Effects of paclitaxel on the development of neuropathy and affective behaviors in the mouse

Paclitaxel, one of the most commonly used cancer chemotherapeutic drugs, effectively extends the progression-free survival of breast, lung, and ovarian cancer patients. However, paclitaxel and other chemotherapy drugs elicit peripheral nerve fiber dysfunction or degeneration that leads to peripheral neuropathy in a large proportion of cancer patients. Patients receiving chemotherapy also often experience changes in mood, including anxiety and depression. These somatic and affective disorders represent major dose-limiting side effects of chemotherapy. Consequently, the present study was designed to develop a preclinical model of paclitaxel-induced negative affective symptoms in order to identify treatment strategies and their underlying mechanisms of action. Intraperitoneal injections of paclitaxel (8 mg/kg) resulted in the development and maintenance of mechanical and cold allodynia. Carboplatin, another cancer chemotherapeutic drug that is often used in combination with paclitaxel, sensitized mice to the nociceptive effects of paclitaxel. Paclitaxel also induced anxiety-like behavior, as assessed in the novelty suppressed feeding and light/dark box tests. In addition, paclitaxel-treated mice displayed depression-like behavior during the forced swim test and an anhedonia-like state in the sucrose preference test. In summary, paclitaxel produced altered behaviors in assays modeling affective states in C57BL/6J male mice, while increases in nociceptive responses were longer in duration. The characterization of this preclinical model of chemotherapy-induced allodynia and affective symptoms, possibly related to neuropathic pain, provides the basis for determining the mechanism(s) underlying severe side effects elicited by paclitaxel, as well as for predicting the efficacy of potential therapeutic interventions.

Complications of intrathecal pump therapy in malignancy-related pain

102

Background: Intrathecal pumps (ITP) are used to manage severe malignancy related pain by delivering analgesics directly into the cerebrospinal fluid, in theory allowing for a reduced opioid dose and fewer complications. Although there is literature to support efficacy in patients with cancer, including improved survival, this mode of drug delivery also carries a risk of serious complications. Reports of complications in non-malignant pain suggest the risks and mortality related to ITP may be under-appreciated and that injury and liability occur with both ITP placement and ITP maintenance. Additional burdens to consider in patients with cancer include accurate prognostication to identify appropriate candidates, and the logistics of providing ITP maintenance. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 26 consecutive patients that underwent implantation of a programmable ITP at a National Cancer Institute center between 2008 and 2014 for malignancy related pain. Results: 53% (n = 14) of patients experienced major and minor ITP complications. Major complications occurred in 35% (9) including leg weakness post operatively requiring wheelchair use for months; granuloma formation causing leg weakness and requiring repeat operation; pump infection leading to sepsis and death; intra-abdominal abscess; significant bleeding requiring discontinuation of therapeutic anticoagulation for PE; and neurological complications including delirium and protracted seizures requiring ICU admission. Minor complications occurred in 31% (8) and included wound infections, urinary retention requiring catheterization, foot drop, and spinal headaches related to CSF leaks. 42% (11) died < 90 days after ITP implantation; 19% (5) died < 30 days after ITP implantation. 7 patients (27%) were either lost to follow up, relocated, transitioned to hospice, or had difficulty finding providers to refill the pump. Conclusions: More than a third of patients with cancer receiving an ITP at our institution experienced major complications including death, sepsis, and neurological problems.

Phase I Cancer Trials and Palliative Care: Antagonism, Irrelevance, or Synergy?

This article synthesizes the presentations and conclusions of an international symposium on Phase 1 oncology trials, palliative care, and ethics held in 2014. The purpose of the symposium was to discuss the intersection of three independent trends that unfolded in the past decade. First, large-scale reviews of hundreds of Phase I trials have indicated there is a relatively low risk of serious harm and some prospect of clinical benefit that can be meaningful to patients. Second, changes in the design and analysis of Phase I trials, the introduction of "targeted" investigational agents that are generally less toxic, and an increase in Phase I trials that combine two or more agents in a novel way have changed the conduct of these trials and decreased fears and apprehensions about participation. Third, the field of palliative care in cancer has expanded greatly, offering symptom management to late-stage cancer patients, and demonstrated that it is not mutually exclusive with disease-targeted therapies or clinical research. Opportunities for collaboration and further research at the intersection of Phase 1 oncology trials and palliative care are highlighted.

Identifying and assessing the risk of opioid abuse in patients with cancer: an integrative review

Background

The misuse and abuse of opioid medications in many developed nations is a health crisis, leading to increased health-system utilization, emergency department visits, and overdose deaths. There are also increasing concerns about opioid abuse and diversion in patients with cancer, even at the end of life.

Aims

To evaluate the current literature on opioid misuse and abuse, and more specifically the identification and assessment of opioid-abuse risk in patients with cancer. Our secondary aim is to offer the most current evidence of best clinical practice and suggest future directions for research.

Materials and methods

Our integrative review included a literature search using the key terms “identification and assessment of opioid abuse in cancer”, “advanced cancer and opioid abuse”, “hospice and opioid abuse”, and “palliative care and opioid abuse”. PubMed, PsycInfo, and Embase were supplemented by a manual search.

Results

We found 691 articles and eliminated 657, because they were predominantly non cancer populations or specifically excluded cancer patients. A total of 34 articles met our criteria, including case studies, case series, retrospective observational studies, and narrative reviews. The studies were categorized into screening questionnaires for opioid abuse or alcohol, urine drug screens to identify opioid misuse or abuse, prescription drug-monitoring programs, and the use of universal precautions.

Conclusion

Screening questionnaires and urine drug screens indicated at least one in five patients with cancer may be at risk of opioid-use disorder. Several studies demonstrated associations between high-risk patients and clinical outcomes, such as aberrant behavior, prolonged opioid use, higher morphine-equivalent daily dose, greater health care utilization, and symptom burden.

Embedding palliative care into bone marrow transplantation clinic

157

Background: Stem cell/bone marrow transplantation (SC/BMT) is intensive therapy that creates the potential for a number of physical and emotional symptoms. Despite the symptom burden and support needs of these patients there are no publications describing palliative care involvement in the course of treatment. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on 37 patients followed over a 6-month period by a palliative care service embedded within the SC/BMT clinic. Results: 37 patients were referred by SC/BMT clinic physicians or nurses to a palliative care team embedded within the clinic (including a physician, physical therapist, and psychologist). Almost all patients were referred for symptom management rather than goals of care; only three (9%) died during the review period and for none of them was the reason for consultation goals of care/hospice referral. Patients were seen between once and eight times during the six month period by various members of the team. Most (77%) were allogenic transplant patients and most were seen within 6 months of their transplantation. The most common reasons for referral were fatigue (57%), anorexia (27%), pain (38%) and depression and/or anxiety (35%). At initial assessment the highest-rated symptoms were lack of appetite (mean 4.78, SD 3.08), fatigue (4.51 [2.59]), and diminished feeling of well-being (4.16, [2.51]). At initial assessment, 73% of patients had 3 or more different symptoms that they rated at 4+; this dropped to 39.1% at follow-up (n = 23). Of the 9 symptoms assessed at both initial and follow-up visits, 7 decreased significantly (all but fatigue and dyspnea) and none increased. For example appetite improved from 5.52 (2.98) to 3.13 (2.96); pain improved from 3.52 (2.92) to 1.78 (1.88) (n = 23, p < .01). SC/BMT providers requested an expansion of the service after three months of experience. Conclusions: Patients who have undergone SC/BMT experience many physical and emotional symptoms. Palliative care embedded within the bone marrow transplant clinic can provide benefit by lessening the symptomatic burden of patients.

Hypermetabolism and symptom burden in advanced cancer patients evaluated in a cachexia clinic

BACKGROUND

Elevated resting energy expenditure (REE) may contribute to weight loss and symptom burden in cancer patients.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the velocity of weight loss, symptom burden (fatigue, insomnia, anxiety, and anorexia-combined score as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and survival among cancer patients referred to a cachexia clinic with hypermetabolism, elevated REE > 110% of predicted, with normal REE.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 60 advanced cancer patients evaluated in a cachexia clinic for either >5% weight loss or anorexia who underwent indirect calorimetry to measure REE. Patients were dichotomized to either elevated or normal REE. Descriptive statistics were generated, and a two-sample Student's t-tests were used to compare the outcomes between the groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methodology were used to examine the survival times between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (62%) were men, 41 (68%) were White, 59 (98%) solid tumours, predominantly 23 gastrointestinal cancers (38%), with a median age of 60 (95% confidence interval 57.0-62.9). Thirty-five patients (58%) were hypermetabolic. Non-Caucasian patients were more likely to have high REE [odds ratio = 6.17 (1.56, 24.8), P = 0.01]. No statistical difference regarding age, cancer type, gender, active treatment with chemotherapy, and/or radiation between hypermetabolic and normal REE was noted. The velocity of weight loss over a 3 month period (-8.5 kg vs. -7.2 kg, P = 0.68), C-reactive protein (37.3 vs. 55.6 mg/L, P = 0.70), symptom burden (4.2 vs. 4.5, P = 0.54), and survival (288 vs. 276 days, P = 0.68) was not significantly different between high vs. normal REE, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hypermetabolism is common in cancer patients with weight loss and noted to be more frequent in non-Caucasian patients. No association among velocity of weight loss, symptom burden, C-reactive protein, and survival was noted in advanced cancer patients with elevated REE.

Current and future care of patients with the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome

Many important advances have occurred in the field of cancer cachexia over the past decade, including progress in understanding the mechanisms of the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) and the development of promising pharmacologic and supportive care interventions. However, no approved agents for cancer cachexia currently exist, emphasizing the unmet need for an effective pharmacologic therapy. This article reviews the key elements of CACS assessment in daily practice, the contribution of nutritional impact symptoms (NIS), the evidence for current pharmacologic options, and promising anticachexia agents in perclinical and clinical trials. It also proposes a model for multimodality therapy and highlights issues pertinent to CACS in patients with pancreatic, gastric, and esophageal cancer.

A preliminary study of attitudes toward the assessment and management of cancer cachexia among medical oncologists and nurses

44

Background: A recent international consensus on the definition and classification of the cancer anorexia / cachexia syndrome (CACS) will facilitate clinical trial design, development of practice guidelines, and routine clinical management. Non-pharmacological interventions such as dietary counseling and promising new drugs have demonstrated improved outcomes in preliminary trials. Management of nutritional impact symptoms such as severe pain, depression, early satiety and chronic nausea also produce weight gain. These important advances contrast with the apparent low priority given to this condition by oncological societies worldwide. Our objective was to evaluate the attitudes of medical oncologists and nurses in the assessment and management of CACS in non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Surveys were administered electronically to US-based, community medical oncologists (n=76 respondents) and oncology nurses (n=25), members of the Sermo research database which includes over 275,000 active healthcare providers, pre-qualified through telephone or online screening. A proprietary MedPulse tool achieved random geographic distribution of respondents through a staged query–response process. Results: 67% of medical oncologists selected weight loss as the most important criterion for diagnosing CACS in their daily practice, consistent with the consensus definition. However, only 4% of respondents described CACS as inevitable or very likely to develop in patients maintaining good performance status through first-line therapy. Community providers identified the management of symptoms that affect appetite as very important (58.8%), important (31.4%) or somewhat important (7.8%), but only 9.8% indicated they currently use a formal tool to evaluate these symptoms. 72% would consider using a brief assessment tool in clinical practice. Conclusions: Our surveys suggest community oncologists recognize the core criteria for the diagnosis of CACS, although there may be under-recognition of the condition’s prevalence. There is considerable interest in adopting a brief symptom assessment tool for screening, management and referral of affected or at-risk patients.

The importance of communication about cachexia as experienced by patients and caregivers: A qualitative cross-cultural study

37

Background: Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome (CACS) is a multifactorial condition defined by an ongoing loss in body weight that cannot be fully reversed through conventional nutritional support and leads to progressive functional impairment. This condition has for a long time been misrecognized and underdiagnosed. Furthermore, the burden of CACS as experienced and depicted by patients and caregivers has not been deeply explored so far. Methods: This was a narrative qualitative cross-cultural study (IT, ES, UK, DE, US) based on the collection of 30 weekly emotional diaries followed by 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews to caregivers (i.e. relatives, partners, close friends) of patients diagnosed with CACS. The aim was to understand how the disease is experienced by patients and caregivers, their feelings and unmet needs. Results: Caregivers and patients demonstrate a poor knowledge of CACS: while they spontaneously refer to a pattern of CACS symptoms, they do not verbalize the term “cachexia”. The awareness and levels of engagement in managing CACS by caregivers appear to be dependent on the degree and timing of communication on this condition with the physician: those who express a higher sense of powerlessness and despair also report that their doctor has never explicitly mentioned CACS, nor indicated any strategies to manage it. On the other hand, those who appear more confident and engaged in managing CACS report a more detailed and earlier communication on the subject. Conclusions: Scarce and/or late communication on CACS and its management options with patients and caregivers may result in a sense of powerlessness and ignorance on how to manage its symptoms. In line with the recently reported importance of an early CACS recognition [(Aapro M et al, Ann Oncol (2014). 2014 May 2)], an earlier and thorough discussion about CACS with patients and caregivers would improve their level of engagement and help relieve some of their distress.

Assessment and Management of Chemical Coping in Patients With Cancer

Chemical coping is a working definition that describes patients' intake of opioids on a scale that spans the range between normal nonaddictive opioid use for pain all the way to opioid addiction. Most patients will fall somewhere between the two extremes in using opioid analgesics to cope with their psychological or spiritual distress. The degree to which patients use their medications in a maladaptive manner will determine their susceptibility to drug toxicity and harm. When there are no obvious cancer-related causes for increased pain intensity, chemical coping and other patient-related factors such as delirium, somatization, and depression should be considered. As part of the initial evaluation of patients with cancer-related pain, a brief screening tool such as the CAGE questionnaire should be used to identify patients who may be at risk for chemical coping. Identifying patients at risk will allow clinicians to avoid unnecessary opioid toxicity, control pain, and improve quality of life. A structured approach for managing opioid use should be adopted, including standardized documentation, opioid treatment agreements, urine drug screens, frequent visits, and restricted quantities of breakthrough opioids. All patients at risk should receive brief motivational interviewing with an objective, nonjudgmental, and empathic style that includes personalized feedback, particularly about markers of risk or harm. For chemical copers approaching the addiction end of the spectrum, with evidence of compulsive use and destructive behavior, referral should be made to substance abuse specialists.

Association between hypogonadism, symptom burden, and survival in male patients with advanced cancer

BACKGROUND

A high frequency of hypogonadism has been reported in male patients with advanced cancer. The current study was performed to evaluate the association between low testosterone levels, symptom burden, and survival in male patients with cancer.

METHODS

Of 131 consecutive male patients with cancer, 119 (91%) had an endocrine evaluation of total (TT), free (FT), and bioavailable testosterone (BT); high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP); vitamin B12; thyroid-stimulating hormone; 25-hydroxy vitamin D; and cortisol levels when presenting with symptoms of fatigue and/or anorexia-cachexia. Symptoms were evaluated by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. The authors examined the correlation using the Spearman test and survival with the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 64 years; the majority of patients were white (85 patients; 71%). The median TT level was 209 ng/dL (normal: ≥ 200 ng/dL), the median FT was 4.4 ng/dL (normal: ≥ 9 ng/dL), and the median BT was 22.0 ng/dL (normal: ≥ 61 ng/dL). Low TT, FT, and BT values were all associated with worse fatigue (P ≤ .04), poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P ≤ .05), weight loss (P ≤ .01), and opioid use (P ≤ .005). Low TT and FT were associated with increased anxiety (P ≤ .04), a decreased feeling of well-being (P ≤ .04), and increased dyspnea (P ≤ .05), whereas low BT was only found to be associated with anorexia (P = .05). Decreased TT, FT, and BT values were all found to be significantly associated with elevated CRP and low albumin and hemoglobin. On multivariate analysis, decreased survival was associated with low TT (hazards ratio [HR], 1.66; P = .034), declining Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR, 1.55; P = .004), high CRP (HR, 3.28; P < .001), and decreased albumin (HR, 2.52; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In male patients with cancer, low testosterone levels were associated with systemic inflammation, weight loss, increased symptom burden, and decreased survival. A high frequency of hypogonadism has been reported in male patients with advanced cancer. In the current study, an increased symptom burden, systemic inflammation, weight loss, opioid use, and poor survival were found to be associated with decreased testosterone levels in male patients with cancer. Cancer 2014;120:1586-1593. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Making the (business) case for outpatient and home-based palliative care for cancer patients

266

Background: Randomized controlled trials by Temel (2010) and Brumley (2003, 2007) have demonstrated the positive clinical, psycho-social, and utilization impact of providing early clinic or home-based palliative care (PC) concurrently with standard disease-focused treatment. Despite clear benefits, the growth of outpatient PC has been constrained by lack of clarity about the “business case” for hospitals or health systems to develop and fund PC services outside the inpatient setting. Methods: We will present findings from Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) that provide a compelling quantification of the risks for hospitals to continue “business as usual” in this changing environment. Our approach measures quality, quantity, and costs of care for patients with cancer over a period of 6-12 months prior to death. Performance on some of these measures impact revenues in the prevailing fee-for-service reimbursement model; others are utilized in national, public ratings of quality; and still others influence organizational ability to compete in the population health management model that rewards quality and efficiency over time. Results: We used these data to highlight VCU Health System’s exposure to financial risks to create a strong business case for outpatient palliative care in which patient-centered and hospital-centered outcomes are aligned. This approach elevated our proposal to be included in a broader strategic initiative by our health system to manage complex care more efficiently, and to manage population health more proactively. Our analytic approach was then replicated by a diverse group of California provider groups who adopted or adapted the VCU model to advance their community-based palliative care programs as part of the California Health Care Foundation’s “Palliative Care Action Community” initiative. Conclusions: Our analytic model and articulation of the business case for community-based palliative care can help others to create and sustain quality-driven, patient-centered, cost-effective PC programs in their own institutions.

A prospective study of family conferences: effects of patient presence on emotional expression and end-of-life discussions

CONTEXT

Limited research has taken place examining family conferences (FCs) with patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers in the palliative care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the FCs involving cancer patients in a palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center and examine the effects of patient participation on emotional expression by the participants and end-of-life discussions.

METHODS

A data collection sheet was completed immediately after 140 consecutive FCs that documented the number of participants, caregiver demographics, expressions of emotional distress, dissatisfaction with care, and the topics discussed. Patient demographics and discharge disposition also were collected.

RESULTS

Seventy (50%) patients were female, 64 (46%) were white, and 127 (91%) had solid tumors. Median age of patients was 59 years. Patients participated in 68 of 140 FCs (49%). Primary caregivers (n = 140) were female (66%), white (49%), and the spouse/partner (59%). Patients verbalized distress frequently (73%). Primary caregivers' verbal expression of emotional distress was high (82%) but not significantly affected by patient presence (82% vs. 82%, P = 0.936). Verbal expressions of emotional distress by other family members were more common when patients were absent (87%) than when present (73%), P = 0.037. Questions concerning advance directives (21%), symptoms anticipated at death (31%), and caregiver well-being (29%) were infrequent. Patient presence was significantly associated with increased discussions regarding goals of care (P = 0.009) and decreased communication concerning prognosis (P = 0.004) and what symptoms dying patients may experience (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was a high frequency of expression of emotional distress by patients and family members in FCs. Patient participation was significantly associated with decreased verbal emotional expression by family members but not the primary caregiver and was associated with fewer discussions regarding prognosis and what dying patients may experience.

Evaluating the impact of early versus late inpatient palliative care consultation for cancer patients

6638

Background: Access to specialist palliative care (hospital-based or hospice) is a recognized measure of quality in cancer care. Most cancer centers do have palliative care consult services, although the availability of a comprehensive program that includes a palliative care unit and outpatient clinic (Hui 2010) is inconsistent. A simultaneous integrated model of palliative care that facilitates earlier access to a specialized palliative care team may improve clinical outcomes. Palliative care programs should measure the access, timing and impact of their clinical service. Methods: Hospital claims data were linked to Social Security Death Index (SSDI) data from the US Department of Commerce. 3,128 adult cancer patients died between January 2009 and July 2011 and had contact with our inpatient palliative care team in their last six months of life. We determined whether IPC earlier than 1 month prior to death had an impact on hospitalizations, in-hospital mortality and referral to hospice. Results: 27.5% of cancer decedents accessed IPC, median of 22 days before death. 13.2% were discharged to hospice, median of 13 days before death. Patients with IPC earlier than 1 month until death were more likely to have hospice and fewer in-hospital deaths but there was no association between early IPC and a 30-day mortality admission. Conclusions: Palliative care services are accessed by a minority of patients and typically in the last 2-3 weeks of life. Although in-hospital deaths were reduced by earlier palliative care consultation, 30 day mortality did not improve. Hospitals may need to implement other strategies including early integration of outpatient palliative care among cancer patients, to achieve an impact on 30-day mortality admissions. [Table: see text]

Extreme hypothyroidism associated with sunitinib treatment for metastatic renal cancer

Although thyroid abnormalities are reported with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, patients rarely require replacement therapy. The initial multicentre studies of sunitinib for metastatic renal cancer did not report hypothyroidism in fatigued patients, and thyroid tests were not routinely monitored. More recent studies, however, suggest that up to 70% of patients develop thyroid test abnormalities during treatment with sunitinib. Despite these concerns, the clinical relevance of sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism is uncertain since thyroid gland recovery is the norm in most patients. We report a case of a patient with metastatic papillary renal cell cancer on combination anti-angiogenic therapy with sunitinib, who developed unusually high thyroid stimulating hormone levels and severe symptoms despite receiving L-thyroxine. Our case also illustrates the complexity of managing sunitinib-associated thyroid dysfunction, which may be accompanied by transient thyroiditis, hyperthyroidism, and profound hypothyroidism.

Effects of melatonin on appetite and other symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and cachexia: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

Prior studies have suggested that melatonin, a frequently used integrative medicine, can attenuate weight loss, anorexia, and fatigue in patients with cancer. These studies were limited by a lack of blinding and absence of placebo controls. The primary purpose of this study was to compare melatonin with placebo for appetite improvement in patients with cancer cachexia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind, 28-day trial of melatonin 20 mg versus placebo in patients with advanced lung or GI cancer, appetite scores ≥ 4 on a 0 to 10 scale (10 = worst appetite), and history of weight loss ≥ 5%. Assessments included weight, symptoms by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, and quality of life by the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire. Differences between groups from baseline to day 28 were analyzed using one-sided, two-sample t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests. Interim analysis halfway through the trial had a Lan-DeMets monitoring boundary with an O'Brien-Fleming stopping rule. Decision boundaries were to accept the null hypothesis of futility if the test statistic z < 0.39 (P ≥ .348) and reject the null hypothesis if z > 2.54 (P ≤ .0056).

RESULTS

After interim analysis of 48 patients, the study was closed for futility. There were no significant differences between groups for appetite (P = .78) or other symptoms, weight (P = .17), FAACT score (P = .95), toxicity, or survival from baseline to day 28.

CONCLUSION

In cachectic patients with advanced cancer, oral melatonin 20 mg at night did not improve appetite, weight, or quality of life compared with placebo.

Growth of an academic palliative medicine program: patient encounters and clinical burden

CONTEXT

Information regarding the challenges of clinical growth and staffing of palliative care programs is limited.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to describe the growth and staffing structure of a palliative care program at a comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS

During fiscal years ending in 2000 through 2010, we recorded all billed palliative care consultations and follow-ups. To determine the yearly clinical burden per physician, advanced practice nurse (APN), and physician assistant (PA), we calculated the mean number of patient encounters per clinical full-time equivalents. Increase in absolute number of patient encounters and relative (%) growth from year to year were calculated.

RESULTS

Over the 10-year history of the program, the number of outpatient consultations tripled, whereas the inpatient consultations increased from 73 to 1880. In all cases, with the exception of the first year of operation, the vast majority of clinical activity was in the inpatient hospital setting. Growth in the ratio of inpatient consultations per operational hospital beds was noted during the first five years of the program followed by a more modest increase in the succeeding five years. In fiscal year 2010, palliative care physicians had 6.2 patient encounters per working day, and APNs/PAs independently evaluated and treated 4.0 additional patients.

CONCLUSION

Over the 10-year history, there has been an increase in the number of patient consultations seen by our palliative care program. The clinical burden was manageable during the first three years but quickly became too burdensome. Active recruitment of new faculty was required to sustain the increased clinical activity.

Retrospective assessment of quality of cancer care in last 6 months of life

234

Background: National organizations such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Quality Forum (NQF) have developed metrics that assess the quality of cancer care. These metrics include consensus standards by the NQF for management of symptoms and end-of-life-care. Cancer centers need feasible methods for self-evaluating their performance on such metrics. Methods: Claims for our cancer patients were matched to Social Security Death Index data to determine date of death.3,128 adult cancer patients died between January 2009 and July 2011 and had at least 1 contact with our center in their last six month of life. All inpatient and outpatient claims data generated in the last six months of life at our hospital were analyzed. Results: 32% of patients had an admission in their last 30 days of life, with 15% dying in the hospital. 19% had at least one 30-day readmission in their last six months of life. 6.7% had chemotherapy in the 2 weeks prior to death, and 11.4% in the last month. 27.5% had some contact with the specialist palliative care (SPC) team. Solid tumor patients with SPC earlier than 1 month until death had fewer in-hospital deaths (15.6%) versus those with later or no SPC (19.5%), p=.041. There was no SPC difference for 30-day mortality, or 14- or 30-day chemotherapy metrics. Conclusions: Hospitals can self-evaluate their own performance on NQF endorsed measures, and CMS outcome measures. These data provide additional impetus for earlier integration of specialist palliative care teams. SPC in the last 1-3 weeks of life did not improve most utilization metrics.[Table: see text]

An analytic framework for capturing trends in utilization, costs, and quality metrics in cancer patients’ last 6 months of life

240

Background: Increasingly, reimbursement models are shifting to bundled payments and pay-for-performance models. While cancer care is often profitable for hospitals in the fee for service model, it is important to monitor outcomes that could influence reimbursement, such as 30-day readmissions; possible indicators of poor quality, such as 30-day mortality admissions; and to utilize longitudinal measures of costs and revenues. Methods: We evaluated trends in the outpatient and inpatient care at an academic cancer center for patients across their last 6 months of life. All-payor hospital claims data were linked to Social Security Death Index data to determine patients’ date of death even if they did not die in-hospital. All utilization at our center was analyzed for the 3,128 cancer patients who died between January 2009 and June 2011. Results: Admissions increased over the final six months, with sharp increases in ICU and total bed days in the final three months. 31% of admissions were 30-day re-admissions; 40% had a negative net margin; and all (1,178) in the final month were 30-day mortality admissions. 63% of hospice referrals occur in the final month. Conclusions: With each month this hospital is increasingly exposed to the risks of 30-day mortality and 30-day readmissions. Are the escalating costs and risks justified in terms of outcomes or quality? These findings reinforce the need for care practices that ensure that care is aligned with patient and family preferences, and that alternate care options are available and presented to patients and families in a timely fashion. [Table: see text]