The role of concomitant methotrexate dosage and maintenance over time in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with adalimumab or etanercept: retrospective analysis of a local registry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pattern of prescription and maintenance over time of concomitant methotrexate (MTX), and its impact on a 2-year clinical response in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with a first-line tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population included all RA patients receiving adalimumab or etanercept a as first-line biologic drug, extracted from a local registry. Enrolled patients were stratified into 3 subgroups according to baseline concomitant MTX: no MTX, low-dose MTX (≤10 mg/wk), and high-dose MTX (≥12.5 mg/wk). The 2-year persistence of the initial MTX regimen was computed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and a Cox proportional hazard model was developed to examine potential predictors of MTX withdrawal/change of dosage. European League Against Rheumatism remission and good-to-moderate response were evaluated according to baseline MTX regimen and MTX maintenance over time.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients (163 treated with adalimumab and 167 with etanercept) were included; 141 were prescribed TNFi without MTX and 112 received low-dose and 77 high-dose concomitant MTX. Male sex, younger age, and shorter mean disease duration were predictors of high-dose MTX use. Among MTX users (76.2% parenteral and 23.8% oral), initial MTX dose persisted over time in 79.9% at 1 year and 70.2% at 2 years. Fifty-one patients (27%) underwent MTX dose de-escalation/discontinuation because of intolerance/adverse events. The 2-year EULAR remission rate was higher in the patients receiving and maintaining high-dose MTX than in those receiving low-dose or no MTX (46.2% vs 29.5% and 23.4%, respectively; p=0.009). The same was true for good-to-moderate response rate (71.2% vs 52.6% and 50.4%, respectively; p=0.031).

CONCLUSION

In a real-life setting, about one-third of RA patients treated with TNFis experienced dose reduction/discontinuation of concomitant MTX because of intolerance/adverse events over a 2-year follow-up period. Initial high-dose MTX and its maintenance over time are associated with better 2-year clinical response.

Tocilizumab after a first-line with anti-TNF in rheumatoid arthritis: a cost-consequence analysis in the Italian setting

OBJECTIVES

Switching to a different mechanism of action in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after a first anti-TNF-α has proved to be effective. The objective of this study was a health economic assessment in Italy.

METHODS

The study was conducted using a pharmacoeconomic model with a 3-year time horizon. Effectiveness was measured as days gained in low disease activity (LDA; DAS28-ESR <3.2) or in remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6). The model simulated the response to treatments, based on the Rotation Or Change (ROC) trial, the probability of discontinuation and switch to a 3rd-line biologic, and the transition to death. Time on treatment curves for 2nd-line biologics were derived from published Italian real-word data. Costs were estimated based on published sources and Italian prices and tariffs.

RESULTS

The switch to tocilizumab after the failure of a first anti-TNF-α was more effective than a second anti-TNF-α, in terms of days in remission (224 vs. 114 days) and of days in LDA (345 vs. 193 days). The cost-consequence ratio with tocilizumab iv was 174 euros/day in remission and 113 euros/day in LDA. With tocilizumab sc the ratio was 181 euros/day in remission and 117 euros/day in LDA. The same ratios for the anti-TNF-α treatments ranged from 233 to Euro 320 euros per day in remission and from 138 to 190 euros per day in LDA.

CONCLUSIONS

The switch to a different mechanism of action, namely tocilizumab, after the failure of a first anti-TNF-α agent seems a rational strategy for RA patients in the Italian setting.

Prevalence of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease in a cohort of patients treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Treat to target (T2T), aiming at inactive disease (ID), has become the recommended strategy for axial-SpA (ax-SpA). Using the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), we assessed the prevalence of ID in ax-SpA patients treated with TNFα inhibitors (TNFi).

METHODS

A multicentric, cross-sectional study was performed assessing disease activity status (BASDAI and ASDAS) of consecutive patients with ax-SpA on stable treatment with TNFi for at least six months. We analyzed differences with nonradiographic axSpA (nr-ax-SpA) and the influence of population characteristics and comorbidities in reaching ID. ID was defined as ASDAS-CRP <1.3.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients were enrolled, 165 with AS and 53 with nr-ax-SpA. ASDAS-CRP ID was reached by 89 (40.8%) patients, while 163 (74.8%) of patients achieved good disease control with BASDAI. There were no significant differences between the two diagnostic groups. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated a negative correlation of concomitant fibromyalgia, higher BASMI and current NSAIDs with the chances of reaching ASDAS-CRP ID or BASDAI <4.

CONCLUSION

T2T represents a new challenge in the management of ax-SpA, with recently introduced disease activity measures being significantly more stringent. The prevalence of ID was affected by concomitant fibromyalgia, decreased spine mobility and concomitant NSAIDs.

Eight-Year Retention Rate of First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Spondyloarthritis: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 8-year survival of the first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), identify the predictive factors for withdrawal, and compare the discontinuation rates for infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab.

METHODS

We evaluated PsA and axial SpA patients treated with a first-line TNFi between 2005 and 2015 at 4 Italian tertiary centers. Eight-year drug survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk for discontinuation among treatment groups compared by stratified log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were developed to examine predictors of withdrawal.

RESULTS

Of 614 patients (316 axial with SpA, 298 with PsA), 203 received adalimumab, 131 etanercept, and 280 infliximab, with similar frequencies in axial SpA and PsA subgroups. The cumulative 8-year retention rate in the whole population was 55.1% (57.2% and 51.9% for axial SpA and PsA, respectively; P = not significant). No significant differences were observed in drug persistence among individual TNFi in either group. Male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 0.595 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.405-0.875]; P = 0.008) and concomitant methotrexate use (HR 0.648 [95% CI 0.426-0.985]; P = 0.042) were associated with a lower risk of withdrawal in PsA. High baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (HR 0.9842 [95% CI 0.9708-0.9980]; P = 0.028) was associated with a lower risk of withdrawal in axial SpA. No difference was found in the comparative analysis of reasons for discontinuation between PsA and axial SpA.

CONCLUSION

We reported that the real-life 8-year retention rate of the first TNFi in axial SpA and PsA is greater than 50%, with no significant differences between axial SpA and PsA, irrespective of the individual TNFi.

Comparison of efficacy of first- versus second-line adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience of the Italian biologics registries

OBJECTIVES

Targeted drugs against key pathogenetic molecules such as TNF-alpha have significantly improved outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They are widely used in clinical practice and drug registries give us information to support their use. Adalimumab (ADA) is able to induce a comprehensive disease control in RA by achieving clinical, functional and radiographic control.

METHODS

By interrogating 2 Italian registries, LORHEN and GISEA, we analysed the efficacy of ADA in first- or second-line in a total of 2262 RA patients.

RESULTS

Patients in 1st line were significantly older, with lower disease activity and HAQ scores compared to 2nd line. In 1st line, rates of DAS28-remission (DAS28rem) at 2 years were 34.4% while 26.5% in 2nd line (p=0.038). A normal HAQ score (HAQ≤0.5) was achieved in 53.5% after 2 years in 1st line versus 30.1% in 2nd (p<0.0001). DAS28rem+HAQ≤0.5, a combined parameter that we defined global clinical disease control, was reached in 20.7% in 1st line versus 13.3% in 2nd (p<0.01). Five-year-survival on therapy was higher for patients in 1st line (45.6% vs. 33.2%, p<0.0001). Discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was lower in 1st line (37.4 vs. 54.4%, p<0.0001). Rates of adverse events were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Responses in 1st line are generally significantly better than after a first anti-TNF-alpha failure but patients in 2nd line have a worse clinical and functional profile. A global disease control with clinical and functional remission is an achievable target in both lines.

A review of the literature analyzing benefits and concerns of infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases: focus on interchangeability

The introduction of biological agents drastically changed the treatment paradigm of inflammatory arthritides, ameliorating the natural history of the diseases but concomitantly increasing the drug costs due to the manufacturing process. On this concern, biosimilar drugs may represent a valid option for reducing this elevated cost and increasing the availability of these highly effective treatments. Recently, CT-P13, the first biosimilar of infliximab, has been approved with the same indications established for the reference product (RP), and its daily use is progressively increasing. However, the experience with biosimilar drugs in the field of rheumatology is still limited, raising potential doubts and concerns on their correct management in real-life settings. Comparability analysis between CT-P13 and its RP was evaluated in equivalence randomized controlled trials (RCTs) – PLANETRA and PLANETAS – performed on patients with rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondylitis, respectively. CT-P13 and RP showed similar profile in terms of quality, biological activity, safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. However, the interchangeability between infliximab RP and its biosimilar still represents the most challenging issue because of a lack of a long-lasting experience. To date, reassuring preliminary data on this topic were reported in open-label extensions of PLANETRA and PLANETAS RCTs and in ongoing real-life observational studies. These findings, taken all together, significantly affect the landscape of biosimilar regulatory pathways and strongly support CT-P13 introduction as a great opportunity for expanding the accessibility to these very effective and high-cost therapies.

Profile of sarilumab and its potential in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

In recent years the use of biotechnological agents has drastically revolutionized the therapeutic approach and the progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In particular, interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been demonstrated as a pivotal cytokine in the pathogenesis of the disease by contributing to both the innate and the adaptive immune system perturbation, and to the production of acute-phase proteins involved in the systemic expression of the disorder. The first marketed IL-6 blocker was tocilizumab, a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) monoclonal antibody. The successful use of tocilizumab in RA has encouraged the development of other biologic agents specifically targeting the IL-6 pathway, either directed against IL-6 cytokine (sirukumab, olokizumab, and clazakizumab) or IL-6 receptor (sarilumab). One Phase II and six Phase III randomized controlled trials demonstrated a broad efficacy of sarilumab across all RA patient subtypes, ranging from methotrexate (MTX) to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor insufficient responders. In particular, sarilumab as monotherapy demonstrated a clear head-to-head superiority over adalimumab in MTX-intolerant subjects. In addition, compared with tocilizumab, sarilumab showed a similar safety profile with significantly higher affinity and longer half-life, responsible for a reduction of the frequency of administration (every other week instead weekly). All these aspects may be important in defining the strategy for positioning sarilumab in the treatment algorithm of RA. Indeed, observational data coming from post-marketing real-life studies may provide crucial additional information for better understanding the role of sarilumab in the management of the disease. This review summarizes both the biological role of IL-6 in RA and the clinical data available on sarilumab as an alternative therapeutic option in RA patients.

Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

The Italian board for the TAilored BIOlogic therapy (ITABIO) reviewed the most consistent literature to indicate the best strategy for the second-line biologic choice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature to identify English-language articles on efficacy of second-line biologic choice in RA, PsA, and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data were extracted from available randomized, controlled trials, national biologic registries, national healthcare databases, post-marketing surveys, and open-label observational studies.

RESULTS

Some previously stated variables, including the patients׳ preference, the indication for anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monotherapy in potential childbearing women, and the intravenous route with dose titration in obese subjects resulted valid for all the three rheumatic conditions. In RA, golimumab as second-line biologic has the highest level of evidence in anti-TNF failure. The switching strategy is preferable for responder patients who experience an adverse event, whereas serious or class-specific side effects should be managed by the choice of a differently targeted drug. Secondary inadequate response to etanercept (ETN) should be treated with a biologic agent other than anti-TNF. After two or more anti-TNF failures, the swapping to a different mode of action is recommended. Among non-anti-TNF targeted biologics, to date rituximab (RTX) and tocilizumab (TCZ) have the strongest evidence of efficacy in the treatment of anti-TNF failures. In PsA and AS patients failing the first anti-TNF, the switch strategy to a second is advisable, taking in account the evidence of adalimumab efficacy in patients with uveitis. The severity of psoriasis, of articular involvement, and the predominance of enthesitis and/or dactylitis may drive the choice toward ustekinumab or secukinumab in PsA, and the latter in AS.

CONCLUSION

Taking in account the paucity of controlled trials, second-line biologic therapy may be reasonably optimized in patients with RA, SpA, and PsA.

Spotlight on mavrilimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence to date

The introduction of biological therapies into clinical practice has dramatically modified the natural history of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA is a systemic autoimmune disease that causes articular damage and has a great negative impact on patients’ quality of life. Despite the wide spectrum of available biological treatments, ~30% of RA patients are still unresponsive, resulting in high disability and increased morbidity and mortality. In the last few decades, the scientific knowledge on RA pathogenesis vastly improved, leading to the identification of new proinflammatory molecules as potential therapeutic targets. Several in vitro and in vivo studies showed that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), known to be a hematopoietic factor, is also one of the proinflammatory cytokines involved in macrophage activation, crucial for the pathogenic network of RA. Mavrilimumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the subunit α of GM-CSF receptor, was recently developed as a competitive antagonist of GM-CSF pathway and successfully adopted in human trials for mild to moderate RA. Mavrilimumab phase I and phase II studies reported an overall good efficacy and safety profile of the drug, and these encouraging results promoted the initiation of worldwide phase III studies. In particular, 158-week results of phase II trials did not show long-term lung toxicity, addressing the major concern about this target of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis development. However, further clinical studies conducted in larger RA populations are needed to confirm these promising results. This review summarizes the biological role of GM-CSF in RA and the preclinical and clinical data on mavrilimumab and other monoclonal antibodies targeted on this pathway as an alternative therapeutic option in RA patients who are unresponsive to conventional biological drugs.

Persistence, switch rates, drug consumption and costs of biological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study in Italy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this analysis was to provide an estimate of drug utilization indicators (persistence, switch rate and drug consumption) on biologics and the corresponding costs (drugs, admissions and specialist care) incurred by the Italian National Health Service in the management of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We conducted an observational retrospective cohort analysis using the administrative databases of three local health units. We considered all patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of RA and at least one biologic drug prescription between January 2010 and December 2012 (recruitment period). Persistence was defined as maintenance over the last 3 months of the follow-up period of the same biological therapy administered at the index date. A switch was defined as the presence of a biological therapy other than that administered at the index date during the last 3 months of the follow-up period. Hospital admissions (with a diagnosis of RA or other RA-related diagnoses), specialist outpatient services, instrumental diagnostics and pharmaceutical consumption were assessed.

RESULTS

The drug utilization analysis took into account only biologics with at least 90 patients on treatment at baseline (adalimumab n=144, etanercept n=236 and infliximab n=94). In each year, etanercept showed better persistence with initial treatment than adalimumab or infliximab. Etanercept was characterized by the lowest number of patients increasing the initial drug consumption (2.6%) and by the highest number of patients reducing the initial drug consumption (10.5%). The mean cost of treatment for a patient persisting with the initial treatment was €12,388 (€14,182 for adalimumab, €12,103 for etanercept and €11,002 for infliximab). The treatment costs for patients switching from initial treatment during the first year of follow-up were higher than for patients who did not switch (€12,710 vs. €11,332).

CONCLUSION

Persistence, switch rate and drug consumption seem to directly influence treatment costs. In subjects not persisting with initial treatment, other health care costs were approximately three times higher than for persistent patients. This difference could suggest a positive effect on the quality of life for persistent patients. Etanercept showed the highest persistence with treatment.

The 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease Questionnaire: Construct Validity, Reliability, and Interpretability in a Clinical Setting

Objective.

To study, in a real-life setting, the construct validity, the reliability, and the interpretability of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) questionnaire in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods.

In 144 consecutive patients with PsA (81 men and 63 women, mean age of 51.4 ± 12.8 yrs, and 77 receiving biologic treatment), the PsAID-12 and other patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were collected, such as the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Each patient underwent articular and skin assessment.

Results.

Construct validity: Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor result defined as the PsAID Symptom Score and the PsAID Skin Score. In determining convergent validity, significant correlations were found between the PsAID-12 and the clinical Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA; ρ = 0.867, p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that the PsAID-12 is determined by the articular disease activity (cDAPSA, p < 0.0001), severity of psoriasis (PsO; physician’s global assessment, p < 0.0001), and the presence of a coexisting fibromyalgia (FM; p < 0.0001). Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the total PsAID-12. Interpretability: Applying the cDAPSA categorization of disease activity states, the PsAID-12 cutoff values resulted in 1.4 between remission and low disease activity (LDA), 4.1 between LDA and moderate disease activity (MDA), and 6.7 between MDA and high disease activity.

Conclusion.

The PsAID-12 is an excellent PRO to evaluate the effect of PsA. It should be carefully handled in patients with coexisting FM.

The role of methotrexate as combination therapy with etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis: Retrospective analysis of a local registry

Objective

In a real-life setting, to analyse retrospectively the effects of different methotrexate regimens on etanercept efficacy during the first year of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

Demographic characteristics, clinical parameters and treatment data from patients with RA receiving the first-line biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, etanercept, as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate were analysed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The study population was stratified into three groups according to the level of concomitant methotrexate therapy: no methotrexate, low-dose methotrexate (≤ 10 mg/week) or high-dose methotrexate (>10 mg/week).

Results

Clinical response at 6 and 12 months and clinical outcome at 12 months were significantly better in patients concomitantly treated with high-dose methotrexate. Furthermore, this regimen was associated with the lowest discontinuation rate, suggesting a favourable safety profile.

Conclusion

These data confirm, in a real-life setting, the importance of methotrexate as a combination therapy with etanercept and suggest that the minimal effective dose of methotrexate is >10 mg/week.

Twelve-Year Retention Rate of First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Real-Life Data From a Local Registry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 12-year survival of the first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, comparing the between-groups discontinuation rates for infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab.

METHODS

RA patients treated with their first TNFi were investigated from a local registry. Before and after adjusting for propensity scores, overall and by individual TNFi 12-year drug retention was evaluated. Drug survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Cox extended model. Subanalyses were performed according to concomitant methotrexate (MTX) and discontinuation reasons.

RESULTS

Of 583 patients, 222 were treated with infliximab, 179 with etanercept, and 182 with adalimumab; 33.7% and 26% discontinued the first TNFi because of inefficacy or adverse events, respectively. The overall 12-year drug survival rate for the unmatched population was 23.4%. In the propensity score-adjusted population, the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment discontinuation was significantly greater for adalimumab and infliximab versus etanercept (HR 2.89 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.2-3.78] and HR 2.56 [95% CI 1.92-3.4], respectively), and no difference was found between and for adalimumab versus infliximab (HR 1.16 [95% CI 0.91-1.47]). The incidence of withdrawal due to secondary inefficacy was stable from 3 to 12 years for etanercept, but progressively increased for the monoclonal antibodies. Concomitant MTX significantly increased the survival of both adalimumab and etanercept (HR 1.48 [95% CI 1.18-1.86]).

CONCLUSION

The overall 12-year drug survival rate was 23.4%, being significantly higher for etanercept than adalimumab and infliximab. Etanercept discontinuations for inefficacy did not increase from 3 to 12 years. Concomitant MTX increased adalimumab and etanercept drug survival.

Drug survival of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 10 years in the real-world settings: high rate remission together with normal function ability

The purpose of the study was to estimate the clinical profile of naïve biological patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting adalimumab through 3-year calendar periods and their clinical outcomes such as drug survival and global clinical disease control (GCDC). RA patients starting adalimumab as first biological drug between 2003 and 2012 were subdivided in 3-year calendar periods. Survival on therapy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. One and 2-year clinical response was assessed by calculating percentage of patients attaining GCDC (28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) ≤ 2.6 + Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ≤ 0.5), low disease activity (DAS28 ≤ 3.2), remission (DAS28 ≤ 2.6) and good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response. Multivariate regression models were used to assess baseline predictors of drug discontinuation or achievement of clinical remission. We recruited 1695 RA patients. Overall drug persistence at 3 years was 40.6 %, while the global rate of nonswitching patients was 54.7 %. Compared to 2003-2005, initiators in more recent years had a significantly lower 3-year crude drug retention rate (log rank, p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher rate of switching to alternative biologics (log rank, p < 0.0001). No difference in adverse events or effectiveness rate among the calendar periods was found. A substantial proportion of patients (up to 27 %) achieved GCDC at 2 years, regardless of the calendar period. In real-life setting, RA patients starting adalimumab in more recent years had a higher rate of drug discontinuation not related to ineffectiveness or side effects but to switching, probably due to a wider availability of biologics. A meaningful proportion of patients attained GCDC without any difference across calendar periods.

Novel mechanisms of action of the biologicals in rheumatic diseases

Biological drugs targeting pro-inflammatory or co-stimulatory molecules or depleting lymphocyte subsets made a revolution in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. Their comparable efficacy in clinical trials raised the point of the heterogeneity of RA pathogenesis, suggesting that we are dealing with a syndrome rather than with a single disease. Several tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) blockers are available, and a burning question is whether they are biosimilar or not. The evidence of diverse biological effects in vitro is in line with the fact that a lack of efficacy to one TNF-α agent does not imply a non-response to another one. As proteins, biologicals are potentially immunogenic. It has been recently raised that anti-drug antibodies (ADA) may affect their bioavailability and eventually the clinical efficacy through local formation of immune complexes and directly by preventing the interaction between the drug and TNF-α. Regular monitoring of drug and ADA levels appears the best way to tailor anti-TNF-α therapies. Owing to the pleiotropic characteristics of the target, anti-TNF-α blockers may affect several mechanisms beyond rheumatoid synovitis. As TNF-α plays a pivotal role in the induction of early atherosclerosis, treatment with TNF-inhibitors may modulate cholesterol handling, in particular, cholesterol efflux from macrophages. Side effects are a major issue because of the systemic TNF-α blocking action. The efficacy of an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody fused to a peptide targeting inflamed synovia in experimental arthritis opened the way for new strategies: Homing to the synovium of molecules neutralizing TNF would allow to maximize the therapeutic action avoiding the side effects.

Structural integrity versus radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive and inflammatory disease often leading to irreversible destruction of articular structures and consequent disability. The key steps of RA pathogenetic mechanisms are the break of immune tolerance and the production of autoantibodies, followed by systemic and local inflammation resulting in damage of both subchondral bone (erosion) and cartilage (joint space narrowing (JSN)). Evidences from clinical trials suggest that erosions and JSN are the result of inter-related but partly independent pathogenetic pathways, in both cases mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, even if a direct effect of cyclic citrullinated peptides (anticitrullinated protein antibodies, ACPAs) on bone damage had been postulated. As a consequence, the suppression of inflammation provided by synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs results in a decreased progression of bone and cartilage damage, supporting the effectiveness of the treat-to-target strategy. Nevertheless, radiographic progression may also be detected in patients achieving a sustained clinical remission. Two main reasons for this apparent uncoupling between clinical synovitis and damage progression should be considered. First, in some cases, the use of composite indices to define remission may not be completely adequate to identify residual disease activity, requiring the concomitant introduction of more sensible tools such as imaging. Second, the direct effect of biological drugs on bone destruction inducers, such as pro-inflammatory cytokines, may explain the suppression of radiographic progression despite the persistence of clinical synovitis. In this review, we discuss the link between autoimmunity, inflammation, joint damage and disability, focusing on how radiographic progression may predict functional disability.

Obesity and reduction of the response rate to anti-tumor necrosis factor α in rheumatoid arthritis: an approach to a personalized medicine

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a mild, long-lasting inflammatory disease and, as such, could increase the inflammatory burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study aim was to determine whether obesity represents a risk factor for a poor remission rate in RA patients requiring anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) therapy for progressive and active disease despite treatment with methotrexate or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

METHODS

Patients were identified from 15 outpatient clinics of university hospitals and hospitals in Italy taking part in the Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Early Arthritis network. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), body mass index (BMI; categorized as <25, 25-30, and >30 kg/m(2) ), acute-phase reactants, IgM rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody values were collected. DAS28 remission was defined as a score of <2.6 lasting for at least 3 months.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-one outpatients with longstanding RA receiving anti-TNFα blockers (adalimumab, n = 260; etanercept, n = 227; infliximab, n = 154), recruited from 2006-2009 and monitored for at least 12 months, were analyzed. The mean ± SD DAS28 at baseline was 5.6 ± 1.4. A BMI of >30 kg/m(2) was recorded in 66 (10.3%) of 641 RA patients. After 12 months of anti-TNFα treatment, a DAS28 of <2.6 was noted in 15.2% of the obese subjects, in 30.4% of the patients with a BMI of 25-30 kg/m(2) , and in 32.9% of the patients with a BMI of <25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.01). The lowest percentage of remission, which was statistically significant versus adalimumab and etanercept (P = 0.003), was observed with infliximab.

CONCLUSION

Obesity represents a risk factor for a poor remission rate in patients with longstanding RA treated with anti-TNFα agents. A personalized treatment plan might be a possible solution.

The role of biologic agents in damage progression in rheumatoid arthritis: indirect comparison of data coming from randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

All biologic agents approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been tested versus methotrexate (MTX) for efficacy on damage progression in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but direct head-to-head comparisons have never been conducted. The purpose of this investigation is to analyse data coming from main RA RCTs and to perform an indirect comparison.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature from 1988 to 2011 was conducted. Only randomized, double-blind, controlled, comparative trials, with evaluation of radiographic progression were included. The radiographic score was standardized and mean difference in the percentage of the annual radiographic progression rate was used as the effect measure. Heterogeneity between studies was estimated by I(2) test. For each trial, the effect was plotted according to its standard error in a funnel plot.

RESULTS

Of 44 potentially relevant trials, 12 RCTs were included in the study. In order to optimize RCTs comparison, studies were stratified in early and late RA group. Main population characteristics were similar in both early and late RA groups, whereas the standardized baseline radiographic score value significantly differs among trials in both early (range 2.7-21.9) and late (range 23.46-75) RA groups. The standardized annual estimated progression is similar across the late RA group. Strong evidence of heterogeneity (I(2) = 97%, p = 0.00001) but no asymmetry of the funnel plot was observed in the early RA group. Total mean difference was -16.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] -24.42 to -8.14). For the late RA group a random model was used (I(2) = 99%, p = 0.00001) and a total mean difference of -39.25 (95% CI -53.77 to -24.73) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

All biologic agents provide a favourable effect on disease progression both in early and late RA. The significant heterogeneity among various RCTs did not allow an effective comparison of the performance of biologic agents in each study.

Efficacy and safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF agents in elderly (aged >or=65 years) and younger patients (aged 18-65 years) with active RA. The study involved 1,114 RA patients treated with anti-TNF drugs and followed-up for >6 months by LORHEN group, who were divided into two cohorts on the basis of their age (311 aged >or=65 and 803 aged <65 years) in order to evaluate 3-year outcomes and treatment discontinuations. Drug effectiveness was assessed by disease activity (DAS28 and EULAR response), functional status (HAQ) and serological parameters (ESR) at baseline and during anti-TNFalpha therapy; safety was evaluated on the basis of drug discontinuation rates. At baseline, the elderly patients showed greater disease activity (DAS28, ESR) and loss of joint function (HAQ, functional class; p < 0.05). During therapy, clinical and laboratory parameters (DAS28, ESR) improved in both groups without any statistically significant difference between them, whereas the difference in HAQ remained after 36 months of treatment (p < 0.05). Anti-TNFalpha therapy was discontinued by 123 of the elderly (42%) and 282 of the younger patients (36.6%) because of loss of efficacy (17.4% vs. 16.7%), severe adverse events (21.8% vs. 16.9%) or other reasons (2.7% vs. 3%). The number of adverse events was significantly higher in the elderly patients (p < 0.05). Anti-TNFalpha treatment reduced disease activity and led to functional improvement in both groups, although the baseline difference in HAQ remained statistically significant at the end of the follow-up. The elderly patients experienced more infective events.

TNF-alpha antagonist survival rate in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients observed under conditions of standard clinical practice

A cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LOHREN) registry and receiving anti-TNF therapy was evaluated after 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Of the 1114 patients in the registry 1064 met the clinical criteria for inclusion with 519 receiving infliximab, 303 adalimumab, and 242 etanercept. The therapeutic survival curve of these patients showed that the likelihood of continuing anti-TNF therapy was 78.8% after 12 months, 65.2% after 24 months, and 52.9% after 36 months, with a risk of dropout similar for inefficacy and adverse events. There were 405 anti-TNF therapy discontinuations (38.1%): 180 (16.9%) due to inefficacy, 194 (18.2%) adverse events, and 31 (2.9%) other reasons. Four deaths (2 septicemia, 1 postinfective cerebritis, 1 heart failure) were considered to be related to anti-TNF therapy. Of the discontinuations, 219 (54.1%) occurred within the first 12 months: 110 due to adverse events, 89 inefficacy, and 20 due to other reasons. After 36 months, the likelihood of survival on etanercept (62.5%) was significantly greater than the likelihood of survival on infliximab (49.1%) or adalimumab (53.6%). A higher risk of therapy discontinuations due to adverse events was associated with increasing age, a corticosteroid > 5 mg/day, a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), a higher risk of therapy discontinuations due to inefficacy was associated with the previous use of > or = 4 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and a high ESR. Comorbidities, increasing DAS28 values and co-therapy with methotrexate were associated with a lower risk of discontinuation.

Tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapy and cancer development: analysis of the LORHEN registry

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare cancer risk in a RA cohort population treated with TNF antagonists, and identify the characteristics of the patients at higher risk.

METHODS

The study involved 1114 RA patients treated with anti-TNF agents after failing to respond to traditional DMARDs, 1064 of whom were evaluable for adverse events over an average observational period of 23.32 months. The relative cancer risks (expressed as hazard ratios) in the anti-TNF treated patients were estimated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The rate of cancer in this cohort was compared with that in the general population using data from the Varese and Milan Cancer Report.

RESULTS

There were 18 incident cases (1.7%), 4 of which involved lymphomas. Comparison with the general population showed that the overall cancer risk was similar, but the risk of lymphoma was about five times higher in the RA patients treated with a biological agent. Higher RR were found in males (HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.97-12.48; p=0.001) and patients aged >65 years (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.08-6.84; p=0.034); combined therapy with methotrexate seemed to be protective (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.87; p=0.026).

CONCLUSION

The overall cancer risk in RA patients treated with anti-TNF seemed to be similar to that in the general population in the same geographical area, but the risk of haematological cancer was significantly greater. The demographic and clinical factors associated with a higher risk of cancer in our cohort were male gender and an age of >65 years.

Efficacy and safety of anti-TNF agents in the Lombardy rheumatoid arthritis network (LORHEN)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic synovitis and bone damages, which consist of joint destruction. Clinical trials have shown that anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs are effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). At about the same time as the European approval of the third anti-TNF agent for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the Italian Society of Rheumatology (Società Italiana di Reumatologia [SIR]) started a database for the registration and active follow-up of patients with RA treated with biological response modifiers. Since 1999, all patients with RA (ACR criteria) and treated with at least one dose of an anti-TNF agent at four Rheumatology Centres in Lombardy (northwest Italy) have been included in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) registry in order to track the efficacy and safety of the three available TNF inhibitors during the first three years of treatment.

Serious infections during anti-TNFalpha treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients

The objective was to estimate the incidence of serious infections in the patients treated with anti-TNFalpha agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recorded in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) registry. The study inclusion criteria were met by 1064 of the 1114 patients with long-standing RA, 519 treated with infliximab, 303 with adalimumab, and 242 with etanercept; their mean age was 55.8 years and the mean duration of RA 9.4 years. Seventy-three patients (6.9%) experienced a total of 74 serious infections, an incidence rate for all treatment courses of 35.9 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 27.66-44.13). Most were lower respiratory tract (34.2%) or skin and soft tissue infections (20.5%). Of the 1064 patients, the 790 treated with anti-TNFalpha after March 2002 underwent screening tests for LTBI; five patients developed active tuberculosis. Three patients died of septic shock. The type of anti-TNFalpha agent did not seem to affect the incidence or site of the infections. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified age at the start of anti-TNFalpha treatment (p=0.008), baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate ([ESR] p=0.014), and the concomitant use of corticosteroids (p=0.029) as significant predictors of infections. There was no statistically significant difference in risk between the anti-TNFalpha agents.

Pattern of use, economic burden and vial optimization of infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis in Italy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively examine the pattern of utilization in clinical practice and the costs of therapy of infliximab in the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Ninety-five RA patients (22 newly treated and 73 maintenance patients) who received at least one infliximab infusion during a selected observation period of one year were studied. After induction phase, infliximab was given at initial dose of 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Based on clinical efficacy measured by Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) index, dose adjustments were performed by increasing pro kg dose and/or reducing infusion interval. Overall one-year's treatment costs were also examined.

RESULTS

Sixteen (17%) out of 95 patients discontinued treatment before the end of the study owing to lack of efficacy (15) or adverse events (1). Thirteen (59%) out of 22 newly treated patients experienced treatment escalation in the first year of therapy by increasing dose (13.6%), reducing interval (9%), or both (36.3%). The mean infliximab dose administered to all the patients was 3.57 mg/kg and the mean infusion interval was 50 days. Considering all expenditure items, the mean year treatment cost per patient was euro 8454,65. Infliximab vial optimization allows us to reduce this amount to euro 7505,85, with a significant saving of euro 948,80 per patient/year.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, adjustments in infliximab treatment in the first year of therapy were common. Despite dose escalation, the mean dosing schedule does not significantly differ from those recommended in the product label. The cost of treatment could be reduced by using infliximab vial optimization.

Drug-induced agranulocytosis during treatment with infliximab in enteropathic spondyloarthropathy

Agranulocytosis is a disorder characterized by a severe decrease in the number of granulocytes in blood, that frequently occurs as an adverse reaction to some drugs. By now, there are no reports in literature of agranulocytosis caused by tumur necrosis factor-alpha blockers. We describe the case of a 20-year-old Caucasian male affected by enteropathic (Crohn's disease) spondyloarthropathy HLA B27 negative, successfully treated with infliximab. After the second infliximab infusion, he was found to have a severe transient neutropenia (0.5 x 10(9)/L). Routine serum chemistry and full blood cell count (apart from neutrophil count) were normal. Serology excluded an active infection. Bone marrow needle aspirate showed a normal trilineage differentiation. Autoantibody assessment showed negative ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-ENA, and ANCA, but positive granulocyte-bound antibodies (GBA) and neutrophil-specific (CD 16+)-bound antibodies (anti-NA). Ten weeks after infliximab infusion, neutrophil count and GBA and anti-NA assay returned spontaneously within normal range and we observed the same progress after every successive infliximab infusion we performed. These data indicated that infliximab possibly triggered production of granulocyte and neutrophil autoantibodies with resultant autoimmune agranulocytosis.

Drug-induced lupus following treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis

After introduction of infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there have been many reports of patients developing asymptomatic higher rate of antinuclear antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies than in non-infliximab-treated patients. However, only five clinical drug-induced lupus (DIL) cases have been documented following treatment with infliximab, in RA and in Crohn's diseases. We report a case of a 69-year-old female with a 5 year history of RA, whowas successfully treated with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (initially 3 mg/kg and from the fourth infusion 5 mg/kg) for 23 weeks. Before the sixth infusion, she was diagnosed with DIL by both clinical features (fever > 38 degrees C, recurrence of active synovitis, myalgia, erythematous rash and general malaise) and laboratory findings (antinuclear antibodies 1:160, anti-double-stranded DNA positive by ELISA assay, decreased serum complement C3 andC4, hypergammaglobulinaemia, increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate). After discontinuation of treatment and therapy with oral prednisone, lupus resolved within 8 weeks.