AB0264 1-YEAR RESULTS OF A NON-INVASIVE AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION DEVICE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Despite the clinical benefits of current pharmacological treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there remains an unmet need for alternative treatment approaches. Initial results of a 12-week proof-of-concept study of non-invasive, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve from a wearable device to treat RA showed the device to be well-tolerated with significant reductions in the DAS28-CRP and RA disease severity1.

Objectives:

This analysis presents data from the 9-month extension of the original proof-of-concept study.

Methods:

Following the completion of the 12-week proof-of-concept study, responding patients (defined as achieving a reduction in DAS28-CRP of ≥1.2 from baseline and/or achievement of ACR20) were given the option to enroll in a 9-month extension study. Use of the wearable device continued daily for up to 30 minutes as in the first 12 weeks of the study. Alteration of baseline medication and addition of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs were allowed during the extension phase.

Results:

20/27 patients who completed the initial 12-week study met the enrollment criteria for the extension phase; 19 of those patients consented to participate. 4/19 patients (21%) discontinued the extension study due to lack of efficacy (1 patient after 1 month, 2 patients after 3 months, and 1 patient after 6 months in the extension); 15 patients completed the extension phase. 2/15 patients (13%) added biologic therapy to their treatment regimen. Mean DAS28-CRP reduction from baseline to the end of the extension (12 months total) in all patients completing the extension was 2.23 (95% CI: -1.60, -2.86). For patients who did and did not add biologic therapy, mean DAS28-CRP reduction was 2.98 and 2.11, respectively. Individual DAS28-CRP reductions are shown in the figure 1. Mean HAQ-DI reduction from baseline to the end of the extension in all patients was 0.70. 2 non-device related adverse events were reported in the study extension: one related to cornea transplant and one related to dysesthesia. No serious adverse events were reported during the study extension phase.

Conclusion:

Benefits from the use of the wearable device were maintained over longer periods of time from the initial 12-week proof-of-concept study, with few safety concerns as no additional side effects were observed.

References:

[1]Marsal S et al. Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Signs and Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Pilot Study [in press]. The Lancet Rheumatol, 2021

Disclosure of Interests:

Sara Marsal Speakers bureau: BMS, Pfizer, UCB, Celgene, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, Celgene, Galapagos, MSD, UCB, BMS, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, Celgene, MSD, UCB, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Sanofi, Héctor Corominas: None declared, Juan Jose de Agustin: None declared, Carolina Perez-Garcia: None declared, Maria Lopez Lasanta: None declared, Helena Borrell Paños: None declared, D Reina-Sanz: None declared, Raimón Sanmartí: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Clara Franco-Jarava: None declared, Charles Peterfy Speakers bureau: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Consultant of: Multiple companies on behalf of Spire Sciences Inc., Jose Antonio Narvaez: None declared, Vivek Sharma Shareholder of: Nēsos Corp, Employee of: Nēsos Corp, Konstantinos Alataris Shareholder of: Nēsos Corp, Employee of: Nēsos Corp, Mark C. Genovese Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Nēsos Corp, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Matthew Baker Shareholder of: Nēsos Corp, Consultant of: Nēsos Corp

A prospective study of lung disease in a cohort of early rheumatoid arthritis patients

Lung disease is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The onset of lung involvement in RA is not well known. The objective is to describe the features and evolution of lung involvement in early RA, its relationship with disease activity parameters, smoking and treatments. Consecutive patients with early RA without respiratory symptoms were included and tracked for 5 years. Lung assessment included clinical, radiological and pulmonary function tests at diagnosis and during follow-up. Peripheral blood parameters (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide autoantibodies) and scales of articular involvement, such as DAS28-CRP, were evaluated. 40 patients were included and 32 completed the 5-year follow up. 13 patients presented lung involvement in the initial 5 years after RA diagnosis, 3 of them interstitial lung disease. Significant decrease of diffusion lung transfer capacity of carbon monoxide over time was observed in six patients, 2 of them developed interstitial lung disease. DLCO decrease was correlated with higher values of CRP and ESR at diagnosis. Methotrexate was not associated with DLCO deterioration or lung disease development. Subclinical progressive lung disease correlates with RA activity parameters. Smoking status and methotrexate were not associated with development or progression of lung disease.

SAT0133 PILOT CLINICAL STUDY OF A NON-INVASIVE AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION DEVICE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Despite the clinical benefit of current pharmacological treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there remains an unmet need for alternative treatment approaches. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) via an implanted device has been shown to attenuate RA disease severity in patients resistant to therapy,1as evidenced by a reduction in the DAS28-CRP score following a month of daily stimulation.

Objectives:

This pilot study investigated the safety and efficacy of a wearable (non-invasive) device that attaches to the outer ear to treat RA via electrical stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve.

Methods:

Patients with active RA (≥4 tender/swollen joints based on a 28-joint count, Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) >3.8, active synovitis detected on ultrasound and MRI) and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), or csDMARD and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), were enrolled in this open-label study. Patients used the device for up to 30 minutes daily over the course of the 12-week study. The primary endpoint was the change in DAS28-CRP score at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included a safety analysis, proportion of patients achieving ACR20/50/70, the mean change in HAQ-DI and the proportion of patients achieving a HAQ-DI MCID of at least 0.22 over 12 weeks. Additionally, sleep scores were assessed using a visual analogue scale (0-100) at baseline and 12 weeks.

Results:

Thirty patients with active RA were enrolled, of which 27 patients completed the 12-week protocol. Three patients dropped out of the study: two patients decided to seek other treatment and one patient moved out of the country. Data for three additional patients was not included in this dataset as it was still being collected. Of the 24 patients with complete 12-week datasets, 88% were female, the average age was 54.9 years, mean disease duration was 7.3 years, and four patients had an inadequate response to one or two bDMARDs.

The mean change in DAS28-CRP from baseline to Week 12 was -1.43 (p<0.05; Figure 1) and ACR20/50/70 response rates were 58.3%, 37.5%, and 16.7%, respectively (Figure 2). HAQ-DI change from baseline was -0.50 (p<0.05) at 12 weeks, and 15 out of 24 patients achieved an overall HAQ-DI reduction of 0.22 (62.5%). VAS sleep scores were significantly improved over the 12-week study. Scores for trouble falling asleep, awakened by pain at night, and awakened by pain in morning decreased by 64%, 70%, and 60%, respectively (p<0.05, n = 23). Three study adverse events (AEs) were reported: two device related AEs due skin irritation at the earpiece insertion site and one AE due to mucous accumulation in the throat.

Figure 1Figure 2

Average DAS28-CRP is shown for each study visit. Error bars indicate standard error of mean. Percentage of subjects meeting ACR20/50/70 at 12 weeks.

Conclusion:

In this pilot study, auricular stimulation was well tolerated and daily use over 12 weeks attenuated RA disease severity. Further evaluation in larger controlled studies are needed to confirm whether a non-invasive wearable device might offer an alternative approach for the treatment of RA.

References:

[1]Koopman FA, et al. (2016) Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2016; 113: 8284–9.

Disclosure of Interests:

Sara Marsal: None declared, Héctor Corominas Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Maria Lopez Lasanta: None declared, D Reina-Sanz: None declared, Carolina Perez-Garcia: None declared, Helena Borrell Paños Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, MSD and Janssen, Raimón Sanmartí Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, BMS, Roche and Pfizer, J. Narváez: None declared, Clara Franco-Jarava: None declared, Jose Antonio Narvaez: None declared, Juan Jose de Agustin: None declared, Vivek Sharma Shareholder of: Vorso Corp., Konstantinos Alataris Shareholder of: Vorso Corp., Mark C. Genovese Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GSK, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., RPharm, Sanofi Genzyme, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GSK, Novartis, RPharm, Sanofi Genzyme, Matthew Baker Consultant of: Gilead, Vorso, Paid instructor for: Gilead

AB0593 DOES REALLY EXIST MIXED CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE?

Background:

Currently, most authors accept that mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is an independent entity, although there are those who argue that it is actually an overlap syndrome or an undifferentiated early phase of another systemic autoimmune disease (SAD).

Objectives:

To analyze the long term evolution of a serie of patients with MCTD.

Methods:

Observational, retrospective and multicenter study in patients with MCTD (diagnostic criteria of Alarcón-Segovia et al),followed for a minimun of 2 years.

Results:

Fifty-five patients (49 women) with a median age at diagnosis of 38±14 years and with a follow up time (median) of 101 months (range, 24-237 months with a total of 501.2 pacients-year) were identified.

At the end of the follow-up period, only 27% (15/55) of the patients kept on fulfilling MCTD criteria. In the remaining 73% (40), 40% (22) had been differentiated to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 13% (7) to systemic sclerosis (SSc) and 20% (11) developed an overlap syndrome [SSc+SLE in 8 cases and SSc+rheumatoid arthritis (AR) in 3]. In 8% of these patients, a secondary Sjögren’s syndrome was diagnosed during the follow-up period. The average score in patients who met the EULAR/ACR 2013 criteria for SSc was 11 (minimum 9 - maximum 16) and the average time elapsed from the diagnosis of MCTD to meet SSc criteria was 64.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 25-75%: 10-127 months).

Applying the 2012 SLICC criteria, only 24 patients of those initially diagnosed as MCTD ended up meeting SLE criteria. The average score in these patients was 5.6 (4-9) and the average time elapsed from the diagnosis of MCTD unltil fulfilling the SLICC criteria was 39 months (IQR 25-75%: 6-28). When we apply the new ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria, the percentage of patients who meet SLE criteria increased to 30%, with an average score of 17.3 (10-38). The average time elapsed since the diagnosis of MCTD until meeting the new SLE criteria was reduced to 17 months (IQR 25-75: 0-10).

In the multivariate study, the presence of sclerodactyly (OR: 2.91; IC 95% 1.90 - 4.1, p= 0.001) and esophageal involvement (OR: 2.05; IC 95% 1.14–3.66, p=0.016) were associated with the evolution to SSc. Any predictor of evolution to SLE was identified.

Conclusion:

Only slightly more than a quarter of patients initially diagnosed as MCTD maintain this diagnosis during the follow-up. The majority, ended up evolving towards to another SAD, fundamentally SLE and SSc. The new ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria seems to be more sensitive than the SLICC 2012 criteria for diagnose SLE in these patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

L Montolio-Chiva: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Maria Pascual: None declared, Hye Sang Park: None declared, Ana V Orenes Vera: None declared, Eduardo Flores: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Iván Castellví: None declared, Joan Miquel Nolla: None declared

SAT0075 ABATACEPT IN COMBINATION WITH METOTREXATE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ASSOCIATED TO INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE: NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 263 PATIENTS

Background:

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is an extra-articular complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conventional disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate (MTX) have been implicated in the development and exacerbation of a pre-existing ILD.

Objectives:

The aim of our study was to check the influence of combined MTX treatment in patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept (ABA).

Methods:

National multicentre retrospective registry of 263 patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA. RA was diagnosed according to the ACR classification criteria of 1987 or by the EULAR/ACR criteria of 2010. ILD was diagnosed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). In this study we have done a subanalysis of the 46 patients treated with ABA in combination with MTX (ABA+MTX) vs. 217 patients treated with ABA in monotherapy or in combination with other synthetic DMARDs. Efficacy was evaluated according to the following parameters: a) Dyspnoea (MMRC) considering variations ≥ 1; b) Lung function test (LFT) considering variations ≥ 10% in FVC and a variation of DLCO ≥ 10%; c) Imaging test (HRCT) d) DAS28 score e) prednisone dose. Variables were collected at the beginning of the study and at months 3, 6, 12 and then every 12 months until a maximum of 60 months.

Results:

263 patients with ILD associated with RA were included in the study with mean age 64.64±10 years. RF or CCPA were positive in 235 (89.4%) and 233 (88.6%) cases, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months. Baseline characteristics of both groups are shown in table 1, while data obtained during evolution of this complication are presented in Figure 1.

Conclusion:

Despite the baseline differences of both groups, the good evolution in the ABA+MTX subgroup suggests that this therapeutic strategy can be a safe combination for patients with RA-ILD.

ABA with MTX (n=46)ABA w/t MTX (n=217)PSex (F/M)28/18122/950.625Age (years)65.11±10.216.2±9.80.202RF/CCPA + (%)91.3/91.389.8/90.10.810Smoking or past smoking (%)47.855.10.417Follow-up (months)22.73±18.0022.3±20.850.916DAS28 at baseline4.08±1.514.61±1.470.056DAS28 at last visit3.00±1.463.13±1.310.642Prednisone at baseline, median (IQR) (mg)5 (5-7.5)7.75 (5-15)0.008*Prednisone at the end of study, median (IQR) (mg)5 (1-5)5 (5-7.5)0.032*DLCO at baseline (%)66.85±19.0465.43±18.210.823DLCO at the end of study (%)66.05±20.9565.17±19.720.831FVC at baseline (%)90.06±17.7785.40±21.560.164FVC at the end of study (%)90.58±15,4584.21±21.490.038*

Disclosure of Interests:

Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.

, CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD

SAT0523 BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN REFRACTORY ATYPICAL OPTIC NEURITIS. MULTICENTER STUDY

Background:

Optic Neuritis (ON) is an inflammation of the optic nerve. Its most common presentation is demyelinating typical ON. Atypical ON is rare, severe, non-demyelinating and can be isolated or associated to different diseases including autoimmune diseases. If it is not treated, it can lead to devastating visual results. Conventional treatment includes systemic corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressants (CIS).

Objectives:

Our aim was to assess the efficacy of biological therapy in atypical ON refractory to conventional treatment.

Methods:

Open-label multicenter study including 19 patients diagnosed with atypical ON refractory to systemic corticosteroids and at least one CIS. The main outcomes assessed were Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and optic nerve and ganglionar cells Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). These outcome variables were recorded at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months and 1 year after biological therapy onset.

FIGURE

Results:

We studied 19 patients (12 women/7 men); mean age of 34.8 ± 13.9 years. The underlying diseases were idiopathic (n=7), Behçet´s disease (n=5), systemic lupus erythematosus (n=2), neuromyelitis optica (n=3), sarcoidosis (n=1) and relapsing polychondritis (n=1)(TABLE).Before biological therapy and besides systemic corticosteroids, patients had received different CIS. Biological therapy was adalimumab (n=6), rituximab (n=6), infliximab (n=5) and tocilizumab (n=4). After biological therapy, an improvement in ocular parameters was observed: BCVA [0.7±0.3 to 0.8±0.3; p= 0.03], optic nerve OCT [123.2±58.3 to 190.5±175.4; p= 0.11], and ganglionar cells OCT [369.6±137.4 to 270.7±23.2; p= 0.03] at one year(FIGURE). After a mean follow-up of 29.1 ±19.2 months, there were no severe adverse effects observed.

Conclusion:

Biological therapy may be effective in patients with refractory atypical ON.

TABLECaseGender/ AgeUnderlying diseaseLateralityIV steroids dose (g)Maximum prednisone oral dose (g)Conventional immunosuppressantsBiological therapyAdverse effects1F/29IdiopathicUnilateral460AZATCZNo2F/26IdiopathicBilateral5.530AZATCZNo3F/13IdiopathicBilateral-10MTXADANo4F/25IdiopathicBilateral460MTXIFX, TCZNo5F/24IdiopathicBilateral0.560MTX, AZAADANo6M/14IdiopathicBilateral-10MTXADANo7F/30Vasculitis ANCA+Unilateral360AZA, MMF, LFM, CFMRTXYes8M/21BehçetBilateral-60MTX, AZAADANausea Vomits9M/25BehçetUnilateral0.560MTX, CyAADANo10M/39BehçetUnilateral380MTX, MMFIFXNo11M/40BehçetUnilateral-80MMFIFXNo12M/37BehçetUnilateral-60CyAIFXNo13F/68NMOUnilateral2.530CFM, AZARTXNo14F/41NMOUnilateral360CFMRTXInfection15F/43NMOBilateral560AZARTXInfusion reaction16F/56SLEUnilateral-60HCQ, MMF, CFMRTXNo17F/47SLEUnilateral560HCQ, MMFRTXNo18F/43Relapsing polychondritisBilateral360MTX, CFMIFX, TCZNo19M/41SarcoidosisBilateral340AZAADANo

Disclosure of Interests:

Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Carmen Álvarez Reguera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, Olga Maíz Alonso: None declared, Ana Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, J. Narváez: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Esther Vicente Speakers bureau: BMS, Roche., Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Rosalía Demetrio-Pablo: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, J. L. García Serrano: None declared, J. L. Callejas Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Paula Estrada: None declared, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, David Martínez-López: None declared, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD

AB0163 ANTI-KU ANTIBODIES: MUCH MORE THAN SCLEROMYOSITIS

Background:

Initially, anti-Ku antibodies (Ab) were described in patients with overlap syndrome with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and inflammatory myophaty (scleromyositis), although later they have been linked to a wide variety of systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD) questioning its diagnostic value. Recently, the possible existence of 2 different clinical phenotypes associated with these Ab has been described: one with myositis and high risk of intersticial lung disease (ILD) and another with positive anti-dsDNA Ab and glomerulonephritis.

Objectives:

To analyze the clinical relevance and the main diagnosis of a serie of patients with positive anti-Ku Ab.

Methods:

Descriptive observational study of patients with anti-Ku Ab in two third level hospitals between 2011 and 2019. Their determination was made at the criteria of the requesting physician.

Results:

Twenty-three patients (20 women) with a median age of 59 ± 14 years (range, 24-83) and a follow up time (median) of 37 months (1-208) were identified. The main clinical and analytical characteristics, as well as the final clinical diagnosis of these patients are shown in Table 1. In the cluster analysis we could not identify clinical phenotypes, perhaps because of the small sample size. Only 50% of patients with myositis developed ILD. Regarding the final diagnosis, only 1 patient (5%) was diagnosed of scleromyositis. Besides detecting them in patients with SSc (39%) and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (9%), anti-Ku Ab were detected in other SAD, the most frequent were systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and overlap syndrome of SSc + RA.

Table 1.

Main clinical-analytical manifestations and final diagnosis of pacientes with anti-Ku Ab.

FINAL CLINICAL DIAGNOSiSScleromyositis: 1Idiopahtic inflammatory myopathy: 1Systemic sclerosis (SSc): 6 (Pre-scleroderma: 3, limited SSc: 3).Systemic lupus erythematosus: 2Rheumatoid arthritis: 2Overlap syndrome RA + limited SSc: 2Primary Sjögren’s syndrome: 1 (Secondary Sjögren’s syndrome: 3)Mixed connective tissue disease: 1Polymyalgia rheumatica: 1Undifferentiated connective tissue disease: 1Acute hepatitis due to HEV: 1Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ITP): 1Drug-induced fibrosing ILD: 1Systemic graft versus host disease (GVHD) in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received and autologous haematopoietic progenitor transplant: 1Primary biliary cirrhosis: 1CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS(patients could have more than one):Raynaud’s phenomenon: 61% (14/23).Inflammatory arthralgia/arthritis: 52% (12).Lung involvement: 30.5% (7: NSIP 3, UIP 2, other patterns 2).Serositis: 26% (6: pericarditis 4, pleuritis 1, pleuropericarditis 1).Cardiac involvement: 26% (6: PHT by echocardiogram 3, myocarditis 2, arrhytmia 1).Dry syndrome: 17% (4)Myositis: 17% (4).Esophageal involvement: 17% (4).Autoimmune cytopenias: leucolinfopenia: 17% (4) / thrombocytopenia: 13% (3).Telangiectasias: 13% (3).Photosensitivity: 13% (3).Other: non-androgenic alopecia: 9% (2); sensory-motor polyneuropathy: 4.5% (1);Puffy hands: 4.5% (1); fever: 4.5% (1); lymphadenitis: 4.5% (1); cold sores: 4.5% (1), and retinal hemorrhage: 4.5% (1).OTHER ASSOCIATED ANTIBODIES:ANA: 91% (21/23)anti Ro60/SSA Ab: 30.5% (7)Anti Ro52 Ab: 30.5% (7)Anti RNP Ab: 22% (5)Anti-dsDNA: 17% (4)Anti-La/SSB Ab: 17% (4)Anticentromer Ab: 17% (4)Anti Mi-2 Ab: 13% (3)Other: anti Sm Ab: 9% (2); anticardiolipin Ab(IgG): 4.5% (1); PM/Scl: 4.5% (1); nucleosomes: 4.5% (1); Scl70: 4.5% (1); PL12: 4.5% (1); anti-U1-RNP: 4.5% (1) and NOR90: 4.5% (1).

Conclusion:

Anti-Ku Ab are related to a great variety of SAD, without being a specific marker of any of them, nor being associated with any specific clinical manifestation. We couldn’t confirm the existence of clinical phenotypes associated with the presence of these antibodies.

Disclosure of Interests:

L Montolio-Chiva: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Francisco Morandeira: None declared, Jordi Bas: None declared, Carla Marco: None declared, Xavier González: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Eduardo Flores: None declared, I Vázquez-Gómez: None declared, Jose María López: None declared, Joan Miquel Nolla: None declared

THU0297 SERIOUS INFECTIONS IN 134 PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS WITH TOCILIZUMAB IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. FREQUENCY, TYPE AND CLINICAL ASSOCIATIONS

Background:

Infections are the most common adverse event of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). In GiACTA study(1),serious infections were observed in 7% (9.6/100 patient-years) of patients who received TCZ weekly. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are conducted under highly standardized design excluding some real-world patients. Therefore, adverse events may be underestimated in RCTs. In our series of real-life, serious infections occurred in 11.9% (10.6/100 patient-years)(2).

Objectives:

In a wide series of GCA of clinical practice treated with TCZ, we assess the frequency, type and predisposing factors of serious infections.

Methods:

Multicenter study of 134 patients diagnosed with GCA, all of them refractory to conventional therapy, treated with TCZ. Serious infection was considered when a life-threatening infection, fatal, or requiring hospitalization occurred, intravenous antibiotics were required, or the infectious process led to persistent or significant disability.

Results:

16 of 134 (11.9%, 10.6/100 patient-years) patients developed serious infections during follow-up. The most frequent infections were pneumonia (n=4), urinary tract infection (n=4), and facial herpes zoster (n=2). At TCZ onset, serious infections were more frequent in older patients (74.3±9.6 vs 72.9±8.7 years), with a longer GCA evolution (20 [4.3-45.6] vs 13 [5-29.3] months), with visual manifestations (43.75% vs 17.8%) and a higher dose of prednisone at TCZ onset (30.4±15.5 vs 21.1±16.1 mg/day) (TABLE). Presence of comorbidities were similar in both groups. 13 of the 16 patients who had infections received a dose of prednisone greater than 15 mg/day (16.3/100 patient-years) compared to 3 patients under treatment with less than 15 mg/day of prednisone (4.2/100 patient-years).

Conclusion:

The age, GCA duration, ocular involvement and the dose of glucocorticoids, at TCZ onset, seem to be predisposing factors related to an increased risk of developing serious infections in GCA patients.

References:

[1]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-28.

[2]Calderón-Goercke M et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019 Aug;49(1): 126-135.

TABLESERIOUS INFECTIONS(n=16)WITHOUT SERIOUS INFECTIONS(n=118)pBASAL FEATURES AT TCZ ONSETGENERAL FEATURES Age, years, mean± SD74.3±9.672.9±8.70.552 Sex, female/male n(%)13/388/300.760 Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]20[4.3-45.6]13[5-29.3]0.604COMORBIDITIES Hypertension, n(%)9(56)86(73)0.551 Diabetes, n(%)3(19)39(33)0.677 Chronic kidney disease, n(%)3(19)27(23)0.512CLINICAL FEATURES OF GCA PMR, n(%)9(56.25)64(54.2)0.879 Aortitis, n(%)5(31.25)53(45)0.301 Visual manifestations, n(%)7(43.75)21(17.8)0.017CORTICOSTEROIDS AT TCZ ONSET Prednisone dose mg/d, mean (SD)30.4±15.521.1±16.10.031

Disclosure of Interests:

Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elena Becerra-Fernández: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, E. Galindez: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, MSD, UCB, Pfizer, Menarini, Grunenthal, Gebro, Novartis, Janssen, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Catalina Gomez-Arango: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Alejandro Olive: None declared, María Álvarez del Buergo: None declared, Luisa Marena Rojas: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Francisco Navarro: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Arantxa Conesa: None declared, Carlos Vázquez: None declared, Jose Andrés Román-Ivorra: None declared, Pau Lluch: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Carmen Torres-Martín: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi, Carmen Ordas-Calvo: None declared, Cristina Luna-Gomez: None declared, Francisco J. Toyos Sáenz de Miera: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, Carmen González-Vela: None declared, Javier García-Fernández: None declared, Patricia Vicente-Gómez: None declared, Ángel García-Manzanares: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, Montserrat Corteguera: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

FRI0182 RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH RENAL INVOLVEMENT IN PRIMARY SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME: DATA FROM THE SPANISH SJÖGRENSER COHORT

Objectives:

To investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and effects of primary renal disease on morbidity and mortality in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS).

Methods:

All patients in the SJÖGRENSER (registry of adult SSp patients of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology, cross-sectional phase) cohort were retrospectively investigated for the presence of clinically significant renal involvement directly related to pSS activity.

Results:

Of the 437 patients investigated, 39 (9%) presented overt renal involvement during follow-up. Severe renal disease necessitating kidney biopsy was relatively rare (23%).

Renal involvement may complicate pSS at any time during the disease course and is associated with severe disease (indicated by higher scores of involvement, activity, and damage), systemic multiorgan involvement, and a higher frequency of lymphoma. Multivariate analysis showed that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.07), higher European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index scores (OR 1.1, CI 1.03–1.18), serum anti-La/SSB positivity (OR 6.44, CI 1.36–30.37), and non-vasculitic cutaneous involvement (OR 8.64, 1.33–55.90) were independently associated with this complication.

Chronic renal failure developed in 23 of 39 patients (59%); only 1 of them progressed to end-stage renal disease necessitating renal replacement therapy. Patients with renal disease showed higher Sjögren’s syndrome disease damage index scores (SSDDI), higher rates of hospitalization due to disease activity and higher rates of clinically relevant comorbidities.

Conclusion:

Renal involvement is an uncommon complication in pSS that was observed in 9% of patients. Although categorized as a non-negligible comorbidity, this condition shows a favorable prognosis.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

SAT0567 USE OF THERMOGRAPHY OF HANDS AND MACHINE LEARNING TO DIFFERENTIATE PATIENTS WITH ARTHRITIS FROM HEALTHY SUBJECTS

Background:

The early diagnosis of rheumatic diseases improves their prognosis. However, patients take several months to reach the rheumatologist from the beginning of the first symptoms. Thermography is a safe and fast technique that captures the heat of an object through infrared photography. The inflammation of the joints causes an increase in temperature and, therefore, can be measured by thermography. Machine learning methods have shown that they are capable of analyzing medical images with an accuracy similar or superior to that of a healthcare professional.

Objectives:

Develop an algorithm that, based on thermographic images of hands and machine learning, differentiates healthy subjects from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PA), undifferentiated arthritis (UA) and arthritis of hands secondary to other diseases (SA).

Methods:

Multicenter observational study conducted in the rheumatology and radiology service of two hospitals. Patients with RA, PA, UA and SA who attended the followup visit and healthy subjects (companions and healthcare proffesionals) were recruited. In all cases, a thermal image of the hands was taken using a Flir One Pro or Thermal Expert TE-Q1 camera connected to the mobile and an ultrasound of both hands. The degree of synovial hypertrophy (SH) and power doppler (PD) was assessed for each joint (score from 0 to 3). Inflammation was defined as the presence of SH> 1 or PD> 0. Machine learning was used to classify patients with RA, PA, UA and SA with inflammation evidenced by ultrasound and healthy subjects from thermographic images. The evaluation of the classifier was performed by leave-one-out cross-validation and the area under the ROC curve (AUCROC) in those subjects whose thermal image was performed with the Thermal Expert TE-Q1 camera. The study was approved by the Clinical Ethics and Research Committee of the centers.

Results:

500 subjects were recruited from March 2018 to January 2020, of these 73 were excluded due to poor quality in the thermal image (moved or absence of temperature contrast between hand and background). Of the 427 subjects analyzed, 129 corresponded to healthy subjects, 138 to patients without evidence of inflammation and 160 to patients with inflammation evidenced by ultrasound (116 RA and 44 PA, UA or SA). Of these, 42% were taken using the Thermal Expert TE-Q1 camera. An AUCROC of 0.73 (p-value <0.01) was obtained for the healthy classifier vs RA and 0.72 (p-value <0.01) for the healthy classifier vs PA, UA and SA.

Conclusion:

A classification model has been developed capable of differentiating patients with RA, PA, UA and SA with evidence of inflammation from healthy subjects. These results open an opportunity to develop tools that facilitate early diagnosis.

References:

[1]Barhamain AS, Magliah RF, Shaheen MH, Munassar SF, Falemban AM, Alshareef MM, Almoallim HM. The journey of rheumatoid arthritis patients: a review of reported lag times from the onset of symptoms. Open Access Rheumatol. 2017 Jul 28;9:139-150. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S138830. eCollection 2017. Review.

[2]Lynch CJ, Liston C. New machine-learning technologies for computer-aided diagnosis. Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1304-1305. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0178-4.

[3]Brenner M, Braun C, Oster M, Gulko PS. Thermal signature analysis as a novel method for evaluating inflammatory arthritis activity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Mar;65(3):306-11.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0620 EFFECTIVENESS OF RITUXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS. A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS

Background:

Rituximab (RTX) is effective in improving skin affection in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (DcSSc). However, there are few data on early use of this drug.

Objectives:

To evaluate RTX effectiveness for skin disease in patients with DcSSc of less than 3 years of evolution.

Methods:

Multicenter, observational and retrospective study. Patients with DcSSc starting RTX within 3 years since first non-Raynaud symptom were recruited. Demographic variables, time of disease duration at the beginning of RTX, immune pattern and time on RTX treatment were collected. Effectiveness was defined as modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) improvement. Evaluations were done by the same experienced rheumatologist. Patients subjective perception of skin hardening and/or tightness was evaluated. mRSS changes from baseline to 6 and 12 months after RTX beginning and, later on, to the last available observation were analysed using Wilcoxon test. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0.

Results:

11 patients (8 women) were recruited from 2 university hospitals. Median age was 48 years (IQR 22). Median time since diagnosis to RTX beginning was 12 months (IQR 8). 5, 3 and 2 patients presented ATA +, RNPIII + and Ro-52 +, respectively. Median duration of RTX treatment was 12 months (IQR 68). Median baseline mRSS was 15.5 (IQR 18). Median mRSS after 6 and 12 months of RTX treatment and at last available mRSS evaluation was 15 (IQR 13), 14.5 (IQR 13) and 11 (IQR 16), respectively. mRSS showed statistically significant improvement at 6 (29%, IQR 37) and 12 months of RTX treatment (35%, IQR 34) and, thereafter, at last available observation (39%, IQR 51), compared to basal mRSS. Most patients reported subjective improvement at 6 (9 of 10 patients) and 12 months (6 of 7), and at last available evaluation (6 of 8); all other patients reported stability.

Conclusion:

In our experience, patients with DcSSc seem to benefit of early RTX treatment. Improvement may be seen as early as 6 months and seems to reach a plateau at 12 months.

Disclosure of Interests:

I Vázquez-Gómez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, J Lluch Pons: None declared, Marta Aguilar-Zamora: None declared, L Montolio-Chiva: None declared, Ana V Orenes Vera: None declared, Eduardo Flores: None declared, Elia Valls-Pascual Grant/research support from: Roche, Novartis, and AbbVie, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB Pharma, Desamparados Ybañez: None declared, À Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, A Sendra-García: None declared, Inmaculada Torner Hernández: None declared, V Núñez-Monje: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis

AB0594 EFFECTIVENESS OF RITUXIMAB IN CSDMARDS-RESISTANT ACTIVE MIXED CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASE

Background:

Objectives:

To evaluate rituximab (RTX) effectiveness and safety in treating patients with refractory mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD).

Methods:

Open observational study including patients with refractory MCTD (active disease despite treatment with glucocorticoids and csDMARDs) from two third-level hospitals who had been treated with RTX (off-label use) from January 2001 to December 2019.

Results:

Thirteen patients (all women) were included, with a mean age of 32 years (SD: 10, range 17-50) and a median time of evolution of the disease of 55 months (SD: 34.3; range 5-98 months). The main indication for initiating treatment with RTX was refractory arthritis (100%), most of the times accompanied by other features of the disease including shrinking lung syndrome (2), fibrosing progressive non-specific interstitial pneumonia (FP-NSIP) (1), recurrent serositis (2), glomerulonephritis (GMN) (2), lymphadenitis (1) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (1). All patients were treated with RTX at rheumatoid arthritis dosage while the baseline immunosuppressive treatment (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, leflunomide or tacrolimus) remained unchanged. Hydroxychloroquine was also associated in 8 of the patients. The follow-up time (median) after starting RTX was 118 months (range, 65-177 months, with a total of 132.6 patient-years of follow-up) and the mean number of cycles of treatment was 4.2 (range, 1-15), with a variable interval (from 6 to 12 months). After the first RTX cycle, a partial or complete response was achieved in 92% of the patients. A significant improvement in the mean DAS28-ESR was observed (initial: 4.56 ± 1.6 / final: 2.21 ± 0.85; p=0.008). In all but one patient, who had previously failed to 2 anti-TNFα DAS28-ESR clinical remission or low activity was achieved, generally from week 16 to 20, although relapses were frequent and all cases need retreatment after 6-9 months. In 4 patients, RTX retreatment dosage was optimized to 1 g/cycle. The 3 patients with pulmonary involvement showed stabilization (2 cases) or improvement (1) of the lung function(as defined by the American Thoracic Society). In patients with GMN, renal response to RTX treatment was complete in a patient and partial in the other. The patient with ITP entered remission after the first RTX cycle and no more cycles were needed. Response in patients with serositis and lymphadenitis was also complete and maintained. Moreover, the glucocorticoid doses were reduced to less than half of the initial dose in all cases. At the end of the follow-up, 7 out of the 13 patients (54%) were still being treated with RTX. For the remaining 6 patients, RTX was withdrawn because of primary failure (1), recurrent bacterial infections (2), gestational desire (2) sustained remission (1).

Conclusion:

According to our preliminary results, RTX seems to be effective and relatively safe in patients with csDMARDs-resistant active MCTD.

Disclosure of Interests:

L Montolio-Chiva: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, J Lluch Pons: None declared, Ana V Orenes Vera: None declared, I Vázquez-Gómez: None declared, Maribel Mora: None declared, Xavier González: None declared, Carla Marco: None declared, Jesús Rodriguez: None declared, Montserrat Romera: None declared, Joan Miquel Nolla: None declared

SAT0270 TOCILIZUMAB IN REFRACTORY TAKAYASU ARTERITIS. OPEN-LABEL NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 53 PATIENTS OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) was recently approved for Takayasu Arteritis (TAK) in Japan based on the results of the TAKT trial(1).However, data in clinical practice in Europe and America are scarce(2).

Objectives:

To assess efficacy and safety of TCZ in TAK of clinical practice in Spain.

Methods:

Observational, open-label multicentre study of 53 TAK patients treated with TCZ due to refractoriness or adverse events of previous therapy. Outcomes variables were improvement of clinical features, acute phase reactants and glucocorticoid-sparing effect.

Results:

53 patients (46w/7m); mean age, 40.6±14.6 years at TCZ onset. TCZ was started after a median of 12 [3.0-48.0] months from TAK diagnosis. In addition to systemic corticosteroids and before TCZ they received conventional immunosuppressant drugs (n=42) and biologic therapy (n=14). TCZ was prescribed as standard I.V. (n=42; 79.2%) or subcutaneous (n=11; 20.8%). The initial dose was 8 mg/kg/IV/4 weeks or 162 mg/SC/week, respectively. TCZ was used in monotherapy or combined with immunosuppressants (n=32; 60.4%): methotrexate (n=27), azathioprine (n=2), cyclosporine (n=3). Main clinical features at TCZ onset were: malaise (n=30),limb claudication (n=22), headache (n=18), fever (n=14), abdominal pain (n=10), and chest pain (n=9). Most of the patients experienced a rapid and maintained clinical, analytical improvement(TABLE).After a median follow-up of 18.0 [7.0-45.0] months, TCZ was discontinued in 20 patients due to: sustained remission (n=6), relapse (n=6), adverse event (n=5), gestation (n=3). Most relevant adverse side effects were serious infections: pneumonia (n=2), herpes zoster (n=1), abdominal sepsis (n=1).

Table.Basal(N=53)Month 1(N=53)Month 3(N=46)Month 6(N=44)Month 12(N=34)Clinical improvement, n/N(%)Complete17/53 (32.1)19/46 (41.3)23/44 (52.3)26/34 (76.5)Partial30/53 (54.6)26/46 (56.5)18/44 (40.9)8/34 (23.5)No improvement6/53 (11.3)1/46 (2.2)3/44 (6.8)0/34 (0.0)Analytical markers,ESR (mm/1sth),median [IQR]35.0 [16.0-52.0]7.5 [3.0-14.0] *3.5 [2.0-8.0]*5.0[2.0-6.0]*5.0 [2.0-8.5]*CRP (mg/dL),median [IQR]1.7 [0.6 -3.5]0.21 [0.05-0.6]*0.14 [0.05-0.5]*0.14 [0.04-0.4]*0.10 [0.03-0.30]*Hb (g/dL),mean±SD12.3±1.512.8±1.2*12.9±1.3*12.9±1.4*12.9±1.4*Prednisone dose (mg/day),median [IQR]30.0 [15.0-50.0]20.0 [10.0-37.5]*10.0 [5.0-20.0]*5.0 [5.0-12.5]*5.0 [0.0-7.5]*

*Wilcoxon test p < 0.001.

Conclusion:

TCZ appears to be effective and safe in patients with refractory TAK in clinical practice.

References:

[1]Nakaoka Y et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:348-354

[2]Loricera J et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34: S44-53.

Disclosure of Interests:

D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Pilar Bernabéu: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Mercedes Freire González: None declared, Beatriz González-Alvarez: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Esteban Rubio Romero: None declared, SALVADOR GARCÍA MORILLO: None declared, Mauricio Minguez: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido Consultant of: Yes, I have received fees for scientific advice (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis), Speakers bureau: Yes, I have received fees as a speaker (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis), Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Sheila Melchor: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Beatriz Bravo: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J Salvatierra: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, C. Romero-Gómez: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Javier Mendizabal: None declared, Francisco Miguel Ortiz Sanjuan: None declared, I. Pérez de Pedro: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma. MSD

THU0307 RESPONSE OF BEHÇET’S REFRACTORY ORAL AND/OR GENITAL ULCERS TO APREMILAST IN COMBINATION VS MONOTHERAPY. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 51 CASES OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Apremilast (APR) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of oral and/or genital aphthous ulcers in Behçet´s disease (BD). Combination of APR to other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has not been assessed.

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy and safety of APR in monotherapy or combined with DMARDs in refractory BD.

Methods:

National multicenter open-label study on 51 BD patients with oral and/or genital ulcers refractory to conventional treatment.

Results:

We included 51 patients (35 women/16 men), mean age 44.7±13.2 years. Before APR, all patients had received several systemic conventional drugs. The main clinical symptoms for starting APR were oral (n=19) and genital (2) aphthous ulcers or both (30).

Excluding corticosteroids, colchicine or NSAIDs, APR was given at standard dose of 30 mg twice daily in monotherapy (n=31), or combined with conventional DMARDs in 16 cases (6 azathioprine, 5 methotrexate, 4 hydroxychloroquine, 4 sulfasalazine, 1 dapsone) or with biologic DMARDs in 4 (2 tocilizumab, 1 adalimumab, 1 infliximab). There were not found statistically significant differences in demographic features, previous therapy, clinical manifestations or reported adverse effects.

After a median follow-up of 6 [3-12] months, most of the patients experienced improvement of the orogenital ulcers in both groups (89.8% in the first 2 weeks), without statistically significant differences.(TABLE)

Conclusion:

APR leads to a rapid and maintained improvement in most patients with refractory BD orogenital ulcers. APR seems as effective and safe in monotherapy as combined.

TABLE:Week 1-2Week 4Month 6Month 12Month 24Outcome of oral and/or genital ulcers n, (%)Cn=19Mn=30Cn=19Mn=26Cn=12Mn=17Cn=7Mn=6Cn=1Mn=1 Complete resolution8 (42.1)11 (36.7)12 (63.2)20 (77)7 (58.4)14 (82.4)3 (42.8)3 (50)1 (100)1 (100) Partial resolution9 (47.4)16 (53.4)7 (36.8)3 (11.5)5 (41.6)2 (11.7)4 (57.2)3 (50)00 No response2 (10.5)3 (9.9)03 (11.5)01 (5.9)0000p value0.90.10.10.80.7

Abbreviations: C= combined; M= monotherapy; n= available data.

Disclosure of Interests:

Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Belen Atienza Mateo: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Manuel Martín Martínez: None declared, Elvira Diez: None declared, María Dolores García-Armario: None declared, Esperanza Martínez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya Alvarado: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Jaime Calvo Grant/research support from: Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Jansen, Celgene, Isabel de la Morena: None declared, Francisco Ortiz Sanjuán: None declared, José Andrés Román Ivorra: None declared, Ana Pérez Gómez: None declared, Sergi Heredia: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Águeda Prior: None declared, Carolina Díez: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, D Ybáñez-García Speakers bureau: Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Ángels Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Ignasi Figueras: None declared, Ana Isabel Turrión: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Pilar Trénor: None declared, Soledad Ojeda Speakers bureau: AMGEN, LILLY, GEBRO, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD

OP0033 OPTIMIZATION OF TOCILIZUMAB THERAPY IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. A MULTICENTER REAL-LIFE STUDY OF 134 PATIENTS

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only biological agent approved in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). There is general agreement on the initial and the standard maintenance dose of TCZ. However, information on duration and optimization of TCZ in GCA is scarce.

Objectives:

Our aim was to assess efficacy and safety of TCZ therapy optimization in an unselected wide series of GCA in clinical practice.

Methods:

Multicenter study, 134 patients with GCA who received TCZ due to inefficacy/adverse events of previous therapy. Once complete remission was reached and based on a shared decision between patient and physician TCZ was optimized in some cases. Optimization was done by decreasing the dose and/or prolonging the TCZ dosing interval progressively.

Results:

134 GCA patients treated with TCZ (101w/33m); mean age 73.0±8.8 years. TCZ was administered IV to 106 (79.1%) patients and SC to 28 (20.9%). TCZ was optimized in 43 (32.1%) patients. No demographic, clinical manifestations or laboratory data differences had been found at TCZ onset (TABLE). After a follow up of 12 [6-15.5] months, and a complete remission for 6 [3-12] months; the first TCZ optimization was performed. Median prednisone dose at first TCZ optimization was 2.5 [0-5] mg/day. TCZ IV was optimized from 8 to 4 mg/kg/4weeks in 12 of 106 (11.3%) and from 162 mg/SC/week to 162 mg/SC/2weeks in 9 of 28 (32.1%) cases. Five (11.6%) of the 43 optimized cases relapsed. In 4 cases, the relapses were treated increasing TCZ up to the pre-optimization dose, in 1 case the route of administration was change (4 mg/kg/4week to 162 mg/SC/week). In 8 of 43 optimized patients (18.6%), it was possible to withdraw TCZ after complete remission for 30 [16.25-45.75] months. Regarding adverse events and severe infections were similar in both groups. The mean TCZ treatment costs were lower in the optimized group.

Conclusion:

Once remission is reached in GCA patients under TCZ treatment, optimization of TCZ may be performed. Based on our experience it could be performed by reducing the dose with IV TCZ or by prolonging dosing interval with SC TCZ.

References:

[1]Calderón-Goercke M et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019 Aug;49(1): 126-135.

TABLE.OPTIMIZED-TCZ GROUP (n=43)NON-OPTIMIZED TCZ GROUP (n=91)pBASAL FEATURES AT TCZ ONSETGENERAL FEATURESAge, years, mean± SD68.9±8.771.4±8.50.125Sex, female/male n(%)32/1068/240.779Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]19.5[7.75-45]10.5[4 – 25]0.047SYSTEMIC MANIFESTATIONSFever, n(%)1(2.4)8(8.7)0.176Constitutional syndrome, n(%)11(26.2)19(20.7)0.476PMR, n(%)18(42.9)56(60.9)0.052ISCHEMIC MANIFESTATIONSVisual involvement, n(%)5(11.9)23(25)0.084Headache, n(%)26(61.9)42(45.7)0.081Jaw claudication, n(%)1(2.4)11(12)0.072CORTICOSTEROIDS AT TCZ ONSETPrednisone dose, mg/d mean (SD)15.1±11.125±17.40.001FOLLOW-UP ON TCZ THERAPY (MONTHS), MEDIAN [IQR]24[18-27]6 [3-18]0.000Relapses, n(%)5(11.6)5(5.5)0.207End follow-up remission, n(%)40(93)84(92)0.99Severe side efects, n(%)14(32.6)22(24.2)0.307Seriuos infections, n(%)6(14)10(11)0.878Cost, (mean) euros per yearIVSC7 538.47 329.011 726.411 726.4--

Disclosure of Interests:

Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elena Becerra-Fernández: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, E. Galindez: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, MSD, UCB, Pfizer, Menarini, Grunenthal, Gebro, Novartis, Janssen, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Catalina Gomez-Arango: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, María Álvarez del Buergo: None declared, Luisa Marena Rojas: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Francisco Navarro: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Arantxa Conesa: None declared, Carlos Vázquez: None declared, Jose Andrés Román-Ivorra: None declared, Pau Lluch: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Carmen Torres-Martín: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi, Carmen Ordas-Calvo: None declared, Cristina Luna-Gomez: None declared, Francisco J. Toyos Sáenz de Miera: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

SAT0035 RESPONSE TO ABATACEPT OF DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 263 PATIENTS

Background:

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a severe extraarticular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this line, several radiological patterns of RA-ILD have been described: i) usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), ii) nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), iii) obliterating bronchiolitis, iv) organized pneumonia and mixed patterns. Abatacept (ABA) could be an effective and safe option for patients with RA-ILD, although the response in the different radiological patterns is not well defined.

Objectives:

Our aim was to assess the response to ABA in different radiological patterns of ILD.

Methods:

Observational retrospective multicenter study of RA-ILD treated with ABA. ILD was diagnosed by HRCT and classified by radiological patterns in 3 different subgroups of RA-ILD: a) UIP, b) NSIP and c) “other”. ABA was used sc. or iv. at standard dose. We assessed: a) Dyspnoea (MMRC scale; significant variation ≥1); b) Respiratory function tests (significant changes ≥10% in FVC and DLCO); c) HRCT imaging; d) DAS28 e)prednisone dose.

Variables were collected at months 0, 3, 6, 12 months and subsequently every 12 months until a maximum of 60 months.

Results:

We included 263 patients: 106 UIP, 84 NSIP and 73 others (150 women / 113 men), mean age 64.64±10 years. Total patients positive for RF or CCPA were 235 (89.4%) and 233 (88.6%), respectively. In 26 out of 263 patients, the development of ILD was closely related to the administration of sDMARDs (MTX n = 11 and LFN n = 1) or bDMARDs (ETN n = 5, ADA n = 4, CZP n = 2 and IFX n = 3). Patient characteristics are shown in table 1. Figure 1 shows the evolution of the cases with available data after a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months. Mean DLCO and FVC remained stable in the 3 groups without statistically significant changes, and all the groups showed a statistically significant reduction in DAS28 and prednisone dose.

Conclusion:

ABA could be a good choice of treatment in patients with RA-ILD independently of the radiological pattern of ILD.

Disclosure of Interests:

Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.

, CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

OP0212 ABATACEPT IN INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 263 PATIENTS

Background:

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a severe complication of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Several conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and biologic (b) DMARDs may induce or impaired ILD-RA. Abatacept (ABA) may be useful in ILD-RA (1).

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety of ABA in a large series of ILD-RA for a long-term follow-up.

Methods:

Multicenter open-level study of ILD-RA treated with at least 1 dose of ABA. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution computed tomography (HRTC). We study these outcomes: a) 1-point change Modied Medical Research Council (MMRC); b) forced vital capacity (FVC) and/or DLCO improvement or decline ≥10%; c) change in HRCT, d) change in DAS28. e) Prednisone dose. Values were collected at 0, 3, 6, 12 and then every 12 months.

Results:

We studied 263 patients (150 women/113 men) (mean age;64.6±10 years), with ILD-RA. At ABA-onset they were smokers or exsmoker (53.8%), positive APCC (88.6%), median [IQR] duration of ILD of 12 [3-41.25] months, mean DLCO (65.7±18.3) and FVC (85.9±21.8).

The ILD-pattern were usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (40.3%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (31.9%) and others (27.8%).

ABA was prescribed at standard subcutaneous (125 mg/w) in 196 (74.5%) or intravenously (10 mg/kg/4 w) in 67 (25.5%); in monotherapy (n=111) or combined with cDMARDs (n=152); especially leflunomide (n=55), MTX (n=46), or antimarials (n=21).

After a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months most outcomes remain stable (Figure). Moreover, DAS28 improved from 4.5±1.5 to 3.1±1.3; prednisone dose reduced from a median 7.5 [5-10] to 5 mg [5-7.5] and retention rate was 76.4%. The main adverse effects were serious infections (n=28), neoplasia (n=3), serious infusion reaction (n=1) and myocardial infarction (n=1).

Conclusion:

ABA seems effective and relatively safe in ILD-RA.

References:

[1]Fernández-Díaz C et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 48:22-27

Disclosure of Interests:

Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.

CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

Differences in clinical manifestations and increased severity of systemic lupus erythematosus between two groups of Hispanics: European Caucasians versus Latin American mestizos (data from the RELESSER registry)

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is regarded as a prototype autoimmune disease because it can serve as a means for studying differences between ethnic minorities and sex. Traditionally, all Hispanics have been bracketed within the same ethnic group, but there are differences between Hispanics from Spain and those from Latin America, not to mention other Spanish-speaking populations.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics, severity, activity, damage, mortality and co-morbidity of SLE in Hispanics belonging to the two ethnic groups resident in Spain, and to identify any differences.

Methods

This was an observational, multi-centre, retrospective study. The demographic and clinical variables of patients with SLE from 45 rheumatology units were collected. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Hispanic patients from the registry were divided into two groups: Spaniards or European Caucasians (EC) and Latin American mestizos (LAM). Comparative univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were carried out.

Results

A total of 3490 SLE patients were included, 90% of whom were female; 3305 (92%) EC and 185 (5%) LAM. LAM patients experienced their first lupus symptoms four years earlier than EC patients and were diagnosed and included in the registry younger, and their SLE was of a shorter duration. The time in months from the first SLE symptoms to diagnosis was longer in EC patients, as were the follow-up periods. LAM patients exhibited higher prevalence rates of myositis, haemolytic anaemia and nephritis, but there were no differences in histological type or serositis. Anti-Sm, anti-Ro and anti-RNP antibodies were more frequently found in LAM patients. LAM patients also had higher levels of disease activity, severity and hospital admissions. However, there were no differences in damage index, mortality or co-morbidity index. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, in several models the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for a Katz severity index >3 in LAM patients was 1.45 (1.038–2.026; p = 0.02). This difference did not extend to activity levels (i.e. SLEDAI >3; 0.98 (0.30–1.66)).

Conclusion

SLE in Hispanic EC patients showed clinical differences compared to Hispanic LAM patients. The latter more frequently suffered nephritis and higher severity indices. This study shows that where lupus is concerned, not all Hispanics are equal.

Replication of PTPRC as genetic biomarker of response to TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Genetic biomarkers could be useful for orienting treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but none has been convincingly validated yet. Putative biomarkers include 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms that have shown association with response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in candidate gene studies and that we assayed here in 755 RA patients. Three of them, in the PTPRC, IL10 and CHUK genes, were significantly associated with response to TNFi. The most significant result was obtained with rs10919563 in PTPRC, which is a confirmed RA susceptibility locus. Its RA risk allele was associated with improved response (B=0.33, P=0.006). This is the second independent replication of this biomarker (P=9.08 × 10(-8) in the combined 3003 RA patients). In this way, PTPRC has become the most replicated genetic biomarker of response to TNFi. In addition, the positive but weaker replication of IL10 and CHUK should stimulate further validation studies.

Analysis of disease activity and response to treatment in a large Spanish cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

The objectives of this paper are to study the impact of disease activity in a large cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and estimate the rate of response to therapies.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional cohort study of 3658 SLE patients. Data on demographics, disease characteristics: activity (SELENA-SLEDAI), damage, severity, hospitalizations and therapies were collected. Factors associated with refractory disease were identified by logistic regression.

Results

A total of 3658 patients (90% female; median SLE duration (interquartile range): 10.4 years (5.3–17.1)) were included. At the time of their last evaluation, 14.7% of the patients had moderate-severe SLE (SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥6). There were 1954 (53.4%) patients who were hospitalized for activity at least once over the course of the disease. At some stage, 84.6% and 78.8% of the patients received glucocorticoids and antimalarials, respectively, and 51.3% of the patients received at least one immunosuppressant. Owing to either toxicity or ineffectiveness, cyclophosphamide was withdrawn in 21.5% of the cases, mycophenolate mofetil in 24.9%, azathioprine in 40.2% and methotrexate in 46.8%. At some stage, 7.3% of the patients received at least one biologic. A total of 898 (24.5%) patients had refractory SLE at some stage. Renal, neuropsychiatric, vasculitic, hematological and musculoskeletal involvement, a younger age at diagnosis and male gender were associated with refractory disease.

Conclusions

A significant percentage of patients have moderately-to-severely active SLE at some stage. Disease activity has a big impact in terms of need for treatment and cause of hospitalization. The effectiveness of the standard therapies for reducing disease activity is clearly insufficient. Some clinical features are associated with refractory SLE.