A comparison of clinical-pathological characteristics between symptomatic and interval breast cancer

BACKGROUND

An association between interval breast cancers (cancer detected after a normal mammogram and before the next scheduled mammogram) and tumour aggressiveness has been postulated which may reflect their relatively poor overall prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate known prognostic features of screen detected breast cancers compared to interval breast cancers.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2010 and 2013 at a single unit of the National Breast Screening Program (NBSP) in Ireland and those between the ages of 50 and 65 diagnosed at a symptomatic breast clinic were included in the study. Patients who had not had a screening mammogram within the proceeding two years or had a previous history of breast cancer were excluded. Data were retrospectively collected on patient demographics, tumour type, grade, hormone receptor status and stage of disease at presentation.

RESULTS

There were 915 patients included in the study, with 92% (n = 844) diagnosed through the NBSP. Ductal carcinoma in-situ accounted for 19% (n = 160) of screen-detected breast cancers but only 2.8% of interval cancers (p < 0.05). The most common type of invasive cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma. Tumour grade was significantly higher in interval breast cancers (p < 0.05). Interval cancers were identified at a significantly higher stage (Stage 1 versus 2; p < 0.001) than screen-detected cancers. Interval breast cancers were less likely to be ER positive (76% versus 81%; p < 0.05) and significantly more likely to over-express HER2 (20% vs 10%, p < 0.05) than screen-detected cancers.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the fact that interval cancers appear to have a number of adverse prognostic markers for overall breast cancer survival when compared to women with screen-detected breast cancers. Interval cancers were more likely to be invasive, of a higher grade and stage and with a greater predominance of HER2 and triple negative molecular subtypes. Therefore this heterogeneous group of tumours may be biologically more aggressive and account disproportionately to overall breast cancer mortality.

Targeted prostate cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the initial screening round of the IMPACT study

BACKGROUND

Men with germline breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) or breast cancer 2, early onset (BRCA2) gene mutations have a higher risk of developing prostate cancer (PCa) than noncarriers. IMPACT (Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls) is an international consortium of 62 centres in 20 countries evaluating the use of targeted PCa screening in men with BRCA1/2 mutations.

OBJECTIVE

To report the first year's screening results for all men at enrollment in the study.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We recruited men aged 40-69 yr with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and a control group of men who have tested negative for a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation known to be present in their families. All men underwent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing at enrollment, and those men with PSA >3 ng/ml were offered prostate biopsy.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

PSA levels, PCa incidence, and tumour characteristics were evaluated. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the number of PCa cases among groups and the differences among disease types.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We recruited 2481 men (791 BRCA1 carriers, 531 BRCA1 controls; 731 BRCA2 carriers, 428 BRCA2 controls). A total of 199 men (8%) presented with PSA >3.0 ng/ml, 162 biopsies were performed, and 59 PCas were diagnosed (18 BRCA1 carriers, 10 BRCA1 controls; 24 BRCA2 carriers, 7 BRCA2 controls); 66% of the tumours were classified as intermediate- or high-risk disease. The positive predictive value (PPV) for biopsy using a PSA threshold of 3.0 ng/ml in BRCA2 mutation carriers was 48%-double the PPV reported in population screening studies. A significant difference in detecting intermediate- or high-risk disease was observed in BRCA2 carriers. Ninety-five percent of the men were white, thus the results cannot be generalised to all ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The IMPACT screening network will be useful for targeted PCa screening studies in men with germline genetic risk variants as they are discovered. These preliminary results support the use of targeted PSA screening based on BRCA genotype and show that this screening yields a high proportion of aggressive disease.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this report, we demonstrate that germline genetic markers can be used to identify men at higher risk of prostate cancer. Targeting screening at these men resulted in the identification of tumours that were more likely to require treatment.

Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Adolescents in English care: randomised trial and observational cohort evaluation

BACKGROUND

Children in care often have poor outcomes. There is a lack of evaluative research into intervention options.

AIMS

To examine the efficacy of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Adolescents (MTFC-A) compared with usual care for young people at risk in foster care in England.

METHOD

A two-arm single (assessor) blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) embedded within an observational quasi-experimental case-control study involving 219 young people aged 11-16 years (trial registration: ISRCTN 68038570). The primary outcome was the Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Secondary outcomes were ratings of educational attendance, achievement and rate of offending.

RESULTS

The MTFC-A group showed a non-significant improvement in CGAS outcome in both the randomised cohort (n = 34, adjusted mean difference 1.3, 95% CI -7.1 to 9.7, P = 0.75) and in the trimmed observational cohort (n = 185, adjusted mean difference 0.95, 95% CI -2.38 to 4.29, P = 0.57). No significant effects were seen in secondary outcomes. There was a possible differential effect of the intervention according to antisocial behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence that the use of MTFC-A resulted in better outcomes than usual care. The intervention may be more beneficial for young people with antisocial behaviour but less beneficial than usual treatment for those without.

Abstract P1-01-01: The value of isosulphan blue dye in addition to isotope scanning in the identification of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients with a positive lymphoscintigraphy: A randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 98849733)

Introduction

The advent of multimodal and targeted breast cancer treatment has seen a radical shift from aggressive surgical intervention to a more minimalist approach, both within the breast and axilla. Primary among these changes is the utilisation of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to detect disease within the axilla and a move away from an obligatory axillary clearance when the sentinel node is positive. This depends on the accurate identification of the SLN and initial studies describe a higher identification rate and a lower false negative rate with a dual tracer identification technique. This encompasses a combination of a blue / green dye and radio-labelled isotope. The use of blue dye has been, of itself, associated with significant morbidity and therefore many clinicians may opt for single tracer identification.

Aims

The aim of the current study was to determine whether the addition of blue dye to radio-isotope increased the positive SLN detection rate, where the SLN was identified pre-operatively on a lymphoscintigram.

Methods

A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the combined techniques of isosulphan blue dye and isotope scanning versus isotope scanning alone was performed at a single tertiary referral centre. Ethical approval was obtained prior to commencing the study from the hospital ethics committee. Enrolment commenced in March 2010 and ceased in September 2012. The study design was a randomised open label controlled parallel group trial. The primary outcome measure was the effect of the omission of the blue dye on the identification of SLN if the lymphoscintigram was positive (1 -3 nodes identified).

Results

A total of 673 patients were included in the final analysis with 344 patients receiving the combination (blue dye and radio-isotope) and 329 patients who received radio-isotope scanning alone. The groups were evenly matched both demographically and pathologically. The mean age was 48 years (48.3 versus 47.7 years; P = 0.47), the mean tumour size was 23.1mm (23.2mm versus 23.0mm; p = 0.89) and there was no statistically significant difference in the grade of the tumours between the two groups (p = 0.58). Overall, there was no difference in the number of nodes retrieved between the two groups (563 versus 523; p = 0.30). Similarly, there was no difference in the number of positive lymph nodes that were identified between the two groups (107 versus 98; 23.8% versus 22%; p = 0.65).

Conclusions

The addition of isosulphan blue dye does not aid in the identification of the SLN in patients who have a positive lymphoscintigram when radioisotope colloid is used.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-01-01.

Abstract P2-18-05: Axillary nodal burden in patients with a positive pre-operative ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology

Introduction

Recent years have seen a dramatic shift to more conservative management of the axilla and the presence of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy does not now automatically mandate an axillary clearance. This is based largely on data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z11 study, which failed to demonstrate a difference in local recurrence or overall survival when an axillary clearance was omitted in a highly selective group of patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. However, the presence of a positive pre-operative ultrasound guided axillary FNAC(Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology) may be representative of a higher burden of axillary disease.

Aim

Therefore, the aims of this study were firstly to quantify the actual nodal burden in breast cancer patients with a positive pre-operative ultrasound guided axillary FNAC and secondly to identify the number of patients who may have been spared an axillary clearance based on Z11 eligibility criteria.

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database within a tertiary breast cancer referral centre was performed. All patients with a positive pre-operative axillary FNAC were identified within a five year period (2007 – 2011). Demographic, tumour and biological characteristics and final nodal status were analysed. Eligibility for randomisation according to the Z11 criteria was assessed based on the final pathology and the number of patients who could have been spared an axillary clearance was identified.

Results

A total of 360 patients were identified with a positive axillary ultrasound guided FNAC. Sixty-three patients had no axillary surgery and three patients had recurrent disease, leaving a total of 294 for analysis. The mean age was 56 years (range 22 – 87). The mean size of the tumour was 31.3mm (range 4mm – 132mm) and the majority were an invasive grade 3 (57%) ductal carcinoma (84%). Luminal A (63%) was the commonest sub-type. The mean number of nodes removed at axillary clearance was 24 (range 7 – 58) while the mean number of positive nodes excised was 6 (range 0 – 47). Of these, the mean number of level I positive nodes was 4, level II was 1 and level III nodes was &lt;1.

Overall a total of 78 patients had less than three positive nodes identified in the axilla and potentially may have been eligible for the Z11 study. However, when patients who had a mastectomy, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded and the presence of extra-capsular nodal involvement was accounted for only 19 (6.4%) patients may have been spared an axillary clearance.

Conclusions

The presence of nodal positivity on a pre-operative FNAC is associated with a higher burden of axillary disease. Only a minority of these patients would be able to avoid an axillary clearance in the setting of the recent Z11 study. Performing an axillary ultrasound and FNAC of suspicious nodes allows patients to avoid an unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy and proceed directly to an axillary clearance.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-18-05.