Oncological Outcomes of Delayed Nephrectomy After Optimal Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the current era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the role and optimal timing of a nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the oncological outcomes of patients who responded to ICI-based treatments and were subsequently treated with a delayed nephrectomy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This national retrospective evaluation included 30 patients with mRCC who underwent a nephrectomy after a complete response (CR) or a major partial response (>80%) to ICI treatment at metastatic sites.

INTERVENTION

Partial or radical nephrectomy after a favorable response to ICI treatment.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and potential discontinuation of systemic treatment were assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

ICI-based treatments included ipilimumab-nivolumab (40%), ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (10%), and nivolumab (50%). A delayed nephrectomy was performed after a median ICI treatment duration of 10 mo. In 19 cases (63.3%), surgeons faced difficulties due to adhesions or inflammatory changes. A complete pathological response was observed in 16.7% of patients. After a median follow-up of 19.5 mo after nephrectomy, 76.7% of patients achieved DFS. At 1 yr, 66.7% of patients were free from systemic treatment. The PFS and OS rates were, respectively, 96.7% and 100% at 1 yr, and 78.3% and 86.1% at 2 yr. Patients with a CR at metastatic sites had a better prognosis than those with a major partial response, in terms of DFS (p = 0.022) and PFS (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite potentially challenging surgery, a delayed nephrectomy for patients who responded to ICI treatment provided promising oncological outcomes, and the majority of patients could discontinue systemic treatment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcome in patients who responded well to immunotherapy, and subsequently underwent kidney ablation surgery. Three-quarters of patients experienced no recurrence, and in most cases, medical treatment could be discontinued.

Chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest improvements in response to salvage chemotherapy (CT) after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several types of cancer. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge after ICI, compared with second-line chemotherapy without previous ICI in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC).

METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective study, we included all patients with la/mUC initiating second or third-line chemotherapy from January 2015 to June 2020. We compared patients treated with second-line chemotherapy without previous ICI (CT2) and patients treated with third-line chemotherapy after ICI (CT3). The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) in CT3 compared with CT2. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities.

RESULTS

Overall, 553 patients were included. ORRs were 31.0% (95% CI, 26.5 to 35.5) and 29.2% (95% CI, 21.9 to 36.6), respectively, in CT2 and CT3, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.62). In subgroup analyses, no differences in ORR were observed by Bellmunt risk group, type of chemotherapy (platinum or taxanes), duration of response to first-platinum-based chemotherapy (< or ≥ 12 months) or FGFR-status. Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.9 to 5.1) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.5) in CT2 and CT3, respectively, and grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 35.0% and 22.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This large multicentre retrospective study provides clinically relevant real-world data. Chemotherapy re-challenge after ICI in la/mUC achieves ORR and PFS comparable with those obtained in CT2 with an acceptable safety profile. These updated results offer more promising outcomes than historically reported with second-line chemotherapy data.

Circulating L-Arginine predicts the survival of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the systemic approach to cancer treatment. However, most patients receiving ICIs do not derive benefits. Therefore, it is crucial to identify reliable predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs. One important pathway in regulating immune cell reactivity is L-arginine (ARG) metabolism, essential to T-cell activation. We therefore aimed to evaluate the association between baseline plasma ARG levels and the clinical benefit of ICIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The correlation between ARG levels and clinical ICI activity was assessed by analyzing plasma samples obtained before treatment onset in two independent cohorts of patients with advanced cancer included in two institutional molecular profiling programs (BIP, NCT02534649, n = 77; PREMIS, NCT03984318, n = 296) and from patients in a phase 1 first-in-human study of budigalimab monotherapy (NCT03000257). Additionally, the correlation between ARG levels and ICI efficacy in preclinical settings was evaluated using a syngeneic mouse model of colorectal cancer responsive to ICIs. Using matched PBMC plasma samples, we analyzed the correlation between ARG levels and PBMC features through multiplexed flow cytometry analysis.

RESULTS

In both discovery and validation cohorts, low ARG levels at baseline (<42 μM) were significantly and independently associated with a worse clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Moreover, at the preclinical level, the tumor rejection rate was significantly higher in mice with high baseline ARG levels than in those with low ARG levels (85.7% versus 23.8%; P = 0.004). Finally, PBMC immunophenotyping showed that low ARG levels were significantly associated with increased PD-L1 expression in several immune cell subsets from the myeloid lineage.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that baseline ARG levels predict ICI response. Plasma ARG quantification may therefore represent an attractive biomarker to tailor novel therapeutic regimens targeting the ARG pathway in combination with ICIs.

Vasectomy and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Context

Previous reports have shown an association between vasectomy and prostate cancer (PCa). However, there exist significant discrepancies between studies and systematic reviews due to a lack of strong causal association and residual confounding factors such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening.

Objective

To assess the association between vasectomy and PCa, in both unadjusted and PSA screen-adjusted studies.

Evidence acquisition

We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in January 2022 for studies that analyzed the association between vasectomy and PCa.

Evidence synthesis

A total of 37 studies including 16 931 805 patients met our inclusion criteria. A pooled analysis from all studies showed a significant association between vasectomy and any-grade PCa (odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.37; p < 0.001; I² = 96%), localized PCa (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06–1.11; p < 0.00001; I² = 31%), or advanced PCa (OR 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02–1.13; p = 0.006; I² = 0%). The association with PCa remained significant when the analyses were restricted to studies with a low risk of bias (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.10; p = 0.02; I² = 48%) or cohort studies (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04–1.13; p < 0.0001; I² = 64%). Among studies adjusted for PSA screening, the association with localized PCa (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03–1.09; p < 0.001; I² = 0%) remained significant. Conversely, vasectomy was no longer associated with localized high-grade (p = 0.19), advanced (p = 0.22), and lethal (p = 0.42) PCa.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis found an association between vasectomy and any, mainly localized, PCa. However, the effect estimates of the association were increasingly close to null when examining studies of robust design and high quality. On exploratory analyses including studies, which adjusted for PSA screening, the association for aggressive and/or advanced PCa diminished.

Patient summary

In this study, we found an association between vasectomy and the risk of developing localized prostate cancer without being able to determine whether the procedure leads to a higher prostate cancer incidence.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pain in the MAGNITUDE study of niraparib (NIRA) with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations

5060

Background: Results from the international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 MAGNITUDE study demonstrated that NIRA + AAP improved radiographic progression-free survival, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and time to symptomatic progression, with manageable toxicity in pts with mCRPC and HRR alterations (9-gene panel). Here, we report HRQoL and pain in MAGNITUDE. Methods: Eligible pts with mCRPC and HRR alterations were randomized 1:1 to NIRA + AAP or placebo (PBO) + AAP orally daily in 28-day cycles. Pts had ECOG status ≤1 and a Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score ≤3 in prescreening. HRQoL assessments on day 1 of specified cycles included Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P) and BPI-SF. Changes from baseline were compared between treatment arms using repeated measures analysis. Proportional hazards regression models were used to compare time to deterioration (TTD) in worst pain intensity between arms. Results: Compliance for FACT-P and BPI-SF was > 80%. Most pts maintained low pain levels over time. Repeated measures analyses showed no clinically meaningful differences in pain over time or between arms. Median TTD in pain intensity was not reached in either arm. At the 25th percentile, there was a trend toward longer TTD in pain intensity with NIRA + AAP vs PBO + AAP (11.1 vs 10.1 mo; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61-1.24). HRQoL was maintained with NIRA + AAP, with no clinically meaningful differences in FACT-P total score over time or between arms. There was a trend toward greater worsening in early cycles on FACT-P physical wellbeing with NIRA + AAP vs PBO + AAP, driven by events within the known safety profile of NIRA + AAP (worsening of side effect bother, lack of energy, and nausea); however, overall, most pts reported minimal side effect burden (Table). Conclusions: In MAGNITUDE, most pts maintained low pain levels and positive HRQoL over time, with no clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms, further supporting the use of NIRA + AAP in pts with mCRPC and HRR alterations. Side effect burden was perceived as low in both arms. Although more pts on NIRA+AAP reported worsening side effects, the symptoms were generally perceived as mild. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641. [Table: see text]

Identification of super-exhausted T cells: A novel population predictive of response to immunotherapy

2596

Background: Given that most of cancer patients treated with anti-PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) do not derive benefit, there is a crucial need to identify reliable predictive biomarker of response. Besides PD-1, several key immune checkpoints, such as CTLA4, LAG3, TIM3 and TIGIT, are associated with a T cell exhausted phenotype and play a crucial role in leading to cancer immune evasion. The impact of simultaneous expression by T cells of distinct inhibitory receptors on outcome of patients treated with ICB is still unknown. Methods: We analyzed the tissue samples, collected before ICB initiation, from patients with solid tumors and included in an institutional molecular profiling program (NCT02534649). We used multiplexed-immunohistofluorescence with the following panel CD3/PD1/TIM3/LAG3/TIGIT/CTLA4, and performed immune cell characterization using multispectral images analysis. We then investigated the correlation between coexpression of T cell-associated exhaustion markers, clinical response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Four hundred thirty five patients were included in the analysis (NSCLC: n=207, 47.6%; sarcoma: n=42, 9.7%; urothelial: n=30, 6.9%; others: n=156, 35.9%). Digital pathology analysis allowed us to identify a population of “super-exhausted” T cells characterized by the co-expression of PD1, LAG3, TIGIT and TIM3 which was enriched in 125 cases (28.7%), and was significantly associated with better PFS (HR 1.60, CI95 1.26-2.04, p<0.001) and OS (HR 1.42, CI95 1.07-1.89, p=0.016) in the whole cohort. Patients with super-exhausted high tumors had higher objective response rate (38.4%) compared to super-exhausted low tumors (19.7%, p<0.001). The presence of super-exhausted T cells was significantly higher in responders (10%) versus non responders (4%, p<0.001). Correlation with better outcome was observed whatever the subgroup considered (NSCLC vs other tumors, CD8 T cells density and presence of tertiary lymphoid structure [TLS]). In multivariate analysis (n=372, 85.5%), increased tumor infiltration by super-exhausted T cells (>1 %) was significantly associated with better PFS (HR 0.61, CI95 0.46-0.81, p<0.001, Table) and OS (HR 0.68, CI95 0.48-0.97, p=0.033, Table). Conclusions: The presence of super-exhausted T cells may represent a new predictive biomarker of response to ICB and pave the way for the development of effective ICB combinations. Data from an independent validation cohort will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

How PET-CT is Changing the Management of Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer?: Comment la TEP-TDM Peut Modifier la Prise en Charge du Cancer de la Prostate Non Métastatique Résistant à la Castration ?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this narrative review conducted by the Prostate Cancer Committee of the French Association of Urology (CC-AFU) was to provide an update on the current evidence for the impact of PET/CT in the management of men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review is based on data available in the literature on PET/CT imaging for staging nmCRPC patients. A PubMed search and narrative review of the data were performed in March 2022. Only articles in French or English were considered.

RESULTS

Current guidelines recommend bone scan and CT scan as standard imaging modalities for staging and follow-up of patients with nmCRPC. Nearly one-third of asymptomatic patients with presumed nmCRPC ultimately have metastatic disease on conventional imaging. Increasing reports have shown that conventional imaging has limited accuracy in detecting metastatic disease in nmCRPC patients, leading to the development of next-generation imaging techniques. In a retrospective study, 18F-choline PET/CT detected distant metastases in 27/58 high-risk nmCRPC patients with prior negative conventional imaging. The implementation of radiolabeled ligands of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in staging strategy has resulted in metastasis detection in 45% to 98% of patients with presumptive nmCRPC on conventional imaging. Such an early diagnosis of metastatic CRPC may allow patients to be referred for metastasis-directed therapies (i.e. stereotactic body radiotherapy), aimed at prolonging the efficacy of systemic therapies and improving clinical outcomes. However, current data are not strong enough to recommend this strategy, which must be properly evaluated in clinical trials. Indeed, the use of molecular imaging may lead to inappropriate undertreatment if the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (darolutamide, enzalutamide, apalutamide), which prolong life, are not used in the subgroup of patients with high PSA velocity (PSA doubling time <10 months).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of PSMA-PET/CT in the staging strategy would result in a migration of disease stage to extra-pelvic, M1 disease in at least half of presumed nmCRPC patients. The unprecedented accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT may pave the way for a more personalized treatment strategy. However, no data yet support this strategy for all nmCRPC patients as no oncologic benefit of early detection of M1 disease or MDT has been demonstrated. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Gene-by-gene analysis in the MAGNITUDE study of niraparib (NIRA) with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations

5020

Background: NIRA + AAP significantly improved outcomes in pts with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations in the Phase 3 MAGNTUDE study. There is a paucity of data supporting use of PARP inhibitors in pts with HRR gene alterations other than BRCA1/2. We report on the efficacy of NIRA + AAP in pts with mCRPC and a qualifying single gene HRR alteration other than BRCA1/2. Methods: A pre-specified analysis was undertaken of the primary endpoint (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS] by BICR), secondary endpoints (time to cytotoxic chemotherapy [TCC], time to symptomatic progression [TSP], overall survival [OS]), as well as time to PSA progression (TPSA) and overall response rate (ORR) across 186 pts (91 randomized to NIRA + AAP, 95 to PBO + AAP) with an alteration in the ATM, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, or PALB2 gene (excluding cooccurring alterations) . This analysis of individual alterations was not powered for formal statistical inference. Given the rarity of some alterations, groups based on functional similarity are also presented. Results: (Table). Pts with PALB2 or CHEK2 alterations had consistent improvement across all endpoints. In pts with ATM alterations benefit was observed in TCC, TSP, TPSA and ORR. There was benefit only in TPSA and ORR for pts with CDK12 alterations. When combined into functional groups, pts with an alteration in the HRR-Fanconi pathway ( BRIP1, FANCA, and PALB2) as well as pts with a HRR associated alteration ( CHEK2 or HDAC2) showed improvement in all endpoints. Conclusions: These data support the overall conclusions of the MAGNITUDE primary analysis and support benefit of NIRA + AAP in pts with HRR mutations beyond BRCA1/2. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641. [Table: see text]

Narrative review of PET/CT performances at biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and impact on patient disease management: Revue narrative à propos des performances de la TEP/TDM en cas de récidive biochimique après prostatectomie radicale dans le cancer de la prostate et impact sur la prise en charge des patients

Patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) may experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) in approximately 30% of cases. Recently, advances in imaging modalities and in particular Positron-Emission Tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging allow for better detection and characterization of lesions outside the prostatic bed at recurrence. Thus, treatment at BCR can be significantly improved by a tailored strategy based on new generation imaging. A more precise and accurate staging of the disease at recurrence paves the way to more appropriate treatment, potentially translating into better survival outcomes of these patients. This review therefore highlights the interest of PET/CT at the time of BCR, its superiority over standard imaging in terms of staging, and its impact on guiding the different therapeutic possibilities depending on the site, number, and volumes of recurrence. Indeed, we will discuss below about different strategies and their indications: salvage radiotherapy of the prostate bed, systemic therapies, stereotactic body radiotherapy and others therapeutical strategies. The various innovative approaches based on PET/CT implementation are partly underway within protocol trials to prove their benefits on clinically meaningful endpoints. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Impact of acetaminophen on the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with cancer

12000

Background: Pain is the most common symptom experienced by patients with advanced cancer. Acetaminophen (APAP, commonly known as paracetamol) alone or in combination with a weak opioid, such as codeine or tramadol, is usually considered as the first-line strategy to manage mild-to-moderate pain in this setting. Although generally considered to be safe, several evidences suggest that APAP may have negative immunomodulatory effects. Randomized studies have shown that APAP use is associated with blunted vaccine immune responses. Given its potential to impair vaccine effectiveness, the World Health Organization stated in 2015 that administration of APAP before or at the time of vaccination is not recommended. This study aimed to assess APAP impact on efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with cancer. Methods: Exposure to APAP was assessed by plasma analysis and was correlated with clinical outcome in three independent cohorts of patients with advanced cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB): the CheckMate 025 trial, n = 297 (NCT01668784, sponsor: Bristol Myers Squibb), the institutional biomarker program BIP n = 34 (NCT02534649, sponsor: Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) and the institutional biomarker program PREMIS n = 297 (NCT03984318, sponsor: Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France). APAP immunomodulatory effects were evaluated on a pre-clinical tumor model (MC38) and on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors. Results: Detectable plasma APAP levels at treatment onset was associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in ICB-treated cancer patients (HR for progression-free survival : 1.43, 95% CI 1.07–1.91, p = 0.015; HR for overall survival: 1.78 95% CI 1.18–2.68, p = 0.006), independently of other prognostic factors (age, performance status, number of previous lines of treatment, tumor type, number of metastatic sites, presence of liver metastases, LDH levels). APAP significantly reduced ICB efficacy in the pre-clinical MC38 model, as well as the production of PD1 blockade-related interferon-γ secretion by human PBMCs. Moreover, reduction of ICB efficacy in vivo was associated with significantly increased tumor infiltration by regulatory T cells (Tregs). Administration of APAP over 24 h induced a significant expansion of peripheral Tregs in healthy individuals. In addition, interleukin-10, a crucial mediator of Treg-induced immune suppression, was significantly upregulated upon treatment with ICB in cancer patients taking APAP. Conclusions: This study provides strong pre-clinical and clinical evidence of the role of APAP as a potential suppressor of antitumor immunity. Hence, APAP should be used with caution in patients treated with ICB.

Impact of acetaminophen on the efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Acetaminophen (APAP) use has been associated with blunted vaccine immune responses. This study aimed to assess APAP impact on immunotherapy efficacy in patients with cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Exposure to APAP was assessed by plasma analysis and was correlated with clinical outcome in three independent cohorts of patients with advanced cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). APAP immunomodulatory effects were evaluated on a pre-clinical tumor model and on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors.

RESULTS

Detectable plasma APAP levels at treatment onset was associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in ICB-treated cancer patients, independently of other prognostic factors. APAP significantly reduced ICB efficacy in the pre-clinical MC38 model, as well as the production of PD1 blockade-related interferon-γ secretion by human PBMCs. Moreover, reduction of ICB efficacy in vivo was associated with significantly increased tumor infiltration by regulatory T cells (Tregs). Administration of APAP over 24 h induced a significant expansion of peripheral Tregs in healthy individuals. In addition, interleukin-10, a crucial mediator of Treg-induced immune suppression, was significantly upregulated upon treatment with ICB in cancer patients taking APAP.

CONCLUSION

This study provides strong pre-clinical and clinical evidence of the role of APAP as a potential suppressor of antitumor immunity. Hence, APAP should be used with caution in patients treated with ICB.

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT)-positive mediastinal lymphadenopathies in patients with thoracic or extra-thoracic malignancies

BACKGROUND

The high sensitivity of PET-CT can identify hypermetabolic mediastinal adenopathies during cancer management, but specificity is low and a biopsy is sometimes required to eliminate benign adenopathies.

METHODS

This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included patients with hypermetabolic mediastinal lymphadenopathies revealed on PET-CT during either the initial management of a cancer, treatment evaluation, or monitoring. All patients underwent EUS-FNA. Diagnoses of malignancy based on cytological analysis following EUS-FNA were compared with clinical and radiological follow-up information. The treatment strategy decided before the results of the EUS-FNA pathology reports (Multidisciplinary Team Meeting [MTM-1]) was recorded and compared to the treatment strategy decided once pathological data from EUS-FNA were available (MTM-2).

MAIN FINDINGS

Between 2013 and 2018, 75 patients were included with 47 eligible and evaluable patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EUS-FNA were 93%, 100%, 100% and 90%, respectively. The concordance value between the therapeutic strategies determined for MTM-1 and MTM-2 was 44.7%. There were no significant differences in the intensity of fixation on PET-CT between malignant and benign lesions.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of the minimally invasive EUS-FNA procedure is sufficiently robust to avoid the need for diagnostic surgery. The combination of PET-CT and EUS-FNA may alter the therapeutic strategy that would be considered after PET-CT alone.

REGISTRATION

NCT01892501.

Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design

BACKGROUND

Current standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer supplements androgen deprivation therapy with either docetaxel, second-generation hormonal therapy, or radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abiraterone plus prednisone, with or without radiotherapy, in addition to standard of care.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design (PEACE-1) at 77 hospitals across Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Romania, Spain, and Switzerland. Eligible patients were male, aged 18 years or older, with histologically confirmed or cytologically confirmed de novo metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (or 2 due to bone pain). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to standard of care (androgen deprivation therapy alone or with intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m² once every 3 weeks), standard of care plus radiotherapy, standard of care plus abiraterone (oral 1000 mg abiraterone once daily plus oral 5 mg prednisone twice daily), or standard of care plus radiotherapy plus abiraterone. Neither the investigators nor the patients were masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival. Abiraterone efficacy was first assessed in the overall population and then in the population who received androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel as standard of care (population of interest). This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01957436.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 27, 2013, and Dec 20, 2018, 1173 patients were enrolled (one patient subsequently withdrew consent for analysis of his data) and assigned to receive standard of care (n=296), standard of care plus radiotherapy (n=293), standard of care plus abiraterone (n=292), or standard of care plus radiotherapy plus abiraterone (n=291). Median follow-up was 3·5 years (IQR 2·8-4·6) for radiographic progression-free survival and 4·4 years (3·5-5·4) for overall survival. Adjusted Cox regression modelling revealed no interaction between abiraterone and radiotherapy, enabling the pooled analysis of abiraterone efficacy. In the overall population, patients assigned to receive abiraterone (n=583) had longer radiographic progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·54, 99·9% CI 0·41-0·71; p<0·0001) and overall survival (0·82, 95·1% CI 0·69-0·98; p=0·030) than patients who did not receive abiraterone (n=589). In the androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel population (n=355 in both with abiraterone and without abiraterone groups), the HRs were consistent (radiographic progression-free survival 0·50, 99·9% CI 0·34-0·71; p<0·0001; overall survival 0·75, 95·1% CI 0·59-0·95; p=0·017). In the androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel population, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 217 (63%) of 347 patients who received abiraterone and 181 (52%) of 350 who did not; hypertension had the largest difference in occurrence (76 [22%] patients and 45 [13%], respectively). Addition of abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy plus docetaxel did not increase the rates of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, or neuropathy compared with androgen deprivation therapy plus docetaxel alone.

INTERPRETATION

Combining androgen deprivation therapy, docetaxel, and abiraterone in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival with a modest increase in toxicity, mostly hypertension. This triplet therapy could become a standard of care for these patients.

FUNDING

Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Sanofi, and the French Government.

PARP Inhibitors as Monotherapy in Daily Practice for Advanced Prostate Cancers

Despite recent improvements in survival, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPCs) remain lethal. Alterations in genes involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway are associated with poor prognosis. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have demonstrated anti-tumoral effects by synthetic lethality in patients with mCRPCs harboring HRR gene alterations, in particular BRCA2. While both olaparib and rucaparib have obtained government approvals for use, the selection of eligible patients as well as the prescription of these treatments within the clinical urology community are challenging. This review proposes a brief review of the rationale and outcomes of PARPi treatment, then a pragmatic vision of PARPi use in terms of prescription and the selection of patients based on molecular screening, which can involve potential genetic counseling in the case of associated germinal alterations.

Pain and health-related quality of life with olaparib versus physician's choice of next-generation hormonal drug in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair gene alterations (PROfound): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The PROfound study showed significantly improved radiographical progression-free survival and overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with alterations in homologous recombination repair genes and disease progression on a previous next-generation hormonal drug who received olaparib then those who received control. We aimed to assess pain and patient-centric health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in patients in the trial.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 study, patients (aged ≥18 years) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and gene alterations to one of 15 genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM [cohort A] and BRIP1, BARD1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, and RAD54L [cohort B]) and disease progression after a previous next-generation hormonal drug were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg orally twice daily) or a control drug (enzalutamide tablets [160 mg orally once daily] or abiraterone tablets [1000 mg orally once daily] plus prednisone tablets [5 mg orally twice daily]), stratified by previous taxane use and measurable disease. The primary endpoint (radiographical progression-free survival in cohort A) has been previously reported. The prespecified secondary endpoints reported here are on pain, HRQOL, symptomatic skeletal-related events, and time to first opiate use for cancer-related pain in cohort A. Pain was assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, and HRQOL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P). All endpoints were analysed in patients in cohort A by modified intention-to-treat. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02987543.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 6, 2017, and June 4, 2019, 245 patients were enrolled in cohort A and received study treatment (162 [66%] in the olaparib group and 83 [34%] in the control group). Median duration of follow-up at data cutoff in all patients was 6·2 months (IQR 2·2-10·4) for the olaparib group and 3·5 months (1·7-4·9) for the control group. In cohort A, median time to pain progression was significantly longer with olaparib than with control (median not reached [95% CI not reached-not reached] with olaparib vs 9·92 months [5·39-not reached] with control; HR 0·44 [95% CI 0·22-0·91]; p=0·019). Pain interference scores were also better in the olaparib group (difference in overall adjusted mean change from baseline score -0·85 [95% CI -1·31 to -0·39]; pnominal=0·0004). Median time to progression of pain severity was not reached in either group (95% CI not reached-not reached for both groups; HR 0·56 [95% CI 0·25-1·34]; pnominal=0·17). In patients who had not used opiates at baseline (113 in the olaparib group, 58 in the control group), median time to first opiate use for cancer-related pain was 18·0 months (95% CI 12·8-not reached) in the olaparib group versus 7·5 months (3·2-not reached) in the control group (HR 0·61; 95% CI 0·38-0·99; pnominal=0·044). The proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvement in FACT-P total score during treatment was higher for the olaparib group than the control group: 15 (10%) of 152 evaluable patients had a response in the olaparib group compared with one (1%) of evaluable 77 patients in the control group (odds ratio 8·32 [95% CI 1·64-151·84]; pnominal=0·0065). Median time to first symptomatic skeletal-related event was not reached for either treatment group (olaparib group 95% CI not reached-not reached; control group 7·8-not reached; HR 0·37 [95% CI 0·20-0·70]; pnominal=0·0013).

INTERPRETATION

Olaparib was associated with reduced pain burden and better-preserved HRQOL compared with the two control drugs in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and homologous recombination repair gene alterations who had disease progression after a previous next-generation hormonal drug. Our findings support the clinical benefit of improved radiographical progression-free survival and overall survival identified in PROfound.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Bone mineral density in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with or without abiraterone plus prednisone in the PEACE-1 phase 3 trial

19

Background: Addition of abiraterone plus prednisone (AAP) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) improved overall survival in men with de novo metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer in PEACE-1 trial. An analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) was planned by an amendment in the last randomized patients to assess whether addition of AAP increases bone loss. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomized to receive either ADT + D + AAP or ADT + D (and also randomized for radiotherapy given to the prostate). BMD (g/cm2) of the lumbar spine (L), femoral neck (F) and total hip (H) were measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline, M6, M12 and M24 in both arms. Mean percent change in BMD values from baseline to the different time points were calculated. T-Scores were also assessed. Results: Among the 210 pts with BMD data, 182 (87%) had available data at baseline, 109 (52%) at M6, 94 (45%) at M12, and 109 (52%) at M24: 97 pts were treated with AAP and 98 without. In both arms, the median age was 65 years and 69 pts (71%) were ECOG PS 0. Median body mass index (BMI) was 25.6 and 26.5 kg/m2 in pts treated with or without AAP, respectively. BMD, T score and mean percent change in BMD values are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: This is the first prospective assessment of BMD in a randomized trial, according to an experimental treatment with AAP. Despite a bone loss increase in both arms over time, addition of AAP to ADT+D was associated with no or modest difference in bone loss during the first 2 years, compared to ADT+D. Data including fractures will be presented. Main limitations include the difficulty to reliably assess BMD in men with bone metastases, the limited sample size and the short follow-up (i.e. 2 years). Clinical trial information: NCT01957436. [Table: see text]

Phase 3 MAGNITUDE study: First results of niraparib (NIRA) with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with and without homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations

12

Background: Approximately 20% of mCRPC has alterations in genes associated with HRR and is responsive to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) such as NIRA. Combined PARPi with androgen receptor pathway targeting may also benefit unselected mCRPC. MAGNITUDE assessed whether adding NIRA to AAP improves outcomes in pts with mCRPC with or without alterations in HRR associated genes. Methods: MAGNITUDE (NCT03748641) is a randomized, double-blind phase 3 study. In eligible mCRPC pts, ≤4 mos of prior AAP for mCRPC was allowed. Pts with (HRR biomarker [BM]+; ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, PALB2) and without specified gene alterations (HRR BM-) were randomized 1:1 to receive NIRA 200 mg once daily + AAP or placebo (PBO) + AAP. Primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the BRCA1/2 group followed by all HRR BM+ pts. Secondary endpoints were time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTCC), time to symptomatic progression (TTSP) and overall survival (OS). Other endpoints included time to PSA progression (TTPP) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: 423 HRR BM+ pts were randomized to NIRA + AAP (n = 212) or PBO + AAP (n = 211). Median age was 69, 23% had prior AAP, 21% had visceral metastases, and 53% had BRCA1/2 mutations. Median follow-up was 18.6 mos. NIRA + AAP significantly improved rPFS by BICR in the BRCA1/2 subgroup and in all HRR BM+ pts, reducing the risk of progression or death by 47% (16.6 vs 10.9 mo) and 27% (16.5 vs 13.7 mo) respectively (Table), vs PBO + AAP. Investigator assessed rPFS was consistent with BICR. NIRA + AAP delayed TTCC, TTSP, and TTPP and improved ORR in HRR BM+ pts (Table). First interim analysis of OS is immature. The preplanned futility analysis in 233 HRR BM- pts showed no benefit of adding NIRA to AAP in the prespecified composite endpoint (first of PSA progression or rPFS; HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.75-1.57). No new safety signals were seen. In HRR BM+ pts, 67% and 46.4% had grade 3/4 AEs and 9% and 3.8% discontinued treatment in the NIRA + AAP and PBO + AAP arms, respectively. There were no clinically significant differences in overall quality of life (FACT-P). Conclusions: NIRA + AAP improves rPFS and other clinically relevant outcomes in pts with mCRPC and alterations in HRR associated genes. There was no evidence of benefit with the addition of NIRA to AAP in HRR BM- pts with mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641. [Table: see text]

CIMUC: Chemotherapy following Immune checkpoints inhibitors in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC)

492

Background: Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) have recently changed therapeutic landscape of la/mUC. Recent studies suggested an improvement of response to salvage chemotherapy (CT) after ICIs in several cancer types including urothelial carcinoma. We assumed that efficacy of CT rechallenge after ICIs may be improved compared to second-line CT without previous ICIs in patients (pts) with la/mUC. Methods: CIMUC is a French multicentric retrospective study including all pts with la/mUC initiating second or third-line CT from January 1st 2015 to June 30th 2020. Two groups of pts were defined: pts in group 1 (G1) were treated with a second-line CT without previous ICIs; pts in group 2 (G2) were treated with third line CT after ICIs. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR: proportion of patients with complete or partial response, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria) in G2 versus G1. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from initiation of second or third-line CT to disease progression or death from any cause, and toxicities. This study is supported by the French Genito Urinary Group (GETUG). Results: 553 pts were included. Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups are summarized in the Table. ORRs were 31% (95%CI [26.5-35.5]) and 29.2% (95%CI [21.9-36.6]) respectively in G1 and G2, without statistically significant difference (p=0.617), even after adjustment for Bellmunt risk factors (p=0.3214). In subgroups analysis, no difference in ORR was observed by type of CT (platinum or taxanes), duration of response (DOR) to first-platinum-based CT (< 12 months or ≥ 12 months) and FGFR-status. We did not identify any predictive factor of OR in G2 in multivariate analysis. Median PFS were 4.6 months (95%CI [3.88; 5.06]) and 4.86 months (95%CI [4.11; 5.45]), respectively in G1 and G2. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 35% and 22.4%, respectively in G1 and G2. Conclusions: While ORR was not superior in G2 versus G1, pts derive comparable benefit in a further line of treatment (G2) in terms of ORR and PFS. Despite limits inherent to any retrospective study, CIMUC represents one of the largest retrospective studies in this setting.[Table: see text]