Pharmacoeconomics of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy

The current burden of allergic diseases, estimated by both direct and indirect costs, is very relevant. In fact the cost estimation for rhinitis amount globally to 4-10 billion dollars/year in the U.S. and to an average annual cost of 1089 euros per child/adolescent and 1543 euros per adult in Europe. The estimated annual costs in Northern America for asthma amounted to 14 billion dollars. Consequently, preventive strategies aimed at reducing the clinical severity of allergy are potentially able to reduce its costs. Among them, specific immunotherapy (SIT) joins to the preventive capacity the carryover effect once treatment is discontinued. A number of studies, mainly conducted in the US and Germany demonstrated a favourable cost-benefit balance. In the nineties, most surveys on patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma reported significant reductions of the direct and indirect costs in subjects treated with SIT compared to those treated with symptomatic drugs. This is fully confirmed in recent studies conducted in European countries: in Denmark the direct cost per patient/year of the standard care was more than halved following SIT; in Italy a study on Parietaria allergic patients demonstrated a significant difference in favor of SIT plus drug treatment for three years versus drug treatment alone, with a cost reduction starting from the 2nd year and increasing to 48% at the 3rd year, with a highly statistical significance which was maintained up to the 6th year, i.e. 3 years after stopping immunotherapy, corresponding to a net saving for each patient at the final evaluation of 623 euros per year; in France a cost/efficacy analysis comparing SIT and current symptomatic treatment in adults and children with dust mite and pollen allergy showed remarkable savings with SIT for both allergies in adults and children.

Practice parameters for sublingual immunotherapy

The efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are currently supported by clinical trials, meta-analysis and post-marketing surveys. Practice parameters for clinical use of SLIT are proposed here by a panel of Italian specialists, with reference to evidence based criteria. Indications to SLIT include allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and isolated conjunctivitis (strength of recommendation: grade A). As to severity of the disease, SLIT is indicated in moderate/severe intermittent rhinitis, persistent rhinitis and mild to moderate asthma (grade D). SLIT may be safely prescribed also in children aged three to five years (grade B), and its use in subjects aged more than 60 years is not prevented when the indications and contraindication are ascertained (grade D). The choice of the allergen to be employed for SLIT should be made in accordance with the combination of clinical history and results of skin prick tests (grade D). Polysensitisation, i.e. the occurrence of multiple positive response does not exclude SLIT, which may be done with the clinically most important allergens (grade D). As to practical administration, co-seasonal, pre co-seasonal, and continuous schedules are available, being the latter recommended for perennial allergens or for pollens with particularly prolonged pollination, such as Parietaria (grade D). For pollens with relatively short pollination, such as grasses and trees (cypress, birch, alder, hazelnut, olive) the pre co-seasonal and perennial schedules are preferred (grade C). The build-up phases suggested by manufacturers can be safely used (grade A), but they can be modified according to the patient's tolerance (grade C). A duration of SLIT of 3-5 years is recommended to ensure a long-lasting clinical effect after the treatment has been terminated (grade C).

Wheat allergy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults

BACKGROUND

Wheat is believed to be an uncommon cause of food allergy in adults; the number of studies that address IgE mediated wheat allergy in adults is all too few.

OBJECTIVE

Determine how many subjects with a history of wheat allergy have real allergy by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge; identify the symptoms manifested during the challenge; determine the lowest provocation dose; determine the performance characteristics of wheat skin prick test and specific IgE; identify subjects with real wheat allergy for potential immunoblotting studies.

METHODS

Patients underwent skin test with commercial wheat extract; specific wheat IgE was determined. Subjects were challenged with 25 g wheat. Subjects who were positive to raw wheat challenge underwent cooked wheat challenge.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven double-blind placebo-controlled wheat challenges were performed on 27 patients. A total of 13 of 27 (48%) patients had a positive result. Eleven subjects with positive raw wheat challenge underwent cooked wheat challenge: 10 were positive. The provocation dose range was 0.1 to 25 g. Twenty-seven percent of the subjects allergic to wheat had a provocation dose that was < or =1.6 g.

CONCLUSION

Wheat causes real food allergy in adults. More than a quarter of the patients allergic to wheat reacted to less than 1.6 g wheat. Specific IgE was more sensitive than skin test for wheat; however, specificity and predictive values were low for both tests. Thus, these tests should not be used to validate diagnosis of wheat allergy.

Screening the allergenic repertoires of wheat and maize with sera from double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge positive patients

BACKGROUND

Food allergy to wheat and maize is an increasing factor of deterioration of life quality, especially childhood and can, in rare cases, even induce anaphylaxis. Although omega-5 gliadin from wheat and maize lipid transfer protein have been characterized as major cereal allergens on the molecular level, the list of food allergens is far to be complete.

METHODS

To identify the IgE-binding repertoires of wheat and maize we screened respective cDNA libraries displayed on phage surface with sera from patients with a confirmed food allergy. The study included six patients with a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to wheat, nine patients with a positive DBPCFC to maize, and six patients with anaphylactic reactions after ingestion of wheat.

RESULTS

The enriched sequences encoding IgE-binding proteins showed heterogeneous repertoires for both, wheat and maize. The selected wheat repertoire yielded 12, the maize repertoire 11 open reading frames. Among these we identified allergens belonging to already characterized allergens families, such as gliadin, profilin and beta-expansin. Besides, we found novel proteins with high cross-reactive potential, such as thioredoxins, as well as sequences that had so far not been related to cereal allergy at all. The IgE-binding capacity of some selected proteins was evaluated in vitro and cross-reactivity was demonstrated by competition ELISA.

CONCLUSION

With regard to the heterogeneity of the characterized sequences as well as to the biochemical nature of the new allergens detected we conclude that wheat and maize-related food allergy is more complex than so far anticipated.

Food allergies and food intolerances

Adverse reactions to foods, aside from those considered toxic, are caused by a particular individual intolerance towards commonly tolerated foods. Intolerance derived from an immunological mechanism is referred to as Food Allergy, the non-immunological form is called Food Intolerance. IgE-mediated food allergy is the most common and dangerous type of adverse food reaction. It is initiated by an impairment of normal Oral Tolerance to food in predisposed individuals (atopic). Food allergy produces respiratory, gastrointestinal, cutaneous and cardiovascular symptoms but often generalized, life-threatening symptoms manifest at a rapid rate-anaphylactic shock. Diagnosis is made using medical history and cutaneous and serological tests but to obtain final confirmation a Double Blind Controlled Food Challenge must be performed. Food intolerances are principally caused by enzymatic defects in the digestive system, as is the case with lactose intolerance, but may also result from pharmacological effects of vasoactive amines present in foods (e.g. Histamine). Prevention and treatment are based on the avoidance of the culprit food.

Cost effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND

Economic evaluations are increasingly relevant in order to provide support for decision makers when judging about alternative ways to allocate public funds. Aim of this study was to evaluate the economic effect of treatment with high dose sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in children.

METHODS

The study involved one allergy center, located in the north of Milan, Italy. From the existing records of patients seen for allergic disease, we extracted all children and adolescents with allergic disease, who had 1-year data prior to receiving SLIT and 3-year data on SLIT. Outcome measures (number of exacerbations, visits, absence from nursery or school), direct costs (euros spent on drugs, specialist visits, SLIT) and indirect costs (costs resulting from children school and parental work loss) were analysed. A second analysis compared a sub-group of allergic asthmatic children with a control group for costs, based on records of patients not SLIT-treated, extracted from a network-database of paediatricians.

RESULTS

135 patients were extracted, of which 46 had perennial, and 89 had seasonal allergy with comparable gender and age distribution. A substantial reduction was found in all outcome measures during SLIT compared with the before period. The average annual cost/patient was 2672 before SLIT initiation and _629/year during SLIT. Similar results were found for allergen subgroups. The asthma sub-analysis involved 41 children with SLIT and 35 controls. Again, SLIT patients showed a substantial reduction in outcome measures; the direct cost/patient over the whole follow-up (4 years) was _1182 for SLIT patients and _1100 for controls.

CONCLUSION

High dose SLIT may be effective in reducing the cost of allergic rhinitis and asthma and comparably expensive to conventional treatment in children with allergic asthma over a 4 years follow-up.

Precocious aging of the immune system in Down syndrome: alteration of B lymphocytes, T-lymphocyte subsets, and cells with natural killer markers

Phenotype and proliferative ability of peripheral blood lymphocytes from 15 noninstitutionalized children affected with Down Syndrome (DS), in apparently good health, were studied and compared with those of 16 healthy control children of the same age. A complex derangement of all the major peripheral blood cell subsets, i.e., B cells, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, was present in DS children. A significant decrease of the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes, a marked and significant decrease of B lymphocyte absolute number and percentage, and dramatic modifications of the T-cell subsets were observed. The absolute number of CD4+ cells was significantly decreased, whereas CD8+ cells increased significantly in percentage but not in absolute number. A derangement of cells bearing markers associated with NK activity, such as CD57, CD16, and CD56, was observed. Among the most important alterations, the presence of a high number of CD57+, CD16- cells, of CD57+, CD8+ lymphocytes, and of CD3+, CD56+ lymphocytes was seen. Many of these alterations are similar to those characteristic of chromosomally normal subjects of advanced age. The hypothesis that the reduced thymic endocrine activity and the zinc deficiency characteristic of DS are responsible for the derangement of T and NK subsets is discussed.

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with a biologically standardized extract of Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

The allergological relevance of Ambrosia in Europe is growing but the efficacy of the injective immunotherapy for this allergen has been documented only in Northern America.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study the safety and efficacy of injective immunotherapy in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia artemisiifolia.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (18 M/14 F, mean age 36.78, range 23-60 years) suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma and sensitized to Ambrosia were enrolled and randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) study lasting 1 year. A maintenance dose corresponding to 7.2 microg of Amb a 1 was administered at 4-week intervals after the build-up. During the second and the third year, all patients were under active therapy in an open fashion. Symptom and medication scores, skin reactivity to Ambrosia (parallel line biological assay), and pollen counts were assessed throughout the trial.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients completed the trial. No severe adverse event was observed. During the DBPC phase, actively treated patients showed an improvement in asthmatic symptoms (P=0.02) and drug (P=0.0068) scores days with asthmatic symptoms (P=0.003), days with rhinitis symptoms (P=0.05), and days with intake of drugs (P=0.0058), as compared to before therapy. No improvement for any of these parameters was detected in the placebo group. Moreover, the number of days with rhinitis and asthma was significantly higher in the placebo as compared to the active group (P=0.048 and P<0.0001, respectively). Patients who switched from placebo to active therapy improved in rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and drug intake. The skin reactivity decreased significantly (12.2-fold, P=0.0001) in the active group whereas a slight increase (1.07-fold, P=0.87) was observed in the placebo group after the DBPC phase. After switching to active therapy, patients previously under placebo showed a significant decrease of this parameter (4.78-fold, P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Injective immunotherapy is safe and clinically effective in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia.

Lipid transfer protein and vicilin are important walnut allergens in patients not allergic to pollen

BACKGROUND

Walnut is the most common cause of allergic reactions to tree nuts, as reported by large population studies. Two major allergens of walnut have been identified up until now: a 2S albumin and a vicilin-like protein.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to identify the walnut major allergens in the Italian population and to compare the walnut IgE-binding profile in patients with or without pollen allergy.

METHODS

We selected 46 patients either with oral allergy syndrome confirmed by open oral challenge or with systemic symptoms after ingestion of walnut. These patients' sera were used for the immunoblotting of walnut extract; the identified allergens were purified by HPLC and sequenced. A peach-walnut cross-inhibition study was then performed.

RESULTS

The only major allergen recognized by our study population was a 9-kd lipid transfer protein (LTP), recognized by 37 patients. Two other minor allergens of approximately 9-kd molecular weight, both belonging to the vicilin family, were recognized by 10 patients. IgE binding to walnut LTP was completely inhibited by peach LTP.

CONCLUSION

In Italian patients with walnut allergy confirmed by documented history of severe systemic reactions or by open oral food challenge, the major allergen is an LTP. The sensitization to this protein seems to be secondary to the sensitization to peach LTP, which acts as the primary sensitizer. LTP and vicilins were able to sensitize patients not allergic to pollen.

Lipid-transfer protein is the major maize allergen maintaining IgE-binding activity after cooking at 100°C, as demonstrated in anaphylactic patients and patients with positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge results

BACKGROUND

In a previous study a 9-kd lipid-transfer protein (LTP) was identified as the major allergen of raw maize in a population of 22 anaphylactic patients. However, the stability of this protein in cooked maize is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the allergenicity of 5 maize hybrids and its modification after different thermal treatments by using sera from anaphylactic patients and patients with positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges.

METHODS

Five maize hybrids were extracted by using different methods, obtaining the water-soluble, zein, total zein, glutelin, and total protein fractions. The IgE-binding capacity of the different extracts, both raw and after thermal treatment, was investigated by means of SDS-PAGE immunoblotting. A 9-kd heat-stable allergen was purified by means of HPLC and sequenced. Changes in its secondary structure during and after heating from 25 degrees C to 100 degrees C were monitored by means of circular dichroism.

RESULTS

All raw maize hybrids showed similar protein and IgE-binding profiles. The SDS-PAGE of all the heat-treated hybrids demonstrated a decreased number of stained bands in respect to the raw samples. The IgE immunoblotting demonstrated that the major allergen of the water-soluble, total zein, total protein, and glutelin fractions was a 9-kd protein identified by means of amino acid sequence as an LTP and a sub-tilisin-chymotrypsin inhibitor (in total zein fraction). The IgE-binding capacity of this 9-kd protein remained unchanged after thermal treatments, even though circular dichroism demonstrated an altered secondary structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Maize LTP maintains its IgE-binding capacity after heat treatment, thus being the most eligible candidate for a causative role in severe anaphylactic reactions to both raw and cooked maize.

Identification of grape and wine allergens as an endochitinase 4, a lipid-transfer protein, and a thaumatin

BACKGROUND

Few allergic reactions to grape are reported in the literature. In some cases an association with peach and cherry allergy was observed. No IgE-mediated reactions to wine have been described, and no grape major allergens have yet been identified.

OBJECTIVE

We describe several severe reactions to grape or wine. We characterized the grape major allergens and tried to identify the allergen in wine.

METHODS

We collected documented histories of allergic reactions to grape and wine. Grape allergens were identified by means of SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting and purified by means of HPLC. Using amino acid sequencing and mass spectrometry, we identified the family of proteins to which the allergens belong. Cross-reactivity with peach and cherry was evaluated by means of cross-wise inhibition experiments.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with reactions to grape and 3 with anaphylactic reactions to wine were recruited. The major allergens were an endochitinase 4A and a lipid-transfer protein (LTP) that was homologous to and cross-reactive with peach LTP. A 24-kd protein homologous to the cherry thaumatin-like allergen was a minor allergen. Endochitinase 4A is very likely the allergen in vino novello and in vino Fragolino.

CONCLUSIONS

Grape and wine might cause severe allergic reactions in sensitive patients. The major allergens of grape are endochitinase 4A, which is also the allergen of wine, and an LTP cross-reacting with the peach major allergen.

Identification and characterisation of the IgE-binding proteins 2S albumin and conglutin gamma in almond (Prunus dulcis) seeds

BACKGROUND

Almond proteins can cause severe anaphylactic reactions in susceptible individuals. The aim of this study was the identification of IgE-binding proteins in almonds and the characterisation of these proteins by N-terminal sequencing.

METHODS

Five sera were selected from individuals with a positive reaction to food challenge. Sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting were performed on almond seed proteins. Purified IgE-binding proteins were tested for immunoblot inhibition with sera pre-incubated with extracts of hazelnut and walnut.

RESULTS

N-terminal sequences of the 12-, 30- and 45-kD proteins were obtained. The 45- and 30-kD proteins shared the same N terminus, with 60% homology to the conglutin gamma heavy chain from lupine seed (Lupinus albus) and to basic 7S globulin from soybean (Glycine max). The sequences of the N-terminal 12-kD protein and of an internal peptide obtained by endoproteinase digestion showed good homology to 2S albumin from English walnut (Jug r 1). Immunoblot inhibition experiments were performed and IgE binding to almond 2S albumin and conglutin gamma was detected in the presence of cross-reacting walnut or hazelnut antigens.

CONCLUSIONS

Two IgE-binding almond proteins were N-terminally sequenced and identified as almond 2S albumin and conglutin gamma. Localisation and conservation of IgE binding in a 6-kD peptide obtained by endoproteinase digestion of 2S albumin was shown.

Identification of hazelnut major allergens in sensitive patients with positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge results

BACKGROUND

The hazelnut major allergens identified to date are an 18-kd protein homologous to Bet v 1 and a 14-kd allergen homologous to Bet v 2. No studies have reported hazelnut allergens recognized in patients with positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) results or in patients allergic to hazelnut but not to birch.

OBJECTIVE

We characterized the hazelnut allergens by studying the IgE reactivity of 65 patients with positive DBPCFC results and 7 patients with severe anaphylaxis to hazelnut.

METHODS

Hazelnut allergens were identified by means of SDS-PAGE and IgE immunoblotting. Further characterization was done with amino acid sequencing, evaluation of the IgE-binding properties of raw and roasted hazelnut with enzyme allergosorbent test inhibition, assessment of cross-reactivity with different allergens by means of immunoblotting inhibition, and purification by means of HPLC.

RESULTS

All the sera from the patients with positive DBPCFC results recognized an 18- and a 47-kd allergen; other major allergens were at molecular weights of 32 and 35 kd. Binding to the 18-kd band was inhibited by birch extract, indicating its homology with the birch major allergen, and abolished in roasted hazelnut. The 47-kd allergen is a sucrose-binding protein, the 35-kd allergen is a legumin, and the 32-kd allergen is a 2S albumin. Patients with severe anaphylactic reactions to hazelnut showed specific IgE reactivity to a 9-kd allergen, totally inhibited by purified peach lipid-transfer protein (LTP), which was heat stable and, when purified, corresponded to an LTP.

CONCLUSIONS

The major allergen of hazelnut is an 18-kd protein homologous to Bet v 1, and the 9-kd allergen is presumably an LTP. Other major allergens have molecular weights of 47, 32, and 35 kd.

Introducing chemists to food allergy

Adverse reactions to food may be toxic or non toxic, depending on the susceptibility to a certain food; non toxic reactions that involve immune mechanisms are termed allergy if they are IgE-mediated. If no immunological mechanism is responsible, it is termed intolerance. The following disorders are considered a consequence of food allergy: gastrointestinal reactions (oral allergy syndrome, vomiting, diarrhea, protein-induced enterocolitic syndrome, eosinophilic gastroenteritis); respiratory reactions (rhinitis, asthma, laryngeal edema); cutaneous reactions (urticaria-angioedema, atopic dermatitis); anaphylaxis. There is much recent evidence to consider celiac disease an immunological disorder. Food allergy diagnosis is based on history, SPT, specific IgE, food challenges. DBPCFC is fundamental for diagnosing true food allergy; patients who have had anaphylaxis to food must not undergo DBPCFC. Rapidly progressive respiratory reactions and anaphylactic shock are life-threatening reactions that can be caused by food allergy. The doses of food inducing anaphylaxis can be very low, therefore commercial cross-contamination with an unsuspected food during food processing can be risky for the food allergic patient. The prevention of severe anaphylactic food reactions may lie in interdisciplinary collaboration among allergologists, chemists, food technologists, and experts in food industry research.

Metastatic metanephric adenoma with foci of papillary carcinoma in a child: a combined histologic, immunohistochemical, and FISH study

We report an example of metastatic metanephric adenoma containing foci of papillary carcinoma in the primitive tumor arising in the left kidney of an 11-year-old girl. Histology revealed a monomorphous population of small cells with bland cytology arranged in pseudoglandular, tubular, papillary, and glomeruloid structures with frequent psammoma bodies. Intermixed there were foci of and small cavities lined by larger cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and larger nuclei with small nucleoli. A regional lymph node contained metastatic deposits with the former histologic pattern. By immunohistochemistry the small cells were negative for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and keratin 7 while these antibodies reacted positively in the larger cells. A fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) study for chromosome 17 in imprints from the primitive tumor revealed 3 signals in about 10% of the nuclei while the rest was disomic. Disaggregated cells from the metastatic lymph node consistently revealed 2 signals for chromosomes 7, 16, and l7. Histology of the primitive tumor resembled the epithelial component of the so-called metanephric adenofibroma while the metastatic lymph node exhibited histologic and FISH genomic features of metanephic adenoma. Int J Surg Pathol 9(3):241-247, 2001

Characterization of the major allergen of plum as a lipid transfer protein

BACKGROUND

Allergy to Prunoideae fruit (plum, peach, cherry and apricot) is one of the most frequent food allergies in southern Europe. All these fruits cross-react in vivo and in vitro, as they share their major allergen, a 9 kD lipid transfer protein (LTP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was the identification and molecular characterization of the major allergen of plum.

METHODS

The IgE pattern of reactivity to plums was investigated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the sera of 23 patients. The identified major allergen was purified by HPLC, using a cationic-exchange column followed by gel-filtration. Further characterization was achieved by periodic-Schiff stain, isoelectrofocusing and N-terminal amino acid sequencing.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The major allergen of plum is a 9 kD lipid transfer protein, not glycosylated and with a basic character (pI>9), highly homologous to the major allergen of peach.

Determination of the primary structure of two lipid transfer proteins from apricot (Prunus armeniaca)

It has been recently demonstrated that the major allergen of apricot is a protein of molecular mass (Mr) 9000 belonging to the family of Lipid Transfer Protein. The aim of this study was the determination of the primary structure of apricot LTP by micro-sequencing and mass spectrometric analyses. Apricot LTP is a 91 amino acids protein like peach and almond LTPs with a sequence identity of 91% and 94%, respectively. Like for the peach LTP, out of the 25 amino acids forming the inner surface of the tunnel-like hydrophobic cavity in maize ns-LTP, 16 are identical and 7 similar in the apricot LTP, supporting the hypothesis of a similar function.

The major allergen of sesame seeds (Sesamum indicum) is a 2S albumin

BACKGROUND

Allergic reactions induced by ingestion of foods containing sesame seeds are a well recognized cause of severe food-induced anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify and characterize the clinically most important major allergen of sesame seeds.

METHODS

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and IgE immunoblotting were performed on sera of 10 patients selected for severe and documented allergic reaction after eating food containing sesame. The major allergen was purified by gel filtration and characterized by isoelectric point (pI), glycosylation and amino acid sequencing.

RESULTS

All the patients had positive IgE antibodies and skin prick tests (SPTs) to sesame. The major, clinically most important allergen was a protein with molecular mass of about 9000. It was not glycosylated, the amino acid sequence showed it was a 2S albumin with a pI of 7.3; the small and the large subunits, forming the whole protein, showed pI values of 6.5 and 6.0.

The maize major allergen, which is responsible for food-induced allergic reactions, is a lipid transfer protein

BACKGROUND

Cereals are the most important nutritional component in the human diet. Food-induced allergic reactions to these substances therefore have serious implications, and exhaustive diagnosis is required. Such diagnosis is still difficult because of the incomplete knowledge about major cereal allergens. In particular, few food-induced allergic reactions to maize have been reported, and no information on the allergenic proteins is available.

OBJECTIVE

Having observed several anaphylactic reactions to maize, we planned a study to identify maize major allergens and cross-reactivity with other cereals, as well as to peach because the majority of patients also reacted to Prunoideae fruits.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with systemic symptoms after maize ingestion and positive skin prick test responses and serum-specific IgE antibodies to maize were selected. The IgE-reactivity pattern was identified by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The major allergen identified was then purified by HPLC and characterized by mass spectrometry, determination of the isoelectric point value, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing.

RESULTS

Sera from 19 (86%) of the 22 patients recognized a 9-kd protein, thus confirming this as the maize major allergen. This protein had an isoelectric point of greater than 9, a molecular mass of 9047.0 d, and no glycosylation. Determination of its N-terminal sequence showed that it was a lipid transfer protein (LTP). By using immunoblotting-inhibition experiments, we demonstrated that the LTP cross-reacts completely with rice and peach LTPs but not with wheat or barley LTPs. N-terminal sequence of the 16-kd allergen (recognized by 36% of patients) showed it to be the maize inhibitor of trypsin. This protein cross-reacts completely with grass, wheat, barley, and rice trypsin inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The major allergen of maize is an LTP with a molecular weight of 9 kd that is highly homologous with the peach LTP, the major allergen of the Prunoideae subfamily.

Hazelnut allergy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Tree nuts are a common cause of food allergy in Europe. However, few studies deal with real food allergy to hazelnuts in subjects believed to be allergic to this food.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to select subjects with a history of allergic reactions on ingestion of hazelnut and determine how many of these have true allergy by means of the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

METHODS

Eighty-six subjects with a history of symptoms after hazelnut ingestion were recruited from 3 allergy centers (Milan, Zurich, and Copenhagen). All subjects underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens and hazelnut, as well as having their specific hazelnut IgE levels determined. Diagnosis of clinical relevant food allergy was made on the basis of the DBPCFC.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven (77.9%) of 86 subjects had a positive DBPCFC result; 8 were placebo responders, and 11 were nonresponders. Of the 11 nonresponders, 4 had positive open-challenge test results. Of the DBPCFC-positive subjects, 87% also had positive skin test responses to birch pollen extract. Specific IgE determination for hazelnut (positive CAP response >/=0.7 kU/L [ie, class 2]) showed a sensitivity of 0.75, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92, a specificity of 0.16, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.05. Skin tests with commercial hazelnut extract produced a sensitivity of 0.89, a PPV of 0.92, a specificity of 0.05, and an NPV of 0.05. Skin tests with natural food produced a sensitivity of 0.88, a PPV of 0.94, a specificity of 0.27, and an NPV of 0.15.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that hazelnut is an allergenic source that can cause real food allergy, as confirmed by DBPCFC. Skin and IgE tests demonstrated reasonable sensitivity and PPV but a very low specificity and NPV, thus implying that these should not be used to validate the diagnosis of food allergy to hazelnut.

Technological processes to decrease the allergenicity of peach juice and nectar

Among vegetable foods peach (Prunus persica) has been recognized as a significant cause of allergy. The protein, which is considered to be the major peach allergen, has been named Pru p 1. Because peaches are consumed both as fresh fruits and after processing to obtain peach juice, nectar, jam, syrupy peach, etc., research was carried out to identify a technological process for production of hypo- or nonallergenic peach-based products. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting analysis of extracts prepared from four commercial peach nectars showed that the Pru p 1 was not removed, and neither was its allergenic activity decreased by technological treatments carried out for nectar production. Some treatments oriented toward a removal of or, at least, a decrease in the allergenic power were assumed and verified at laboratory scale. A variable considered was heat treatment at 121 degrees C for 10 and 30 min: this treatment was not able to decrease the allergenicity of the Pru p 1 protein. Furthermore, the protein band was still present even after 60-min reaction with two different acidic proteases. The two technological treatments that were found to decrease the major allergen of peach were chemical lye peeling of fruits and ultrafiltration of juice through membranes with suitable cutoff. On the basis of the results obtained from this research, a processing flow sheet was defined to obtain hypoallergenic or probably nonallergenic limpid juices and nectars. These products may represent, besides finished foods, intermediates to obtain various products after addition of further ingredients such as pectins, sugars, and fiber.

Evidence for a lipid transfer protein as the major allergen of apricot

BACKGROUND

Apricots are widely grown in Europe, and allergic reactions are becoming more common, especially oral allergy syndrome. Apricot belongs to the botanical subfamily of Prunoideae, which includes peach, the major allergen of which was identified as a 9-kd protein, a lipid transfer protein (LTP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the IgE reactivity pattern to an apricot extract in subjects with allergic reactions to apricot, as demonstrated by a positive oral challenge response.

METHODS

Thirty patients were investigated. All the patients displayed oral allergy syndrome (2 with systemic reactions) to apricot, with positive open food challenge responses, skin prick test responses, and serum-specific IgE antibodies to apricot. The IgE reactivity pattern to apricot extract was identified by using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The major allergen, a 9-kd protein, was then purified by HPLC and characterized by periodic acid-Schiff stain, isoelectric point determination, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing.

RESULTS

The sera from all patients allergic to apricot recognized the 9-kd protein, whereas none of the other allergens, with molecular weights from 15 to 80 kd, acted as a major allergen. The 9-kd allergen has an isoelectric point of 8.7 and is not glycosylated. Determination of the N-terminal 34 amino acid sequence showed that it belongs to the LTP family, with a 94% homology with the LTP from peach. IgE blotting of the apricot extract was completely inhibited by the 9-kd purified LTP from peach.

CONCLUSIONS

The major allergen of apricot is an LTP, which is highly cross-reactive with the LTP from peach.