) than SD (5, range 1-42, P<0.001) and RD without escalation patients (4, range 1-26, P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the patients were as follows: SD, 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-6.7); RD with escalation, 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.2); and RD without escalation, 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.6-4.5). After PSM to adjust for potential confounders, RD without escalation patients still had the poorest OS compared to the other two groups (P<0.001), while the OS difference between SD and RD with escalation patients was insignificant (P=0.10). SD patients had higher incidences of ≥ grade 3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia than the other two groups. Administering nal-IRI at RD followed by dose escalation in subsequent treatment cycles is safe and does not compromise survival outcomes in selected patients with PDAC receiving nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV.

Bevacizumab and atezolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Taiwanese subgroup analysis on efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND

The combination of bevacizumab and atezolizumab has been established as a standard first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We examined the treatment outcomes of patients in Taiwan who received the combination in 2 pivotal clinical trials.

METHODS

All patients who resided in Taiwan, were enrolled in the IMbrave150 and GO30140 studies, and received bevacizumab and atezolizumab as the first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC were included. We extracted and pooled anonymous raw data from the study records.

RESULTS

We enrolled 40 patients, with the median age of 62.5 years; 36 (90%) had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C disease. The response rate was 37.5%, including 3 (7.5%) complete responses. The disease control rate was 85%. The median duration of response was 21.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6-not estimable). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.6 (95% CI, 5.6-18.6) and 24.9 months (95% CI, 14.2-not estimable), respectively. The most common adverse events of all grades were proteinuria (50%) and hypertension (37.5%), the median onset of which were 157 and 127 days, respectively. Bevacizumab and atezolizumab treatment had to be interrupted in 20 (50%) and 13 (32.5%) patients, respectively. Among patients whose treatment duration was ≥6 months, 50% of them had to skip bevacizumab, but no signal of poorer PFS or OS was observed.

CONCLUSION

In Taiwanese patients with advanced HCC, the efficacy and safety outcomes of bevacizumab and atezolizumab treatment were generally consistent with the global intent-to-treat populations.

Predictive value of albumin combined with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for efficacy and safety profiles in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin

Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) treatment has demonstrated survival benefits but noticeable side effects in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that is refractory to gemcitabine-based therapy. This study aimed to explore whether combining albumin with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), herein known as the albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio score (ANS), could be utilized as a simple tool to predict survival and safety profiles in such patient groups. We retrospectively enrolled 434 consecutive PDAC patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between 2018 and 2020 at nine medical centers in Taiwan. Patients were divided into three groups: ANS 0 (high albumin and low NLR), ANS 1 (low albumin or high NLR), and ANS 2 (low albumin and high NLR), for comparison. The median overall survival times for the ANS 0, 1, and 2 groups were 8.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0-10.3 months), 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-6.0 months), and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.3 months), respectively. The ANS was found to be an independent variable for overall survival and time-to-treatment failure in multivariate analyses. Patients in the ANS 2 group had significantly higher incidences of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events than those in the other two groups. The present study showed that the ANS was an independent prognosticator in PDAC patients receiving nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy. The ANS can be a simple predictor of survival outcome and safety profiles in PDAC patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV.

Alpha-Fetoprotein as a Potential Surrogate Biomarker for Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Atezolizumab + bevacizumab is the new standard of care for systemic treatment-naïve, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This exploratory study investigated on-treatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response as a potential surrogate biomarker of prognosis for the combination therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Data from Group A of the phase Ib GO30140 study were used to identify the optimal time for AFP measurement and AFP cutoffs to differentiate patients by their best confirmed response per independent review facility-assessed RECIST (IRF-RECIST) version 1.1: responders from nonresponders and patients with disease control from primary progressors. We applied these cutoffs to independent data from the atezolizumab + bevacizumab arm of the phase III IMbrave150 trial to distinguish patients based on (i) overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per IRF-RECIST 1.1 and (ii) best confirmed response per IRF-RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

We derived AFP cutoffs of ≥75% decrease and ≤10% increase from baseline at 6 weeks to identify responders and those who had disease control, respectively. These cutoffs had high sensitivity and specificity in GO30140. In IMbrave150 patients, sensitivity was 0.59 and specificity was 0.86 for the ≥75% decrease AFP cutoff; the sensitivity was 0.77 and specificity was 0.44 for the ≤10% increase AFP cutoff. Both AFP cutoffs were associated with longer OS and PFS, particularly in patients with hepatitis B virus etiology (HR < 0.5; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

AFP response at 6 weeks after initiating treatment is a potential surrogate biomarker of prognosis for patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab + bevacizumab. See related commentary by Cappuyns and Llovet, p. 3405.

Dosing Pattern and Early Cumulative Dose of Liposomal Irinotecan in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Study

Introduction

This multicenter, real-world cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early cumulative dose administration and dosing pattern of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

Material and Methods

The electronic medical records of mPDAC patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in nine participating centers were manually reviewed. To accommodate to the NAPOLI-1 study population, only patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score of 0–1 were included. The survival impact of the relative 6-week cumulative dose and dosing pattern (standard vs. reduced starting dose, with and without further dose modification) were investigated.

Results

Of the 473 included patients, their median overall survival (mOS) was 6.8 [95% CI, 6.2–7.7] months. The mOS of patients who received a relative 6-week cumulative dose of &gt;80%, 60%–80%, and &lt;60% were 7.9, 8.2, and 4.3 months, respectively (p&lt;0.0001). Their survival impact remained significant after covariate adjustment using Cox regression. The mOS was 8.0–8.2 months in patients with a standard starting dose with and without early dose modification, and 9.3 and 6.7 months in those who had a reduced starting dose with and without escalation in the subsequent treatment, respectively. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia and diarrhea was 23.3% and 2.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results support the use of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in gemcitabine-refractory mPDAC and suggest that a lower starting dose followed by a re-escalation strategy could achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those with standard starting doses in real-world practice.

Abstract CT129: A multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket study of the coformulation of vibostolimab with pembrolizumab, with or without other anticancer therapies, in select solid tumors

Background: T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is coexpressed with PD-1 on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in tumors. Preclinical models and early clinical data have shown enhanced antitumor activity when an anti-TIGIT antibody is co-administered with an anti-PD-1 antibody. The efficacy and safety of a novel coformulation of the anti-TIGIT antibody vibostolimab and the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (vibostolimab/pembrolizumab), alone or in combination with other anticancer therapies, will be investigated in select advanced solid tumors in a multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket trial (NCT05007106).

Trial Design: Key eligibility criteria are histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced (locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic) solid tumor naive to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (Table 1). Patients will be assigned to treatment randomly (cohort A1) or nonrandomly (cohorts A2-G) by tumor type and biomarker status (Table 1). All patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient/physician decision to withdraw, or 35 cycles of vibostolimab/pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone. Primary end points are objective response rate (all cohorts) and progression-free survival (PFS; cohort A1) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (cohort A1) or investigator (cohorts A2-G). Secondary end points include PFS per RECIST v1.1 assessed by the investigator (cohorts A2-G), quality of life (cohort A1), and duration of response, overall survival, and safety (all cohorts). Enrollment is ongoing.

Table 1. Patient Population and Treatment by Cohort Cohort Patient Population Treatmenta A1b PD-L1-positive (CPS ≥1) cervical cancer that progressed on ≥1 line of therapy Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV Pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV A2 PD-L1-negative (CPS &lt;1) cervical cancer that progressed on ≥1 line of therapy Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV B1 dMMR endometrial cancer that progressed after 1 prior systemic, platinum-based chemotherapy Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV B2 pMMR endometrial cancer that progressed after 1 prior systemic, platinum-based chemotherapy Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV + lenvatinib 20 mg QD PO C PD-L1-positive (CPS ≥1) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (previously untreated) Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV D Biliary tract cancer that progressed after 1 prior systemic therapy Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV E Esophageal cancer (previously untreated) Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV + 5-FU 800 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 Q3W IV + cisplatin 80 mg/m2 Q3W IV for ≤6 cycles F Triple-negative breast cancer (previously untreated) Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV + paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 Q4W IV G Hepatocellular carcinoma (previously untreated) Vibostolimab 200 mg/pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W IV + lenvatinib 12 mg/8 mg QD PO 5-FU, fluorouracil; CPS, combined positive score; dMRR, mismatch repair-deficient; IV, intravenously; pMRR, mismatch repair-proficient; PO, orally; Q3W, every 3 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; QD, once daily. aAll treatments are ≤35 cycles unless otherwise indicated. bPatients in cohort A1 will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive one of the 2 treatments; analysis will be stratified by prior bevacizumab use.

Citation Format: Iwona Lugowska, Carlos Rojas, Alejandro Falcon Gonzalez, Lucia Gonzalez Cortijo, Chih-Hung Hsu, Chia-Jui Yen, Sun Young Rha, Kan Yonemori, Daneng Li, Ravit Geva, Pamela Salman, Eduardo Yanez Ruiz, Qi Liu, Tanya Keenan, Jane Healy, Mariusz Kwiatkowski. A multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket study of the coformulation of vibostolimab with pembrolizumab, with or without other anticancer therapies, in select solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT129.

A first-in-human phase 1/2 study of FGF401 and combination of FGF401 with spartalizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or biomarker-selected solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Deregulation of FGF19-FGFR4 signaling is found in several cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nominating it for therapeutic targeting. FGF401 is a potent, selective FGFR4 inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models. This study was designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), characterize PK/PD, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of FGF401 alone and combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody, spartalizumab.

METHODS

Patients with HCC or other FGFR4/KLB expressing tumors were enrolled. Dose-escalation was guided by a Bayesian model. Phase 2 dose-expansion enrolled patients with HCC from Asian countries (group1), non-Asian countries (group2), and patients with other solid tumors expressing FGFR4 and KLB (group3). FGF401 and spartalizumab combination was evaluated in patients with HCC.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were treated in the phase I with single-agent FGF401 at 50 to 150 mg. FGF401 displayed favorable PK characteristics and no food effect when dosed with low-fat meals. The RP2D was established as 120 mg qd. Six of 70 patients experienced grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities: increase in transaminases (n = 4) or blood bilirubin (n = 2). In phase 2, 30 patients in group 1, 36 in group 2, and 20 in group 3 received FGF401. In total, 8 patients experienced objective responses (1 CR, 7 PR; 4 each in phase I and phase II, respectively). Frequent adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (73.8%), increased AST (47.5%), and ALT (43.8%). Increase in levels of C4, total bile acid, and circulating FGF19, confirmed effective FGFR4 inhibition. Twelve patients received FGF401 plus spartalizumab. RP2D was established as FGF401 120 mg qd and spartalizumab 300 mg Q3W; 2 patients reported PR.

CONCLUSIONS

At biologically active doses, FGF401 alone or combined with spartalizumab was safe in patients with FGFR4/KLB-positive tumors including HCC. Preliminary clinical efficacy was observed. Further clinical evaluation of FGF401 using a refined biomarker strategy is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02325739 .

Clinical outcomes associated with tislelizumab in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib (SOR) or lenvatinib (LEN) in RATIONALE-208

4072

Background: Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated clinical activity and was well tolerated in pts with previously treated advanced HCC in the Phase 2 RATIONALE-208 study (NCT03419897). At the time of this study, SOR and LEN were recommended first-line treatments for pts with advanced HCC and continue to have an important role in the first-line treatment of HCC despite the recent approval of new immuno-oncology-based combinations (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) in some regions. We report the clinical outcomes of pts with advanced HCC who were previously treated with SOR/LEN. Methods: Pts who had received ≥ 1 prior line of systemic therapy for advanced HCC received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks. Objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) (ORRIRC), duration of response by IRC (DORIRC), progression-free survival by IRC (PFSIRC), overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated in pts who had been previously treated with SOR/LEN. Results: As of February 2020, 249 pts were enrolled and 235 pts had received prior treatment with SOR/LEN, of whom 126 and 109 pts had received 1 or ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, respectively. At study entry, 211 (89.8%) pts had BCLC stage C and 187 (79.6%) pts had extrahepatic spread. Median follow-up duration for pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 12.5 months and ORRIRC was 13.6% (95% CI: 9.5, 18.7), including 2 complete responses and 30 partial responses. Median DORIRC was not reached. Median PFSIRC and OS of pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.6, 2.8) and 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.9, 15.8), respectively. Tislelizumab was generally well tolerated in pts previously treated with SOR/LEN (Table), and the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=70; 28.1%) and alanine aminotransferase (n=52; 20.9%). Conclusions: Tislelizumab was investigated beyond the first-line setting, as effective second- and third-line treatment options are limited for pts with advanced HCC and there is an unmet medical need. This analysis indicates that tislelizumab is clinically active and well tolerated in pts with advanced HCC who have received prior systemic treatment with SOR/LEN. Clinical trial information: NCT03419897. [Table: see text]

A real-world study of prognostic factors and risk-stratification model from Taiwanese patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with cetuximab containing regimen

e18013

Background: Cetuximab significantly improved survival outcomes of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) when combined with chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to explore clinical outcomes, prognostic factors, and risk stratification model for R/M HNSCC patients who received cetuximab-containing regimens based on a real-world, multicenter Taiwanese patient cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 12 oncology institutions in Taiwan. All R/M HNSCC patients who received cetuximab-containing regimens from January 2017 to December 2020 were included in this study. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate/ multivariate analysis. The factors that showed significant differences (p < 0.05) were selected to establish the prediction model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained to select cut-off values as a reference for continuous variables. The risk score system incorporated both continuous and categorical factors. The score was determined according to hazard ratio. Results: A total of 818 R/M HNSCC patients were included in this study. Patient characteristics were as following: median age, 56 years; performance status (PS) 0/1/≧2, 16.0%/70.4%/13.3%; oral/ oropharynx/ hypopharynx/ larynx/ others, 51.5%/17.5%/19.7%/6.4%/5.0%; stage at initial diagnosis (AJCC8), 0/I/II/III/IVA/IVB/IVC/unknown, 0.2%/5.9%/8.1%/7.1%/ 35.5%/18.0%/6.7%/18.6%; locoregional recurrence/ distant metastasis/ unknown, 38.4%/ 56.0%/ 5.6%; site of distant metastasis, lung/ distant lymph node/ bone/ liver/ skin/ brain, 60.3%/ 37.1%/ 18.8%/ 6.3%/ 8.1%/ 3.3%; cetuximab-PF/ cetuximab-non-PF regimen, 56.6%/ 43.4%. The median overall survival (mOS) was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1-10.9 months). Multivariate analysis disclosed poor prognostic factors on OS, including poor PS, smoking history, R2 resection of primary surgery, present distant metastasis at bone, cetuximab combined with non-PF regimen. In addition, HB and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were shown to have significant difference between treatment responders and non-responders (inc. SD pts). Risk-stratification model was established including factors: PS, smoking history, bone metastasis, hemoglobin level, and NLR. The mOS of the three risk groups stratified from the prediction model were 13.0/7.0/4.0 months (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Poor prognostic factors for R/M HNSCC treated with cetuximab-based regimens includes poor PS, smoking history, R2 resection of primary surgery, bone metastasis, and non-PF regimen. In this study, the risk-stratification model for cetuximab-based treatment was established using some of the identified prognostic factors help to predict the overall survival for R/M HNSCC patients.

AdvanTIG-206: Anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb) ociperlimab (BGB-A1217; OCI) plus anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) mAb tislelizumab (TIS) plus BAT1706 versus TIS plus BAT1706 as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

TPS4172

Background: Treatment with PD-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents has demonstrated significant survival improvements in patients with untreated HCC. T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT) is a co-inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor upregulated on T cells and natural killer cells in multiple solid tumors. OCI is a novel, humanized mAb that binds TIGIT with high specificity and affinity, blocking interaction with its ligands on tumor cells. TIS is an anti-PD-1 mAb that has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with previously treated, unresectable HCC (NCT03419897). BAT1706 is a similar biological product to the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab. OCI combined with TIS and BAT1706 could further enhance both anti-angiogenic and anti-PD-1 therapies for patients with HCC. Methods: AdvanTIG-206 is a Phase 2, randomized, open-label clinical study (NCT04948697). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed advanced HCC that is not amenable to a curative treatment approach are eligible. Patients must have a Child-Pugh A score, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and have received no prior systemic therapy for HCC. Approximately 90 patients will be randomized 2:1 to OCI 900 mg combined with TIS 200 mg plus BAT1706 15 mg/kg (Arm A) or TIS 200 mg plus BAT1706 15 mg/kg (Arm B), all administered intravenously (once every 3 weeks [Q3W]). The primary endpoint is objective response rate as assessed by the investigator (RECIST v1.1). Radiological assessment of tumor response status will be performed Q6W for the first 48 weeks and Q12W thereafter. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, time to response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and progression-free survival (all by investigator’s assessment), overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Study enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04948697.

Effect of previous conventional irinotecan treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer being treated with liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested the suboptimal efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan. This study investigated the effect of conventional irinotecan treatment in mPDAC patients receiving nal-IRI+5-FU/LV by analyzing a population-based dataset.

METHODS

We reviewed 667 consecutive mPDAC patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV between August 2018 and November 2020 at Taiwanese medical centers. Eighty-six patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan were matched to 86 patients not treated with conventional irinotecan, following propensity matching for age, sex, performance status, metastatic organ site, pre-treatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, lines of prior chemotherapy treatment, and time from first-line treatment to nal-IRI+5-FU/LV therapy.

RESULTS

The median overall survival and time-to-treatment failure were 4.8 and 2.6 vs 4.1 and 2.1 months, respectively, for patients who were and were not previously treated with conventional irinotecan. The tumor response and disease control rates were 5.8% and 32.6% vs 5.8% and 37.2%, respectively, for patients previously treated and not treated with conventional irinotecan. No significant differences were observed in survival times and tumor response rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous conventional irinotecan treatment does not compromise the efficacy of subsequent nal-IRI+5-FU/LV treatment in mPDAC patients.

Improved survival with induction chemotherapy and conversion surgery in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: a single institution experience

Both efficacy and tolerability are critical issues in choosing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The optimal regimen and the impact of conversion surgery on patient survival remains insufficiently reported in Asain population. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study aiming to evaluate the resection rate after different induction chemotherapy regimen and its impact toward survival. All patients with pancreatic cancer treated in our institute from 2013 to 2020, a total of 730 patients, were reviewed and 131 patients with LAPC were identified. For cohort homogeneity, 14 patients receiving induction concurrent chemoradiotherapy initially were excluded and 117 patients receiving induction chemotherapy were included in the study. Most patients (90 of 117, 77%) received triplet induction chemotherapy, including the combination of S1, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine (SLOG) in 48, modified FOLFIRINOX in 21 and the combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin (GOFL) in 21. The tumor response rate (19%-33%), the surgical exploration rate (38%-52%) and the mOS (15.4-23.0 months) were not significantly different among the three triplets. Both GOFL and SLOG regimen had comparable efficacy and less neutropenia as compared to mFOLFIRINOX. Conversion surgery was performed in 34 of 117 (29%) patients after induction chemotherapy. The median overall survival (mOS) in patients with and without conversion surgery were 29.1 and 14.1 months, respectively (P<0.0001). Radiological response alone was not a reliable indicator of successful conversion surgery. Patients who underwent conversion surgery had significantly better survival and thus highlighted the importance of surgical exploration in all patients who did not have progressive disease after induction chemotherapy.

The Serum Hepatitis B Virus Large Surface Protein as High-Risk Recurrence Biomarker for Hepatoma after Curative Surgery

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection is the most important cause of HCC and is also associated with tumor progression. The development of viral biomarkers for HCC prognosis is critical in evaluating relative risks to recurrence in the CHB HCC patients. We report that the large HBV surface protein (LHBS) expression increased in the tumors, implicating that it played a significant role in tumor development. To detect the LHBS in serum and evaluate its association with HCC progression, we developed a sandwich ELISA method for LHBS. The mouse monoclonal antibodies for the pre-S1, pre-S2, and HBS regions were in-house generated and constructed into a chemiluminescent sandwich ELISA system, which allowed sensitive and quantitative measurement of the protein. Using this ELISA assay, we estimated the expression of LHBS in CHB and HCC patients. We found that the serum LHBS level was correlated with the HBS but not the viral titer in serum, indicating that HBV surface proteins’ expression does not mainly depend on viral replication. Moreover, both serum LHBS and HBS levels were lower in the HCC patients than in the CHB. The liver LHBS signals, detected by immunohistochemical staining, showed significant correlations with the serum LHBS and HBS levels. In addition, the more elevated serum LHBS but not HBS level was significantly associated with cirrhosis and worse disease-free and overall survival rates, based on the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: LHBS plays a specific role in tumor progression and is an independent parameter associated with HCC recurrence. Serum LHBS represents a novel noninvasive biomarker for HCC patients with a worse prognosis after surgery.

The impact of spleen volume on the survival of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients receiving nanoliposomal irinotecan

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (NalFL) comprises the current standard for gemcitabine-failed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). As liposomes generally accumulate in the spleen, we evaluated the impact of spleen volume on prognosis. We enrolled patients with metastatic PDAC who failed gemcitabine-based therapy and were initiated on NalFL between August 2018 and November 2020. The spleen volume before NalFL administration was evaluated. They were stratified into dose subgroups (i.e. low, < 48 mg/m2; intermediate, 48 - < 64 mg/m2; high, ≥ 64 mg/m2) by the average nal-IRI dose during the entire treatment, and multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) was performed. We included 547 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 27-89 years) and a median of 1 (range, 0-7) palliative chemotherapy regimen. The median spleen volume was 245 mL (range, 82-817 mL). Among patients with splenomegaly (≥ 245 mL), the low-dose subgroup had the worst median time to treatment failure (TTF, 1.8 months vs. 2.5 months vs. 2.5 months, P = 0.020) and OS (3.3 months vs. 5.9 months vs. 6.6 months, P = 0.018) as against no prognostic impact in patients without splenomegaly. In the multivariate analysis of patients with splenomegaly, performance status (PS) ≥ 2, body surface area (BSA) < 1.6 m2, prior fluoropyrimidine use, liver metastasis, and low-dose subgroup were independent poor prognostic factors. A low average nal-IRI dose was significantly associated with poor prognosis, especially among patients with splenomegaly. Further pharmacological studies should validate the relevance of spleen volume on the treatment outcomes of nal-IRI.

Clinical outcomes associated with tislelizumab in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib (SOR) or lenvatinib (LEN) in RATIONALE-208

420

Background: Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated clinical activity and was well tolerated in pts with previously treated advanced HCC in the phase 2 RATIONALE-208 study (NCT03419897). At the time of this study, SOR and LEN were recommended first-line treatments for pts with advanced HCC and continue to have an important role in the first-line treatment of HCC despite the recent approval of new immuno-oncology-based combinations (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) in some regions. We report the clinical outcomes of pts with advanced HCC who were previously treated with SOR/LEN. Methods: Pts who had received ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy for advanced HCC received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks. Objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) (ORRIRC), duration of response by IRC (DORIRC), progression-free survival by IRC (PFSIRC), overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated in pts who had been previously treated with SOR/LEN. Results: As of February 2020, 249 pts were enrolled and 235 pts had received prior treatment with SOR/LEN, of whom 126 and 109 pts had received 1 or ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, respectively. At study entry, 211 (89.8%) pts had BCLC stage C and 187 (79.6%) pts had extrahepatic spread. Median follow-up duration for pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 12.5 months and ORRIRC was 13.6% (95% CI: 9.5, 18.7), including 2 complete responses and 30 partial responses. Median DORIRC was not reached. Median PFSIRC and OS of pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.6, 2.8) and 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.9, 15.8), respectively. Tislelizumab was generally well tolerated in pts previously treated with SOR/LEN (Table), and the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=70; 28.1%) and alanine aminotransferase (n=52; 20.9%). Conclusions: Tislelizumab was investigated beyond the first-line setting, as effective second- and third-line treatment options are limited for pts with advanced HCC and there is an unmet medical need. This analysis indicates that tislelizumab is clinically active and well tolerated in pts with advanced HCC who have received prior systemic treatment with SOR/LEN. Clinical trial information: NCT03419897. [Table: see text]

AdvanTIG-206: Anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb) ociperlimab (BGB-A1217; OCI) plus anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) mAb tislelizumab (TIS) plus BAT1706 versus (vs) TIS plus BAT1706 as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

TPS488

Background: Treatment with PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents has demonstrated significant survival improvements in patients with untreated HCC. T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT) is a co-inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor upregulated on T cells and natural killer cells in multiple solid tumors. OCI is a novel, humanized mAb that binds TIGIT with high specificity and affinity, blocking interaction with its ligands on tumor cells. TIS is an anti-PD-1 mAb that has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with previously treated, unresectable HCC (NCT03419897). BAT1706 is a similar biological product to the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab. OCI combined with TIS and BAT1706 could further enhance both anti-angiogenic and anti-PD-1 therapies for patients with HCC. Methods: AdvanTIG-206 is a phase 2, randomized, open-label clinical study (NCT04948697). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed advanced HCC that is not amenable to a curative treatment approach are eligible. Patients must have a Child-Pugh A score, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and have received no prior systemic therapy for HCC. Approximately 90 patients will be randomized 2:1 to OCI 900 mg combined with TIS 200 mg plus BAT1706 15 mg/kg (Arm A) or TIS 200 mg plus BAT1706 15 mg/kg (Arm B), all administered intravenously (once every 3 weeks [Q3W]). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Radiological assessment of tumor response status will be performed Q6W for the first 48 weeks and Q12W thereafter. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, time to response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and progression-free survival (all investigator-assessed overall survival), safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Study enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04948697.

Safety of ramucirumab treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-induced deaths worldwide, and limited therapeutic options are available for patients with advanced disease. Ramucirumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2, is the first biomarker-selected systemic agent with therapeutic efficacy, tolerability, and favorable patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced HCC and elevated serum α-fetoprotein levels ≥400 ng/mL, who are resistant or intolerant to sorafenib therapy. However, treatment-induced adverse events (AEs), such as hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, thromboembolism, and gastrointestinal perforation remain challenging and potentially fatal concerns.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the published or ongoing studies and subgroup analyses on ramucirumab therapy in patients with advanced HCC. We present information on the risks of ramucirumab-induced common or rare AEs and their management.

EXPERT OPINION

Ramucirumab toxicity secondary to VEGF inhibition is similar to the AEs that are known to be associated with other VEGF-blocking antibodies. Common AEs can be safely treated using conventional measures; however, rare and potentially fatal AEs necessitate close monitoring. With regard to the safety profile, more promising ramucirumab-containing combination therapies are likely to pave the future path for effective HCC treatment.

Liposomal irinotecan pre-emptive dose reduction in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: 667 patients' experience within a population-based study

Background:

Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is currently the standard second-line treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after previous failed gemcitabine-based therapy. This population-based study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and the association of pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing with treatment outcomes in patients with PDAC.

Methods:

We retrospectively enrolled a total of 667 consecutive patients with PDAC who received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV treatment between August 2018 and November 2020 at 9 medical centers in Taiwan. Patients were allocated into groups according to pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing (⩾75%, 50–74%, <50%) for comparison of treatment efficacy and safety.

Results:

The median overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 5.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3–6.5] and 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6–3.0), respectively. The median OS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.7–6.7), 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.4–6.5), and 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.7–5.6), respectively, among the ⩾75%, 50–74%, and <50% pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing groups, whereas the median TTF of the three groups was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6–3.4), 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.3–2.9), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.2), respectively. Pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing <50% was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and TTF in multivariate analyses. The most common severe adverse events were neutropenia (22.9%), anemia (21.1%), and hypokalemia (15.4%). Patients in the <50% pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia and non-neutropenic infection than those in the other groups.

Conclusion:

Our results support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard clinical practice for treating patients with PDAC based on this large population-based study. Our findings encourage physicians to provide adequate doses of nal-IRI in order to achieve better outcomes without compromising safety profiles.

435 Pegasus HNSCC, a platform study of SAR444245 (THOR-707, a pegylated recombinant non-alpha IL-2) with anti-cancer agents in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background

SAR444245 (THOR-707) is a recombinant human IL-2 molecule that includes a PEG moiety irreversibly bound to a novel amino acid via click chemistry to block the alpha-binding domain while retaining near-native affinity for the beta/gamma subunits. In animal models, SAR444245 showed anti-tumor benefits, but with no severe side effects, both as single agent and when combined with anti-PD1 comparing with historical data from aldeslukin. Preclinical study demonstrated SAR444245 enhances ADCC function of cetuximab. The HAMMER trial, which is the FIH study shows preliminary encouraging clinical results: initial efficacy and safety profile with SAR444245 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab or with cetuximab support a non-alpha preferential activity, validating preclinical models. The Pegasus Head and Neck Ph 2 study will evaluate the clinical benefit of SAR444245 in combination with other anticancer therapies for the treatment of patients with R/M HNSCC.

Methods

The Pegasus Head and Neck will enroll approximately 272 patients in 4 separate cohorts concurrently. In cohorts A1 & A2, 1L R/M HNSCC patients will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab, or SAR444245+ pembrolizumab+ cetuximab respectively. In cohort B1 & B2 patients with 2/3L R/M HNSCC failed a checkpoint based regimen & a platinum containing regimen will receive SAR444245 + pembrolizumab, or SAR444245 + cetuximab. Patients to be enrolled in cohort B2 need to be cetuximab-naïve in R/M setting. SAR444245 is administered intravenously IV at a dose of 24 ug/kg Q3W until disease progression (PD) or completion of 35 cycles. Pembrolizumab is administered at a dose of 200 mg Q3W until PD or completion of 35 cycles. Cetuximab is administered at a dose of 400/250 mg/m2 QW until PD. The study primary objective is to determine the antitumor activity of SAR444245 in combination with other anticancer therapies. Secondary objectives include confirmation of dose and safety profile, assess other indicators of antitumor activity, and assess the pharmacokinetic profile and immunogenicity of SAR444245. The study will be conducted in the US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Spain and Taiwan.

Acknowledgements

The Pegasus Head and Neck study is sponsored by Sanofi.

CPAP enhances and maintains chronic inflammation in hepatocytes to promote hepatocarcinogenesis

Chronic and persistent inflammation is a well-known carcinogenesis promoter. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common inflammation-associated cancers; most HCCs arise in the setting of chronic inflammation and hepatic injury. Both NF-κB and STAT3 are important regulators of inflammation. Centrosomal P4.1-associated protein (CPAP), a centrosomal protein that participates primarily in centrosome functions, is overexpressed in HCC and can increase TNF-α-mediated NF-κB activation and IL-6-induced STAT3 activation. A transgenic (Tg) mouse model with hepatocyte-specific CPAP expression was established to investigate the physiological role of CPAP in hepatocarcinogenesis. Obvious inflammatory cell accumulation and fatty change were observed in the livers of CPAP Tg mice. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and the expression levels of inflammatory genes, such as IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α, were higher in CPAP Tg mice than in wild type (WT) mice. High-dose/short-term treatment with diethylnitrosamine (DEN) increased the ALT level, proinflammatory gene expression levels, and STAT3 and NF-κB activation in CPAP Tg mice; low-dose/long-term DEN treatment induced more severe liver tumor formation in CPAP Tg mice than in WT mice. CPAP can increase the expression of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 16 (CCL-16), an important chemotactic cytokine, in human hepatocytes. CCL-16 expression is positively correlated with CPAP and TNF-α mRNA expression in the peritumoral part of HCC. In summary, these results suggest that CPAP may promote hepatocarcinogenesis through enhancing the inflammation pathway via increasing the expression of CCL-16.