26
|
Biewer TM, Meitner S, Rapp J, Ray H, Shaw G. First results from the Thomson scattering diagnostic on proto-MPEX. THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 2016; 87:11E518. [PMID: 27910678 DOI: 10.1063/1.4959163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
A Thomson scattering (TS) diagnostic has been successfully implemented on the prototype Material Plasma Exposure eXperiment (Proto-MPEX) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The diagnostic collects the light scattered by plasma electrons and spectroscopically resolves the Doppler shift imparted to the light by the velocity of the electrons. The spread in velocities is proportional to the electron temperature, while the total number of photons is proportional to the electron density. TS is a technique used on many devices to measure the electron temperature (Te) and electron density (ne) of the plasma. A challenging aspect of the technique is to discriminate the small number of Thomson scattered photons against the large peak of background photons from the high-power laser used to probe the plasma. A variety of methods are used to mitigate the background photons in Proto-MPEX, including Brewster angled windows, viewing dumps, and light baffles. With these methods, first results were measured from argon plasmas in Proto-MPEX, indicating Te ∼ 2 eV and ne ∼ 1 × 1019 m-3. The configuration of the Proto-MPEX TS diagnostic will be described and plans for improvement will be given.
Collapse
|
27
|
Wolcott J, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bercellie A, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Cai T, Carneiro MF, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Devan J, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Endress E, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Galindo R, Gallagher H, Golan T, Gran R, Harris DA, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Kiveni M, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, Martinez Caicedo DA, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Mousseau J, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Osta J, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Rakotondravohitra L, Ramirez MA, Ray H, Ren L, Rimal D, Rodrigues PA, Ruterbories D, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Solano Salinas CJ, Sánchez Falero S, Tagg N, Tice BG, Valencia E, Walton T, Wospakrik M, Zhang D. Evidence for Neutral-Current Diffractive π^{0} Production from Hydrogen in Neutrino Interactions on Hydrocarbon. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2016; 117:111801. [PMID: 27661679 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.111801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The MINERvA experiment observes an excess of events containing electromagnetic showers relative to the expectation from Monte Carlo simulations in neutral-current neutrino interactions with mean beam energy of 4.5 GeV on a hydrocarbon target. The excess is characterized and found to be consistent with neutral-current π^{0} production with a broad energy distribution peaking at 7 GeV and a total cross section of 0.26±0.02(stat.)±0.08(sys.)×10^{-39} cm^{2}. The angular distribution, electromagnetic shower energy, and spatial distribution of the energy depositions of the excess are consistent with expectations from neutrino neutral-current diffractive π^{0} production from hydrogen in the hydrocarbon target. These data comprise the first direct experimental observation and constraint for a reaction that poses an important background process in neutrino-oscillation experiments searching for ν_{μ} to ν_{e} oscillations.
Collapse
|
28
|
Wang Z, Marshall CM, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bellantoni L, Bercellie A, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Cai T, Carneiro MF, da Motta H, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Endress E, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Galindo R, Gallagher H, Ghosh A, Golan T, Gran R, Harris DA, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Kiveni M, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Martinez Caicedo DA, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Mousseau J, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Rakotondravohitra L, Ramirez MA, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rimal D, Rodrigues PA, Ruterbories D, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Simon C, Solano Salinas CJ, Tice BG, Valencia E, Walton T, Wolcott J, Wospakrik M, Zavala G, Zhang D. Evidence of Coherent K^{+} Meson Production in Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2016; 117:061802. [PMID: 27541459 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.061802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Neutrino-induced charged-current coherent kaon production ν_{μ}A→μ^{-}K^{+}A is a rare, inelastic electroweak process that brings a K^{+} on shell and leaves the target nucleus intact in its ground state. This process is significantly lower in rate than the neutrino-induced charged-current coherent pion production because of Cabibbo suppression and a kinematic suppression due to the larger kaon mass. We search for such events in the scintillator tracker of MINERvA by observing the final state K^{+}, μ^{-}, and no other detector activity, and by using the kinematics of the final state particles to reconstruct the small momentum transfer to the nucleus, which is a model-independent characteristic of coherent scattering. We find the first experimental evidence for the process at 3σ significance.
Collapse
|
29
|
Marshall C, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bellantoni L, Bercellie A, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Cai T, Carneiro M, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Devan J, Dytman S, Díaz G, Eberly B, Endress E, Felix J, Fields L, Filkins A, Fine R, Gago A, Galindo R, Gallagher H, Ghosh A, Golan T, Gran R, Griswold S, Harris D, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Kiveni M, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Maher E, Majoros I, Manly S, Mann W, Martinez Caicedo D, McFarland K, McGivern C, McGowan A, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín J, Mousseau J, Naples D, Nelson J, Norrick A, Nuruzzaman, Osta J, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick C, Perdue G, Rakotondravohitra L, Ramirez M, Ransome R, Ray H, Ren L, Rimal D, Rodrigues P, Rosenberg M, Ruterbories D, Schellman H, Schmitz D, Shadler L, Simon C, Solano Salinas C, Sánchez S, Tice B, Valencia E, Walton T, Wang Z, Watkins P, Wiley K, Wolcott J, Wospakrik M, Zhang D. Measurement ofK+production in charged-currentνμinteractions. Int J Clin Exp Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.012002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
30
|
Park J, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bellantoni L, Bercellie A, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Cai T, Carneiro M, Christy M, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Dytman S, Díaz G, Eberly B, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Gago A, Galindo R, Ghosh A, Golan T, Gran R, Harris D, Higuera A, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Maher E, Manly S, Mann W, Marshall C, Martinez Caicedo D, McFarland K, McGivern C, McGowan A, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín J, Mousseau J, Naples D, Nelson J, Norrick A, Nuruzzaman, Osta J, Paolone V, Patrick C, Perdue G, Rakotondravohitra L, Ramirez M, Ray H, Ren L, Rimal D, Rodrigues P, Ruterbories D, Schellman H, Solano Salinas C, Tagg N, Tice B, Valencia E, Walton T, Wolcott J, Wospakrik M, Zavala G, Zhang D. Measurement of neutrino flux from neutrino-electron elastic scattering. Int J Clin Exp Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.93.112007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
31
|
Wolcott J, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bellantoni L, Bercellie A, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Cai T, Carneiro MF, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Devan J, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Gago AM, Galindo R, Gallagher H, Ghosh A, Golan T, Gran R, Harris DA, Higuera A, Kiveni M, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, Martinez Caicedo DA, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Mousseau J, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Osta J, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Rakotondravohitra L, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rimal D, Rodrigues PA, Ruterbories D, Salazar G, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Tice BG, Valencia E, Walton T, Wospakrik M, Zavala G, Zegarra A, Zhang D, Ziemer BP. Measurement of Electron Neutrino Quasielastic and Quasielasticlike Scattering on Hydrocarbon at ⟨E_{ν}⟩=3.6 GeV. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2016; 116:081802. [PMID: 26967410 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.081802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The first direct measurement of electron neutrino quasielastic and quasielasticlike scattering on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region of incident neutrino energy has been carried out using the MINERvA detector in the NuMI beam at Fermilab. The flux-integrated differential cross sections in the electron production angle, electron energy, and Q^{2} are presented. The ratio of the quasielastic, flux-integrated differential cross section in Q^{2} for ν_{e} with that of similarly selected ν_{μ}-induced events from the same exposure is used to probe assumptions that underpin conventional treatments of charged-current ν_{e} interactions used by long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments. The data are found to be consistent with lepton universality and are well described by the predictions of the neutrino event generator GENIE.
Collapse
|
32
|
Rodrigues PA, Demgen J, Miltenberger E, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bellantoni L, Bercellie A, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Cai T, Carneiro MF, Chvojka J, Devan J, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Elkins M, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Gago AM, Galindo R, Gallagher H, Ghosh A, Golan T, Gran R, Harris DA, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Kiveni M, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Leistico JR, Lovlein A, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, Martinez Caicedo DA, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Mousseau J, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Osta J, Paolone V, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Ramirez MA, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rimal D, Ruterbories D, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Tice BG, Valencia E, Walton T, Wolcott J, Wospakrik M, Zavala G, Zhang D. Identification of Nuclear Effects in Neutrino-Carbon Interactions at Low Three-Momentum Transfer. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2016; 116:071802. [PMID: 26943528 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.071802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Two different nuclear-medium effects are isolated using a low three-momentum transfer subsample of neutrino-carbon scattering data from the MINERvA neutrino experiment. The observed hadronic energy in charged-current ν_{μ} interactions is combined with muon kinematics to permit separation of the quasielastic and Δ(1232) resonance processes. First, we observe a small cross section at very low energy transfer that matches the expected screening effect of long-range nucleon correlations. Second, additions to the event rate in the kinematic region between the quasielastic and Δ resonance processes are needed to describe the data. The data in this kinematic region also have an enhanced population of multiproton final states. Contributions predicted for scattering from a nucleon pair have both properties; the model tested in this analysis is a significant improvement but does not fully describe the data. We present the results as a double-differential cross section to enable further investigation of nuclear models. Improved description of the effects of the nuclear environment are required by current and future neutrino oscillation experiments.
Collapse
|
33
|
Eberly B, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Barrios Sazo M, Bellantoni L, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Bustamante M, Butkevich A, Martinez Caicedo D, Carneiro M, Christy M, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Datta M, Devan J, Díaz G, Dytman S, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Fiorentini G, Gago A, Galindo R, Gallagher H, Golan T, Gran R, Harris D, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Kafka T, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Maher E, Manly S, Mann W, Marshall C, McFarland K, McGivern C, McGowan A, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín J, Mousseau J, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson J, Norrick A, Osta J, Palomino J, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick C, Perdue G, Rakotondravohitra L, Ramirez M, Ransome R, Ray H, Ren L, Rodrigues P, Ruterbories D, Salazar G, Schellman H, Schmitz D, Simon C, Sobczyk J, Solano Salinas C, Tagg N, Tice B, Valencia E, Walton T, Wolcott J, Wospakrik M, Zavala G, Zegarra A, Zhang D, Ziemer B. Charged pion production inνμinteractions on hydrocarbon at⟨Eν⟩=4.0 GeV. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.92.092008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
34
|
Walton T, Betancourt M, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bodek A, Bravar A, Budd H, Bustamante M, Butkevich A, Martinez Caicedo D, Carneiro M, Castromonte C, Christy M, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Datta M, Devan J, Dytman S, Díaz G, Eberly B, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Fiorentini G, Gago A, Gallagher H, Gran R, Harris D, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Kulagin S, Le T, Maher E, Manly S, Mann W, Marshall C, Martin Mari C, McFarland K, McGivern C, McGowan A, Messerly B, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín J, Mousseau J, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson J, Norrick A, Osta J, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick C, Perdue G, Rakotondravohitra L, Ransome R, Ray H, Ren L, Rodrigues P, Ruterbories D, Schellman H, Schmitz D, Simon C, Snider F, Sobczyk J, Solano Salinas C, Tagg N, Tice B, Valencia E, Wolcott J, Wospakrik M, Zavala G, Zhang D, Ziemer B. Measurement of muon plus proton final states inνμinteractions on hydrocarbon at⟨Eν⟩=4.2 GeV. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.91.071301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
35
|
Aguilar-Arevalo A, Brown B, Bugel L, Cheng G, Church E, Conrad J, Dharmapalan R, Djurcic Z, Finley D, Ford R, Garcia F, Garvey G, Grange J, Huelsnitz W, Ignarra C, Imlay R, Johnson R, Karagiorgi G, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Louis W, Mariani C, Marsh W, Mills G, Mirabal J, Moore C, Mousseau J, Nienaber P, Osmanov B, Pavlovic Z, Perevalov D, Polly C, Ray H, Roe B, Russell A, Shaevitz M, Spitz J, Stancu I, Tayloe R, Van de Water R, Wascko M, White D, Wickremasinghe D, Zeller G, Zimmerman E. Measurement of the antineutrino neutral-current elastic differential cross section. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.91.012004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
36
|
Higuera A, Mislivec A, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Bercellie A, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Brooks WK, Budd H, Butkevich A, Carneiro MF, Castromonte CM, Christy ME, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Devan J, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Felix J, Fields L, Fine R, Fiorentini GA, Gallagher H, Gomez A, Gran R, Harris DA, Hurtado K, Kleykamp J, Kordosky M, Le T, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, Martinez Caicedo DA, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Messerly B, Miller J, Morfín JG, Mousseau J, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Osta J, Palomino JL, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rodrigues PA, Ruterbories D, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Snider FD, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Tice BG, Valencia E, Walton T, Wolcott J, Wospakrik M, Zavala G, Zhang D, Ziemer BP. Measurement of coherent production of π(±) in neutrino and antineutrino beams on carbon from Eν of 1.5 to 20 GeV. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2014; 113:261802. [PMID: 25615308 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.113.261802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Neutrino-induced coherent charged pion production on nuclei νμA→μ(±)π(∓)A is a rare, inelastic interaction in which a small squared four-momentum |t| is transferred to the recoil nucleus, leaving it intact in the reaction. In the scintillator tracker of MINERvA, we remove events with evidence of particles from nuclear breakup and reconstruct |t| from the final-state pion and muon. We select low |t| events to isolate a sample rich in coherent candidates. By selecting low |t| events, we produce a model-independent measurement of the differential cross section for coherent scattering of neutrinos and antineutrinos on carbon. We find poor agreement with the predicted kinematics in neutrino generators used by current oscillation experiments.
Collapse
|
37
|
Tice BG, Datta M, Mousseau J, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Barrios Sazo MG, Betancourt M, Bodek A, Bravar A, Brooks WK, Budd H, Bustamante MJ, Butkevich A, Martinez Caicedo DA, Castromonte CM, Christy ME, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Devan J, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Felix J, Fields L, Fiorentini GA, Gago AM, Gallagher H, Gran R, Harris DA, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Jerkins M, Kafka T, Kordosky M, Kulagin SA, Le T, Maggi G, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, Martin Mari C, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Osta J, Palomino JL, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Rakotondravohitra L, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rodrigues PA, Savage DG, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Simon C, Snider FD, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Valencia E, Velásquez JP, Walton T, Wolcott J, Zavala G, Zhang D, Ziemer BP. Measurement of ratios of νμ charged-current cross sections on C, Fe, and Pb to CH at neutrino energies 2-20 GeV. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2014; 112:231801. [PMID: 24972195 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.231801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
We present measurements of ν(μ) charged-current cross section ratios on carbon, iron, and lead relative to a scintillator (CH) using the fine-grained MINERvA detector exposed to the NuMI neutrino beam at Fermilab. The measurements utilize events of energies 2<E(ν)<20 GeV, with ⟨E(ν)⟩ = 8 GeV, which have a reconstructed μ(-) scattering angle less than 17° to extract ratios of inclusive total cross sections as a function of neutrino energy E(ν) and flux-integrated differential cross sections with respect to the Bjorken scaling variable x. These results provide the first high-statistics direct measurements of nuclear effects in neutrino scattering using different targets in the same neutrino beam. Measured cross section ratios exhibit a relative depletion at low x and enhancement at large x. Both become more pronounced as the nucleon number of the target nucleus increases. The data are not reproduced by GENIE, a conventional neutrino-nucleus scattering simulation, or by the alternative models for the nuclear dependence of inelastic scattering that are considered.
Collapse
|
38
|
van West H, Hodgson B, Parent E, Samuel S, Hodgson B, Ferland C, Soroceanu A, Soroceanu A, Protopsaltis T, Protopsaltis T, Radovanovic I, Amritanand R, Shamji M, Haugo K, Malham G, Jarzem P, Rampersaud Y, Tomkins-Lane C, Manson N, Malham G, Rampersaud Y, Malham G, Malham G, King V, Goldstein C, Fisher C, Fehlings M, Fisher C, Wong E, Sardar Z, Christie S, Patel A, Pinkoski C, Ahn H, Drew B, Dvorak M, Pezeshki P, Altaf F, Wilde P, Rampersaud Y, Sparrey C, Tetreault L, Fehlings M, Tetreault L, Rampersaud R, Jack A, Johnstone R, Fernandes A, Urquhart J, Morokoff A, Manson N, Tomkins-Lane C, Phan P, Evaniew N, Shamji M, Manson J, Rampersaud Y, Nault ML, St-Pierre GH, Larouche J, Lewis S, Wilgenbusch C, Lewis S, Rampersaud Y, Johnson R, Cushnie D, Sridharan S, Street J, Gregg C, Missiuna P, Abraham E, Abraham E, Manson N, Huang E, Passmore S, Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Moulin D, Turgeon I, Roy-Beaudry M, Bourassa N, Petit Y, Parent. S, Chabot S, Westover L, Hill D, Moreau M, Hedden D, Lou E, Adeeb. S, Smith M, Bridge C, Hsu B, Gray. R, Group PORSCHES, Saran N, Mac-Thiong JM, Stone L, Ouellet. J, Protopsaltis T, Terran J, Bronsard N, Smith J, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Hostin R, Hart R, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Ames C, Schwab F, Lafage. V, Schwab F, Lafage V, Protopsaltis T, Ames C, Bess S, Smith J, Errico. T, Schwab F, Soroceanu A, Bronsard N, Smith J, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage. V, Terran J, Soroceanu A, Bronsard N, Smith J, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Kim HJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Ames C, Schwab F, Lafage. V, Urquhart J, Gananapathy V, Siddiqi F, Gurr K, Bailey C, Ravi B, David K, Rampersaud. R, Tu Y, Salter. M, Nichol H, Fourney D, Kelly. M, Parker R, Ellis N, Blecher C, Chow F, Claydon. M, Sardar Z, Alexander D, Oxner W, Plessis SD, Yee A, Wai. E, Lewis S, Davey J, Gandhi R, Mahomed. N, Hu R, Thomas K, Hepler C, Choi K, Rowed K, Haig. A, Lam. K, Parker R, Blecher C, Seex. K, Perruccio A, Gandhi R, Program. UHNA, Ellis N, Parker R, Goss B, Blecher C, Ballok. Z, Parker R, Ellis N, Chan P, Varma. D, Swart A, Winder M, Varga PP, Gokaslan Z, Boriani S, Luzzati A, Rhines L, Fisher C, Chou D, Williams R, Dekutoski M, Quraishi N, Bettegowda C, Kawahara N, Fehlings. M, Versteeg A, Boriani S, Varga PP, Dekutoski M, Luzzati A, Gokaslan Z, Williams R, Reynolds J, Fehlings M, Bettegowda C, Rhines. L, Zamorano J, Nater A, Tetrault L, Varga P, Gokaslan Z, Boriani S, Fisher C, Rhines L, Bettegowda C, Kawahara N, Chou. D, Fehlings M, Kopjar B, Vaccaro A, Arnold P, Schuster J, Finkelstein J, Rhines L, Dekutoski M, Gokaslan Z, France. J, Whyne C, Singh D, Ford. M, Aldebeyan W, Ouellet J, Steffen T, Beckman L, Weber M, Jarzem. P, Kwon B, Ahn H, Bailey C, Fehlings M, Fourney D, Gagnon D, Tsai E, Tsui D, Parent S, Chen J, Dvorak M, Noonan V, Rivers C, Network RHSCIR, Batke J, Lenehan B, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Street. J, Fox R, Nataraj A, Bailey C, Christie S, Duggal N, Fehlings M, Finkelstein J, Fourney D, Hurlbert R, Kwon B, Townson A, Tsai E, Attabib N, Chen J, Dvorak M, Noonan V, Rivers C, Network. RHSCIR, Fehlings M, Paquet J, Ahn H, Attabib N, Bailey C, Christie S, Duggal N, Finkelstein J, Fourney D, Hurlbert R, Johnson M, Kwon B, Parent S, Tsai E, Dvorak M, Noonan V, Rivers C, Shen T, Network. RHSCIR, Fisher C, Kwon B, Drew B, Fehlings M, Paquet J, Ahn H, Attabib N, Bailey C, Christie S, Duggal N, Finkelstein J, Fourney D, Hurlbert R, Johnson M, Mac-Thiong JM, Parent S, Tsai E, Fallah N, Noonan V, Rivers C, Network RHSCIR, Davidson S, McCann C, Akens M, Murphy K, Whyne C, Sherar M, Yee. A, Belanger L, Ronco J, Dea N, Paquette S, Boyd M, Street J, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Kwon B, Gonzalvo A, Fitt G, Liew S, de la Harpe D, Turner P, Rogers M, Bidos A, Fanti C, Young B, Drew B, Puskas. D, Tam H, Manansala S, Nosov V, Delva M, Alshafai N, Kopjar B, Tan G, Arnold P, Fehlings. M, Kopjar B, Arnold P, Ibrahim A, Tetrault. L, Kopjar B, Arnold P, Fehlings. M, Sundararajan K, Eng. S, St-Pierre G, Nataraj A, Urquhart J, Rosas-Arellano P, Tallon C, Gurr K, Siddiqi F, Bailey S, Bailey C, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud. R, Rosa-Arellano P, Tallon C, Bailey S, Gurr K, Bailey. C, Parker R, Milili L, Goss B, Malham. G, Green A, McKeon M, Abraham. E, Lafave L, Parnell J, Rempel J, Moriartey S, Andreas Y, Wilson P, Hepler C, Ray H, Hu. R, Ploumis A, Hess K, Wood. K, Yarascavitch B, Madden K, Ghert M, Drew B, Bhandari M, Kwok D, Tu YS, Salter. M, Hadlow. A, Tso P, Walker K, Lewis S, Davey J, Mahomed N, Coyte. P, Mac-Thiong JM, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I, Labelle H, deGuise J, Parent. S, Jack A, Fox R, Nataraj A, Paquette S, Leroux T, Yee A, Ahn H, Broad R, Fisher C, Hall H, Nataraj A, Hedden D, Christie S, Carey T, Mehta V, Fehlings M, Wadey. V, Dear T, Hashem. M, Fourney D, Goldstein S, Bodrogi A, Lipkus M, Dear T, Keshen S, Veillette C, Gandhi R, Adams D, Briggs N, Davey J, Fehlings M, Lau J, Lewis S, Magtoto R, Marshall K, Massicotte E, Ogilvie-Harris D, Sarro A, Syed K, Mohamed. N, Perera S, Taha A, Urquhart J, Gurr K, Siddiqi F, Bailey C, Thomas K, Cho R, Swamy G, Power C, Henari S, Lenehan. B, McIntosh G, Hall H, Hoffman. C, Karachi A, Pazionis T, AlShaya O, Green A, McKeon M, Manson. N, Green A, McKeon M, Manson. N, Green A, McKeon M, Murray J, Abraham. E, Thomas K, Suttor S, Goyal T, Littlewood J, Bains I, Bouchard J, Hu R, Jacobs B, Cho R, Swamy G, Johnson M, Pelleck V, Amad Y, Ramos E, Glazebrook C. Combined Spine Conference of the Canadian Spine Society New Zealand Orthopaedic Spine Society, Spine Society of Australia: Fairmont Château Lake Louise, Lake, Louise, Alberta, Tuesday, Feb. 25 to Saturday, Mar. 1, 20141.1.01 The use of suspension radiographs to predict LIV tilt.1.1.02 Surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis without fusion: an animal model.1.1.03 Are full torso surface topography postural measurements more sensitive to change than back only parameters in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and a main thoracic curve?1.2.04 Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic kyphosis: comparative radiographic analysis of round versus rail rods.1.2.05 Scoliosis surgery in spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy: Is fusion to the pelvis always necessary? A 4–18-year follow-up study.1.2.06 Identification and validation of pain-related biomarkers surrounding spinal surgery in adolescents.1.3.07 Cervical sagittal deformity develops after PJK in adult throacolumbar deformity correction: radiographic analysis using a novel global sagittal angular parameter, the CTPA.1.3.08 Impact of obesity on complications and patient-reported outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery.1.3.09 The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of sagittal deformity, accounts for both pelvic retroversion and truncal inclination and correlates strongly with HRQOL.1.4.10 Determining cervical sagittal deformity when it is concurrent with thoracolumbar deformity.1.4.11 The influence of sagittal balance and pelvic parameters on the outcome of surgically treated patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.1.4.12 Predictors of degenerative spondylolisthesis and loading translation in surgical lumbar spinal stenosis patients.2.1.13 Mechanical allodynia following disc herniation requires intraneural macrophage infiltration and can be blocked by systemic selenium delivery or attenuation of BDNF activity.2.1.14 The effect of alanyl-glutamine on epidural fibrosis in a rat laminectomy model.2.1.15 Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.2.2.16 2-year results of a Canadian, multicentre, blinded, pilot study of a novel peptide in promoting lumbar spine fusion.2.2.17 Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: long-term change in health-related quality of life.2.2.18 Changes in objectively measured walking performance, function, and pain following surgery for spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal stenosis.2.3.19 A prospective multicentre observational data-monitored study of minimally invasive fusion to treat degenerative lumbar disorders: complications and outcomes at 1-year follow-up.2.3.20 Assessment and classification of subsidence in lateral interbody fusion using serial computed tomography.2.3.21 Predictors of willingness to undergo spinal and orthopaedic surgery after surgical consultation.2.4.22 Indirect foraminal decompression is independent of facet arthropathy in extreme lateral interbody fusion.2.4.23 Cervical artificial disc replacement with ProDisc-C: clinical and radiographic outcomes with long-term follow-up.2.4.24 Tantalum trabecular metal implants in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.3.1.25 Hemangiomas of the spine: results of surgical management and prognostic variables for local recurrence and mortality in a multicentre study.3.1.26 Chondrosarcomas of the spine: prognostic variables for local recurrence and mortality in a multicentre study.3.1.27 Risk factors for recurrence of surgically treated spine schwannomas: analysis of 169 patients from a multicentre international database.3.2.28 Survival pattern and the effect of surgery on health related quality of life and functional outcome in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression from lung cancer — the AOSpine North America prospective multicentre study.3.2.29 A biomechanical assessment of kyphoplasty as a stand-alone treatment in a human cadaveric burst fracture model.3.2.30 What is safer in incompetent vertebrae with posterior wall defects, kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty: a study in vertebral analogs.3.3.31 Feasibility of recruiting subjects for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) clinical trials in Canada.3.3.32 Prospective analysis of adverse events in elderly patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.3.3.33 Does traction before surgery influence time to neural decompression in patients with spinal cord injury?3.4.34 Current treatment of individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: Do we need age-specific guidelines?3.4.35 Current surgical practice for traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada.3.4.36 The importance of “time to surgery” for traumatic spinal cord injured patients: results from an ambispective Canadian cohort of 949 patients.3.5.37 Assessment of a novel coil-shaped radiofrequency probe in the porcine spine.3.5.38 The effect of norepinephrine and dopamine on cerebrospinal fluid pressure after acute spinal cord injury.3.5.39 The learning curve of pedicle screw placement: How many screws are enough?4.1.40 Preliminary report from the Ontario Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC).4.1.41 A surrogate model of the spinal cord complex for simulating bony impingement.4.1.42 Clinical and surgical predictors of specific complications following surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the multicentre, prospective AOSpine international study on 479 patients.4.2.43 Outcomes of surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the prospective, multicentre, AOSpine international study in 479 patients.4.2.44 A clinical prediction rule for clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: analysis of an international AOSpine prospective multicentre data set of 757 subjects.4.2.45 The prevalence and impact of low back and leg pain among aging Canadians: a cross-sectional survey.4.3.46 Adjacent segment pathology: Progressive disease course or a product of iatrogenic fusion?4.3.47 Natural history of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in patients with spinal stenosis.4.3.48 Changes in self-reported clinical status and health care utilization during wait time for surgical spine consultation: a prospective observational study.4.3.49 The Canadian surgical wait list for lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis has a detrimental effect on patient outcomes.4.3.50 Segmental lordosis is independent of interbody cage position in XLIF.4.3.51 Elevated patient BMI does not negatively affect self-reported outcomes of thoracolumbar surgery.1.5.52 The Spinal Stenosis Pedometer and Nutrition Lifestyle Intervention (SSPANLI): development and pilot.1.5.53 Study evaluating the variability of surgical strategy planning for patients with adult spinal deformity.1.5.54 Atlantoaxial instability in acute odontoid fractures is associated with nonunion and mortality.1.5.55 Peripheral hypersensitivity to subthreshold stimuli persists after resolution of acute experimental disc-herniation neuropathy.1.5.56 Radiation induced lumbar spinal osteonecrosis: case report and literature review.1.5.57 Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: Part 2 — estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.1.5.58 A predictive model of progression for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on 3D spine parameters at first visit.1.5.59 Development of a clinical prediction model for surgical decision making in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.2.5.60 Canadian spine surgery fellowship education: evaluating opportunity in developing a nationally based training curriculum.2.5.61 Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe proximal thoracic junctional kyphosis.2.5.62 A comparison of spine surgery referrals triaged through a multidisciplinary care pathway versus conventional referrals.2.5.63 Results and complications of posterior-based 3 column osteotomies in patients with previously fused spinal deformities.2.5.64 Orthopaedic Surgical AdVerse Event Severity (Ortho-SAVES) system: identifying opportunities for improved patient safety and resource utilization.2.5.65 Spontaneous spinal extra-axial haematomas — surgical experience in Otago and Southland 2011–2013.2.5.66 Obesity and spinal epidural lipomatosis in cauda equina syndrome.2.5.67 Factors affecting restoration of lumbar lordosis in adult degenerative scoliosis patients treated with lateral trans-psoas interbody fusion.3.6.68 Systematic review of complications in spinal surgery: a comparison of retrospective and prospective study design.3.6.69 Postsurgical rehabilitation patients have similar fear avoidance behaviour levels as those in nonoperative care.3.6.70 Outcomes of surgical treatment of adolescent spondyloptosis: a case series.3.6.71 Surgical success in primary versus revision thoracolumbar spine surgery.3.6.72 The effect of smoking on subjective patient outcomes in thoracolumbar surgery.3.6.73 Modelling patient recovery to predict outcomes following elective thoracolumbar surgery for degenerative pathologies.3.6.74 Outcomes from trans-psoas versus open approaches in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.3.6.75 Lumbar spinal stenosis and presurgical assessment: the impact of walking induced strain on a performance-based outcome measure. Can J Surg 2014. [DOI: 10.1503/cjs.005614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
39
|
Tanriover B, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, Radhakrishnan J, Nickolas TL, Stone PW, Tsapepas DS, Crew RJ, Dube GK, Sandoval PR, Samstein B, Dogan E, Gaston RS, Tanriover JN, Ratner LE, Hardy MA, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Devan J, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Felix J, Fields L, Fiorentini GA, Gago AM, Gallagher H, Gran R, Harris DA, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Jerkins M, Kafka T, Kordosky M, Kulagin SA, Le T, Maggi G, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, Martin Mari C, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Osta J, Palomino JL, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Rakotondravohitra L, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rodrigues PA, Savage DG, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Simon C, Snider FD, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Valencia E, Velásquez JP, Walton T, Wolcott J, Zavala G, Zhang D, Ziemer BP. Kidneys at higher risk of discard: expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:404-15. [PMID: 24472195 PMCID: PMC4058786 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Revised: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 10/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Half of the recovered expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are discarded in the United States. A new kidney allocation system offers kidneys at higher risk of discard, Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI)>85%, to a wider geographic area to promote broader sharing and expedite utilization. Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) based on the KDPI is a potential option to streamline allocation of kidneys which otherwise would have been discarded. To assess the clinical utility of the KDPI in kidneys at higher risk of discard, we analyzed the OPTN/UNOS Registry that included the deceased donor kidneys recovered between 2002 and 2012. The primary outcomes were allograft survival, patient survival and discard rate based on different KDPI categories (<80%, 80-90% and >90%). Kidneys with KDPI>90% were associated with increased odds of discard (OR=1.99, 95% CI 1.74-2.29) compared to ones with KDPI<80%. DKTs of KDPI>90% were associated with lower overall allograft failure (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.89) and better patient survival (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98) compared to single ECD kidneys with KDPI>90%. Kidneys at higher risk of discard may be offered in the up-front allocation system as a DKT. Further modeling and simulation studies are required to determine a reasonable KDPI cutoff percentile.
Collapse
|
40
|
Fiorentini GA, Schmitz DW, Rodrigues PA, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Baldin B, Baumbaugh A, Bodek A, Boehnlein D, Boyd S, Bradford R, Brooks WK, Budd H, Butkevich A, Martinez Caicedo DA, Castromonte CM, Christy ME, Chung H, Chvojka J, Clark M, da Motta H, Damiani DS, Danko I, Datta M, Day M, DeMaat R, Devan J, Draeger E, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Edmondson DA, Felix J, Fields L, Fitzpatrick T, Gago AM, Gallagher H, George CA, Gielata JA, Gingu C, Gobbi B, Gran R, Grossman N, Hanson J, Harris DA, Heaton J, Higuera A, Howley IJ, Hurtado K, Jerkins M, Kafka T, Kaisen J, Kanter MO, Keppel CE, Kilmer J, Kordosky M, Krajeski AH, Kulagin SA, Le T, Lee H, Leister AG, Locke G, Maggi G, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Mousseau J, Naples D, Nelson JK, Niculescu G, Niculescu I, Ochoa N, O'Connor CD, Olsen J, Osmanov B, Osta J, Palomino JL, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Peña C, Rakotondravohitra L, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rude C, Sassin KE, Schellman H, Schneider RM, Schulte EC, Simon C, Snider FD, Snyder MC, Sobczyk JT, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Tan W, Tice BG, Tzanakos G, Velásquez JP, Walding J, Walton T, Wolcott J, Wolthuis BA, Woodward N, Zavala G, Zeng HB, Zhang D, Zhu LY, Ziemer BP. Measurement of muon neutrino quasielastic scattering on a hydrocarbon target at Eν ~ 3.5 GeV. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2013; 111:022502. [PMID: 23889389 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.111.022502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
We report a study of ν(μ) charged-current quasielastic events in the segmented scintillator inner tracker of the MINERvA experiment running in the NuMI neutrino beam at Fermilab. The events were selected by requiring a μ- and low calorimetric recoil energy separated from the interaction vertex. We measure the flux-averaged differential cross section, dσ/dQ², and study the low energy particle content of the final state. Deviations are found between the measured dσ/dQ² and the expectations of a model of independent nucleons in a relativistic Fermi gas. We also observe an excess of energy near the vertex consistent with multiple protons in the final state.
Collapse
|
41
|
Fields L, Chvojka J, Aliaga L, Altinok O, Baldin B, Baumbaugh A, Bodek A, Boehnlein D, Boyd S, Bradford R, Brooks WK, Budd H, Butkevich A, Martinez Caicedo DA, Castromonte CM, Christy ME, Chung H, Clark M, da Motta H, Damiani DS, Danko I, Datta M, Day M, DeMaat R, Devan J, Draeger E, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Edmondson DA, Felix J, Fitzpatrick T, Fiorentini GA, Gago AM, Gallagher H, George CA, Gielata JA, Gingu C, Gobbi B, Gran R, Grossman N, Hanson J, Harris DA, Heaton J, Higuera A, Howley IJ, Hurtado K, Jerkins M, Kafka T, Kaisen J, Kanter MO, Keppel CE, Kilmer J, Kordosky M, Krajeski AH, Kulagin SA, Le T, Lee H, Leister AG, Locke G, Maggi G, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Mousseau J, Naples D, Nelson JK, Niculescu G, Niculescu I, Ochoa N, O'Connor CD, Olsen J, Osmanov B, Osta J, Palomino JL, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Peña C, Rakotondravohitra L, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rodrigues PA, Rude C, Sassin KE, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Schneider RM, Schulte EC, Simon C, Snider FD, Snyder MC, Sobczyk JT, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Tan W, Tice BG, Tzanakos G, Velásquez JP, Walding J, Walton T, Wolcott J, Wolthuis BA, Woodward N, Zavala G, Zeng HB, Zhang D, Zhu LY, Ziemer BP. Measurement of muon antineutrino quasielastic scattering on a hydrocarbon target at Eν ~ 3.5 GeV. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2013; 111:022501. [PMID: 23889388 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.111.022501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
We have isolated ν(μ) charged-current quasielastic (QE) interactions occurring in the segmented scintillator tracking region of the MINERvA detector running in the NuMI neutrino beam at Fermilab. We measure the flux-averaged differential cross section, dσ/dQ², and compare to several theoretical models of QE scattering. Good agreement is obtained with a model where the nucleon axial mass, M(A), is set to 0.99 GeV/c² but the nucleon vector form factors are modified to account for the observed enhancement, relative to the free nucleon case, of the cross section for the exchange of transversely polarized photons in electron-nucleus scattering. Our data at higher Q² favor this interpretation over an alternative in which the axial mass is increased.
Collapse
|
42
|
Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Brown BC, Bugel L, Cheng G, Church ED, Conrad JM, Dharmapalan R, Djurcic Z, Finley DA, Ford R, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Grange J, Huelsnitz W, Ignarra C, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Louis WC, Mariani C, Marsh W, Mills GB, Mirabal J, Moore CD, Mousseau J, Nienaber P, Osmanov B, Pavlovic Z, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Shaevitz MH, Spitz J, Stancu I, Tayloe R, Van de Water RG, White DH, Wickremasinghe DA, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED. Improved search for ν¯(μ)→ν¯(e) oscillations in the MiniBooNE experiment. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2013; 110:161801. [PMID: 23679593 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.110.161801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of ν[over ¯](e) appearance data from 11.27×10(20) protons on target in the antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of 2 over the previously reported results. An event excess of 78.4±28.5 events (2.8σ) is observed in the energy range 200<E(ν)(QE)<1250 MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, ν[over ¯](μ)→ν[over ¯](e), the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of 66% while the background-only fit has a χ(2) probability of 0.5% relative to the best fit. The data are consistent with antineutrino oscillations in the 0.01<Δm(2)<1.0 eV(2) range and have some overlap with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector. All of the major backgrounds are constrained by in situ event measurements so nonoscillation explanations would need to invoke new anomalous background processes. The neutrino mode running also shows an excess at low energy of 162.0±47.8 events (3.4σ) but the energy distribution of the excess is marginally compatible with a simple two neutrino oscillation formalism. Expanded models with several sterile neutrinos can reduce the incompatibility by allowing for CP violating effects between neutrino and antineutrino oscillations.
Collapse
|
43
|
Ray H, Verhoef M. P05.60. Dragon boat racing: an evaluation of its influence on the health-related quality of life of breast cancer survivors. BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2012. [PMCID: PMC3373890 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-s1-p420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
44
|
Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Anderson CE, Brice SJ, Brown BC, Bugel L, Conrad JM, Dharmapalan R, Djurcic Z, Fleming BT, Ford R, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Mirabal J, Grange J, Green JA, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Linden SK, Louis WC, Mahn KBM, Marsh W, Mauger C, Metcalf W, Mills GB, Moore CD, Mousseau J, Nelson RH, Nguyen V, Nienaber P, Nowak JA, Osmanov B, Pavlovic Z, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Schirato R, Shaevitz MH, Sorel M, Spitz J, Stancu I, Stefanski RJ, Tayloe R, Tzanov M, Van de Water RG, Wascko MO, White DH, Wilking MJ, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED. Event excess in the MiniBooNE search for ¯νμ→¯νe oscillations. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2010; 105:181801. [PMID: 21231096 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.105.181801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2010] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from a search for ¯ν_{μ}→¯ν_{e} oscillations, using a data sample corresponding to 5.66×10²⁰ protons on target. An excess of 20.9±14.0 events is observed in the energy range 475<E_{ν}^{QE}<1250 MeV, which, when constrained by the observed ¯ν_{μ} events, has a probability for consistency with the background-only hypothesis of 0.5%. On the other hand, fitting for ¯ν_{μ}→¯ν_{e} oscillations, the best-fit point has a χ² probability of 8.7%. The data are consistent with ¯ν_{μ}→¯ν_{e} oscillations in the 0.1 to 1.0 eV² Δm² range and with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Collapse
|
45
|
Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Anderson CE, Bazarko AO, Brice SJ, Brown BC, Bugel L, Cao J, Coney L, Conrad JM, Cox DC, Curioni A, Djurcic Z, Finley DA, Fisher M, Fleming BT, Ford R, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Grange J, Green C, Green JA, Hart TL, Hawker E, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Kasper P, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Kourbanis I, Koutsoliotas S, Laird EM, Linden SK, Link JM, Liu Y, Liu Y, Louis WC, Mahn KBM, Marsh W, Mauger C, McGary VT, McGregor G, Metcalf W, Meyers PD, Mills F, Mills GB, Monroe J, Moore CD, Mousseau J, Nelson RH, Nienaber P, Nowak JA, Osmanov B, Ouedraogo S, Patterson RB, Pavlovic Z, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Prebys E, Raaf JL, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Sandberg V, Schirato R, Schmitz D, Shaevitz MH, Shoemaker FC, Smith D, Soderberg M, Sorel M, Spentzouris P, Spitz J, Stancu I, Stefanski RJ, Sung M, Tanaka HA, Tayloe R, Tzanov M, Van de Water RG, Wascko MO, White DH, Wilking MJ, Yang HJ, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED. Search for core-collapse supernovae using the MiniBooNE neutrino detector. Int J Clin Exp Med 2010. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.81.032001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
46
|
Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Anderson CE, Brice SJ, Brown BC, Bugel L, Conrad JM, Djurcic Z, Fleming BT, Ford R, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Gonzales J, Grange J, Green C, Green JA, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Linden SK, Louis WC, Mahn KBM, Marsh W, Mauger C, McGary VT, Metcalf W, Mills GB, Moore CD, Mousseau J, Nelson RH, Nienaber P, Nowak JA, Osmanov B, Pavlovic Z, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Shaevitz MH, Sorel M, Spitz J, Stancu I, Stefanski RJ, Tayloe R, Tzanov M, Van de Water RG, Wascko MO, White DH, Wilking MJ, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED. Search for electron antineutrino appearance at the deltam(2) approximately 1 eV(2) Scale. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2009; 103:111801. [PMID: 19792365 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.111801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The MiniBooNE Collaboration reports initial results from a search for nu(mu)-->nu(e) oscillations. A signal-blind analysis was performed using a data sample corresponding to 3.39x10(20) protons on target. The data are consistent with background prediction across the full range of neutrino energy reconstructed assuming quasielastic scattering, 200<E(nu)(QE)<3000 MeV: 144 electronlike events have been observed in this energy range, compared to an expectation of 139.2+/-17.6 events. No significant excess of events has been observed, both at low energy, 200-475 MeV, and at high energy, 475-1250 MeV. The data are inconclusive with respect to antineutrino oscillations suggested by data from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Collapse
|
47
|
Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Anderson CE, Bazarko AO, Brice SJ, Brown BC, Bugel L, Cao J, Coney L, Conrad JM, Cox DC, Curioni A, Djurcic Z, Finley DA, Fleming BT, Ford R, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Green C, Green JA, Hart TL, Hawker E, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Kasper P, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Kourbanis I, Koutsoliotas S, Laird EM, Linden SK, Link JM, Liu Y, Liu Y, Louis WC, Mahn KBM, Marsh W, McGary VT, McGregor G, Metcalf W, Meyers PD, Mills F, Mills GB, Monroe J, Moore CD, Nelson RH, Nienaber P, Nowak JA, Osmanov B, Ouedraogo S, Patterson RB, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Prebys E, Raaf JL, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Sandberg V, Schirato R, Schmitz D, Shaevitz MH, Shoemaker FC, Smith D, Soderberg M, Sorel M, Spentzouris P, Spitz J, Stancu I, Stefanski RJ, Sung M, Tanaka HA, Tayloe R, Tzanov M, Van de Water R, Wascko MO, White DH, Wilking MJ, Yang HJ, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED. Measurement of the ratio of the numu charged-current single-pion production to quasielastic scattering with a 0.8 GeV neutrino beam on mineral oil. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2009; 103:081801. [PMID: 19792715 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.081801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Using high statistics samples of charged-current numu interactions, the MiniBooNE [corrected] Collaboration reports a measurement of the single-charged-pion production to quasielastic cross section ratio on mineral oil (CH2), both with and without corrections for hadron reinteractions in the target nucleus. The result is provided as a function of neutrino energy in the range 0.4 GeV<Enu<2.4 GeV with 11% precision in the region of highest statistics. The results are consistent with previous measurements and the prediction from historical neutrino calculations.
Collapse
|
48
|
Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Anderson CE, Bazarko AO, Brice SJ, Brown BC, Bugel L, Cao J, Coney L, Conrad JM, Cox DC, Curioni A, Djurcic Z, Finley DA, Fleming BT, Ford R, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Grange J, Green C, Green JA, Hart TL, Hawker E, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Kasper P, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Kourbanis I, Koutsoliotas S, Laird EM, Linden SK, Link JM, Liu Y, Liu Y, Louis WC, Mahn KBM, Marsh W, Mauger C, McGary VT, McGregor G, Metcalf W, Meyers PD, Mills F, Mills GB, Monroe J, Moore CD, Mousseau J, Nelson RH, Nienaber P, Nowak JA, Osmanov B, Ouedraogo S, Patterson RB, Pavlovic Z, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Prebys E, Raaf JL, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Sandberg V, Schirato R, Schmitz D, Shaevitz MH, Shoemaker FC, Smith D, Soderberg M, Sorel M, Spentzouris P, Spitz J, Stancu I, Stefanski RJ, Sung M, Tanaka HA, Tayloe R, Tzanov M, Van de Water RG, Wascko MO, White DH, Wilking MJ, Yang HJ, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED. Search for muon neutrino and antineutrino disappearance in MiniBooNE. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2009; 103:061802. [PMID: 19792551 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.061802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The MiniBooNE Collaboration reports a search for nu_{micro} and nu[over]_{micro} disappearance in the Deltam;{2} region of 0.5-40 eV;{2}. These measurements are important for constraining models with extra types of neutrinos, extra dimensions, and CPT violation. Fits to the shape of the nu_{micro} and nu[over]_{micro} energy spectra reveal no evidence for disappearance at the 90% confidence level (C.L.) in either mode. The test of nu[over]_{micro} disappearance probes a region below Deltam;{2} = 40 eV;{2} never explored before.
Collapse
|
49
|
Adamson P, Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Anderson CE, Bazarko AO, Bishai M, Brice SJ, Brown BC, Bugel L, Cao J, Choudhary BC, Coney L, Conrad JM, Cox DC, Curioni A, Djurcic Z, Finley DA, Fleming BT, Ford R, Gallagher HR, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Green C, Green JA, Harris D, Hart TL, Hawker E, Hylen J, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Kasper P, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Kopp S, Kourbanis I, Koutsoliotas S, Laird EM, Linden SK, Link JM, Liu Y, Liu Y, Loiacono L, Louis WC, Marchionni A, Mahn KBM, Marsh W, McGregor G, Messier MD, Metcalf W, Meyers PD, Mills F, Mills GB, Monroe J, Moore CD, Nelson JK, Nelson RH, Nguyen VT, Nienaber P, Nowak JA, Ouedraogo S, Patterson RB, Pavlovic Z, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Prebys E, Raaf JL, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Sandberg V, Schirato R, Schmitz D, Shaevitz MH, Shoemaker FC, Smart W, Smith D, Sodeberg M, Sorel M, Spentzouris P, Stancu I, Stefanski RJ, Sung M, Tanaka HA, Tayloe R, Tzanov M, Vahle P, Van de Water R, Viren B, Wascko MO, White DH, Wilking MJ, Yang HJ, Yumiceva FX, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED, Zwaska R. Measurement of numicro and nue events in an off-axis horn-focused neutrino beam. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2009; 102:211801. [PMID: 19519094 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.102.211801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2008] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
We report the first observation of off-axis neutrino interactions in the MiniBooNE detector from the NuMI beam line at Fermilab. The MiniBooNE detector is located 745 m from the NuMI production target, at 110 mrad angle (6.3 degrees) with respect to the NuMI beam axis. Samples of charged-current quasielastic numicro and nue interactions are analyzed and found to be in agreement with expectation. This provides a direct verification of the expected pion and kaon contributions to the neutrino flux and validates the modeling of the NuMI off-axis beam.
Collapse
|
50
|
Aguilar-Arevalo AA, Anderson CE, Bazarko AO, Brice SJ, Brown BC, Bugel L, Cao J, Coney L, Conrad JM, Cox DC, Curioni A, Djurcic Z, Finley DA, Fleming BT, Ford R, Garcia FG, Garvey GT, Green C, Green JA, Hart TL, Hawker E, Imlay R, Johnson RA, Karagiorgi G, Kasper P, Katori T, Kobilarcik T, Kourbanis I, Koutsoliotas S, Laird EM, Linden SK, Link JM, Liu Y, Liu Y, Louis WC, Mahn KBM, Marsh W, McGregor G, Metcalf W, Meyers PD, Mills F, Mills GB, Monroe J, Moore CD, Nelson RH, Nguyen VT, Nienaber P, Nowak JA, Ouedraogo S, Patterson RB, Perevalov D, Polly CC, Prebys E, Raaf JL, Ray H, Roe BP, Russell AD, Sandberg V, Schirato R, Schmitz D, Shaevitz MH, Shoemaker FC, Smith D, Sodeberg M, Sorel M, Spentzouris P, Stancu I, Stefanski RJ, Sung M, Tanaka HA, Tayloe R, Tzanov M, Van de Water R, Wascko MO, White DH, Wilking MJ, Yang HJ, Zeller GP, Zimmerman ED. Unexplained excess of electronlike events from a 1-GeV neutrino beam. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2009; 102:101802. [PMID: 19392103 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.102.101802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2008] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The MiniBooNE Collaboration observes unexplained electronlike events in the reconstructed neutrino energy range from 200 to 475 MeV. With 6.46x10;{20} protons on target, 544 electronlike events are observed in this energy range, compared to an expectation of 415.2+/-43.4 events, corresponding to an excess of 128.8+/-20.4+/-38.3 events. The shape of the excess in several kinematic variables is consistent with being due to either nu_{e} and nu[over ]_{e} charged-current scattering or nu_{mu} neutral-current scattering with a photon in the final state. No significant excess of events is observed in the reconstructed neutrino energy range from 475 to 1250 MeV, where 408 events are observed compared to an expectation of 385.9+/-35.7 events.
Collapse
|