Does Medicaid cover artificial urinary sphincter and male urethral sling surgery?-a state-by-state analysis

Background

Information regarding the Medicaid coverage of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male suburethral slings (MS) placement in the United States (US) is not readily available. In this manuscript, we seek to elucidate the state-by-state Medicaid coverage of these two procedures in the US.

Methods

State Medicaid websites were utilized to access publicly available physician fee schedules for the calendar year 2020. Fee schedules were searched for current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. CPT codes representing insertion of tandem cuff, insertion of AUS, removal of AUS, removal and replacement AUS, sling operation for correction of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and removal or revision of sling for male SUI were utilized. Data were recorded by the procedure for each device, including the coverage status and physician fees.

Results

Of the 50 US states analyzed, 49 publish publicly accessible physician fee schedules. All 49 of these states reported coverage for removal with and without revision of the AUS, and 48 states reported coverage for insertion of an AUS, and insertion of a tandem cuff. The median reimbursement for each AUS related procedure was $624.00 ($181.84-$10,960.90) for tandem cuff, $665.54 ($199.89-$11,949.86) for AUS insertion, $528.03 ($146.90-$1,893.12) for AUS removal, and $630.29 ($208.55-$11,586.74) for AUS revision. All 49 states reported coverage for placement of MS, and 48 states reported coverage for removal or revision of MS. The median reimbursement was $652.57 ($198.00-$5,237.35) for MS placement and $554.47 ($104.27-$2,288.93) for MS revision.

Conclusions

AUS and MS procedures in the Medicaid population are covered by nearly all states. Therefore, surgical treatment of SUI may be offered to Medicaid patients in most states without reimbursement concerns.

Oral testosterone therapy: past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) remains a commonly utilized treatment for men with testosterone deficiency (TD). Despite the recent FDA approval of new oral TRT medications, concerns remain regarding their efficacy and safety, and prescription rates for these medications have decreased compared to those for TD medications with other routes of administration.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral testosterone undecanoate (oTU), a new oral TRT medication.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases; 1269 articles were identified, with 44 articles included in the final review and 12 used to perform meta-analyses to investigate the change in serum total testosterone (TT) and risk of adverse effects following oral testosterone undecanoate (oTU) use. Articles were also reviewed to investigate the reported effects of oTU on body composition, liver function, hematologic assays, lipid profiles, hormone assays, prostate growth, hypertension, and symptoms of TD.

RESULTS

Across placebo-controlled randomized trials, there was no significant increase in TT for those receiving oTU vs placebo (mean difference, -0.26 [95% CI, -1.26 to 0.73]). On subanalysis, when eugonadal participants received oTU, a significant decrease in TT was demonstrated (mean difference -0.86 [95% CI, -1.28 to 0.43]). When participants who were hypogonadal at baseline received oTU, a significant increase in TT compared to placebo was seen (mean difference 1.25 [95% CI, 0.22-2.29]). There was no significant risk of adverse effects (RR, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.08 to 0.03]) or serious adverse effects (RR, 0.15 [95% CI, -0.66 to 0.96]) in the oTU groups compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

oTU was found to be well tolerated in hypogonadal patients, resulting in improved testosterone levels, height velocity, and sexual symptoms, without significant hepatotoxicity, prostatic enlargement, or worsening hypertension. There was no consensus regarding the effect of oTU on lean and fat mass percentages, hematologic assays, lipid profiles, mood, and general well-being.

Partial Component Exchange of a Non-Infected Inflatable Penile Prosthesis is Associated With a Higher Complication Rate

OBJECTIVE

To describe the infectious and non-infectious complications in men undergoing Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) revision with partial and complete component exchange for mechanical malfunction.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IPP revision. Men undergoing procedures for implant infection were excluded. Patients were divided into those who had complete exchange of the entire device or partial exchange of only one or 2 components. Infectious and non-infectious complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-eight men had complete exchange of the entire device and 85 had partial component exchange. Men undergoing partial exchange had a significantly higher infection rate (7.1% vs 2.2%, P = .031). The partial exchange group also was more likely to receive antifungals (51.8 vs 16.6%, P < .001), have a modified salvage washout (77.4 vs 60.2%, P = .004), and less likely to receive vancomycin and gentamicin (63.5 vs 83.7%, P < .001). Time to revision was significantly shorter in the partial exchange group (44.9 vs 168.2 months, P < .001). Mean follow-up was slightly longer in the complete exchange group (18.3 vs 13.0 months). In multivariable analysis, partial exchange surgery, vancomycin and gentamicin prophylaxis, modified salvage washout, and antifungal prophylaxis were no longer associated with postoperative infections. The partial exchange group had greater rates of non-infectious complications (21.2% vs 9.5%, P = .005) such as pump malfunction and tubing breakage.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing partial component revision had more infectious and non-infectious complications. These findings suggest that partial component exchange increases complications in men undergoing IPP revision.

Update on Treatment Options for Stuttering Priapism

Purpose of Review

There is a paucity of peer-reviewed evidence to guide medical management of stuttering priapism. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current understanding regarding the pathophysiology of priapism and management options for stuttering priapism.

Recent Findings

Conducting large-scale, randomized, placebo-controlled trials that elucidate the optimal treatment of stuttering priapism is challenging. Therefore, recent treatment guidelines are based upon small case series, retrospective studies, and expert opinions. Nonetheless, multiple compounds from various drug classes have shown promise in treating stuttering priapism, and a few pharmacotherapies such as Crizanlizumab are currently under active investigation.

Summary

Stuttering priapism is an under-investigated disorder with a complex pathophysiology. Currently, there is no wildly adopted universal therapeutic strategy. Further research is warranted to identify the appropriate treatment of stuttering priapism and to determine the long-term side effects of current pharmacotherapies.

Synchronous Surgical Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reoperation Rates

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy, safety, and postoperative outcomes of synchronous surgery for concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the available synchronous surgical approaches for concomitant ED and SUI and to assess the reoperation rates compared to asynchronous surgery and surgery only for ED or SUI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until June 2022 for relevant studies. Based on data availability, we performed a meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) comparing reoperation rates after synchronous surgery in patients with concomitant ED and SUI versus asynchronous surgery, as well as surgery solely for ED or SUI (PROSPERO: CRD42022326941).

RESULTS

We included 18 studies in the systematic review (16,517 patients) and 5 in the meta-analysis. Comparing synchronous implantation of penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) versus asynchronous surgery, no statistically significant differences were observed in the reoperation rates [OR:0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-1.84, I²:0%). Comparing synchronous implantation of both penile prosthesis and AUS versus implantation of only a penile prosthesis or an AUS, combined surgery was associated with higher reoperation rates (OR:2.02, 95%CI: 1.29-3.16, I²:36% and OR:1.7, 95%CI: 1.25-2.32, I²:0%, respectively). Synchronous surgery led to high satisfaction rates and significant improvement in ED and SUI. Evidence for the combination of penile prosthesis with a male sling or the ProACT device is low, but data suggests it may be safe and effective. The synchronous placement of a Mini-Jupette sling and penile prosthesis represents a promising treatment modality for the correction of ED and mild SUI and/or climacturia.

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous penile prosthesis and AUS implantation appears safe and effective in patients with severe ED and SUI. Further high-quality studies are mandatory to strengthen the current scarce evidence for synchronous surgery in patients with ED and SUI. Pyrgidis N, Barham DW, Hammad M, et al. Synchronous Surgical Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reoperation Rates. Sex Med Rev 2022;XX:XXX-XXX.

Hypogonadism associated with higher rate of penile prosthesis infection: An Analysis of United States claims data

OBJECTIVE

To understand the relationship between hypogonadism and penile prosthesis infection risk.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using IBM MarketScan™ Commercial Claims and Encounters database. We identified men with ED diagnosis who underwent penile prosthesis placement from 1/1/2008 to 12/31/2017. Comorbidities and risk factors were identified along with a diagnosis of hypogonadism. After placement of penile prosthesis, men were followed until date of surgery of penile prosthesis explant due to infection. Cox proportional hazards models from time of penile prosthesis surgery to date of infection adjusting for various known confounding factors were run.

RESULTS

We identified 16,660 men who had received penile prosthesis during the study period. 4,832 (29.0%) men had a hypogonadism diagnosis at the time of their initial surgery date. There were 421 (2.5%) device infections requiring explanation. Descriptively, a higher percentage of infections were noted for removal and replacement surgeries compared to primary implants. Hypogonadism was independently associated with a 25.8% higher risk of penile prosthesis infection (HR: 1.258, 95% CI: 1.024-1.546). Among those men who received testosterone therapy for hypogonadism (prescription data within 0-30 days and within 0-90 days of their initial implant surgery), the effect of hypogonadism on infection risk was no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Untreated hypogonadism was associated with a 26% higher risk of penile prosthesis infection. This association was most pronounced in men undergoing removal and replacement surgery, which likely drives this association. This suggests a possible benefit to testosterone therapy in testosterone deficient men prior to penile implant, specifically in men undergoing revision.

Pharmacotherapy in Peyronie's disease: a state-of-the-art review on established contemporary and emerging drugs

INTRODUCTION

Current clinical guidelines on Peyronie's disease (PD) advocate non-surgical treatment options as the first-line therapy despite inconsistent clinical outcomes when compared to definitive penile reconstructive surgery.

AREAS COVERED

This article examines the current understanding of established contemporary and emerging pharmacotherapies for PD. Emphasis has been placed on published clinical studies on drugs in the last 10 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Published studies have shown that combination therapy is likely more effective than monotherapy. Combined treatment modalities involving various oral and/or intralesional pharmacotherapies together with mechanical devices or clinical psychosexual therapy may provide additional or synergistic benefits for PD patients. A multidisciplinary approach coupled with more novel targets for pharmacological intervention could deliver a more effective treatment paradigm to prevent or at least delay the need for definitive penile reconstructive surgery. Drugs targeting the inhibition of TGF-β1 pathway and myofibroblast transformation are of great interest and studies into next-generation genetic sequencing and transcriptional biomarker regulatory pathways in PD will provide useful insights into the pathophysiology of PD, and assist the development of future regenerative technology including cellular-based therapies to target various anti-fibrotic molecular mechanisms and the potential to be integrated into existing treatment armamentarium for PD.

Evidence for the integration of total and free testosterone levels in the management of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively assess total and calculated free testosterone levels in a consecutive group of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and any potential impact on disease aggressiveness and recurrence outcomes.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

The study included a single-centre prospective cohort of 882 patients presenting for radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2018. Data on total testosterone (TT), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and calculated free testosterone (cFT) were prospectively collected. Stepwise logistic regression models were used to assess correlations of TT and cFT with pathological Gleason Grade Group (GGG), extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and biochemical recurrence (BCR).

RESULTS

Total testosterone remained nearly constant across decades (40s-80s): 0.09 decrease/year (R = 0.02), while SHBG increased 0.87/year (R = 0.32) and cFT decreased 0.08/year (R = -0.02). Low cFT of <5.5 independently predicted: very-high-risk GGG (odds ratio [OR] 0.435, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.846-0.994; P = 0.036), EPE (OR 0.557, 95% CI 0.810-0.987; P = 0.011), SVI (OR 0.396, 95% CI 0.798-1.038; P = 0.059), and BCR within 1 year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (OR 0.638, 95% CI 0.971-3.512, P = 0.046). TT was not a predictor.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to popular belief, testosterone remained stable in men aged 40-80 years, whereas free testosterone decreased by 2-3%/year. Low cFT was an independent predictor of very-high-risk PCa and BCR.

Canadian Urological Association guideline: Erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) impacts the wellness and quality of life of millions of Canadians. An evaluation focused on the identification of reversible and irreversible underlying factors is recommended for patients presenting with ED. Through a shared decision-making model framework, the goal of ED treatment is to improve functional outcomes and enhance sexual satisfaction while minimizing adverse effects associated with treatment. Given that ED is assessed and treated by multiple different types of health practitioners, the purpose of this guideline is to provide the best available evidence to facilitate care delivery through a Canadian lens. After a narrative review of ED assessment and treatment for general readership, five key clinical questions relating to priority areas of ED are assessed using the GRADE and evidence-to-decision-making frameworks.

Peyronie's disease - outcomes of collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection: A systematic review

Objective

To review recent literature pertaining to collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCh)and other intralesional (IL) therapies for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease (PD). 

Methods

A systematic search of literature was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed.‘Peyronie’s Disease Clostridium Histolyticum’, ‘Peyronie’s Disease Intralesional’, ‘Peyronie’sDisease Causes’, and ‘Atypical Peyronie’s Disease’ were used as query entries. Inclusion criteriarequired English text from 1980 onwards and have a full text available. Records were reviewed for study power, accuracy, and relevance to our research topic. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria.

Results

Recent literature supports the notion that CCh is the most effective IL treatment forpatients with typical and atypical PD. The capstone CCh study was the IMPRESS trial thatshowed a 34% reduction in curvature with a mean (SD) – 17.0 (14.8)° reduction with IL CCh,while men in the placebo saw an average 18.2% decrease in penile bend with a mean (SD) – 9.3 (13.6)° per person (P < 0.001). A shortened protocol for IL CCh treatment offered a 31.4%reduction in curvature, while decreasing cost and office visits, potentially increasing patientcompliance. Lastly, literature shows CCh is used most in atypical cases, with ~64.8% of patients being treated with CCh, probably because of the high efficacy and safetyprofile that it offers. Serious complications associated with CCh include urethralinjury, corporal rupture, and penile fracture.

Conclusion

Since the approval of CCh by the United States Food and Drug Administration in2013, it has been a staple in the treatment of PD, and here we report the continuedsuperiority of this therapy. CCh is an effective, minimally invasive option in most PDpopulations; however, recent changes have made CCh unavailable for commercial use outside the United States, impacting many patients who have previously benefited.

Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI)

BACKGROUND

No validated English language patient-reported outcome (PRO) currently exists that assesses satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Satisfaction data have been largely based primarily on surgeon assessment of patients or using questionnaires that have not been designed for this purpose.

AIM

To develop an English-language validated PRO that assesses patient satisfaction after IPP surgery.

METHODS

Initially, a literature review and discussions with experts defined domains important to IPP satisfaction (pain, appearance, function, overall satisfaction). The initial 35-item Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) was developed. Cognitive interviews were then performed with IPP patients (n = 12) to gain feedback on the SSIPI domains and items. These data were used to modify SSIPI with the addition of 2 questions for a final item number of 37. Patients from 4 centers, who were between 6 months and 5 years after IPP, were administered the questionnaire through RedCap. Reliability statistics and content analysis were used to winnow questions to yield the final 16-item version of the SSIPI. Internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation. Test-retest reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients using baseline and 2-week data. For convergent validity, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire were used. For discriminant validity, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the SSIPI.

OUTCOMES

Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and confirmatory factor analysis were assessed.

RESULTS

118 men were surveyed. Mean age was 66.8 ± 9.5 years. The 16-item SSIPI showed high internal consistency with an overall Cronbach's Alpha of 0.97 (domains 0.85-0.89). Item-total correlations for individual items to subscales ranged from 0.60 to 0.91. The overall test-retest reliability was 0.94 (domains 0.87-0.93). Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and Self-Esteem and Relationship had correlations of 0.84 overall (domains 0.57-0.79) and 0.47 overall (domains 0.34-0.44), respectively. International Prostate Symptom Score (discriminant validity) had correlations of -0.29 overall (domains -0.17 to -0.31).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

SSIPI is the first English-language validated IPP satisfaction PRO. This will enable clinicians to collect satisfaction data in a standardized way.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

As strengths we have used a rigorous psychometric process and have no industry sponsorship. Limitations include small numbers of specific subpopulations.

CONCLUSION

The SSIPI has demonstrated robust psychometric properties. Salter CA, Bach PV, Jenkins L, et al. Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI). J Sex Med 2021;18:1641-1651.

Does Medicaid Cover Penile Prosthesis Surgery? A State-by-State Analysis

BACKGROUND

Malleable [MPP] and inflatable [IPP] penile prosthesis surgery for the management of erectile dysfunction is a reliable treatment option with high success rates and excellent patient satisfaction; however, Medicaid coverage transparency is poor leaving a knowledge gap in this population.

AIM

The present study seeks to assess Medicaid coverage for MPP and IPP by state as evidenced by inclusion in publicly available physician fee schedules.

METHODS

State Medicaid websites were utilized to access public physician fee schedules. Individual search queries were performed for CPT codes 54400 and 54405 which represent insertion of MPP and IPP, respectively. Data were recorded for each device, including the coverage status, physician fees, and the presence of clear documentation of a prior authorization requirement.

OUTCOMES

Medicaid physician fee schedules were accessible for 49 out of 50 US states, and 28 states reported coverage for at least one type of penile prosthesis.

RESULTS

Two states reported coverage for MPP only, one state reported coverage for IPP only, and 24 states reported coverage for both devices. One state reported that it did not cover either device, but listed coverage for a self-contained IPP (CPT 54401) only. Mean physician reimbursement was $477.15 (290.82-$1175.50) for MPP placement and $691.76 (421.68-$1794.27) for IPP. Eleven states documented prior authorization requirements within their fee schedules, while the remaining 17 states did not. Criteria for approval for prior authorization were not clearly stated in any fee schedule.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Efforts to clearly document approval criteria and educate Men's Health providers on available coverage could result in a significant improvement in sexual satisfaction in the Medicaid population.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Graphical representation of states offering Medicaid penile prosthetic coverage and physician reimbursement ranges are provided with comparison to Medicare rates. Limitations include heterogeneity in fee schedules, lack of prior authorization requirement details, inability to correlate to successful claims data, and the evolving nature of Medicaid coverage for the given procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid coverage exists for penile prosthetic surgery in 28 states, although often with significant, non-transparent prior authorization criteria. Barnard JT, Grimaud L, Yafi FA. Does Medicaid Cover Penile Prosthesis Surgery? A State-by-State Analysis. J Sex Med 2021;18:1455-1460.

Post-market safety and efficacy profile of subcutaneous testosterone enanthate-autoinjector: a cohort analysis

A subcutaneous testosterone enanthate-autoinjector (SCTE-AI) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patient-administered weekly testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). From January 2019 to October 2019, 110 hypogonadal men were treated with SCTE-AI at two institutions. Patients were assessed in a pretherapy visit prior to receiving SCTE-AI and re-assessed 6 weeks after treatment initiation. Patients with a history of prostate cancer were excluded. Trough serum total testosterone (TT), estradiol (E2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and hematocrit (HCT) levels were collected at clinic visits. Therapeutic phlebotomy was recommended for HCT > 54%, and treatment was discontinued for significant increases in PSA as well as for significant treatment-related adverse events. Values from each visit were compared with univariate analysis. 110 patients completed the 6 weeks of observation with a mean age of 40.3 (SD: 10.5). TT significantly rose from 246.6 ng/dL (SD:113.3) pretherapy to 538.4 ng/dL (SD: 209.3) at 6 weeks (p < 0.001). Post-therapy, 101/110 (91.8%) of patients had TT > 300 ng/dL. No patients had HCT > 54%. 74 patients (70.5%) had PSA increase with only 3 (2.9%) experiencing an increase >1.0 ng/dL. There was a significant increase in mean PSA from 1.07 ng/dL (SD: 0.8) pretherapy to 1.18 ng/dL (SD: 0.9) at 6 weeks (p = 0.01). One patient had immediate treatment cessation following diagnosis of prostate cancer. This is the largest non-industry sponsored safety and efficacy profile of SCTE-AI application in urology clinics. After 6 weeks of observation, TT levels increased significantly without any reports of adverse events. SCTE-AI is a safe and effective alternative delivery system of TRT.

Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation

BACKGROUND

Peyronie's disease (PD) is a challenging clinical entity. To assist clinicians with diagnosis and management, four separate organizations have published PD guidelines over the past five years, but there remains a lack of consensus and data-driven recommendations for many aspects of diagnosis and treatment.

AIM

To compare and contrast PD guidelines, highlighting key similarities and differences among the guideline panel recommendations and identify areas for further research.

METHODS

We performed an extensive review to compare and contrast diagnosis and treatment recommendations from publically available published PD guidelines from four different organizations: American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, Canadian Urologic Association, and the International Society of Sexual Medicine.

OUTCOMES

Key similarities and differences with regards to definition, evaluation, nonsurgical and surgical treatments were compared.

RESULTS

Points of general consensus among the guideline panels included: History is adequate for diagnosis of PD, and intracavernosal injection is a gold standard to evaluate penile deformity prior to invasive intervention. Careful counseling with shared decision-making is required prior to treatment. In general, plication and incision and/or grafting surgery is reserved for patients with preserved erectile function whereas penile prosthesis implantation is the only surgical option for PD patients with erectile dysfunction. Overall, nonsurgical treatments have inferior evidence of efficacy with these being the main area of controversy; however, all societies recognize that intralesional injections may be used. 0Further research into the pathophysiology of PD may direct novel treatments targeted towards early intervention and rigorous outcomes research may direct best practices for the surgical treatment of PD in the future.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

PD is a challenging clinical entity. Direct comparison of the published PD guidelines highlights clear standards of care as well as areas where more research is needed to promote higher levels of evidence-based practice.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

To our knowledge this is the first report to directly compare and contrast published guidelines pertaining to the diagnosis and management of PD. Limitations include the lack of evidence-quality review pertaining to individual guideline recommendations, although this was not the aim of this review.

CONCLUSION

We highlight consensus of major urologic societies on many aspects of work up and management of PD with notable exceptions which may guide further research. Manka MG, White LA, Yafi FA, et al. Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation. J Sex Med 2021;18:363-375.

Hypogonadism and its treatment among prostate cancer survivors

Adult-onset hypogonadism (AOH) is associated with sexual dysfunction, poor bone mineralization, decreased muscle mass, metabolic syndrome disorder, and cognitive suppression. Historically, testosterone has been contraindicated in men with a history of prostate cancer. However, there has been a modern resurgence in re-evaluating this belief. Not only can testosterone be safely utilized to alleviate AOH symptoms in prostate cancer survivors, it has been also touted as a treatment option for aggressive prostatic cancer. While much work remains in understanding the relationship between testosterone and prostate cancer, those who survive this disease should not be automatically turned away from an opportunity to be treated and restored.

Review of Sexual Preservation After Novel Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgical Treatment Modalities From Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Traditional benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment options, such as transurethral resection of the prostate and laser, have focused on addressing urinary symptoms for men; however, these options are associated with a high risk of sexual dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess newer technologies (Aquablation therapy, UroLift, and Rezum) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the impact of preserving sexual function compared with transurethral resection of the prostate.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of Food and Drug Administration randomized studies from each of the technologies was carried out. A comparison of 3-year outcomes for International Index of Erectile Function-5 and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Function domain short form was analyzed.

RESULTS

Aquablation and prostatic urethral lift were the only therapies to show permanent sexual function preservation in both Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Function domain short form (ejaculatory function) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (erectile function) at 3 years after treatment.

CONCLUSION

For prostates less than 80 cc, Aquablation and prostatic urethral lift were able to demonstrate permanent sexual function preservation in both Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Function domain short form (ejaculatory function) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (erectile function) at 3 years after treatment. Bhojani N, Yafi FA, Misrai V, et al. Review of Sexual Preservation After Novel Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgical Treatment Modalities From Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trials. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:169-173.