Abstract OT3-02-02: PATHWAY: Asian, multicenter, phase 3 trial of tamoxifen with or without palbociclib ± goserelin in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND:

The incidence rates of breast cancer (BC) in Asian counties have been rising rapidly. The age-specific female BC incidence rates peak before menopause (around 40-50 years of age) in Asia, however treatment options for pre/perimenopausal patients are limited. Palbociclib (P) is an oral novel cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. The addition of P to endocrine therapy (ET) such as aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant has been demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) in phase 3 studies PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3. This study is designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of P plus tamoxifen (TAM) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic BC regardless of menopausal status. This study is conducted as a Clinical Research Collaboration by National Cancer Center Hospital with research funding from Pfizer.

TRIAL DESIGN:

PATHWAY/NCCH1607 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 study. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either P (125 mg once daily, days1-21 of a 28-day cycle) or placebo in combination with TAM (20 mg once daily, continuously). Pre/perimenopausal women should receive concurrent ovarian function suppression with goserelin. Randomization will be stratified by prior ET for advanced/metastatic BC (1st line ET vs. 2nd line ET) and menopausal status (pre/perimenopausal vs. postmenopausal).

KEY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

Eligible patients include women of any menopausal status with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic BC; candidates to receive TAM as 1st line or 2nd line ET for advanced/metastatic disease; ≥18 years of age; measurable or non-measurable disease (RECIST v.1.1); ECOG performance status 0-1; adequate organ function; have not received treatment with TAM (except for patients who have had more than 12 months from completion of adjuvant therapy with TAM); and have not received any CDK4/6 or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) - mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors.

SPECIFIC AIMS:

The primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by the investigator. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), 1, 2, and 3-year survival probabilities, objective response (OR), duration of response, clinical benefit rate (CBR), pharmacokinetics, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.

STATISTICAL METHODS:

The sample size was determined to detect a 38% reduction in the hazard of disease progression or death in P plus TAM arm with a 1-sided significance level of 2.5% and power of 80%. A stratified log rank test will be used to compare PFS between the 2 treatment arms.

PRESENT ACCRUAL AND TARGET ACCRUAL:

Target accrual of 180 patients will be enrolled within 23 sites among Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. As of June 2018, 46 patients have been enrolled.

CONTACT INFORMATION:

This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03423199 and UMIN000030816. For more information, email NCCH1607_office@ml.res.ncc.go.jp

Citation Format: Noguchi E, Hata T, Nakamura K, Kuchiba A, Hayashi M, Hamada A, Yonemori K, Sohn J, Lu Y-S, Yap Y-S, Fujiwara Y, Tamura K. PATHWAY: Asian, multicenter, phase 3 trial of tamoxifen with or without palbociclib ± goserelin in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-02.

Abstract P3-10-09: Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and response to pembrolizumab (Pembro)+chemotherapy (Chemo) as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 trial

Background:Increasing quantities of stromal TILs (sTILs) are associated with higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with conventional chemo in early-stage TNBC. We evaluated the association between sTILs and PD-L1 expression with response to pembro+chemo as NAT for TNBC in the KEYNOTE-173 trial (NCT02622074).

Methods: sTILs were quantified using light microscopy of H&E-stained slides from pretreatment and on-treatment (during first 3 weeks of pembro monotherapy) tumor biopsies by a pathologist blind to response data. Pretreatment PD-L1 expression was assessed using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay and reported as combined positive score (CPS). Endpoints were pCR rate by ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis ypN0 and objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) after the first 4 cycles of NAT (taxane±carboplatin+pembro) by MRI. sTILs and PD-L1 CPS were evaluated as continuous variables. Association between sTILs and PD-L1 CPS with response was assessed using logistic regression and area under the reciever operating curve (AUROC) analyses, with a 1-sided alpha level of 0.10. Correlation between PD-L1 and sTILs was assessed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Multivariate analysis included sTILs (pretreatment and on-treatment) and PD-L1 CPS. Likelihood ratio tests were used to evaluate the added value of factors in predicting pCR rate.

Results: Of 60 total pts, 34 had tumors evaluated for pretreatment sTILs, 52 for PD-L1 CPS, and 33 for both sTILs and CPS. On-treatment sTILs were evaluated in 31 pts. Overall pCR rates were 56.7% and 60% by ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis ypN0, respectively; ORR was 78.3%. In pts evaluated for sTILs and CPS (individually), pCR rates and ORR were comparable with overall pCR rates and ORR. There was a significant correlation between pretreatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS (ρ=0.65, P<0.001).Higher pretreatment sTILs were significantly associated with response: ypT0 ypN0 P= 0.011; ypT0/Tis ypN0 P=0.006; ORR P=0.061. On-treatment sTILs were also significantly associated with response: ypT0 ypN0 P=0.061; ypT0/Tis ypN0 P=0.041; ORR P=0.031. Pretreatment PD-L1 CPS was significantly associated with response: ypT0 ypN0 P=0.073; ypT0/is ypN0 P=0.030; and ORR P=0.021. AUROC of pretreatment sTIL association with pCR was numerically higher than with on-treatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS (0.69 vs 0.61 vs 0.56 for ypT0ypN0 and 0.72 vs 0.67 vs 0.62 for ypT0/Tis ypN0). Responders had higher median pretreatment sTIL levels vs nonresponders: 45% [10, 75] vs 10% [5, 20] for pCR rate by ypT0 ypN0 and 52.5% [10, 73.8] vs 10% [5, 20] for pCR rate by ypT0/Tis ypN0; 25% [5, 70] vs 10% [6.3, 27.5] for ORR. In multivariate analysis, only pretreatment sTILs were significant for both pCR endpoints (ypT0 ypN0 P=0.031; ypT0/Tis ypN0 P=0.034). Likelihood ratio tests demonstrated that for both pCR endpoints, PD-L1 CPS (P=0.683/P=0.422) and on-treatment sTILs (P=0.984/P=0.568) did not add significantly more value to pretreatment sTILs when predicting pCR.

Conclusions:Higher quantities of pretreatment sTILs and PD-L1 CPS and on-treatment sTILs were significantly associated with higher pCR rates and ORR in primary TNBC treated with pembro and NAT.

Citation Format: Loi S, Schmid P, Cortés J, Park YH, Muñoz-Couselo E, Kim S-B, Sohn J, Im S-A, Holgado E, Foukakis T, Kuemmel S, Dent R, Wang A, Aktan G, Karantza V, Salgado R. Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and response to pembrolizumab (Pembro)+chemotherapy (Chemo) as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-09.

Abstract P6-18-06: Ribociclib treatment benefit in patients with advanced breast cancer with ≥1 dose reduction: Data from the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials

Background: In the MONALEESA (ML) trials, addition of ribociclib (RIB; cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) to endocrine therapy (ET) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC). RIB was generally well tolerated, with adverse events (AEs) managed effectively by dose modifications. Here we present efficacy data for RIB-based regimens of interest for the proposed indication (i.e. with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor [NSAI] or fulvestrant [FUL]) from ML-2, -3, and -7 in pts who received no prior ET for ABC and who had ≥1 RIB dose reduction, to explore the efficacy of RIB in pts who need to dose reduce.

Methods: Pts included in this analysis were: postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– ABC and no prior ET for ABC who received RIB (600 mg; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off) with letrozole (2.5 mg/day; ML-2 [NCT01958021]), or FUL (500 mg per label; ML-3 [NCT02422615]); and premenopausal women with no prior ET and ≤1 line of chemotherapy for ABC who received RIB with an NSAI (anastrozole: 1 mg/day; letrozole: 2.5 mg/day; ML-7 [NCT02278120]) plus goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days). Dose reductions for RIB (600 to 400 to 200 mg) were permitted. Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety.

Results: In ML-2, -3, and -7, ≥1 RIB dose reduction occurred (n/N) in 169/334 (51%), 92/238 (39%), and 91/246 (37%) pts assigned to RIB, respectively. AEs were the main reason for dose reduction, with all-grade neutropenia the most common AE leading to dose reduction (ML-2 69%, ML-3 80%, ML-7 82%). Median PFS (months) was prolonged with RIB vs placebo in pts without a RIB dose reduction (ML-2: 27.7 vs 16.0; ML-3: not reached [NR] vs 18.3; ML-7: 23.8 vs 13.8); median PFS in pts with ≥1 RIB dose reduction was: ML-2 25.3, ML-3 NR, and ML-7 27.5 months. In pts with measurable disease and without a RIB dose reduction, ORR was 46% (ML-2), 43% (ML-3), and 48% (ML-7); CBR was 70%, 68%, and 79%, respectively. In pts with measurable disease and ≥1 RIB dose reduction, ORR was 62% (ML-2), 57% (ML-3), and 55% (ML-7); CBR was 88%, 85%, and 88%, respectively. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs in the RIB vs placebo groups (≥5% of pts in either ML trial, irrespective of causality or dose reduction) were neutropenia (ML-2: 62% vs 1%; ML-3: 55% vs 0; ML-7: 65% vs 4%), leukopenia (ML-2: 21% vs 1%; ML-3: 12% vs 0; ML-7: 16% vs 1%), hypertension (ML-2: 13% vs 13%; ML-3: 5% vs 5%; ML-7: 2% vs 3%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ML-2: 10% vs 1%; ML-3: 10% vs 0; ML-7: 5% vs 1%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (ML-2: 6% vs 1%; ML-3: 6% vs 0; ML-7: 4% vs 1%).

Conclusions: Results from the ML-2, -3, and -7 trials suggest that pts who start on 600 mg of RIB and require dose reduction for the management of their AEs, or for other reasons, continue to derive clinical benefit.

Citation Format: Beck JT, Neven P, Sohn J, Chan A, Sonke GS, Bachelot T, Campos-Gomez S, Martin M, Bardia A, Alam J, Miller M, Diaz-Padilla I, Kong O, Hart L. Ribociclib treatment benefit in patients with advanced breast cancer with ≥1 dose reduction: Data from the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-06.

Abstract P2-05-07: Whole exome sequencing of extreme responders reveals low mutation burden in metastatic breast cancer

Background: Extreme responders to anticancer therapy are rarely encountered in the treatment of advanced breast cancer patients, but their treatment response have not been investigated on the whole exome level. We performed whole exome analysis to characterize genomic landscape of extreme responders in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Methods: Clinical samples were obtained from patients who showed exceptional response to anti-HER2 therapy or hormonal therapy. Non-responders were selected among those who did not respond. Matched breast tumor tissue (somatic DNA) and blood samples (germline DNA) were collected from a total of 18 responders (12 ER+, 6 HER2+) and 8 non-responders (6 ER+, 1 HER2+, 1 TNBC). Whole exome sequencing using Illumina HiSeq2500 was performed on the 26 patients (52 samples). Somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs), indels and copy number variants (CNVs) were identified for each patient genome. Group specific somatic variants and mutation burden were statistically analyzed.

Findings: Cancer exomes were characterized by 1,455 somatic single-nucleotide variants (1,327 missense, 80 nonsense, 36 splice-site, 12 start/stop-lost), 149 insertions/deletions (108 frameshift, 41 inframe), with a median of 1 mutations per Mb (0.2 to 2.7 mutations per Mb) in all patients. Responders harbored a significantly lower non-synonymous mutation burden than non-responders (median, 27 vs. 90.5, P=0.01), and copy number variation burden was also lower (median 23 vs. 31, P=0.14). Multivariate analyses of factors influencing progression-free survival showed that high mutation burden and visceral metastases were significantly related with progression.

Interpretation: Extreme responders of metastatic breast cancer are characterized by low nonsynonymous mutational burden.

Citation Format: Sohn J, Lim SM, Kim E, Kim S, Koo JS, Kim SI, Park S, Park HS, Kwon N-J, Kim GM, Kim S. Whole exome sequencing of extreme responders reveals low mutation burden in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-07.

Abstract PD6-12: Withdrawn

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P1-08-03: Withdrawn

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P4-22-13: Everolimus plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in women with HER2+ advanced breast cancer: Overall survival results from BOLERO-1

Background

Everolimus (EVE), an mTOR inhibitor has shown activity in HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) in both preclinical and clinical studies. In the pivotal BOLERO-1 trial (NCT00876395), the progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between the EVE + trastuzumab (TRAS) + paclitaxel (PAC) combination and placebo (PBO) + TRAS + PAC in the full HER2+ population (EVE, 15.0 mo vs PBO, 14.5 mo; HR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.73-1.08; p=0.1166). Although not reaching protocol defined level for statistical significance, the hormone receptor negative (HR-) subpopulation appeared to benefit from EVE, with a 7.2 mo PFS benefit vs PBO arm (EVE, 20.3 mo vs PBO, 13.1 mo; HR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.48-0.91; p=0.0049). The final exploratory overall survival (OS) analysis from the study is presented here.

Methods

In this phase 3 randomized trial, 719 women with HER2+ ABC without prior TRAS or chemotherapy in the metastatic setting were randomized 2:1 to receive either EVE (10 mg/d) or placebo (PBO) and weekly PAC+TRAS, stratified by visceral metastasis (lung, liver, peritoneal or pleural: yes vs no) and prior adjuvant or neo-adjuvant treatment with TRAS (yes vs no). As the primary objectives (PFS on full population and on HR- subpopulation) of BOLERO-1 were not met, the key secondary endpoint of OS was not formally statistically tested. However, given the results of PFS, in particular in the HR- subpopulation, a change to the OS analysis plan was made by introducing one final exploratory OS analysis at the time of study termination.

Results

At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2015), the median duration of exposure was 40.8 weeks (range: 0.6-320.4) in the EVE arm and 48.1 weeks (range: 1.1-308.0) in the PBO arm. After a median follow-up of 60.3 mo, 350 deaths were recorded in the full population, 238 (49.6%) in the EVE arm and 112 (46.9%) pts in the PBO arm. In the full population, the median OS was comparable in the EVE vs PBO arms (48.6 mo vs 50.0 mo respectively; HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.90-1.42). In the HR- subpopulation, 138 deaths were recorded; 88 (42.3%) pts in the EVE arm and 50 (48.5%) pts in the PBO arm. In the HR- subpopulation, the median OS in the EVE arm was longer compared to PBO arm (57.0 mo vs 41.6 mo respectively; HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.59-1.18). Stomatitis, diarrhea, alopecia, cough, rash, pyrexia, neutropenia, and fatigue were the most frequent adverse events (AEs) reported in EVE arm (≥35%). AEs leading to dose interruption and/or change were reported in 441 (93.4%) pts in EVE arm and 165 (69.3%) pts in the PBO arm respectively. Overall, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported in 262 (55.5%) pts in EVE arm and 98 (41.2%) pts in PBO arm. Serious AEs were reported in 171 (36.2%) pts in the EVE arm and 40 (16.8%) pts in the PBO arm respectively. On treatment AE related deaths were reported for 3.6% pts in the EVE arm and 0% pts in the PBO arm.

Conclusions

The median OS was similar in the EVE vs PBO arms for overall population. However, a prolongation of 15.4 mo in median OS of HR- subpopulation was observed in the EVE arm vs PBO arm in this exploratory analysis. Pts in the EVE arm had a manageable safety, consistent with the safety profile of EVE and no new safety signals were identified.

Citation Format: Yardley D, Hurvitz S, Jiang Z-f, Toi M, Burris H, Buyse M, Slamon D, Makhson A, Elsaid A, Lerzo G, Hellerstedt B, Nuzzo F, Sohn J, Manzyuk L, Cabaribere D, Lincy J, Weimann A, Noel-Baron F, Pacaud L, Andre F. Everolimus plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in women with HER2+ advanced breast cancer: Overall survival results from BOLERO-1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-13.

Recycling of spent lithium-ion battery cathode materials by ammoniacal leaching

As the production and consumption of lithium ion batteries (LIBs) increase, the recycling of spent LIBs appears inevitable from an environmental, economic and health viewpoint. The leaching behavior of Ni, Mn, Co, Al and Cu from treated cathode active materials, which are separated from a commercial LIB pack in hybrid electric vehicles, is investigated with ammoniacal leaching agents based on ammonia, ammonium carbonate and ammonium sulfite. Ammonium sulfite as a reductant is necessary to enhance leaching kinetics particularly in the ammoniacal leaching of Ni and Co. Ammonium carbonate can act as a pH buffer so that the pH of leaching solution changes little during leaching. Co and Cu can be fully leached out whereas Mn and Al are hardly leached and Ni shows a moderate leaching efficiency. It is confirmed that the cathode active materials are a composite of LiMn2O4, LiCoxMnyNizO2, Al2O3 and C while the leach residue is composed of LiNixMnyCozO2, LiMn2O4, Al2O3, MnCO3 and Mn oxides. Co recovery via the ammoniacal leaching is believed to gain a competitive edge on convenitonal acid leaching both by reducing the sodium hydroxide expense for increasing the pH of leaching solution and by removing the separation steps of Mn and Al.

Abstract P1-12-09: The oncologic effect of a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for ovarian protection during breast cancer chemotherapy

Background: Recently, chemotherapy with a GnRH agonist was reported to protect against ovarian failure. This study was aimed at determining the oncologic effect of a GnRH agonist concurrent with chemotherapy for breast cancer patients.

Patients and Methods: A total of 1189 patients aged 20 to 40 years with stage I to III breast cancer who received (neo or adjuvant) chemotherapy from five hospitals in Korea from 2002 to 2012 were reviewed. A gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist was given to 410 patients for ovarian protection during chemotherapy (GnRH agonist group), and 779 patients received chemotherapy without ovarian protection (Chemotherapy alone group). A matching strategy was used to create matched sets of two groups by age, stage, hormone receptor status, Her2/neu status, neo or adjuvant chemotherapy, and institute.

Results: Survival analysis using Cox regression showed that the GnRH agonist group had better distant metastatic-free survival (HR=0.65, 95%CI 0.44-0.97) outcomes but similar disease free survival (HR=0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.08) compared with the chemotherapy alone group. The survival benefit was significant for hormone receptor positive, Her2/neu negative breast cancer on distant metastasis (HR=0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.99) and disease free survival (HR0.47 95% CI 0.23-0.93).

Conclusion: Ovarian protection using a GnRH agonist can be safely considered for premenopausal breast cancer patients for whom chemotherapy is planned.

Citation Format: Kim HJ, Lee MH, Lee JE, Park SH, Lee ES, Kang Y-J, Lee JH, Shin HN, Kim SI, Im SA, Ahn SH, Lee KS, Sohn J, Han W, Nam SJ. The oncologic effect of a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for ovarian protection during breast cancer chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-09.