26
|
Rumi G, Canonica GW, Foster JM, Chavannes NH, Valenti G, Contiguglia R, Rapsomaniki E, Kocks JWH, De Brasi D, Braido F. Correction: Digital Coaching Using Smart Inhaler Technology to Improve Asthma Management in Patients With Asthma in Italy: Community-Based Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10:e44532. [PMID: 36427351 PMCID: PMC9736753 DOI: 10.2196/44532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/25879.].
Collapse
|
27
|
Sousa‐Pinto B, Schünemann HJ, Sá‐Sousa A, Vieira RJ, Amaral R, Anto JM, Klimek L, Czarlewski W, Mullol J, Pfaar O, Bedbrook A, Brussino L, Kvedariene V, Larenas‐Linnemann DE, Okamoto Y, Ventura MT, Agache I, Ansotegui IJ, Bergmann KC, Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Carreiro‐Martins P, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chivato T, Chu DK, Cingi C, Costa EM, Cruz AA, Del Giacco S, Devillier P, Eklund P, Fokkens WJ, Gemicioglu B, Haahtela T, Ivancevich JC, Ispayeva Z, Jutel M, Kuna P, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Kraxner H, Laune D, Lipworth B, Louis R, Makris M, Monti R, Morais‐Almeida M, Mösges R, Niedoszytko M, Papadopoulos NG, Patella V, Pham‐Thi N, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sheikh A, Sova M, Todo‐Bom A, Taborda‐Barata L, Toppila‐Salmi S, Sastre J, Tsiligianni I, Valiulis A, Vandenplas O, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J. Consistent trajectories of rhinitis control and treatment in 16,177 weeks: The
MASK
‐air® longitudinal study. Allergy 2022; 78:968-983. [PMID: 36325824 DOI: 10.1111/all.15574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data from mHealth apps can provide valuable information on rhinitis control and treatment patterns. However, in MASK-air®, these data have only been analyzed cross-sectionally, without considering the changes of symptoms over time. We analyzed data from MASK-air® longitudinally, clustering weeks according to reported rhinitis symptoms. METHODS We analyzed MASK-air® data, assessing the weeks for which patients had answered a rhinitis daily questionnaire on all 7 days. We firstly used k-means clustering algorithms for longitudinal data to define clusters of weeks according to the trajectories of reported daily rhinitis symptoms. Clustering was applied separately for weeks when medication was reported or not. We compared obtained clusters on symptoms and rhinitis medication patterns. We then used the latent class mixture model to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS We analyzed 113,239 days (16,177 complete weeks) from 2590 patients (mean age ± SD = 39.1 ± 13.7 years). The first clustering algorithm identified ten clusters among weeks with medication use: seven with low variability in rhinitis control during the week and three with highly-variable control. Clusters with poorly-controlled rhinitis displayed a higher frequency of rhinitis co-medication, a more frequent change of medication schemes and more pronounced seasonal patterns. Six clusters were identified in weeks when no rhinitis medication was used, displaying similar control patterns. The second clustering method provided similar results. Moreover, patients displayed consistent levels of rhinitis control, reporting several weeks with similar levels of control. CONCLUSIONS We identified 16 patterns of weekly rhinitis control. Co-medication and medication change schemes were common in uncontrolled weeks, reinforcing the hypothesis that patients treat themselves according to their symptoms.
Collapse
|
28
|
Rumi G, Canonica GW, Foster JM, Chavannes NH, Valenti G, Contiguglia R, Rapsomaniki E, Kocks JWH, De Brasi D, Braido F. Digital Coaching Using Smart Inhaler Technology to Improve Asthma Management in Patients With Asthma in Italy: Community-Based Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10:e25879. [PMID: 36322120 PMCID: PMC9669888 DOI: 10.2196/25879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reliance on short-acting β-2 agonists and nonadherence to maintenance medication are associated with poor clinical outcomes in asthma. Digital health solutions could support optimal medication use and therefore disease control in patients with asthma; however, their use in community settings has not been determined. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study is to investigate community implementation of the Turbu+ program designed to support asthma self-management, including adherence to budesonide and formoterol (Symbicort) Turbuhaler, a combination inhaler for both maintenance therapy or maintenance and reliever therapy. The secondary objective is to provide health care professionals with insights into how patients were using their medication in real life. METHODS Patients with physician-diagnosed asthma were prescribed budesonide and formoterol as maintenance therapy, at a dose of either 1 inhalation twice daily (1-BID) or 2 inhalations twice daily (2-BID), or as maintenance and reliever therapy (1-BID and reliever or 2-BID and reliever in a single inhaler), and they received training on Turbu+ in secondary care centers across Italy. An electronic device attached to the patients' inhaler for ≥90 days (data cutoff) securely uploaded medication use data to a smartphone app and provided reminders, visualized medication use, and motivational nudge messages. Average medication adherence was defined as the proportion of daily maintenance inhalations taken as prescribed (number of recorded maintenance actuations per day or maintenance inhalations prescribed per day) averaged over the monitoring period. The proportion of adherent days was defined as the proportion of days when all prescribed maintenance inhalations were taken on a given day. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the proportion of adherent days between patients in the maintenance regimen and patients in the maintenance and reliever regimen of a given dose. RESULTS In 661 patients, the mean (SD) number of days monitored was 217.2 (SD 109.0) days. The average medication adherence (maintenance doses taken/doses prescribed) was 70.2% (108,040/153,820) overall and was similar across the groups (1-BID: 6332/9520, 66.5%; 1‑BID and reliever: 43,578/61,360, 71.0%; 2-BID: 10,088/14,960, 67.4%; 2-BID and reliever: 48,042/67,980, 70.7%). The proportion of adherent days (prescribed maintenance doses/doses taken in a given day) was 56.6% (31,812/56,175) overall and was higher with maintenance and reliever therapy (1-BID and reliever vs 1-BID: 18,413/30,680, 60.0% vs 2510/4760, 52.7%; P<.001; 2-BID and reliever vs 2-BID: 8995/16,995, 52.9% vs 1894/3740, 50.6%; P=.02). Rates of discontinuation from the Turbu+ program were significantly lower with maintenance and reliever therapy compared with maintenance therapy alone (P=.01). CONCLUSIONS Overall, the high medication adherence observed during the study might be attributed to the electronic monitoring and feedback mechanism provided by the Turbu+ program.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bousquet J, Toumi M, Sousa-Pinto B, Anto JM, Bedbrook A, Czarlewski W, Valiulis A, Ansotegui IJ, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Brussino L, Canonica GW, Cecchi L, Cherrez-Ojeda I, Chivato T, Costa EM, Cruz AA, Del Giacco S, Fonseca JA, Gemicioglu B, Haahtela T, Ivancevich JC, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Klimek L, Kvedariene V, Kuna P, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Lipworth B, Morais-Almeida M, Mullol J, Papadopoulos NG, Patella V, Pham-Thi N, Regateiro FS, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sheikh A, Taborda-Barata L, Ventura MT, Yorgancioglu A, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T. The Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Approach of Value-Added Medicines: As-Needed Treatment in Allergic Rhinitis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:2878-2888. [PMID: 35934308 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Drug repurposing is a major field of value-added medicine. It involves investigating and evaluating existing drugs for new therapeutic purposes that address unmet healthcare needs. Several unmet needs in allergic rhinitis could be improved by drug repurposing. This could be game-changing for disease management. Current medications for allergic rhinitis are centered on continuous long-term treatment, and medication registration is based on randomized controlled trials carried out for a minimum of 14 days with adherence of 70% or greater. A new way of treating allergic rhinitis is to propose as-needed treatment depending on symptoms, rather than classical continuous treatment. This rostrum will discuss existing clinical trials on as-needed treatment for allergic rhinitis and real-world data obtained by the mobile health app MASK-air, which focuses on digitally-enabled, patient-centered care pathways.
Collapse
|
30
|
Vieira RJ, Pham-Thi N, Anto JM, Czarlewski W, Sá-Sousa A, Amaral R, Bedbrook A, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Brussino L, Canonica GW, Cecchi L, Cruz AA, Fokkens WJ, Gemicioglu B, Haahtela T, Ivancevich JC, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linnemann D, Morais-Almeida M, Mullol J, Niedoszytko M, Okamoto Y, Papadopoulos NG, Patella V, Pfaar O, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sheikh A, Taborda-Barata L, Toppila-Salmi S, Sastre J, Tsiligianni I, Valiulis A, Ventura MT, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J, Sousa-Pinto B. Academic Productivity of Young People With Allergic Rhinitis: A MASK-air Study. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:3008-3017.e4. [PMID: 35998876 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have suggested an impact of allergic rhinitis on academic productivity. However, large studies with real-world data (RWD) are not available. OBJECTIVE To use RWD to assess the impact of allergic rhinitis on academic performance (measured through a visual analog scale [VAS] education and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire plus Classroom Impairment Questions: Allergy Specific [WPAI+CIQ:AS] questionnaire), and to identify factors associated with the impact of allergic rhinitis on academic performance. METHODS We assessed data from the MASK-air mHealth app of users aged 13 to 29 years with allergic rhinitis. We assessed the correlation between variables measuring the impact of allergies on academic performance (VAS education, WPAI+CIQ:AS impact of allergy symptoms on academic performance, and WPAI+CIQ:AS percentage of education hours lost due to allergies) and other variables. In addition, we identified factors associated with the impact of allergic symptoms on academic productivity through multivariable mixed models. RESULTS A total of 13,454 days (from 1970 patients) were studied. VAS education was strongly correlated with the WPAI+CIQ:AS impact of allergy symptoms on academic productivity (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58; 0.80]), VAS global allergy symptoms (0.70 [95% CI = 0.68; 0.71]), and VAS nose (0.66 [95% CI = 0.65; 0.68]). In multivariable regression models, immunotherapy showed a strong negative association with VAS education (regression coefficient = -2.32 [95% CI = -4.04; -0.59]). Poor rhinitis control, measured by the combined symptom-medication score, was associated with worse VAS education (regression coefficient = 0.88 [95% CI = 0.88; 0.92]), higher impact on academic productivity (regression coefficient = 0.69 [95% CI = 0.49; 0.90]), and higher percentage of missed education hours due to allergy (regression coefficient = 0.44 [95% CI = 0.25; 0.63]). CONCLUSION Allergy symptoms and worse rhinitis control are associated with worse academic productivity, whereas immunotherapy is associated with higher productivity.
Collapse
|
31
|
Sousa‐Pinto B, Anto A, Berger M, Dramburg S, Pfaar O, Klimek L, Jutel M, Czarlewski W, Bedbrook A, Valiulis A, Agache I, Amaral R, Ansotegui IJ, Bastl K, Berger U, Bergmann KC, Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Braido F, Brussino L, Cardona V, Casale T, Canonica GW, Cecchi L, Charpin D, Chivato T, Chu DK, Cingi C, Costa EM, Cruz AA, Devillier P, Durham SR, Ebisawa M, Fiocchi A, Fokkens WJ, Gemicioğlu B, Gotua M, Guzmán M, Haahtela T, Ivancevich JC, Kuna P, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Kvedariene V, Larenas‐Linnemann DE, Lipworth B, Laune D, Matricardi PM, Morais‐Almeida M, Mullol J, Naclerio R, Neffen H, Nekam K, Niedoszytko M, Okamoto Y, Papadopoulos NG, Park H, Passalacqua G, Patella V, Pelosi S, Pham‐Thi N, Popov TA, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Rodriguez‐Gonzales M, Rosario N, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sá‐Sousa A, Sastre J, Sheikh A, Ulrik CS, Taborda‐Barata L, Todo‐Bom A, Tomazic PV, Toppila‐Salmi S, Tripodi S, Tsiligianni I, Valovirta E, Ventura MT, Valero AA, Vieira RJ, Wallace D, Waserman S, Williams S, Yorgancioglu A, Zhang L, Zidarn M, Zuberbier J, Olze H, Antó JM, Zuberbier T, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J. Real-world data using mHealth apps in rhinitis, rhinosinusitis and their multimorbidities. Clin Transl Allergy 2022; 12:e12208. [PMID: 36434742 PMCID: PMC9673175 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital health is an umbrella term which encompasses eHealth and benefits from areas such as advanced computer sciences. eHealth includes mHealth apps, which offer the potential to redesign aspects of healthcare delivery. The capacity of apps to collect large amounts of longitudinal, real-time, real-world data enables the progression of biomedical knowledge. Apps for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis were searched for in the Google Play and Apple App stores, via an automatic market research tool recently developed using JavaScript. Over 1500 apps for allergic rhinitis and rhinosinusitis were identified, some dealing with multimorbidity. However, only six apps for rhinitis (AirRater, AllergyMonitor, AllerSearch, Husteblume, MASK-air and Pollen App) and one for rhinosinusitis (Galenus Health) have so far published results in the scientific literature. These apps were reviewed for their validation, discovery of novel allergy phenotypes, optimisation of identifying the pollen season, novel approaches in diagnosis and management (pharmacotherapy and allergen immunotherapy) as well as adherence to treatment. Published evidence demonstrates the potential of mobile health apps to advance in the characterisation, diagnosis and management of rhinitis and rhinosinusitis patients.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bahbah F, Gentil C, Sousa-Pinto B, Canonica GW, Devillier P, Pfaar O, Bousquet J. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in birch pollen allergic patients treated with sublingual immunotherapy reflect real life. Allergy 2022; 78:1113-1116. [PMID: 36226843 DOI: 10.1111/all.15550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
33
|
Sousa-Pinto B, Schünemann HJ, Sá-Sousa A, Vieira RJ, Amaral R, Anto JM, Klimek L, Czarlewski W, Mullol J, Pfaar O, Bedbrook A, Brussino L, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linnemann D, Okamoto Y, Ventura MT, Agache I, Ansotegui IJ, Bergmann KC, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Brozek J, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Carreiro-Martins P, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chivato T, Chu DK, Cingi C, Costa EM, Cruz AA, Del Giacco S, Devillier P, Eklund P, Fokkens WJ, Gemicioglu B, Haahtela T, Ivancevich JC, Ispayeva Z, Jutel M, Kuna P, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Kraxner H, Laune D, Lipworth B, Louis R, Makris M, Monti R, Morais-Almeida M, Mösges R, Niedoszytko M, Papadopoulos NG, Patella V, Pham-Thi N, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sheikh A, Sova M, Todo-Bom A, Taborda-Barata L, Toppila-Salmi S, Sastre J, Tsiligianni I, Valiulis A, Vandenplas O, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J. Comparison of rhinitis treatments using MASK-air® data and considering the minimal important difference. Allergy 2022; 77:3002-3014. [PMID: 35567393 DOI: 10.1111/all.15371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different treatments exist for allergic rhinitis (AR), including pharmacotherapy and allergen immunotherapy (AIT), but they have not been compared using direct patient data (i.e., "real-world data"). We aimed to compare AR pharmacological treatments on (i) daily symptoms, (ii) frequency of use in co-medication, (iii) visual analogue scales (VASs) on allergy symptom control considering the minimal important difference (MID) and (iv) the effect of AIT. METHODS We assessed the MASK-air® app data (May 2015-December 2020) by users self-reporting AR (16-90 years). We compared eight AR medication schemes on reported VAS of allergy symptoms, clustering data by the patient and controlling for confounding factors. We compared (i) allergy symptoms between patients with and without AIT and (ii) different drug classes used in co-medication. RESULTS We analysed 269,837 days from 10,860 users. Most days (52.7%) involved medication use. Median VAS levels were significantly higher in co-medication than in monotherapy (including the fixed combination azelastine-fluticasone) schemes. In adjusted models, azelastine-fluticasone was associated with lower average VAS global allergy symptoms than all other medication schemes, while the contrary was observed for oral corticosteroids. AIT was associated with a decrease in allergy symptoms in some medication schemes. A difference larger than the MID compared to no treatment was observed for oral steroids. Azelastine-fluticasone was the drug class with the lowest chance of being used in co-medication (adjusted OR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.71-0.80). CONCLUSION Median VAS levels were higher in co-medication than in monotherapy. Patients with more severe symptoms report a higher treatment, which is currently not reflected in guidelines.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lourenço O, Cvetkovski B, Kritikos V, House R, Scheire S, Costa EM, Fonseca JA, Menditto E, Bedbrook A, Bialek S, Briedis V, Boussery K, Canonica GW, Haahtela T, Kuna P, Mullol J, Orlando V, Samolinski B, Wallace D, Duggan C, Paulino E, Pinto GS, Söderlund L, Bousquet J, Bosnic‐Anticevich S. Management of allergic rhinitis symptoms in the pharmacy Pocket guide 2022. Clin Transl Allergy 2022; 12:e12183. [PMID: 36225265 PMCID: PMC9533218 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Allergic rhinitis (AR) management requires a coordinated effort from healthcare providers and patients. Pharmacists are key members of these integrated care pathways resolving medication-related problems, optimizing regimens, improving adherence and recommending therapies while establishing liaisons between patients and physicians. Methods Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) first published a reference document on the pharmacist's role in allergic rhinitis management in 2004. Several guidelines were developed over the past 20 years improving the care of allergic rhinitis patients through an evidence-based, integrated care approach. Results This ARIA/EAACI/FIP Position Paper is based on the latest ARIA in the Pharmacy guidelines and provides: (a) a structured approach to pharmacists identifying people with AR and/or allergic conjunctivitis as well as those at risk of poor disease control; (b) an evidence-based clinical decision support tool for optimising the management of allergic rhinitis in the community pharmacy; and (c) a framework of referral to the physician. Conclusion This document is not intended to be a mandatory standard of care but is provided as a basis for pharmacists and their staff to develop relevant local standards of care for their patients, within their local practice environment. Pharmacy care varies between countries, and the guide should be adapted to the local situation.
Collapse
|
35
|
Sousa-Pinto B, Sá-Sousa A, Vieira RJ, Amaral R, Klimek L, Czarlewski W, Antó JM, Pfaar O, Bedbrook A, Kvedariene V, Ventura MT, Ansotegui IJ, Bergmann KC, Brussino L, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Carreiro-Martins P, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chivato T, Chu DK, Cingi C, Costa EM, Cruz AA, De Feo G, Devillier P, Fokkens WJ, Gaga M, Gemicioğlu B, Haahtela T, Ivancevich JC, Ispayeva Z, Jutel M, Kuna P, Kaidashev I, Kraxner H, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Laune D, Lipworth B, Louis R, Makris M, Monti R, Morais-Almeida M, Mösges R, Mullol J, Odemyr M, Okamoto Y, Papadopoulos NG, Patella V, Pham-Thi N, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sova M, Todo-Bom A, Taborda-Barata L, Tomazic PV, Toppila-Salmi S, Sastre J, Tsiligianni I, Valiulis A, Vandenplas O, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J. Behavioural patterns in allergic rhinitis medication in Europe: A study using MASK-air ® real-world data. Allergy 2022; 77:2699-2711. [PMID: 35258105 DOI: 10.1111/all.15275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Co-medication is common among patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), but its dimension and patterns are unknown. This is particularly relevant since AR is understood differently across European countries, as reflected by rhinitis-related search patterns in Google Trends. This study aims to assess AR co-medication and its regional patterns in Europe, using real-world data. METHODS We analysed 2015-2020 MASK-air® European data. We compared days under no medication, monotherapy and co-medication using the visual analogue scale (VAS) levels for overall allergic symptoms ('VAS Global Symptoms') and impact of AR on work. We assessed the monthly use of different medication schemes, performing separate analyses by region (defined geographically or by Google Trends patterns). We estimated the average number of different drugs reported per patient within 1 year. RESULTS We analysed 222,024 days (13,122 users), including 63,887 days (28.8%) under monotherapy and 38,315 (17.3%) under co-medication. The median 'VAS Global Symptoms' was 7 for no medication days, 14 for monotherapy and 21 for co-medication (p < .001). Medication use peaked during the spring, with similar patterns across different European regions (defined geographically or by Google Trends). Oral H1 -antihistamines were the most common medication in single and co-medication. Each patient reported using an annual average of 2.7 drugs, with 80% reporting two or more. CONCLUSIONS Allergic rhinitis medication patterns are similar across European regions. One third of treatment days involved co-medication. These findings suggest that patients treat themselves according to their symptoms (irrespective of how they understand AR) and that co-medication use is driven by symptom severity.
Collapse
|
36
|
Canonica GW, Bourdin A, Peters AT, Desrosiers M, Bachert C, Weidinger S, Simpson EL, Daizadeh N, Chen Z, Kamat S, Khan AH, Chao J, Graham NMH, Laws E, Rossi AB, Ardeleanu M, Mannent LP, Amin N, Ortiz B, Deniz Y, Djandji M, Rowe PJ. Dupilumab Demonstrates Rapid Onset of Response Across Three Type 2 Inflammatory Diseases. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:1515-1526. [PMID: 35259535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 inflammatory diseases often coexist in patients. Dupilumab targets type 2 inflammation and has demonstrated treatment benefits in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with an acceptable safety profile. OBJECTIVE This post hoc analysis across five phase 3 studies in patients with moderate to severe AD or asthma, or severe CRSwNP, evaluated time of onset and duration of the treatment response. METHODS Patients received subcutaneous dupilumab 200/300 mg or placebo. Assessments included the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, and Dermatology Life Quality Index in AD; pre-bronchodilator FEV1, daily morning peak expiratory flow, and symptom scores in asthma; and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, daily nasal congestion, and loss of smell scores in CRSwNP. RESULTS At week 2 after the initiation of dupilumab versus placebo, 67.8% versus 36.5% of AD patients achieved a clinically meaningful benefit (Eczema Area and Severity Index: 50% or greater improvement; Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: 3 point or greater improvement; or Dermatology Life Quality Index: 4 point or greater improvement) (P < .001). Moreover, 61.6% versus 39.9% of asthma patients achieved improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 100 mL or greater and 48.8% versus 26.3% achieved 200 mL or greater improvement (both P < .001); 33.2% versus 5.6% of CRSwNP patients regained a sense of smell (P < .001). Treatment effects further improved or were sustained to the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Clinically meaningful responses were achieved rapidly after the first dupilumab dose in AD, asthma, or CRSwNP and were sustained throughout treatment (see Video in this article's Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org).
Collapse
|
37
|
Porsbjerg CM, Menzies-Gow AN, Tran TN, Murray RB, Unni B, Audrey Ang SL, Alacqua M, Al-Ahmad M, Al-Lehebi R, Altraja A, Belevskiy AS, Björnsdóttir US, Bourdin A, Busby J, Canonica GW, Christoff GC, Cosio BG, Costello RW, FitzGerald JM, Fonseca JA, Hansen S, Heaney LG, Heffler E, Hew M, Iwanaga T, Jackson DJ, Kocks JWH, Kallieri M, Bruce Ko HK, Koh MS, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lehtimäki LA, Loukides S, Lugogo N, Maspero J, Papaioannou AI, Perez-de-Llano L, Pitrez PM, Popov TA, Rasmussen LM, Rhee CK, Sadatsafavi M, Schmid J, Siddiqui S, Taillé C, Taube C, Torres-Duque CA, Ulrik C, Upham JW, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Bulathsinhala L, Carter V, Chaudhry I, Eleangovan N, Hosseini N, Rowlands MA, Price DB, van Boven JFM. Global Variability in Administrative Approval Prescription Criteria for Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:1202-1216.e23. [PMID: 34990866 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regulatory bodies have approved five biologics for severe asthma. However, regional differences in accessibility may limit the global potential for personalized medicine. OBJECTIVE To compare global differences in ease of access to biologics. METHODS In April 2021, national prescription criteria for omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab were reviewed by severe asthma experts collaborating in the International Severe Asthma Registry. Outcomes (per country, per biologic) were (1) country-specific prescription criteria and (2) development of the Biologic Accessibility Score (BACS). The BACS composite score incorporates 10 prescription criteria, each with a maximum score of 10 points. Referenced to European Medicines Agency marketing authorization specifications, a higher score reflects easier access. RESULTS Biologic prescription criteria differed substantially across 28 countries from five continents. Blood eosinophil count thresholds (usually ≥300 cells/μL) and exacerbations were key requirements for anti-IgE/anti-IL-5/5R prescriptions in around 80% of licensed countries. Most countries (40% for dupilumab to 54% for mepolizumab) require two or more moderate or severe exacerbations, whereas numbers ranged from none to four. Moreover, 0% (for reslizumab) to 21% (for omalizumab) of countries required long-term oral corticosteroid use. The BACS highlighted marked between-country differences in ease of access. For omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab, only two, one, four, and seven countries, respectively, scored equal or higher than the European Medicines Agency reference BACS. For reslizumab, all countries scored lower. CONCLUSIONS Although some differences were expected in country-specific biologic prescription criteria and ease of access, the substantial differences found in the current study present a challenge to implementing precision medicine across the world.
Collapse
|
38
|
Papi A, Singh D, Virchow JC, Canonica GW, Vele A, Georges G. Normalisation of airflow limitation in asthma: Post-hoc analyses of TRIMARAN and TRIGGER. Clin Transl Allergy 2022; 12:e12145. [PMID: 35450196 PMCID: PMC9014197 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In asthma, persistent airflow limitation (PAL) is associated with poorer control, lung function decline and exacerbations. Using post‐hoc analyses we evaluated: the relationship between post‐salbutamol PAL at screening, airflow limitation (AL) during 52 weeks treatment with extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G) versus BDP/FF and the risk of moderate/severe asthma exacerbations. Methods TRIMARAN and TRIGGER were double‐blind studies comparing BDP/FF/G with BDP/FF (TRIMARAN medium‐dose ICS; TRIGGER high‐dose) in adults with uncontrolled asthma. Patients were subgrouped according to post‐salbutamol PAL status at screening, and AL over the 52‐week treatment period. Results Most patients with post‐salbutamol PAL at screening had AL at all on‐treatment visits (TRIMARAN 62.8%; TRIGGER 66.8%). A significantly higher proportion of patients had normalised airflow on ≥1 follow‐up visit when receiving BDP/FF/G than BDP/FF (TRIMARAN 44.1 vs. 33.1% [p = 0.003]; TRIGGER 40.1 vs. 26.0% [p < 0.001]). In patients with post‐salbutamol PAL at screening and normalised AL at ≥1 follow‐up visit, exacerbation rates were 15% (p = 0.105) and 19% (p = 0.039) lower in TRIMARAN and TRIGGER versus those with AL on all visits. There was a trend to lower exacerbation rates in patients receiving BDP/FF/G than BDP/FF, particularly in patients in whom AL was normalised. Conclusion In these analyses, AL in asthma was associated with an increased exacerbation incidence. Inhaled triple therapy with extrafine BDP/FF/G was more likely to normalise airflow, and was associated with a trend to a lower exacerbation rate than BDP/FF, particularly in the subgroup of patients in whom treatment was associated with airflow normalisation. ClinicalTrials.gov: TRIMARAN, NCT02676076; TRIGGER, NCT02676089.
Collapse
|
39
|
Lommatzsch M, Brusselle GG, Canonica GW, Jackson DJ, Nair P, Buhl R, Virchow JC. Disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs. Lancet 2022; 399:1664-1668. [PMID: 35461560 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00331-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
40
|
Mullol J, Laidlaw TM, Bachert C, Mannent LP, Canonica GW, Han J, Maspero JF, Picado C, Daizadeh N, Ortiz B, Li Y, Ruddy M, Laws E, Amin N. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and a clinical diagnosis of NSAID-ERD: Results from two randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trials. Allergy 2022; 77:1231-1244. [PMID: 34459002 PMCID: PMC9292324 DOI: 10.1111/all.15067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background About one‐tenth of patients with difficult‐to‐treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have comorbid non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID‐ERD). Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared interleukin (IL)‐4/IL‐13 receptor component, is an approved add‐on treatment in severe CRSwNP. This post hoc analysis evaluated dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with CRSwNP with/without NSAID‐ERD. Methods Data were pooled from the phase 3 SINUS‐24 and SINUS‐52 studies in adults with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP who received dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. CRSwNP, nasal airflow, lung function, and asthma control outcomes at Week 24 were evaluated, and treatment–subgroup interactions were assessed for patients with and without NSAID‐ERD. Results Of 724 patients, 204 (28.2%) had a diagnosis of NSAID‐ERD. At Week 24, least squares mean treatment differences demonstrated significant improvements in nasal polyp score, nasal congestion (NC), Lund–Mackay computed tomography, 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22), Total Symptom Score (TSS), rhinosinusitis severity visual analog scale, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), six‐item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and improvement in smell with dupilumab versus placebo (all p < .0001) in patients with NSAID‐ERD. Treatment comparisons demonstrated significantly greater improvements with dupilumab in patients with versus without NSAID‐ERD for NC (p = .0044), SNOT‐22 (p = .0313), TSS (p = .0425), and PNIF (p = .0123). Conclusions In patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, dupilumab significantly improved objective measures and patient‐reported symptoms to a greater extent in the presence of comorbid NSAID‐ERD than without. Dupilumab was well tolerated in patients with/without NSAID‐ERD.
Collapse
|
41
|
Sousa-Pinto B, Azevedo LF, Sá-Sousa A, Vieira RJ, Amaral R, Klimek L, Czarlewski W, Anto JM, Bedbrook A, Kvedariene V, Ventura MT, Ansotegui IJ, Bergmann KC, Brussino L, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Carreiro-Martins P, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chivato T, Chu DK, Cingi C, Costa EM, Cruz AA, De Feo G, Devillier P, Fokkens WJ, Gaga M, Gemicioğlu B, Haahtela T, Ivancevich JC, Ispayeva Z, Jutel M, Kuna P, Kaidashev I, Kraxner H, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Laune D, Lipworth B, Louis R, Makris M, Monti R, Morais-Almeida M, Mösges R, Mullol J, Odemyr M, Okamoto Y, Papadopoulos NG, Patella V, Pham-Thi N, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sova M, Todo-Bom A, Taborda-Barata L, Tomazic PV, Toppila-Salmi S, Sastre J, Tsiligianni I, Valiulis A, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Fonseca JA, Bousquet J, Pfaar O. Allergen immunotherapy in MASK-air users in real-life: Results of a Bayesian mixed-effects model. Clin Transl Allergy 2022; 12:e12128. [PMID: 35344295 PMCID: PMC8967259 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence regarding the effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on allergic rhinitis has been provided mostly by randomised controlled trials, with little data from real‐life studies. Objective To compare the reported control of allergic rhinitis symptoms in three groups of users of the MASK‐air® app: those receiving sublingual AIT (SLIT), those receiving subcutaneous AIT (SCIT), and those receiving no AIT. Methods We assessed the MASK‐air® data of European users with self‐reported grass pollen allergy, comparing the data reported by patients receiving SLIT, SCIT and no AIT. Outcome variables included the daily impact of allergy symptoms globally and on work (measured by visual analogue scales—VASs), and a combined symptom‐medication score (CSMS). We applied Bayesian mixed‐effects models, with clustering by patient, country and pollen season. Results We analysed a total of 42,756 days from 1,093 grass allergy patients, including 18,479 days of users under AIT. Compared to no AIT, SCIT was associated with similar VAS levels and CSMS. Compared to no AIT, SLIT‐tablet was associated with lower values of VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 7.5 units out of 100; 95% credible interval [95%CrI] = −12.1;−2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 5.0; 95%CrI = −8.5;−1.5), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 3.7; 95%CrI = −9.3;2.2). When compared to SCIT, SLIT‐tablet was associated with lower VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 10.2; 95%CrI = −17.2;−2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 7.8; 95%CrI = −15.1;0.2), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 9.3; 95%CrI = −18.5;0.2). Conclusion In patients with grass pollen allergy, SLIT‐tablet, when compared to no AIT and to SCIT, is associated with lower reported symptom severity. Future longitudinal studies following internationally‐harmonised standards for performing and reporting real‐world data in AIT are needed to better understand its ‘real‐world’ effectiveness.
Collapse
|
42
|
Walter Canonica G. Corrigendum to “Manifesto on small airway involvement and management in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an Interasma (Global Asthma Association - GAA) and World Allergy Organization (WAO) document endorsed by Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) and Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN)” [World Allergy Organ (2016) 9-37]. World Allergy Organ J 2022; 15:100596. [PMID: 35079320 PMCID: PMC8760541 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
43
|
Sousa‐Pinto B, Azevedo LF, Jutel M, Agache I, Canonica GW, Czarlewski W, Papadopoulos NG, Bergmann K, Devillier P, Laune D, Klimek L, Anto A, Anto JM, Eklund P, Almeida R, Bedbrook A, Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Brough HA, Brussino L, Cardona V, Casale T, Cecchi L, Charpin D, Chivato T, Costa EM, Cruz AA, Dramburg S, Durham SR, De Feo G, Gerth van Wijk R, Fokkens WJ, Gemicioglu B, Haahtela T, Illario M, Ivancevich JC, Kvedariene V, Kuna P, Larenas‐Linnemann DE, Makris M, Mathieu‐Dupas E, Melén E, Morais‐Almeida M, Mösges R, Mullol J, Nadeau KC, Pham‐Thi N, O’Hehir R, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Samolinski B, Sheikh A, Stellato C, Todo‐Bom A, Tomazic PV, Toppila‐Salmi S, Valero A, Valiulis A, Ventura MT, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Vries G, Eerd M, Zieglmayer P, Zuberbier T, Pfaar O, Almeida Fonseca J, Bousquet J. Development and validation of combined symptom-medication scores for allergic rhinitis. Allergy 2021; 77:2147-2162. [PMID: 34932829 DOI: 10.1111/all.15199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Validated combined symptom-medication scores (CSMSs) are needed to investigate the effects of allergic rhinitis treatments. This study aimed to use real-life data from the MASK-air® app to generate and validate hypothesis- and data-driven CSMSs. METHODS We used MASK-air® data to assess the concurrent validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of one hypothesis-driven CSMS (modified CSMS: mCSMS), one mixed hypothesis- and data-driven score (mixed score), and several data-driven CSMSs. The latter were generated with MASK-air® data following cluster analysis and regression models or factor analysis. These CSMSs were compared with scales measuring (i) the impact of rhinitis on work productivity (visual analogue scale [VAS] of work of MASK-air® , and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Allergy Specific [WPAI-AS]), (ii) quality-of-life (EQ-5D VAS) and (iii) control of allergic diseases (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test [CARAT]). RESULTS We assessed 317,176 days of MASK-air® use from 17,780 users aged 16-90 years, in 25 countries. The mCSMS and the factor analyses-based CSMSs displayed poorer validity and responsiveness compared to the remaining CSMSs. The latter displayed moderate-to-strong correlations with the tested comparators, high test-retest reliability and moderate-to-large responsiveness. Among data-driven CSMSs, a better performance was observed for cluster analyses-based CSMSs. High accuracy (capacity of discriminating different levels of rhinitis control) was observed for the latter (AUC-ROC = 0.904) and for the mixed CSMS (AUC-ROC = 0.820). CONCLUSION The mixed CSMS and the cluster-based CSMSs presented medium-high validity, reliability and accuracy, rendering them as candidates for primary endpoints in future rhinitis trials.
Collapse
|
44
|
Kerkhof M, Tran TN, Allehebi R, Canonica GW, Heaney LG, Hew M, Perez de Llano L, Wechsler ME, Bulathsinhala L, Carter VA, Chaudhry I, Eleangovan N, Murray RB, Price CA, Price DB. Asthma Phenotyping in Primary Care: Applying the International Severe Asthma Registry Eosinophil Phenotype Algorithm Across All Asthma Severities. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:4353-4370. [PMID: 34403837 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We developed an eosinophil phenotype gradient algorithm and applied it to a large severe asthma cohort (International Severe Asthma Registry). OBJECTIVE We sought to reapply this algorithm in a UK primary care asthma cohort, quantify the eosinophilic phenotype, and assess the relationship between the likelihood of an eosinophilic phenotype and asthma severity/health care resource use (HCRU). METHODS Patients age 13 years and older with active asthma and blood eosinophil count or 1 or greater, who were included from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, were categorized according to the likelihood of eosinophilic phenotype using the International Severe Asthma Registry gradient eosinophilic algorithm. Patient demographic, clinical and HCRU characteristics were described for each phenotype. RESULTS Of 241,006 patients, 50.3%, 22.2%, and 21.9% most likely (grade 3), likely (grade 2), and least likely (grade 1), respectively, had an eosinophilic phenotype, and 5.6% had a noneosinophilic phenotype (grade 0). Compared with patients with noneosinophilic asthma, those most likely to have an eosinophilic phenotype tended to have more comorbidities (percentage with Charlson comorbidity index of ≥2: 28.2% vs 6.9%) and experienced more asthma attacks (percentage with one or more attack: 24.8% vs 15.3%). These patients were also more likely to have asthma that was difficult to treat (31.1% vs 18.3%), to receive more intensive treatment (percentage on Global Initiative for Asthma 2020 step 4 or 5: 44.2% vs 27.5%), and greater HCRU (eg, 10.8 vs 7.9 general practitioner all-cause consultations per year). CONCLUSIONS The eosinophilic asthma phenotype predominates in primary care and is associated with greater asthma severity and HCRU. These patients may benefit from earlier and targeted asthma therapy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Busse WW, Paggiaro P, Muñoz X, Casale TB, Castro M, Canonica GW, Douglass JA, Tohda Y, Daizadeh N, Ortiz B, Pandit-Abid N. Impact of baseline patient characteristics on dupilumab efficacy in type 2 asthma. Eur Respir J 2021; 58:13993003.04605-2020. [PMID: 34326187 PMCID: PMC8522685 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.04605-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Severe asthma affects an estimated 5–10% of the total asthma patient population [1]. Various demographic factors, such as sex, age, obesity and age of onset, have been associated with asthma disease severity [2, 3], and the efficacy of asthma treatments has previously been found to vary depending on patient demographics [4, 5]. Dupilumab treatment versus placebo improved exacerbation rate and lung function outcomes in patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma and high type 2 biomarkers at baseline, regardless of baseline characteristics in the phase 3 QUEST studyhttps://bit.ly/3yR7MlD
Collapse
|
46
|
Canonica GW, Klimek L, Acaster S, Dollner R, Kaulsay R, Lo SH, Price DB, Scadding GK, Valovirta E, Zieglmayer P. Burden of allergic rhinitis and impact of MP-AzeFlu from the patient perspective: pan European patient survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2021; 37:1259-1272. [PMID: 33840316 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1911973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this survey were to (1) assess the burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) from the patient perspective, (2) investigate MP-AzeFlu use in real life and its impact on patients' lives and (3) explore factors associated with treatment satisfaction. METHODS A cross-sectional, quantitative, online, questionnaire-based survey was conducted in seven European countries (March-June 2019). Questions explored AR burden and treatment satisfaction. Satisfaction was assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication 9-item (TSQM-9; max score = 100). Participants (aged ≥18 years) had a doctor/healthcare provider confirmed AR diagnosis and used MP-AzeFlu within the last year. RESULTS Pre-MP-AzeFlu treatment, participants (n = 1004) reported an average of 3.3 (SD:3.5) doctor visits/year, 8.1 (SD:11.0) days/year absenteeism and 15.8 (SD:18.9) days/year presenteeism due to AR. Only 48% of participants used MP-AzeFlu twice/day as recommended. Post-MP-AzeFlu 57% of participants reported better QoL, 47% reported fewer doctor visits and 52% discontinued polypharmacy. Absenteeism and presenteeism were reduced by 2.5 (SD 10.0) and 7.3 (SD:16.0) days/year, respectively. 70% of participants were more/much more satisfied with MP-AzeFlu versus previous AR treatment(s), and ≥70% were satisfied/extremely satisfied with its ability to prevent/treat AR, relieve symptoms and with its onset of action. Mean global, effectiveness and convenience TSQM-9 scores were 70.0 (SD:19.8), 68.3 (SD:21.6) and 72.7 (SD:20.4), respectively. Treatment satisfaction and effectiveness were significantly improved when MP-AzeFlu was taken as recommended. CONCLUSIONS The impact of AR on patients' lives remains high. Real-life use of MP-AzeFlu reduces that impact and is associated with a high level of effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction.
Collapse
|
47
|
Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Agache I, Bedbrook A, Akdis CA, Canonica GW, Chivato T, Al-Ahmad M, Abdul Latiff AH, Ansotegui IJ, Bachert C, Baharuddin A, Bergmann KC, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bjermer L, Bonini M, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bosse I, Brough HA, Brussino L, Calderon MA, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Carreiro-Martins P, Casale T, Cecchi L, Cepeda Sarabia AM, Chkhartishvili E, Chu DK, Cirule I, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Del Giacco S, Demoly P, Devillier P, Dokic D, Durham SL, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal Y, Emuzyte R, Gamkrelidze A, Fauquert JL, Fiocchi A, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Fontaine JF, Gawlik R, Gelincik A, Gemicioglu B, Gereda JE, Gerth van Wijk R, Gomez RM, Gotua M, Grisle I, Guzmán MA, Haahtela T, Halken S, Heffler E, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Hossny E, Hrubiško M, Irani C, Ivancevich JC, Ispayeva Z, Julge K, Kaidashev I, Kalayci O, Khaitov M, Klimek L, Knol E, Kowalski ML, Kraxner H, Kull I, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Kritikos V, Lauerma A, Lau S, Laune D, Levin M, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Lombardi C, Lourenço OM, Mahboub B, Malling HJ, Manning P, Marshall GD, Melén E, Meltzer EO, Miculinic N, Milenkovic B, Moin M, Montefort S, Morais-Almeida M, Mortz CG, Mösges R, Mullol J, Namazova Baranova L, Neffen H, Nekam K, Niedoszytko M, Odemyr M, O'Hehir RE, Ollert M, O'Mahony L, Ohta K, Okamoto Y, Okubo K, Pajno GB, Palomares O, Palkonen S, Panzner P, G Papadopoulos N, Park HS, Passalacqua G, Patella V, Pawankar R, Pham-Thi N, Plavec D, Popov TA, Recto M, Regateiro FS, Riggioni C, Roberts G, Rodriguez-Gonzales M, Rosario N, Rottem M, Rouadi PW, Ryan D, Samolinski B, Sanchez-Borges M, Serpa FS, Sastre J, Scadding GK, Shamji MH, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schünemann HJ, Sheikh A, Scichilone N, Sisul JC, Sofiev M, Solé D, Sooronbaev T, Soto-Martinez M, Soto-Quiros M, Sova M, Schwarze J, Skypala I, Suppli-Ulrik C, Taborda-Barata L, Todo-Bom A, Torres MJ, Valentin-Rostan M, Tomazic PV, Valero A, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Untersmayr E, Urrutia-Pereira M, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Vandenplas O, Ventura MT, Vichyanond P, Wagenmann M, Wallace D, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Wang DY, Waserman S, Wong GW, Yorgancioglu A, Yusuf OM, Zernotti M, Zhang L, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Jutel M. ARIA-EAACI care pathways for allergen immunotherapy in respiratory allergy. Clin Transl Allergy 2021; 11:e12014. [PMID: 34136127 PMCID: PMC8190541 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
48
|
Desrosiers M, Mannent LP, Amin N, Canonica GW, Hellings PW, Gevaert P, Mullol J, Lee SE, Fujieda S, Han JK, Hopkins C, Fokkens W, Jankowski R, Cho SH, Mao X, Zhang M, Rice MS, Khan AH, Kamat S, Patel N, Graham NMH, Ruddy M, Bachert C. Dupilumab reduces systemic corticosteroid use and sinonasal surgery rate in CRSwNP. Rhinology 2021; 59:301-311. [PMID: 33847325 DOI: 10.4193/rhin20.415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a type 2 inflammatory disease with a high symptom burden and poor quality of life. Treatment options include recurrent surgeries and/or frequent systemic corticosteroids (SCS). Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key drivers of type 2-mediated inflammation. We report results of pooled analyses from 2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies (SINUS 24 [NCT02912468]; SINUS-52 [NCT02898454]) to evaluate dupilumab effect versus placebo in adults with CRSwNP with/without SCS use and sinonasal surgery. METHODOLOGY SINUS-24 patients were randomised 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg (n=143) or placebo (n=133) every 2 weeks (q2w) for 24 weeks. SINUS-52 patients were randomised 1:1:1 to 52 weeks of subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg q2w (n=150), 24 weeks q2w followed by 28 weeks of dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (n=145) or 52 weeks of placebo q2w (n=153). RESULTS Dupilumab reduced the number of patients undergoing sinonasal surgery (82.6%), the need for in-study SCS use (73.9%), and SCS courses (75.3%). Significant improvements were observed with dupilumab vs placebo regardless of prior sinonasal surgery or SCS use in nasal polyp, nasal congestion, Lund-MacKay, and Sinonasal Outcome Test (22-items) scores, and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. CONCLUSIONS Dupilumab demonstrated significant improvements in disease signs and symptoms and reduced the need for sino-nasal surgery and SCS use versus placebo in patients with severe CRSwNP, regardless of SCS use in the previous 2 years, or prior sinonasal surgery.
Collapse
|
49
|
Klimek L, Jutel M, Akdis CA, Bousquet J, Akdis M, Torres MJ, Agache I, Canonica GW, Del Giacco S, O'Mahony L, Shamji MH, Schwarze J, Untersmayr E, Ring J, Bedbrook A, Worm M, Zuberbier T, Knol E, Hoffmann‐Sommergruber K, Chivato T. ARIA-EAACI statement on severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines - An EAACI-ARIA Position Paper. Allergy 2021; 76:1624-1628. [PMID: 33378789 DOI: 10.1111/all.14726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Further to the approval of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine BNT162b2, several severe anaphylaxis cases occured within the first few days of public vaccination. An investigation is taking place to understand the cases and their triggers. The vaccine will be administered to a large number of individuals worldwide and there are raising concerns that severe adverse events might occur. With the current information, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) states its position for the following preliminary recommendations that are to be revised as soon as more data emerge. To minimize the risk of severe allergic reactions in vaccinated individuals, it is urgently required to understand the specific nature of the reported severe allergic reactions, including the background medical history of the individuals affected and the mechanisms involved. To achieve this goal, all clinical and laboratory information should be collected and reported. Mild and moderate allergic patients should not be excluded from the vaccine as this could have a significant impact on reaching the goal of population immunity. Healthcare practitioners vaccinating against COVID-19 are required to be sufficiently prepared to recognize and treat anaphylaxis properly with the ability to administer adrenaline. Further to vaccine administration, a mandatory observation period of at least 15 minutes should be followed for all individuals. The current data have not shown any higher risk for patients suffering from allergic rhinitis or asthma, and this message should be clearly stated by physicians to enable our patients to trust the vaccine. More than 30% of the population suffers from allergic diseases and the benefit of the vaccination clearly outweighs the risk of severe COVID-19 development.
Collapse
|
50
|
Bousquet J, Schröder-Bernhardi D, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Costa EM, Czarlewski W, Devillier P, Fonseca JA, Klimek L, Kuna P, Lourenco O, Mullol J, Pfaar O, Pham-Thi N, Samolinski B, Saueressig J, Scadding GK, Stroh AK, Scheire S, Van Ganse E, Zuberbier T. Heterogeneity of the pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis in Europe based on MIDAS and OTCims platforms. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 51:1033-1045. [PMID: 33880889 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The practice of allergology varies widely between countries, and the costs and sales for the treatment of rhinitis differ depending on practices and health systems. To understand these differences and their implications, the rhinitis market was studied in some of the EU countries. METHODS We conducted a pharmaco-epidemiological database analysis to assess the medications that were being prescribed for allergic rhinitis in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018. We used the IQVIA platforms for prescribed medicines (MIDAS®- Meaningful Integration of Data, Analytics and Services) and for OTC medicines (OTC International Market Tracking-OTCims). We selected the five most important markets in the EU (France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain). RESULTS Intranasal decongestants were excluded from the analyses because they are rarely prescribed for allergic rhinitis. For both Standard Units (SU) and costs, France is leading the other countries. In terms of SU, the four other countries are similar. For costs, Poland is lower than the three others. However, medication use differs largely. For 2018, in SU, intranasal corticosteroid is the first treatment in Poland (70.0%), France (51.3%), Spain (51.1%) and Germany (50.3%), whereas the Italian market is dominated by systemic antihistamines (41.4%) followed by intranasal corticosteroids (30.1%). Results of other years were similar. DISCUSSION There are major differences between countries in terms of rhinoconjunctivitis medication usage.
Collapse
|