Dermatological manifestations in Noonan syndrome: a prospective multicentric study of 129 patients positive for mutation

BACKGROUND

Data on dermatological manifestations of Noonan syndrome (NS) remain heterogeneous and are based on limited dermatological expertise.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the dermatological manifestations of NS, compare them with the literature findings, and test for dermatological phenotype-genotype correlations with or without the presence of PTPN11 mutations.

METHODS

We performed a large 4-year, prospective, multicentric, collaborative dermatological and genetic study.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 patients with NS were enrolled, including 65 patients with PTPN11-NS, 34 patients with PTPN11-NS with multiple lentigines (NSML), and 30 patients with NS who had a mutation other than PTPN11. Easy bruising was the most frequent dermatological finding in PTPN11-NS, present in 53·8% of patients. Multiple lentigines and café-au-lait macules (n ≥ 3) were present in 94% and 80% of cases of NSML linked to specific mutations of PTPN11, respectively. Atypical forms of NSML could be associated with NS with RAF1 or NRAS mutations. In univariate analysis, patients without a PTPN11 mutation showed (i) a significantly higher frequency of keratinization disorders (P = 0·001), including keratosis pilaris (P = 0·005), ulerythema ophryogenes (P = 0·0001) and palmar and/or plantar hyperkeratosis (P = 0·06, trend association), and (ii) a significantly higher frequency of scarce scalp hair (P = 0·035) and scarce or absent eyelashes (P = 0·06, trend association) than those with PTPN11 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The cutaneous phenotype of NS with a PTPN11 mutation is generally mild and nonspecific, whereas the absence of a PTPN11 mutation is associated with a high frequency of keratinization disorders and hair abnormalities.

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex generalized severe induces a T helper 17 response and is improved by apremilast treatment

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex generalized severe (EBS-gen sev) is a genetic disorder caused by mutation in the KRT5 or KRT14 genes. Although it is usually considered a mechanical disease, recent data argue for additional inflammatory mechanisms.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the inflammation in the skin of patients with EBS-gen sev.

METHODS

A first immunohistochemical retrospective study was performed on frozen skin samples from 17 patients with EBS-gen sev. A second multicentre prospective study was conducted on 10 patients with severe EBS-gen sev. Blister fluid and epidermis were processed for immunochemical analysis and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cytokine expression was analysed in blister fluid and compared with that in controls.

RESULTS

Histological analysis showed a constant dermal perivascular CD4⁺ lymphocyte infiltrate in skin biopsies of both blister (n = 17) and rubbed skin (n = 5), an epidermal infiltration of neutrophils and eosinophils in 70% of cases, and increased immunostaining for CXCL9 and CXCL10 in blistering skin. High levels of T helper 17 cytokines were detected in lesional skin. Three adult patients with EBS-gen sev were treated with apremilast, with a dramatic improvement of skin blistering and good tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the importance of inflammation in patients with EBS-gen sev and underlines the key role for T helper 17 cells in its pathogenesis. In addition, this study provides promising new therapeutic approaches for this disabling disorder.