Simple office-based behavioral approach to patients with chronic belching

Chronic belching can be a difficult and socially disabling symptom often attributed to reflux with poor response to therapy. In patients where aerophagia is identified as a clear cause, treatment with baclofen may not be tolerated, and biofeedback therapy is time-intensive and may still not be effective. In this pilot study, an office-based easy-to-perform method based on sustained glottal opening was used in five patients with chronic belching, in whom reflux and other causes had been excluded. Treatment consisted of having the patient breathe slowly and diaphragmatically with his or her mouth open during supine, then sitting periods to prevent belching. When this was successful, patients were then counseled on continuing this breathing with mouth slightly ajar as an outpatient using this persistently. Wide mouth opening was used for rescue therapy of belching attacks. All five patients responded to the office-based therapy with complete cessation of belching during the visit. At 1-month follow up, four patients remained asymptomatic. One patient was asymptomatic but for two breakthrough attacks easily managed with the protocol. A simple office-based procedure based on complete glottal opening can be curative for a subset of patients with chronic eructation secondary to repetitive air swallowing.

Review article: proton pump inhibitor therapy for suspected eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) have confirmed the existence of a new disease phenotype, proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE).

AIM

To summarise evidence supporting the use of PPI therapy in patients with suspected EoE (oesophageal dysfunction plus >15 eos/HPF in oesophageal biopsies).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through MEDLINE, using the MeSH search terms 'eosinophilic oesophagitis', 'proton pump inhibitors' and 'oesophageal eosinophilia'. Relevant articles and their reference lists were identified through manual review.

RESULTS

Ten articles, including 258 patients with suspected EoE (152 children, 106 adults) undergoing clinico-histological re-evaluation after PPI therapy, were identified. In children, clinical response ranged from 78% to 86% and histological remission from 23% to 40%. In adults, symptom response ranged from 25% to 80% and histological remission from 33% to 61%. Among PPI-REE patients with oesophageal pH-monitoring, 35 showed pathological and 10 normal studies. PPI-REE was significantly commoner with documented gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) when compared to patients with negative pH monitoring (70% vs. 29%, P < 0.001). Symptom improvement/resolution occurred in 50-85% of patients without histological remission on PPI therapy. Six PPI-REE patients demonstrated clinico-histological relapse on PPI therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

At least one third of patients with suspected EoE achieve clinico-histological remission on PPI therapy. Response is more limited in children compared with that in adults. pH monitoring does not accurately predict response to PPI therapy, albeit histological remission is significantly higher, up to 70%, upon documented GERD. Symptom improvement is common with PPI therapy despite persistent eosinophilic infiltration.

An allergic phenotype and the use of steroid inhalers predict eosinophilic oesophagitis in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) commonly have asthma and atopy.

AIMS

To determine the predictive factors of EoE in patients with asthma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a large database identified 156 asthma patients with EoE and 276 patients without EoE between 2000 and 2010. Clinical and laboratory characteristics were first analyzed in half of each group. Significant differences and modelling were then applied to the other half of each group in a split half analysis.

RESULTS

Odds ratios and P-values found to predict the presence of EoE in asthma patients were: allergic vs. non-allergic asthma (4.07, <0.01), food allergies (45, <0.01), allergic rhinitis (2.13, =0.01) and peripheral eosinophilia (4.51, <0.01). The use of inhaled corticosteroids was negatively associated with EoE (0.41, <0.01) for asthma patients and (0.37, P < 0.01) for allergic type asthma patients. EoE patients were also younger (27.4 vs. 41.6 years old, P < 0.01). By logistic regression analysis, allergic asthma, presence of peripheral eosinophilia and use of inhaled steroids remained significant. From these parameters, a 3.5-point scoring system model for EoE in asthma was formed with an ROC = 0.787 on split analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In descending order, peripheral eosinophilia, allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis are associated with EoE in patients with asthma. Steroid inhalers appear to have a protective effect against EoE. An accurate and simple scoring system can be used as a screening tool to predict the presence of EoE in patients with asthma and dysphagia. EoE should be viewed as part of a generalised allergic phenotype rather than isolated oesophageal disease.

Achalasia secondary to neoplasia: a disease with a changing differential diagnosis

Achalasia secondary to neoplasia is an uncommon entity, but recognition is paramount given the concern of missing a cancer diagnosis. Most case series of secondary achalasia occurred in prior decades raising the question of whether the underlying neoplastic causes have changed. All cases of achalasia secondary to neoplasia were reviewed at the Mayo Clinic from 2000 to the present. Cases were assessed for underlying cause of achalasia, whether achalasia was the primary presentation and demographic and clinical factors. Seventeen patients with achalasia secondary to neoplasia were identified. This was 1.5% of all patients with achalasia seen. The most common causes were adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, followed by breast and non-small cell lung cancer. No cases of gastric cancer were identified. Most patients had weight loss and rapid onset of symptoms but could not clearly be distinguished from primary achalasia. Nine patients presented with achalasia, whereas eight patients had known neoplasia. Five of these patients had a positive paraneoplastic panel suggestive of a paraneoplastic syndrome. Prognosis was generally poor except for patients with esophageal leiomyomatosis. This case series demonstrates a changing differential diagnosis for achalasia secondary to neoplasia with a higher number of patients presenting with a known primary and with a paraneoplastic syndrome. Awareness of secondary achalasia and its differentiation from primary causes is still essential.

Endoscopic ablative therapy for Barrett's esophagus: a potential cause of eosinophilic esophagitis

Markedly increased esophageal eosinophils are associated with allergy- or reflux-based eosinophilic esophagitis. Other known disorders that cause this entity are unusual. To characterize the clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings of patients who develop marked esophageal eosinophilic infiltration after ablative therapy for Barrett's dysplasia. All patients who underwent endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus between 1991 and 2009 with photodynamic therapy or radio frequency were screened for a pathologic descriptor of 'eosinophils' on biopsy. Patients whose biopsies demonstrated >15 eosinophils per high power (HPF) field in squamous epithelium after ablation were reviewed and included in the study group. Thirteen of 385 (3.4%) patients underwent ablation for Barrett's esophagus and subsequently had large numbers of intraepithelial eosinophils. All patients had long segment Barrett's (mean 8.0 cm) with low- or high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. All had undergone photodynamic therapy as their form of ablation. No patients had typical symptoms or endoscopic findings of eosinophilic esophagitis. Eleven patients were on proton pump inhibitors. The time between ablation and onset of esophageal eosinophilia ranged from 83 to 692 days. Intraepithelial eosinophil counts ranged from 30 to 150/HPF (mean 90). The majority of cases showed eosinophilic degranulation, spongiosis, increased papillary height, and basal zone thickening. The natural history of esophageal eosinophilia was variable after ablation, persisting consistently or sporadically on biopsy for up to 6 years. Ablation for Barrett's dysplasia can be followed rarely by eosinophil infiltrates with a histological resemblance to allergy-based eosinophilic esophagitis, but lacking dysphagia. The pathophysiology is unknown.

Results of ambulatory pH monitoring do not reliably predict response to therapy in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

The consensus statements for eosinophilic oesophagitis recommend that ambulatory pH monitoring is one means of determining if gastro-oesophageal reflux is the cause of oesophageal eosinophilia and should guide pharmacological therapy.

AIM

To evaluate prospectively the accuracy of pH monitoring as a predictor of endoscopic, histological and symptomatic response in patients with oesophageal eosinophilia.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective trial in which patients with oesophageal eosinophilic infiltration with ≥15 eos/hpf underwent a 24-h pH study and were placed in one of two treatment arms for 6 weeks based on positive or negative results. Patients with abnormal acid exposure were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily and others were treated with oral viscous budesonide 1 g twice daily. Response to treatment was assessed by oesophageal histology (<5 eos/hpf) and symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were enrolled in the study. The average patient age was 39 years and 31 patients (61%) were male. The average number of eosinophils per hpf, prior to study enrolment was 41.2 (range 15-140, s.d. 27.7). Nineteen (37%) had positive pH studies and 32 (63%) had negative pH studies. Eighteen patients completed treatment with esomeprazole. Only eleven (61%) had histological response and, of these eleven, five (46%) had symptomatic improvement. A total of 28 patients with normal acid exposure completed treatment with budesonide. Only 16 (57%) had histological and 11 (69%) had symptomatic improvement.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective trial of pH-guided treatment, neither positive nor negative results of initial pH monitoring accurately predicted response to therapy.

Endoscopic diagnosis and resection of esophageal granular cell tumors

Granular cell tumors (GCT) are uncommon neoplasms. There is controversy regarding the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of esophageal GCT. We studied the endoscopic diagnosis and management of esophageal GCT among 23 patients identified in a single-institution pathology database. Medical records, pathology, and endoscopic images were reviewed. All patients underwent endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and endoscopic resection was performed in 10 patients. Seven of 23 patients had more than one esophageal GCT. Only six lesions exhibited a classic yellow discoloration. Among patients with a single GCT, three, four, and nine lesions were located in the proximal, middle, and distal esophagus, respectively. EUS showed hypoechoic, smooth-edged lesions usually confined to deep mucosa and submucosa. Standard forceps biopsy was diagnostic in 19 of 23 patients (83%). Ten GCT ≤ 10 mm in diameter underwent successful endoscopic mucosal resection without complication. The endoscopic appearance, location, and number of esophageal GCT are highly variable. Histological proof is still necessary for the differential diagnosis of this rare neoplasm. Endoscopic forceps biopsy is usually diagnostic. Endoscopic resection appears safe and effective in selected cases with lesions ≤ 10 mm.

Review article: an analysis of the efficacy, perforation rates and methods used in pneumatic dilation for achalasia

BACKGROUND

Pneumatic dilation has re-emerged as a first line treatment for achalasia, but conclusions are limited by the relatively small numbers of patients studied and the lack of long term follow-up.

AIM

To summarise and analyse 29 available studies evaluating pneumatic dilation for achalasia with focus on efficacy, rate or perforation and dilation technique.

METHODS

A literature search for all studies, in which pneumatic dilation was performed for treatment of achalasia, was conducted. Studies, in which clear endpoints of efficacy of single dilation sessions over a period of years, were chosen.

RESULTS

The response for a single dilation session was 66% at 1 year and 59, 53, 50 and 25% at 2, 3, 5 and 10 years respectively. Use of a Rigiflex dilator and multiple dilations during the initial treatment improved efficacy. Overall perforation rate was only 2% (24/1358) of which only 1% required surgery. Use of multiple dilations led to increased perforation risk. The method of dilation used with regard to balloon size, pressure used, dilation times and single or multiple dilations varied in almost every study.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumatic dilation is safer than commonly thought and efficacious, although multiple dilations will be needed over a lifetime in most patients. Standardisation of the technique should be attempted.

The effects of a weakly acidic meal on gastric buffering and postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Exclusion of the meal during ambulatory pH monitoring presumes that a meal completely buffers gastric acid and reflux of acidic food content cannot be distinguished from gastric acid. However, the ability of a meal to completely buffer gastric acid remains unclear.

AIM

To determine the effect of a weakly acid meal on gastric buffering and oesophageal acid exposure.

METHODS

Patients undergoing multichannel intraluminal impedance pH studies were given a standard weakly acidic meal (pH = 5.9). Gastric and oesophageal pH was measured during the meal and in 15 min intervals for 2 h postprandially.

RESULTS

The study included 30 patients, with pathological acid reflux detected in 18 patients. Complete gastric buffering occurred in seven patients (23%) and was lost in all patients within 75 min of the meal. Oesophageal acid was detected in 33% of patients within 30 min of the meal and 81% of patients during the 2 h postprandial period. Postprandial oesophageal acid exposure was greater in patients with pathological acid reflux (9 ± 2.7% vs. 1.7 ± 0.8% P = 0.05) with a trend towards more incomplete gastric acid buffering and significant differences when measuring weak acid reflux (pH 4-5). Acid reflux rarely occurred in the absence of gastric acid, with gastric acid present in 74 of 79 (94%) fifteen minute postprandial intervals with acid reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of a meal to buffer gastric acid is poor. Early postprandial oesophageal acid reflux occurs in a substantial proportion of patients. Addition of a weakly acidic or pH neutral meal to ambulatory pH monitoring may unmask early postprandial acid reflux and provide data on gastric acid buffering.

Postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity is a reliable predictor of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Measurement of oesophageal acid exposure parameters postprandially has been shown to distinguish gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients from normal individuals.

AIMS

To calculate the accuracy of postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity in diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

Ambulatory 24-h pH studies of 626 patients were analysed retrospectively. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, defined as pH < 4 for > 4.2% of time, was identified in 305 subjects. Postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity was measured for 2 and 3 h after the largest meal peak as determined from gastric pH. Postprandial symptom-associated probability was calculated.

RESULTS

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects had a greater postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity than non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects [median (IQR): 0.57 (0.08-2.66) vs. 0.03 (0.01-0.15) mmol*h/L]. Median postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity did not differ with gender or age in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects (P > 0.05 for all). A 3-h postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity value of 0.121 mmol*h/L had a 71.1% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity in diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects with symptoms had a higher postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity than those without (P = 0.043), whereas non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects with and without symptoms did not differ (P = 0.74). The correlation between symptom-associated probability and postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity was poor (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: r = 0.15; non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: r = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity provides a robust estimation of oesophageal acid exposure and may predict symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Transient failure of opening of the lower oesophageal sphincter on upright oesophagrams: radiographic and clinical findings

The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency, radiographic features, and clinical importance of transient failure of opening of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) on upright double-contrast views of the oesophagus. A computerized search of radiology records identified 16 patients who had transient failure of opening of the LOS on upright views from biphasic oesophagrams or upper gastrointestinal tract examinations using high-density barium but normal opening of the LOS on prone views using low-density barium. The radiographic findings were reviewed and correlated with the clinical and manometric findings. In all cases, barium studies revealed tapered, beaklike narrowing of the distal oesophagus on upright double-contrast views, with a normal-appearing distal oesophagus, normal opening of the LOS, and intact peristalsis on prone single-contrast views. Only seven patients (44%) had dysphagia. Five of these patients had clinical follow-up, and the dysphagia improved or resolved without specific treatment for LOS dysfunction in four. The remaining patient had persistent dysphagia, but this individual had polymyositis as the likely cause for his dysphagia. Manometry revealed incomplete relaxation of the LOS in two patients and normal relaxation in one. Our experience suggests that failure of opening of the LOS may be observed as a transient finding of little clinical importance on upright double-contrast views of the oesophagus using high-density barium, with normal opening of the LOS on prone single-contrast views using low-density barium. It is important to be aware of this finding, so that it is not mistaken for achalasia or other abnormalities of the distal oesophagus.

Detection of reflux esophagitis on double-contrast esophagrams and endoscopy using the histologic findings as the gold standard

The purpose of our study was to determine the accuracy of double-contrast barium studies and endoscopy for detecting reflux esophagitis, using the endoscopic biopsy findings as the gold standard. A review of radiology, endoscopy, and pathology files showed 37 patients with reflux symptoms who underwent double-contrast barium studies and endoscopy with biopsy specimens from the esophagus. The radiographic images were reviewed in a blinded fashion and correlated with the endoscopic and histologic findings to determine the radiographic and endoscopic accuracies for detecting reflux esophagitis, using the endoscopic biopsy specimens as the gold standard. Double-contrast barium studies and endoscopy had low but comparable accuracies for detecting reflux esophagitis, with sensitivities of 35% and 39%, specificities of 79% and 71%, positive predictive values of 73% and 69%, and negative predictive values of 42% and 41%, respectively. When mucosa granularity was evaluated as an individual sign of esophagitis on double-contrast studies, this finding had a sensitivity of 35%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 89%, and a negative predictive value of 46% for detecting reflux esophagitis. Our experience suggests that double-contrast barium studies and endoscopy have limited ability to detect reflux esophagitis, in particular mild esophagitis, when using the histologic findings as the gold standard. When radiographic abnormalities are detected, however, mucosal granularity is the single best sign of reflux esophagitis on double-contrast studies.

Short-segment Barrett's esophagus: findings on double-contrast esophagography in 20 patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the findings of short-segment Barrett's esophagus on double-contrast esophagography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of pathology and endoscopy data revealed 142 patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus, which was defined as columnar epithelium in the distal esophagus extending 3 cm or less above the gastroesophageal junction at endoscopy with histopathologic confirmation of intestinal metaplasia. Twenty of these patients underwent double-contrast esophagography. These 20 patients comprised our study group. The original radiology reports and images were reviewed to determine the findings on double-contrast esophagography. Medical records were also reviewed to determine the clinical findings and treatment.

RESULTS

Double-contrast esophagrams revealed hiatal hernias in 18 patients (90%), gastroesophageal reflux in 16 (80%), reflux esophagitis in seven (35%), peptic scarring or strictures in 11 (55%), and a reticular mucosal pattern in none. A total of 14 patients (70%) had morphologic findings of reflux disease with esophagitis alone (three patients), peptic scarring or strictures alone (seven patients), or both (four patients), but the remaining six (30%) had hiatal hernias or gastroesophageal reflux as the only radiographic finding.

CONCLUSION

Double-contrast esophagography revealed morphologic findings of reflux disease with esophagitis, peptic scarring or strictures, or both in 70% of patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus. Thus, the absence of esophagitis or peptic scarring or strictures on double-contrast esophagography does not exclude the possibility of short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Congenital esophageal stenosis in adults: clinical and radiographic findings in seven patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and radiographic findings in seven adults with congenital esophageal stenosis.

CONCLUSION

In young or middle-aged individuals, particularly men with long-standing dysphagia, an upper or mid esophageal stricture with multiple ringlike constrictions is a characteristic appearance of congenital esophageal stenosis on double-contrast esophagography.

Maximal acid reflux control for Barrett's oesophagus: feasible and effective

The treatment of patients with Barrett's oesophagus is controversial. Debate exists regarding the use and value of high dose acid suppression as the standard of practice. Despite prolonged use of high dose proton pump inhibitors (40 mg omeprazole, 60 mg lansoprazole), most studies have shown no convincing evidence of significant regression of Barrett's length. These studies, however, have used fixed doses of proton pump inhibitors and did not regularly document control of oesophageal acid exposure.

AIM

To determine whether regression of Barrett's epithelium can be achieved with documented maximal acid suppression.

METHODS

We have prospectively followed nine patients with Barrett's oesophagus (eight male; mean age 60 years) for more than 1 year. They were all treated using medical therapy with pH monitoring documenting oesophageal acid exposure over 24 h < 1.6% of the time, and with two or more esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed by the same endoscopist.

RESULTS

Acid control was individually tailored and achieved with proton pump inhibitor b.d. (omeprazole 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg) and ranitidine at bedtime (HS) (Ran) if necessary. All nine patients (100%) showed some evidence of regression. All nine patients (100%) showed a decrease in Barrett's length (mean 2 cm, range 1-3 cm). Six out of nine (66.67%) patients showed evidence of squamous islands on the last oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. The mean total distal oesophageal acid exposure was 0.38% (range: 0-1.5%). The mean follow-up of patients was 54 months (range: 13-118 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent and individually tailored maximal acid suppression documented by pH-metry is achievable and may result in decreased length and development of squamous islands in patients with Barrett's epithelium. This approach should be further evaluated as potentially the preferred medical treatment for these patients.

Effect of different recumbent positions on postprandial gastroesophageal reflux in normal subjects

OBJECTIVE

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is increased in the right compared to the left recumbent position. Esophageal acid exposure is related to the acidity at the cardia, but the effect of body position on the acidity at the cardia has not yet been investigated. We aimed to investigate the mechanisms underlying increased esophageal acid exposure in the right recumbent position.

METHODS

On 2 separate days a 4-h combined esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manometry and pH recording of esophagus, gastric cardia, and corpus was performed in the right and left recumbent position after a high fat meal in 10 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

In the right recumbent position a prolonged esophageal acid exposure (7.0% vs 2.0%, p < 0.03), a higher incidence of reflux episodes (3.8 vs 0.9/h, p < 0.03), more transient LES relaxations (TLESRs) (6.5 vs 3.2/h, p < 0.03), and higher percentage TLESRs associated with reflux (57.0% vs 22.4% p < 0.03) was recorded than in the left supine position. Acidity at gastric cardia and corpus was not affected by body position.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased esophageal acid exposure in the right recumbent position relative to the left recumbent position is the result of a higher incidence of GER episodes caused by an increased incidence of TLESRs and higher percentage of TLESRs associated with GER. Body position does not affect the acidity at the gastric cardia and corpus.

Effect of different recumbent positions on postprandial gastroesophageal reflux in normal subjects

OBJECTIVE

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is increased in the right compared to the left recumbent position. Esophageal acid exposure is related to the acidity at the cardia, but the effect of body position on the acidity at the cardia has not yet been investigated. We aimed to investigate the mechanisms underlying increased esophageal acid exposure in the right recumbent position.

METHODS

On 2 separate days a 4-h combined esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manometry and pH recording of esophagus, gastric cardia, and corpus was performed in the right and left recumbent position after a high fat meal in 10 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

In the right recumbent position a prolonged esophageal acid exposure (7.0% vs 2.0%, p < 0.03), a higher incidence of reflux episodes (3.8 vs 0.9/h, p < 0.03), more transient LES relaxations (TLESRs) (6.5 vs 3.2/h, p < 0.03), and higher percentage TLESRs associated with reflux (57.0% vs 22.4% p < 0.03) was recorded than in the left supine position. Acidity at gastric cardia and corpus was not affected by body position.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased esophageal acid exposure in the right recumbent position relative to the left recumbent position is the result of a higher incidence of GER episodes caused by an increased incidence of TLESRs and higher percentage of TLESRs associated with GER. Body position does not affect the acidity at the gastric cardia and corpus.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus

GERD has emerged as an important medical issue by virtue not only of its high prevalence, but also by the concern that it may predispose to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. It generally is classified into erosive and nonerosive forms. Nonerosive GERD tends to remain as such in most patients, and treatment is based on symptom relief. In contrast, erosive GERD mandates aggressive lifelong treatment based on its inevitable relapse without appropriate treatment. Two excellent therapies are available for GERD. Proton-pump inhibitors are highly efficacious and have an excellent long-term (> 10 years) safety profile. Laparoscopic fundoplication offers a new and easier method of delivering a standard reliable procedure also with excellent long-term efficacy. The occurrence of Barrett's esophagus among reflux patients has emerged as an important problem mostly because of the rapidly rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in the population. All patients with long-standing reflux symptoms should be screened for Barrett's and subsequently followed regularly with surveillance endoscopy if Barrett's is detected. Although there are no data to show that aggressive medical or surgical treatment alters the malignant potential of this disease, patients need lifelong therapy.

Digestive system disorders: gastroesophageal reflux disease

This article comes from Clinical Evidence (1999; 1 : 145-153), a new resource for clinicians produced jointly by the BMJ Publishing Group and the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. Clinical Evidence is an extensively peer-reviewed publication that summarizes the best available evidence on the effects of common clinical interventions gleaned from thorough searches and appraisal of the world literature. It became available in the United States late last year. Please see advertisement for more information or, alternatively, visit the web site at www. evidence.org.

Congenital esophageal stenosis in adults

OBJECTIVE

Congenital esophageal stenosis is thought to be a rare disease confined to infancy and childhood with only a few case reports in adults described.

METHODS

We report five patients between the ages of 19 and 46 yr who presented with this disorder over a 2-yr period.

RESULTS

Patients had been labeled with reflux strictures, webs, or as idiopathic in the past. All patients had chronic solid food dysphagia, some since early childhood. The location of the stricture varied, occurring in the mid or proximal esophagus in four, but throughout the esophagus in one. Radiographic and endoscopic appearance was a smooth concentric stricture or multiple rings, sometimes tracheal in appearance. Endosonography was performed in two patients, both of whom had focal circumferential hypoechoic wall thickening with disruption of the normal layer pattern corresponding to the areas of luminal narrowing. All patients dilated had good symptomatic response, with resolution of symptoms up to 6 months in follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that congenital esophageal stenosis does occur in adults and may be underrecognized. Its endosonographic appearance is described.

Motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Esophageal dysmotility occurs in association with GERD; however, the cause of these motility abnormalities is not known. It is also not clear whether injury results from the presence of acid itself, inflammatory change or fibrosisin the esophageal wall. It is also unclear if reversal of these abnormalities takes place, and if so, to what degree. There are, however, a subset of patients who seem to have improvement with effective medical or surgical therapy, parodoxically, the same patients in whom a fundoplication, particularly a complete wrap, would lead to severe postoperative dysphagia secondary to preoperative dysmotility. What does all this mean for the individual patient? It is likely that most will not have any important change in esophageal motility abnormalities with standard medical or surgical therapy. Fundoplication might be safely performed in patients with minimal motility abnormalities, but those with severe abnormalities should be approached with caution. The conservative approach is to perform a partial fundoplication (Toupet) in those with ineffective motility (> 30% low-amplitude or nontransmitted contractions). It is hoped that future investigations will aid in understanding the pathogenesis of these abnormalities and how they can be used more precisely to guide antireflux therapy.