Abstract P1-11-05: Womens' opinion on when to start screening mammography and reasons for not undergoing screening

Background: In late 2009 significant controversy arose when some screening recommendations were changed to advocate screening mammography starting at age 50 rather than the long standing recommendation of starting at age 40 years. More recently some studies have called into question the benefit of screening mammography. The current study was performed to evaluate patients’ opinion on when women should start screening mammography and reasons for not undergoing screening.

Methods: Maricopa Medical Center is the safety net hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. 1,157 consecutive patients were seen at the Breast Clinic from May 2013 to May 2014. Sociodemographic variables were collected including health literacy assessment using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) validated screening instrument. Patients were asked when they felt women should start screening mammography. In addition, in women at least 40 years of age, if they did not undergo screening mammography, they were asked for the primary reason for not undergoing screening. Differences in patient characteristics were evaluated based on a Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for continuous variables.

Results: Thirteen of the 1,157 consecutive patients were male and excluded. The average age of the 1,144 consecutive female patients was 45 years. Most patients were Hispanic, underinsured, and had limited health literacy. Overall use of screening mammography was poor at only 24%. 402 women (35%) felt that age 40 years was the most appropriate time to start screening. Only 30 women (3%) felt that age 50 years was the most appropriate age. More women, 470 (41%), chose an age younger than age 40 to start screening. More than half (55%) of these women who chose an age 50 years or younger, however, did not undergo screening because they felt they had "no problems" or "didn’t know" they should get a mammogram despite choosing an age to start that was below their current age. Only 187 women (32%) cited cost as the reason for not undergoing screening. Other reasons for not undergoing screening were: physician did not recommend and other medical problems/forgot/too busy. Few patients (4%) cited problems with mammograms for not undergoing screening and none cited concerns about false positives. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with adequate health literacy and insurance were more likely to use screening mammography than patients who were uninsured or had limited health literacy. Family history of breast cancer was not associated with use of screening mammography.

Conclusions: Use of screening mammography was poor in this underinsured population. Most women felt that screening mammography should start at age 40 years or younger. More than half of women who did not undergo screening did not do so because they had "no problems" or "didn't know" they should. Although many women feel that screening should start at age 40, most women in this population do not understand the concepts of screening and early detection. Interventions to increase use of screening mammography should focus of the concept of screening as well as the age.

Citation Format: Ian K Komenaka, Meredith Heberer, Jesse Nodora, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Lisa Winton, Marcia Bouton, Maria Elena Martinez. Womens' opinion on when to start screening mammography and reasons for not undergoing screening [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-05.

Differentially expressed microRNAs in postpartum breast cancer in Hispanic women

The risk of breast cancer transiently increases immediately following pregnancy; peaking between 3-7 years. The biology that underlies this risk window and the effect on the natural history of the disease is unknown. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that have been shown to be dysregulated in breast cancer. We conducted miRNA profiling of 56 tumors from a case series of multiparous Hispanic women and assessed the pattern of expression by time since last full-term pregnancy. A data-driven splitting analysis on the pattern of 355 miRNAs separated the case series into two groups: a) an early group representing women diagnosed with breast cancer ≤ 5.2 years postpartum (n = 12), and b) a late group representing women diagnosed with breast cancer ≥ 5.3 years postpartum (n = 44). We identified 15 miRNAs with significant differential expression between the early and late postpartum groups; 60% of these miRNAs are encoded on the X chromosome. Ten miRNAs had a two-fold or higher difference in expression with miR-138, miR-660, miR-31, miR-135b, miR-17, miR-454, and miR-934 overexpressed in the early versus the late group; while miR-892a, miR-199a-5p, and miR-542-5p were underexpressed in the early versus the late postpartum group. The DNA methylation of three out of five tested miRNAs (miR-31, miR-135b, and miR-138) was lower in the early versus late postpartum group, and negatively correlated with miRNA expression. Here we show that miRNAs are differentially expressed and differentially methylated between tumors of the early versus late postpartum, suggesting that potential differences in epigenetic dysfunction may be operative in postpartum breast cancers.

Temporal resolution of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis with resumption of bromocriptine therapy for prolactinoma

•

IGM is becoming recognized more frequently.

•

Observation and patients with the natural history can be effective management.

•

Prolactin may be involved in the pathophysiology of IGM.

Introduction

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is becoming more commonly recognized and reported more often. Currently, many recommend corticosteroids in its management.

Presentation of case

A 34-year-old G3P2 Hispanic female, 28 weeks pregnant, presented with a 19 cm right breast mass. She had a known prolactinoma treated with bromocriptine which was discontinued during her pregnancy. Ultrasound guided core biopsy procedure revealed granulomatous mastitis. The patient was told that the mass would resolve with observation. The patient seen at another institution by an infectious disease specialist who started treatment with amphotericin for presumptive disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Repeated titers were negative for coccidioides antibody. Repeat cultures were negative as well. Due to the persistence of the infectious disease specialist, tissue cultures were performed on fresh tissue specimens, which did not grow bacterial, fungal, nor acid fast organisms. The amphotericin regimen resulted in no improvement of her breast mass after 10 weeks. Within two weeks of stopping the antifungal therapy, however, the mass diminished to 6 cm. The patient delivered at 39 weeks. Bromocriptine was restarted, and within 4 weeks, the lesion was no longer palpable. She had not shown signs of recurrence for 32 months.

Discussion

Treatment recommendations for IGM vary widely but antibiotics and antifungal medications are not recommended. Corticosteroid treatment is most commonly recommended, however, outcomes may not be different from management with observation. Prolactin may be involved in the pathophysiology of the process.

Conclusion

IGM is becoming recognized more frequently. Observation and patience with natural history can be an effective management.

Management of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis with observation

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is becoming more commonly recognized and reported more often. Currently, many recommend corticosteroids in its management.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2002 to June 2013. Data were collected regarding sociodemographic information, clinical history, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were found with IGM. Thirty-five patients were Hispanic born outside the United States. Early in the time period reviewed, 5 patients had masses excised and 5 patients were lost to follow-up. Twenty-seven cases of IGM resolved with observation. Corticosteroids were not used in the management. The average time to resolution was 7.4 months. Three patients (11%) had recurrent episodes after resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

IGM is a self-limited benign condition that will resolve spontaneously without treatment. Patience with the natural history of IGM is important, as the process often includes periods of exacerbation before resolution.

Family history of breast and ovarian cancer and triple negative subtype in hispanic/latina women

Familial breast and ovarian cancer prevalence was assessed among 1150 women of Mexican descent enrolled in a case-only, binational breast cancer study. Logistic regression was conducted to compare odds of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) to non-TNBC according to family history of breast and breast or ovarian cancer among 914 of these women. Prevalence of breast cancer family history in a first- and first- or second-degree relative was 13.1% and 24.1%, respectively; that for breast or ovarian cancer in a first-degree relative was 14.9%. After adjustment for age and country of residence, women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with TNBC than non-TNBC (OR=1.98; 95% CI, 1.26-3.11). The odds of TNBC compared to non-TNBC were 1.93 (95% CI, 1.26-2.97) for women with a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer. There were non-significant stronger associations between family history and TNBC among women diagnosed at age <50 compared to ≥50 years for breast cancer in a first-degree relative (P-interaction = 0.14) and a first- or second-degree relative (P-interaction = 0.07). Findings suggest that familial breast cancers are associated with triple negative subtype, possibly related to BRCA mutations in Hispanic/Latina women, which are strongly associated with TNBC. Family history is an important tool to identify Hispanic/Latina women who may be at increased risk of TNBC, and could benefit from prevention and early detection strategies.

Women's Impression of the Expected Breast Appearance and its Association with Breast Cancer Operations

BACKGROUND

Significant concern exists from clinicians in all fields that rates of bilateral mastectomy and prophylactic mastectomy are increasing. This study was performed to evaluate women's perception of breast appearance and its association with breast cancer operations.

METHODS

From April 2012 to May 2013, all women attending a breast clinic were shown two breast pictures, "natural" and "augmented," and asked which photograph represented the current expected appearance of breasts. Among breast cancer patients, the choice of breast cancer operation was correlated with picture selection.

RESULTS

Of 1,177 consecutive women, mean age was 45 years. Overall, 70 % of patients felt that the augmented appearance is expected. This impression was seen in all racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White 65 %, African American 67 %, Hispanic 71 %, and other groups 70 %. Younger age was strongly associated with the augmented appearance (p < 0.0001). Patients older than age 60 years selected the augmented appearance only 51 % of the time. This percentage increased with each younger decade with patients younger than 40 years selecting the augmented appearance in 85 %. Among breast cancer patients, augmented appearance selection was more likely for patients who underwent reconstruction (92 %; p < 0.001), as well as for those undergoing bilateral mastectomy (74 %; p = 0.057) compared with mastectomy alone (49 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Most women felt that the augmented appearance of breasts is currently expected, and this impression was more common in young women. This impression may be another factor contributing to the current trend of more extensive breast cancer operations and implant-based reconstructions.

Factors which affect use of breast conservation and mastectomy in an underinsured Hispanic population

BACKGROUND

Despite no difference in overall survival between breast conservation and mastectomy, significant variation exists between institutions and within populations. Less data exists about racial and ethnic minority populations. The current study was performed to evaluate variables that affect use of breast conservation and mastectomy in an underinsured Hispanic population.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients who self-identified as of Hispanic ethnicity and underwent breast cancer operations from July 2001 to February 2011 at a safety net hospital. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were evaluated. All patients with documented contraindications to breast conservation were excluded. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to identify variables which were associated with type of operation.

RESULTS

The average age of the 219 patients included was 50 years. Most of the patients (93%) were insured with Medicaid or uninsured and 59% presented with clinical stage 2A/B cancers. Mastectomy was performed in 33% of patients and 67% had breast conservation. In adjusted multivariate analysis higher pathologic stage (p=0.01) and English speakers (p=0.03) were associated with mastectomy. By contrast, higher BMI (p=0.03) and use of preoperative chemotherapy (p=0.01) were associated with breast conservation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this underinsured Hispanic population, patients with higher pathologic stage and English speaking patients were more likely to undergo mastectomy. Patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy and who had higher BMI were more likely to undergo breast conservation.

Family history and breast cancer subtype among women of Mexican descent

41

Background: A family history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative is associated with a 2-fold increase in breast cancer risk; however, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and there may be differences in risk profiles driven by tumor subtype or by racial/ethnic group. Methods: We assessed prevalence of familial breast cancer and its association with tumor subtype among 914 women with breast cancer of Mexican descent enrolled in the Ella Study, a case-only, binational (U.S.-Mexico) breast cancer study. Logistic regression was conducted to compare odds of triple negative breast cancers to non triple-negative breast cancers according to family history. Results: The prevalence of family history of breast cancer in a first- or second-degree relative was 24.1%, with 13.1% having an affected first-degree relative. Among participants who were diagnosed at age < 50, prevalence of family history of breast cancer in a first- or second-degree relative was 27.4%. After adjustment for age and country of residence, women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancers compared to non triple-negative breast cancers (OR = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.26-3.11). Similar results were seen for odds of triple-negative breast cancers compared to non-triple negative breast cancers for women with affected first- or second-degree relatives (OR=2.04; 95% CI, 1.40–2.98). The odds of triple-negative breast cancer compared to non-triple negative breast cancer was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.26–2.97) for women with first-degree relatives affected with breast or ovarian cancer. Conclusions: Findings suggest that familial cancers are most likely to be associated with triple negative subtype, supporting etiologic heterogeneity by tumor subtype in this population of Hispanic women. This association may be related to the prevalence of BRCA1 founder mutations in this population, which are strongly associated with triple-negative breast cancers. Identification of such differences in risk factors can help personalize screening and prevention approaches.

Reproductive and hormonal risk profile according to language acculturation and country of residence in the Ella Binational Breast Cancer Study

BACKGROUND

We compared the distribution of breast cancer reproductive and hormonal risk factors by level of acculturation and country of residence in women of Mexican descent.

METHODS

To compare the distribution of breast cancer reproductive and hormonal risk factors by level of acculturation and country of residence in women of Mexican descent, taking into account level of education, we analyzed data on 581 Mexican and 620 Mexican American (MA) women with a history of invasive breast cancer from the Ella Binational Breast Cancer Study. An eight-item language-based acculturation measure was used to classify MA women. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test associations between language acculturation, country of residence, and reproductive and hormonal risk factors.

RESULTS

After adjustment for age and education, compared to women residing in Mexico, English-dominant MAs were significantly more likely to have an earlier age at menarche (<12 years; odds ratio [OR]=2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-3.34), less likely to have a late age at first birth (≥30 years; OR=0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.97), and less likely to ever breastfeed (OR=0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in reproductive and hormonal risk profile according to language acculturation and country of residence are evident; some of these were explained by education. Results support continued efforts to educate Mexican and MA women on screening and early detection of breast cancer along with promotion of modifiable factors, such as breastfeeding.

Association between parity and obesity in Mexican and Mexican-American women: findings from the Ella binational breast cancer study

Obesity at diagnosis of breast cancer is associated with higher all-cause mortality and treatment-associated toxicities. We evaluated the association between parity and obesity in the Ella study, a population of Mexican and Mexican-American breast cancer patients with high parity. Obesity outcomes included body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m(2), waist circumference (WC) ≥35 in (88 cm), and waist-to-hip-ratio (WHR) ≥0.85. Prevalence of obesity ([BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) was 38.9 %. For WC, the multivariate odds ratio (OR) (95 % confidence interval [CI]) for having WC ≥ 35 inches in women with ≥4 pregnancies relative to those with 1-2 pregnancies was 1.59 (1.01-2.47). Higher parity (≥4 pregnancies) was non-significantly associated with high BMI (OR = 1.10; 95 % CI 0.73-1.67). No positive association was observed for WHR. Our results suggest WC is independently associated with high parity in Hispanic women and may be an optimal target for post-partum weight loss interventions.

Abstract P2-18-16: Patients’ impression of the expected appearance of breasts in 2013

Background: Concern exists about the increasing rate of bilateral mastectomy for patients with unilateral breast cancer. Patient concern for second primary, use of breast MRI, and increased genetic cancer risk assessment all may influence choice of operation. In recent years, cosmetic breast augmentation has also become more common. This study was performed to evaluate women's perception of the current expected appearance of breasts.

Methods: From April 2012 to May 2013, all patients seen at a Breast Clinic were shown two pictures (A “natural” and B “augmented”) and asked “What is the expected appearance of breasts in 2012(2013)?” Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were collected. Univariate analysis was performed to identify variables which were associated with picture choice. All of the variables with a p-value &lt;0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis.

Results: 1,177 consecutive patients were seen with mean age 45 years. 93% of the patients were insured with Medicaid or uninsured and 19% were non-Hispanic White (NHW). The mean monthly income was only $1104. Overall 70% of patients felt that the augmented appearance is “expected in 2013.” Age was strongly associated with augmented appearance as younger patients were significantly more likely to choose picture B: age less than 40 years (85%), age 40-49 years (67%), age 50-59 years (65%), and age 60+ years (51%). Patients of all race/ethnic groups felt that the augmented appearance was expected. NHW 65%, AA 67%, and Hispanic 71%. Multivariate analysis found that more years of education (p = 0.001), younger age and lower BMI were strongly associated (p &lt; 0.0001) with choosing the augmented appearance as “expected in 2013.”

Of the 1177 patients, 337 breast cancer patients were seen. Overall 62% felt that the augmented appearance was expected. Of those who underwent an operation, 178 (58%) patients underwent breast conservation and 62% felt the augmented appearance was expected. Of 128 patients who underwent mastectomy, 36 (28%) underwent reconstruction. 23 patients underwent bilateral mastectomy. Of those who underwent mastectomy alone (41/83 = 49%) only about half felt the augmented appearance was expected. By contrast those who underwent reconstruction (33/36 = 92%; p &lt; 0.001) or bilateral mastectomy (17/23 = 74%; p = 0.057), were significantly more likely than those who underwent mastectomy alone to feel the augmented appearance was expected.

Conclusions: The current study suggests women's perception of the expected appearance of breasts is changing. Younger age was strongly associated with the perception that the “augmented” appearance is expected. This change may affect patients’ choice in surgical operations with more mastectomies and reconstructions in the future. In October 2012 from a common women's periodical, when asked about her choice of operation for a small area of unilateral DCIS, one woman responded, “Just take them off and give me implants. Everybody has implants; it's no big deal.”

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-18-16.

Abstract P1-09-15: Perception of breast cancer risk in an underinsured safety net population

Background: Patient perception of breast cancer risk can affect compliance with screening mammography. In an underinsured population, we have previously found that being insured and adequate health literacy were strong predictors of use of screening mammography. Previous studies in other populations have found that patients with heighted perceived risk also have increased use of screening. Previous studies have found an average perceived risk of 30%. “Risk” and risk assessment are difficult concepts for many people and this may be problematic in undereducated populations. The current study was performed to evaluate women's perception of their lifetime risk of breast cancer in a safety net population.

Methods: From May 2012 to May 2013, all patients seen at a safety net Breast Clinic were asked to estimate their lifetime risk of breast cancer. “If 0 = no chance and 100% = for sure, what are your chances of getting breast cancer in your life?” Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were collected. Univariate analysis was performed to identify variables which were associated with picture choice. All of the variables with a p-value &lt;0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis.

Results: 1,089 consecutive patients were seen. After exclusion of men and patients known to have breast cancer, 838 patients were included. The mean age was 43 years. 93% of the patients were uninsured or insured with Medicaid. Average education 10 years and 17% were non-Hispanic White (NHW). Overall the average perceived lifetime risk for the population was 29.7%. For all patients age 35 years+, the average Gail model Risk Assessment scores were 1.1% (5 year) and 9% (LT). Only 17% of patients would be considered at increased risk according to Gail model 5 year risk (&gt; 1.6%).

In univariate analysis, continuous variables associated with higher perceived risk were higher BMI (p = 0.003), more years of education (p = 0.0009), and higher 5 year Gail model score (p = 0.0005). Categorical variables associated with higher perceived lifetime risk were being insured (34% vs 27%; p = 0.004) and NonHispanic patients (34% vs 27%; p = 0.003). Adequate health literacy (38% vs 27%; p = 0.0001) and family history of breast cancer in a first degree relative (FDR; 43% vs 27%; p = 0.0001) were the variables with the strongest association with perceived risk. In multivariate analysis after adjustment for the above factors, only family history in FDR remained significant (p = 0.003).

Over a similar time period, being insured (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.18 – 1.95; p = 0.001) and adequate health literacy (OR 3.75; 95% CI 2.71 – 5.19; p &lt; 0.0001) were the only variables significantly associated with the use of screening mammography.

Conclusions: Underinsured, minority women overestimate their lifetime risk of breast cancer (30%) at a magnitude similar to other populations. Family history has a strong influence on an underinsured populations’ perception of breast cancer risk. Patients who were insured or had adequate health literacy perceived a higher lifetime risk of breast cancer and were significantly more likely to use screening mammography.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-09-15.

Health literacy assessment and patient satisfaction in surgical practice

BACKGROUND

Individuals with limited health literacy have barriers to patient-physician communication. Problems in communication are known to contribute to malpractice litigation. Concern exists, however, about the feasibility and patient acceptance of a health literacy assessment. This study was performed to determine the feasibility of health literacy assessment in surgical practice and its effect on patient satisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN

Every patient seen in a Breast Surgery Clinic during a 2-year period was asked to undergo a health literacy assessment with the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) as part of the routine history and physical examination. During the year before routine NVS assessments and during the 2-year study period, all patients were asked to rate their "overall satisfaction with clinic visit" on a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

A total of 2,026 of 2,097 patients (96.6%) seen during the study were eligible for the health literacy assessment. Of those, no patients refused assessment, and only one patient was missed. Therefore, 2,025 of 2,026 eligible patients (99.9%) underwent the assessment. The average time for NVS assessment was 2:02 minutes. Only 19% of patients had adequate health literacy. Patient satisfaction ratings were slightly greater during the first year of the health literacy assessment (3.8 vs 3.7, P = .049) compared with the year prior to health literacy assessment and greater during the second year of health literacy assessment (4.1 vs 3.7, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Routine health literacy assessment is feasible in surgical practice and results in no decrease in patient satisfaction. In fact, satisfaction was greater during the years when health literacy assessments were performed.

Abstract B119: Presence of etiologic heterogeneity by breast tumor subtypes in Hispanic women with unique reproductive risk factor patterns

Background: Published data support the presence of etiologic heterogeneity by breast tumor subtype, but few studies have assessed this in Hispanic populations. Methods: We assessed tumor subtype prevalence and associations between reproductive factors and tumor subtypes in 1041 women of Mexican descent (559 U.S. and 482 Mexico) who participated in the Ella Binational Breast Cancer Study. Multinomial logistic regression comparing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive tumors (HER2+, regardless of ER or PR status) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) to hormone receptor positive (HR+) tumors was conducted. Results: A higher proportion of ER- tumors was shown for women in Mexico (40.5%) vs. those in the U.S. (27.2%) and slightly higher proportions of HR+ (61.2% vs. 57.9%) and HER2+ (23.8% vs. 20.3%) tumors were observed in the U.S. compared to Mexico. Prevalence of TNBC was 16.7% overall; the percentage was higher for Mexican vs. U.S. women (19.5% vs. 14.5%). After adjustment for age and country of residence, compared to women with HR+ tumors, those with a later age at first pregnancy were significantly less likely to have TNBC (odds ratio [OR]=0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.39-0.95), whereas those with ≥ 3 full-term pregnancies were significantly more likely to have TNBC (OR=1.68; 95% CI=1.10-2.55). Patients who reported breastfeeding for &gt;12 months were over twice as likely to have TNBC than HR+ tumors (OR=2.14; 95% CI=1.24–3.68). A lower odds of TNBC was shown for longer menstruation duration, whether prior to first pregnancy (OR=0.78; 95% CI= 0.65–0.93 per 10 years) or prior to menopause (OR=0.79; 95% CI, 0.69–0.91 per 10 years). Associations comparing HER2+ to HR+ tumors were weak or non-existent except for the interval between last full-term pregnancy and breast cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Findings show etiologic heterogeneity by tumor subtype in a population of Hispanic women with a unique reproductive profile. Given that Hispanic women have higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality than non-Hispanic whites, our findings add to growing evidence of opposing effects of reproductive factors on breast tumor subtypes, which may partly explain disparities in outcomes.

Citation Format: Maria Elena Martinez, Betsy Wertheim, Loki Natarajan, Richard Schwab, Melissa Bondy, Adrian Daneri-Navarro, Maria Mercedes Meza-Montenegro, Luis Enrique Gutierrez-Millan, Abenaa Brewster, Ian K. Komenaka, Patricia A. Thompson. Presence of etiologic heterogeneity by breast tumor subtypes in Hispanic women with unique reproductive risk factor patterns. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Genetics, Biology, and Clinical Applications; Oct 3-6, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2013;11(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B119.

Reproductive factors, heterogeneity, and breast tumor subtypes in women of mexican descent

BACKGROUND

Published data support the presence of etiologic heterogeneity by breast tumor subtype, but few studies have assessed this in Hispanic populations.

METHODS

We assessed tumor subtype prevalence and associations between reproductive factors and tumor subtypes in 1,041 women of Mexican descent enrolled in a case-only, binational breast cancer study. Multinomial logistic regression comparing HER2(+) tumors and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to luminal A tumors was conducted.

RESULTS

Compared with women with luminal A tumors, those with a later age at first pregnancy were less likely to have TNBC [OR, 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.95], whereas those with three or more full-term pregnancies were more likely to have TNBC (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.10-2.55). A lower odds of TNBC was shown for longer menstruation duration, whether before first pregnancy (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93 per 10 years) or menopause (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91 per 10 years). Patients who reported breastfeeding for more than 12 months were over twice as likely to have TNBC than luminal A tumors (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.24-3.68). Associations comparing HER2(+) with luminal A tumors were weak or nonexistent except for the interval between last full-term pregnancy and breast cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings show etiologic heterogeneity by tumor subtype in a population of Hispanic women with unique reproductive profiles.

IMPACT

Identification of etiologically distinct breast tumor subtypes can further improve our understanding of the disease and help provide personalized prevention and treatment regimens.

Hypothesized role of pregnancy hormones on HER2+ breast tumor development

Breast cancer incidence rates have declined among older but not younger women; the latter are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancers carrying a poor prognosis. Epidemiological evidence supports an increase in breast cancer incidence following pregnancy with risk elevated as much as 10 years post-partum. We investigated the association between years since last full-term pregnancy at the time of diagnosis (≤10 or >10 years) and breast tumor subtype in a case series of premenopausal Hispanic women (n = 627). Participants were recruited in the United States, Mexico, and Spain. Cases with known estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status, with one or more full-term pregnancies ≥1 year prior to diagnosis were eligible for this analysis. Cases were classified into three tumor subtypes according to hormone receptor (HR+ = ER+ and/or PR+; HR- = ER- and PR-) expression and HER2 status: HR+/HER2-, HER2+ (regardless of HR), and triple negative breast cancer. Case-only odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for HER2+ tumors in reference to HR+/HER2- tumors. Participants were pooled in a mixed-effects logistic regression model with years since pregnancy as a fixed effect and study site as a random effect. When compared to HR+/HER2- cases, women with HER2+ tumors were more likely be diagnosed in the post-partum period of ≤10 years (OR = 1.68; 95 % CI, 1.12-2.52). The effect was present across all source populations and independent of the HR status of the HER2+ tumor. Adjusting for age at diagnosis (≤45 or >45 years) did not materially alter our results (OR = 1.78; 95 % CI, 1.08-2.93). These findings support the novel hypothesis that factors associated with the post-partum breast, possibly hormonal, are involved in the development of HER2+ tumors.

Abstract PD08-04: Factors which affect surgical management in an underinsured, county hospital population

Background: Significant variation exists between institutions in the use of lumpectomy, mastectomy, and reconstruction. Much less is known about minorities and populations outside the large academic institutions. The current study was performed to evaluate variables that affect patient choice in surgical management in a county hospital population.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients seen at the county, safety net institution with breast cancer from January 2010 to May 2012. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify variables which were associated with type of operation. All of the variables with a p-value &lt;0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis.

Results: 403 patients were seen with mean age 53 years. 92% of the patients were insured with Medicaid or uninsured and 29% were non-Hispanic White. Only 20% of patients underwent screening mammography and therefore presentation with palpable, Stage 2A/B cancer was most common (46%). 54 patients presented with T4 tumors and 13 (24%) were found to have metastases. Only 2 of 340 (0.6%) patients who presented at Stage 3A or earlier presented with metastatic disease. Patients with operable cancer underwent lumpectomy in 65%, mastectomy in 26%, and 9% mastectomy with reconstruction. With respect to breast conservation vs mastectomy, in adjusted analysis, married patients (OR 2.59, p = 0.003) and patients with larger tumors (p = 0.003) were more likely to undergo mastectomy, while patients who were Hispanic (OR 0.38, p = 0.004), underwent preoperative chemotherapy (OR 0.25, p = 0.002), or had their operation by breast surgical oncologist (OR 0.30, p = 0.005) were more likely to undergo breast conservation. When patients who underwent mastectomy alone were compared to those who underwent reconstruction, unadjusted analysis suggested that reconstruction patients were more likely to speak English, have adequate health literacy (HL), lower clinical stage, and be seen by a breast surgical oncologist. Adjusted analysis demonstrated that having been seen by a breast surgical oncologist (OR 18.4, p = 0.007), younger age (p = 0.05) and adequate HL (OR 3.13, p = 0.06) were associated with likelihood of reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone.

Conclusions: Breast conservation and mastectomy with reconstruction can be achieved in a significant proportion (74%) of underscreened and underinsured patients. Patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy were more likely to undergo breast conservation. Younger patients and patients with adequate HL were more likely to choose reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients treated by breast surgical oncologists were more likely to have breast conservation or mastectomy with reconstruction. Even in an underscreened population, presentation with metastatic disease is uncommon in patients with operable breast cancer.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD08-04.

Factors that influence mammography use and breast cancer detection among Mexican-American and African-American women

OBJECTIVE

This study examined factors that influence mammography use and breast cancer detection, including education, health insurance, and acculturation, among Mexican-American (MA) and African-American (AA) women.

METHODS

The study included 670 breast cancer cases (388 MAs and 282 AAs), aged 40-86 years at diagnosis. Data on mammography use, detection, and delay in seeking care were collected via questionnaires and medical records. Using a language-based bidimensional acculturation measure, MAs were classified as English-dominant (n = 67), bilingual (n = 173), and Spanish-dominant (n = 148). Mammography prior to diagnosis was assessed by racial/ethnic acculturation subgroup using logistic regression.

RESULTS

In age-adjusted models, mammography use was non-significantly lower among English-dominant (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.45-1.59) and bilingual (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.55-1.35) MAs and significantly lower among Spanish-dominant MAs (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34-0.83) than among AA women. After adjustment for education or insurance, there was no difference in mammography use by race/ethnicity and acculturation subgroup. Despite high self-reported mammography use (75%), a large proportion of cases reported self-detection (59%) and delay in seeking care >90 days (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings favor promoting culturally appropriate messaging about the benefits and limitations of mammography, education about breast awareness, and prompt reporting of findings to a health professional.

Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the re-excision lumpectomy rate in patients with palpable breast cancers

Positive margins occur in 15 to 69 per cent of patients undergoing lumpectomy. The current study was performed to evaluate intraoperative ultrasound in patients undergoing lumpectomy for palpable breast cancer. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with palpable cancer who underwent lumpectomy with intraoperative ultrasound from 2004 to 2009. Each patient was matched with two patients who underwent lumpectomy alone over the same time period. Matching criteria included tumor size, clinical stage, body mass index, age at diagnosis, and lymphovascular invasion or extensive intraductal component. Twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent lumpectomy with intraoperative ultrasound were matched with 44 patients who underwent lumpectomy without intraoperative ultrasound. In addition to matching criteria, the patients were similar with respect to ethnicity, insurance status, weight, predominant histology, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her2 status. Patients who underwent lumpectomy with intraoperative ultrasound were significantly less likely to have an involved margin (41 vs 9%, P = 0.01) and less likely to require a re-excision (34 vs 9%, P = 0.04). The lumpectomy volumes in the intraoperative ultrasound group were smaller than the volumes in the lumpectomy alone group. Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the rate of positive margins and re-excision lumpectomy in patients with palpable breast cancers.

An alternative technique for immediate breast reconstruction

Immediate reconstruction has demonstrated superior cosmesis compared with delayed reconstruction, however, unexpected final pathology may necessitate post mastectomy radiation. We describe an alternative technique for immediate breast reconstruction. Twelve patients underwent 14 skin-sparing mastectomies from July 2006 to December 2009. The skin-sparing mastectomies and sentinel node biopsies were performed through a periareolar incision. At the completion of the operation the incision was closed in a transverse fashion. No simultaneous reconstruction was performed. No drains were placed. After 3 days seroma developed, which maintained the integrity of the skin envelope and appearance of a breast. Nine patients (75%) had a contraindication to breast conservation. All patients were clinically node negative and 67 per cent were clinical stage 0. The majority (75%) experienced an adverse change from clinical stage to final pathologic stage. Four patients (33%) required postmastectomy radiation. The mean time from oncologic procedure to initial reconstruction procedure was 14 days. Two patients (17%) developed postoperative infections. This technique allows immediate reconstruction and avoids the fear of adverse final pathology indicating radiation to the reconstructed breast. In addition, it provides flexibility in scheduling for the surgeons and allows the patient to maintain the appearance of the breast.

An Alternative Technique for Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Immediate reconstruction has demonstrated superior cosmesis compared with delayed reconstruction, however, unexpected final pathology may necessitate post mastectomy radiation. We describe an alternative technique for immediate breast reconstruction. Twelve patients underwent 14 skin-sparing mastectomies from July 2006 to December 2009. The skin-sparing mastectomies and sentinel node biopsies were performed through a periareolar incision. At the completion of the operation the incision was closed in a transverse fashion. No simultaneous reconstruction was performed. No drains were placed. After 3 days seroma developed, which maintained the integrity of the skin envelope and appearance of a breast. Nine patients (75%) had a contraindication to breast conservation. All patients were clinically node negative and 67 per cent were clinical stage 0. The majority (75%) experienced an adverse change from clinical stage to final pathologic stage. Four patients (33%) required postmastectomy radiation. The mean time from oncologic procedure to initial reconstruction procedure was 14 days. Two patients (17%) developed postoperative infections. This technique allows immediate reconstruction and avoids the fear of adverse final pathology indicating radiation to the reconstructed breast. In addition, it provides flexibility in scheduling for the surgeons and allows the patient to maintain the appearance of the breast.

Intraoperative Ultrasound Can Decrease the Re-excision Lumpectomy Rate in Patients with Palpable Breast Cancers

Positive margins occur in 15 to 69 per cent of patients undergoing lumpectomy. The current study was performed to evaluate intraoperative ultrasound in patients undergoing lumpectomy for palpable breast cancer. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with palpable cancer who underwent lumpectomy with intraoperative ultrasound from 2004 to 2009. Each patient was matched with two patients who underwent lumpectomy alone over the same time period. Matching criteria included tumor size, clinical stage, body mass index, age at diagnosis, and lymphovascular invasion or extensive intraductal component. Twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent lumpectomy with intraoperative ultrasound were matched with 44 patients who underwent lumpectomy without intraoperative ultrasound. In addition to matching criteria, the patients were similar with respect to ethnicity, insurance status, weight, predominant histology, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her2 status. Patients who underwent lumpectomy with intraoperative ultrasound were significantly less likely to have an involved margin (41 vs 9%, P = 0.01) and less likely to require a re-excision (34 vs 9%, P = 0.04). The lumpectomy volumes in the intraoperative ultrasound group were smaller than the volumes in the lumpectomy alone group. Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the rate of positive margins and re-excision lumpectomy in patients with palpable breast cancers.

Preoperative chemotherapy for operable breast cancer is associated with better compliance with adjuvant therapy in matched stage II and IIIA patients

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) for operable breast cancer has shown significant benefits in prospective trials. Many patients are treated in the community setting and some may question the applicability of PC outside the university setting.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of stage II and IIIA breast cancer patients treated from January 2002 to July 2009. Fifty-three of 57 patients who underwent PC were matched based on age, tumor size, and hormone receptor status with 53 patients who did not undergo PC. Differences in patient compliance with physician recommendations for all types of adjuvant therapy were evaluated. Crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios derived from conditional logistic regression models were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 106 patients included. Patient compliance with chemotherapy was better in the PC group than in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group (100% versus 70%; p = .0001). Similarly, more patients in the PC group completed radiation therapy (96% versus 65%; p = .0003) and initiated hormonal therapy (100% versus 62%; p = .0001). Conditional logistic regression revealed that higher pathologic stage and current cigarette smoking were associated with poorer compliance with chemotherapy. For radiation therapy, the univariate model revealed that compliance with chemotherapy and being employed were associated with completion of radiation, whereas current cigarette smoking and larger pathologic size were associated with poorer compliance with radiation. For hormonal therapy, current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with initiation of hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PC for operable breast cancer can improve patient compliance with chemotherapy. Current cigarette smokers were more likely to be noncompliant with all types of adjuvant therapy.

Preoperative chemotherapy for operable breast cancer improves surgical outcomes in the community hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) for operable breast cancer has demonstrated significant benefits in clinical trials. Many patients are treated in the community setting and some may question the applicability of PC outside the university setting. The potential benefits of PC in terms of surgical outcomes in a community practice were examined.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of stage II and stage IIIA breast cancer patients from January 1, 2002 to July 31, 2009. Surgical outcomes of margin status, volume of lumpectomy, rate of lumpectomy, and re-excision lumpectomy were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 212 patients included. Seventy-nine percent of patients who underwent PC had a clinical response and 25% had a pathologic complete response. For clinical stage T2 and stage T3 tumors, the PC group underwent lumpectomy more often than patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group (78% versus 50%; p = .016 and 60% versus 29%; p = .015, respectively). The rate of close or positive margins in the PC group was half the rate in the AC group (23% versus 46%; p = .04) and this resulted in fewer re-excisions (p = .01). The volume of tissue removed was also smaller in the PC group (143.6 cm³ versus 273.9 cm³; p = .003). Conclusions. PC for operable breast cancer can significantly improve surgical outcomes in community-based practice.