Biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the older adult: Complex decisions for complex patients

295

Background: BTC is an uncommon malignancy. Complex patient (pt) factors potentially determine treatment choices in older pts and may independently impact outcomes.

Methods: Between 2000 and 2010, 133 pts aged ≥ 75 years with BTC were evaluated at Princess Margaret Hospital. Clinical and histopathological characteristics, geriatric-specific factors, and survival outcomes were studied in a retrospective analysis.

Results: Median age was 79 years (range 75-93). Predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (95%). 31 pts (23%) had curative surgery, 4 (13%) had additional (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) ± radiation therapy (RT). Pathological staging included: I/II: 20 (65%); III: 6 (19%); IV: 5 (16%). 25 pts (19%) received CT ± RT alone, 4 (15%) had stage I/II and 21(84%) stage III/IV disease. 77 pts (58%) received best supportive care (BSC) alone. Radiological complete or partial response was noted for 33% of pts treated with CT [gemcitabine (gem) alone 48%; gem doublet 52%]. 24% pts discontinued CT with toxicity. Untreated pts had greater degrees of functional dependence and poorer social supports. Of those untreated, the risk of treatment was felt to outweigh potential benefit given age ± comorbidities in 17%. In 22%, the pt opted not to receive treatment. Median overall survival was 19.7 months for the surgical group, 12.3 mths for the CT ± RT group and 4.37 mths for the BSC group.

Conclusions: Untreated BTC has a poor prognosis. Factors other than clinicopathological features may impact treatment decisions. Integrating geriatric assessements into the evaluation of this vulnerable patient group may help better guide treatment choices.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of ABT-869 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Interim analysis

4581

Background: ABT-869 is a novel orally active, potent and selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet derived growth factor families of receptor tyrosine kinases. Results of an interim analysis of a phase 2 trial of ABT-869 in HCC are presented. Methods: An open-label, multicenter phase II trial (M06–879) of oral ABT-869 at 0.25 mg/kg daily in Child-Pugh A (C-PA) or QOD in Child-Pugh B (C-PB) patients (pts) until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, is ongoing. Key eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic HCC; up to one prior line of systemic treatment; and at least one measurable lesion by computed tomography (CT) scan. The primary endpoint was the progression free (PF) rate at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). CT scans were assessed centrally and by the investigators; presented results are from central assessment. Results: 44 pts were enrolled from 09/07 to 08/08 at 6 centers internationally, with interim data available for 34 pts. There were 28 C-PA pts (median age, 63.5 y [range, 20- 81]) and 6 C-PB pts (median age, 64.5 y [range, 36–69]) and 73.5% received no prior systemic therapy. For the 19 evaluable C-PA pts included in the per-protocol interim analysis, 8 (42.1%) were progression free at 16 weeks [95% CI 20.3, 66.5]. The estimated ORR was 8.7% [95% CI, 1.1, 28] for the 23 C-PA pts and 0% for the 2 C-PB pts who had at least one post-baseline CT scan reviewed by central imaging. For all 34 pts, median TTP was 112 d [95% CI, 110, -], median PFS was 112 d [95% CI, 61, 168] and median OS was 295 d [95% CI, 182, 333]. The most common adverse events (AEs) for all pts were hypertension (41%), fatigue (47%), diarrhea (38%), rash (35%), proteinuria (24%), vomiting (24%), cough (24%) and oedema peripheral (24%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs for all pts were hypertension (20.6%) and fatigue (11.8%). Most AEs were mild/moderate and reversible with interruption/dose reductions/or discontinuation of ABT-869. Conclusions: ABT-869 appears to benefit HCC patients, with an estimated TTP of 112 days and an acceptable safety profile. Updated results from this ongoing study will be presented.

[Table: see text]

Adjuvant sunitinib following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for esophageal cancer: A phase II trial

e15550

Background: Locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) has a 5-year survival of < 30 %. Most patients (pts) fail after curative intent tri-modality treatment with distant metastatic disease. This phase II trial aims to determine if adjuvant targeted therapy, after neoadjuvant CRT plus surgery for resectable LAEC, may impact on systemic disease without significant toxicity. Methods: Pts with LAEC of the thoracic esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, ECOG PS 0,1 and surgical candidates treated with: preoperative Irinotecan (65mg/m2 initially, ammended to 50mg/m2) + Cisplatin (30mg/m2) on weeks 1,2,4,5,7,8 + concurrent conformal radiotherapy (50Gy/25 fractions) on weeks 4–8. Esophagectomy during weeks 15–18. Sunitinib 37.5mg daily (escalating to 50mg daily if tolerated) commenced 4–12 weeks post surgery, for 1 year. Primary endpoint is feasibility and efficacy of adjuvant sunitinib. Planned sample size 36pts. Results: 30pts enrolled from 11/06 to 12/08. Median age 64 yr (43–71), male: 22, adenocarcinoma: squamous 22:6; 10 pts stage IIA, 5 IIB and 13 III. 2 pts excluded with positive PET scan. 28 pts completed CRT - 18 pts (64%) received ≥80% of planned chemotherapy dose, 23 pts (82%) received full radiation dose. Grade 3/4 toxicity included: neutropenia (17/28), diarrhea (7/28), dehydration (4/28), febrile neutropenia (FN) (3/28) and nausea (2/28). 2 deaths on chemotherapy (1 bacterial meningitis, 1 FN) leading to irinotecan dose- reduction. Dysphagia improved in 14/23 pts during CRT. 18 pts have undergone esophagectomy. Complete pathological response in 4 (22%), downstaging in 3 (17%), stable disease in 11 (61%). 2 pts unresectable (metastases at laparotomy). 1 post-operative death due to pulmonary embolus. 9 pts have commenced sunitinib, 6 maintained at starting dose of 37.5mg; 2 dose reductions; 1 discontinued with poor wound healing. Grade 3 toxicity included: leukopenia (2/9), hand-foot reaction (1/9) and depression (1/9). Conclusions: In LAEC, induction Irinotecan/Cisplatin and radiotherapy followed by esophagectomy is associated with a significant but manageable toxicity profile. Early initiation of sunitinib is feasible and well-tolerated. Updated results to be presented.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of single agent abraxane as second-line therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

e16058

Background: Metastatic urothelial cancer progressing on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is incurable and has a very poor prognosis. There is no standard second-line therapy, but the taxanes including paclitaxel, have previously shown activity. Abraxane (ABI-007) is a novel well tolerated albumin-bound nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of single agent Abraxane in the second-line metastatic urothelial cancer setting. Methods: Patients with measureable metastatic urothelial cancer, who progressed on or after first-line cisplatin based chemotherapy were enrolled onto this phase II, two-stage multicenter trial. Patients received Abraxane 260 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Clinical evaluation, CBC and blood chemistries were performed every cycle and restaging CT scans every 2 cycles. Results: Fourteen patients have been enrolled to date. Patient demographics: M: F 12:2; mean age 64 (range 45–80); ECOG 0:1:2 4:5:5. A total of 57 cycles, avg 4 cycles/ patient (range 1–9) have been administered. There were three dose delays due to neuropathy, pain, and low neutrophil count respectively. There were two dose reductions due to fatigue and neuropathy. Most frequent adverse events (AE) were fatigue, alopecia, anorexia, cough and joint pain; the most frequent grade 3+ AE were fatigue, joint pain, hypertension, joint stiffness and back pain. Fourteen patients are currently evaluable for best response using RECIST criteria. There have been 5 partial responses (PR), 5 stable disease (SD) and 4 progressive disease (PD). Conclusions: Single agent Abraxane was well tolerated in the 2nd line, cisplatin refractory/resistant metastatic urothelial cancer setting. Preliminary efficacy results are encouraging with a clinical benefit rate of 71% (10 out of 14 evaluable pts having either SD or PR). Stage 1 response criteria have been met and accrual is ongoing to a total of 48 patients.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Failure of initial VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): What next?

5098

Background: The characterization and efficacy of second-line targeted therapy in patients with metastatic RCC who failed first-line VEGF-targeted therapy in a population-based setting is of clinical relevance but remains to be assessed. Methods: Provincial registries and clinical databases from seven cancer centers (3 in US and 4 in Canada) identified patients with mRCC who received first-line anti-VEGF targeted therapy between 2005–2007. Patient characteristics, data on second-line therapy and outcomes were analyzed. Results: 645 patients with mRCC who received initial VEGF-targeted therapy were identified (sunitinib, sorafenib or bevacizumab) and had a median follow-up of 25 mos. Of these, 218 patients (34%) received second-line targeted therapy: the median age was 62 yrs (range, 41–87), median KPS was 90%, 90% had prior nephrectomy, 3.8% had non-clear cell histology, 5.8% had brain metastases and 79% had > 1 metastatic site. Second-line therapy included anti-VEGF agents (sunitinib n = 93, sorafenib n = 80, bevacizumab n = 11, axitinib n = 8) and mTOR-inhibiting agents (temsirolimus n = 21, everolimus n = 3). Patient characteristics were similar aside from more non-clear cell histology in patients receiving second-line mTOR-inhibiting agents (14% vs 3% p = 0.045). On multivariable analysis, only a higher baseline KPS score prior to first-line therapy predicted which patients were more likely to receive second-line therapy (p < 0.0001). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) of second-line therapy was 4.9 mos for anti-VEGF therapy and 2.5 mos for mTOR inhibitors (p = 0.014). After adjusting for MSKCC prognostic profile (favorable, intermediate, poor), the hazard ratio for TTF was 0.52 (95%CI:0.29–0.91) in pts receiving anti-VEGF therapy. Overall survival from start of second-line therapy was not different between anti-VEGF or anti-mTOR drugs (14.2 vs 10.6 respectively; p = 0.38). 70 patients (10%) received third-line therapy. Conclusions: Baseline KPS is an independent predictor of receiving second-line targeted therapy. Patients who receive a second-line anti-VEGF drug appear to have a longer TTF than those who receive a second-line anti-mTOR drug. However, patient selection may account for this finding and overall survival was not significantly different. Results of ongoing randomized trials are awaited.

[Table: see text]

The effects of sorafenib and sunitinib on bone turnover markers in patients with bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma

e16145

Background: Bone metastases (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are common and associated with poor outcomes. While the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI's) sunitinib and sorafenib have advanced the treatment of metastatic RCC, their efficacy on BM is unknown. Urinary N-telopeptide (uNTX) is a marker of bone turnover measured in nmol/mmol creatinine. Elevated uNTX levels correlate with an increased risk of skeletal related events and mortality in patients receiving bisphosphonates for BM from a range of primaries. In this pilot biomarker study we sought to prospectively evaluate the effects on BM of these multi-TKI's in RCC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had advanced RCC, at least one BM evident on imaging and no bisphosphonate exposure within 4 weeks. UNTX levels (OsteoMark) were measured at; baseline and weeks-1, 4, 8 and 12 after commencing either sunitinib or sorafenib. The primary endpoint was the percentage change (Ch) in uNTX levels from baseline. Serum samples were also collected for KIT and VEGFR-2 (Quantikine). Patients also completed pain (including bone pain) and quality of life questionnaires. Results: The uNTX results on the first 9 patients are presented in the table below (7 received sunitinib and 2 sorafenib). In this group, sVEGFR-2 and sKIT levels fell by week-1 and 4 respectively and at week-12 the mean % changes (95% CI) were -34% (-0.53,-0.14) and -38% (-0.58,-0.18). Conclusions: In patients with BM from RCC and at least moderately elevated uNTX levels at baseline, these multi-TKI's show a significant trend to decrease uNTX levels, but perhaps not as effectively as bone-specific therapies (e.g. bisphosphonates) do in other malignancies. SVEGFR-2 and sKIT levels also fell across the patient group over the same period. This pilot data raises questions about the activity of the multi-TKI's in BM from RCC and further research is needed. [Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents: Results from a large multicenter study

5041

Background: Prognostic factors (PF) for OS have yet to be fully defined for patients with metastatic RCC in the era of VEGF-targeted therapy. This study identifies PFs in this population and updated survival and validation results are presented. Methods: Baseline characteristics and outcomes on anti-VEGF-naïve metastatic RCC patients were collected from three US and four Canadian centers. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, 3 risk categories for predicting survival were identified on the basis of 6 pretreatment clinical features. Results: Six-hundred forty-five patients were included. The median (m) OS was 22 months (95% CI: 20.0–24.8) with a median follow-up of 25 months. Patients were treated with sunitinib (n = 396), sorafenib (n = 200) or bevacizumab (n = 49); 33% had prior immunotherapy. Four of the five PFs previously identified by MSKCC were independent predictors of short survival, including hemoglobin below the lower limit of normal (LLN) (p < 0.0001), corrected calcium above the upper limit of normal (ULN) (p = 0.0006), Karnofsky performance status <80% (p < 0.0001) and time from initial diagnosis to initiation of therapy ULN (pULN (p = 0.012) were independent adverse PFs. Patients were assigned one point for each poor PF and were segregated into three risk categories: favorable-risk (0 PFs, n = 133) median OS (mOS) 37.0 months; intermediate-risk (1 - 2 PFs, n = 292) mOS 28.5 months; and poor-risk (3–6 PFs, n = 139) mOS 9.4 months (log rank p < 0.0001). This model produced a c-index of 0.74 and the bootstrap procedure confirmed good internal validity. The discriminatory ability of the model and its parameter estimates were not affected after adjusting for prior use of immunotherapy or the type of anti-VEGF drug used. Conclusions: These data validate components of the MSKCC model with the addition of platelet and neutrophil counts. This model derived from a large population can be incorporated into patient care and clinical trials of VEGF-targeted agents.

[Table: see text]

The Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (ARCCS) expanded access trial: Long-term outcomes in first-line patients (pts)

5096

Background: Sorafenib (SOR) doubled median progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in a phase III study (TARGETs) for previously treated pts with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We report on pts who had not received any prior systemic anti- cancer therapy (1st line) for advanced RCC from the ARCCS program in the US and Canada, which enrolled a broad range of pts. Methods: Pts received SOR 400 mg bid in the ARCCS open-label, nonrandomized treatment protocol if they were =15 years old with advanced (unresectable, recurrent or metastatic) RCC and had ECOG PS 0–2. In the US, ARCCS enrollment ended with SOR approval in 12/05, and pts were transitioned to commercial drug with 1st line pts being eligible for an additional 6-mo follow-up in an extension protocol (EP); Canadian enrollment completed in 8/06. Response evaluation (baseline and =1 post-baseline radiologic assessment) was conducted every 4 wks in the main study and every 8 wks during the EP. Pts without a confirmatory scan were classified as unconfirmed PR. The primary efficacy analysis on PFS was pre-specified to be performed only on the EP-enrolled pts. Results: Of the 2,488 pts valid for safety in ARCCS, nearly 50% were 1st line (n=1239) of which 69% were male with median age 65 yrs; 77% had prior nephrectomy and 29% had prior radiotherapy. Time from diagnoses to treatment was <1 yr for 52% and =1 yr 36% in these 1st line pts. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events with >2% incidence included hand-foot skin reaction 7.7%, fatigue 4.7%, hypertension 3.8%, rash/desquamation 5.2%, dehydration 2.9, diarrhea and dyspnea 2.6%. Confirmed responses are reported in the table ; 15% had unconfirmed PRs. For the 224 1st line pts enrolled in the EP, median PFS was 35.1 wks (95% CI; 32.7, 41.9). Conclusions: SOR toxicity in 1st line pts appeared similar to that in both overall and 2nd line populations previously reported in the phase III study. The PFS among patients enrolled in the EP is encouraging, but may be biased by low enrollment and selection for non-progressors.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

The Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (ARCCS) expanded access trial in North America: Safety and efficacy

5011

Background: A prior phase III trial (TARGETs) demonstrated that sorafenib (SOR) doubled median progression-free survival versus placebo in previously treated clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC) patients (pts). The ARCCS trial made SOR available to a broader range of RCC pts through an expanded access program. Methods: This open-label, nonrandomized trial enrolled pts with advanced RCC not eligible for, or without access to, other SOR clinical trials; ECOG PS 0–2 with waivers granted for pts with ECOG PS 3–4; age =15 yrs; and adequate prior treatment of brain metastases. Major exclusion criteria included treatment <4 wks prior, life expectancy <2 mos, uncontrolled hypertension, and severe renal impairment requiring dialysis. Objectives were to analyze the safety and efficacy (response by RECIST) of 400 mg bid SOR in a community-based setting. Enrollment ceased on 12/20/05 when SOR became commercially available in the US, and those with no prior therapy or non-clear cell RCC continued in an extension protocol. Enrollment completed in Canada in 8/06. Results: A total of 2488 pts were valid for safety: 69% male with median age 63 yrs and most (83%) had prior nephrectomy; histologies included 78% clear-cell, 7% papillary, 1% chromophobe, and <1% collecting duct and oncocytoma. Median time from diagnosis for all pts was 1.4 yrs (range <1–34). Of those pts receiving prior therapy (n=1249), treatments included interferon alfa (54%), interleukin 2 (43%), bevacizumab (23%), thalidomide (12%), and sunitinib (2%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurring in > 2% pts were hand- foot skin reaction 7.2%, fatigue 5.3%, hypertension 4.4%, rash/desquamation 4%, dehydration and dyspnea 2.7%, and diarrhea 2.5%. Efficacy assessment, mainly PFS, was limited by the short median time (14 wks) on study due to many pts enrolling during the last 2 months of the study. Of 1,850 pts evaluable for response, 17.5% had unconfirmed PR. One (0.1%), 67 (3.6%), 1479 (79.9%) and 303 (16.4%) had CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively. Conclusions: ARCCS pts were representative of the broader range of RCC pts in the community including those excluded from previous SOR trials. Toxicity and response rates were similar to those reported previously, supporting the generalizability of the phase III trial data.

[Table: see text]

Phase I study of stereotactic radiotherapy for unresectable hepatobiliary cancer and liver metastases

4590

Background: Safety of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and liver metastases (LM) has not been well established. Results from a phase I study of 6 fraction SRT are reported. Methods: Eligible patients had unresectable or medically inoperable HCC, CC or LM, liver enzymes < 6 fold higher than normal, platelets > 80,000 bil/L, Child score A, > 800 cc uninvolved liver, KPS = 60 and unsuitability for standard therapies. Patients were treated with breath hold and image guided 6 fraction SRT. Dose was individualized to maintain the same risk of liver toxicity at three risk levels (I-5%, II-10%, III-20%). Escalation to level II and III occurred once at least 3 patients had been followed for >3 months without dose limiting toxicity (grade 4/5 < 1 month or grade 4/5 liver < 3 months) for each stratum. Stratification was based on diagnosis and liver volume irradiated (low <20%, mid 20–50%, high 50–80%). Results: From Aug. 2003 to Dec. 2006, 82 patients initiated SRT. Two patients discontinued SRT after 1 fraction for progressive disease (LM) and a variceal bleed (HCC). 80 patients completed SRT (38 LM, 32 HCC, 10 CC). Median age was 64 years (38–92 years). Median tumor volume was 293 cc (3–3088 cc). 24 patients (30%) had extra-hepatic disease. 17 HCC patients had portal vein thrombosis (53%), 14 HBV, 12 HCV and 4 alcoholic cirrhosis. The median prescribed dose was 40 Gy (24 Gy - 60 Gy) in 6 fractions. Within 3 months post SRT, no dose-limiting grade 4/5 toxicity or classic radiation liver toxicity was observed. Grade 3 liver enzymes (2 new, 9 pre-existing), thrombocytopenia (3), nausea (3) and fatigue (1) was observed. Child score declined in 8 patients (5 HCC, 2 CC, 1 LM), 6 with progressive disease. Late toxicity included 1 tumor-duodenal fistula, 1 bowel obstruction and 2 GI bleeds. The in-field response rate was 60% (LM 57%, CC 50%, HCC 67%): CR 14%, PR 46%, SD 23%, PD 17%. Actuarial 12 month local control was 78% (95% CI: 58- 90%). The median survival for LM, CC and HCC was 16.6 months (7.9–25.6), 13.1 months (6.0–28.4) and 11.0 months (8.6–20.8) respectively. Conclusions: Individualized SRT is a safe, promising treatment for unresectable liver cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic renal cancer (MRC) in the real world: The Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) experience

15568

Background: Sorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, prolonged progression free survival (PFS) of MRC patients (pts) in second line when compared to placebo in a phase III trial (Escudier at al ECCO 2005). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) were reported in 12% of pts. Here we present sorafenib’s efficacy and safety in a less selected cohort of pts enrolled in the Bayer Expanded Access Program at PMH. Methods: Pts with MRC received Sorafenib 400 mg bid continuously until disease progression (PD) and/or clinical deterioration..Tumor response was measured by RECIST criteria. AE were graded by NCI common toxicity criteria. Summary statistics and logistic regression were used to describe the results. Results: From Nov 2005 to Aug 2006, 58 pts were enrolled: median age was 59 years (range 14–86), 47 (81%) were male, 48 (83%) had clear cell histology and 46 (79%) received Sorafenib in first line. None received prior kinase-inhibitors. Using the Motzer Prognostic Index, 29 pts (50%) were low risk, 21 (36%) intermediate and 8 (14%) poor risk. Grade 3/4 AE occurred in 37 pts (64%, 95% CI 50–76%): 15 (26%) pts had skin rash, 10 (17%) hand-foot syndrome, 4 (7%) hypertension, 4 (7%) fatigue, and 4 (7%) diarrhea. Thirty-six (62%) pts required dose reductions and/or treatment interruptions, most due to skin reactions and hand-foot syndrome. Median follow-up was 9 months (IQR range 2–11), the median PFS was 7.5 months (IQR range 5.4–11.3), and the best responses among 56 evaluable pts were: 10 (17%) confirmed partial responses (median duration: 6 months, range 4–11), 14 (24%) stable diseases for = 6 months and 10 (18%) early progression. Pts with bony mets progressed earlier than pts without bony mets. Abnormal creatinine clearance, age, performance status, line of treatment and presence of significant comorbid conditions were not associated with grade 3/4 AE in univariate analysis. Conclusions: Sorafenib is effective in a ”real world”, less selected patient population with MRC but leads to more toxicity than described previously.

[Table: see text]

Transarterial chemoembolisation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from a North American cancer centre

AIMS

In Asian countries, transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) has long been used for palliation of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without strong evidence of improved survival or quality of life. In 2002, a survival benefi of TACE was shown in two randomised controlled trials in Europe and Hong Kong. The effectiveness of interventions fo HCC is influenced by geographical factors related to diverse patient characteristics and protocols. Therefore, the validation of TACE as palliative modality for unresectable HCC requires confirmation in diverse patient populations. The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of TACE for HCC in a North American population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single centre prospective cohort study. Child-Pugh A cirrhosis or better patients wit unresectable HCC and without radiological evidence of metastatic disease or segmental portal vein thrombosis wer assessed between November 2001 and May 2004. Of 54 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria, 47 underwent 80 TACE sessions. Chemoembolisation was carried out using selective hepatic artery injection of 75 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and lipiodol followed by an injection of embolic particles when necessary. Repeat treatments were carried out at 2-3 month intervals for recurrent disease. The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes were morbidity and tumour response.

RESULTS

The survival probabilities at 1, 2 and 3 years were 76.6, 55.5 and 50%, respectively. At 6 months after the first intervention, 31% of patients had a partial response and 60% had stable disease by RECIST criteria. Minor adverse events occurred after 39% of TACEs and major adverse events after 20% of sessions, including two treatment-related deaths (4% of patients). One patient had complete cancer remission after undergoing three TACE treatments. Further progression of tumour growth was prevented in 91% of tumours at the 6 month point after the first TACE. At 3 months, serum levels of the tumour marker alpha-feto protein were significantly reduced in patients with elevated levels before TACE.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival probabilities at 1 and 2 years after TACE were comparable with results in randomised studies from Europe and Asia. Most patients tolerated TACE well, but clinicians need to be aware that moderately severe sideeffects require close monitoring and prompt intervention.

A phase II trial of oblimersen sodium (G3139) in combination with doxorubicin (DOX) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NCI protocol # 5798

14072

Background: Advanced HCC is refractory to most standard forms of chemotherapy, however responses to DOX are seen. The bcl-2 protein confers resistance to apoptosis in cancer cells and is important in tumor progression and resistance to chemotherapy. The bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide, G3139 (G), has been shown to enhance the activity of DOX in tumor models by blocking bcl-2 synthesis. This argues for evaluating G + DOX in combination in HCC. By decreasing tumor bcl-2 protein levels, HCC may be sensitized to the apoptotic effects of DOX. Methods: We completed a phase II trial evaluating treatment with G at 7 mg/ kg for 7 days cont. i.v. infusion (d1–8) plus DOX at 45 mg/m2 i.v. bolus d5, every 28 d (as determined from our phase I HCC study). Eligible patients (pts) had path-confirmed, measurable, advanced HCC. Minimal eligibility included Childs-Pugh A cirrhosis, adequate hematological (hem) parameters and ECOG PS <2. Tumor biopsies for correlative studies were obtained at baseline and cycle 1 d 4 in consenting pts. Results: 19 patients were accrued, 1 was ineligible, 18 evaluable for toxicity, 17 evaluable for response; receiving a median (med) of 2 cycles (range 1,10). Risk for HCC was 39% HBV, 22% HCV, 17% alcohol, 22% other. Most common toxicities were hem and could be attributed to both G+DOX and to G alone. Overall grade 3–4 toxicities seen were: ANC- 67% (med nadir d 24–25), lymphopenia - 44%, thrombocytopenia - 6%, transaminitis - 33% and grade 1–2 G-fever - 67%. No responses were seen and the trial was stopped at stage 1. Six patients (35%) had stable disease, with one pt completing 10 cycles as per protocol (pt # 22). Med TTP is 1.8 months (1.7-NA) and 6-month PFS is 17.2% (5.3–56.4). 18 of 19 pts have died with med OS of only 5.4 months (2.7–11.6). Correlative studies on 3 available pts’ paired tumor biopsies showed absent baseline bcl-2 expression but moderate expression of both bcl-xl and BAX protein and with no change after exposure to G (includes pt #22). Conclusions: G + DOX is inactive in HCC at this dose and schedule. The overlap of hem toxicity may have resulted in suboptimal DOX dosing in HCC. Low baseline bcl-2 tumor expression relative to bcl-xl seen may suggest a relative insensitivity to the effects of bcl-2 inhibition in these HCC tumors.

[Table: see text]