Serial 18F-choline-PET imaging in patients receiving enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: response assessment and imaging biomarkers

AIM

High rate of non-target lesions in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer usually limits applicability of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and this has led to a growing interest in using PET/computed tomography (CT). We prospectively investigated the role of (18)F-choline (FCH)-PET/CT in patients receiving enzalutamide after docetaxel.

PATIENTS & METHODS

30 patients were monitored by means of FCH-PET/CT before and during the treatment. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the associations between metabolic parameters and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between biochemical and FCH-PET responses. Multivariate analysis showed that only baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) significantly correlated with biochemical progression-free survival, radiological progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that FCH-PET/CT may play a role in defining prognosis of patients receiving enzalutamide because baseline SUVmax proved to be an independent prognostic factor.

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) pts receiving a new agent (NA)-based third line treatment: Preliminary results from a multicenter Italian study

211

Background: The NLR is a marker of systemic inflammatory response: several studies investigated its prognostic relevance in mCRPC but to date no information is available concerning this issue in pts treated in third line therapy. The present study is aimed to assess the possible relationship between third line clinical outcome and NLR in a large series of mCRPC pts treated with a NA [abiraterone acetate (AA), cabazitaxel (CABA), or enzalutamide (ENZ)] after the failure of docetaxel (DOC) and another NA. Methods: We collected data of pts who received sequentially two NAs after DOC in 38 Italian hospitals. For each pt we recorded the clinical outcome of all treatments received after DOC. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the independent prognostic value of a series of pretreatment covariates, in terms of overall survival (OS), comprising NLR. Results: A consecutive series of 291 mCRPC pts with bone (88%), nodal (53%) or visceral (18%) mets, was collected. All pts received a NA-based third line: 90 received AA, 123 CABA and 78 ENZ. At the time of this analysis, data on NLR were available for 198 pts (68%): AA 68 (75%) – CABA 80 (65%) – ENZ 50 (64%): the median value was 3.1 (IQR 2.2-4.7). In the univariate analyses, the NLR as a discrete variable using the median value of 3.1 as threshold, was significantly associated with both OS and progression free survival (PFS), calculated from the third line start (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively). No association was observed with either biochemical or objective response. These results were confirmed at the multivariate analysis. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median OS from the start of third-line was higher (18.2 vs 8.1 mos) in pts with NLR ≤ 3.1 compared to those with NLR > 3.1 (log-rank; P < 0.0001). Similarly, the median PFS was 6.3 and 3.5 in pts with NLR ≤ 3.1 and > 3.1, respectively. Conclusions: At the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the NLR value in mCRPC third line treatment. From our preliminary data, it appears that NLR may be a prognostic and predictive factor in mCRPC pts, treated with NA-based third line.

Is metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCTX) a therapeutic option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) in the era of new agents (NAs)? A retrospective multicenter Italian study

326

Background: Several NAs, such as abiraterone acetate (AA), cabazitaxel (CABA), and enzalutamide (ENZ), are able to significantly prolong mCRPC pts survival after docetaxel (DOC) failure. Nevertheless, all pts eventually show progressive disease with NAs and several pts may require further treatment. mCTX was considered as a feasible and tolerable therapeutic option after DOC failure before the introduction of NAs in the clinical practice. The present retrospective study describes the clinical outcomes of mCTX, used in mCRPC pts after the failure of both DOC and at least one NA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all mCRPC pts treated in 8 Italian hospitals after the introduction of NAs in the clinical practice. We considered as eligible for the present analysis all pts who received mCTX after DOC and at least one NA. All pts were treated with CTX 50 mg po daily until disease progression. Results: From December 2011 to June 2015, a consecutive series of 48 mCRPC pts, median age 72 yrs (56-90), with bone (94%), nodal (67%) or visceral (25%) mets, was treated with mCTX. All pts have previously received a DOC-based chemotherapy followed by only one NA in 21 cases, two NAs in 20, and all three NAs in 7. The median duration of the treatment was 10.4 wks (range 3.6-61.1). Recorded grade 3-4 toxicities were: anemia (5 pts), leucopenia (1), thrombocytopenia (2), fatigue (2), and anorexia (1). Seven pts (14%) achieved a PSA reduction ≥ 50% and 2 (4%) an objective response. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.5 mos with 7 pts (14%) showing a PFS ≥ 9 mos. The median overall survival was 6.9 mos. Conclusions: In our experience, mCTX was a feasible and well tolerated therapeutic option in heavily pre-treated pts with very advanced mCRPC. Despite its activity was limited, the clinical outcomes of this cheap treatment are similar to those observed with NAs administered in third/fourth line with a quote of pts experiencing a prolonged disease control. Prospective studies are needed to define the therapeutic role of mCTX after NAs in mCRPC pts.

Long-term outcomes and predictive factors in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) showing abiraterone withdrawal syndrome (AWS) after docetaxel (DOC) treatment

324

Background: AWS has been rarely described as a possible PSA reduction, with or without radiological responses, observed after abiraterone acetate (AA) suspension due to disease progression. According to this possibility, all pts progressing under AA were usually monitored for at least 4 wks to evaluate if they developed AWS; if PSA decreased, the subsequent treatment was delayed until the occurrence of biochemical and/or radiological progression. The present study is aimed to assess long-term outcomes and predictive factors in DOC pre-treated mCRPC pts experiencing AWS. Methods: We evaluated a consecutive series of 73 pre-treated mCRPC pts, who received AA in our Hospital after DOC failure: all pts were treated with AA 1,000 mg po + prednisone 10 mg po daily; the treatment continued until progression disease (PD) which required to be confirmed by imaging. For each pt we have recorded the pre and post-AA clinical history, the treatment details and outcomes. All pts stopped AA due to progressive disease and AWS was defined by PSA reduction ≥ 25%, compared to the AA-end values, observed in the first month after AA stop. A logistic regression analysis was performed in order to assess the ability of a series of 18 selected clinical factors to predict AWS. Results: AWS was observed in 7 pts (9.5%) with a median duration of 17 wks (range 9-33). Two pts undergoing the 3-monthly radiographic restaging showed an objective response. A significant difference in terms of post-AA median OS was observed between AWS- and AWS+ pts (3.6 vs 27.9 mos; p = 0.02); this differences was confirmed by 1-month landmark analysis (4.6 vs 27.9 mos; p = 0.03). Among the factors, only the absence of pain at AA therapy baseline was able to predict the AWS: 100% of AWS+ pts were asymptomatic, compared to 64.6% of AWS- pts (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Despite AWS remains an unpredictable and rare phenomenon, it could represent a chance to delay the start of subsequent therapeutic line after AA failure. Moreover, our results seem to suggest that the occurrence of AWS may have a positive impact on the OS of mCRPC pts.

Does abiraterone withdrawal syndrome (AWS) exist also in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) first-line setting?

344

Background: AWS is a recently phenomenon observed in mCRPC patients (pts) characterized by a PSA reduction with or without objective response after abiraterone acetate (AA) discontinuation. This syndrome has clinical features similar to antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome and was described in pts who treated with AA in the post-docetaxel setting. At the best of our knowledge, to date AWS was never described in chemo-naïve mCRPC pts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of mCRPC pts treated with first-line AA at our Institution. All pts were treated with AA 1,000 mg + prednisone (PDN) 10 mg po daily; the treatment was continued until progression disease (PD) which required an imaging confirmation too. After PD, we also discontinued the PDN administration. For each pt we recorded pre and post-AA clinical history, treatment details and outcomes. AWS was defined by PSA reduction ≥ 25% compared to the AA-end values observed in the first month after AA stop. Results: From September 2014, eight pts received first-line AA and, to date, 6 patients (75%) who discontinued the treatment due to PD are evaluable for AWS occurrence. We observed an AWS in 2/6 (33.3%). The first patient, a 76 year-old man, who experienced a PD after 12 wks AA treatment, had a 69% reduction in PSA with PSA dropping from 60 ng/mL to 19.47 ng/mL after about 30 days from the discontinuation. The second patient, 83 years old, treated with AA for 12 weeks, had a reduction in PSA from 112.2 ng/mL to 55 ng/mL at one-month (51% reduction) and to 35.36 ng/mL at two months (68.5% reduction) after AA and PDN discontinuation; after 9 wks the AWS is still ongoing. Conclusions: Notwithstanding the limits of the small sample size, our data shows for the first time that AWS can be observed also in mCRPC patients receiving AA as first-line treatment. Larger observations are needed to establish frequency and clinical role of this phenomenon. Although pathogenetic mechanisms and predictive factors are still unclear, AWS may represent a possibility to delay the second line start for mCRPC pts.

Clinicians’ attitudes and preferences in choosing the first line drug for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Preliminary results from a multicenter Italian study after the introduction of abiraterone acetate (AA) in the clinical practice

332

Background: For one decade, docetaxel (DOC) represented the only therapeutic option for mCRPC pts. Recently, AA and enzalutamide demonstrated a survival gain in first line setting. Lacking direct comparison with DOC and considering some differences in selection criteria of the pivotal trials, the choice between DOC and these hormonal agents, which have a quite different toxicity profile, is often driven by pts’ characteristics and feelings and by clinicians’ attitudes and preferences as well. To date, only AA is available in Italy, from September 2014, for the first line setting and the present study explores the attitudes and preferences of clinicians in choosing between DOC and AA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all mCRPC pts who received a first-line treatment in 5 Italian hospitals after the introduction of AA in the clinical practice. All pts were treated with AA 1,000 mg po + prednisone (PDN) 10 mg po daily or with DOC at the dose of 75 mg/sqm i.v. every three wks. For each pt we have recorded the pre-first line clinical history and the baseline characteristics. Results: From September 2014 to August 2015, we collected a consecutive series of 70 mCRPC pts: 49 received AA, 21 DOC. The median age was 74 yrs (range 46-90), 6% had visceral mets; 8% had a performance status 2; 47% had pain. Pts treated with AA were significantly older (75.8 vs 69.7 yrs; p = 0.002); received more previous hormone therapies (2.19 vs 1.76; p = 0.03), had a longer interval between first hormone therapy and the start of mCRPC first line (47.6 vs 21.2 mos; p = 0.01) and finally, were less frequently symptomatic (27% vs 67%; p = 0.02%). Conclusions: The present study is the first to explore the clinicians’ attitudes and preferences, in the routine clinical practice, in choosing the first line drug for mCRPC pts. From our preliminary data, it appears that some pts characteristics are important in driving the choice of the clinicians between AA and DOC. Data collection is ongoing in other Italian hospitals.

Intermittent docetaxel chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

AIMS

The intermittent administration of chemotherapy is a means of preserving patients' quality of life (QL). The aim of this study was to verify whether the intermittent administration of docetaxel (DOC) improves the patients' QL.

PATIENTS & METHODS

All patients received DOC 70 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for eight cycles. The patients were randomized to receive DOC continuously or with a fixed 3-month interval after the first four DOC courses.

RESULTS

The study involved 148 patients. There was no difference in QL between the groups receiving intermittent or continuous treatment. Intermittence had no detrimental effects on disease control.

CONCLUSION

Although feasible and not detrimental, our results showed that true intermittent chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients failed to improve the patients' QL.

Impact of post-implant dosimetric parameters on the quality of life of patients treated with low-dose rate brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: results of a single-institution study

Background

To assess the relationship between dosimetric parameters and the quality of life (QL) outcomes of patients with low-intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer (LPC) treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT).

Materials and methods

We evaluated the participants in two consecutive prospective studies of the QL of patients treated with LDR-BT for LPC. QL was evaluated by means of a patient-completed questionnaire assessing non functional [physical (PHY) and psychological (PSY) well-being, physical autonomy (POW), social relationships (REL)] and functional scales [urinary (URI), rectal (REC), and sexual (SEX) function]; a scale for erectile function (ERE) was included in the second study. Urethra (D10 ≤ 210 Gy) and rectal wall constraints (V100 ≤ 0.5 cc) were used for pre-planning dosimetry and were assessed with post planning computerized tomography one month later for each patient.

Results

QL was assessed in 251 LPC patients. Dosimetry did not influence the non-functional scales. As expected, a progressive impairment in sexual and erectile function was reported one month after LDR-BT, and became statistically significant after the third year. Rectal function significantly worsened after LDR-BT, but the differences progressively decreased after the 1-year assessment. Overall urinary function significantly worsened immediately after LDR-BT and then gradually improved over the next three years. Better outcomes were reported for V100 rectal wall volumes of ≤ 0.5 cc and D10 urethra values of ≤ 210 Gy.

Conclusions

The findings of this study show that dosimetric parameters influence only functional QL outcomes while non-functional outcomes are only marginally influenced.

Integrating mHealth in Oncology: Experience in the Province of Trento

BACKGROUND

The potential benefits of the introduction of electronic and mobile health (mHealth) information technologies, to support the safe delivery of intravenous chemotherapy or oral anticancer therapies, could be exponential in the context of a highly integrated computerized system.

OBJECTIVE

Here we describe a safe therapy mobile (STM) system for the safe delivery of intravenous chemotherapy, and a home monitoring system for monitoring and managing toxicity and improving adherence in patients receiving oral anticancer therapies at home.

METHODS

The STM system is fully integrated with the electronic oncological patient record. After the prescription of chemotherapy, specific barcodes are automatically associated with the patient and each drug, and a bedside barcode reader checks the patient, nurse, infusion bag, and drug sequence in order to trace the entire administration process, which is then entered in the patient's record. The usability and acceptability of the system was investigated by means of a modified questionnaire administered to nurses. The home monitoring system consists of a mobile phone or tablet diary app, which allows patients to record their state of health, the medications taken, their side effects, and a Web dashboard that allows health professionals to check the patient data and monitor toxicity and treatment adherence. A built-in rule-based alarm module notifies health care professionals of critical conditions. Initially developed for chronic patients, the system has been subsequently customized in order to monitor home treatments with capecitabine or sunitinib in cancer patients (Onco-TreC).

RESULTS

The STM system never failed to match the patient/nurse/drug sequence association correctly, and proved to be accurate and reliable in tracing and recording the entire administration process. The questionnaires revealed that the users were generally satisfied and had a positive perception of the system's usefulness and ease of use, and the quality of their working lives. The pilot studies with the home monitoring system with 43 chronic patients have shown that the approach is reliable and useful for clinicians and patients, but it is also necessary to pay attention to the expectations that mHealth solutions may raise in users. The Onco-TreC version has been successfully laboratory tested, and is now ready for validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The STM and Onco-TreC systems are fully integrated with our complex and composite information system, which guarantees privacy, security, interoperability, and real-time communications between patients and health professionals. They need to be validated in order to confirm their positive contribution to the safer administration of anticancer drugs.

Abstract P5-21-06: Clinical outcomes according to pathological complete response (pCR) and proliferation index of residual tumor (RT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in invasive breast cancer (IBC)

BACKGROUND:

IBC is a heterogeneous disease with several subtypes molecularly identified by gene expression profile. Since subtypes defined by immuhistochemistry (IHC) panel are similar although not identical to molecular subtypes, IHC may represent an easier alternative to identify them.

PURPUSE:

To assess the clinical outcomes of pts who received NC for IBC and the differences by IHC-related subtypes.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of the pts treated with NC for stage II-III IBC from 2000 to 2013. For each pt we recorded baseline tumor size, type of NC [which consisted of anthracyclines (A) + taxanes (T) in HER2- and T + trastuzumab (H) ± A in HER2+ pts), type of surgery, pathological response (pCR defined as the absence of invasive cells in the breast and the lymph nodes regardless of DCIS). IHC subtypes were defined according to ER and PgR expression, Ki-67 level, and HER2 status:

Luminal A (LA): ER and PR+, neg HER2 and Ki67&lt; 14% (= 3%)

Luminal B (LB): ER and/or PR+, neg HER2 and Ki67≥14% (=30%)

Luminal HER2 (LHER2): ER and/or PR+, positive HER2 and any Ki67 (=27%)

HER2 positive (HER2+): neg ER and PR, positive HER2 and any Ki67 (=12%)

Triple negative (TN): neg ER and PR, neg HER2 and any Ki67 (13%)

Unknown subtype in 33 cases (15%)

The loco-regional and distant RFS and OS were evaluated according to pCR.

pCR and survival outcomes were also assessed on the basis of both pre- and post- NC Ki67 levels.

RESULTS:

In the consecutive series of 213 pts who received NC median age was 50 yrs (r. 25-75). The NC consisted of an A+T based regimen in HER2 negative (145 pts) and of a T+ H with A (31 pts) or without A (34 pts) in HER2+ disease.

Only 14 did not receive surgery: 10 for distant metastases development and 4 because still on NC. Quadrantectomy was performed in 120 pts (60%). Among all pts, pCR was achieved in 44 pts(22%) with further 4 pts showing a RT ≤1 mm.

Relationship between pCR and subtypes, ki67 and recurrence rate LA (%)LB (%)LHER2 (%)HER2+TN (%)Median Ki67 (%)Recurrence Rate (%)pCR012.542.527.517.5484.5No pCR10042.329.28.814.63731.5p Value    &lt;0.001 =0.001

All but 19 HER2+ pts (84) received H obtaining pCR in 38% of cases regardless chemotherapy type (A-based 35% vs Not A- 38%)

The median follow-up was 45 months (range 1-166 ms).

The 4y-RFS and OS were better in which achieved pCR than those did no (RFS 92 vs to 74%; p=0.0014 and OS 95 vs 78%; p=0.0074).

Median Ki67 in pretreated core biopsy was 40 compared to 27% in post-NC RT. Patients with high (&gt;30%) post-NC Ki67 levels showed significantly higher risk for disease relapse (4 y-RFS 60%; p=0.0019) and death (4y OS 71%; p=0.018) compared with patients with &lt;15% (4y-RFS 93 and OS 88%) or &gt;15-30 Ki67 levels (4y-RFS 83 and OS 82%).

CONCLUSIONS:

According to literature data, pts achieving pCR after NC showed better RFS and OS compared to no pCR pts. The pCR rate was significantly higher in aggressive subtypes (HER2 and TN). In HER2 disease, pCR was achieved by using chemo + H, irrespective of A-addition. Interestingly high pre-NC KI67 levels seem to predict the possibility obtaing pCR, while post-NC Ki67 levels seem to be of prognostic value in pts who do not receive pCR.

Citation Format: Antonella Ferro, Alessia Caldara, Mariachiara Dipasquale, Chiara Trentin, Renza Triolo, Mattia Barbareschi, Daniela Bernardi, Marco Pellegrini, Daniela Cazzolli, Gabriella Berlanda, Fabio Gasperetti, Francesca Maines, Paolina Tuttobene, Orazio Caffo, Enzo Galligioni. Clinical outcomes according to pathological complete response (pCR) and proliferation index of residual tumor (RT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in invasive breast cancer (IBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-06.

Clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of "young" patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who were 60 years and younger

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of younger patients with prostate cancer is unclear, and the very few studies assessing those with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have mainly involved patients treated with older therapies. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a contemporary series of docetaxel-treated patients with mCRPC who were 60 years and younger.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 134 patients who were 60 years and younger who were treated with docetaxel in 25 Italian hospitals and recorded their predocetaxel history of prostate cancer, their characteristics at the start of chemotherapy, and their postdocetaxel treatment history and outcomes.

RESULTS

Most of the 134 consecutive patients with mCRPC received the standard 3-week docetaxel schedule; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months, and 90 patients underwent further therapies after progression. The median overall survival (OS) from the start of docetaxel treatment was 21 months, but OS was significantly prolonged by the postprogression treatments, particularly those based on the new agents such as cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, or enzalutamide. OS was significantly shorter in the patients with a shorter interval between the diagnosis of prostate cancer and the start of docetaxel treatment; those who received hormonal treatment for a shorter period; those with shorter prostate-specific antigen doubling times; and those with lower hemoglobin levels, a worse performance status, and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before starting treatment with docetaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this first study of clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of younger patients with mCRPC showed that their survival is similar to that expected in unselected patients with mCRPC who were of any age.

Activity of new agents (NAs) as third-line treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) showing a primary resistance (PRes) to NAs-based second line therapy after docetaxel (DOC): Preliminary results from a multicenter Italian study

216

Background: The androgen receptor machinery remains the ultimate target of NAs in mCRPC post-DOC, abiraterone acetate (AA), cabazitaxel (CAB), and enzalutamide (ENZ). It is postulated that some mechanisms of resistance may be common to all NAs. This may be crucial in planning their sequential use, mainly when a PRes to one of them is observed. The present study assessed the activity of NAs in pts who previously experienced a PRes to another NA administered after DOC. Methods: We collected data of pts who received sequentially two NAs after DOC in 32 Italian hospital. For each pt we recorded the clinical outcomes of all treatments received after DOC. For the study purpose, we consider with PRes all pts progressing within 3 months after second line NA start. All other pts were considered as without PRes. Results: A consecutive series of 271 mCRPC pts, median age 71 yrs (46-91), with bone (89%), nodal (56%) or visceral (19%) mets, was collected. All pts received NAs as second line after DOC (AA 54% – CAB 34%– ENZ 12%) and 54 (20%) showed a PRes. Among these, third line treatment [AA (31%), CAB (42%), and ENZ (27%)], produced a biochemical and an objective response rate of 11% in both cases, with a median progression free survival (PFS) and a median overall survival (OS) of 4 mos and 8 mos, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of clinical outcomes on the basis of NA sequences (see Table). Conclusions: It appears from this preliminary data, that the activity of NAs in pts showing a PRes to second line NAs is very limited, regardless the NA is administered. [Table: see text]

Gastrointestinal metastases from prostate cancer: a review of the literature

ABSTRACT 

The availability of active new drugs for the treatment of advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer has significantly prolonged overall survival, thus changing the natural history of the disease and raising the likelihood of observing metastases in atypical sites. This review of the literature describes the frequency, clinical-pathological features and presenting symptoms of non-liver gastrointestinal metastases (GIm) from prostate cancer. Its purpose is to increase clinical awareness of the increasing incidence of such GIm, contributing to the early detection, accurate diagnosis and, when feasible, appropriate management.

Clinical Outcomes of Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treatments Administered as Third or Fourth Line Following Failure of Docetaxel and Other Second-line Treatment: Results of an Italian Multicentre Study

BACKGROUND

The availability of new agents (NAs) active in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel treatment (abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel, and enzalutamide) has led to the possibility of using them sequentially to obtain a cumulative survival benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To provide clinical outcome data relating to a large cohort of mCRPC patients who received a third-line NA after the failure of docetaxel and another NA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who had received at least two successive NAs after the failure of docetaxel.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The independent prognostic value of a series of pretreatment covariates on the primary outcome measure of overall survival was assessed using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We assessed 260 patients who received one third-line NA between January 2012 and December 2013, including 38 who received a further NA as fourth-line therapy. The median progression-free and overall survival from the start of third-line therapy was, respectively, 4 mo and 11 mo, with no significant differences between the NAs. Performance status, and haemoglobin and alkaline phosphatase levels were the only independent prognostic factors. The limitations of the study are mainly due its retrospective nature and the small number of patients treated with some of the sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to demonstrate a difference in the clinical outcomes of third-line NAs regardless of previous NA therapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

It is debated which sequence of treatments to adopt after docetaxel. Our data do not support the superiority of any of the three new agents in third-line treatment, regardless of the previously administered new agent.