Analysis of patients’ request to switch from a generic drug to the original drug in external prescriptions

Background

Generic drugs are heavily promoted in Japan. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to clarify whether the frequency and reason that patients request a switch from a generic drug to the original drug differ according to therapeutic category and dosage form.

Methods

This study was performed at Chiba University Hospital. Prescription inquiries about 121 generic drugs from community pharmacies over a 3-year period (from July 2014 to June 2017) were analyzed.

Results

Approximately 30% of the requests were related to the efficacy, safety, and comfort of the generic drug. The most cited motive was “patient’s desire with no reason given” at 44.5%. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, therapeutic categories and dosage forms were associated with the requests. The median request frequency differed according to therapeutic category and dosage form. The frequency was highest for “agents affecting the central nervous system” and “tablets and capsules”, respectively. Among the therapeutic categories, “agents affecting the central nervous system” had the highest median number of requests related to “decreased effectiveness”; “cardiovascular agents” had the highest median number of requests related to “physician’s instruction”; and “agents for the epidermis” had the highest median number of requests related to “uncomfortable to use”. Among dosage forms, the odds ratio for patients’ original drug request for “liniment and patch” was about 1.5 times that for “tablets and capsules”. “Liniment and patch” had the highest median frequency of requests related to “decreased effectiveness”, “uncomfortable to use”, and “patient’s desire with no reason given”.

Conclusions

The request frequency and reason differed according to therapeutic category and dosage form. Pharmacists should advise each patient properly about the choice and switching of drug brands, taking into account the therapeutic category and dosage form, especially liniments and patches.

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy duration (3 versus 6 months) for high-risk stage II colon cancer: the randomized phase III ACHIEVE-2 trial

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with debilitating peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer. This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial was conducted as a prospective pooled analysis to investigate the non-inferiority of 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 12 February 2014 to 31 January 2017, 525 Asian patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer were randomly assigned to 3- and 6-month treatment arms. The treatment consisted of either modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (CAPOX). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points were treatment compliance and safety.

RESULTS

Of the 525 randomized patients, 11 were not treated. Among the 514 participating patients (255 in the 3-month arm; 259 in the 6-month arm), 432 (84%) received CAPOX, and 184 (36%) presented with T4 as a high-risk factor for recurrence. The 3-year DFS rate was 88.2% in the 3-month arm and 87.9% in the 6-month arm [hazard ratio (HR), 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67-1.87]. With CAPOX, the 3-year DFS rate was 88.2% in the 3-month arm and 88.4% in the 6-month arm (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.65-1.96). The discontinuation rate in the 3- and 6-month arms was 10% and 31% for mFOLFOX6 (P = 0.0193), and 15% and 35% for CAPOX (P < 0.0001), respectively. The incidence of grade ≥2 PSN was significantly lower in the 3-month arm than in the 6-month arm (16% and 43%, respectively, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of combination therapy presented significantly less grade ≥2 PSN than the respective 6-month regimen. The shortened therapy duration did not affect the 3-year DFS rate, suggesting that a 3-month course of CAPOX can be an effective treatment option.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000013036 and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180128.

AB0350 EFFICACY OF ADDING IGURATIMOD THERAPY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WHO HAD INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO BIOLOGIC DMARDS

Background:

Iguratimod (IGU) was newly approved in Japan in June 2012 and recommended by JCR guideline 2014 in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there have been efficacy of monotherapy and concomitant MTX in clinical trials, however, there have been no reports of concomitant biologic DMARDs (Bio).

Objectives:

we investigated efficacy of concomitant IGU therapy in RA patients who had inadequate response to Bio at the author’s institution.

Methods:

Subjects were 107 patients adding IGU who had inadequate response to Bio from Janually 2014 to October 2018. Previous treatment Bio. was ADA. And baseline mean concomitant MTX was 12.3 mg/week). And baseline characteristics were Mean age 53.8 years, mean duration of illness 5.5 years, corticosteroid use 9.3%(mean 3.1mg/day).

The course of DAS28, SDAI, CDAI and remission rates were analyzed.

Results:

Mean DAS28-ESR, SDAI, CDAI were significantly decreased from the initiation of IGU treatment at 24 weeks (3.1→2.3, 7.1→2.7, 6.5→2.4), at 52 weeks (2.1, 2.4, 2.0). Remission rates of DAS28-ESR, SDAI, CDAI were 69.2%, 68.2%, 70.1% at 24 weeks, 74.8%, 78.5%, 79.4% at 52 weeks. There were no side-effect that must be stopped after adding IGU.

Conclusion:

IGU might be a new RA treatment option for aiming remission in patients who had inadequate response to Bio.

References:

[1]Hara M et al: Safety and efficacy of combination therapy of iguratimod with methotrexate for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: an open-label extension of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2014; 24: 410—418.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

P1016Novel surgical ablation technique using ultrasonic scalpel for atrial fibrillation in mitral valve surgery

Objective

Radiofrequency, cryoablation and cut-and-sew technique have been used for surgical ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. Ultrasonicscalpel is a surgical instrument used to simultaneously cut and cauterize tissue by ultrasound vibration. This device causes minimal lateral thermal tissue damage and increases the tissue penetration depth linearly with time. These features are suitable for surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. This study evaluated surgical ablation with ultrasonic scalpel for atrial fibrillation.

Methods

From October 2017 to February 2019, 46 patients (mean age: 71.8 years [46–86], 28 male) with mitral valve procedure underwent surgical ablation using ultrasonic scalpel for atrial fibrillation. The ablation lines were carried out with Cox maze procedure or pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on cardiopulmonary bypass. Endocardial atrial wall was ablated by direct touch with blade in a few seconds at energy level 5. Pathological study of left atrial wall received ablation with ultrasonic scalpel was carried out.

Results

Type of preoperative atrial fibrillation was persistent in 33 and paroxysmal in 13 patients. Mean left atrial diameter was 49.0 mm (35–81). Surgical ablation using ultrasonic scalpel was carried out to left atrium only or PVI in 33 patients and both atria in 13 patients. Mean surgical ablation time was 4 minutes and 21 seconds. Mitral valve repair and replacement were performed in 33 and replacement in 13 patients, respectively. Simultaneous surgery included 43 tricuspid valve repairs, 11 aortic valve replacements, and 7 coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 142.6 (70–261) and 98.6 (47–202) minutes, respectively. No operative death or perioperative stroke were observed. Thirty-eight patients (82.6%) returned to sinus rhythm immediately after surgery. Sinus rhythm was maintained in 30 patients (65.2%) in the mid-term period with average 142.2 days after surgery (7–426 days). Pathological study showed the atrial walls were not ablated transmurally. No complications including bleeding and tissue injury were observed.

Conclusion

Surgical ablation with ultrasonic scalpel for atrial fibrillation was feasible and provided satisfactory outcomes immediately after surgery and at mid-term. This technique can be performed in a short time without complications. Interestingly, pathological study showed no transmural tissue ablation despite of successful outcomes. This may imply transmural ablation is not necessarily mandatory for surgical ablation. Long-term follow-up are required to evaluate this technique.

A randomized controlled, open-label early phase II trial comparing incidence of FOLFIRI.3-induced diarrhoea between Hangeshashinto and oral alkalization in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

We conducted a pilot clinical trial to investigate whether Hangeshashinto (TJ-14) could be substituted for oral alkalization in patients scheduled to undergo chemotherapy by FOLFIRI.3 regimen for colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Patients with CRC were randomized 1:1 to a TJ-14 (7.5 g/day) group or an oral alkalization (sodium bicarbonate, 1.8 g/day; ursodeoxycholic acid, 300 mg/day) group. The primary endpoint was incident of late-onset diarrhoea. A total of 30 patients were randomized to either the TJ-14 group or the alkalization group.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There was no statistical difference in age, concomitantly used drugs or UGT1A1 genotypes between the groups. In the alkalization group (n = 15), the frequency of grade 0/1/2 and grade 3 diarrhoea was 73% and 27%, respectively. In the TJ-14 group (n = 14), the frequency of grade 0/1/2 and grade 3 diarrhoea was 79% and 21%, respectively. Grade 4 diarrhoea was not observed in either group. There was no statistically significant difference in other adverse events or in response to FOLFIRI.3 between the groups.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This pilot trial suggests that TJ-14 is a promising alternative treatment option to reduce FOLFIRI.3-induced late-onset diarrhoea, although additional clinical study with a larger number of patients is necessary to confirm these results.