Biophysical reviews: call for nominations for the 2023 Michèle Auger Award

This Editorial for Issue 3 (Vol. 14 2022) of Biophysical Reviews first describes the Issue's contents (five commentaries/editorials within the front matter and seven review/letter articles appearing within the main body) before going on to discuss a number of matters of potential importance to the journal and its readers. Amongst this second tranche of content is the opening of the call for nominations for the 2023 Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research.

Biophysical Reviews: focusing on an issue

This Issue of Biophysical Reviews (Volume 14, Issue 2) presents a new feature known as an 'Issue Focus' - a contiguous thematic block of five articles placed within a regular Issue format. The current 'Issue Focus' is concerned with the recent developments in Costa Rican biophysical science. The regular aspect of this Issue consists of a 'Meet the Editor' piece by Sabrina Leslie, the first instalment of an ongoing Commentary feature known as the 'Editors' Roundup', and five disparate review articles covering a variety of topics.

Improving the Quality of Paediatric ECG Interpretation

Aims Our aim was to complete an audit loop and identify whether implementing a paediatric ECG checklist improved the documentation and therefore the quality of paediatric ECG interpretation. We designed a paediatric ECG and education proforma in a Paediatric Emergency Department and incorporated it into daily practice. Methods We audited the medical records of children presenting with clinical indications for ECG. We included 40 records before and 40 records after the introduction of a paediatric ECG interpretation checklist. Results We assessed 10 items of documentation of which 8 related to the wave-form. Recording of these ranged from 0-65% before and from 95-100% after the checklist. Conclusion An intervention to introduce a paediatric ECG checklist, including education proforma, demonstrated significant improvement in the interpretation and documentation of a paediatric ECG. We recommend the use of this checklist in primary care and hospital settings.

Biophysical Reviews: from the umbra of 2020-2021 into the antumbra of 2022

This sub-Editorial for Volume 14 Issue 1 (2022) first makes comment on the current issue and then describes matters of interest related to the journal’s activities in 2022—chief among which are (i.) the announcement of the winner of the 2022 Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists’ Independent Research, (ii.) an outline of this year’s finalized Special Issue (SI) lineup, (iii.) a description of a new production service offered by Springer to those submitting to the Biophysical Reviews journal, and (iv.) an introduction of newly appointed members of the Biophysical Reviews’ Editorial Board.

Biophysical Reviews- 2021, the year that was

The current issue (volume 13 issue 6, 2021) is a Special Issue jointly dedicated to scientific content presented at the 20th triennial IUPAB Congress that was held in conjunction with both the 45th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Biophysical Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Biofísica - SBBf) and the 50th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Sociedade Brasileira de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular - SBBq). In addition to describing the scientific and nonscientific content arising from the meeting this sub-editorial also provides a look back at some of the high points for Biophysical Reviews in the year 2021 before going on to describe a number of matters of interest to readers of the journal in relation to the coming year of 2022.

Biophysical reviews-providing an effective critique

This Editorial for Volume 13, Issue 4 of Biophysical Reviews begins with an introduction to the invited Review contributed by the 2021 winner of "The Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research" (Assoc. Prof. Jorge Alegre-Cebollada). After providing a short summary of the other articles contained within the Issue, we discuss some additional matters important to the journal and its readers. In particular, this Editorial describes ongoing preparations for the upcoming IUPAB World Congress (October 4th-8th); it introduces two new Executive Editors from the UK and Spain; it describes the journal's placement in the latest SCIMago journal rankings, and it explains a new feature of the journal-"The Biophysical Reviews Historical Top Five". This piece closes with some thoughts about what might constitute a constructive critique of a manuscript.

Biophysical Reviews-A call to young biophysicists

This Editorial for Volume 13, Issue 3 of Biophysical Reviews begins with a summary of the Issue contents. This is then followed by a discussion of some additional matters important to the journal. In particular, this Editorial offers some thoughts as to what constitutes a good scientific Commentary before announcing the call for nominations for the 'The 2022 Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research'.

Biophysical Reviews: slowly getting back to 'normal'?

Run by the International Union for Pure and Applied Biophysics (IUPAB) and published by Springer Nature, Biophysical Reviews is an international journal dedicated to publishing topical review articles in the areas of (i) biology-related physics, (ii) structural biology, and (iii) molecular biology. This Editorial for Volume 13, Issue 2 of Biophysical Reviews provides a brief summary of the contents of the current Issue and then describes some matters important to the journal for 2021.

Stochastic modelling of the effects of human-mobility restriction and viral infection characteristics on the spread of COVID-19

After several months of "lockdown" as the sole answer to the COVID-19 pandemic, balancing the re-opening of society against the implementation of non-pharmaceutical measures needed for minimizing interpersonal contacts has become important. Here, we present a stochastic model that examines this problem. In our model, people are allowed to move between discrete positions on a one-dimensional grid with viral infection possible when two people are collocated at the same site. Our model features three sets of adjustable parameters, which characterize (i) viral transmission, (ii) viral detection, and (iii) degree of personal mobility, and as such, it is able to provide a qualitative assessment of the potential for second-wave infection outbreaks based on the timing, extent, and pattern of the lockdown relaxation strategies. Our results suggest that a full lockdown will yield the lowest number of infections (as anticipated) but we also found that when personal mobility exceeded a critical level, infections increased, quickly reaching a plateau that depended solely on the population density. Confinement was not effective if not accompanied by a detection/quarantine capacity surpassing 40% of the symptomatic patients. Finally, taking action to ensure a viral transmission probability of less than 0.4, which, in real life, may mean actions such as social distancing or mask-wearing, could be as effective as a soft lockdown.

Biophysical Reviews: 2020-looking back, going forward

After first describing the issue contents (Biophysical Reviews-Volume 12 Issue 6), this Editorial goes on to provide a short round-up of the activities of the journal in 2020. Directly following this Editorial are two obituaries marking the recent deaths of Prof. Fumio Oosawa (Japan) and Dr. Herbert Tabor (USA)-two major figures in Biophysical/Biochemical science from the last 100 years.

A simple method for modeling amyloid kinetics featuring position biased fiber breakage

A mathematical model of amyloid fiber formation is described that is able to simply specify different rates of fiber breakage at internal versus end regions. This Note presents the derivation of the relevant equations and provides results showing the dramatic effects of position biased fiber breakage on the kinetics of amyloid growth.

Biophysical Reviews: a Q1 ranked journal in biophysics and structural biology

This Editorial for Biophysical Reviews (Volume 12, Issue 5) begins with a description of the two feature articles. The first being the latest in the "Meet the Editors Series" describing Rosangela Itri-the Biophysical Reviews Executive Editor responsible for the South American region. The second feature article is by Alexandra Zidovska, the inaugural winner of the 2020 "Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research." Next highlighted are the Issue contents, which consist of five Commentaries/Letters and eleven Reviews. Finally, we conclude with a description of Biophysical Reviews' ascension within the world's major journal rankings index (Elsevier, Scimago)-becoming 12th overall (out of 156) within the biophysics category and receiving the coveted Q1 rating in both biophysics and structural biology sections.

Biophysics of human anatomy and physiology-a Special Issue in honor of Prof. Cristobal dos Remedios on the occasion of his 80th birthday

In 2001, Cristobal dos Remedios was made Professor of Anatomy (now emeritus) within Australia’s highest-ranked university (University of Sydney). For the majority of his career, he has examined the biomechanics and biophysics of human muscle contraction. To coincide with the occasion of his 80^th birthday, this Special Issue has commissioned a collection of review articles from experts exploring biophysical subjects within the general areas of human anatomy and physiology. After introducing the scope and contents of the Issue, we provide a short scientific biography, placing his scientific achievements within the context of the course of his life’s developments.

Biophysical Reviews-Quantitative analysis of biological phenomenon

This Editorial first describes the articles constituting the current Issue (Volume 12 Issue 3). It then goes on to outline the formal invitation procedure for those interested in submitting a review article to the journal. The Editorial concludes by describing the nomination process for the 2021 Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research.

Biophysical Reviews' national biophysical society partnership program

This Special Issue is focused on the Biophysical Society of Japan. It represents the first in a series tasked with introducing an individual national biophysical society to the wider biophysical community. In this Editorial for Volume 12 Issue 2, I first outline the nature and goals of this program before going on to describe the contents of the Special Issue that relate to the activities organized by the Biophysical Society of Japan and the scope of the research performed by its members.

A new decade for Biophysical Reviews and a look into the future of biophysics

This Editorial for Volume 12 Issue 1 first describes the contents of the current issue before informing on a few of the developments occurring in Biophysical Reviews during 2020. Notable items include the announcement of the (i) inaugural winner of the Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research and (ii) lineup of Special Issue topics for 2020. This Editorial concludes with a short forward-looking discussion piece on the future of biophysics as an increasingly important and vital sub-discipline of modern scientific research.

On the nature of the optimal form of the holdase-type chaperone stress response

The holdase paradigm of chaperone action involves preferential binding by the chaperone to the unfolded protein state, thereby preventing it from either, associating with other unstable proteins (to form large dysfunctional aggregates), or being degraded by the proteolytic machinery of the cell/organism. In this paper, we examine the necessary physical constraints imposed upon the holdase chaperone response in a cell-like environment and use these limitations to comment on the likely nature of the optimal form of chaperone response in vivo.