OP0024 DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN IL-6 AND IL-17 PATHWAY INHIBITION IN RELATIONSHIP WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN NON-BIOLOGICAL DMARD-IR AND BIOLOGICAL DMARD-IR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH UPADACITINIB IN SELECT-PsA 1 AND SELECT-PsA 2 STUDIES

Background

The differential contribution of IL-6 and IL-17 pathways to the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is not fully understood. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK inhibitor, was more effective than placebo (PBO) in improving key clinical manifestations of PsA in two global phase 3 trials, SELECT-PsA 1 (non-biological DMARD-IR, nbDMARD-IR) and SELECT-PsA 2 (biological DMARD-IR, bDMARD-IR).1,2 Targeted proteomic analysis suggested that UPA modulates multiple biological pathways in innate and adaptive immune systems via direct and indirect inhibition of key regulators, including IL-6 and IL-17 pathways, with a possible shift from Th1 predominance in nbDMARD-IR PsA to a more Th17 bias in bDMARD-IR PsA.3

Objectives

We assessed the relationship between IL-6 and IL-17 pathway modulation and different clinical outcomes after UPA treatment in nbDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR PsA patients.

Methods

A subset of patients was randomly selected from SELECT-PsA 1 (n=74 of UPA 15 mg QD, n=74 of PBO) and PsA 2 studies (n=90 of UPA 15 mg QD, n=81 of PBO). Serum levels of IL-6, IL-17A, IL-17F, and beta-defensin 2 (BD2) proteins were measured at baseline, week 2, and week 12 by validated immunoassays. The quantitative cytokine measurements were transformed as log10, and PASI score was transformed as log10 (x+1) prior to analysis. A Repeated Measure Mixed Linear Model was used to compare UPA versus PBO treatment effects in overall selected patients and between responders and non-responders defined by PASDAS score ≤ 3.6 (Minimal Disease Activity, MDA)4 and PASI75 at week 12, respectively. The relationships between cytokines and clinical outcomes (PASI and DAS28-CRP) were assessed by Pearson’s correlation at baseline and after treatment.

Results

In nbDMARD-IR PsA patients, baseline IL-17A, IL-17F, and BD2 levels correlated with each other and with PASI, while IL-6 appeared independent from the IL-17 pathway and correlated with DAS28-CRP. At week 12, UPA treatment significantly decreased IL-6 and BD2. The decrease of IL-6 was more pronounced in PASDAS MDA responders and correlated with DAS28-CRP improvement, but the decrease of BD2 was significant in PASI75 responders and correlated with PASI improvement. In contrast, IL-17A and IL-17F were not significantly changed after UPA treatment, neither correlated with clinical outcomes at week 12.

In bDMARD-IR PsA patients, baseline IL-17A level was significantly elevated compared to nbDMARD-IR patients but weakly correlated with other cytokines and show no correlation with PASI. At week 12, the reduction of IL-6 after UPA treatment was not different between responders and non-responders (PASDAS MDA or PASI75) and did not correlate with DAS28-CRP improvement, while the reduction of BD2 remained significant in PASI75 responders and correlated with PASI improvement. Further, UPA treatment significantly reduced IL-17A in PASDAS MDA responders and IL-17F in PASI75 responders compared to non-responders, respectively. The reduction of IL-17F correlated with PASI improvement at week 12.

Conclusion

IL-6 and IL-17 pathway inhibition after UPA treatment showed different profiles in relationship with clinical outcomes in nbDMARD-IR versus bDMARD-IR PsA patients. IL-6 decrease was more pronounced in nbDMARD-IR PsA patients and associated with joint manifestation improvement, while IL-17A and IL-17F decreases were only observed in bDMARD-IR PsA patients and associated with psoriasis improvement. BD2, a biomarker of Th17-associated skin pathology, significantly decreased after UPA treatment in both nbDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR PsA studies, which likely contributed to UPA effects on psoriasis improvement in a broad range of PsA patients.

References

[1]McInnes IB, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1227-39.

[2]Mease PJ, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;80:312-20.

[3]Sornasse T, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:433.

[4]Salaffi F, et al. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:528105.

Acknowledgements

AbbVie, Inc., in collaboration with the authors, contributed to the study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of the results, and preparation, review and approval of the final version. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship.

Disclosure of Interests

Fang Cai Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Thierry Sornasse Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Melanie Ruzek Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Yuni Fang Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Koji Kato Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Peter Wung Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, Amgen, Causeway, Oxford Biodynamics, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Boehringer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, Amgen, Causeway, Oxford Biodynamics, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Boehringer, and UCB.

Early onset of heart failure in Japanese ARVC patients with pathogenic desmosomal gene variants

Background

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy mainly caused by desmosomal gene variants. Although there are a lot of reports regarding to European ARVC patients, the ones in Asian are a few, and the characteristics of Asian ARVC have been still unclear. We have reported that the genetic backgrounds in Japanese ARVC patients were different from those in European ones. In this study, we aimed to examine the phenotype and outcome of Japanese ARVC patients with specific genetic backgrounds.

Methods and results

This study included 104 Japanese ARVC patients who were diagnosed as definite in the 2010 Task Force Criteria for ARVC and received genetic analysis (79 males [76%]; median age at diagnosis, 40 years [IQR 22–53 years].) Fifty-seven patients carried variants in desmosomal genes classified as pathogenic based on ACMG guideline: 30 in DSG2 (29%), 22 in PKP2 (21%), 2 in DSC2 (2%) and 3 in DSP (3%). The median age of diagnosis was significantly younger in the patients with the pathogenic variants than in those without (37 years [IQR 21–49 years] vs. 46 years [IQR 34–58 years], P=0.01). During a median follow-up of 9.3 years (IQR 3.5–20.9 years), 10 patients died and 2 were received heart transplantation. Sixty-two suffered lethal arrhythmic events including cardiopulmonary arrest, ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia and appropriate shocks by implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Twenty-two were hospitalized for heart failure. There was no difference in these events rate between the two groups. However, survival analysis revealed that patients with pathogenic variants hospitalized for heart failure significantly earlier in their life than those without (P=0.04, log-rank test, Figure 1).

Conclusions

The Japanese ARVC patients with pathogenic variants in desmosomal genes are diagnosed and hospitalize for heart failure at younger age than those without. These findings have not been reported in other ethnics. Our study warns that we should be cautious for not only the prevention of lethal arrhythmic events but also the progress of the heart failure in Japanese ARVC patients with pathogenic variants.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Figure 1

O-223 Fatty acid supplementation into warming solutions improve the developmental competence of mouse, bovine, and human oocytes and embryos after vitrification

Study question

Does fatty acid (FA) supplementation into vitrification and warming solutions influence the developmental competence of oocyte and embryo after vitrification and warming?

Summary answer

FA supplementation during the warming process improves the developmental competence of vitrified-warmed mouse oocytes and embryonic-morphologies after vitrification at the cleavage-stage in bovines and humans.

What is known already

Vitrified metaphase II stage oocytes exhibit a diminished ability to develop into blastocysts and live births. Previous studies have shown reduction in intracellular lipid content as one of the factors associated with reduced developmental competence of oocytes after vitrification as the intracellular lipid content of oocytes is affected by vitrification. FAs derived from break down of lipids are primarily transferred to the mitochondria, where it plays a crucial role in cellular metabolism. However, the effects of FA supplementation in warming solutions on the cytoplasmic lipid content and subsequent embryo development are unknown.

Study design, size, duration

A chemically defined FA mixture was added to the vitrification and/or warming solutions. Oocytes collected from C57BL6/N (n = 80) were randomly divided into three groups (fresh, n = 634; non-FA (control), n = 961; FA, n = 1,686), and were vitrified-warmed with/without FA. Lipid composition, developmental competence, and gene expression levels were compared among the groups. Bovine embryos (fresh, n = 420; control, n = 524; FA, n = 492) and discarded human day-2 embryos (control, n = 87; FA, n = 92) were used to examine the developmental competence of embryos.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Lipids in the ooplasm were stained with Nile red and the fluorescence intensity was analysed. The developmental competence of mouse oocytes was examined by performing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Expressions of FA metabolism-related genes were measured. The bovine embryos were vitrified at the four-cell stage and cultured to the blastocyst stage after warming. Cryopreserved discarded human embryos were warmed and cultured. The obtained blastocysts were then placed on fibronectin-coated dishes to examine the outgrowth formation.

Main results and the role of chance

Lipid content of mouse oocytes was significantly lower in the control group compared to that in the fresh group (P < 0.05). On the contrary, lipid contents of FA and fresh groups were comparable (P = 0.24). Blastocyst formation rate was significantly higher in the FA group than that in the control group (55.7% and 44.8%, respectively; P < 0.05). To examine the optimal timing for FA supplementation, FA was added to the vitrification solution (FAvit), warming solution (FAthaw), and/or both solutions (FAvit-thaw). Blastocyst formation rate was significantly higher in the FAthaw group than that in the control group (59.8% and 50.0%, respectively; P < 0.05). The mRNA expressions of Acaa2 and Hadha in mouse embryos were significantly higher in the FAthaw group compared to that in the control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, FA supplemented warming solutions significantly improved the blastocyst formation rate in bovines (control, 53.5%; FAthaw, 64.5%; P < 0.05). Developmental rate to the expanded blastocyst stage was slightly improved in human embryos (control, 53.7%; FAthaw, 63%; P = 0.38) and the proportion of Grade A in inner cell mass and trophectoderm was significantly higher in the FAthaw group than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no differences in the outgrowth abilities between the control and FAthaw groups.

Limitations, reasons for caution

Since the experiments of the current study on human embryos were performed in vitro using discarded embryos, in vivo developmental ability was not evaluated. Therefore, to validate the application of our findings in human assisted reproductive technologies, further clinical trials (ART) are warranted.

Wider implications of the findings

FA supplementation into the warming solutions improved the developmental competence of vitrified–warmed oocytes and cleaved embryos by activating the β-oxidation pathway. These results indicate that FA supplementation into warming solutions is a potential strategy to improve clinical outcomes in human ART.

Trial registration number

not applicable

O-220 An annotation-free embryo scoring system (iDAScore®) based on deep learning shows high performance for pregnancy prediction after single-vitrified blastocyst transfer

Study question

How is the performance of an automated embryo scoring system for pregnancy prediction after single-vitrified blastocyst transfer (SVBT) compared to other, annotation-dependent blastocyst grading systems?

Summary answer

Automatic embryo ranking by iDAScore shows a higher or equal performance, with regards to pregnancy prediction after SVBT, compared to manual, annotation-dependent grading systems.

What is known already

Blastocyst viability can be assessed by blastocyst morphology grades and/or morphokinetic parameters. However, morphological and morphokinetic embryo assessment is prone to both inter- and intra-observer variation. Recently, embryo ranking models have been developed based on artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning. Such models rank embryos according to their potential for pregnancy only based on images and do not require any user-dependent annotation. So far, no study has independently assessed the performance of AI models compared to other embryo scoring models, including traditional morphological grading.

Study design, size, duration

A total of 3,014 SVBT cycles were retrospectively analysed. Embryos were stratified according to SART age groups. The quality and scoring of embryos were assessed by iDAScore v1.0 (iDAS, Vitrolife, Sweden), KIDScoreTM D5 v3 (KS; Vitrolife), and Gardner criteria. The performance of the pregnancy prediction for each embryo scoring model was compared using the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve for each maternal age group.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Embryos were cultured in the EmbryoScope+ and EmbryoScopeFlex (Vitrolife). iDAS was automatically calculated using the iDAScore model running on the EmbryoViewer (Vitrolife). KS was calculated in EmbryoViewer after annotation of the required parameters. ICM and TE were annotated according to the Gardner criteria. The degree of expansion in all blastocysts was Grade 4 due to our freezing policy. Furthermore, Gardner’s scores were stratified into four grades (Excellent: AA, Good: AB BA, Fair: BB, Poor: others).

Main results and the role of chance

The AUCs of the < 35 years age group (n = 389) for pregnancy prediction were 0.72 for iDAS, 0.66 for KS and 0.64 for Gardner criteria. The AUC of iDAS was significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to the other two models. For the 35–37 years age group (n = 514) the AUCs were 0.68, 0.68, and 0.65 for iDAS, KS and Gardner, respectively, and were not significantly different. The AUCs of the 38–40 years age group (n = 796) were 0.67 for iDAS, 0.65 for KS and 0.64 for Gardner criteria and where was not significantly different. The AUCs of the 41–42 years age group (n = 636) were 0.66, 0.66, and 0.63 for iDAS, KS and Gardner, respectively, and there was no significant difference among the pregnancy prediction models. For the > 42 years age group (n = 389) AUCs were 0.76 for iDAS, 0.75 for KS and 0.75 for Gardner criteria and not significantly different. Thus, for all age groups, iDAS was either highest or equal to the highest AUC, although a significant difference was only observed for the youngest age group.

Limitations, reasons for caution

In this study, SVBT was performed after minimal stimulation and natural cycle in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Therefore, we had only few cycles with elective blastocyst transfer. However, there was also no bias in selecting the embryos for SVBT.

Wider implications of the findings

Our results showed that objective embryo assessment by a completely automatic and annotation-free model, iDAScore, does perform as good or even better than more traditional embryo assessment or an annotation-dependent ranking tool. iDAS could be an optimal pregnancy prediction model after SVBT, especially in young and advanced age patients.

Trial registration number

not applicable

NF-kB decoy oligodeoxynucleotide preserves disc height in a rabbit anular-puncture model and reduces pain induction in a rat xenograft-radiculopathy model

While it is known that the degenerated intervertebral disc (IVD) is one of the primary reasons for low-back pain and subsequent need for medical care, there are currently no established effective methods for direct treatment. Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is a transcription factor that regulates various genes' expression, among which are inflammatory cytokines, in many tissues including the IVD. NF-κB decoy is an oligodeoxynucleotide containing the NF-κB binding site that entraps NF-κB subunits, resulting in suppression of NF-κB activity. In the present preclinical study, NF-κB decoy was injected into degenerated IVDs using the rabbit anular-puncture model. In terms of distribution, NF-κB decoy persisted in the IVDs up to at least 4 weeks after injection. The remaining amount of NF-κB decoy indicated that it fit a double-exponential-decay equation. Investigation of puncture-caused degeneration of IVDs showed that NF-κB decoy injection recovered, dose-dependently, the reduced disc height that was associated with reparative cell cloning and morphological changes, as assessed through histology. Gene expression, by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), showed that NF-κB decoy attenuated inflammatory gene expression, such as that of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α, in rabbit degenerated IVDs. NF-κB decoy also reduced the pain response as seen using the "pain sensor" nude rat xenograft-radiculopathy model. This is the first report demonstrating that NF-κB decoy suppresses the inflammatory response in degenerated IVDs and restores IVD disc height loss. Therefore, the intradiscal injection of NF-κB decoy may have the potential as an effective therapeutic strategy for discogenic pain associated with degenerated IVDs.

Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer

Background

Nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) are standard treatments for refractory advanced gastric cancer (AGC); however, it is unclear which drug should be administered first or in which cases. The tumor growth rate (TGR) during preceding treatment is reported to be associated with tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, suggesting that TGR may be useful for drug selection. Therefore, we evaluated the association between TGR during preceding treatment and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive AGC patients treated with NIVO or IRI and divided them into slow-growing (Slow) and rapid-growing (Rapid) groups according to TGR and the presence or absence of new lesions (NL+/NL−, respectively) during preceding treatment (Slow group: NL− with low TGR <0.30%/day; Rapid group: NL+ or high TGR ≥0.30%/day).

Results

A total of 117 patients (Rapid/Slow groups, 72/45; NIVO/IRI groups, 32/85) were eligible. All baseline characteristics except peritoneal metastases were similar between patients treated with NIVO and IRI in the Rapid and Slow groups. The response rate was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI [31%/3%; odds ratio (OR), 13.8; P = 0.01; adjusted OR, 52; P = 0.002] in the Slow group, but there was no difference between patients treated with NIVO and IRI (5%/8%; OR, 0.68; P = 0.73; adjusted OR, 0.94; P = 0.96) in the Rapid group. Disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were consistent with these results.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that NIVO treatment is a more favorable option for patients with slow-growing tumors, and NIVO and IRI are similarly recommended for patients with rapid-growing tumors in refractory AGC. TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be helpful for drug selection and warrant further investigation.

•

NIVO and IRI are standard treatments for refractory AGC, although it is unclear which should be administered first.

•

TGR may be useful for drug selection, therefore we evaluated the association between TGR and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI.

•

In the Slow group, the response rate (RR) was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI.

•

In the Rapid group, there was no significant difference in RR between the NIVO and IRI groups.

•

TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be useful for drug selection.

AB0357 LANDSCAPE REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS

Background:

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic large vessel vasculitis that results in symptoms (e.g., headaches, jaw claudication, fatigue, pain, etc.) that can have multiple negative impacts on an individual’s health-related quality of life.

Objectives:

To identify important symptoms and impacts experienced by individuals with GCA, develop a conceptual model, and evaluate available patient reported outcome (PRO) measures for appropriateness for inclusion in GCA clinical studies.

Methods:

Published literature on disease experience from databases, conference abstracts, and Guidance/OMERACT documents were reviewed. A GCA conceptual model was developed based on the symptoms and impacts identified from this literature and supplemented with clinical input. A detailed review of selected PROs was then conducted to assess concept coverage and gaps to evaluate appropriateness for a GCA population.

Results:

Of 245 identified citations, 24 abstracts and 18 articles were reviewed. Key symptoms affecting GCA patients (e.g., ischemic and constitutional symptoms) and impacts to the lives of GCA patients (e.g., reduced physical, social and emotional functioning) formed the basis for a GCA conceptual model (see Figure 1).

No GCA-specific PROs were identified. Therefore, the PROs that were used most frequently in GCA clinical studies were reviewed and evaluated. These included the SF-36, FACIT-Fatigue, Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), EQ-5D, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), and Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25). These PROs included some key impacts but did not assess most GCA-specific symptoms (e.g., headaches, fever, etc.). No measures were developed with input from GCA patients and there has been limited evaluation of the measurement properties of these PROs in GCA patients.

The FACIT-Fatigue, SF-36, and the PtGA, which were frequently administered in published GCA studies, measure key GCA concepts such as fatigue, functioning, impact on daily activities and disease status. The measurement properties (reliability, validity, sensitivity to change) have been documented in several other rheumatologic diseases (Table 1).

Conclusion:

In the absence of a GCA-specific PRO, the SF-36, FACIT- Fatigue, and PtGA are recommended for use in GCA clinical studies for the assessment of key concepts identified in the literature. Qualitative and quantitative research should be conducted with GCA patients to assess the content validity and measurement properties of these PROs in a GCA population.

Table 1.

Summary of Recommended Measures

DescriptionSF-36FACIT-FatiguePtGATypeGeneric, health status measureFatigue and impact on function/daily activitiesMeasure of disease activityMethod of AdministrationSelf/InterviewerSelf/InterviewerSelf# of Items36131Recall periodPast 4 weeks/past weekPast 7 daysVariesScoring8 domain scores; 2 component summary scoresTotal scoreTotal scoreMeasurement propertiesMeasurement properties demonstrated in other rheumatologic diseases (SLE, RA, SpA, and chronic knee pain); construct validity demonstrated in a single study with GCA patientsMeasurement properties demonstrated in rheumatologic populations including SLE, PsA, and RASelect measurement properties have been demonstrated in GCA and other populations (RA, TAK, RP)Concept coverageGCA impacts (emotional, physical, and social functioning, and daily activities), bodily pain, fatigueFatigueOverall assessment of disease activityAdministered in recent GCA studiesYESYESYES

SLE= systemic lupus erythematosus, SpA = spondyloarthritis, PsA=psoriatic arthritis, RA=rheumatoid arthritis, GCA= giant cell arteritis, TAK=Takayasu’s arteritis, RP=relapsing polychondritis

Disclosure of Interests:

Hilary H Colwell Consultant of: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Susan Mathias Consultant of: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Kelly Kato Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Catherine E Najem Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Amy M Archer Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson

POS1030 EFFICACY OF UPADACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE SKIN SEVERITY: A SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF TWO PHASE III TRIALS

Background:

In the SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 clinical trials, upadacitinib (UPA) demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1,2 PsA is associated with varying degrees of psoriatic symptoms; however, the impact of skin severity on treatment outcomes is not well understood.

Objectives:

This post-hoc analysis assessed the effects of baseline skin severity on UPA efficacy.

Methods:

SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2 enrolled pts with PsA and prior inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to ≥1 non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)1 or ≥1 biologic DMARD2, respectively. In both trials, pts received once daily UPA 15 mg or UPA 30 mg or placebo (switched at Wk 24 to either UPA 15 mg or 30 mg); SELECT-PsA 1 also included the active comparator adalimumab (ADA). Only continuous UPA 15 mg and ADA are presented here. In this analysis, pts were divided into subgroups based on the extent of psoriasis at baseline (body surface area [BSA] of ≥3%-<10% or BSA ≥10%); efficacy endpoints were analyzed at Wk 56. Results for binary endpoints are based on non-responder imputation; continuous endpoints are based on mixed model repeated measures analysis with as-observed data.

Results:

In the UPA 15 mg and ADA groups, respectively, 32% (138/429) and 31% (132/429) of pts had a BSA ≥3-<10% at baseline in SELECT-PsA 1; 18% (76/429) in each treatment group had a BSA ≥10%. In SELECT-PsA 2, 38% (80/211) had a BSA ≥3-<10% and 24% (50/211) had a BSA ≥10% at baseline in the UPA 15 mg group. Across pt populations (non-biologic DMARD-IR and biologic DMARD-IR), generally consistent results were observed between patients in both skin severity subgroups (Figure 1). In non-biologic DMARD-IR pts, a numerically greater proportion of UPA 15 mg pts with lower skin involvement compared with higher skin involvement achieved PASI100 and PASI≤1, two more stringent skin endpoints. The achievement of MDA was generally consistent across skin severity subgroups; when pts were required to achieve the skin component of MDA, results were numerically better in the ≥3-<10% skin severity group (Table 1). In non-biologic DMARD-IR pts, results were similar between UPA 15 mg and ADA.

Conclusion:

UPA is a viable treatment option for pts with active PsA regardless of the extent of psoriasis at baseline. Although these results are of interest and hypothesis-generating, they should be interpreted with caution due to low sample size.

References:

[1]McInnes IB et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020; 79:12

[2]Mease PJ et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020; doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218870

Table 1.

Additional Efficacy Outcomes at Week 56 Stratified by Severity of Skin Involvement at Baseline

SELECT-PsA 1n/N (%) [95% CI]UPA 15 mgADAsIGA 0/1 w/at least 2 point improvement from BLa ≥3%-<10%71/128 (55.5) [46.9, 64.1]53/124 (42.7) [34.0, 51.4] ≥10%29/76 (38.2) [27.2, 49.1]33/77 (42.9) [31.8, 53.9]MDA + skinb ≥3%-<10%58/138 (42.0) [33.8, 50.3]56/132 (42.4) [34.0, 50.9] ≥10%19/76 (25.0) [15.3, 34.7]28/79 (35.4) [24.9, 46.0]SELECT-PsA 2n/N (%) [95% CI]UPA 15 mgsIGA 0/1 w/at least 2 point improvement from BLa ≥3%-<10%24/71 (33.8) [22.8, 44.8] ≥10%18/50 (36.0) [22.7, 49.3] MDA + skinb ≥3%-<10%22/80 (27.5) [17.7, 37.3] ≥10%9/50 (18.0) [7.4, 28.6]

a defined as achieving an sIGA score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2 point improvement from BL, evaluated in pts with BL sIGA ≥2.

b defined as achieving 5 of the 7 criteria, with PASI ≤1 or BSA-psoriasis ≤3 as a required component.

ADA, adalimumab; BL, baseline; CI, confidence interval; MDA, minimal disease activity; sIGA, Static Investigator Global Assessment of psoriasis; UPA, upadacitinib

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie and the authors thank the patients, study sites, and investigators who participated in this clinical trial. AbbVie, Inc was the study sponsor, contributed to study design, data collection, analysis & interpretation, and to writing, reviewing, and approval of final version. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Ramona Vladea, PhD and Jamie Urbanik, PharmD both of AbbVie Inc.

Disclosure of Interests:

Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Celgene, Sanofi, Regeneron, Arena, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, EMD Sorono, Avotres and Leo Pharma, Pascal Richette Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Janssen, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, and Celgene, Ennio Lubrano Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, Edit Drescher: None declared, Lilian Soto: None declared, Charles Lovan Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Koji Kato Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Ralph Lippe Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Michael Lane Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Mitsumasa Kishimoto Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen-Astellas BioPharma, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Ayumi Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, and UCB Pharma.

OP0030 TREATMENT OF NON-BIOLOGIC-DMARD-IR PSA PATIENTS WITH UPADACITINIB OR ADALIMUMAB RESULTS IN THE MODULATION OF DISTINCT FUNCTIONAL PATHWAYS: PROTEOMICS ANALYSIS OF THE SELECT-PSA 1 PHASE 3 STUDY

Background:

Treatment of non-biologic-DMARD-IR (DMARD-IR) PsA patients with upadacitinib (UPA) at 15 mg QD, an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, resulted in improvement in musculoskeletal symptoms, psoriasis, physical function, fatigue, quality of life, and inhibited radiographic progression; improvements were observed as early as Week 2 (ACR20 and ACR50). UPA 15 mg QD was non-inferior to adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg EOW for ACR201

Objectives:

To determine the relative biological pathway modulation of UPA compared with ADA in patients with PsA via the evaluation of a pre-defined set of plasma proteins associated with inflammation.

Methods:

Patients from the SELECT-PsA1 study (DMARD-IR PsA patients) were randomly selected (PBO, n=100; UPA 15 mg QD, n=100; ADA 40 mg EOW, n = 100). The levels of 92 inflammation related protein biomarkers (pBM) were analyzed using a multiplexed Proximity Extension Assay platform in plasma samples collected at baseline, week 2, and 12; change from baseline in protein levels were expressed as Log2 Fold Change; a Repeated Measure Mixed Linear Model identified proteins modulated by UPA and ADA compared to Baseline. Functional pathway prediction was performed in silico with a commercially distributed software where 52 significantly modulated pBM (mean |Log2 FC| ≥ 0.1 AND FDR ≤ 0.05) were selected; results were summarized based on 3 core biological groups: 1) adaptive immune system, 2) innate immune system, and 3) non-immune connective and vascular systems.

Results:

At the single pBM-level, at the week 2 and 12 time points, treatment with UPA 15 mg QD resulted in distinct down modulation of T cell-associated (CD5, CD8a, IL15Ra, SLAMF1, TRANCE) and myeloid cell-associated pBM (CSF-1, CCL7, CCL13) that was not observed in the ADA treated group. Reciprocally, treatment with ADA 40 mg EOW resulted in a specific down modulation of a subset of neutrophil associated pBM (CCL3, CCL4, and S100A12). Both treatments resulted in the down modulation of IFN-, IL6-, and TNF-related pBM (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, IL6, TNFRSF19, and TNSF14) suggesting a common node of activity related to these pivotal cytokine-signaling pathways.

Functional pathway prediction based on the pBM data revealed that treatment with UPA is preferentially associated with the inhibition of T cells, but also NK cells and lymphocytes, compared to the predicted effects of treatment with ADA. Treatment with UPA also preferentially inhibited pathways related to bone damage and angiogenesis, as compared to the predicted effect of treatment with ADA. Finally, both treatments were predicted to inhibit multiple pathways associated with the activity of myeloid cells and phagocytes.

Conclusion:

Consistent with previous observations in RA2, UPA is predicted to inhibit multiple functional pathways associated the pathobiology of PsA belonging to the general categories of adaptive and innate immunity but also non-immune vascular and connective tissue biology. In contrast, treatment with ADA appears to affect more specifically functional pathways associated with the innate immune system.

References:

[1]McInnes, I. et al. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, 16-17 (2020).

[2]Sornasse, T., Song, I.H., Radstake, T. & McInnes, I. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, 581-582 (2020).

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, reviewing, and approval of the publication. All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship.

Disclosure of Interests:

Thierry Sornasse Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Jaclyn Anderson Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Koji Kato Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Apinya Lertratanakul Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, UCB, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, UCB Pharma

POS1047 IMPACT OF UPADACITINIB ON REDUCING PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: RESULTS FROM TWO PHASE 3 TRIALS IN PATIENTS WITH INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO NON-BIOLOGIC OR BIOLOGIC DMARDs

Background:

Pain is a dominant symptom of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and pain reduction is a priority for patients (pts) that is often assessed in clinical trials. Upadacitinib (UPA), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor engineered for increased selectivity for JAK1 over JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase2, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in pts with active PsA in the SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 studies.1,2

Objectives:

The objective of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of UPA vs placebo (PBO) and adalimumab (ADA) on pain using different assessments through 24 weeks (wks).

Methods:

The SELECT-PsA program enrolled adult pts with active PsA with prior inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to ≥1 non-biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 1; NCT03104400) or prior IR or intolerance to ≥1 biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 2; NCT03104374). Concomitant background therapy with ≤2 non-biologic DMARDs was allowed but not required. Pts were randomized to UPA 15 mg or UPA 30 mg once daily (QD) or PBO (both studies), or ADA 40 mg every other week (EOW; SELECT-PsA 1 only). Pain was assessed as proportion of pts achieving ≥30%, ≥50%, or ≥70% reduction from baseline (BL) in Pt’s global assessment (PGA) of pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score (0–10), proportion of pts achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain (defined as ≥1 point reduction or 15% reduction from BL on a 0–10 NRS)3,4 and change from baseline in pain NRS (0–10) at all time points. In addition, change from BL in BASDAI questions 2 (spinal pain) and 3 (joint pain/swelling) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questions 7 (bodily pain) and 8 (pain interference) at weeks 12 and 24 were assessed. Non-responder imputation was used for binary endpoints and mixed-effects model for repeated measurements for continuous endpoints. The statistical significance defined as P<0.05 was exploratory in nature.

Results:

In both studies, a significantly higher proportion of pts receiving UPA 15 mg QD and UPA 30 mg QD vs PBO achieved improvements in most pain endpoints as early as wk 2, and improvements were generally either sustained or increased through wk 24 (nominal P<0.05). A significant improvement with UPA vs PBO was also observed for change from BL in PGA of pain NRS scores over time, as well as in BASDAI spinal pain and joint pain/swelling and SF-36 bodily pain and pain interference at weeks 12 and 24. In SELECT-PsA 1 significantly higher proportions of pts receiving UPA 30 mg QD vs ADA 40 mg EOW achieved improvements in most pain assessments as early as wk 2 which were sustained through wk 24; improvements in several assessments were also significantly greater with UPA 15 mg QD vs ADA 40 mg EOW at wk 24 (nominal P <0.05; Data will be presented).

Conclusion:

In pts with active PsA who had inadequate response to non-biologic or biologic DMARDs, a greater proportion of pts treated with UPA vs PBO achieved rapid, significant, and clinically meaningful reductions in pain across multiple pain assessments. The reductions in pain were sustained over 24 wks.

References:

[1]McInnes I. et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(Suppl 1):12-13.

[2]Genovese M.C. et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(Suppl 1):139.

[3]Dworkin, R.H. et al. J Pain. 2008;9(2):105-121.

[4]Salaffi F. et al. Eur J Pain. 2004;8:283–291.

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, reviewing, and approval of the publication. All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by M Hovenden and J Matsuura of ICON plc (North Wales, PA) and was funded by AbbVie.

Disclosure of Interests:

Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, William Tillett Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Kurt de Vlam Speakers bureau: Celgene Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, and UCB, Consultant of: Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene and Galapagos, Louis Bessette Speakers bureau: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, and Sanofi, Consultant of: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, Gilead, Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, and Gilead, Ralph Lippe Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, anna maniccia Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Patrick Zueger Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Dai Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Koji Kato Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Andrew Ostor Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Gilead, and Paradigm.

POS0407 PROTEOMICS ANALYSIS COMPARING THE MODE OF ACTION OF UPADACITINIB BETWEEN NON-BIOLOGIC-DMARD-IR AND BIOLOGIC-DMARD-IR PsA PATIENTS IDENTIFIES DISTINCT PATHOGENIC PATHWAYS IN THE SELECT-PsA 1 AND SELECT-PsA 2 PHASE 3 STUDIES

Background:

Treatment of non-biologic-DMARD-IR1 (DMARD-IR) and biologic-DMARD-IR2 (bio-IR) PsA patients with upadacitinib (UPA) at 15 mg QD, an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, resulted in significant improvement in signs and symptoms compared to placebo.

Objectives:

Using a pre-defined set of inflammation-related plasma protein biomarkers (pBM), to explore immunological pathway modulation by UPA 15 mg QD in PsA patients with active disease despite treatment with non-biologic or biologic DMARDs in the context of clinical response vs. non-response to treatment.

Methods:

Patients from the SELECT-PsA 1 (DMARD-IR) and the SELECT-PsA 2 (bio-IR) studies were randomly selected (PBO, n=100; UPA 15 mg QD, n=100 for each study). The levels of 92 inflammation related protein biomarkers (pBM) were analyzed using a multiplexed Proximity Extension Assay platform in plasma samples collected at baseline, week 2, and 12; change from baseline in protein levels was expressed as Log2 Fold Change; a Repeated Measure Mixed Linear Model was used to identify pBM modulated by UPA compared to Baseline, and those differentially modulated between responders (R) and non-responders (NR) according to ACR50, PASDAS Minimal Disease Activity, and PASI75 at week 12. Correlation of disease activity measures with relative levels of pBM were derived using Pearson’s correlation; PASI score was transformed as Log10 (x+1) prior to the analysis. Functional pathway prediction was performed in silico with a commercial distributed software.

Results:

At baseline, the relative levels of 37 pBM correlated with at least one baseline disease activity measure, with a marked positive correlation of IL6 with musculoskeletal end points (PASDAS and DAS28CRP), and a strong positive correlation of IL20, IL17A, IL17C, and TGFA with baseline PASI.

At the single pBM-level, treatment with UPA 15 mg QD resulted in a down modulation of pBM associated with T cells, myeloid cells, and IFN-, IL6-, and TNF-related pathways in both DMARD-IR and bio-IR PsA patients. Overall effects of UPA on single pBMs were broadly similar between DMARD-IR and bio-IR patients. However, analysis of pBMs differentially modulated by UPA in R vs NR indicated that favorable clinical response (achievement of ACR50, PASDAS MDA, and PASI75) in DMARD-IR patients was associated with the down modulation of pBMs predicted to be linked to IFN, IL10, IL17, IL22, and IL27 pathways; while favorable clinical response in bio-IR patients was associated with the down modulation of multiple pBM predicted to be linked to the IL17, IL23, and IL1 pathways.

Conclusion:

UPA effects in both DMARD-IR and bio-IR PsA patients likely stem from the direct and indirect inhibition of multiple biological pathways belonging to the adaptive and innate immune systems. Responder/Non-Responder analysis suggests a possible shift from a TH1 biased biology in DMARD-IR PsA patients to a more TH17 biased biology in bio-IR PsA patients. This apparent change in the disease biology of PsA patients after inadequate response to prior therapy could be attributed to the actual alteration of the disease biology, treatment outcome-based patient selection, or both. Considering the clinical efficacy of UPA in both DMARD-IR and bio-IR PsA patients, this observation highlights the importance of targeting multiple pathways with drugs such as UPA for the treatment of a broad range of PsA patients.

References:

[1]McInnes, I. et al. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, 16-17 (2020).

[2]Mease, P.J. et al.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, annrheumdis-2020-218870 (2020).

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, reviewing, and approval of the publication. All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship.

Disclosure of Interests:

Thierry Sornasse Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Jaclyn Anderson Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Koji Kato Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Apinya Lertratanakul Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, UCB Pharma, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, UCB

AB0523 LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF UPADACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: RESULTS AT 56 WEEKS FROM THE SELECT-PsA 1 STUDY

Background:

In the SELECT-PsA 1 study, through 24 weeks (wks), once daily upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) and 30 mg (UPA30) showed improvements in musculoskeletal symptoms, psoriasis, physical function, pain, fatigue, and quality of life, as well as inhibition of radiographic progression in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).1

Objectives:

To report the efficacy and safety of UPA vs adalimumab (ADA) up to 56 wks from the ongoing long-term extension of SELECT-PsA 1.

Methods:

Pts received UPA15 or UPA30, ADA 40mg every other wk for 56 wks, or PBO through wk 24 switched thereafter to either UPA15 or UPA30 until wk 56. Efficacy endpoints as listed and defined in the Table 1 were analyzed at wk 56. Results for binary endpoints are based on non-responder imputation analysis; treatments were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results for non-radiographic continuous endpoints are based on mixed model repeated measures model based on as observed data. Radiographic endpoints were analyzed based on linear extrapolation. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per 100 pt years (PY) were summarized for pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug.

Table 1.

Efficacy Endpoints at Week 56

EndpointPBO → UPA15PBO → UPA30UPA15UPA30ADAACR20, %73.074.174.474.7#68.5ACR50, %54.560.459.7*60.5#51.3ACR70, %29.935.840.6*43.7#31.2Minimal Disease Activity, %29.435.844.847.3#39.6PASI75a, %58.360.265.463.361.1PASI90a, %41.753.749.149.546.9PASI100a, %22.338.934.639.531.3Resolution of enthesitis by Leeds Enthesitis Index b, %38.145.559.358.154.0Resolution of dactylitis by Leeds Dactylitis Index c, %47.759.075.074.874.0Δ from BL in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index d-3.1-3.1-3.3-3.2-2.8Δ from BL in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde Score (mTSS)0.44e-0.05†0.02‡-0.06

* and †, p≤0.05; for UPA15 vs ADA and PBO, respectively; # and ‡, p≤0.05; for UPA30 vs ADA and PBO, respectively.

a for pts with psoriasis affecting ≥3% of body surface area at BL. b for pts with LEI >0 at BL. c for pts with LDI >0 at BL. d for pts with psoriatic spondylitis at BL. epooled PBO.

ACR20/50/70, ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria; ADA, adalimumab; BL, baseline; PASI75/90/100, ≥75%/90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PBO, placebo; pts, patients; UPA, upadacitinib.

Results:

Of 1704 pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug, 1419 (83.2%) completed 56 wks of treatment on study drug. Across all treatment groups, the proportions of pts who had achieved ACR20/50/70, MDA, PASI75/90/100, resolution of enthesitis, and resolution of dactylitis were maintained or further improved from wk 241 through wk 56; these proportions were generally greater for pts originally randomized to UPA vs ADA (Table 1). At wk 56, mean change from BL in mTSS was similar with UPA15, UPA30, and ADA. Improvements in pts who switched from PBO to UPA were generally similar to those originally randomized to UPA at wk 56. Through wk 56, the rates of TEAEs and serious AEs, including serious infections, were similar in the UPA15 and ADA arms and higher with UPA30 (Figure 1). The rate of herpes zoster was higher with UPA vs ADA in a dose-dependent manner. Malignancies were reported at similar rates among all treatment groups. Adjudicated venous thromboembolic events and major adverse cardiovascular events were reported in all groups with comparable rates. Two deaths were reported with UPA15, 2 with UPA30, and 1 with ADA; 1 death was reported with PBO during the 24-wk PBO-controlled period.

Conclusion:

Efficacy responses were maintained or further improved with UPA15 and UPA30 over 56 wks and were numerically higher vs ADA. The inhibition of radiographic progression was maintained at wk 56 and was similar with UPA and ADA. At wk 56, improvements in efficacy were observed in pts who switched from PBO to UPA. No new safety findings were observed with longer exposure to UPA.

References:

[1]McInnes IB et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020; 79:12

Figure 1

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie and the authors thank the patients, study sites, and investigators who participated in this clinical trial. AbbVie, Inc was the study sponsor, contributed to study design, data collection, analysis & interpretation, and to writing, reviewing, and approval of final version. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Ramona Vladea, PhD of AbbVie Inc.

Disclosure of Interests:

Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, UCB Pharma, Koji Kato Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Marina Magrey Consultant of: UCB, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Janssen, Grant/research support from: Amgen, AbbVie, and UCB Pharma, Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Celgene, Sanofi, Regeneron, Arena, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, EMD Sorono, Avotres and Leo Pharma, Mitsumasa Kishimoto Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen-Astellas BioPharma, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Ayumi Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Teijin Pharma, and UCB Pharma, Cesar Francisco Pacheco Tena Consultant of: Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Astra-Zeneca, UCB, Gilead, R-Pharm, Sanofi Regeneron, Grant/research support from: Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Astra-Zeneca, UCB, Gilead, R-Pharm, Sanofi Regeneron, Derek Haaland Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Adiga Life-Sciences, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Can-Fite Biopharma, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Liang Chen Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Yuanyuan Duan Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Patrick Zueger Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Jianzhong Liu Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Ralph Lippe Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Aileen Pangan Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Frank Behrens Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis, Genzyme, Boehringer, Janssen, MSD, Celgene, Roche, Chugai, BMS, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Janssen, Chugai, Celgene and Roche.

POS1035 UPADACITINIB AS MONOTHERAPY AND IN COMBINATION WITH NON-BIOLOGIC DMARDs FOR THE TREATMENT OF PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS FROM TWO PHASE 3 TRIALS

Background:

Approximately 40% of PsA patients (pts) on advanced therapy are on monotherapy.1,2 Upadacitinib (UPA) showed efficacy and safety in pts with active PsA in the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2 clinical trials.3,4

Objectives:

Assess efficacy and safety in subgroups of pts treated with UPA as monotherapy or in combination with non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-bDMARDs).

Methods:

The SELECT-PsA program enrolled pts with prior inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to ≥1 non-bDMARD (N=1705) and prior IR or intolerance to ≥1 bDMARD (N=642). Data from both trials was integrated for pts receiving placebo (PBO), UPA 15 mg once daily (QD) and UPA 30 mg QD. Stable background treatment of ≤2 non-bDMARDs was permitted, but not required. Analysis includes UPA monotherapy vs combination therapy for endpoints: ACR20/50/70 responses and change from baseline in pain and HAQ-DI (Wk 12); Static Investigator Global Assessment of Psoriasis of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point improvement from baseline and PASI75/90/100 responses (Wk 16); proportion of pts achieving resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis, and minimal disease activity (Wk 24). Binary outcomes, using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel-method and continuous outcomes, using mixed-effects model, were analyzed for repeated measures in the subgroups of UPA monotherapy and combination therapy. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of PBO subtracted treatment effect were calculated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed.

Results:

Of 1916 pts, 574 (30%) received monotherapy and 1342 (70%) received combination therapy; 84% in combination therapy group received MTX +/- another non-bDMARD. Both UPA monotherapy and combination therapy led to improvements in efficacy vs PBO and across endpoints, for each dose, generally consistent point estimates of PBO subtracted treatment effect and associated overlapping CIs were observed (Figure 1). Generally, frequency of AEs and serious AEs, were comparable with UPA administered as monotherapy and combination therapy (Table 1). Frequency of AEs of serious infections and hepatic disorder were lower with monotherapy while frequency of AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were lower with combination therapy. Most hepatic disorders were transient transaminase elevations.

Conclusion:

In the SELECT PsA trials, efficacy and safety of UPA was generally consistent when administered as monotherapy or when given in combination with non-bDMARDs. Results from this analysis support the use of UPA with or without concomitant non-bDMARDs.

References:

[1]Ianculescu I and Weisman MH, Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015; 33:S94–S97.

[2]Mease PJ, et al. RMD Open 2015; 1:e0000181.

[3]McInnes IB, et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020; 79:12.

[4]Genovese MC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020; 79:139.

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie and the authors thank the patients, study sites, and investigators who participated in this clinical trial. AbbVie, Inc was the study sponsor, contributed to study design, data collection, analysis & interpretation, and to writing, reviewing, and approval of final version. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Ramona Vladea of AbbVie Inc.

Disclosure of Interests:

Peter Nash Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Celgene, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Celgene, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Celgene, Pascal Richette Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, Janssen, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, and Celgene, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Janssen, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Lilly, Novartis, and Celgene, Laure Gossec Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Antonio Marchesoni Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Grant/research support from: UCB, Koji Kato Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Erin McDearmon-Blondell Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Elizabeth Lesser Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Reva McCaskill Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Dai Feng Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Jaclyn Anderson Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Eric Ruderman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer.

A multi-centre, retrospective case series of oocyte cryopreservation in unmarried women diagnosed with haematological malignancies

STUDY QUESTION

Is oocyte cryopreservation an applicable option for fertility preservation in unmarried patients with haematological malignancies?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Oocyte cryopreservation via the vitrification method is accessible and may be considered an option for fertility preservation in unmarried patients with haematological malignancies.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Haematological malignancies are most commonly observed amongst adolescent and young adult women. Although the survival rate and life expectancy of those with haematological malignancies have improved, chemotherapy and radiotherapy may impair their reproductive potential. Oocyte cryopreservation is thus an ideal option to preserve their fertility.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This study retrospectively evaluated 193 unmarried patients (age: 26.2 ± 0.4 years) with haematological malignancies, who consulted for oocyte cryopreservation across 20 different fertility centres in Japan between February 2007 and January 2015. The primary outcome measures were the oocyte retrievals and oocyte cryopreservation outcomes. The secondary outcome measures were the outcomes following oocyte warming for IVF.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

The patients had commenced ovarian stimulation cycles via antagonist, agonist, natural and minimal methods for oocyte retrievals, defined according to the treatment strategy of each respective fertility centre. A vitrification method using the Cryotop safety kit was used for oocyte cryopreservation. ICSIs were used for insemination of warmed oocytes. The endometrial preparation method for embryo transfer was hormonal replacement therapy, except in the case of a patient who underwent a spontaneous ovulatory cycle.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Among 193 patients, acute myeloid leukaemia (n = 45, 23.3%) was most common, followed by acute lymphoid leukaemia (n = 38, 19.7%) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 30, 15.5%). In total, 162 patients (83.9%) underwent oocyte retrieval, and oocytes were successfully cryopreserved for 155 patients (80.3%). The mean number of oocyte retrieval cycles and cryopreserved oocytes were 1.7 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.4, respectively. As of December 2019, 14 patients (9.2%) had requested oocyte warming for IVF. The survival rate of oocytes after vitrification-warming was 85.2% (75/88). The rates of fertilisation and embryo development were 80.0% (60/75) and 46.7% (28/60), respectively. Ten patients (71.4%) had successful embryo transfers, and seven live births (50.0%) were achieved.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was limited by its retrospective nature. Additionally, there remains an insufficient number of cases regarding the warming of vitrified oocytes to reliably conclude whether oocyte cryopreservation is effective for patients with haematological malignancies. Further long-term follow-up study is required.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Oocyte retrieval and oocyte cryopreservation were accessible for patients with haematological malignancies; however, the number of oocyte retrievals may have been limited due to the initiation of cancer treatments. Acceptable embryonic and pregnancy outcomes could be achieved following oocyte warming; therefore, our results suggest that oocyte cryopreservation can be considered an option for fertility preservation in patients with haematological malignancies.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

(S)-Erypoegin K, an isoflavone isolated from Erythrina poeppigiana, is a novel inhibitor of topoisomerase IIα: Induction of G2 phase arrest in human gastric cancer cells

Erypoegin K, an isoflavone isolated from the stem bark of Erythrina poeppigiana, has a single chiral carbon in its structure and exists naturally as a racemic mixture. Our previous study showed (S)-erypoegin K selectively exhibits potent anti-proliferative and apoptosis-inducing activity against human leukemia HL-60 cells. To identify the target molecule of (S)-erypoegin K, we employed the human cancer cell panel analysis (termed JFCR39) coupled with a drug sensitivity database of pharmacologically well-characterized drugs for comparison using the COMPARE algorithm. (S)-erypoegin K exhibited a similar profile to that of etoposide, suggesting the molecular target for erypoegin K may be topoisomerase II (Topo II). Subsequent experiments using purified human Topo IIα established that the (S)-isomer selectively stabilizes the cleavage complex composed of double-stranded plasmid DNA and the enzyme. Moreover, (S)-erypoegin K inhibited decatenation of kinetoplast DNA. Molecular docking studies clearly indicated specific binding of the (S)-isomer to the active site of Topo IIα involving hydrogen bonds that help stabilize the cleavage complex. (S)-erypoegin K displayed potent cytotoxic activity against two human gastric cancer cells GCIY and MKN-1 with IC₅₀ values of 0.270 and 0.327 μM, respectively, and induced enzyme activities of caspase 3 and 9. Cell cycle analysis showed marked cell cycle arrest at G2 phase in both cell lines. (S)-erypoegin K also displayed significant antitumor activity toward GCIY xenografted mice. The present study suggests (S)-erypoegin K acts as a Topo II inhibitor to block the G2/M transition of cancer cells.

Identification of six novel susceptibility loci for dyslipidemia by longitudinal exome-wide association studies in Japanese

Background

The circulating concentrations of triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol have a substantial genetic component. Although previous genome-wide association studies identified various genes and loci related to plasma lipid levels, those studies were conducted in a cross-sectional manner.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to identify genetic variants that confer susceptibility to hypertriglyceridemia, hypo-HDL-cholesterolemia, and hyper-LDL-cholesterolemia in Japanese. We have now performed longitudinal exome-wide association studies (EWASs) to identify novel loci for dyslipidemia by examining temporal changes in serum lipid profiles.

Methods

Longitudinal EWASs (mean follow-up period, 5 years) for hypertriglyceridemia (2056 case, 3966 controls), hypo-HDL-cholesterolemia (698 cases, 5324 controls), and hyper-LDL-cholesterolemia (2769 cases, 3251 controls) were performed with Illumina Human Exome arrays. The relation of genotypes of 24,691 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that passed quality control to dyslipidemia-related traits was examined with the generalized estimating equation (GEE). To compensate for multiple comparisons of genotypes with each of the three conditions, we applied Bonferroni's correction for statistical significance of association. Replication studies with cross-sectional data were performed for hypertriglyceridemia (2685 cases, 4703 controls), hypo-HDL-cholesterolemia (1947 cases, 6146 controls), and hyper-LDL-cholesterolemia (1719 cases, 5833 controls).

Results

Longitudinal EWASs revealed that 30 SNPs were significantly (P&lt;2.03 × 10–6 by GEE) associated with hypertriglyceridemia, 46 SNPs with hypo-HDL-cholesterolemia, and 25 SNPs with hyper-LDL-cholesterolemia. After examination of the relation of identified SNPs to serum lipid profiles, linkage disequilibrium, and results of the previous genome-wide association studies, we newly identified rs74416240 of TCHP, rs925368 of GIT2, rs7969300 of ATXN2, and rs12231744 of NAA25 as a susceptibility loci for hypo-HDL-cholesterolemia; and rs34902660 of SLC17A3 and rs1042127 of CDSN for hyper-LDL-cholesterolemia. These SNPs were not in linkage disequilibrium with those previously reported to be associated with dyslipidemia, indicating independent effects of the SNPs identified in the present study on serum concentrations of HDL-cholesterol or LDL-cholesterol in Japanese. According to allele frequency data from the 1000 Genomes project database, five of the six identified SNPs were monomorphic or rare variants in European populations. In the replication study, all six SNPs were associated with dyslipidemia-related phenotypes.

Conclusion

We have thus identified six novel loci that confer susceptibility to hypo-HDL-cholesterolemia or hyper-LDL-cholesterolemia. Determination of genotypes for these SNPs at these loci may prove informative for assessment of the genetic risk for dyslipidemia in Japanese.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None