Effect of 4DryField® PH on blood loss in hip bipolar hemiarthroplasty following intracapsular femoral neck fracture - a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

One of the most common complications of hip arthroplasty is excessive blood loss that could necessitate allogenic blood transfusion, which is further associated with other complications, such as infections, transfusion reactions or immunomodulation. In gynecology, 4DryField®PH, an absorbable polysaccharide-based formulation, is used for hemostasis and adhesion prophylaxis. In this study, we evaluated its hemostatic effect in patients undergoing hip bipolar hemiarthroplasty following intracapsular femoral neck fracture.

METHODS

We studied 40 patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures (Garden III or IV) admitted at our institution between July 2016 and November 2017. We included patients above 60 years with simple fracture and without pathologic fractures. Patients were randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group received 5 g of 4DryField® PH (subfascially and subcutaneously) during wound closure. Three drainages were inserted in a standardized manner (submuscular, subfascial, and subcutaneous) and drainage volume was measured immediately before extraction. Total blood loss was calculated using Mercuriali's formula and standard hemograms upon admission and five days after surgery. Volume of postoperative hematoma was measured using point-of-care ultrasound seven days after surgery.

RESULTS

Volume of the postoperative hematoma was reduced by 43.0 mL. However, significant reduction of total blood loss and drainage volume was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that 4DryField® PH had a local hemostatic effect, thereby reducing volume of the postoperative hematoma. However, this reduction was small and had no effect on the total blood loss. Further studies are warranted to improve the application algorithm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS, DRKS00017452 , Registered 11 June 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

[AKTIN - The German Emergency Department Data Registry - real-time data from emergency medicine : Implementation and first results from 15 emergency departments with focus on Federal Joint Committee's guidelines on acuity assessment]

Hintergrund

Die Notfallversorgung befindet sich im Umbruch. In Notaufnahmen werden Patienten ausgehend von Symptomen und Dringlichkeit versorgt; dies bildet sich jedoch in den etablierten Routinedaten der gesetzlichen Sozialversicherung nicht ab. Ziel des AKTIN-Projekts war der Aufbau einer datenschutzkonformen Registerinfrastruktur zur Nutzung von klinischen Routinedaten aus Notaufnahmen.

Methoden

Über eine standardisierte Schnittstelle werden aus den verschiedenen Dokumentationssystemen kontinuierlich Daten der Notaufnahmebehandlung in ein lokales Data Warehouse exportiert. Dort stehen sie sowohl für lokale Nutzungen, wie interne Berichte und Qualitätsmanagement, als auch gleichzeitig datenschutzkonform für multizentrische Auswertungen zur Verfügung.

Anhand der Registerpopulation wird die Ersteinschätzung sowie die Erhebung von Vitalparametern in Abhängigkeit von Vorstellungsgründen für einen 12-Monats-Zeitraum analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Für den Zeitraum 04/2018 bis 03/2019 wurden 436.149 gültige Fälle aus 15 Notaufnahmen übermittelt. In 86,0 % der Fälle ist eine Ersteinschätzung dokumentiert.

Diese fand in 70,5 % innerhalb von 10 min nach Ankunft des Patienten statt. In 10 Kliniken wird regelhaft (82,3 %) ein Vorstellungsgrund erfasst. Die Erfassung von Vitalparametern variiert plausibel zwischen den Vorstellungsgründen.

Schlussfolgerung

Das AKTIN-Notaufnahmeregister bietet einen zeitnahen Einblick in das Versorgungsgeschehen der Notaufnahmen ohne zusätzlichen Dokumentationsaufwand und unabhängig vom primären IT-System, Kostenträger, Fallart und Abrechnungsmodus. Die Vorgaben des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zur Ersteinschätzung werden weitgehend umgesetzt. Durch die Etablierung von standardisierten Vorstellungsgründen werden symptombasierte Analysen und Gesundheitssurveillance ermöglicht.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Onlineversion dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00063-020-00764-2) enthält die Abb. S1 und S2. Beitrag und Zusatzmaterial stehen Ihnen auf www.springermedizin.de zur Verfügung. Bitte geben Sie dort den Beitragstitel in die Suche ein, das Zusatzmaterial finden Sie beim Beitrag unter „Ergänzende Inhalte“.

Evaluation of outcome relevance of quality indicators in the emergency department (ENQuIRE): study protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Quality of emergency department (ED) care affects patient outcomes substantially. Quality indicators (QIs) for ED care are a major challenge due to the heterogeneity of patient populations, health care structures and processes in Germany. Although a number of quality measures are already in use, there is a paucity of data on the importance of these QIs on medium-term and long-term outcomes. The evaluation of outcome relevance of quality indicators in the emergency department study (ENQuIRE) aims to identify and investigate the relevance of QIs in the ED on patient outcomes in a 12-month follow-up.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is a prospective non-interventional multicentre cohort study conducted in 15 EDs throughout Germany. Included are all patients in 2019, who were ≥18 years of age, insured at the Techniker Krankenkasse (statutory health insurance (SHI)) and gave their written informed consent to the study.The primary objective of the study is to assess the effect of selected quality measures on patient outcome. The data collected for this purpose comprise medical records from the ED treatment, discharge (claims) data from hospitalised patients, a patient questionnaire to be answered 6-8 weeks after emergency admission, and outcome measures in a 12-month follow-up obtained as claims data from the SHI.Descriptive and analytical statistics will be applied to provide summaries about the characteristics of QIs and associations between quality measures and patient outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval of the leading ethics committee at the Medical Faculty of the University of Magdeburg (reference number 163/18 from 19 November 2018) has been obtained and adapted by responsible local ethics committees.The findings of this work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts and presentations as conference contributions (abstracts, poster or oral presentations).Moreover, results will be discussed with clinical experts and medical associations before being proposed for implementation into the quality management of EDs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00015203); Pre-results.

[Restructuring of inpatient emergency treatment : What will change?]

The resolution on the restructuring of inpatient emergency treatment was passed by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) on 19 April 2018 based on the Hospital Structure Act and became binding with the publication in the Bundesanzeiger on 18 May 2018. The resolution describes the future structural and qualitative prerequisites for participation of hospitals in the provision of emergency treatment in three levels: basic emergency treatment, extended emergency treatment and comprehensive emergency treatment. Furthermore, a level of nonparticipation is also planned. In addition, there are special modules, e.g. for the treatment of children and auxiliary modules for specifically equipped hospitals with highly specialized patient treatment (e.g. stroke unit). A transition regulation period of 3-5 years provides hospitals with the possibility to adjust to the new minimum requirements. The German Hospital Federation (DKG) and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds (GKV-SV) will negotiate the assessment of surcharges and deductions subsequent to the resolution.

[Even low-acuity patients prefer hospital-based emergency care : A survey of non-urgent patients in an emergency department with unique regional position]

BACKGROUND

Besides increasing numbers of cases in German emergency departments (ED), the spectrum of attending patients is also changing. Patients with acute illnesses tend to prefer EDs to ambulatory care as primary contact point. This study examines the motives for use and use behavior of low-urgent ED-patients.

METHODS

Anonymous patient survey in the ED of Wolfsburg Hospital between 12/2015 and 03/2016 with descriptive analysis. All patients with low urgency (Manchester-Triage-System (MTS), levels blue and green) were eligible.

RESULTS

81.5% of respondents (729 evaluable out of 7000 questionnaires distributed) attended the ED between 8:00 a. m. and 5:00 p. m., 70.1 % of them were walk-in patients. The motive most frequently cited was that they would receive better care in the ED (48.3 %). Contrary to acuity assessment, 67.8 % of respondents considered themselves a medium to life-threatening emergency. As alternative option, 49.2 % would choose a nearby clinic in the region for their complaints.

CONCLUSION

Self-assessed urgency differs with acuity assessment according to MTS. Patients who fear an acute threat to their health do not use services provided in the ambulatory sector such as the emergency practice of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in the immediate proximity sufficiently. Previous approaches for patient navigation do not seem to be successful in this setting. Strengthening of EDs as a single 24/7 access point for emergency care with simultaneous abolition of parallel care structures should be discussed.

[Magdeburg Medical School - Logbook for Surgical Training of Final Year Medical Students - an Interdisciplinary, Medical School-Specific Concept Based on the Guidelines Issued by the Medical School Association ("Medizinischer Fakultätentag") in 2012]

BACKGROUND

The final year is the last part of the study of human medicine and can be regarded as an essential period, during which medical knowledge should be consequently converted into medical expertise. Since the amendment of the medical license policy ("Ärztliche Approbationsordnung" [ÄApprO]) from July 17, 2012, in particular, since April 01, 2013, German universities have been obliged to provide a training schedule such as a "logbook" for this final year, specifically for the mandatory time periods within surgery and internal medicine. In preparation for this innovation, the German Medical School Association ("Medizinischer Fakultätentag") presented basic logbooks as consensus documents in June 2012. The portfolio for each surgery discipline and the Magdeburg Medical School, had been developed on the basis of individual initiatives and used for years, and was revised, specified and further developed into a "logbook of the medical study's final year" - specific for daily practice and the Magdeburg Medical School, and to the guidelines of the Medical School Association ("Medizinischer Fakultätentag"). The aim of the present commentary is i) to present the Magdeburg Medical School logbook and its clinical planning for cases, diagnoses and (surgical) interventions, as a summary of institutional experience and ii) to describe the mandatory surgical part of the "Magdeburg's final year of the study of human medicine".

METHOD

Narrative short overview including individual teaching experiences and topic-related references from "PubMed" using terms for literature search such as "surgical logbook", "practical year" and "medical teaching". The background and aims of the document's modifications are explained for each surgical discipline.

RESULTS

The "Logbook" is subdivided into 6 chapters: introduction, basics, statement of requirement, selected surgical diseases and interventions as well as information on final year-associated events and courses and instructions for creating the obligatory case report.

CONCLUSION

The presented "Magdeburg Medical School Final Year Logbook of the Surgical Disciplines" has been created according to the requirements of the German Medical School Association ("Medizinischer Fakultätentag") and has been simultaneously adapted to the conditions and established medical teaching at the presenting Medical School. In particular, the medical students are given a document related to daily clinical practice, which allows them, within an overall teaching concept, to acquire indispensable expertise.

Surgical treatment of lateral and posterior process fractures of the talus: Mid-term results of 15 cases after 7 years

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively evaluated the mid-term results of surgery for talar process fractures (lateral and posterior processes) and exploratively analyzed parameters that potentially impact treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Fifteen patients who underwent internal fixation (January 2000 to December 2015) were examined for radiological and clinical functional outcomes. The independent parameters evaluated were age, sex, extent of general injury, soft-tissue damage, surgical latency, and fracture type.

RESULTS

All fractures healed completely. Three patients developed osteoarthritis. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle/Hindfoot Scale score was 79.5±18.6, the Functional Foot Index score was 31.1±31.4, and the physical and mental component summary scores of the Short Form 36, version 2, were 46.6±11.8 and 50.3±9.1, respectively. No influence on the above scores was determined.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes of internal fixation of talar process fractures were good. Delayed surgical treatment (≥14days) did not significantly lead to poorer outcomes in our patients.

[National Learning Objectives Catalogue in Surgery - General Part Defining Competences of Medical School Graduates in Surgery]

Competency-based medical education is needed in order to meet the requirements of medical care currently and in the future. The basis of this are activity-based learning objectives that are merged in competency-based catalogues. A basis for a core curriculum of undergraduate medical training is the National Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM). Already in 2013, for surgery, the competencies which medical students should have achieved after completing the practical year (PJ) in relation to surgical diseases were defined in the special part of the National Catalogue of Learning Objectives in Surgery (NKLC). In the now amended general part of the NKLC, interdisciplinary competencies were defined and consented from all surgical disciplines, that are relevant for all surgical disciplines and that all representatives from the different surgical disciplines should incorporate in their surgical training. The complete NKLC is now available for faculties, teachers and students for trial (available online: https://www.dgch.de/index.php?id=190&L=528). The guiding principle for the entire development process was to make sure that students gain all competencies they need when starting to work as a medical doctor and therefor to increase patient safety.

Existence and role of standard operating procedures in the emergency department : A national online survey

BACKGROUND

In recent years, increases in the number of patients in emergency departments (ED) have led to continuous work intensification. To handle this problem, the treatment effectiveness has to be maximized. One strategy that may help to optimize workflow is the use of standard operating procedures (SOPs). We investigated the existence of SOPs and subjective effects on treatment in German EDs.

METHODS

We performed an online survey from February 2015 until June 2016. We collected data regarding the existence of SOPs, health care level, medical field, work experience, and education. All professional groups participating in the treatment of patients were requested to take part in the survey.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent of the 589 participants in the survey confirmed the existence of SOPs in their EDs. SOPs were more frequently available in hospitals with higher health care levels. Participants working in EDs without SOPs felt less confident regarding treatment of patients. More than 85% of these participants were in favor of having SOPs. The absence of SOPs was associated with a subjective delay in patient treatment.

CONCLUSION

Most of the EDs had available SOPs. In departments without SOPs, most physicians wanted them to be implemented. SOPs seemed adequate in terms of supporting workflow and satisfaction with patients' treatment.

[Routine Data from Emergency Departments: Varying Documentation Standards, Billing Modalities and Data Custodians at an Identical Unit of Care]

Hintergrund Nicht nur im Kontext der Neuordnung der Notfallversorgung in Deutschland besteht derzeit ein hoher Bedarf an Daten aus Notaufnahmen. Für die Versorgungsforschung bieten sich Daten an, welche auf gesetzlicher Grundlage generiert werden. Unterschiedliche Kostenträger und Abrechnungsmodi stellen eigene Anforderungen an die Dokumentation dieser Routinedaten.

Methodische Herausforderungen Aufgrund der sektoralen Trennung gibt es keinen Datensatz oder Datenhalter, der Auskunft über alle Notaufnahmebehandlungen geben kann. Aus administrativer Sicht gilt die gesamte Notaufnahmebehandlung als ambulant oder stationär, tatsächlich wird die Entscheidung darüber erst während der Versorgung getroffen. Für die stationäre Versorgung existiert ein administratives Notfallkennzeichen, allerdings kein direktes Merkmal für Notaufnahmebehandlungen. Bei Abrechnung ambulanter Fälle über die kassenärztlichen Vereinigungen ist mindestens eine Diagnose (ICD-10-Kode) zu erfassen, versehen mit einem Kennzeichen zur Diagnosesicherheit. Es können mehrere ICD-10-Kodes ohne Hierarchie angegeben werden. Bei stationär behandelten Patienten ist eine Aufnahmediagnose und nach Behandlungsende die Hauptdiagnose und ggf. Nebendiagose(n) an die zuständige Krankenkasse zu übermitteln. Die gesetzliche Unfallversicherung hat eigene Dokumentationsanforderungen.

Lösungsansätze Je nach Forschungsfrage und Studiendesign sind unterschiedliche Vorgehensweisen erforderlich. Stammen die Daten unmittelbar aus Notaufnahmen bzw. Kliniken ist eine Information über den Kostenträger und den Abrechnungsmodus hilfreich. Bei Nutzung von Krankenkassendaten muss die Identifikation von stationär behandelten Patienten in einer Notaufnahme aktuell indirekt erfolgen. Dazu können unter anderem die Parameter Aufnahmegrund und definierte „eindeutige“ Notfall-Diagnosen herangezogen werden. Die fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik hat eigene Limitationen, enthält dafür aber die stationären Fälle aller Kostenträger.

Diskussion Die divergierenden Anforderungen an die administrative Dokumentation verursachen einen hohen Aufwand in den Kliniken. Perspektivisch ist eine Vereinheitlichung der Leistungserfassung und Dokumentation von Notfallbehandlungen aller Kostenarten auch zur Generierung von validen, vergleichbaren und repräsentativen Daten für die Versorgungsforschung erstrebenswert. Die Einführung eines eigenen Fachabteilungsschlüssels würde zur Identifikation von Notaufnahmebehandlungen beitragen.

[Prehospital application of tourniquets for life-threatening extremity hemorrhage : Systematic review of literature]

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of a tourniquet in the case of life-threatening hemorrhages of the extremities is well recognized and led to the recommendations on "Tourniquet" of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (DGAI) in 2016. The aim of this systematic review was to re-evaluate the current medical literature in relation to the published DGAI recommendations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on the analysis of all studies published from January 2015 until January 2018 in the PubMed databases, the publicized recommendations for action on "Tourniquet" of the DGAI were critically re-evaluated. For this purpose, 17 questions on 6 subjects were formulated in advance. The systematic review followed the PRISMA recommendations and is registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews, Reg.-ID: CRD42018091528).

RESULTS

Of the 284 studies identified with the keywords tourniquet and trauma in the period from January 2015 to January 2018 in PubMed, 50 original papers discussing the prehospital application of tourniquet for life-threatening hemorrhage of the extremities were included. The overall level of evidence is low. No article addressed any of the formulated questions with a prospective randomized interventional study. Scientific deductions could be found only in an indirect way in a descriptive manner.

CONCLUSION

The 50 original articles included in this qualitative, systematic review revealed that the recommendations "Tourniquet" of the DGAI published in 2016 are mostly still up to date despite an inhomogeneous study situation. A deviation occurred in the conversion of a tourniquet but due to the short prehospital treatment time in the civilian setting this is of little importance; however, in the future a strict distinction should be made between tourniquets which were placed for tactical reasons and those placed as a medical necessity.

Implementation of Emergency Department Performance Benchmarking Using R and LaTeX

The German Emergency Department Data Registry (GEDD-registry, AKTIN) provides an infrastructure for collecting and querying up-to-date medical records in a distributed manner. Within this framework, a benchmark report on cross-institutional comparison using the program R is prepared using routine data of participating hospitals. Currently, 16 emergency departments (EDs) routinely transfer data of 1,200 to approximately 5,000 patients per month to a federated GEDD-registry datawarehouse. Using various packages in the R environment, hospitals receive a monthly visual report on their data among all participating hospitals. Graphical representations are implemented using column diagrams and box plots. Reports currently contain 25 tables and 40 graphs. Benchmark reports are created in R-Studio and exported using Portable Document Format, PDF. Quarterly expert meetings with the heads of participating EDs are currently performed for further improvements. Preparation of external benchmarking reports with R enables a detailed data presentation for participating hospitals and ED managers.

The way from pen and paper to electronic documentation in a German emergency department

Background

Some of the advantages of implementing electronic emergency department information systems (EDIS) are improvements in data availability and simplification of statistical evaluations of emergency department (ED) treatments. However, for multi-center evaluations, standardized documentation is necessary. The AKTIN project (“National Emergency Department Register: Improvement of Health Services Research in Acute Medicine in Germany”) has used the “German Emergency Department Medical Record” (GEDMR) published by the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive and Emergency Care as the documentation standard for its national data registry.

Methods

Until March 2016 the documentation standard in ED was the pen-and-paper version of the GEDMR. In April 2016 we implemented the GEDMR in a timeline-based EDIS. Related to this, we compared the availability of structured treatment information of traumatological patients between pen-and-paper-based and electronic documentation, with special focus on the treatment time.

Results

All 796 data fields of the 6 modules (basic data, severe trauma, patient surveillance, anesthesia, council, neurology) were adapted for use with the existing EDIS configuration by a physician working regularly in the ED. Electronic implementation increased availability of structured anamnesis and treatment information. However, treatment time was increased in electronic documentation both immediately (2:12 ± 0:04 h; n = 2907) and 6 months after implementation (2:18 ± 0:03 h; n = 4778) compared to the pen-and-paper group (1:43 ± 0:02 h; n = 2523; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We successfully implemented standardized documentation in an EDIS. The availability of structured treatment information was improved, but treatment time was also increased. Thus, further work is necessary to improve input time.

Competitive advantage gained from the use of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) for trauma patients: Evaluation of 1724 patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to analyze helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) in comparison to EMS, in respect to patient's mortality and morbidity.

DESIGN

From a cohort of traumatized patients (n = 1724) prospectively enrolled in the German trauma registry (DGU-R) at Frankfurt University Hospital from 2009 to 2013, 1646 could be analyzed for in-hospital mortality and short-term outcome (GOS) at discharge and compared between HEMS and EMS.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

129 patients (7.8%) died in the hospital. Unadjusted mortality was significantly lower in the HEMS group compared to EMS (p = 0.001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis after adjustment of variables including reanimation and age as the strongest predictors, in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced in HEMS (p = 0.014, OR = 0.21). Further predictors in the multiple logistic regression analysis were GCS > = 8 (p = 0.001), RRsys (p < 0.001), ISS at Head/Neck > = 3 (p = 0.003), and total ISS > = 9 (p < 0.001). Total rescue time and on scene time were associated with mortality (p < 0.001) but not included in the multiple logistic regression model. Without adjustment, short-term outcome (GOS) was significantly improved (p = 0.014). In a linear model, after adjusting for multiple variables including age, ISS Head/Neck > = 3, ISS Extremities > = 3, GCS > = 8, and RRsys as the strongest predictors (p < 0.001), the association remained significant (p = 0.043). Further predictors in the multiple linear regression analysis were total ISS > = 9 (p = 0.002), ISS abdomen (p = 0.001), and ISS Chest (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant improvement for in-hospital survival for HEMS could be demonstrated. Especially in Germany, with a high number of secondary call outs (about 44%) after EMS has already reached the traumatized patient, HEMS must be the first choice for severely injured trauma patients. Dispatch criteria for immediate alarm of HEMS are recommended under practical considerations.

Effects and Consequences of Being an OSCE Examiner in Surgery-A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE

Even though objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a well-investigated format for competency-based practical examination, only a few studies have explored the motivations of OSCE examiners and their opinions, both positive and negative, toward being an examiner. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the views of OSCE examiners using semi-structured interviews.

DESIGN

Surgical OSCE examiners were queried at two medical faculties in Germany via semi-structured interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the techniques of structured qualitative content analysis.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the medical faculties of the Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany and of the Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

All of the study participants were surgeons working at the university hospital of one of the faculties.

RESULTS

A total of 29 examiners were queried until a saturation of content was achieved. A critical reflection of one's own teaching was described as a major benefit by most participants. Furthermore, they noted that the standards and competences examined during the OSCE boosted the detail of their teaching sessions in the wards. However, the examiners criticized missed operations due the examination and were not appreciated by superiors for being an examiner. Most of the examiners (22/29) preferred to be an examiner themselves rather than appointing student peer examiners. If they had appointed someone else, that would mean they would miss valuable experiences useful for their own teaching.

CONCLUSIONS

Being an OSCE examiner confers several advantages, notably the reflection of one's own teaching, which was described as highly valuable by the examiners.

[Patient Motivation to Participate in Medical Education]

BACKGROUND

Student education focuses increasingly on case-related teaching. Often the consent of the patient to participate in student education is supposed to be provided. In most instances this is taken for granted - which it is not. Here, we investigated the motivation of the patients to participate in student education and influence factors using an anonymised survey.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The survey was performed from 2017/01/01 until 2017/04/30 and recruited inpatients of a university department of trauma surgery. The questionnaire contained 10 multiple choice questions targeting socio-demographic factors and the motivation of the patients to participate in different aspects of medical education. This was captured using a 5-point Likert scale. The electronic analysis of the questionnaire was performed with the program KLAUS (Blubbsoft GmbH, Berlin, Germany) after digitalizing the data.

RESULTS

In total 162 questionnaires were analysed. The patients were generally highly motivated to participate in bedside teaching and a student examination as well as consenting to the collection of pictures, videos and X-ray images or subsequent contact. Patient satisfaction was a principle factor. There was a positive correlation between the satisfaction with the motivation to participate in bedside teaching and a student examination as well as giving consent to the collection of pictures, videos and X-ray images or subsequent contact. There was significantly decreased motivation for participation in a lecture. In comparison, male patients had greater motivation to participate in a lecture. Moreover 40- to 49-year-old patients were significantly less motivated to participate in a lecture than 20- to 29-year-old and 50- to 59-year-old patients. Patient satisfaction had no influence on motivation to participate in a lecture.

CONCLUSION

The motivation of the patients to participate in bedside teaching and a student examination as well as giving consent to the collection of pictures, videos and X-ray images or subsequent contact correlated with patient satisfaction. Socio-demographic factors are less important. Patient motivation to participate in a lecture is lower regardless of patient satisfaction.

Train-the-Trainer: Professionalisierung der Lehre im klinischen Alltag – Selbsteinschätzung Lehrender zur didaktischen Kompetenz und den Rahmenbedingungen des Unterrichts

Hintergrund Didaktiktrainings tragen zur Verbesserung der Qualität der medizinischen Lehre bei. In einem Kurs des Train-the-Trainer-Konzepts (TTT-Konzepts) der Chirurgischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Lehre (CAL) wurden dabei Lehrende (TN) verschiedener Professionen und Karrierestufen gemeinsam unterrichtet.

Ziel der Arbeit Einschätzungen zur eigenen Lehrtätigkeit im klinischen Alltag durch verschiedene Gruppen, wie assistenzärztliches (AÄ), oberärztliches Personal (OÄ) und Pflegende (KP), deren Wahrnehmung von Erschwernissen und Artikulation von Wünschen zur Lehrverbesserung.

Material und Methoden Vor Kursbeginn wurden biografische Daten, didaktische Vorerfahrungen, Lehrhindernisse sowie Wünsche zur Lehrverbesserung erfragt. Nach Abschluss wurden die TN gebeten, den Kurs zu bewerten. Die Antworten zu den geschlossenen und offenen Fragen wurden quantitativ und qualitativ ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse Von 2014 bis 2017 wurden 6 Basiskurse (TTT-A) an 3 Standorten durchgeführt. 97 TN nahmen an den Befragungen teil (AÄ n = 44, OÄ n = 19, KP n = 17). Mehr als ⅔ verfügten bereits über didaktische Vorkenntnisse. Zwischen ärztlichen und pflegerischen Berufsgruppen fanden sich hierbei keine signifikanten Unterschiede. Während AÄ und KP primär am Krankenbett unterrichteten, lehrten OÄ überwiegend im Rahmen von Vorlesungen, Wahlfächern und Seminaren. Für die Lehre im klinischen Alltag fühlte sich nur ein geringer Anteil aus allen Berufsgruppen gut vorbereitet. Als Haupterschwernisse wurden Zeit- und Personalmangel, eine zu hohe Anzahl von Studierenden und zu geringe eigene didaktische Vorkenntnisse angegeben. Fast ⅔ der AÄ empfanden die studentische Lehre als starke oder moderate Belastung, gegenüber ca. 50% der OÄ und 60% KP. Als Wünsche zur Lehrverbesserung wurden differenziertere Vorgaben zu Inhalt und Aufbau der Lehrveranstaltungen, eine höhere Wertschätzung der Lehre insgesamt sowie die regelmäßige didaktische Qualifizierung der Lehrenden genannt.

Diskussion Berufsgruppenbedingte Unterschiede im klinischen Alltag und individueller Karrierefortschritt üben einen Einfluss auf Art, Umsetzung und Wahrnehmung der Lehrtätigkeit aus. Durch Fokussierung auf Lernziele und wesentliche für den Unterricht am Krankenbett relevante Lehr- und Prüfungsformate können Dozententrainingsprogramme berufsgruppenübergreifend zum Wissens- und Kompetenzzuwachs beitragen. Hinweise auf einen nachhaltigen Effekt ermutigen zur Fortsetzung und Weiterentwicklung des TTT-Konzepts.

[Requirements for a sustainable standardization and digitalization in clinical emergency and acute medicine]

Digitalization and standardization of documentation in medicine are increasingly progressing. In the decision of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) for a staged system of emergency structures in hospitals and in the report of the expert committee for development in the healthcare system on needs-oriented guidance of healthcare, the actuality of the topic is underlined with concrete naming of future tasks. The section on emergency admission protocols of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive and Emergency Care Medicine (DIVI) has been working for years on this topic and has repeatedly reported on the progress of the topic in clinical emergency care. Standardization and digitalization represent the foundation for health services research spread across locations as well as the possibility for benchmarking. Digitalization makes the secondary use of primary clinical routine data possible. Digitalization decreases redundancies of data transmission by avoiding manual data input in, for example registers.

Evaluation of new quality indicators for the TraumaRegister DGU® using the systematic QUALIFY methodology

BACKGROUND

The TraumaRegister DGU^® (TR-DGU) of the German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie, DGU) enables the participating hospitals to perform quality management. For that purpose, nine so-called audit filters have existed, since its foundation, which, inter alia, is listed in the Annual Report. The objective of this study effort is a revision of these quality indicators with the aim of developing pertinent new and reliable quality indicators for the management of severely injured patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Apart from indicators already used at national and international levels, a systematic review of the literature revealed further potential key figures for quality of the management of severely injured patients. The latter were evaluated by an interdisciplinary and interprofessional group of experts using a standardized QUALIFY process to assess their suitability as a quality indicator.

RESULTS

By means of the review of the literature, 39 potential indicators could be identified. 9 and 14 indicators, respectively, were identified in existing trauma registries (TR-DGU and TARN), 17 in the ATLS^® training concept, and 57 in the S3 guideline on the treatment of polytrauma/severe injuries. The exclusion of duplicates and the limitation to indicators that can be collected using the TR-DGU Version 2015 data set resulted in a total of 43 indicators to be reviewed. For each of the 43 indicators, 13 quality criteria were assessed. A consensus was achieved in 305 out of 559 individual assessments. With 13 quality criteria assessed and 43 indicators correspond this to a relative consensus value of 54.6%. None of the indicators achieved a consensus in all 13 quality criteria assessed. The following 13 indicators achieved a consensus in at least 9 quality criteria: time between hospital admission and WBCT, mortality, administration of tranexamic acid to bleeding patients, use of CCT with GCS <14, time until first emergency surgical intervention (7-item list in the TR-DGU), time until surgical intervention for penetrating trauma, application of pelvic sling belt (prehospital), capnometry (etCO₂) in intubated patients, time until CCT with GCS < 15, time until surgery for hemorrhagic shock, time until craniotomy for severe TBI, prehospital airway management in unconscious patients (GCS < 9), and complete basic diagnostics available. Two indicators achieved a consensus in 11 criteria and thus represent the maximum consensus achieved within the group of experts. Four indicators only achieved a consensus in three quality criteria. 17 indicators had a mean value for the 3 relevance criteria of ≥ 3.5 and were, therefore, assessed by the group of experts as being highly relevant.

CONCLUSION

Not all the key figures published for the management of severely injured patients are suitable for use as quality indicators. It remains to be seen whether the quality indicators identified by experts using the QUALIFY process will meet the requirements in practice. Prior to the implementation of the assessed quality indicators in standardized quality assurance programs, a scientific evaluation based on national data will be required.