Characteristics and Outcomes of Recipients of Heart Transplant with Coronarvirus Disease 2019 Who Received Casirivimab Plus Imdevimab Infusion

Purpose

Heart transplant (HT) recipient are at increased risk of adverse outcomes following COVID-19 infection and may benefit from monoclonal antibody infusion to mitigate progression to clinically severe disease. The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of HT patients who experienced mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with subsequent administration of casirivimab plus imdevimab administration.

Methods

A retrospective review of all HT recipients who were infected with COVID-19, and subsequently infused with monoclonal antibodies in a large academic medical center between January 1, 2021 to September 1, 2021.

Results

14 HT patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 57.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 41.5-64) years, 10 (71%) were men, and median time from HT was 3.48 (IQR, 1.00-11.82) years. Comorbid conditions included hypertension in 6 patients (43%), diabetes in 4 (29%), and chronic kidney disease in 6 (43%). Eight patients (57%) were previously vaccinated, predominantly with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Three participants (21%) were admitted after clinical progression of COVID-19. Among patients managed at the study institution, mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued in two patients (14%) and calcineurin inhibitor was maintained at previous levels in all fourteen patients (100%). Of the admitted patients, 1 was treated with high dose corticosteroids alone and 2 were treated with corticosteroids plus remdesivir. No patient required intubation. All 3 patients were discharged home and no patients in this cohort died.

Conclusion

In this single-center case series, HT patients with mild-moderate COVID-19 who were treated with monoclonal antibody infusion had a hospitalization rate of 21% and 100% survival. Further studies are required to optimize management of COVID-19 infection in the HT population.

Prospects for beyond the Standard Model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment: DUNE Collaboration

The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) will be a powerful tool for a variety of physics topics. The high-intensity proton beams provide a large neutrino flux, sampled by a near detector system consisting of a combination of capable precision detectors, and by the massive far detector system located deep underground. This configuration sets up DUNE as a machine for discovery, as it enables opportunities not only to perform precision neutrino measurements that may uncover deviations from the present three-flavor mixing paradigm, but also to discover new particles and unveil new interactions and symmetries beyond those predicted in the Standard Model (SM). Of the many potential beyond the Standard Model (BSM) topics DUNE will probe, this paper presents a selection of studies quantifying DUNE's sensitivities to sterile neutrino mixing, heavy neutral leptons, non-standard interactions, CPT symmetry violation, Lorentz invariance violation, neutrino trident production, dark matter from both beam induced and cosmogenic sources, baryon number violation, and other new physics topics that complement those at high-energy colliders and significantly extend the present reach.

Nonpharmacological interventions to reduce respiratory viral transmission: an evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

Viral respiratory infections are a leading cause of worldwide mortality and exert the potential to cause global socioeconomic crises. However, inexpensive, efficacious, and rapidly deployable strategies to reduce viral transmission are increasingly important in the setting of an ongoing pandemic, though not entirely understood. This article provides a comprehensive review of commonly employed nonpharmacological interventions to interrupt viral spread and provides evidence-based recommendations for their use.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review of three databases was performed. Studies with defined endpoints of subjects receiving one of five interventions (nasal washing, gargling, personal protective equipment (PPE), social distancing, and hand hygiene) were included. An evidence-based review of the highest level of evidence, with recommendations, was created in accordance with a previously described, rigorous, iterative process.

RESULTS

Fifty-four primary studies were included. The most commonly studied intervention was hand hygiene, followed by PPE, gargling, saline nasal washing, and social distancing.

CONCLUSIONS

Mask use and hand hygiene are strong recommendations for prevention of viral transmission. Donning gloves, gowns, and eye protection are a recommendation in healthcare settings. Saline nasal washing and gargling are options in selected populations. Although an aggregate level of evidence is not provided, the authors recommend social distancing.

Remote Monitoring of Heart Transplant Recipients during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic created significant challenges in monitoring heart transplant (HT) recipients for rejection due to efforts to minimize contact with the hospital setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transitioning HT patients to home phlebotomy and a monitoring protocol based on gene expression profiling (GEP) and donor derived cell free DNA (ddcfDNA).

Methods

A single-center cohort study that prospectively enrolled consecutive HT patients who were transitioned to a remote monitoring protocol employing home phlebotomy and non-invasive surveillance for rejection. Patients were enrolled starting at 2 months post-HT. Positive GEP values were defined as ≥32 (up to 6 months post-HT) and ≥34 (> 6 months post-HT). A positive ddcfDNA score was defined as >0.12%. A positive biopsy was defined as grade ≥1B/1R

Results

246 HT patients were enrolled and followed for a minimum of 3 months. Mean age was 56±14, 71.5% were male, and median time from transplant was 2.7 years. The average distance of patients from the hospital was 25.6 miles. 359 blood tests were drawn for detection of GEP and ddcfDNA and 102 biopsies performed (Figure). Among 32 patients who had negative results on both tests and had a biopsy, 0 had a positive biopsy. Of 25 patients who had positive results on both tests and had a biopsy, 3 (12%) had a positive biopsy. The biopsy positivity rate in patients who were GEP+/ddcfDNA- was 6% and in patients who were GEP-/ddcfDNA+ was 8%. None of the positive biopsies were associated with hemodynamic compromise. 15 (6%) of patients were admitted due to allograft rejection during the study period. There were no deaths.

Conclusion

Using a remote monitoring protocol with home phlebotomy and noninvasive rejection surveillance was feasible and safe in HT recipients. In this cohort, the combination of negative GEP and ddcfDNA scores was accurate at predicting a lack of allograft rejection.