A modified technique for Gore Excluder limb deployment in difficult iliac anatomy during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Complex iliac anatomy including extreme tortuosity constitutes a relative contraindication for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with additional risk of limb-graft occlusion. The Gore Excluder limb-graft is a flexible stent-graft, which adapts easily to iliac tortuosity. Nevertheless, the presence of the stiff guide wire does not always allow for an ideal apposition of the stent graft to the angulated common iliac artery vessel wall. We describe herein a modified technique for Gore Excluder limb-graft deployment with partial removal of the stiff wire in cases with difficult tortuous or narrow iliac arteries during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Current status of Hemobahn/Viabahn endografts for treatment of popliteal aneurysms

The aim of the present study was to review the literature reporting the use of the Hemobahn/Viabahn endograft (W. L. Gore and Assoc Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA) for endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA). A PubMed database search was performed looking for studies reporting endovascular treatment of PAA with the Hemobahn/Viabahn endograft within the period January 2000-December 2012. All relevant studies were independently assessed and all references were examined for potentially missed relevant reports. Studies were included if they reported experience with five patients or more. Eight studies with 222 patients (mean age 72.4 years, 92.3% male) and 251 PAA (mean diameter 2.9 mm, 14.3% symptomatic) were included. Thirteen cases (5.2%) were treated on an urgent basis, including three cases of ruptured PAA and 10 cases of acute limb ischemia. Initial technical success was 99.2%. The mean number of implanted endografts/PAA was 1.8 (range 1-4). Thirty-day mortality was 1 (0.4%) patient. Perioperative complications occurred in 1.6%, consisting of three access site hematomas and one acute endograft thrombosis. Cumulative mean follow-up duration was 36.9 months. During this period, a total of 46 endograft failures (42 occlusions, 4 stenoses) were observed within a mean postoperative time interval of 10.8 months. Cumulative primary and secondary patency rates were 85.6% and 93.4% at one year, and 78.5% and 90.4% at 2 years, respectively. Limb salvage rate during follow-up was 99.2%. Endoleak was noticed in 15 (6%) cases and endograft migration in 13 (5.2%) cases. Endograft fracture was reported in 14 (5.6%) cases, resulting in occlusion in six patients, and in type III and IV endoleaks in two patients. Secondary intervention during follow-up was required in 47 (18.7%) cases, including 32 reinterventions for endograft occlusion, four for endograft stenosis, and 11 for endoleak repair. Endovascular PAA repair with the Hemobahn/Viabahn endograft is feasible and safe yielding excellent initial technical success rates, minimum perioperative mortality and morbidity, and mid-term patency and limb salvage rates comparable to open surgery. These results suggest that a significant proportion of patients might benefit from endovascular PAA repair.

Early outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair in challenging aortic neck morphology based on experience from the GREAT C3 registry

AIM

The aim of this paper was to evaluate early outcome of the GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA Endoprosthesis featuring C3 Delivery System in subjects with aortic neck anatomy outside IFU.

METHODS

Individual patient data prospectively collected over a 2 year period from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT). For each subject a minimum data set was collected containing demographic, pre/intra- and postoperative variables. Main outcome measures were successful exclusion of the AAA and occurrence of any major endoleak at 1 month. In this study, outside IFU was defined as aortic neck length less than 15 mm and/or aortic neck angle greater than 60 degrees.

RESULTS

A total of 400 subjects, (86.6% male, mean age 73.9 years). Primary pathology was AAA in 94.2% with 98.2% undergoing EVAR as a primary procedure. Sixty-eight subjects underwent EVAR outside IFU (neck length <15 mm N.=32, neck angle >60˙N.=47 and neck length <15 mm and angle >60° N.=11). The graft was successfully deployed within 5 mm of its intended location in 63 (94%) cases utilising a total of 33 repositioning episodes. Eight aortic cuffs were used, 5 to treat a type 1 endoleak. At 30 days we recorded 2 type 2 endoleaks both successfully treated and 1 type 1b also successfully treated. There were 2 deaths, one in each group.

CONCLUSION

GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA Endoprosthesis featuring C3 Delivery System allows re-positioning to be performed safely in cases outside IFU. Repositioning is an effective operative manoeuvre and facilitates EVAR in challenging anatomy. Longer follow-up is required to evaluate the durability of these results at 30 days.

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with chimney and snorkel grafts: indications, techniques and results

The chimney technique in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (Ch-EVAR) involves placement of a stent or stent-graft parallel to the main aortic stent-graft to extend the proximal or distal sealing zone while maintaining side branch patency. Ch-EVAR can facilitate endovascular repair of juxtarenal and aortic arch pathology using available standard aortic stent-grafts, therefore, eliminating the manufacturing delays required for customised fenestrated and branched stent-grafts. Several case series have demonstrated the feasibility of Ch-EVAR both in acute and elective cases with good early results. This review discusses indications, technique, and the current available clinical data on Ch-EVAR.

The role of mandatory lifelong annual surveillance after thoracic endovascular repair

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an attractive and well-accepted option for the management of the various thoracic aortic pathologies that vascular surgeons are confronted with. As in the abdominal aorta, current management trends include the treatment of younger patients with longer life expectancies, raising the issue of postoperative surveillance. There are several relevant differences between these anatomic areas when it comes to surveillance, including the relative inaccessibility of the thoracic aorta to ultrasound interrogation and the increased variability of thoracic aortic pathologies and post-TEVAR complications. In addition, concerns regarding radiation-induced carcinogenesis and contrast-induced nephropathy reduce the enthusiasm of many surgeons for regular computed tomography surveillance. Most agree that surveillance is important after TEVAR, but the method, duration, and frequency of that surveillance is much less clear and is the topic of this debate.

Endovascular strategies for infrarenal aneurysms with short necks

The aim of this paper was to review the current options for endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with short infrarenal neck. Studies reporting endovascular treatment of AAAs with short proximal neck were reviewed. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) is most frequently reported for the treatment of patients with short neck AAA, with high technical success rates (≥ 99%), low operative mortality (≤ 3.5%) and excellent mid- and long-term results in terms of target vessel patency (≥ 97%). Chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR) is far less reported, but also presents with high technical success rates (>97%), varying operative mortality rates (0-12.5%), and excellent short- and mid-term target vessel patency (≥ 96%). Ch-EVAR, however, seems to be associated with high postoperative stroke up to 6.3%, and increased proximal type I endoleak (5-31%). Standard EVAR performed outside manufacturers' instructions for use (IFU) is also documented in the treatment of short proximal neck AAA, but is associated with increased operative mortality and morbidity, type I endoleak, and migration, compared to standard EVAR in AAA with longer proximal neck length. F-EVAR currently represents the most validated and reliable endovascular option for the treatment of short-neck AAA. Ch-EVAR is feasible, but lacks long-term data. Its use seems only favored in acute high surgical risk patients, in elective cases complicated with unintentional renal artery coverage or in anatomies unsuitable for F-EVAR. Standard EVAR in short neck AAA is associated with poorer outcomes and should not be recommended as first choice.

Iliac branched device implantation in tortuous iliac anatomy after previous open ruptured aortic aneurysm repair

The aim of this paper was to present iliac branched device (IBD) implantation in a fit 67-year-old man with tortuous iliac anatomy after previous emergent open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The patient underwent open treatment for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in another hospital. The procedure was complicated by extreme blood loss which prevented concommitant treatment of two large iliac aneurysms. Later, the patient underwent stent-grafting of a right common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA) with coil embolization of the internal iliac artery (IIA). He was then refferred to our institute for treatment of the left CIAA with preservation of the left IIA. An IBD was used to this purpose. The introduction system was inserted over a through-and-through wire, and the bridging stent-graft via a left axillary approach. An Excluder leg was used to mate the IBD with the surgical graft limb. Additional self-expanding stents were needed to keep the limbs of the surgical graft open. One year later the patient is doing well, without buttock claudication, and the aneurysm is well excluded. With challenging anatomy, endovascular repair with an IBD may require additional technical tricks but also back-up materials to achieve success.

Is it time to eliminate CT after EVAR as routine follow-up?

Growing concerns regarding radiation exposure, contrast induced nephropathy and increasing costs lead us to reconsider the necessity of CTA for all EVAR patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of different follow-up imaging modalities with the aim of finding a rationale to the optimal follow-up imaging protocol. We reviewed recent literature regarding post EVAR imaging modalities and compared it to our experience with different follow-up protocols. Modalities compared were CTA, DUS, CEUS, and plain abdominal X-ray with regard to detection of complications, cost, overall impact to the patient, and on decision making regarding reintervention. CTA is related to increased follow-up costs and a much higher exposure to radiation compared to other modalities. The cumulative radiation dose can have a significant impact on the attributable lifetime cancer risk of patients. Renal function deterioration during post EVAR follow-up is higher compared to open repair. Plain abdominal X-ray is the best manageable modality and a well established tool in documenting migration kinking and stent fracture. Plain X-Ray cannot be used as a standalone imaging modality since it doesn't allow direct detection of endoleaks. As far as detection of endoleaks is concerned recent meta-analyses show a sensitivity of 66-77% for DUS and 81-98% for CEUS, respectively. Most endoleaks missed by DUS and CEUS are type II endoleaks with no need for reintervention. Our data in a cohort of 62 patients do show a sensitivity of 66.7% for DUS, and do correlate with current literature. No endoleaks requiring reintervention were missed. A follow-up protocol comprising of DUS/CEUS and plain abdominal X-ray gives a wide range of information covering EVAR related risks and is associated with less radiation exposure, avoidance of renal function deterioration due to repeated contrast agent application and an important decrease in the cost of EVAR follow-up. CTA should be reserved for cases of inconclusive ultrasound, signs of complications and unfavourable anatomy.

Effectiveness of treatment for octogenarians with acute abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether advanced age may be a reason to refrain from treatment in patients with an acute abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAAA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that took place in a tertiary care university hospital with a 45-bed intensive care unit. Two hundred seventy-one patients with manifest AAAA, admitted and treated between January 2000 and February 2008, were included. Six patients died during operation and were included in the final analysis to ensure an intention-to-treat protocol, resulting in 234 men and 37 women with a mean age of 72 ± 7.8 years (range, 54-88 years). Forty-six patients (17%) were 80 years or older. Interventions involved open or endovascular AAAA repair.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 33 ± 30.4 months (including early deaths). Mean hospital length of stay was 16.9 ± 20 days for patients younger than 80 and 13 ± 16.7 days for patients older than 80 years of age. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significantly better survival for the younger patients (P < .05). Stratification based on urgency or type of treatment did not change the difference. Two-year actuarial survival was 70% for patients younger than 80 and 52% for those older than 80. At 5-year follow-up, these figures were 62% and 29%, respectively. Mean survival in patients older than 80 was 39.8 ± 6.8 months versus 64.5 ± 3.0 months in those younger than 80.

CONCLUSIONS

For octogenarians, our liberal strategy of treating patients with AAAA was associated with satisfactory short- and long-term outcome, with no difference with regard to disease- or procedure-related morbidity between the younger and older group. Assuming an integrated system for managing AAAA is in place, advanced age is not a reason to deny patients surgery.

Fenestrated stent-grafting after previous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

AIM

The aim of this study was to present their experience and highlight the technical difficulties associated with the use of fenestrated stent-grafts to treat juxta and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in patients having undergone a previous infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A prospectively held database maintained at the University Medical Center of Groningen including 162 patients who have undergone branched and fenestrated stent-grafting for AAA, was queried for patients treated with this technology after previous EVAR. Indication for repair, comorbidity precluding open repair, technical challenges associated with the repair, as well as operative mortality and morbidity were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients underwent repair with a fenestrated endograft after previous EVAR. All patients had aneurysmal degeneration of the juxta- and pararenal aorta not suitable to standard endovascular techniques. We encountered various intraoperative complications including iliac and renal artery access problems, intraoperative previous graft migration, and dislocation of previous graft limb. In one patient, immediate conversion was needed because a twisted graft limb prevented retrieval of the top cap of the fenestrated graft. The remaining eight patients were successfully treated by endovascular means. For these patients, target vessel success rate was 100% (20/20) and mean hospital stay 6.0 days (range 3-12 days). Thirty-day and one-year mortality were 0%. Mean follow up was 31 months (range 1-76 months). No aneurysm related death occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Fenestrated endovascular stent-grafts can be used to repair juxta- and pararenal AAA after previous EVAR. However, several technical challenges have to be overcome due to the presence of a previous stent-graft.

Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

For patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms, randomized trials have shown an initial overall survival benefit for elective endovascular repair over conventional open repair. This survival difference, however, was no longer significant in the second year after the procedure. Information regarding the comparative outcome more than 2 years after surgery is important for clinical decision making.

METHODS

We conducted a long-term, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing open repair with endovascular repair in 351 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm of at least 5 cm in diameter who were considered suitable candidates for both techniques. The primary outcomes were rates of death from any cause and reintervention. Survival was calculated with the use of Kaplan-Meier methods on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

We randomly assigned 178 patients to undergo open repair and 173 to undergo endovascular repair. Six years after randomization, the cumulative survival rates were 69.9% for open repair and 68.9% for endovascular repair (difference, 1.0 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.8 to 10.8; P=0.97). The cumulative rates of freedom from secondary interventions were 81.9% for open repair and 70.4% for endovascular repair (difference, 11.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.0 to 21.0; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Six years after randomization, endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm resulted in similar rates of survival. The rate of secondary interventions was significantly higher for endovascular repair. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00421330.)

Thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm branched repair

Open thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a demanding procedure with high impact on the patient and the operating team. Results from expert centres show mortality rates between 3-21%, with extensive morbidity including renal failure and paraplegia. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms initially required an undilated portion of the aorta below the renal arteries to safely fixate the stent-graft. More complex abdominal artic aneurysms (i.e., short-necked, juxta- and suprarenal aneurysms) were later successfully treated with fenestrated grafts. The development of branched grafts opened the way to treat thoraco-abdominal aneurysms endovascularly. In this review, a comprehensive overview of technical aspects and results of the available literature is given. Mortality rates are below 10%, with spinal cord ischemia reported between 2.7% and 20%. Target vessel branch patency invariably has been reported between 95% and 100%, with first mid-term results demonstrating evidence for durability. Most series included high-risk patients, who were denied open repair. Nevertheless, risks associated with endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aneurysm should be acknowledged. Technique-specific complications including perforation of small vessels due to multiple catheterization resulting in retroperitoneal hematoma, and compartment syndrome of the lower limbs should be mentioned. Technical evolution of branched grafts is ongoing. Tapering down the main graft to allow for room for the branches has resulted in easier catheterization of target vessels and insertion of bridging stent-grafts. For the same reason, the branches for celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery are deliberately off-set in position. To stabilise the usually long devices, additional spiral wires have been added, to facilitate deployment in the correct orientation. Endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aneurysms will continue to evolve and gradually take over from open repair, in view of the much lower physical impact on the patient.

The intracranial aneurysm susceptibility genes HSPG2 and CSPG2 are not associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

A genetic variant on chromosome 9p21 associates with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and intracranial aneurysm (IA), indicating that despite the differences in pathology there are shared genetic risk factors. We investigated whether the IA susceptibility genes heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2 (HSPG2) and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 2 (CSPG2) associate with AAA as well.

METHODS

Using tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), all common variants were analyzed in a Dutch AAA case-control population in a 2-stage genotyping approach. In stage 1, 12 tag SNPs in HSPG2 and 22 tag SNPs in CSPG2 were genotyped in 376 patients and 648 controls. Genotyping of significantly associated SNPs was replicated in a second independent cohort of 360 cases and 376 controls.

RESULTS

In stage 1, no HSPG2 SNPs and 1 CSPG2 SNP associated with AAA (rs2652106, P = .019). Association of this SNP was not replicated (P = .342).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that, in contrast to IA, HSPG2 and CSPG2 do not associate with AAA.

Results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with selective use of the Gore Excluder

AIM

To evaluate single center results with selective use of the Gore Excluder stent-graft for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospective data base. Primary endpoints were technical success, all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality and aneurysm rupture. Secondary endpoints were late complications including migration, endoleak, aneurysm growth, limb occlusion, and re-intervention.

RESULTS

The Gore Excluder stent-graft was used in 92 elective cases, mainly in cases with difficult iliac anatomy. There were 81 (88%) male patients. Mean age was 70.4+/-7.5 (range, 53-87). Primary assisted technical success rate was 98.9% (91/92 patients). Thirty-day mortality was 0%. Median follow-up was 35.7 months (range, 2-99). Overall survival was 95.2+/-2.4% at 1 year, 89.2+/-3.7% at 2 years, 83.9+/-4.5% at 3 years and 70.2+/-6.8% at 5 years. During follow-up there were 3 (3.3%) Type I endoleaks and 20 (21.7%) Type II endoleaks. Proximal migration of more than 5 mm without endoleak occurred in two patients. In total 13 re-interventions were performed in 12 (13%) patients. No graft limb occlusion occurred. No aneurysm ruptured during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective use of the Gore Excluder demonstrates excellent short- and long-term results. Despite being used in challenging iliac anatomy no graft limbs occluded.

The role of branched endografts in preserving internal iliac arteries

AIM

The aim of this study was to report our treatment algorithm and early results with the use of an iliac branched device (IBD) to preserve the internal iliac artery (IIA) in the treatment of aortoiliac and solitary common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms.

METHODS

From September 2004 on, all patients with aorto-iliac aneurysms with a suitable proximal neck or CIA aneurysms were evaluated. Selection for treatment with an IBD was done based on activity level of the patient and anatomical criteria of the aneurysm. Absolute exclusion criteria included aneurysmal IIA, severe atherosclerosis of the IIA, and small residual CIA lumen. Patients who were at risk of losing one out of two patent IIA were only considered for IBD if they were physically active. Follow-up was performed with computed tomography scanning at six weeks and one year, and thereafter yearly.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (39 aorto-iliac, 20 CIA) were evaluated for treatment with an IBD. Seven patients were not considered for IBD for low activity level. Twenty-five patients were not suitable because of adverse anatomy. In total, 27 patients (20 aorto-iliac, 7 CIA) were treated with 30 IBDs. Technical success was achieved in 96.3% of patients. There was no 30-day mortality. Mean follow-up period was 16+/-14 months. In three patients the IIA side branch occluded, resulting in buttock claudication in only one patient. No external iliac artery occlusion or device component disconnection was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

An IBD provides a totally endovascular option to preserve the IIA in selected aortoiliac and isolated CIA aneurysms. Anatomical application rate for the use of an IBD was 52.5% in our series. Further studies are needed to determine the indications for use of this device.

External-to-internal iliac artery endografting for the exclusion of iliac artery aneurysms: an alternative technique for preservation of pelvic flow?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe an alternative endovascular procedure to exclude iliac artery aneurysms, preserving perfusion to the internal iliac artery.

CASES

Two patients, considered unfit for open repair, underwent endovascular repair of iliac artery aneurysms. One of these occurred after previous placement of a bifurcated prosthesis. In both cases the aneurysms were excluded using a nitinol stent covered with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene from the external to the internal iliac artery. Using this technique, the internal iliac arteries were perfused in a retrograde manner. Both interventions were technically successful. The external-to-internal endograft remained patent after 6 and 16 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular placement of a stent-graft from the external iliac artery into the internal iliac artery may offer an alternative and minimal invasive alternative for the management of common and internal iliac artery aneurysms. With the use of this technique, pelvic perfusion is preserved. Further studies are warranted to appraise the advantages and risk of this approach for iliac artery aneurysms.