Human chorionic gonadotropin attracts regulatory T cells into the fetal-maternal interface during early human pregnancy

Regulatory T cells (Treg) expand during pregnancy and are present at the fetal-maternal interface at very early stages in pregnancy. The migration mechanisms of Treg to the pregnant uterus are still unclear. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is secreted by the blastocyst immediately after fertilization and has chemoattractant properties. Therefore, we sought to analyze whether hCG secreted by early trophoblasts attracts Treg to the uterus and hence contributes to maternal tolerance toward the fetus. Decidua and placenta tissue samples from patients having spontaneous abortions or ectopic pregnancies were employed to evaluate Treg and hCG levels. Age-matched samples from normal pregnant women served as controls. We further performed in vitro studies with primary first trimester trophoblast cells and a choriocarcinoma cell line (JEG-3) aiming to evaluate the ability of secreted hCG to attract Treg. Patients having miscarriages or ectopic pregnancy presented significantly decreased hCG mRNA and protein levels associated with decreased Foxp3, neuropilin-1, IL-10, and TGF-beta mRNA levels as compared with normal pregnant women. Using migration assays we demonstrated that Treg were attracted by hCG-producing trophoblasts or choriocarcinoma cells. Treg migration toward cells transfected with hCG expression vectors confirmed the chemoattractant ability of hCG. Our data clearly show that hCG produced by trophoblasts attracts Treg to the fetal-maternal interface. High hCG levels at very early pregnancy stages ensure Treg to migrate to the site of contact between paternal Ags and maternal immune cells and to orchestrate immune tolerance toward the fetus.

Identification of two regulatory binding sites which confer myotube specific expression of the mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase ART1 gene

BACKGROUND

Mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (ART) 1 belongs to a family of mammalian ectoenzymes that catalyze the transfer of ADP-ribose from NAD+ to a target protein. ART1 is predominantly expressed in skeletal and cardiac muscle. It ADP-ribosylates alpha7-integrin which together with beta1-integrin forms a dimer and binds to laminin, a protein of the extracellular matrix involved in cell adhesion. This posttranslational modification leads to an increased laminin binding affinity.

RESULTS

Using C2C12 and C3H-10T 1/2 cells as models of myogenesis, we found that ART1 expression was restricted to myotube formation. We identified a fragment spanning the gene 1.3 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site as the functional promoter of the ART1 gene. This region contains an E box and an A/T-rich element, two conserved binding sites for transcription factors found in the promoters of most skeletal muscle specific genes. Mutating the DNA consensus sequence of either the E box or the A/T-rich element resulted in a nearly complete loss of ART1 promoter inducibility, indicating a cooperative role of the transcription factors binding to those sites. Gel mobility shift analyses carried out with nuclear extracts from C2C12 and C3H-10T 1/2 cells revealed binding of myogenin to the E box and MEF-2 to the A/T-rich element, the binding being restricted to C2C12 and C3H-10T 1/2 myotubes.

CONCLUSION

Here we describe the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of the ART1 gene expression in skeletal muscle cells. The differentiation-dependent upregulation of ART1 mRNA is induced by the binding of myogenin to an E box and of MEF-2 to an A/T-rich element in the proximal promoter region of the ART1 gene. Thus the transcriptional regulation involves molecular mechanisms similar to those used to activate muscle-specific genes.

Transcriptional activation of the tumor suppressor and differentiation gene S100A2 by a novel p63-binding site

S100A2 is generally found expressed in the epidermis and was recently shown to play a crucial role in the differentiation of keratinocytes. Also known as CaN19, S100A2 was identified as a potential tumor suppressor. Expression of S100A2 is upregulated by p53. The proteins p63 and p73 are related to p53 and are expressed as several splice variants with partially overlapping tasks but also functions different from p53. It had been shown that p63 proteins with mutations in their DNA-binding domain cause severe phenotypes in man as autosomal dominantly inherited disease including EEC, AEC, SHFM, LMS and ADULT syndromes. Here we show that S100A2 is a transcriptional target of p63/p73 family members, particularly the p63 splice variant TAp63γ. The regulation is mediated by a novel transcriptional element in the S100A2 promoter which is bound by TAp63γ but not by p53. Mutant p63 proteins derived from EEC and ADULT syndrome patients cannot activate S100A2 transcription whereas SHFM-related mutants still can stimulate the S100A2 promoter. Consistent with a function in tumor suppression S100A2 expression is stimulated upon DNA damage. After doxorubicin treatment p63γ proteins are recruited to the S100A2 promoter in vivo. This may indicate a function of the p63-dependent S100A2 regulation in tumor suppression.

The CCN3 gene coding for an extracellular adhesion-related protein is transcriptionally activated by the p53 tumor suppressor

The CCN3 protein (Nov, Nephroblastoma overexpressed) is a member of the CCN family (Cyr61, CTGF, Nov) of growth regulators and exerts antiproliferative properties. We show here that the tumor suppressor p53 transcriptionally upregulates the CCN3 gene. p53 is an important transcription factor contributing to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis after cell damage through the regulation of numerous target genes. We show that CCN3 mRNA and protein are upregulated following p53 expression. A DNA binding-deficient p53 mutant fails to regulate CCN3. CCN3 protein is located in the perinuclear space after induction and is also exported to the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, the CCN3 promoter is inducible by p53 and the response element is located in the first exon of the CCN3 gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitations show that p53 binds to the CCN3 promoter in vivo. As CCN3 was shown to inhibit cell growth, transcriptional induction by p53 may serve as an antiproliferative signal in the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, CCN3 depletion was also reported to reduce collagen type IV-dependent adhesion of melanocytes. Thus, elevated levels of CCN3 protein regulated by p53 might influence cell adhesion.

Cell cycle-dependent transcription of cyclin B2 is influenced by DNA methylation but is independent of methylation in the CDE and CHR elements

DNA methylation is an important mechanism involved in embryogenesis and tumor development. Changing cytosines to 5-methylcytosines in CpG dinucleotides has been found to be responsible for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes by repressing transcription. A central cell cycle regulator whose synthesis is controlled by transcription is cyclin B. In mammalian cells, cyclin B1 and B2 proteins are well characterized and often found to be overexpressed in cancer patients. Transcription from cyclin B1 and B2 promoters during the cell cycle is dependent upon a combination of two sites named 'cell cycle-dependent element' (CDE) and 'cell cycle genes homology region' (CHR), through repression in G(0) and G(1) followed by release in G(2)/M. Here we show that the cyclin B2 promoter contains a CpG island and that 5-aza-deoxycytidine treatment leads to deregulation of cell cycle-dependent mRNA expression from this gene via a loss of repression in G(0). Furthermore, deletion of the DNA methyltransferase genes DNMT1 and DNMT3b leads to an increase in transcription of cyclin B2. Additionally, DNA methylation in vitro prevents transcriptional activation of the cyclin B2 promoter in G(2)/M. Analysis in vivo of the cyclin B2 core promoter revealed that the CDE/CHR site is partially methylated. However, quantitative in vivo analysis of the CpG-methylation level of the CDE during cell division indicates that CpG methylation is independent of the cell cycle. We conclude that DNA methylation affects cell cycle-dependent transcription of cyclin B2 but that regulation through CDE/CHR is independent of cytosine methylation.

Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase subunit 1 (Cks1) is regulated during the cell cycle by a CDE/CHR tandem element and is downregulated by p53 but not by p63 or p73

Cks1 is a member of the cyclin-dependent kinase subunit family. These proteins are essential components of cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) complexes contributing to cell cycle control in all eukaryotes. Cks1 protein is found overexpressed in a number of tumors. Expression of Cks1 mRNA starts in late G1 reaching a peak in S/G2-phases of the cell cycle. We find that this expression pattern depends on transcriptional regulation and is controlled by a combination of a cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) together with a cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) in the Cks1 promoter. Furthermore, we observe Cks1 mRNA and protein to be downregulated after induced expression of the tumor suppressor p53. This repression is due to p53 downregulating transcription from the Cks1 promoter. p53-dependent repression is seen in a dose-dependent manner and in several cell types of different origin. In contrast to p53, its homologues p63 and p73 do not significantly repress transcription from the Cks1 promoter. The Cks1 promoter does not contain a p53 binding site. For some promoters the CCAAT box-binding transcription factor NF-Y had been implicated in p53-dependent repression. NF-Y is the main activator for Cks1 transcription but does not influence p53-dependent repression from the Cks1 promoter. Generally, the observation that the potential oncogene Cks1 is downregulated by the tumor suppressor p53 corresponds well with the idea that p53 employs multiple ways in order to halt the cell cycle.

Gene expression of cyclin-dependent kinase subunit Cks2 is repressed by the tumor suppressor p53 but not by the related proteins p63 or p73

Cks2 proteins are essential components of cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase complexes and contribute to cell cycle control. We identify Cks2 as a transcriptional target downregulated by the tumor suppressor p53. Cks2 expression was found to be repressed by p53 both at the mRNA and the protein levels. p53 downregulates transcription from the Cks2 promoter in a dose-dependent manner and in all cell types tested. This repression appears to be independent of p53 binding to the Cks2 promoter. In contrast to p53, neither p63 nor p73 proteins can repress Cks2 transcription. Thus p53, rather than its homologues p63 and p73, may contribute to control of the first metaphase/anaphase transition of mammalian meiosis by downregulation of Cks2 expression.

Chimpanzee, Orangutan, Mouse, and Human Cell Cycle Promoters Exempt CCAAT Boxes and CHR Elements from Interspecies Differences

Mechanisms regulating the cell division cycle are well conserved among all eukaryotes. Consistently many proteins regulating the cell cycle are functionally interchangeable between many organisms. Cell division control is regulated on different levels of which the transcriptional level appears to be particularly important for controlling synthesis of many cell cycle proteins. We had earlier described transcription factor-binding sites essential for regulating genes important for the transition from the G(2) phase to mitosis. A tandem repressor site named cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) and cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) are responsible for the correct expression during the cell cycle. Another feature of these G(2)/M-specific promoters is the activation through 2 or 3 CCAAT boxes binding the transcription factor nuclear factor-Y (NF-Y). These major activating sites have to be spaced 32 or 33 bp apart to be fully functional. We were interested in looking at the evolutionary changes in regulatory elements and overall promoter structure of 3 well-characterized cell cycle genes. Here, we compare the DNA sequences and functional features of the cdc25C, cyclin B1, and cyclin B2 promoters from humans, mouse, chimpanzee, and orangutan. We find numerous differences in the nucleotide sequence between mouse and primate promoters. However, CHR and CCAAT boxes stand out in that they are perfectly conserved in all promoters tested. The CDE site contains nucleotide exchanges between mouse and primate promoters. Comparing sequences and functions of chimpanzee, orangutan, and human promoters, we observe a complete conservation in nucleotide sequence of the regulatory elements. Functional assays of the cyclin B1, cyclin B2, and cdc25C promoters yield moderate variations in activity and thereby a good conservation of function. Although we find nucleotide differences in cell cycle promoters between orangutan and humans of about 5%, there are never changes in any of the CCAAT boxes or CDE/CHR sites in the cyclin B1, cyclin B2, and cdc25C promoters. Furthermore, we describe the influence of the tumor suppressor p53 and the transcriptional activator NF-Y on regulation of the newly cloned primate promoters.

p53 downregulates expression of the G1/S cell cycle phosphatase Cdc25A

Overexpression of Cdc25A phosphatase is often observed in cancer and results in poor prognosis. Cdc25A mainly dephosphorylates and thereby activates Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and thus induces progression in the cell cycle from G(1) to S phase. Here, we demonstrate that the tumor suppressor p53 downregulates expression from the Cdc25A gene. In a p53-inducible cell system, Cdc25A expression on the mRNA and protein level is downregulated upon p53 expression. Promoter-reporter assays show that this regulation is dependent on the Cdc25A promoter. Mutant p53 fails to reduce Cdc25A transcription. In contrast to p53, neither p63 nor p73 can repress Cdc25A transcription. The Cdc25A promoter displays no p53 binding site, and p53 does not bind directly to the promoter DNA as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Previously, the contribution of p53 to G(1)/S arrest has been mostly linked to activating the expression of the Cdk inhibitor p21(WAF1/CIP1). By downregulating Cdc25A expression, p53 may impair transition from G(1) to S phase independently of p21(WAF1/CIP1). Therefore, the data suggest that, as long as p53 is intact, Cdc25A transcriptional downregulation might play a role in cancer prevention.

Genomic organization and expression of the human mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase ART3 gene

Here we describe an RT-PCR analysis of mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 (ART3) mRNA expression in macrophages, testis, semen, tonsil, heart and skeletal muscle and the complete gene structure as obtained by sequence alignment of PCR products with a human genomic clone (GenBank accession no. AC112719). Twelve exons (ex1-12) were found to make up the coding region of the gene (one more than previously published). Two prominent classes of ART3 splice variants could be distinguished by the presence or absence of ex2 which encodes most of ART3 protein. Among the ex2-containing mRNA species, the most frequently amplified variant did not include exons 9 to 11, except in skeletal muscle, in which the major splice variant lacked ex10 only. Two different, previously not reported 5' non-translated regions (5' UTRs) were identified, demonstrating the presence of two alternative promoters that we termed palpha and pbeta. Whereas the 5'UTR originating from palpha, was split up into three exons, a single exon represented the 5' UTR of pbeta transcripts. Strikingly, in heart, skeletal muscle and tonsils the upstream promoter palpha was totally inactive and ART3 transcription appears to be driven solely by pbeta. In all other cell types tested, transcription started mainly (if not exclusively) at palpha. Thus, ART3 expression in human cells appears to be governed by a combination of differential splicing and tissue-preferential use of two alternative promoters. This specific use is evolutionary conserved as shown by analysis of the 5' UTR of the mouse ART3 mRNA.

Human cyclin B3. mRNA expression during the cell cycle and identification of three novel nonclassical nuclear localization signals

Cyclins form complexes with cyclin-dependent kinases. By controlling activity of the enzymes, cyclins regulate progression through the cell cycle. A- and B-type cyclins were discovered due to their distinct appearance in S and G(2) phases and their rapid proteolytic destruction during mitosis. Transition from G(2) to mitosis is basically controlled by B-type cyclins. In mammals, two cyclin B proteins are well characterized, cyclin B1 and cyclin B2. Recently, a human cyclin B3 gene was described. In contrast to the expression pattern of other B-type cyclins, we find cyclin B3 mRNA expressed not only in S and G(2)/M cells but also in G(0) and G(1). Human cyclin B3 is expressed in different variants. We show that one isoform remains in the cytoplasm, whereas the other variant is translocated to the nucleus. Transport to the nucleus is dependent on three autonomous nonclassical nuclear localization signals that where previously not implicated in nuclear translocation. It had been shown that cyclin B3 coimmunoprecipitates with cdk2; but this complex does not exhibit any kinase activity. Furthermore, a degradation-resistant version of cyclin B3 can arrest cells in G(1) and G(2). Taken together with the finding that cyclin B3 mRNA is not only expressed in G(2)/M but is also detected in significant amounts in resting cells and in G(1) cells. This may suggest a dominant-negative function of human cyclin B3 in competition with activating cyclins in G(0) and the G(1) phase of the cell cycle.

The p53-family members p63 and p73 inhibit insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in colon cancer cells

The insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) has a critical role in malignant transformation. Consistent with its antiapoptotic role, the IGF-IR gene is overexpressed in most types of cancer, including colorectal tumors. The recently identified p53 homologues, p63 and p73, exhibit some of the biological properties of p53, including the ability to transactivate p53-responsive genes and to induce apoptosis. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that p63/p73 proteins may contribute to colon cancer cell proliferation via mechanism/s that involve regulation of IGF-IR gene expression. Using transient co-expression assays in colon cancer-derived HCT116 cells, we showed that both proteins inhibit IGF-IR promoter activity and endogenous IGF-IR levels in a dose-dependent manner, whereas mutant proteins are significantly impaired in their ability to suppress IGF-IR gene expression. These results are compatible with the notion that disruption of p63/p73-mediated signal transduction pathways in colon cancer may lead to increased IGF-IR gene transcription. In summary, we have identified the IGF-IR gene as a novel downstream target for p63/p73 action.

Analysis of mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase 4 gene expression in human monocytes: splicing pattern and potential regulatory elements

Mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (ART) 4 belongs to a family of ectoenzymes that catalyze the transfer of ADP-ribose from NAD+ to a target protein. ART4 could be detected on HEL cells and erythrocytes by FACS analysis while it was absent from activated monocytes, despite the presence of ART4 mRNA in these cells. The predicted glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) linkage of ART4 could be verified by showing that treatment of erythrocytes, HEL cells and ART4-transfected HEK-293-T cells with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C results in a decrease in ART4 expression. Furthermore, an ART4 construct carrying an Ala285Val mutation that is critical for the formation of a GPI anchor failed to be expressed in transfected C-33A cells. Analysis of the gene structure revealed that the first of the three exons was at least 236 bp longer than previously published and that splicing occurred in the coding region of the mRNA from HEL cells and monocytes. When carrying out 5' inverse RACE-PCR we confirmed the existence of 5 ATGs in the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR). By deletion and site-directed mutagenesis of the ATGs, we showed that the first two ATGs impair translation and that both the 3rd and 5th ATG can be used for translation initiation after expression in C-33A cells. On analysis of the 3'UTR, which contains 2 adenylate/uridylate-rich elements (AREs), we detected one variant in monocytes that would be devoid of a GPI-anchor signal and thus could represent a secreted form of ART4. Thus, alternative splicing and the use of regulatory elements in the 5'UTR and 3'UTR represent means to control ART4 expression.

TAp63γ can substitute for p53 in inducing expression of themaspintumor suppressor

Maspin is a Class II tumor suppressor protein and plays a role in tumor growth by inhibiting cellular invasion and motility. It is a member of the serpin family of protease inhibitors and has been shown to reduce angiogenesis. Maspin gene expression can be upregulated by the tumor suppressor p53. We tested 7 p53-related proteins of the p63 and p73 families for their ability to induce maspin expression. The p63 splice form TAp63gamma can substitute for p53 in activating the maspin promoter. TAp63gamma activates the promoter through the same consensus site as p53. In the DLD-1 colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line, harboring a tet-off regulated transgene, induction of TAp63gamma leads to an upregulation of maspin mRNA from the chromosomal gene. With a short lag phase also maspin protein levels are elevated after induced TAp63gamma expression. To assess a potential function of p63-dependent maspin upregulation in tumors we followed expression of p53, p63 and maspin by immunohistochemistry in hepatocellular carcinomas. Two types of tumors with wild-type or mutant p53 were assayed. Interestingly, the majority of tumors expressing only a mutated and inactive p53 protein nonetheless stain positive for maspin, whereas these tumors were positive for p63 protein expression. In summary, we show that TAp63gamma can substitute for p53 in transcriptional activation of the maspin tumor suppressor gene. TAp63gamma employs the same DNA recognition site for this activation as p53. We observe expression patterns of p53, p63 and maspin proteins in tumor tissue that may indicate also a function of maspin induction by p63 in tumors.

SIRF--a novel regulator element controlling transcription from the p55Cdc/Fizzy promoter during the cell cycle

p55Cdc proteins participate in activation and timing of ubiquitin ligation by APC/C. Labeling of the substrates with ubiquitin leads to degradation of the cell cycle proteins through the proteasome in mitosis. Consistent with the phase in which the protein functions p55Cdc mRNA is expressed during the cell cycle starting in S phase with a maximum in G2/M. We analyzed the human p55Cdc promoter responsible for this expression pattern and found with SIRF (Cell-Cycle Site-Regulating p55Cdc/Fizzy-Transcription) a novel element which downregulates transcription in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Activation of gene transcription is independent of the SIRF element and NF-Y. The nucleotide sequence of SIRF is essentially identical in human, rat, and mouse p55Cdc whereas other parts of the promoter are not conserved. SIRF requires its natural promoter context for its regulatory function. With a length of 44 nucleotides this element is unusually long and may require a large protein complex for its regulation.

Identification of Tcf-4 as a transcriptional target of p53 signalling

T-cell factor (Tcf)-4 is a main transcription factor to pass on Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. The tumour suppressor protein p53 contributes as a transcription factor to cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis induction. Mutations of components in p53 and Wnt/beta-catenin signalling networks play a part in tumour formation. Here, we identify the Tcf-4 gene as a downstream effector of p53. Induction of wild-type p53 in a tet-off regulated human colon cell system leads to the reduction of Tcf-4 mRNA and protein levels. Also, mRNA of the Tcf-4 target gene uPAR is downregulated after p53 induction. Expression of a luciferase reporter controlled by the Tcf-4 promoter is repressed by wild-type p53, but not by a p53 mutant deficient in DNA binding. Such a regulation is seen in cell lines of different origin. These findings directly link Wnt/beta-catenin signalling and p53 tumour suppressor function and may provide a mechanism by which loss of p53 function contributes to progression in the adenoma/carcinoma sequence in colon tumours. Furthermore, since Tcf-4 is expressed in many tissues and downregulation of Tcf-4 by p53 is seen in several different cell types, this regulation likely plays a role in proliferation control of all tissues that can express p53 and Tcf-4.

Three CCAAT-boxes and a single cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) are the major regulating sites for transcription from the human cyclin B2 promoter

Cyclins are essential regulators of the cell division cycle. Cyclin B associates with the cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdc2) to form a complex which is required for cells to undergo mitosis. In mammalian cells three B-type cyclins have been characterised, cyclin B1, B2 and B3. The cell cycle-dependent synthesis of cyclin B1 and B2 has been investigated in detail displaying maximum expression in G2 which is mainly regulated on the transcriptional level. We have previously shown that this regulation of the mouse cyclin B2 promoter is controlled by a cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) and the cell cycle genes homology region (CHR). Also in a number of other genes CDE/CHR elements repress transcription in G0 and G1 and lead to relief of repression later during the cell cycle. Here, we compare human and mouse cyclin B2 promoters. Both promoters share only nine regions with nucleotide identities. Three of these sites are CCAAT-boxes spaced 33 bp apart which can bind the NF-Y transcriptional activator. NF-Y binding to the human cyclin B2 promoter could be shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. Activation by NF-Y is responsible for more than 93% of the total promoter activity as measured by cotransfecting a plasmid coding for a dominant-negative form of NF-YA. Cell cycle-dependent repression is regulated solely through a CHR. Surprisingly, in contrast to the mouse promoter the CHR in the human cyclin B2 promoter does not rely on a CDE site in tandem with it. Together with the recently described mouse cdc25C promoter, human cyclin B2 is the second identified gene which solely requires a CHR for its cell cycle regulation.

Interactions between p300 and multiple NF-Y trimers govern cyclin B2 promoter function

The CCAAT box is one of the most common elements in eukaryotic promoters and is activated by NF-Y, a conserved trimeric transcription factor with histone-like subunits. Usually one CCAAT element is present in promoters at positions between -60 and -100, but an emerging class of promoters harbor multiple NF-Y sites. In the triple CCAAT-containing cyclin B2 cell-cycle promoter, all CCAAT boxes, independently from their NF-Y affinities, are important for function. We investigated the relationships between NF-Y and p300. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis found that NF-Y and p300 are bound to the cyclin B2 promoter in vivo and that their binding is regulated during the cell cycle, positively correlating with promoter function. Cotransfection experiments determined that the coactivator acts on all CCAAT boxes and requires a precise spacing between the three elements. We established the order of in vitro binding of the three NF-Y complexes and find decreasing affinities from the most distal Y1 to the proximal Y3 site. Binding of two or three NF-Y trimers with or without p300 is not cooperative, but association with the Y1 and Y2 sites is extremely stable. p300 favors the binding of NF-Y to the weak Y3 proximal site, provided that a correct distance between the three CCAAT is respected. Our data indicate that the precise spacing of multiple CCAAT boxes is crucial for coactivator function. Transient association to a weak site might be a point of regulation during the cell cycle and a general theme of multiple CCAAT box promoters.

Cyclin B1 transcription is enhanced by the p300 coactivator and regulated during the cell cycle by a CHR-dependent repression mechanism

Cyclin B is a central regulator of transition from the G(2) phase of the cell cycle to mitosis. In mammalian cells two B-type cyclins have been characterised, cyclin B1 and B2. Both are expressed with a maximum in G(2) and their synthesis is mainly regulated on the transcriptional level. We show that a single cell cycle genes homology region, lacking a functional cell cycle-dependent element in tandem with it, contributes most of the cell cycle-dependent transcription from the cyclin B1 promoter. The coactivator p300 binds to the cyclin B1 promoter and synergises with the transcription factor NF-Y in activating transcription of cyclin B1.

Differential regulation of transcription and induction of programmed cell death by human p53-family members p63 and p73

The p53 tumor suppressor acts as a transcription factor and has a central function in controlling apoptosis. With p63 and p73 two genes coding for proteins homologous to p53 have been identified. We describe the properties of seven human p63 and p73 proteins as transcriptional activators of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression and apoptotic inducers in direct comparison to p53 in the same assay systems employing DLD-1-tet-off colon cells. Programmed cell death is detected in cells expressing high levels of p53 and p73alpha. Cells overexpressing TAp63alpha, TAp63gamma, TA*p63alpha, TA*p63gamma, DeltaNp63alpha, and DeltaNp63gamma display low or no detectable apoptosis.

A single cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) controls cell cycle-dependent transcription of the cdc25C phosphatase gene and is able to cooperate with E2F or Sp1/3 sites

The cdc25C phosphatase participates in regulating transition from the G2 phase of the cell cycle to mitosis by dephosphorylating cyclin-dependent kinase 1. The tumor suppressor p53 down-regulates expression of cdc25C as part of G2/M checkpoint control. Transcription of cdc25C oscillates during the cell cycle with no expression in resting cells and maximum transcription in G2. We had identified earlier a new mechanism of cell cycle-dependent transcription that is regulated by a cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) in conjunction with a cell cycle genes homology region (CHR). The human cdc25C gene was the first example. CDE/CHR tandem elements have since been found in promoters of many cell cycle genes. Here we show that the mouse cdc25C gene is regulated by a CHR but does not hold a CDE. Therefore, it is the first identified gene with CHR-dependent transcriptional regulation during the cell cycle not relying on a CDE located upstream of it. The CHR leads to repression of cdc25C transcription early in the cell cycle and directs a release of this repression in G2. Furthermore, we find that this CHR can cooperate in cell cycle-dependent transcription with elements placed directly upstream of it binding E2F, Sp1 or Sp3 transcription factors.

Regulation and possible function of beta-catenin in human monocytes

In this study, we demonstrate that adherence factors, serum constituents, LPS, and zymosan are capable of inducing a cellular accumulation of beta-catenin in human monocytes. Whereas adherence-dependent accumulation of beta-catenin can be blocked by wortmannin, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, accumulation induced by the remaining stimuli cannot be prevented by inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, implying the involvement of beta-catenin in other not yet described signal transduction pathways. A role of beta-catenin in adherence-dependent processes by interacting with classical cadherins can be excluded as we could not detect cadherins in monocytes. To test whether it is possible that beta-catenin interacts with LEF/TCF (lymphoid enhancer factor/T cell factor) transcription factors, we studied the expression of this protein family. TCF-4 was identified as the LEF/TCF transcription factor present in human monocytes. However, neither cellular induction of beta-catenin nor cotransfection experiments with beta-catenin conducted in the monocytic cell line THP-1 resulted in the activation of a LEF/TCF-dependent promoter, suggesting the requirement of additional signals. Concurrent with this suggestion, we found that LPS and zymosan, two physiological inducers of beta-catenin, caused an increase in the expression of genes that are positively regulated by beta-catenin.

Expression of the p53 homologues p63 and p73 in multiple simultaneous gastric cancer

The tumour-suppressor protein p53 has recently been shown to belong to a family that includes two structurally related proteins, p63 and p73. This study investigated the status of p53 and its two homologues in multiple simultaneous gastric carcinomas. Expression and mutation of p53, p73 and p63 including the two major isotypes TAp63 and black triangleNp63, were examined by direct DNA-sequencing, in situ hybridization, western blotting and immunohistochemistry in 68 gastric carcinomas of 32 patients. The results obtained were correlated with pathohistological stage (according to UICC(16)) and several other histopathological factors and finally with patient survival. p53 mutations were detected in 23/68 carcinomas (34%) from 18 patients with a discordant mutation pattern. Independently of p53 mutation status, p73 transcripts and protein expression were found in 33/68 carcinomas from 24 patients. p63 positivity was found in 21 patients; 25 out of 68 tumours expressed p63. The number of cells containing p63 and their distribution depend on the degree of tumour differentiation. High grade carcinomas of the diffuse type exhibited a significantly higher p63 expression. In intestinal metaplasia and atrophic gastritis, an increase of TAp63 and black triangleNp63 staining was also observed. Specific mutations of p73 or p63 causing amino acid substitutions were not identified. Neither p53, p73 nor p63 were related to prognosis. p73 and p63 have rarely been found to be mutated in gastric carcinomas, but both proteins were expressed in only a subset of tumours. The status of these p53 homologues was discordant in all patients with multiple simultaneous gastric carcinomas. The increased expression of p63 (TAp63 and black triangleNp63) in less well differentiated gastric carcinomas may indicate that p63 can act to promote neoplastic growth in the gastric epithelium.

Expression of the cell cycle phosphatase cdc25C is down-regulated by the tumor suppressor protein p53 but not by p73

The cdc25C phosphatase dephosphorylates cdc2 kinase which then in complex with cyclin B can catalyse transition from the G(2) phase to mitosis. We demonstrate that transcription of cdc25C is repressed by p53 in a dose-dependent manner. In stably transfected DLD-1 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, cdc25C expression is down-regulated when p53 is induced from a (tet)-off-regulated system. In contrast to p53, its homologue p73 is not able to down-modulate cdc25C expression. A previously identified site in the cdc25C promoter can bind p53 in vitro and, when placed in a heterologous construct, is able to activate transcription. However, transcriptional repression by p53 is not mediated through this site but is dependent on a segment containing three CCAAT-boxes. In general down-regulation of cdc25C transcription by reducing the levels of active cdc2 kinase contributes to G(2) arrest and G(2)/M checkpoint control. This reveals functional differences between p73 and p53 in regulating cell division.

NF-Y mediates the transcriptional inhibition of the cyclin B1, cyclin B2, and cdc25C promoters upon induced G2 arrest

During normal cell cycles, the function of mitotic cyclin-cdk1 complexes, as well as of cdc25C phosphatase, is required for G2 phase progression. Accordingly, the G2 arrest induced by DNA damage is associated with a down-regulation of mitotic cyclins, cdk1, and cdc25C phosphatase expression. We found that the promoter activity of these genes is repressed in the G2 arrest induced by DNA damage. We asked whether the CCAAT-binding NF-Y modulates mitotic cyclins, cdk1, and cdc25C gene transcription during this type of G2 arrest. In our experimental conditions, the integrity of the CCAAT boxes of cyclin B1, cyclin B2, and cdc25C promoters, as well as the presence of a functional NF-Y complex, is strictly required for the transcriptional inhibition of these promoters. Furthermore, a dominant-negative p53 protein, impairing doxorubicin-induced G2 arrest, prevents transcriptional down-regulation of the mitotic cyclins, cdk1, and cdc25C genes. We conclude that, as already demonstrated for cdk1, NF-Y mediates the transcriptional inhibition of the mitotic cyclins and the cdc25C genes during p53-dependent G2 arrest induced by DNA damage. These data suggest a transcriptional regulatory role of NF-Y in the G2 checkpoint after DNA damage.