[Evaluation of respiratory muscle strength in patients with interstitial lung changes based on simultaneous measurement of esophageal and mouth pressure]

A well know good relation between nasal and oesophageal inspiratory pressures exists in healthy and in COPD patients "sniff manoeuvres. Similar results are obtained using "gasp" maneuvers. The aim of the study was to appreciate the usefulness of "gasp" for evaluation of inspiratory muscles strength in ILD patients. 18 ILD patients were examined: group A consisted of 9 pts (8M+IF) aged 35 +/- 8.6 yrs, with static compliance > 70% pred. (mean 98.6 +/- 16.3), group B consisted of 9 pts (6M + 3F) (aged 52 +/- 13.0) with static compliance < 70% pred. (mean 37.2 +/- 12.0), Pmo and Poe (Milic-Emili method) were measured simultaneously during breathing with Pflex device (1.7 mm diameter). Results were stored in a computer for further analysis. In all patients spirometry, plethysmography and maximal inspiratory (MIP) and maximal expiratory (MEP) pressure measurements were performed. Poe and Pmo in group A were nearly the same (8.16 +/- 1.82 vs. 8.35 +/- 2.74 kPa), but in the group B Pmo was lower than Poe (4.81 +/- 1.59 vs. 6.19 +/- 2.03 kPa; p < 0.0005). We conclude that "gasp" - Pmo is a useful method for inspiratory muscle strength measurement only in ILD patients with normal static compliance but in ILD patients with decreased compliance "gasp" - Poe measurement in necessary.

Phase I/pharmacokinetic study of topotecan by 24-hour continuous infusion weekly

Topotecan (SK&F 104864, hycamptamine, NSC 609699) is believed to exert its cytotoxic effects through inhibition of topoisomerase I, the activity of which recovers rapidly on removal of the drug in vitro. In vivo studies show that the activity of topotecan is schedule dependent, favoring repeated doses. Early human studies showed that topotecan (the active lactone) had a short half-life in plasma. To prolong drug exposure, we administered topotecan as a 24-h i.v. infusion and repeated it weekly. We treated 32 patients with doses of 1.0-2.0 mg/m2. Median performance status was 1, and all but four patients had received prior chemotherapy. Dose-limiting neutropenia occurred at doses > or = 1.75 mg/m2; nadirs were observed after 1-3 doses. The recommended phase II dose is 1.5 mg/m2/week. One patient with metastatic colon cancer had a partial response. Both plasma topotecan (lactone) and total topotecan (measured by converting the hydroxyacid form to the lactone by acidification of the sample) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in 21 patients. During infusion, mean topotecan plasma steady-state concentrations ranged from 4.7-11.4 nM. Plasma elimination was best fit to a one-compartment model with a mean t1/2 of 3.5 h. The mean total body clearance was 388 ml/min/m2. Concentrations of the inactive form approximated those of the lactone throughout. No evidence for dose-dependent pharmacokinetics was observed in this dose range. Pharmacodynamic analysis, using the sigmoid Emax model, revealed that the pharmacokinetic parameters of both lactone and total drug were positively correlated with bone marrow toxicity. Total drug steady-state plasma concentration provided a good estimate of neutropenia, suggesting a simple, easily monitored, pharmacokinetic parameter for adaptive dosing using this schedule. Phase II evaluation of this weekly schedule is indicated in solid tumors.

Phase I/pharmacokinetic/biochemical study of the nitroimadazole hypoxic cell sensitiser SR2508 (etanidazole) in combination with cyclophosphamide

SR2508 sensitises certain hypoxic tumor cells in vitro and in vivo to the cytotoxic action of radiation and alkylating agents. The mechanism of sensitisation may derive in part from depletion of glutathione (GSH) and possibly inhibition of GSH-dependent enzymes in target cells. We treated 46 evaluable patients with cyclophosphamide 750-1000 mg m-2 followed by SR2508 at eight dose levels ranging from 2.5 to 15.0 g m-2. Each patient received SR2508 as a single agent initially, followed a week later by the combination of cyclophosphamide and SR2508. Initially, myelosuppression was the major toxicity; potentiation of cyclophosphamide-induced leukopenia by SR2508 required a dose reduction of cyclophosphamide to 750 mg m-2 at SR2508 doses above 7.2 g m-2. At doses above 9.4 g m-2 an acute syndrome of muscle pains and painful paresthesias of the extremities lasting 12-24 h was observed to occur with increasing severity. This side-effect was intolerable in two of three patients treated at 15.0 g m-2. The only other reproducible side-effect was nausea and vomiting which was controllable with antiemetics. Plasma and urine SR2508 concentrations were measured by HPLC in 45 patients. Plasma elimination curves fit a 2-compartment model. The mean terminal half-life at each dose level ranged from 5.1-5.8 h. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve was linearly related to dose, and mean total body clearance ranged from 46.6-94.0 ml-1 min-1 m-2; renal clearance accounted for 65.7-79.3%. Pretreatment with cyclophosphamide did not influence the kinetics of SR2508 in individual patients. Examination of the glutathione content of peripheral mononuclear cells and tumour samples showed that depletion to below 50% of control occurred in the majority of patients. GSH transferase inhibition occurred with a similar time-course, but to a lesser extent. These data suggest that the further evaluation of this regimen should be conducted with SR2508 administration preceding that of cyclophosphamide and that its evaluation in cyclophosphamide-sensitive tumours is warranted.

Research considerations. Geropsychiatry unit evaluation

The specialized psychiatric units for geriatric patients are believed to be effective, yet no studies could be found documenting this. A method of evaluating the effectiveness of a geropsychiatric program is to measure changes in the cognitive and functional status of its patients. This study supports the hypothesis that there would be an improvement in the geropsychiatric patients' cognitive and functional assessment scores by discharge and after hospitalization.

Preservation of immune effector cell function following administration of a dose-intense 5-fluorouracil-chemotherapy regimen

In a phase II clinical trial of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) plus N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA) therapy administration, a number of slowly developing clinical responses were observed. Because of this, a variety of immune parameters were sequentially studied in 21 patients on this trial. Of the 21 patients studied, 20 provided sufficient samples to compare baseline with subsequent values, 10 of the 20 patients responded to treatment. Responders and non-responders did not differ in any studied parameter at baseline. After 2 months of therapy, non-specific monocyte cytotoxicity (NSMC), antibody-dependent monocyte cytotoxicity (ADMC) and natural killer (NK) activity were higher in the entire study population, but these increases were not statistically significant. When responders and non-responders were evaluated separately, it was apparent that the trend was due solely to the changes observed in the responding patient population. When mean lysis values for each patient group were determined for each studied time point, it was possible to generate a mean area under the cytotoxicity/time curve (AUC) for each studied parameter. NSMC and ADMC did not differ in responders and non-responders. However, NK activity was significantly greater by mean AUC analysis (P = 0.006) in the responding group; NK activity was maintained in the responders, but decreased in non-responders. When lymphocyte and monocyte expression of the surface markers beta 2-microglobulin, HLA-DR, CD56, HNK-1, CD16 and interleukin-2 receptor were evaluated, there were no differences among responders and non-responders at baseline by mean AUC analysis or when comparing baseline with non-baseline values. It is concluded that although baseline immunological characteristics do not identify patients who are likely to respond to weekly 5FU and PALA, treatment is not associated with deleterious effects on the immune effector function parameters evaluated in this study, there being no effects on expression of a variety of associated cell-surface molecules.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel platinum analogue CI-973 on a 5-daily dose schedule

CI-973, a platinum(II) derivative with a 2-methyl-1,4-butanediamine carrier ligand, has activity in cisplatin-resistant tumor models in vitro and in vivo. In a Phase I pharmacokinetic study, 31 patients were treated with CI-973 (24 to 50 mg/m2/day for 5 days; 28-day cycles) given i.v. over 30 min without routine antiemetic prophylaxis or hydration. Of the 29 patients evaluable for maximum tolerated dose determination, most had a performance status of 0 or 1, and most had received prior chemotherapy. Neutropenia was dose limiting at 40 and 50 mg/m2/day. Recovery from neutropenia was generally rapid with nadir counts and recovery usually occurring by Days 15 and 22, respectively. Drug-associated thrombocytopenia was uncommon and never severe, even in patients with Grade 4 neutropenia. Anemia was common, but did not appear dose related. Drug-related nausea and vomiting and changes in renal function were relatively infrequent and mild. No clinically evident ototoxicity was reported, although changes in audiograms were noted in several patients. CI-973 concentrations were measured in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The harmonic mean terminal half-life was 2.0 h. The mean CI-973 renal and nonrenal clearance values were 42.3 and 37.4 ml/min/m2, respectively. The mean recovery of CI-973 in urine was 53% of the administered dose. The mean ratio of CI-973 renal clearance to creatinine clearance was 0.92. Total clearance correlated with creatinine clearance (r2 = 0.63). A relationship between toxicity, expressed as the percentage of reduction in absolute granulocyte count, and area under the CI-973 plasma concentration-time curve was found in a subgroup of "good-risk" patients. This relationship, described well by a sigmoidal Emax pharmacodynamic model, did not hold for patients with extensive prior therapy or poor performance status. A model for toxicity prediction based on dose and creatinine clearance has been derived and will be validated in future studies. The recommended Phase II dose of CI-973 is 30 mg/m2/day for 5 days.

Phase II trial of PALA in combination with 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer

Phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), in inhibitor of aspartate transcarbamylase that depletes uridine nucleotide pools, selectively potentiates the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in preclinical models. Due to the promising results we obtained using PALA/5-FU in colorectal cancer, we performed a phase II trial in patients presenting with advanced pancreatic cancer. PALA was given intravenously at 250 mg/m2 on day 1, followed 24 h later by 2,600 mg/m2 5-FU given by 24-h infusion. Treatments were repeated weekly. A total of 41 patients who had not previously undergone chemotherapy were entered in the trial; of these, 35 were evaluable for response. Toxicity was generally mild to moderate; neurotoxicity (13/35) and diarrhea (8/35) predominated. Among the 35 patients, 1 achieved a complete response and 4, a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 14%. The median survival was 5.1 months. Pretreatment with PALA alone was not sufficient to enhance the activity of 5-FU in pancreatic cancer.

Phase II study of weekly 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and vinblastine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The scheduling of chemotherapeutic agents may be important in optimising their antitumour actions. This has been explored in non-Hodgkin lymphoma, osteogenic sarcoma and bladder cancer with improved results using intensive, weekly dosing schemas. We began a phase II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and vinblastine in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on a weekly schedule. 38 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were entered; 32 are evaluable for response. 11 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil 1.5 g/m2 and vinblastine 4 mg/m2 by 24-h continuous infusion, and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 over 30 min, 6-8 h after the start of the infusion. Because of prohibitive myelotoxicity, the next 27 patients received 5-fluorouracil 1.2 g/m2 and vinblastine 3 mg/m2. None had had prior chemotherapy while 6 had had previous radiation therapy. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxic effect. Other side-effects included neuropathy, diarrhoea, mucositis, nausea and vomiting. 32 patients are evaluable for response: there have been 14 partial remissions (44%). Responses have occurred chiefly in lung and lymph nodes. The median survival on this study is 7 months, and responders did not live longer than non-responders. While this regimen is well tolerated by the majority of patients and has a response rate comparable to other active regimens identified in single institution studies, survival does not appear to be enhanced. We conclude that the schedule manipulation described here does not enhance the therapeutic index of these drugs in NSCLC.

Phase I trial of fluorouracil modulation by N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate and 6-methylmercaptopurine riboside: optimization of 6-methylmercaptopurine riboside dose and schedule through biochemical analysis of sequential tumor biopsy specimens

Preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that the selective antitumor activity of fluorouracil (5-FU) is enhanced by agents which perturb certain intracellular nucleotide pools. We previously demonstrated that the combination of N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), which depletes pyrimidine nucleotide pools, and 5-FU yielded a 43% response rate among 37 assessable patients with colorectal carcinoma. In preclinical tumor models, 6-methylmercaptopurine riboside (MMPR), an inhibitor of purine synthesis, elevates phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) pools and promotes the anabolism of 5-FU to fluorinated nucleotides. In vivo, the addition of MMPR enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PALA-5-FU. In a phase I trial, we sought to determine the optimal dose and schedule of MMPR in combination with PALA (250 mg/m2 on day 1) and 5-FU (1300 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 2). MMPR (75-225 mg/m2) was given intravenously on day 1 to 27 patients with solid tumors (15 colorectal, seven breast, five other). Toxic effects were mild to moderate and included leukopenia, mucositis, nausea, or rash. Two of seven patients given MMPR at 225 mg/m2 had grade 3 diarrhea. PRPP was measured using a [14C]orotic acid 14CO2 release assay in tumor biopsy specimens obtained before and 12 hours and 24 hours after MMPR doses were given to 20 patients. The addition of MMPR elevated PRPP pools in human solid tumors. At 12 hours after treatment, two (50%) of four patients showed a twofold or greater elevation of PRPP at the MMPR dose level of 75 mg/m2; a similar elevation was observed in five (71%) of seven patients given 150 mg/m2 MMPR and in three (43%) of seven patients given 225 mg/m2 MMPR. At 24 hours after treatment, results for the respective dose levels of MMPR were two (33%) of six patients, one (20%) of five patients, and four (57%) of seven patients. Administration of the two highest MMPR dose levels appeared to result in a greater increase in tumor PRPP levels. However, toxicity was greater at the 225 mg/m2 dose level; therefore, the 150 mg/m2 dose level was favored. Tumor levels of PRPP decreased between 12 hours and 24 hours in nine (56%) of 16 patients. This time course indicates that MMPR should be administered at the beginning of the 24-hour infusion of 5-FU.

Pharmacokinetic study of trimetrexate in combination with cisplatin

The addition of the antifol methotrexate to cisplatin (DDP) produces supraadditive antitumor effects in preclinical studies, but in the clinic this combination of two nephrotoxic drugs is limited by excessive toxicity. Trimetrexate (TMTX) is a second generation antifol with predominantly nonrenal elimination and antitumor activity superior to that of methotrexate in preclinical models. In early clinical trials TMTX demonstrated promising activity in non-small cell lung cancer, and nephrotoxicity was rare. We performed a Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of TMTX (escalating doses) in combination with DDP (20 mg/m2), both administered i.v. for 5 consecutive days, every 4 wk. The pharmacokinetics of TMTX was determined in 15 patients after administration of the single agent (baseline study) and following the Day 1 and Day 5 doses in the TMTX-DDP combination. The recommended Phase II single-agent dose of TMTX on this schedule, 8 mg/m2, did not produce excessive toxicity when given concurrently with DDP. Significant drug-related nephrotoxicity was not observed, even in patients receiving multiple courses of TMTX-DDP. The mean renal clearance of TMTX increased 1.4-fold and 2.8-fold over baseline on Days 1 and 5, respectively, of TMTX-DDP. Urinary flow was similarly greater on days of TMTX-DDP treatment. The nonrenal clearance of TMTX was unaffected by concurrent DDP. The steady-state volume of distribution, Vdss, and terminal elimination half-life were significantly greater on Day 5 of TMTX-DDP compared to baseline. The plasma protein-binding of TMTX in vitro was not altered by DDP, and the disappearance of ultrafilterable DDP from normal plasma in vitro was unchanged by TMTX. Although a protein-binding interaction of TMTX and DDP was not detected in normal plasma in vitro, the changes in renal clearance, Vdss, and the terminal half-life were consistent with a greater fraction of unbound TMTX in plasma following Day 5 of TMTX-DDP. Effects of DDP on the binding of TMTX to extravascular tissue components, or on the renal handling of TMTX, cannot be excluded. The increase in TMTX renal clearance correlated with increased urinary flow, which may improve the therapeutic index of TMTX as both an antineoplastic and antiparasitic agent.

Phase II study of amonafide (nafidamide, NSC 308847) in advanced colorectal cancer

Amonafide, a benzisoquinoline-1,3-dione with anti-tumor activity in preclinical screens, was administered to patients with recurrent or metastatic bidimensionally measurable colorectal cancer. Fourteen patients with no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, performance status 0-1, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function were entered. Amonafide 300 mg/m2 was administered intravenously over 1 hour daily for five consecutive days; courses were repeated every three weeks. The major side effect was neutropenia: Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in 5/14 patients. Other toxicities included nausea and vomiting, flulike symptoms, fever, rash and alopecia. Three patients had stable disease, but there were no responses observed. Amonafide at this dose and schedule has no activity in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Phase II study of biochemical modulation of fluorouracil by low-dose PALA in patients with colorectal cancer

Higher response rates in colorectal cancer have been observed with regimens that increase the cytotoxicity of fluorouracil (5-FU) by altering the biochemical milieu at its site(s) of action. Phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), which inhibits aspartate transcarbamylase and depletes uridine nucleotide pools in vitro and in vivo, selectively potentiates the antitumor activity of 5-FU in preclinical models. In a phase I/II study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, PALA 250 mg/m2 was given on day 1, followed 24 hours later by 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion repeated weekly. Through the use of subcutaneous ports and portable infusion pumps, all patients were treated outside the hospital setting. Thirty-nine patients without prior chemotherapy received 884 courses of treatment. The primary site was colon in 31, rectum in eight. Toxicity was generally mild to moderate except among four patients who were escalated to 5-FU 3,250 mg/m2: two developed severe gastrointestinal toxicity and myelosuppression. Among the remaining 35 patients, gastrointestinal and neurologic toxicities predominated, but usually did not develop until the third or fourth month of treatment. Two patients were inevaluable for response. Among the 37 evaluable patients there were three complete and 13 partial remissions for a total response rate of 43% (95% confidence interval [Cl], 27% to 59%). The median duration of response was 5 months (range, 1.5 to 15 months). The projected mean survival is in excess of 17 months. This high response rate is comparable to the best results obtained with other means of modulation of 5-FU. Demonstration of a survival benefit will require larger phase III studies.