Forehead reflectance photoplethysmography to monitor heart rate: preliminary results from neonatal patients

Around 5%-10% of newborn babies require some form of resuscitation at birth and heart rate (HR) is the best guide of efficacy. We report the development and first trial of a device that continuously monitors neonatal HR, with a view to deployment in the delivery room to guide newborn resuscitation. The device uses forehead reflectance photoplethysmography (PPG) with modulated light and lock-in detection. Forehead fixation has numerous advantages including ease of sensor placement, whilst perfusion at the forehead is better maintained in comparison to the extremities. Green light (525 nm) was used, in preference to the more usual red or infrared wavelengths, to optimize the amplitude of the pulsatile signal. Experimental results are presented showing simultaneous PPG and electrocardiogram (ECG) HRs from babies (n = 77), gestational age 26-42 weeks, on a neonatal intensive care unit. In babies ⩾32 weeks gestation, the median reliability was 97.7% at ±10 bpm and the limits of agreement (LOA) between PPG and ECG were +8.39 bpm and -8.39 bpm. In babies <32 weeks gestation, the median reliability was 94.8% at ±10 bpm and the LOA were +11.53 bpm and -12.01 bpm. Clinical evaluation during newborn deliveries is now underway.

Abstract P1-15-02: Long term follow-up of the neo-adjuvant pilot trial evaluating activity of letrozole in combination with bevacizumab in post-menopausal women with newly diagnosed estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive primary breast cancer

Introduction: Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression has been associated with resistance to anti-estrogen therapy (Cancer Res 2008; 68: 6232); our preclinical data showed that anti-VEGF therapy reverse resistance to estrogen therapy. We postulated that anti-VEGF therapy would enhance anti-estrogen therapy and thus designed a pilot study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant letrozole and bevacizumab in post-menopausal women with stage II/III, ER/PR positive breast cancer.

Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were treated with a neo-adjuvant regimen of letrozole, 2.5 mg/day (PO) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks (IV) for a total of 24 weeks prior to surgical treatment of their breast cancer. Patients were followed for toxicity at three week intervals and for tumor assessment at 6 week intervals. Research tumor biopsies were taken before and 6 weeks after initiation of therapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete remission (pCR). Patients with inflammatory breast cancer were excluded.

Results: Twenty six patients were enrolled and 25 were treated (one patient had a TIA the day before initiation of therapy). The regimen was well tolerated with 2 patients taken off-study due to uncontrolled hypertension. Objective clinical response occurred in 68% of the patients (17/25), 16% with CR and 52% with partial response (PR). Sixteen percent of the patients (4/25) had clinical stable disease (SD) and 2 patients progressed (PD) while on therapy. Three patients had pCR and 1 patient had microscopic residual tumor cells in the LNs but not in the breast (pCR 16%). Thirty two percent of the patients attained stage 0 or 1 status. None of the pCR patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and none have relapsed after a median follow-up of 6.1 years (range, 5.8+ to 7.5+). Eight of the 13 patients with PR did not receive chemotherapy and only one relapsed with a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 3.7 to 7.7+). At a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 88% of the patients have not relapsed and 12% relapsed (1 PD [basal-like], 1 PR [Luminal B], 1 SD [HER2] relapsed at 1.7, 4, and 6.8 years respectively). Of the 17 patients with CR and PR, only 1 has relapsed (6%). Next Generation Sequencing Analysis and evaluation of markers of proliferation/apoptosis are underway.

Conclusion: Combination neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole and bevacizumab was well tolerated and resulted in an impressive pCR of 16%. At a median of 6.4 years, the relapse free survival is 88% for all comers and 94% for responding patients (Luminal A and B). Full correlation of clinical and genomic/biomarker analysis will be presented at the time of the meeting. This encouraging data has led The Breast Cancer Translational Research Consortium to complete a randomized phase II trial (TBCRC002) of letrozole ± bevacizumab in this patient population.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-15-02.

Abstract P3-03-03: A tri-modality imaging assessment algorithm to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy response in patients with operable breast cancer

Background: To determine the negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of a pre-surgical tri-modality imaging assessment algorithm to determine complete pathologic response (pCR) post neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and pre-surgical breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US) and mammography between 2004 and 2010 at our institution. Tri-modality imaging was reviewed by a single blinded breast radiologist and evaluated for predetermined modality specific parameters as defined in Table 1. The NPV, PPV, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated on the basis of the final surgical pathology report with a complete pathologic response in the breast defined as no residual invasive disease or in situ disease.

Results. Eighty-three tumors in 83 patients with a mean age of 50 (range 27–70) were evaluated. Twenty-three patients had a pCR. The NPV, PPV, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of tri-modality imaging algorithm for pCR were 0.87, 0.95, 0.95, 0.87 and 0.93 utilizing a cut-point of ≤ 5 for complete response by imaging. The mean score for patients with pCR was 4.61 (range 3–10) with 3 patients scoring above 5. The mean score for patients with residual disease was 7.73 (range 5–11).

Conclusions: A tri-modality imaging scoring algorithm is predictive of complete pathologic response. This algorithm will be tested in a developing prospective trial that will also assess the additive value of tumor bed biopsy in patients who achieve a score of 5 or less.

Abstract P5-17-07: Influence of bevacizumab on local-regional recurrence in triple negative breast cancer

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 15–20% of newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers and has been associated with an elevated risk of both local-regional recurrence (LRR) as well as distant failure. Bevacizumab (BEV) has been shown to improve pathologic complete response rates in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), but its effect on LRR remains undefined. This study reports the impact of adding BEV to standard breast cancer therapy in TNBC patients treated at a single institution.

Methods: One hundred and eighty-five consecutive TNBC patients treated at the University of Alabama Birmingham from May 2005 to August 2010 were reviewed. Thirty-one TNBC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and BEV on prospective studies were matched (1:2) with 62 TNBC patients treated with CT alone, controlling for age, stage, and use of radiation (RT). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate LRR, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), and cohorts were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and the 2-sided log-rank test.

Results: Mean age was 47 and 46 years in the cohorts with and without BEV, respectively. Stage in each cohort was as follows: 32% stage I, 61% stage II, and 7% stage III. Use of adjuvant RT was 81% in each cohort (25/31 BEV, 50/62 no BEV). BEV was delivered with NCT in 17 patients (55%) and with adjuvant CT in the remaining 14 patients (45%). Eleven patients (35%) completed an additional 1 year of maintenance therapy with BEV. LRR occurred in 2 (6%) patients treated with BEV vs. 16 (26%) treated with CT alone (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.06–1.07, p = 0.04). Distant recurrence occurred in 3 (10%) patients treated with BEV vs. 11 (18%) patients in the CT group HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.2–1.8, p = 0.48). There were 2 (6%) deaths in the BEV group vs. 12 (19%) in the CT alone group (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.13–2.3, p = 0.19).

Conclusions: In a matched-pair analysis of TNBC patients, the addition of BEV to conventional breast cancer management was associated with a reduction in LRR. Further prospective study is necessary to examine the impact of BEV on local-regional control in TNBC.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-17-07.

Verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: cohort study for the UK

OBJECTIVES

The verteporfin photodynamic therapy (VPDT) cohort study aimed to answer five questions: (a) is VPDT in the NHS provided as in randomised trials?; (b) is 'outcome' the same in the nhs as in randomised trials?; (c) is 'outcome' the same for patients ineligible for randomised trials?; (d) is VPDT safe when provided in the NHS?; and (e) how effective and cost-effective is VPDT?

DESIGN

Treatment register.

SETTING

All hospitals providing VPDT in the NHS.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients attending VPDT clinics.

INTERVENTIONS

Infusion of verteporfin followed by infrared laser exposure is called VPDT, and is used to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The VPDT cohort study advised clinicians to follow patients every 3 months during treatment or active observation, retreating based on criteria used in the previous commercial 'TAP' (Treatment of Age-related macular degeneration with Photodynamic therapy) trials of VPDT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes were adverse reactions and events; morphological changes in treated nAMD (wet) lesions; and for a subset of patients, 6-monthly contrast sensitivity, generic and visual health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and resource use. Treated eyes were classified as eligible for the TAP trials (EFT), ineligible (IFT) or unclassifiable (UNC).

RESULTS

Forty-seven hospitals submitted data for 8323 treated eyes in 7748 patients; 4919 eyes in 4566 patients were treated more than 1 year before the last data submission or had completed treatment. Of 4043 eyes with nAMD in 4043 patients, 1227 were classified as EFT, 1187 as IFT and 1629 as UNC. HRQoL and resource use data were available for about 2000 patients. The mean number of treatments in years 1 and 2 was 2.3 and 0.4 respectively. About 50% of eyes completed treatment within 1 year. BCVA deterioration in year 1 did not differ between eligibility groups. EFT eyes lost 11.6 letters (95% confidence interval 10.1 to 13.0 letters) compared with 9.9 letters in VPDT-treated eyes in the TAP trials. EFT eyes had poorer BCVA at baseline than IFT and UNC eyes. Adverse reactions and events were reported for 1.4% of first visits - less frequently than those reported in the TAP trials. Associations between BCVA in the best-seeing eye with HRQoL and community health and social care resource use showed that the 11-letter difference in BCVA between VPDT and sham treatment in the TAP trials corresponded to differences in utility of 0.012 and health and social service costs of £60 and £92 in years 1 and 2, respectively. VPDT provided an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of £170,000 over 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

VPDT was administered less frequently than in the TAP trials, with less than half of those treated followed up for > 1 year in routine clinical practice. Deterioration in BCVA over time in EFT eyes was similar to that in the TAP trials. The similar falls in BCVA after VPDT across the pre-defined TAP eligibility groups do not mean that the treatment is equally effective in these groups because deterioration in BCVA can be influenced by the parameters that determined group membership. Safety was no worse than in the TAP trials. The estimated cost per QALY was similar to the highest previous estimate. Although VPDT is no longer in use as monotherapy for neovascular AMD, its role as adjunctive treatment has not been fully explored. VPDT also has potential as monotherapy in the management of vascular malformations of the retina and choroid and with trials underway in neovascularisation due to myopia and polypoidal choroidopathy.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

P3-14-26: The Effect of Biologic Subtype in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A UAB Experience

Purpose: Previous studies have suggested that the pre treatment clinical stage drives loco-regional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM) and survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This retrospective analysis was performed to look at the effect of biologic subtype on patient outcomes.

Methods: Between 1999 and 2005, 115 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and +/−radiation therapy at UAB were identified. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were recorded. Pathologic complete response was defined as resolution of both invasive disease and DCIS in both the primary and nodal disease. Survival was measured using the Kaplan Meier statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses of covariates associated with LRR, DM, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. Results: The mean age was 49 years, with a mean follow-up of 5.8 years. Subtype distribution was as follows: 52 luminal A, 17 luminal B, 36 triple negative, 9 Her2+ and one patient with an unknown biologic subtype. Distribution of clinical stage was as follows: 40 IIA, 34 IIB, 26 IIIA, 10 IIIB, and 5 IIIC. Tumors were down-staged following neoadjuvant therapy as follows: 18: pCR, 6: residual DCIS, 17: I, 38: IIA, 11: IIB, 13: IIIA, 5: IIIB, and 7: IIIC. Pre-treatment clinical stage did not significantly influence LRR, DM or progression free and overall survival; however, final pathologic T, N and group stage were associated with both progression free, p=0.003, 0.011, 0.005 and overall survival, p=0.02, 0.037, and 0.009. Complete resolution of tumor by mammographic or MR imaging to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, was associated with an increased overall survival, p=0.0025. Univariate analysis did not show a significant effect of biologic subtype, age, grade, use of radiation therapy or anti-hormonal therapy.

Discussion: In this retrospective series, response to chemotherapy and the final pathologic stage, representing the volume of residual disease, were important predictors of survival. Further study to determine factors predictive of chemotherapy response is needed.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-14-26.

P3-07-06: Prognostic Utility of Upfront Nodal Staging Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: The UAB Experience

Purpose: Controversy exists regarding the prognostic utility of upfront lymph node staging in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This retrospective study explores whether upfront verses outback nodal staging influenced locoregional control and survival endpoints. Methods: Between 1999 and 2005 one hundred and fifteen patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at UAB were identified. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were recorded. Timing of nodal assessment was based on either surgeon preference or stipulated upfront per several clinical protocols. Survival was measured using the Kaplan Meier statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses of covariates associated with local-regional control (LRC), progressionfree (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. Results: Mean age was 49 years and mean follow-up was 5.8 years. Stage distribution was as follows: 40 IIA, 34 IIB, 26 IIIA, 10 IIIB, and 5 IIIC. Definitive surgery included breast conservation in 49 patients, total mastectomy in 21 and modified radical mastectomy in 44. Seventy-two patients had upfront nodal sampling before neoadjuvant therapy, 36 by fine needle assessment and the remainder by sentinel node biopsy. Forty-three patients had their nodal assessment following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of those with upfront nodal staging: forty nine patients had a positive nodal result and 23 had negative findings. In those that were sampled at the time of definitive surgery: 21 had positive results, 21 had a negative result, and 1 patient did not have any nodes in the specimen. One hundred five patients had post-operative radiation therapy. Overall there was no difference in LRC, PFS or OS outcomes between patients that had an upfront nodal staging procedure and those that had their nodes sampled at the time of definitive surgery. Patients achieving pCR had a non-significant trend towards improved overall survival (p=0.12). Final pathologic T, N and group stage were statistically significant in determining the progression free, p=0.003, 0.011, 0.005 and overall survival, p=0.02, 0.037, and 0.009. Lymphovascular space invasion was associated with progression free survival on univariate analysis, p=0.0179, but not multivariate analysis. Other covariates including age, biologic subtype, grade, type of chemotherapy, use of radiation therapy, radiation volume, time to complete radiation therapy, and use of hormonal therapy did not affect outcomes. Discussion: Upfront as compared with outback lymph node staging did not influence locoregional control or survival endpoints. Final pathologic stage and not initial clinical stage remains the most important prognostic factor associated with survival.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-06.

Two-stage method to remove population- and individual-level outliers from longitudinal data in a primary care database

PURPOSE: In the UK, primary care databases include repeated measurements of health indicators at the individual level. As these databases encompass a large population, some individuals have extreme values, but some values may also be recorded incorrectly. The challenge for researchers is to distinguish between records that are due to incorrect recording and those which represent true but extreme values. This study evaluated different methods to identify outliers. METHODS: Ten percent of practices were selected at random to evaluate the recording of 513,367 height measurements. Population-level outliers were identified using boundaries defined using Health Survey for England data. Individual-level outliers were identified by fitting a random-effects model with subject-specific slopes for height measurements adjusted for age and sex. Any height measurements with a patient-level standardised residual more extreme than ±10 were identified as an outlier and excluded. The model was subsequently refitted twice after removing outliers at each stage. This method was compared with existing methods of removing outliers. RESULTS: Most outliers were identified at the population level using the boundaries defined using Health Survey for England (1550 of 1643). Once these were removed from the database, fitting the random-effects model to the remaining data successfully identified only 75 further outliers. This method was more efficient at identifying true outliers compared with existing methods. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a new, two-stage approach in identifying outliers in longitudinal data and show that it can successfully identify outliers at both population and individual level. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Identification of risk factors by systematic review and development of risk-adjusted models for surgical site infection

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are complications of surgery that cause significant postoperative morbidity. SSI has been proposed as a potential indicator of the quality of care in the context of clinical governance and monitoring of the performance of NHS organisations against targets.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to address a number of objectives. Firstly, identify risk factors for SSI, criteria for stratifying surgical procedures and evidence about the importance of postdischarge surveillance (PDS). Secondly, test the importance of risk factors for SSI in surveillance databases and investigate interactions between risk factors. Thirdly, investigate and validate different definitions of SSI. Lastly, develop models for making risk-adjusted comparisons between hospitals.

DATA SOURCES

A single hospital surveillance database was used to address objectives 2 and 3 and the UK Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Service database to address objective 4.

STUDY DESIGN

There were four elements to the research: (1) systematic reviews of risk factors for SSI (two reviewers assessed titles and abstracts of studies identified by the search strategy and the quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale); (2) assessment of agreement between four SSI definitions; (3) validation of definitions of SSI, quantifying their ability to predict clinical outcomes; and (4) development of operation-specific risk models for SSI, with hospitals fitted as random effects.

RESULTS

Reviews of SSI risk factors other than established SSI risk indices identified other risk; some were operation specific, but others applied to multiple operations. The factor most commonly identified was duration of preoperative hospital stay. The review of PDS for SSI confirmed the need for PDS if SSIs are to be compared meaningfully over time within an institution. There was wide variation in SSI rate (SSI%) using different definitions. Over twice as many wounds were classified as infected by one definition only as were classified as infected by both. Different SSI definitions also classified different wounds as being infected. The two most established SSI definitions had broadly similar ability to predict the chosen clinical outcomes. This finding is paradoxical given the poor agreement between definitions. Elements of each definition not common to both may be important in predicting clinical outcomes or outcomes may depend on only a subset of elements which are common to both. Risk factors fitted in multivariable models and their effects, including age and gender, varied by surgical procedure. Operative duration was an important risk factor for all operations, except for hip replacement. Wound class was included least often because some wound classes were not applicable to all operations or were combined because of small numbers. The American Association of Anesthesiologists class was a consistent risk factor for most operations.

CONCLUSIONS

The research literature does not allow surgery-specific or generic risk factors to be defined. SSI definitions varied between surveillance programmes and potentially between hospitals. Different definitions do not have good agreement, but the definitions have similar ability to predict outcomes influenced by SSI. Associations between components of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index and odds of SSI varied for different surgical procedures. There was no evidence for effect modification by hospital. Estimates of SSI% should be disseminated within institutions to inform infection control. Estimates of SSI% across institutions or countries should be interpreted cautiously and should not be assumed to reflect quality of medical care. Future research should focus on developing an SSI definition that has satisfactory psychometric properties, that can be applied in everyday clinical settings, includes PDS and is formulated to detect SSIs that are important to patients or health services.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Technology Assessment programme.

Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: an efficient method for time-pressed evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Recent legislation in the United States provides strong incentives for implementation of electronic health records (EHRs). The ensuing transformation in U.S. health care will increase demand for new methods to evaluate clinical informatics interventions. Timeline constraints and a rapidly changing environment will make traditional evaluation techniques burdensome. This paper describes an anthropological approach that provides a fast and flexible way to evaluate clinical information systems.

METHODS

Adapting mixed-method evaluation approaches from anthropology, we describe a rapid assessment process (RAP) for assessing clinical informatics interventions in health care that we developed and used during seven site visits to diverse community hospitals and primary care settings in the U.S.

SETTING

Our multidisciplinary team used RAP to evaluate factors that either encouraged people to use clinical decision support (CDS) systems or interfered with use of these systems in settings ranging from large urban hospitals to single-practitioner, private family practices in small towns.

RESULTS

Critical elements of the method include: 1) developing a fieldwork guide; 2) carefully selecting observation sites and participants; 3) thoroughly preparing for site visits; 4) partnering with local collaborators; 5) collecting robust data by using multiple researchers and methods; and 6) analyzing and reporting data in a structured manner helpful to the organizations being evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

RAP, iteratively developed over the course of visits to seven clinical sites across the U.S., has succeeded in allowing a multidisciplinary team of informatics researchers to plan, gather and analyze data, and report results in a maximally efficient manner.

Abstract P1-12-04: Long Term Follow-Up of a Pilot Trial of Pre-Operative (Neoadjuvant) Letrozole in Combination with Bevacizumab in Post-Menopausal Women with Newly Diagnosed Estrogen and/or Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Introduction: Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in breast cancer tumors has been associated with resistance to anti-estrogen adjuvant therapy. We designed a pilot study of neoadjuvant letrozole and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) to assess feasibility and short term efficacy in post-menopausal women with stage II/III, ER/PR positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with a neoadjuvant regimen of letrozole, 2.5 mg/day (PO) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks (IV) for a total of 24 weeks prior to surgical treatment of their breast cancer. Patients were followed for toxicity at three week intervals and tumor assessment (physical exam and tumor ultrasound) at six week intervals. Results: Twenty-five evaluable patients were treated. The regimen was well tolerated except for two patients who were taken off-study for difficult to control hypertension. Objective clinical response occurred in 17/25 patients (68%) including 16% CR and 52% PR. The four patients with clinical CR had pathologic CR in their breasts (16%) although one had residual tumor cells in axillary nodes. Two of the 17 responding patients were lost to follow-up; with a median follow-up of 50 months, no relapses have been seen in the 15 responsive patients, including 10 patients who received no adjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients with progressive disease at 9 and 16 weeks received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and radiation. One of these patients relapsed at 35 months and the other is NED at 44 months. Four patients had stable disease and all received adjuvant chemotherapy; one patient relapsed at 25 months, and the reminder are NED at 44-52 months. Overall, 2 out of 21 patients with adequate follow-up had disease reoccurrence (9.5%) at a median follow-up of 45 months. Conclusion: Combination neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole and bevacizumab was well tolerated and resulted in impressive clinical and pathologic responses. Data suggest that patients having an objective response to neoadjuvant therapy had excellent 4 year disease-free survival (100%) while relapsed occurred in 2 out of 6 patients who failed to have an objective response despite additional neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Breast Cancer Translational Research Consortium has an ongoing randomized phase II trial of letrozole ± bevacizumab in this patient population.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-04.

Abstract P4-11-04: The Influence of Radiation on Survival in Patients with Triple Negative Stage II Breast Cancer

Background: Prospective trials of locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiation (RT) have demonstrated a survival advantage; however, use of postmastectomy RT in stage II patients is controversial. This study explores the possibility that patients with aggressive variant molecular subtypes [triple receptor negative (TN)] treated with modern chemotherapy, may experience a survival benefit from adjuvant RT.

Methods: Billing codes for all breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy between 1/1998 and 5/2005 at the University of Alabama at Birmingham were reviewed to comprehensively capture all Stage II and III patients with intact data. Patient, tumor, and treatment related variables were recorded and patients were divided into 3 molecular subtypes based on receptor status: hormone receptor (HR) positive, Her2 negative; HR+/− , Her2+; and TN. Kaplan Meier curves to assess survival were performed by dividing the TN group into 2 groups: those who did or did not receive adjuvant RT.

Results: 409 patients with stage II-III disease with were identified. Out of this group, 81 patients had TN breast cancer (60 Stage II and 21 Stage III). RT data was known in 79 of these patients. Median age was 49 years. Median follow-up was 72 months. Thirty-seven stage II and 18 stage III patients received adjuvant RT. Of the stage II patients who received radiation, 25 underwent lumpectomy and 11 underwent mastectomy. Stage II patients who received adjuvant RT had a statistically significant improvement in DFS (p=0.03), and had a trend towards improvement in OS (p=0.07) when compared with those who did not receive adjuvant RT. There was no significant difference in survival for the stage III patients with use of RT, however numbers in this group were small. Conclusion: Adjuvant RT was associated with an improvement in DFS and a trend towards improvement in OS in patients with Stage II, TN breast cancers treated with modern chemotherapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-04.

Abstract P5-10-19: The Influence of Time to Completion of Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients with Triple Negative Stage III Breast Cancer

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly delivered to facilitate breast conserving surgery through tumor downstaging. Prospective trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy from the NSABP suggest no difference in survival outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy; however, subset analysis in 2 combined trials (B-18 and B-27) demonstrated a trend in DFS improvement in young patients (&lt;50 yrs), who often have more aggressive variant tumors. This study explores the possibility that patients with aggressive variant molecular subtypes [triple receptor negative (TN)] treated with modern chemotherapy, may significantly benefit from earlier completion of drug delivery. Methods: Billing codes for all breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy between 1/1998 and 5/2005 at the University of Alabama at Birmingham were reviewed to comprehensively capture all Stage II and III patients with intact data. Patient, tumor, and treatment related variables were recorded and patients were divided to 4 molecular subtypes based on receptor status: hormone receptor (HR) positive, Her2 negative; HR+/− , Her2+; and triple receptor negative (TN). Kaplan Meier curves to assess survival were performed by dividing the TN group into 2 groups: those completing chemotherapy ≥5 vs &gt; 5 months from diagnosis. Results: 409 patients with Stage II-III disease with were identified: 124 received neoadjuvant and 285 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Out of this group, 81 patients had TN breast cancer (60 Stage II and 21 Stage III). Median age was 49 years. Median follow-up was 72 months. Chemotherapy consisted of adriamycin, taxol and cytoxan for a median of 9 cycles. Stage III patients who completed chemotherapy within 5 months had a statistically significant improvement in OS and DFS (p=0.03), and had a trend towards improvement in DMFS (p=0.10) when compared with those who took longer than 5 months to complete chemotherapy. Conclusion: Completion of chemotherapy in a shorter time interval in patients with Stage III, TN breast cancers was associated with an improvement in DFS and OS. Consideration of timing of chemotherapy warrants further study.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-10-19.