Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair in a Patient With Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Draining Into the Coronary Sinus - Cannulation Technique and Surgical Management

Persistence of the left superior vena cava is often an incidental finding during cardiac surgical procedures. In minimally invasive valvular surgery, it may jeopardise venous drainage and myocardial protection. This How-To-Do-It paper describes the cannulation strategy in a case of minimally invasive mitral surgery in a patient with persistence of the left superior vena cava and absence of the anonymous vein detected with preoperative multimodality imaging.

Primary mitral valve regurgitation scheduled for cardiac surgery: no longer need for coronary angiography? A clinical retrospective & HTA analysis

Introduction

In patients (pts) undergoing cardiac surgery for primary mitral regurgitation (PMR), coronary angiography (CA) is always scheduled shortly before surgery to rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD), despite this population is often young and with relatively low risk for CAD. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) could be an alternative approach to evaluate coronary arteries, at least ruling out significant CAD in selected pts, due to its high negative predictive value.

Purpose

A safer, more appropriate and efficient clinical and diagnostic pathway for patients undergoing cardiac surgery for PMR by stratifying patients prior cardiac surgery according to pretest probability score (PTP) and therefore shifting imaging of epicardial coronary arteries from invasive to noninvasive in specific patients subsets.

Methods

A retrospective analysis (Jan 2014–Dec 2020) was carried out through the extraction of 7343 electronic medical records of pts who underwent cardiac valve surgery. In 1556 pts with PMR (1195 with no-CAD and 361 with CAD) a PTP was retrospectively calculated according to Genders, 2012, to stratify their risk of CAD.

A Decision oriented Health Technology Assessment (DoHTA) and a cost analysis were also performed to support the analysis results. A survey was distributed to a team of experts with a multidisciplinary background to analyze the most significant evaluation areas (Economic Aspects, Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, Innovation) and the sub-criteria related to them.

Following the Core Model Eunethta as a guideline, a Rapid Report HTA has been drawn up to identify the best solution.

Results

Patients characteristics are listed in Picture 1. Pts with normal coronary arteries showed a PTP low-to intermediate while pts with high PTP had CAD and therefore had a real pretest need for a CA (average 11 percent ± 9 in noCAD group vs 20 percent ± 14 in the CAD group). In two thirds of PMR population coronary angiography could have been avoided according to a PTP score <15 percent.

The cost analysis results were significantly lower in CTCA (1,315.00 EUR vs 180.00 EUR, CA vs CTCA respectively), The Decision Oriented HTA conducted by a multidisciplinary team showed a relevant preference for the new pathway (Picture 2) with a score of 70.23 percent of preference among the Team.

Conclusions

This new pathway, already proposed for selected pts in ESC guidelines on valve diseases (class IIA, LOE C) could be always adopted in PMR pts with low-to intermediate PTP score undergoing cardiac surgery. It could improve workflow efficiency and reduce LOS, and last but not least, avoid an invasive test, reduce radiation exposure and AKI risk in in a relatively young population

The DoHTA provided a more effective and efficient support to the decision-making process.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Picture 1. Patients characteristics (noCAD-CAD)Picture 2. HTA Score CTCA vs CA

AB0379 BARICITINIB IN POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA AND GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: REPORT OF SIX CASES

Background:

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the cornerstone of the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), but they are associated with several adverse events (AEs). Moreover, a considerable proportion of patients relapse during GC tapering.

Objectives:

To describe the efficacy and safety of the JAK-inhibitor baricitinib (BARI) in a group of patients with PMR and/or GCA.

Methods:

Case series of patients with PMR and/or GCA with a refractory disease course, despite several lines of therapy, including methotrexate (MTX) and tocilizumab (TCZ), started treatment with BARI. All patients underwent periodic, standardised clinical and laboratory examinations, and also FDG-PET/CT. PMR-activity score (AS) was calculated at each visit except in patients with isolated large vessel vasculitis (LVV) or GCA.

Results:

A total of six patients (five females and one male, median age 64 years, range 50-83) were treated with BARI. Two of them had isolated PMR (patients #1 and #6), two had PMR with associated LVV (patients #2 and #5), and one (patient #3) had cranial-GCA. Demographic and clinical characteristics are provided in Table 1. At the time of starting BARI, patients were taking a median prednisone dose of 8.75 mg/day (range 0-25), and the 4 patients with PMR±LVV had a median PMR-activity score (PMR-AS) of 23.3 (indicating high disease activity), which decreased to 1.58 after 6 months of treatment with BARI. Two of them could stop GC and continued BARI monotherapy (in one case, BARI was tapered down to 2 mg/day after 12 months).

After starting BARI, patient #3 (GCA) could gradually taper prednisone from 25 mg/day to 10 mg/day in six months, without reporting fever or headache. After one year of treatment, she feels well while taking prednisone 7.5 mg/day.

Patient #4 (LVV) remained clinically stable during the treatment with BARI, but a follow-up FDG-PET/CT showed LVV, and we decided to stop BARI and restart TCZ. After 4 months of treatment with BARI, patient #5 suffered from pneumonia, while she was also taking prednisone 15 mg/day. BARI was therefore stopped. No other AEs attributable to BARI were detected.

Conclusion:

BARI appears as an appealing option for treating patients with PMR and/or GCA. Although these preliminary results should be confirmed by a RCT, BARI lowered rapidly disease activity and exerted a significant steroid-sparing effect, allowing GC withdrawal in 2 out of 6 patients.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients.

Patient #SexAgeDiagnosisPrevious treatmentDisease duration (months)PMR-AS1F66PMRMTX, HCQ, SSZ25.540.52F78PMR+LVVTCZ, MTX41.828.83F61GCACYC, MMF, TCZ119.8N/A4F60LVVTCZ16.4N/A5F83PMR+LVVMTX, TCZ24.415.26M50PMRMTX24.617.8

CYC: cyclophosphamide, GCA: giant cell arteritis, HCQ: hydroxychloroquine, LVV: large vessel vasculitis, MMF: mycophenolate mofetil, MTX: methotrexate, N/A: not applicable, PMR: polymyalgia rheumatica, PMR-AS: PMR-activity score, SSZ: sulfasalazine, TCZ: tocilizumab.

Disclosure of Interests:

Dario Camellino Speakers bureau: Medac, Eli Lilly, Paid instructor for: Mylan, Consultant of: Accord, Celgene, Novartis, Sanofi, Christian Dejaco Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly (<10.000€), Andrea Giusti Speakers bureau: UCB, Amgen, Kyowa Kirin, Abiogen Pharma, and Eli Lilly, Consultant of: EffRx, Abiogen Pharma, FRANCO MARTINI: None declared, Renzo Cosso: None declared, Giuseppe Girasole: None declared, Gerolamo Bianchi Speakers bureau: Amgen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Servier, Consultant of: Abbvie, Abiogen Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Medac

POS1105 EFFECTS OF CHOLECALCIFEROL AND CALCIFEDIOL IN OSTEOPOROTIC WOMEN WITH SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM DUE TO SEVERE VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY UNDERGOING ZOLEDRONIC ACID TREATMENT: A RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background:

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPTH) due to vitamin D deficiency impairs the bone mineral density (BMD) response to alendronate,1-2 but the optimal strategy for its correction in postmenopausal osteoporotic women (PMO) about to start zoledronic acid (ZOL) therapy is still unknown.

Objectives:

To evaluate the effects of cholecalciferol (D3) and calcifediol (25OHD) on serum 25-OH-vitamin D (s25OHD), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and BMD in PMO presenting with sHPTH due to vitamin D deficiency.

Methods:

PMO with s25OHD <20 ng/ml, sHPTH (PTH >65 pg/ml) and BMD T-score at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) or total hip (TH) < -2.5, or between -1 and -2.5 plus one vertebral/femoral fracture, were randomly assigned to receive a therapeutic dose of D3 (300.000 IU bolus) followed by 175 mcg/weekly of D3, or 175 mcg/weekly of 25OHD alone, 2 months before receiving a single intravenous infusion of ZOL (5 mg). BMD at the LS, FN and TH was assessed at baseline and after one year from ZOL. Serum calcium, PTH and s25OHD were measured at baseline, and 6- and 12-month after ZOL. Adverse and clinical events were ascertained by 3-and 9-month telephone interviews, and by 6- and 12-month clinical evaluation.

Results:

45 PMO (25OHD N=23, D3 N=22) were enrolled over one year and 32 subjects (mean age ±SD 75±10 years, range 51-91) completed the 1-year of treatment/follow-up (25OHD N=17, D3 N=15). Most PMO discontinued for protocol violation, while three deceased before study ending (25OHD N=1, D3 N=2) for reasons not related to the agents investigated. The baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. At baseline mean s25OHD (±SE) was 8±1 ng/ml in the 25OHD group and 8±1 ng/ml in the D3 group. The corresponding figures for PTH were 111±6 pg/ml (25OHD) and 117±5 pg/ml (D3). Mean s25OHD (±SE) increased in both groups at 6- and 12-month, being significantly greater in the 25OHD group (12-month, 56±2 ng/ml) compared to the D3 group (12-month, 34±2 ng/ml, P<.001) at both time points (Figure 1). PTH (mean ±SE) decreased in both groups, being significantly lower in the 25OHD group at 12-month (25OHD 46±6 pg/ml versus D3 70±6 pg/ml, P=.007), as shown in Figure 1. BMD at the LS, FN and TH increased in both groups (with significant increases versus baseline only at the FN) without significant differences between s25OHD and D3. In PMO receiving D3 serum calcium remained stable over time, while those receiving s25OHD demonstrated a significant increase of serum calcium, with 2 PMO presenting a value close to the upper limit of the reference range at 12-month. No patient reported incident fractures or adverse events.

Conclusion:

Calcifediol 175 mcg weekly appears more potent in improving s25OHD and decreasing PTH concentrations compared to cholecalciferol therapeutic dose (300’000 IU) plus 175 mcg weekly in PMO presenting with sHPTH due to severe vitamin D deficiency about to start ZOL therapy. Further studies are warranted to clarify implications on BMD improvements on the long-term of similar 25OHD and D3 regimens.

References:

[1]Barone A et al., J Am Geriatr Soc 2007.

[2]Kincse G et al., BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012.

Disclosure of Interests:

Giulia Botticella: None declared, Monica Pizzonia: None declared, Barbara Cossu: None declared, Roberta Bruno: None declared, Dario Camellino Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Eli Lilly, Medac, Mylan, Novartis, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work, Giuseppe Girasole Speakers bureau: Abiogen Pharma and Novartis, outside the submitted work, Andrea Giusti Speakers bureau: UCB, Amgen, Kyowa Kirin, Abiogen Pharma, and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work, Consultant of: EffRx and Abiogen Pharma, outside the submitted work, Mario Pedrazzoni: None declared, Simona Alexovits: None declared, Franco Pleitavino: None declared, Federico Santolini: None declared, Alessio Nencioni: None declared, Gerolamo Bianchi Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Abiogen Pharma, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Genzyme, and Servier, outside the submitted work.

AB0488 SPONDYLOARTHRITIS DISEASE BURDEN AS PERCEIVED BY PATIENTS: BASELINE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME DATA FROM THE ITALIAN PROSPECTIVE SIRENA STUDY

Background:

Previous studies have compared Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Spondyloarthritis (SpA); a recent one has found similarity in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and axial patients1.

Objectives:

To describe PROs at SpA diagnosis (new or confirmed), by type of SpA and by gender.

Methods:

SIRENA is an Italian, prospective Registry of SpA patients diagnosed according to ASAS criteria and naïve to any DMARDs. At inclusion, patients were classified as predominant axial (AxSpA) or mainly peripheral (pSpA). PROs showed in the Table 1 were collected and analysed descriptively.

Table 1.

PhGA and PROs at diagnosis*

AxSpA*pSpAAll(n=123)Women(n=64)Men(n=58)All(n=227)Women(n=109)Men(n=118)PhGA, n1156054222105117mean (SD)50.2 (28.6)54.8 (26.7)45.0 (30.1)45.4 (25.9)49.9 (25.6)41.3 (25.6)median (min, max)52.0 (0-100)62.0 (0-100)43.5 (0-100)48.5 (0-100)50.0 (1.0-100)40.0 (0-95.0)PtGA, n1125952209102107mean (SD)56.4 (27.8)61.5 (25.8)50.3 (29.2)50.3 (26.2)56.4 (23.1)44.5 (27.7)median (min, max)63.0 (0-100)70.0 (2.0-100)50.0 (0-100)50.0 (0-100)58.5 (7.0-100)47.0 (0-100)Pain VAS score, n1136052207101106mean (SD)56.7 (28.3)61.1 (26.6)50.6 (29.1)51.9 (26.8)57.4 (25.3)46.8 (27.3)median (min, max)60.0 (0-100)69.5 (2.0-100)50.0 (0-100)53.0 (0-100)61.0 (0-100)48.5 (0-100)Sleep VAS score, n1136052211103108mean (SD)55.3 (29.3)57.4 (29.5)52.3 (29.2)44.0 (30.1)50.4 (29.8)37.9 (29.2)median (min, max)59.0 (0-100)61.5 (0-100)53.0 (0-100)44.0 (0-100)53.0 (0-100)34.0 (0-100)BASFI, n11058511336568mean (SD)4.6 (2.8)5.2 (2.6)3.9 (2.8)3.5 (2.6)4.0 (2.6)3.1 (2.4)median (min, max)5.1 (0-9.7)5.8 (0-9.4)3.6 (0-9.6)2.9 (0-10.0)3.9 (0-10.0)2.45 (0-8.9)BASDAI, n11259521397069mean (SD)5.2 (2.4)5.8 (2.3)4.5 (2.3)5.2 (2.3)5.8 (2.1)4.6 (2.3)median (min, max)5.5 (0-9.3)6.2 (0-9.3)4.5 (0.3-9.2)5.5 (0.2-10.0)6.1 (1.0-10.0)4.8 (0.2-9.2)HAQ-DI score, n109585020399104mean (SD)0.9 (0.7)1.1 (0.7)0.6 (0.6)0.7 (0.7)0.9 (0.7)0.6 (0.6)median (min, max)0.8 (0.0-2.5)1.1 (0-2.5)0.5 (0-2.3)0.6 (0.0-2.8)0.8 (0-2.8)0.4 (0-2.6)WPAI% work time missed, n4919301074562mean (SD)7.3 (21.4)4.2 (9.5)9.2 (26.3)8.8 (24.7)8.6 (25.6)8.9 (24.3)median (min, max)0 (0-100)0 (0-35.1)0 (0-100)0 (0-100)0 (0-100)0 (0-100)% impairment at work, n6733341346173mean (SD)48.2 (31.9)58.5 (26.6)38.2 (33.7)39.7 (31.4)45.4 (30.9)34.9 (31.2)median (min, max)50.0 (0-100)60.0 (0-100)25.0 (0-100)40.0 (0-100)50.0 (0-100)30.0 (0-100)% overall work impairment, n4819291064561mean (SD)44.1 (33.0)52.4 (27.9)38.7 (35.3)40.1 (33.0)45.1 (33.1)36.4 (32.7)median (min, max)45.0 (0-100)60.0 (0-100)20.0 (0-100)40.0 (0-100)50.0 (0-100)30.0 (0-100)% activity impairment, n10053461839390mean (SD)56.7 (28.6)63.4 (23.9)48.0 (31.0)48.5 (30.3)55.3 (28.7)41.4 (30.4)median (min, max)60.0 (0-100)70.0 (0-100)50.0 (0-100)50.0 (0-100)60.0 (0-100)40.0 (0-100)

* The sum does not add up to the total because of some missing values.

Results:

From 23 sites, 123 AxSpA and 227 pSpA patients were analysed. Diagnosis was new in 58% of AxSpA and 77% of pSpA. 85.5% of the pSpA had PsA, while in AxSpA the most frequent type was Ankylosing Spondylitis (48.8%). Time from symptom onset to diagnosis was higher in AxSpA than in pSpA (median 36 vs 24 months, respectively). At inclusion, composite disease activity measures showed high disease activity for AxSpA (mean ASDAS-CRP 3.1) and moderate disease activity for pSpA (mean DAS28 3.6; mean DAPSA 22.5). AxSpA patients had numerically worse values than pSpA in all the PROs collected, except for BASDAI score that was similar (mean 5.2). For both AxSpA and pSpA, all PROs were worse in women than men, except for the % of work time missed. PtGA scores were higher than PhGA, in each group and gender.

Conclusion:

At diagnosis, SpA patients perceive a slightly higher disease burden than assessed by Physicians. For PROs other than BASDAI, AxSpA reported a worse impact than pSpA. Overall, women showed a higher disease impact than men.

References:

[1]Michelsen B. et al. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(4): e0123582.

Disclosure of Interests:

Rosario Foti Speakers bureau: Speaker bureau honoraria from Eli Lilly, Sanofi, MSD, Janssen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Roche, Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Eli Lilly, Sanofi, MSD, Janssen, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Roche, Gabriella Cardinale: None declared., Luisa Costa: None declared., Franco Franceschini: None declared., Francesco Ciccia Speakers bureau: Speaker bureau honoraria from AbbVie, Abiogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Roche, Celgene, Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Pfizer, Novartis, Celgene, Janssen, Roche, Antonio Marchesoni: None declared., Giuliana Guggino Speakers bureau: Speaker bureau honoraria from Celgene, Sandoz, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Pfizer, Celgene, Maurizio Rossini: None declared., Ennio Lubrano Di Scorpaniello: None declared., Bruno Frediani: None declared., Maria Sole Chimenti: None declared., Gerolamo Bianchi: None declared., Giuseppe Galfo: None declared., Silvia Marelli Employee of: Employee of Janssen-Cilag SpA Italy, Ennio Favalli Speakers bureau: Consulting fees and/or speaking engagements from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Galapagos, Sanofi-Genzyme, and UCB.

POS1447 LOW-INTENSITY PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS IMPROVE PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE IN A DOSE-DEPENDENT MANNER: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN OLDER ADULTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background:

Low-intensity pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) have been shown to improve gait parameters in frail older adults.1 Furthermore, the continuous exposure to PEMF (up to 1 year) have been demonstrated to produce progressive improvements in self-selected gait speed in older adults at risk of falling.2

Objectives:

To investigate the effects of two different treatment regimens of PEMF on physical performances in older adults presenting with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA) or severe osteoporosis (OP).

Methods:

Older adults presenting with RA, OA or OP, at increased risk of falls, evaluated in our Falls Prevention Clinic, were considered for a prospective observational study investigating the effects of PEMF on physical performances. PEMF were supplied by the THS 280 E device (THS-Therapeutic Solutions Srl, Milan, Italy). It provides a new therapeutic approach, named TEPS (Triple Energy Postural Stabilization), that represents an evolution of physical therapy.1,2 On the basis of the physician judgment, PEMF were administered following an intensive protocol, every 45 days (PEMF-45), or a standard validated protocol1,2, every 60 days (PEMF-60). All subjects were assessed at baseline and every 3 months with the following tests: 4 meters gait speed test [4MGS, seconds (sec)], timed up and go test (TUG, sec), chair stand test (CST, sec), short physical performance battery (SPPB, score), and hand grip strength (HGS) by hand dynamometer (Kg). Demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics, including pharmacological treatments and functional status were evaluated at baseline. Clinical and adverse events were assessed every 45 or 60 days after PEMF administration.

Results:

Overall, 94 patients were enrolled between January and December 2020. Of these, 43 subjects (N=33 PEMF-45, N=11 PEMF-60) with a valid 6-month follow-up assessment were considered for the current analysis. The two groups were comparable regarding the main baseline characteristics, and similar % of patients presented with RA, OA or OP. Mean age (±SE) was 78±7 in PEMF-45 and 77±7 in PEMF-60. As expected, all physical performance tests improved significantly from baseline to 6 months in both groups. Mean (±SE) 4MGS increased significantly more in PEMF-45 (from 3.24±0.12 sec to 2.83±0.18 sec) compared to PEMF-60 (from 3.22±0.21 sec to 3.02±0.30 sec, p=.018). Likewise, mean (±SE) CST improved more in PEMF-45 (from 12.4±0.9 sec to 8.7±0.4 sec) compared to PEMF-60 (from 11.1±1.5 sec to 9.8±0.7 sec, p=.002). No significant difference between groups was found for the other tests, although a trend toward better results in PEMF-45 was manifest: SPPB improved by 6.4% in PEMF-45 and by 3.0% in PEMF-60, and TUG decreased by 7.8% in PEMF-45 and by 6.1% in PEMF-60. During the 6 months observation period no adverse event was observed.

Conclusion:

Preliminary results of our ongoing prospective observational study suggest that a more frequent administration of PEMF produces greater improvements in some but not all physical performance parameters compared to a standard validated regimen1,2.

References:

[1]Giusti A et al., Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013. 2Giusti A et al., J Am Geriatr Soc 2014.

Disclosure of Interests:

Massimo Giovale: None declared, Giuseppina Tramontano: None declared, Rossana Galli: None declared, Simone Rando: None declared, Andrea Giusti Speakers bureau: UCB, Amgen, Kyowa Kirin, Abiogen Pharma, and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work, Consultant of: EffRx and Abiogen Pharma, outside the submitted work, Lorenzo Bandi: None declared, Francesca Russo: None declared, Stefano Rampoldi Employee of: THS Therapeutic Solutions SRL, Luigi Carlo Bottaro: None declared, Gerolamo Bianchi Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Abiogen Pharma, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Genzyme and Servier, outside the submitted work

SERCA2a stimulation by istaroxime improves intracellular Ca2+ handling and diastolic dysfunction in a model of diabetic cardiomyopathy

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by CVie Therapeutics Limited (Taipei, Taiwan) and Windtree Therapeutics (Warrington, USA)

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a multifactorial disease characterized by an early onset of diastolic dysfunction (DD) that precedes the development of systolic impairment. Mechanisms that can restore cardiac relaxation improving intracellular Ca2+ dynamics represent a promising therapeutic approach for cardiovascular diseases associated to DD. Istaroxime has the double property to accelerate Ca2+ uptake into sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) through the SR Ca2+ pump (SERCA2a) stimulation and to inhibit Na+/K+ ATPase (NKA). The project aims to characterize istaroxime effects at a concentration (100 nM) marginally affecting NKA, in order to highlight its effects dependent on the stimulation of SERCA2a in a model of mild diabetes.

Streptozotocin (STZ) treated diabetic rats were studied at 9 weeks after STZ injection in comparison to controls (CTR). Istaroxime effects were evaluated in vivo and in left ventricular (LV) preparations. STZ animals showed 1) marked DD not associated to cardiac fibrosis, 2) LV mass reduction associated to reduced LV cell dimension and T-tubules loss, 3) reduced LV SERCA2 protein level and activity and 4) slower SR Ca2+ uptake rate, 5) LV action potential (AP) prolongation and increased short-term variability (STV) of AP duration, 6) increased diastolic Ca2+, 7) unaltered SR Ca2+ content and stability in intact cells. Acute istaroxime infusion (0.11 mg/kg/min for 15 min) reduced DD in STZ rats. Accordingly, in STZ myocytes istaroxime (100 nM) stimulated SERCA2a activity and blunted STZ-induced abnormalities in LV Ca2+ dynamics. In CTR myocytes, istaroxime increased diastolic Ca2+ level due to NKA blockade albeit minimal, while its effects on SERCA2a were almost absent.

SERCA2a stimulation by istaroxime improved STZ-induced DD and intracellular Ca2+ handling anomalies. Thus, SERCA2a stimulation can be considered a promising therapeutic approach for DD treatment. Abstract Figure.

Beating vs Arrested Heart Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Long-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is a rare procedure generally considered at high risk of perioperative mortality and poor long-term outcomes. Surgical treatment can be performed with either an arrested heart (AH) or beating heart (BH) technique. Aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of isolated tricuspid surgery with two different approaches.

METHODS

The SUR-TRI study is a multicenter international retrospective study enrolling adult patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve procedures (n=406, 56±16 years; 56% female) at 13 international sites. AH and BH strategies were performed in 253 and 153 cases, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare groups.

RESULTS

After matching, 129 pairs were obtained and analyzed. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.2 vs 5.0% in the AH and BH groups, respectively (p=0.9). The rates of acute renal failure requiring replacement therapy (3 vs 10%, p=0.02) and stroke (0 vs 1.8%, p=0.08) were numerically higher in the AH group. The 6-year survival rate was 67±6 vs 78±5% in the AH and BH groups, respectively (p=0.18), while freedom from cardiac death was 75±5 vs 84±4% (p=0.21). The six-year composite cardiac endpoint of cardiac death and reoperation rate was 60±9 vs 86±5% (p=0.024) comparing AH-TV replacement and BH-TV repair groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated tricuspid valve surgery performed with a beating heart strategy is a safe option and resulted in a trend of increased long-term survival and freedom from reoperation when compared with the standard arrested heart technique. Patients undergoing beating heart valve repair had the best long-term outcome.

The novel Mechanical Ventilator Milano for the COVID-19 pandemic

This paper presents the Mechanical Ventilator Milano (MVM), a novel intensive therapy mechanical ventilator designed for rapid, large-scale, low-cost production for the COVID-19 pandemic. Free of moving mechanical parts and requiring only a source of compressed oxygen and medical air to operate, the MVM is designed to support the long-term invasive ventilation often required for COVID-19 patients and operates in pressure-regulated ventilation modes, which minimize the risk of furthering lung trauma. The MVM was extensively tested against ISO standards in the laboratory using a breathing simulator, with good agreement between input and measured breathing parameters and performing correctly in response to fault conditions and stability tests. The MVM has obtained Emergency Use Authorization by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in healthcare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic and Health Canada Medical Device Authorization for Importation or Sale, under Interim Order for Use in Relation to COVID-19. Following these certifications, mass production is ongoing and distribution is under way in several countries. The MVM was designed, tested, prepared for certification, and mass produced in the space of a few months by a unique collaboration of respiratory healthcare professionals and experimental physicists, working with industrial partners, and is an excellent ventilator candidate for this pandemic anywhere in the world.