The eye-tracking computer device for communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness of communication and the variables affecting the eye-tracking computer system (ETCS) utilization in patients with late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

METHODS

We performed a telephone survey on 30 patients with advanced non-demented ALS that were provisioned an ECTS device. Median age at interview was 55 years (IQR = 48-62), with a relatively high education (13 years, IQR = 8-13). A one-off interview was made and answers were later provided with the help of the caregiver. The interview included items about demographic and clinical variables affecting the daily ETCS utilization.

RESULTS

The median time of ETCS device possession was 15 months (IQR = 9-20). The actual daily utilization was 300 min (IQR = 100-720), mainly for the communication with relatives/caregiver, internet surfing, e-mailing, and social networking. 23.3% of patients with ALS (n = 7) had a low daily ETCS utilization; most reported causes were eye-gaze tiredness and oculomotor dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Eye-tracking computer system is a valuable device for AAC in patients with ALS, and it can be operated with a good performance. The development of oculomotor impairment may limit its functional use.

Rituximab for treatment of inhibitors in haemophilia A. A Phase II study

The development of antibodies against infused factor VIII (FVIII) in patients with haemophilia A is a serious complication leading to poorly controlled bleeding and increased morbidity. No treatment has been proven to reduce high titre antibodies in patients who fail immune tolerance induction or are not candidates for it. The Rituximab for the Treatment of Inhibitors in Congenital Hemophilia A (RICH) study was a phase II trial to assess whether rituximab can reduce anamnestic FVIII antibody (inhibitor) titres. Male subjects with severe congenital haemophilia A and an inhibitor titre ≥5 Bethesda Units/ml (BU) following a FVIII challenge infusion received rituximab 375 mg/m² weekly for weeks 1 through 4. Post-rituximab inhibitor titres were measured monthly from week 6 through week 22 to assess treatment response. Of 16 subjects who received at least one dose of rituximab, three (18.8%) met the criteria for a major response, defined as a fall in inhibitor titre to <5 BU, persisting after FVIII re-challenge. One subject had a minor response, defined as a fall in inhibitor titre to <5 BU, increasing to 5-10 BU after FVIII re-challenge, but <50% of the original peak inhibitor titre. Rituximab is useful in lowering inhibitor levels in patients, but its effect as a solo treatment strategy is modest. Future studies are indicated to determine the role of rituximab as an adjunctive therapy in immune tolerisation strategies.

Bone morphogenetic protein-2 may represent the molecular link between oxidative stress and vascular stiffness in chronic kidney disease

Oxidative stress and vascular calcifications are emergent risk factors for the accelerated atherosclerosis process featuring chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vascular calcification is an active process similar to bone modelling, where BMP-2 may play a pathogenic role. Aim of our study was to investigate the link between oxidative stress, BMP-2 protein expression and vascular disease in CKD. We enrolled 85 CKD patients (K-DOQI stage II or higher) and 41 healthy individuals. 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) was used as a marker of oxidative stress. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was used as a measure of arterial stiffness. BMP-2 serum levels were significantly higher in CKD patients than in controls (p<0.0001). Serum 8-OHdG levels were significantly higher in CKD patients compared to controls (p<0.05). BMP-2 serum levels were inversely associated with eGFR (r=-0.3; p=0.01) and directly correlated with 8-OHdG serum concentrations (r=-0.3; p=0.03). Arterial stiffness was inversely correlated with eGFR (r=-0.4; p=0.001) and directly correlated with BMP-2 (r=0.3; p=0.03), 8-OHdG (r=0.4, p=0.02) and phosphorus serum levels (r=0.3; p=0.007). In a multiple regression model, phosphorus and BMP-2 were independently correlated with baPWV. In vitro exposure to H(2)O(2) induced a time and dose-dependent increase in BMP-2 expression in an immortalized endothelial cell line. Moreover, H(2)O(2) pre-incubation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cell enhanced the BMP-2-induced up-regulation of ALPL, an osteoblastic phenotype marker. Our data suggest that in CKD BMP-2 may represent the molecular link between oxidative stress and arterial stiffness due to vascular calcification.

[The usefulness of Cochrane systematic reviews in nephrology]

Systematic reviews (SRs) of the literature are clinical research studies carried out according to rigorous methodological criteria. They are aimed at searching, critically appraising and summarizing all studies with similar characteristics that address the same research question. The Cochrane Collaboration is the main institution that coordinates the production of SRs. The Cochrane Renal Group is one of the 50 research groups of the Cochrane Collaboration and is in charge of SRs in nephrology. This group compiled the Renal Health Library, an annually updated collection of SRs (Cochrane and not) and randomized controlled trials in nephrology, dialysis and renal transplantation. We searched the Renal Health Library to identify SRs useful to answer clinical questions in patients with renal disease and/or following kidney transplant. The SRs identified were summarized and the results were expressed as relative risk, weighted mean difference, standardized mean difference, and 95% confidence intervals. Since the number of randomized controlled trials is quite large and SRs are a reliable summary of the scientific evidence, their distribution is of paramount importance. Here we show several clinical cases where related SRs in the Renal Health Library provide useful guidance for treatment.

[Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease]

Assessment of quality of life in patients with different degrees of chronic kidney disease is an important issue because of its impact on clinical decisions and financial resource management in the health-care system. The aim of this study was to assess whether a generic instrument like the SF-36 questionnaire is able to discriminate three different populations of patients with different degrees of renal disease (pre-ESRD, ESRD, TxR). Five hundred sixty-three patients from 12 Italian nephrology units completed the SF-36 scales by themselves. The results from these samples were compared with those from the general population. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression were used. The generic SF-36 questionnaire proved to be a powerful instrument to discriminate populations with different degrees of chronic renal failure. The quality of life of patients on dialysis is significantly worse than that of the normal population and other patients with less severe renal function impairment.

[Evidence-based guidelines and nephrological clinical practice: the GRADE system for rating of evidence]

It has become widely accepted that decision-making should be based on the best available evidence. The preparation of evidence-based guidelines in the interest of improving long-term outcomes has been a challenging task for many societies. Although nephrology is a relatively young medical discipline and therefore presumably well-disposed towards evidence-based decision making, many problems exist and evidence-based approaches to guidelines have also been widely criticized. One key issue has been the availability of only few and suboptimal randomized trials in this discipline. Considerable variation in the grading systems used to assess existing evidence in nephrology guidelines highlights the need for a better tool. Tools that rigidly assess existing evidence need to also explore the applicability to current practice. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system, developed and implemented in 2004 by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines panel, is the most advanced tool in this direction.

[Patient satisfaction in hemodialysis: a pilot cross-sectional analysis and a review]

BACKGROUND

Assessment of patient satisfaction is not performed routinely in many healthcare institutions. In this review, we discuss methodological aspects of assessment of patient satisfaction in hemodialysis. We also present a pilot study conducted in the Gambro Healthcare Italy dialysis clinics network.

METHODS

Patient satisfaction was assessed in a network of hemodialysis units by using an internally validated Italian translation of the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD (CHOICE) questionnaire. A cross-sectional analytic study design was used and data analysed with univariate and multivariate hierarchical logistic regression to explore correlates of the risk of being unsatisfied with dialysis treatment. Covariates which were considered include a series of over 20 clinical, demographic, organizational and structural aspects. In addition, unexplained inter-centre residual variability due to 'case-mix' was explored and plotted.

RESULTS

Seventeen dialysis units participated in this cross-sectional analysis and 758/1001 (75.7%) provided answers to the questionnaires. There was a statistically significant association on multivariate hierarchical analysis between the risk of being unsatisfied with dialysis treatment and interdialysis body weight gain (unit of increase: 1 kg, p=0.004). On the contrary, the risk of unsatisfaction with dialysis treatment was significantly lower in patients with higher dry weight (unit of increase: 1 kg, p=0.002). Our multivariate hierarchical analysis identified some residual variability between dialysis units (n=6 outliers) which may not be explained by any of over 20 potential confounding covariates which were explored.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of ''customer satisfaction'' is standard practice in private for profit product companies in general but needs to be increasingly recognized as a standard in both public and private providers of healthcare services. Social research methods, which are used for this type of analysis, need to be fine tuned and actively implemented in order to better understand how we may influence the quality of service we provide to our patients and the level at which they rate it.

[Antihypertensive agents for the prevention of chronic kidney disease progression: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]

BACKGROUND

The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of the use of antihypertensive agents to prevent chronic kidney disease progression (CKD) is presented.

METHODS

SR of RCT and RCT on antihypertensive agents used to prevent CKD progression were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update).

RESULTS

Seven SR and 26 further RCT were found addressing this intervention issue. Methodological quality of available RCT was suboptimal according to current methodological standards. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are associated with significant effects on the prevention of CKD progression in non-diabetic and diabetic patients (evidence from SR). Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are as effective as ACE-I in delaying CKD progression in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (evidence from SR). Dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists have not been found to significantly affect proteinuria and CKD progression (evidence from SR). Combination therapy with ACE-I and ARB is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of CKD progression and proteinuria, but long term data are only available in patients with non-diabetic nephropathy (evidence from RCT).

CONCLUSION

Available evidence of renal protection suggest that ACE-I and ARB should be recommended in CKD patients (diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy). Further studies are necessary to test the effectiveness of other antihypertensive agents or combination therapy.

[Corticosteroid treatment for a first episode of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) in children: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]

BACKGROUND

The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of the use of corticosteroid treatment for a first episode of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) in children is presented.

METHODS

SR of RCT and RCT on SSNS therapeutic interventions were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). Results. One SR including 15 RCT was available on this topic. Methodological quality of available RCT was suboptimal according to current methodological standards.

RESULTS

In children with a first episode of SSNS, corticosteroids administered for 3 months or more compared with 2 months' administration are associated with a significant reduction in the risk of relapse at 6, 12 and 24 months, and in frequent relapsing rates, even though complications did not seem significantly increased (psychological, ocular, gastrointestinal disorders, hypertension, growth delay, Cushingoid syndrome, infection and osteoporosis) (evidence from SR). 6-month compared to 3-month treatment regimens are associated with a significant reduction in the risk of relapse at 12-24 months (evidence from SR). Increasing steroids cumulative doses are associated with increasing improvements in the risk of relapse (evidence from RCT). The risk of relapse at 12-24 months correlates inversely with duration of treatment (evidence from SR).

CONCLUSION

In SSNS children, current available evidence supports the hypothesis that primary intervention should be a high dose of corticosteroids administered for 3 months or more. Further studies are necessary to test this hypothesis in adult patients.

[Treating lupus nephritis: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]

BACKGROUND

The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of lupus nephritis (LN) treatment is presented.

METHODS

SR of RCT and RCT on different therapeutic options for LN were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update).

RESULTS

One SR of 25 RCT and 6 further RCT were available to address this issue. Methodological quality of available RCT was suboptimal according to current methodological standards. In LN patients, combining cyclophosphamide (CyA) and steroids as induction therapy results in a reduced risk of serum creatinine doubling compared to steroids alone, although there is no evidence of significant survival advantage and risk of ovarian failure was demonstrated (evidence from SR). The association of azathioprine (Aza) and steroids significantly reduces the risk of all-cause mortality compared to steroids alone (evidence from SR). No significant survival advantages from the association of plasma exchange and CyA or Aza are proven (evidence from SR). No significant differences on renal and survival endpoints are demonstrated with different dosing of CyA (evidence from RCT).

CONCLUSION

In LN patients available evidence supports the hypothesis that immunosuppressive agents reduce the risk of all-cause mortality and the risk of progressive renal disease. Further studies are necessary to test new immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil in severe LN patients.

[Therapeutic strategies for membranous nephropathy: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]

BACKGROUND

The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of interventions for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN) is presented.

METHODS

SR of RCT and RCT on interventions for MN were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update).

RESULTS

Three SR and 18 RCT were available to address this issue. Methodological quality of available RCT was suboptimal according to current methodological standards. In patients with MN, nephrotic syndrome and normal renal function, methylprednisolone and chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide for 6 months alternately increase the probability of nephritic syndrome remission (evidence from SR) and long-term renal protection (evidence from RCT). Other drugs (ACTH and cyclosporine) are associated with nephrotic syndrome remission, but there is no evidence of significant effects on renal function (evidence from RCT). In patients with impaired renal function, association of corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents is proven to cause a short-term delay of renal damage progression, even though benefits are counterbalanced by complications (evidence from RCT).

CONCLUSION

In patients with MN, nephrotic syndrome and normal renal function, current available evidence supports the hypothesis that primary intervention should be the association of corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents. Secondary therapeutic choices include ACTH and cyclosporine. Further studies are necessary to test new immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil.

[Immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive agents for patients with IgA nephropathy: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]

BACKGROUND

The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of the use of immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive treatments in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is presented.

METHODS

SR of RCT and RCT on treatment in patients with IgAN were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). Quality of SR and RCT was assessed according to current methodological standards.

RESULTS

Two SR of RCT (13 and 3 RCT, respectively), and 18 further RCT were available to address this issue. Methodological quality of available trials was suboptimal. In patients with IgAN and normal or mildly impaired renal function, steroids significantly delay the progression to end stage kidney disease (evidence from SR) and improve proteinuria. Associating steroids and cytotoxic agents (cyclophosphamide followed by oral azathioprine) proves effective in patients with rapidly progressive renal disease (evidence from RCT). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers significantly improve proteinuria (evidence from RCT), but there are no conclusive data on efficacy on hard patient level endpoints. There are no conclusive data available on the use of a therapy combining these agents.

CONCLUSION

In IgAN patients current evidence supports the hypothesis that immunosuppressive agents delay the progression to end stage renal disease. Further studies are necessary to test this hypothesis in selected patient populations.

[The Italian Society of Nephrology Guidelines (3rd Edition): principles and methods]

Scientific Societies at both a local and international level are making big effort to prepare their clinical practice guidelines. The Italian Society of Nephrology has already published in two previous editions a series of guidelines relating to various aspects of management and diagnosis of different renal diseases. In this review we present the criteria of the 3(rd) edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines. This 3(rd) edition of guidelines will be based on the availability of scientific evidence in different areas of nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. Ten key intervention questions have been identified, based on the availability of systematic reviews of randomized trials or individual randomized address them. Systematic reviews and randomized trials are the optimal study design to address intervention questions. These have been summarized based upon rigid methodological criteria and strictly reflect the evidence basis. The different phases of development and publication of the 3(rd) edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines are presented.

[Update of the Italian Society of Nephrology Project No. 1 of the 2004-2006 SIN programme]

In the last few years the Italian Society of Nephrology has addressed many technical-scientific and management aspects to better patient satisfaction. Project No. 1 of the 2004-2006 programme on 'Quality and Accreditation of National Renal Units' focuses on four essential points. The first is the questionnaire mailed to all the Presidents and Regional Delegates on the relationship between Nephrology units, Local Government Health-System and the Regional Healthcare Agency. The results evidence that the 'political' decision-making power of nephrologists decreases in the absence of a national strategy. The second point, in collaboration with the National Census Group, includes the quality analysis and the standardization of resources (human and structural) and management of the Renal Units. The third point is based on 'Educational Courses for Quality and Accreditation' held in Rome (3-5 October 2005: L'Accreditamento all'Eccellenza dell'Unita' Operativa di Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto; 17-19 October 2005: Il Manuale di Accreditamento della Specialità di Nefrologia). The courses aim at training members responsible for each region to hold courses in their specific region to create a network including each single Renal Unit to create an acceptable homogenous language on the models of analysis and on the correct use of 'The Guide for Excellence Accreditation'. The fourth point concerns both the on-line Guide for Excellence Accreditation and 'Peer Review Accreditation' and the NEQUASY (Nephrology Quality System) project. The manual must be 'user friendly' allowing each Centre to self-evaluate using national and regional standards.

Considerations in the evaluation of haemophilia patients for short-term prophylactic therapy: a paediatric and adult case study

The long-term prophylactic administration of clotting factor concentrate in patients with haemophilia reduces bleeding events, slows joint deterioration, and improves quality of life. Prophylaxis can also be effective when used short-term to prevent or reduce bleeding associated with trauma, surgery, and athletic activities. While clinical trials are needed to establish the optimal length of prophylaxis following injury, several weeks and possibly months of treatment may be needed. Discontinuing therapy prematurely can result in rebleeding in the injured area.

[Evidence-based guidelines in nephrology]

INTRODUCTION

The preparation of evidence-based guidelines by the Nephrology Societies is fundamental to improve long-term outcomes of patients with chronic kidney diseases. However, this is a complex process and requires the interaction of clinicians and experts in epidemiology methods, and researchers and research enterprises.

METHODS

In this review, we present the potential structure of a body for the coordination and development of evidence-based guidelines in a nephrology society and we address the major problems that can arise in this process describing strategies that could be used to overcome them.

RESULTS

The development of evidence-based nephrology guidelines requires a structure; this should consist of a coordinating center and a number of working groups. The working groups is to identify specific research questions and to develop and synthetize the evidence in answer to the questions proposed. This shall be done in collaboration with the coordinating center. Draft guidelines produced by this process should be peer reviewed, disseminated and implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of evidence-based nephrology guidelines is a challenge for individual nephrology societies. These guidelines are different from typical research publications in that their success does not lie in the final publication, but in the actual dissemination and implementation, which is in the improvement of patient outcomes and its measurement.

[Quality guide in nephrology and dialysis]

The Quality Guide, a strategic tool for any nephrologist wishing to initiate a quality policy in his own renal unit, describes to the organisation of total quality management. This article gives a short description of a Quality Guide in Nephrology and Dialysis. According to ISO 9004:2000 Norms, the Quality Guide can be subdivided into four sections: Managerial Accountability, Resource Management; Implementation of Services; Analysis, Evaluation and Continuous Quality Improvement. The quality cycle begins by identifying the customers, who added to the resources constitute the input that will be transformed by the service into output (results). By measuring customer satisfaction the results will be evaluated and analyzed to allow continuous improvement of the service. In conclusion, the drafting of the Guide by all staff members involved has a twofold value: it organizes the quality management within the renal unit and certifies the quality level guaranteed to the customer.

[Search strategies for nephrology knowledge and evidence]

The informatic techniques for searching biomedical literature have been one of the fundamental advantages of the era of information explosion. In this review, we focus on some methodologies for searching biomedical literature with particular focus on nephrology and describe the use of PubMed and the techniques for understanding and using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) to search Medline and other databases. Search strategies take advantages of simple search engines which generate informatic algorithms to find relevant articles; alternatively, a set of rules is to be known and represents a more powerful means for identification of selected publications. The latter technique is more useful for researchers seeking relevant information in the literature to prepare systematic reviews. Informatic techniques for searching biomedical literature have represented a fundamental advantage in science. Additional advantage will derive from the use of structured formats in research reporting, with better and quicker readability of retrieved published information, and from the effort of researchers in synthetizing the available published literature.