The impact of the Safe Delivery Application on knowledge and skills managing postpartum haemorrhage in a low resource setting: a cluster randomized controlled trial in West Wollega region, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Postpartum haemorrhage is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in low-income countries. Improving health workers' competencies in obstetric emergencies in low-income settings, has been recognized as an important factor in preventing maternal mortality and morbidity. mHealth interventions in maternal and newborn health care has shown the potential to improve health service delivery. Strong study designs such as randomized controlled trials are missing to estimate the effectiveness of the mHealth interventions.

METHODS

Between August 2013 and August 2014, 70 health facilities in West Wollega Region, Ethiopia were included and randomized to intervention or control in a cluster randomized controlled trial. At intervention facilities birth attendants were provided with a smartphone with the SDA installed. Of 176 midwives and "health extension workers," 130 completed at 12 months follow-up. At baseline and after 6- and 12-months participants were assessed. Knowledge was tested by a Key Feature Questionnaire, skills by an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills in a structured role-play scenario.

RESULTS

Baseline skills scores were low and comparable with a median of 12/100 in the intervention and the control group. After 6 months skills had doubled in the intervention group (adjusted mean difference 29.6; 95% CI 24.2-35.1 compared to 1·8; 95% CI - 2.7 to 6.3 in the control group). At 12 months skills had further improved in the intervention group (adjusted mean difference 13.3; 95% CI 8.3-18.3 compared to 3.1; 95% CI - 1.0 to 7.3 in the control group). Knowledge scores also significantly improved in the intervention group compared to the control (adjusted mean difference after 12 months 8.5; 95% CI 2.0-15.0).

CONCLUSION

The Safe Delivery App more than doubled clinical skills for managing postpartum haemorrhage among birth attendants making it an attractive tool to reduce maternal mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrial.gov Identifier NCT01945931. September 5, 2013.

Anxiety and depression in women with asthma prior to fertility treatment

Objective

We investigate symptoms of anxiety and depression among women with asthma prior to fertility treatment.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of women screened for eligibility to the PRO-ART study (RCT of omalizumab versus placebo in asthmatic women undergoing fertility treatment (NCT03727971)). All participants were scheduled for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment at four public fertility clinics in Denmark. Data on demographics and asthma control (ACQ-5) were obtained. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and D, respectively) and defined as being present on both subscales if a score >7 was obtained. Spirometry, diagnostic asthma test, and measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were conducted.

Results

A total of 109 women with asthma were included (mean age 31.8 ± 4.6 and BMI 25.5 ± 4.6). Most women had male factor infertility (36.4%) or unexplained infertility (35.5%). Twenty-two percent of the patients reported uncontrolled asthma (ACQ-5 score > 1.5). The mean HADS-A and HADS-D scores were 6.0 ± 3.8 (95% CI 5.3-6.7) and 2.5 ± 2.2 (95% CI 2.1-3.0), respectively. Thirty (28.0%) women reported anxiety symptoms, and four (3.7%) had concomitant depressive symptoms. Uncontrolled asthma was significantly associated with both depressive (p = 0.04) and anxiety symptoms (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

More than 25% of women with asthma prior to fertility treatment had self-reported symptoms of anxiety, and just below 5% had self-reported depressive symptoms, possibly related to uncontrolled asthma.

Deficit of homozygosity among 1.52 million individuals and genetic causes of recessive lethality

Genotypes causing pregnancy loss and perinatal mortality are depleted among living individuals and are therefore difficult to find. To explore genetic causes of recessive lethality, we searched for sequence variants with deficit of homozygosity among 1.52 million individuals from six European populations. In this study, we identified 25 genes harboring protein-altering sequence variants with a strong deficit of homozygosity (10% or less of predicted homozygotes). Sequence variants in 12 of the genes cause Mendelian disease under a recessive mode of inheritance, two under a dominant mode, but variants in the remaining 11 have not been reported to cause disease. Sequence variants with a strong deficit of homozygosity are over-represented among genes essential for growth of human cell lines and genes orthologous to mouse genes known to affect viability. The function of these genes gives insight into the genetics of intrauterine lethality. We also identified 1077 genes with homozygous predicted loss-of-function genotypes not previously described, bringing the total set of genes completely knocked out in humans to 4785.

Danish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and electronic migration of the World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project Endometriosis Patient Questionnaire

Objectives

This study aims to translate and cross-culturally adapt the standard version of the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) EPHect Endometriosis Patient Questionnaire (EPQ) into Danish and to ensure equivalence of a Danish electronic version.

Methods

The translation, cultural adaption, and electronic migration followed recommendations from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the Critical Path Institute. Ten women with endometriosis were enrolled for cognitive debriefing of the paper version (pEPQ) after translation and back translation. The questionnaire was then migrated into an electronic version (eEPQ) and subsequently tested for usability and measurement equivalence by five women with endometriosis.

Results

Cross-cultural alterations were needed for medical terms, response options for ethnicity, the educational system, and measurement units. Thirteen questions were altered after back translation, while 21 underwent minor changes after cognitive debriefing. After testing the eEPQ, 13 questions were altered. Questions tested for measurement equivalence across the two modes of administration were found comparable. The median time-to-complete the pEPQ and eEPQ was 62 min (range: 29–110) and 63 min (range: 31–88), respectively. General comments included the questionnaire being relevant but long and repetitive.

Conclusions

We find the the Danish pEPQ and eEPQ similar and comparable to the original English instrument. However, attention must be drawn to questions regarding measurement units, ethnicity, and educational systems before cross-country comparison. The Danish pEPQ and eEPQ are suitable for obtaining subjective data on women with endometriosis.

Cell-free fetal DNA for genetic evaluation in Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss Study (COPL): a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

One in four pregnancies end in a pregnancy loss. Although the effect on couples is well documented, evidence-based treatments and prediction models are absent. Fetal aneuploidy is associated with a higher chance of a next successful pregnancy compared with euploid pregnancy loss in which underlying maternal conditions might be causal. Ploidy diagnostics are therefore advantageous but challenging as they require collection of the pregnancy tissue. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal blood has the potential for evaluation of fetal ploidy status, but no large-scale validation of the method has been done.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, women with a pregnancy loss were recruited as a part of the Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss (COPL) study from three gynaecological clinics at public hospitals in Denmark. Women were eligible for inclusion if older than 18 years with a pregnancy loss before gestational age 22 weeks (ie, 154 days) and with an intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound (including anembryonic sac), and women with pregnancies of unknown location or molar pregnancies were excluded. Maternal blood was collected while pregnancy tissue was still in situ or within 24 h after pregnancy tissue had passed and was analysed by genome-wide sequencing of cffDNA. Direct sequencing of the pregnancy tissue was done as reference.

FINDINGS

We included 1000 consecutive women, at the time of a pregnancy loss diagnosis, between Nov 12, 2020, and May 1, 2022. Results from the first 333 women with a pregnancy loss (recruited between Nov 12, 2020, and Aug 14, 2021) were used to evaluate the validity of cffDNA-based testing. Results from the other 667 women were included to evaluate cffDNA performance and result distribution in a larger cohort of 1000 women in total. Gestational age of fetus ranged from 35-149 days (mean of 70·5 days [SD 16·5], or 10 weeks plus 1 day). The cffDNA-based test had a sensitivity for aneuploidy detection of 85% (95% CI 79-90) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI 88-96) compared with direct sequencing of the pregnancy tissue. Among 1000 cffDNA-based test results, 446 (45%) were euploid, 405 (41%) aneuploid, 37 (4%) had multiple aneuploidies, and 112 (11%) were inconclusive. 105 (32%) of 333 women either did not manage to collect the pregnancy tissue or collected a sample classified as unknown tissue giving a high risk of being maternal.

INTERPRETATION

This validation of cffDNA-based testing in pregnancy loss shows the potential and feasibility of the method to distinguish euploid and aneuploid pregnancy loss for improved clinical management and benefit of future reproductive medicine and women's health research.

FUNDING

Ole Kirks Foundation, BioInnovation Institute Foundation, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Night-time smartphone use, sleep duration, sleep quality, and menstrual disturbances in young adult women: A population-based study with high-resolution tracking data

Study Objectives

To explore the relationship among night-time smartphone use, sleep duration, sleep quality, and menstrual disturbances in young adult women.

Methods

Women aged 18-40 years were included in the SmartSleep Study in which they objectively tracked their smartphone use via the SmartSleep app between self-reported sleep onset and offset times (n = 764) and responded to a survey (n = 1068), which included background characteristics, sleep duration, sleep quality (Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire), and menstrual characteristics (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics' definitions).

Results

The median tracking time was four nights (interquartile range: 2-8). Higher frequency (p = .05) and longer duration (p = .02) of night-time smartphone use were associated with long sleep duration (≥9 h), but not with poor sleep quality or short sleep duration (<7 h). Short sleep duration was associated with menstrual disturbances (OR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09 to 3.04) and irregular menstruation (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.08 to 4.10), and poor sleep quality was associated with menstrual disturbances (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.71), irregular menstruation (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.72), prolonged bleedings (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.44 to 4.43) and short-cycle duration (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.84). Neither duration nor frequency of night-time smartphone use was associated with menstrual disturbances.

Conclusions

Night-time smartphone use was associated with longer sleep duration, but not with menstrual disturbances in adult women. Short sleep duration and sleep quality were associated with menstrual disturbances. Further investigation of the effects of night-time smartphone use on sleep and female reproductive function in large prospective studies is needed.

Low-grade inflammation is negatively associated with live birth in women undergoing IVF

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is low-grade inflammation, detected by C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of IVF outcome addressing both blastocyst quality and pregnancy outcome?

DESIGN

This sub-study of a multicentre randomized controlled trial included 440 women undergoing IVF treatment with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Serum CRP was measured on cycle day 2-3 (baseline) and on the day of ovulation triggering. The association between CRP concentrations and reproductive outcomes (number of retrieved oocytes, number of good-quality blastocysts, pregnancy, pregnancy loss and live birth), were analysed, adjusting for relevant confounders.

RESULTS

A negative association was found between higher baseline CRP concentrations and live birth rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.96, P = 0.02) and higher CRP concentrations at baseline were associated with pregnancy loss among women who conceived (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.76, P = 0.01). When testing for a specific cut-off, CRP concentrations above 2.34 (the highest quartile) were more likely to be associated with pregnancy loss (P = 0.02) and a lower chance of live birth (P = 0.04) compared with the lowest quartile. No associations were found between CRP concentrations and pregnancy outcomes on the day of ovulation triggering, and there were no associations between CRP concentrations and the number of good-quality blastocysts.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher CRP concentrations at cycle day 2-3, before starting ovarian stimulation, are negatively associated with chance of live birth, possibly because of an increased risk of pregnancy loss. No association was found between the number of good-quality blastocysts and CRP concentration. More studies are needed to investigate the impact of low-grade inflammation.

Anti-Müllerian Hormone and live birth in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) associated with live birth rate (LBR) in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)?

DESIGN

Cohort study of women with unexplained RPL attending the RPL Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, between 2015 and 2021. AMH concentration was assessed upon referral, and LBR in the next pregnancy. RPL was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. Regression analyses were adjusted for age, number of previous losses, body mass index, smoking, treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and RPL treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 629 women were included; 507 (80.6%) became pregnant after referral. Pregnancy rates were similar for women with low and high AMH compared to women with medium AMH (81.9, 80.3 and 79.7%, respectively) (low AMH: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.47, P = 0.18; high AMH: aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59-1.64, P = 0.95). AMH concentrations were not associated with live birth. LBR was 59.5% in women with low AMH, 66.1% with medium AMH and 65.1% with high AMH (low AMH: aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.41-1.11, P = 0.12, high AMH: aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.59-1.56, P = 0.87). Live birth was lower in ART pregnancies (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.97, P = 0.04) and with higher numbers of previous losses (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.95, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In women with unexplained RPL, AMH was not associated with the chances of live birth in the next pregnancy. Screening for AMH in all women with RPL is not supported by current evidence. The chance of live birth among women with unexplained RPL achieving pregnancy by ART was low and needs to be confirmed and explored in future studies.

Endometriosis is associated with pregnancy loss: a nationwide historical cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To study whether endometriosis is associated with pregnancy loss and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

DESIGN

Nationwide historical cohort study with a nested case-control analysis.

SETTING

National health registers.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 29,563 women born between 1957 and 1997 were identified in the national health registers, diagnosed with endometriosis between 1977 and 2017, and age-matched 1:10 with 295,630 women without endometriosis. The number of pregnancy losses was assessed, and data were analyzed with conditional logistic regression.

INTERVENTION(S)

Endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, 8th Revision, 62530-62539, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, DN80.0-9).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcomes of interest were the numbers of pregnancy losses categorized as 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 losses, unadjusted and adjusted for gravidity, and RPL. The secondary outcome measures were the predefined types of pregnancy losses. Pregnancy loss was defined as the spontaneous demise of a pregnancy until 22 weeks of gestation. Primary RPL was defined as 3 or more consecutive pregnancy losses with no prior live birth or stillbirth, and secondary RPL was defined as 1 or more births followed by 3 or more consecutive losses.

RESULT(S)

A total of 18.9%, 3.9%, and 2.1% of ever-pregnant women with endometriosis had 1, 2, and ≥ 3 pregnancy losses compared with 17.3%, 3.5%, and 1.5% of the women without endometriosis, corresponding to the odds ratios of 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.17), 1.18 (1.10-1.26), and 1.44 (1.31-1.59), respectively. When adjusted also for gravidity, the corresponding results were 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.42), 1.75 (1.62-1.89), and 2.57 (2.31-2.85), respectively. The following predefined subgroups of RPL were positively associated with endometriosis: primary; secondary; secondary after giving birth to a boy; after a complicated delivery; and ≥ 3 pregnancy losses before the age of 30 years. Six endometriosis subgroup analyses found an association between endometriosis and pregnancy loss. These analyses were women diagnosed in the 4 decades between 1977 and 2017, women with adenomyosis, and women with adenomyosis only.

CONCLUSION(S)

This nationwide cohort study found endometriosis to be associated with pregnancy loss and RPL, and the association strengthened with an increasing number of losses.

ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022

STUDY QUESTION

What are the updates for the recommended management of women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) based on the best available evidence in the literature from 2017 to 2022?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The guideline development group (GDG) updated 11 existing recommendations on investigations and treatments for RPL, and how care should be organized, and added one new recommendation on adenomyosis investigation in women with RPL.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A previous ESHRE guideline on RPL was published in 2017 and needs to be updated.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

The guideline was developed and updated according to the structured methodology for development and update of ESHRE guidelines. The literature searches were updated, and assessments of relevant new evidence were performed. Relevant papers published between 31 March 2017 and 28 February 2022 and written in English were included. Cumulative live birth rate, live birth rate, and pregnancy loss rate (or miscarriage rate) were considered the critical outcomes.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were updated and discussed until consensus was reached within the GDG. A stakeholder review was organized after the updated draft was finalized. The final version was approved by the GDG and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The new version of the guideline provides 39 recommendations on risk factors, prevention, and investigation in couples with RPL, and 38 recommendations on treatments. These includes 62 evidence-based recommendations-of which 33 were formulated as strong recommendations and 29 as conditional-and 15 good practice points. Of the evidence-based recommendations, 12 (19.4%) were supported by moderate-quality evidence. The remaining recommendations were supported by low (34 recommendations; 54.8%), or very low-quality evidence (16 recommendations; 25.8%). Owing to the lack of evidence-based investigations and treatments in RPL care, the guideline also clearly mentions those investigations and treatments that should not be used for couples with RPL.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The guidelines have been updated; however, several investigations and treatments currently offered to couples with RPL have not been well studied; for most of these investigations and treatments, a recommendation against using the intervention or treatment was formulated based on insufficient evidence. Future studies may require these recommendations to be revised.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in RPL, based on the best and most recent evidence available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to stimulate further studies in RPL. Still, the absence of a unified definition of RPL is one of the most critical consequences of the limited scientific evidence in the field.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payment.O.B.C. reports being a member of the executive board of the European Society for Reproductive Immunology and has received payment for honoraria for giving lectures about RPL in Australia in 2020. M.G. reports unconditional research and educational grant received by the Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC from Guerbet, Merck and Ferring, not related to the presented work. S.L. reports position funding from EXAMENLAB Ltd. and ownership interest by stock or partnership of EXAMENLAB Ltd (CEO). S.Q. reports being a deputy director of Tommy's National centre for miscarriage research, with payment received by the institution for research, staff time, and consumables for research. H.S.N. reports grants with payment to institution from Freya Biosciences ApS, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, BioInnovation Institute, the Danish ministry of Education, Novo Nordic Foundation, Augustinus Fonden, Oda og Hans Svenningsens Fond, Demant Fonden, Ole Kirks Fond, and Independent Research Fund Denmark and speakers' fees for lectures from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, Astra Zeneca, IBSA Nordic and Cook Medical. She also reports to be an unpaid founder and chairman of a maternity foundation. M.-L.v.d.H. received small honoraria for lectures on RPL care. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders has been obtained.Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgment to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type.ESHRE makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically excludes any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose. (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.).

Chronic endometritis - is it time to clarify diagnostic criteria?

Chronic endometritis is a persistent, low-intensity inflammation of endometrial mucosa, characterized by the infiltration of plasma cells into the endometrial stroma This immunological alteration is thought to be a consequence of a bacterial infection. For a long time, chronic endometritis was poorly investigated and rarely considered in clinical practice because it is either asymptomatic or presents with no specific symptoms. Its association with adverse effects on fertility and retrospectively reported effectiveness of antibiotic treatment were the main reasons for a growing interest in this endometrial pathology. Chronic endometritis is now a hot topic in recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure research. Nevertheless, there are still no recommendations to include chronic endometritis investigation in a clinical evaluation of infertile patients. The uncertain role of this condition is an effect of significant differences in study results presented by different research groups. One important reason for these inconsistent findings is a lack of standardised chronic endometritis diagnostic methods. We present a review of the literature, focusing on the currently available chronic endometritis diagnostic techniques. The review is subdivided into three parts concerning the diagnostic accuracy of three main diagnostic modalities. Histopathological examination of endometrial tissue, hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine cavity and identification of the bacterial factor. In conclusion, it is of great importance to establish a consensus on the diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis. This is the only way to enhance international cooperation and create well-design multicenter studies to evidence the role of this endometrial pathology in infertility.

Pregnancy Loss and Cardiovascular Diseases in Women: Recent Findings and Potential Mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pregnancy loss (PL) has been acknowledged by the American Heart Association as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) later in life. This review aims to sum up recent findings (< ~ 5 years), concerning the link between PL and CVD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The association between PL and risk of CVD increased with increasing number of PLs and is inversely correlated to maternal age, indicating that the association concerns euploid PLs. Likely mechanisms leading to PL and an increased risk of CVD include endothelial dysfunction, a pro-inflammatory state, antiphospholipid syndrome, autoimmunity, and genetic predisposition. PL as an independent risk factor for CVD constitutes an obvious gateway for a more targeted approach to future research, prevention, and treatment. Future research should clarify the following questions to which the answers are still unknown: whether PL is (a) directly causing the increased risk of CVD or (b) sharing pathophysiological mechanisms also leading to CVD.

Asthma Is Associated With Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Women with asthma appear to have an increased risk of pregnancy loss (PL). The impact of asthma on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), defined as 3 consecutive losses, is, however, unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether having asthma before or during the fertile age is associated with PL and RPL.

METHODS

Based on Danish national health registers, we identified all women aged 6 to 45 years with at least 2 filled prescriptions of an antiasthma drug during the period 1977 to 2019. Women with asthma were compared with women without asthma. Pregnancy outcomes were retrieved for both groups from national health registers. Logistic regression with adjustment for the year of birth and educational level provided odds ratios (ORs) for the number of PLs. Subgroup analyses were conducted for early-onset (age 6-15 years), adult-onset (age 16-39 years), and late-onset (age 40-45 years) asthma. Lastly, we compared uncontrolled asthma (defined as ≥ 400 doses of a short-acting beta-2 agonist in a year) to controlled asthma (defined as < 400 doses of a short-acting beta-2 agonist in a year).

RESULTS

In a population of 1,309,786 women, we identified 128,553 women with asthma and 1,297,233 women without asthma. Compared with nonasthmatic women, women with asthma had ORs for 1, 2, and 3 or more PLs of 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.07), 1.09 (95% CI 1.05-1.13), and 1.18 (95% CI1.11-1.24), respectively, and for RPL of 1.19 (95% CI 1.12-1.27). In women with early-onset asthma, the OR of 3 or more PLs was 1.47 (95% CI 1.24-1.72). For women classified as having uncontrolled asthma compared with controlled asthma, we found a significant OR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.16-2.16) for 3 or more PLs.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant positive association between asthma and number of PLs and RPLs. Early-onset asthma and uncontrolled asthma were more strongly associated with PL than adult-onset and late-onset asthma and controlled asthma.

Pregnancy loss and risk of multiple sclerosis and autoimmune neurological disorder: A nationwide cohort study

Background

The loss of one or more pregnancies before viability (i.e. pregnancy loss or miscarriage), has been linked to an increased risk of diseases later in life such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Recurrent pregnancy loss (i.e. three consecutive pregnancy losses) and multiple sclerosis have both been linked to immunological traits, which could predispose to both occurrences. The objective of the current study was to investigate if pregnancy loss is associated with later autoimmune neurological disease.

Methods

This register-based cohort study, included the Danish female population age 12 or older between 1977–2017. Women were grouped hierarchically: 0, 1, 2, ≥3 pregnancy losses, primary recurrent pregnancy loss (i.e. not preceded by a delivery), and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss (i.e. preceded by a delivery). The main outcome was multiple sclerosis and additional outcomes were amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and myasthenia gravis. Bayesian Poisson regression estimated incidence rate ratios [IRR] and 95% credible intervals [CI] adjusted for year, age, live births, family history of an outcome, and education.

Results

After 40,380,194 years of follow-up, multiple sclerosis was diagnosed among 7,667 out of 1,513,544 included women (0.5%), median age at diagnosis 34.2 years (IQR 27.4–41.4 years), and median age at symptom onset 31.2 years (IQR 24.8–38.2). The adjusted IRR of multiple sclerosis after 1 pregnancy loss was: 1.03 (95% CI 0.95–1.11), 2 losses: 1.02 (95% CI 0.86–1.20), ≥3 non-consecutive losses: 0.81 (95% CI 0.51–1.24), primary recurrent pregnancy loss: 1.18 (95% CI 0.84–1.60), secondary recurrent pregnancy loss: 1.16 (95% CI 0.81–1.63), as compared to women with no pregnancy losses. Seven sensitivity analyses and analyses for additional outcomes did not show significantly elevated adjusted risk estimates.

Conclusions

In this nationwide study, pregnancy loss was not significantly associated with autoimmune neurological disorder.

Live Birth Rate in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss after In Vitro Fertilization with Concomitant Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Prednisone

Pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization (IVF) is at least as common as after spontaneous conception. Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) may often have an immunological background, and it is therefore relevant to test immune-based interventions in these patients. The objective was to investigate the effect of immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) and prednisone (PRS) as concomitant therapy to IVF in women with RPL after earlier IVF treatments. In a cohort study conducted at The Danish RPL Clinic, 41 women with three or more consecutive pregnancy losses after IVF underwent at least one further IVF cycle with concomitant immunotherapy from 2012 to 2017. The immunotherapy with IvIg and PRS was given before embryo transfer and repeatedly in the first trimester when pregnancy was achieved. Fourteen women (34.2%) achieved a live birth after the first embryo transfer with immunotherapy, and a total of 32/41 (78%) achieved a live birth after up to 4 embryo transfers. Baseline characteristics and the presence of autoantibodies were not significantly different among women achieving live birth or not. The observed 34% birth rate in women with RPL after IVF receiving immunotherapy appears higher than the expected 16-19% birth rate without immunotherapy and is similar to findings in a previous cohort from our clinic. Concomitant immunotherapy as described may be a promising intervention for women with RPL after IVF; however, the effect must be tested in a randomized controlled trial.

OUP accepted manuscript

STUDY QUESTION

What is the microbiome profile across different body sites in relation to the normal menstrual cycle (with and without hormonal contraception), recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) (before and during pregnancy, pregnancy loss or birth) and endometriosis (before, during and after surgery)? How do these profiles interact with genetics, environmental exposures, immunological and endocrine biomarkers?

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The microbiome is a key factor influencing human health and disease in areas as diverse as immune functioning, gastrointestinal disease and mental and metabolic disorders. There is mounting evidence to suggest that the reproductive microbiome may be influential in general and reproductive health, fertility and pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a prospective, longitudinal, observational study using a systems biology approach in three cohorts totalling 920 participants. Since microbiome profiles by shot-gun sequencing have never been investigated in healthy controls during varying phases of the menstrual cycle, patients with RPL and patients with endometriosis, no formal sample size calculation can be performed. The study period is from 2017 to 2024 and allows for longitudinal profiling of study participants to enable deeper understanding of the role of the microbiome and of host–microbe interactions in reproductive health.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Participants in each cohort are as follows: Part 1 MiMens—150 healthy women with or without hormonal contraception; Part 2 MiRPL—200 couples with RPL, 50 healthy couples with prior uncomplicated pregnancy and 150 newborns; Part 3 MiEndo—120 patients with endometriosis requiring surgery with or without hormonal treatment. Microbiome profiles from saliva, faeces, rectal mucosa, vaginal fluid and endometrium will be studied, as well as the Omics profile, endocrine disrupting chemicals and endocrine and immune factors in blood, hair, saliva and urine. Pregnancy loss products, seminal microbiome, HLA types, endometriotic tissue and genetic risk and comprehensive questionnaire data will also be studied, where appropriate. Correlations with mental and physical health will be evaluated.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work is supported by funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals ([#MiHSN01] to H.S.N., M.C.K., M.E.M., L.E.V., L.E., I.S.-K., F.B., L.W.H., E.F. and M.H.), Rigshospitalet’s Research Funds ([#E-22614-01 and #E-22614-02] to M.C.K. and [#E-22222-06] to S.B.), Niels and Desiree Yde’s Foundation (S.B., endocrine analyses [#2015-2784]), the Musikforlæggerne Agnes and Knut Mørk’s Foundation (S.B., endocrine and immune analyses [#35108-001]) and Oda and Hans Svenningsen’s Foundation ([#F-22614-08] to H.S.N.). Medical writing assistance with this manuscript was provided by Caroline Loat, PhD, and funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. H.S.N. reports personal fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck Denmark A/S, Ibsa Nordic, Astra Zeneca and Cook Medical outside the submitted work. K.W. is a full-time employee of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. No other conflicts are reported.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

N/A

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

N/A

[Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen and the impact of COVID-19 on the male reproductive system]

This article reviews the current studies published on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in semen and the potential effect of COVID-19 on male fertility. The aim was to provide insight into different possible mechanisms of involvement of the male reproductive system by SARS-CoV-2 infection and to evaluate the studies investigating the presence of virus in semen. It is concluded that the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission through semen is low and that COVID-19 may negatively affect semen parameters, but that the impairment is probably short-termed.

RUBIC (ReproUnion Biobank and Infertility Cohort): A binational clinical foundation to study risk factors, life course, and treatment of infertility and infertility-related morbidity

BACKGROUND

Infertility affects 15%-25% of all couples during their reproductive life span. It is a significant societal and public health problem with potential psychological, social, and economic consequences. Furthermore, infertility has been linked to adverse long-term health outcomes. Despite the advanced diagnostic and therapeutic techniques available, approximately 30% of infertile couples do not obtain a live birth after fertility treatment. For these couples, there are no further options to increase their chances of a successful pregnancy and live birth.

OBJECTIVES

Three overall questions will be studied: (1) What are the risk factors and natural life courses of infertility, early embryonic loss, and adverse pregnancy outcomes? (2) Can we develop new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for fecundity and treatment success? And (3) what are the health characteristics of women and men in infertile couples at the time of fertility treatment and during long-term follow-up?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

ReproUnion Biobank and Infertility Cohort (RUBIC) is established as an add-on to the routine fertility management at Copenhagen University Hospital Departments in the Capital Region of Denmark and Reproductive Medicine Centre at Skåne University Hospital in Sweden. The aim is to include a total of 5000 couples equally distributed between Denmark and Sweden. The first patients were enrolled in June 2020. All eligible infertile couples are prospectively asked to participate in the project. Participants complete an extensive questionnaire and undergo a physical examination and collection of biospecimens (blood, urine, hair, saliva, rectal swabs, feces, semen, endometrial biopsies, and vaginal swabs). After the cohort is established, the couples will be linked to the Danish and Swedish national registers to obtain information on parental, perinatal, childhood, and adult life histories, including disease and medication history. This will enable us to understand the causes of infertility and identify novel therapeutic options for this important societal problem.

Freiesleben NL, Nielsen HS. P–097 The impact of SARS-CoV–2 on male gonadal function. A longitudinal study

Study question

Can severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV–2) be detected in the semen of SARS-CoV–2 positive men, and does SARS-CoV–2 infection affect male reproductive function?

Summary answer

No SARS-CoV–2 RNA was detected in semen. An impact of SARS-CoV–2 infection on semen quality and reproductive hormone profile awaits evaluation at 3 + 6 months follow-up.

What is known already

SARS-CoV–2 may use angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)2 as an entry point into the cell. As ACE2 is expressed in testicular tissue, it has been speculated that SARS-CoV–2 may affect the male reproductive system. A cohort study including 38 male COVID–19 patients showed that SARS-CoV–2 was present in the semen of six patients (15.8%) [Li et al., 2020]. Later studies including a total of 223 patients have not provided evidence of transmission of SARS-CoV–2 via semen. There are to date no available longitudinal studies on semen quality following SARS-CoV–2 infection.

Study design, size, duration

Longitudinal cohort study including 50 non-hospitalized men from the general population in the Capital Region of Denmark. All participants had a confirmed SARS-CoV–2 infection by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on oropharyngeal swab material within the last week. The presence of SARS-CoV–2 in semen samples by RT-PCR, semen parameters and reproductive hormone profile were assessed at inclusion and at 3 + 6 months follow-up. SARS-CoV–2 antibody levels were assessed 3–5 weeks after inclusion.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

SARS-CoV–2-positive males (age 18–60 years) were included. Oropharyngeal and semen samples were tested by RT-PCR applying the E-Sarbeco primers and probe published by Corman et al. 2020 and adapted to TaqMan Fast Virus 1-step master mix and LightCycler 480 as previously reported by Jørgensen et al. 2020. SARS-CoV–2 antibodies were detected using the serological immunoassay from Shenzhen YHLO Biotech on the iFlash 1800. Semen quality parameters were analysed according to World Health Organisation (WHO) standards.

Main results and the role of chance

To date, 25 men with a mean age of 35 years have been included in the study. SARS-CoV–2 RNA could not be detected in the semen samples of any of the 25 men at the time of inclusion. Twenty-one of the 25 men (84,0%) had a same day RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV–2 infection in an oropharyngeal swab. RT-PCR cycle threshold (ct) values were distributed as follows: four (19,0%) were strongly positive (ct < 25), 16 (76,2%) intermediately positive (ct 25–35) and one (4,8%) weakly positive (ct 35–45). The four men without PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV–2 infection all had a positive IgG response to SARS-CoV–2 at the time of inclusion. Longitudinal semen and reproductive hormone profiles analyses will be performed. Further studies are needed to prove whether SARS-CoV–2 can be transmitted to the male reproductive tract and whether SARS-CoV–2 infection may cause alterations of spermatogenesis and endocrine function.

Limitations, reasons for caution

Strengths of this study are the unselected population of men examined within a week after confirmed SARS-CoV–2 infection and the follow-up of semen parameters and endocrine profile. Limitations are the limited sample size and the fact that semen quality was not known before the participants were diagnosed with COVID–19.

Wider implications of the findings: Knowledge of viral detection and semen persistence of SARS-CoV–2 is essential for clinical practice and public health. There is a need for evidence-based counselling on the impact of SARS-CoV–2 infection for patients undergoing assisted reproduction technology and patients who have a need for semen cryopreservation.

Trial registration number

H–20027362

P–493 Couples joint narratives of coping with and making sense of recurrent pregnancy loss: a dyadic interview study

Study question

What are couples’ joint narratives of coping with, and making sense of recurrent pregnancy loss?

Summary answer

Couples can become stuck in patterns of communication and coping roles that may be dissatisfying and not reflect the complexity of their experience of RPL.

What is known already

Fertility problems such as recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) are unique health issues because they are a couple problem, in that they involve a blocked parenthood goal for both members of the couple regardless of the cause or source of the fertility issue.

Previous research has focused on the psychosocial impact on the individual or examined gender differences in men and women’s response to RPL. Research suggests that couples’ relationships are impacted, but few examine this issue in interviews with couples as participants. We need appropriate study designs to examine and understand the couple’s experience and process on a dyadic level.

Study design, size, duration

This was a qualitative study using dyadic interviews and analysis. This method facilitates a co-construction of meaning and joint narrative between couples through sharing and comparing their experience in a conjoint dyadic interview.

Thirteen couples who were referred to the RPL program, in Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark were interviewed over a two-month period in 2017–2018. Interviews were held at Rigshospitalet and ranged between 81 and 109 minutes (average 91 minutes). Participants/materials, setting, methods: Inclusion criteria included: heterosexual couples with at least three pregnancy losses (PL) under 12 weeks gestation with no children/one child and willing to be interviewed in English. Thirty invitations were sent to couples who met the inclusion criteria and 15 couples contacted the interviewer to schedule an interview. Semi-structured dyadic interviews were conducted in person with 13 couples. Data was analyzed using dyadic analysis with a focus on common themes in co-constructed meaning across couples.

Main results and the role of chance

On average, participants had been in their relationship for 8.4 years, experienced three PLs (range three–six), with most recent PL occurring 4.3 months before the interview.

Couples described becoming stuck in patterns of communication and in rigid roles of coping and relating (e.g., the optimist, the emotional one) that could be dissatisfying and not meet their needs and not reflect the nuances and complexity of their experience of RPL. Common roles included the “optimist” versus the “pessimist”, the “talker” versus the “listener” and the “emotional” versus the “rational / problem solver”. While these roles were rooted in some truth of their experience, the rigidity of these roles did not create space and flexibility for the full spectrum of their reactions and experience. For example, a woman said, “I hope for him to be the pessimist so I get to be the optimist sometimes” and several men shared the depth of their grief for the first time.

The interviews were a way to highlight and create a new dynamic by allowing couples to respond to and correct their partner’s assumptions about their experience or role (e.g., “that’s not how I feel all the time”) and try new ways of communicating.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The findings cannot be generalized to all couples who have experienced RPL given the study design. Whilst dyadic interviews allow for a fuller, more nuanced narrative account, couples may omit some of their experience in the interview due to social desirability.

Wider implications of the findings: This study provides a better understanding of the complexity of communication patterns and roles in couples with RPL that can improve provision of support and counselling.

Dyadic interviews can provide opportunities for couples to communicate differently and break out of dissatisfying patterns while creating common ground and generating shared meaning.

Trial registration number

N/A

Feelings of guilt and loss of control dominate in stress and depression inventories from women with recurrent pregnancy loss

PURPOSE

Which feelings on the major depression inventory (MDI) and the perceived stress scale (PSS) are predominant among women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study of women with RPL referred to the tertiary RPL Unit at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, from 2010-2013. All women answered the MDI and PSS at time of referral.

RESULTS

In total, 298 women completed the MDI and the PSS, of which 162 had primary RPL and 136 secondary RPL. The most common feelings were low in energy (42%), loss of interest (35%), sadness (35%), and guilt (29%). Twenty-six (8.6%) women fulfilled the criteria for moderate to severe depression. Of the remaining 272 women, nine felt that life was not worth living. Among all women feeling angered of things outside their control (35%) and unable to control important things (27%) were predominant. Women with primary RPL compared to secondary RPL more often felt less self-confident and that life wasn't worth living (p = 0.007 and p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Feelings of guilt and loss of control were predominant in women with RPL. Women with primary RPL could represent a particularly sensitive group. Addressing these specific feelings could help treating the psychological aspects of RPL.