Prevalence of cannabis use for pain management in Quebec: A post-legalization estimate among generations living with chronic pain

Background

Medical cannabis has been legal in Canada since 2001, and recreational cannabis was legalized in October 2018, which has led to a widespread increase in the accessibility of cannabis products.

Aims

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of cannabis use among adults living with chronic pain (CP) and investigate the relationship between age and cannabis use for CP management.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of the COPE Cohort data set, a large Quebec sample of 1935 adults living with CP, was conducted. Participants completed a web-based questionnaire in 2019 that contained three yes/no questions about past-year use of cannabis (i.e., for pain management, management of other health-related conditions, recreational purposes).

Results

Among the 1344 participants who completed the cannabis use section of the questionnaire, the overall prevalence of cannabis use for pain management was 30.1% (95% confidence interval 27.7-32.7). Differences were found between age groups, with the highest prevalence among participants aged ≤26 years (36.5%) and lowest for those aged ≥74 years (8.8%). A multivariable logistic model revealed that age, region of residence, generalized pain, use of medications or nonpharmacological approaches for pain management, alcohol/drug consumption, and smoking were associated with the likelihood of using cannabis for pain management.

Conclusions

Cannabis is a common treatment for the management of CP, especially in younger generations. The high prevalence of use emphasizes the importance of better knowledge translation for people living with CP, rapidly generating evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of cannabis, and clinicians' involvement in supporting people who use cannabis for pain management.

What methods are used to study the association between medication adherence trajectories, estimated with the group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) method, and health-related outcomes?-a protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) method is increasingly used in pharmacoepidemiologic studies to describe medication adherence trajectories over time. However, assessing the associations between these medication adherence trajectories and health-related outcomes remains challenging. The purpose of this review is to identify and systematically review the methods used to assess the association between medication adherence trajectories, estimated from the GBTM method, and health-related outcomes.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review according to the recommendations of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 6.2. Results will be reported following PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations. We will search in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently select articles and extract data. Discrepancies at every step will be resolved through discussion, and consensus will be reached for all disagreed articles. A third reviewer will act as a referee if needed. We will produce tables to synthesize the modalities used to estimate medication adherence trajectories with GBTM. We will also synthesize the modalities used to assess the association between these medication adherence trajectories and health-related outcomes by identifying the types of health-related outcomes studied and how they are defined, the statistical models used, and how the medication adherence trajectories were used in these models, and the effect measure yield. We will also review the limitations and biases reported by the authors and their attempts to mitigate them. We will provide a narrative synthesis.

DISCUSSION

This review will provide a thorough exploration of the strategies and methods used in medication adherence research to estimate the associations between medication adherence trajectories, estimated with GBTM, and the different health-related outcomes. It will represent the first crucial steps toward optimizing these methods in adherence studies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Prospero CRD42021213503 .

Gender Differences in Medication Adverse Effects Experienced by People Living With Chronic Pain

Objectives

Understanding gender differences in chronic pain (CP) outcome research is essential to optimal treatment delivery. This study explored the associations between gender identity, gender roles, and the number of non-life-threatening pain medication adverse effects reported as severe by people living with CP.

Methods

The analyses were conducted using the COPE Cohort, a dataset generated through a web-based recruitment of adults with CP. Participants were asked how they identified themselves (women, men, unknown, unspecified) and gender roles were measured using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (subgroups were formed applying the median split method). Pain medication adverse effects were assessed using a standardized checklist (none/mild/moderate/severe). A zero-inflated Poisson model was used to assess gender identity, gender roles and their interaction as potential predictors of the number of pain medication adverse effects.

Results

A total of 1,343 participants reported using pain medications. Adjusting for potential confounders, both gender identity (men vs. women: ß = −0.32, p = 0.0024) and gender roles (androgynous vs. undifferentiated: ß = 0.26, p = 0.0030) were associated with the number of pain medication adverse effects reported as severe, and they interacted with each other. The stratified analysis by gender roles showed that women reported a greater number of severe adverse effects than men among those classified as masculine and androgynous.

Discussion

Although we are unable to confirm whether the associations can be explained by differences in the experience or in the reporting of effects, gender identity and gender roles should both be explored when studying pain medication adverse effects.

Depression and the risk of hospitalization in type 2 diabetes patients: A nested case-control study accounting for non-persistence to antidiabetic treatment

INTRODUCTION

Depression is one of the most common comorbidities of type 2 diabetes. The relationship between these two diseases seems to be bidirectional. Both conditions separately lead to significant morbidity and mortality, including hospitalization. Moreover, depression is associated with non-persistence with antidiabetic drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the effect of depression on morbidity and particularly on all-cause, diabetes-related, cardiovascular-related and major cardiovascular events-related hospitalization, adjusting for non-persistence to antidiabetic drugs and other confounders.

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study within a cohort of type 2 diabetic individuals initiating antidiabetic drugs. Using the health administrative data of the province of Quebec, Canada, we identified all-cause, diabetes-related, cardiovascular-related and major cardiovascular hospitalizations during a maximum follow-up of eight years after the initiation of antidiabetic drug treatment. A density sampling method matched all cases with up to 10 controls by age, sex, and the Elixhauser comorbidity index. The effect of depression on hospitalization was estimated using conditional logistic regressions adjusting for non-persistence to antidiabetic drug treatment and other variables.

RESULTS

We identified 41,550 all-cause hospitalized cases, of which 34,437 were related to cardiovascular (CV) diseases, 29,584 to diabetes, and 13,867 to major CV events. Depression was diagnosed in 2.51% of all-cause hospitalizations and 1.16% of matched controls. 69.11% of cases and 72.59% of controls were on metformin monotherapy. The majority (71.62% vs 75.02%, respectively) stayed on metformin monotherapy without adding or switching drugs during follow-up. Non-persistence was at similar rates (about 30%) in both groups. In the multivariable analyses, depression was associated with an increased risk for all-cause hospitalizations, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 2.21 (95% CI: 2.07-2.37) to 1.32 (95% CI: 1.22-1.44) according to the model adjustment (from the univariate to the fully adhjusted).

CONCLUSION

Depression increased the risk of all-cause hospitalizations among patients treated for diabetes, even after accounting for non-persistence and other potentially confounding factors. These results stress the impact of depression on diabetic patients' use of health care resources.

Pharmacists practising in family medicine groups: An evaluation 2 years after experiencing a virtual community of practice

Background:

In 2018, a virtual community of practice (CoP) for pharmacists working in family medicine groups (FMGs) in Quebec province was developed. The aim of this CoP—called Réseau Québécois des Pharmaciens GMF (RQP GMF)—was to foster best practices by supporting FMG pharmacists. This study assesses the processes and outcomes of this CoP 2 years after its creation.

Methods:

We performed a cross-sectional web-based study from March to May 2020. All FMG pharmacists who were registered as members of the RQP GMF (n = 326) were sent an invitation via a newsletter. The link to the questionnaire was also publicized in the CoP Facebook group. The questionnaire comprised a 38-item validated instrument assessing 8 dimensions of the CoP. A descriptive analysis was performed.

Results:

A total of 112 FMG pharmacists (34.4%) completed the questionnaire. Respondents agreed that the RQP GMF was a joint enterprise (mean score, 4.18/5), that members shared their knowledge (mean score, 3.94/5) and engaged mutually (mean score, 3.50/5) and that the RQP GMF provided support (mean score, 3.92/5) and capacity building (mean score, 4.01/5). In general, they were satisfied with the implementation process (mean score, 3.68/5) and with activities proposed (mean score, 3.79/5). A lower proportion of respondents agreed that their participation in the RQP GMF generated external impacts, which led to a smaller mean score (3.37/5) for this dimension.

Conclusion:

The RQP GMF, one of the first communities of practice for pharmacists practising in family medicine groups, attained most of the objectives initially intended by the CoP. These results will facilitate the adaptation of processes and activities to better fulfil members’ needs. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.

Swallowing the pill of adverse effects: A qualitative study of patients' and pharmacists' experiences and decision-making regarding the adverse effects of chronic pain medications

Introduction

Pharmacological treatments of chronic pain can lead to numerous and sometimes serious adverse effects. Drawing on a social science approach to chronic illness, this study aimed to understand the experiences of people living with chronic pain and community pharmacists regarding the definition, prevention and management of analgesic adverse effects.

Methods

This qualitative study proceeded through 12 online focus groups (FGs) with people living with chronic pain (n = 26) and community pharmacists (n = 19), conducted between July 2020 and February 2021 in the province of Quebec, Canada. The semistructured discussion guides covered participants' definitions of adverse effects and decision‐making regarding their prevention and management. Discussions were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using grounded theory.

Results

Both people with chronic pain and pharmacists provided varying definitions of analgesic adverse effects depending on patients' social and clinical characteristics. Present quality of life and serious long‐term risks related to treatment were described as key dimensions influencing adverse effect appraisal. Dilemmas and discrepancies occurred between patients and pharmacists when choosing to prioritize pain relief or adverse effect prevention. Some patients lacked information about their medications and wanted to be more involved in decisions, while many pharmacists were concerned by patients' self‐management of adverse effects. Preventing opioid‐related overdoses often led pharmacists to policing practices. Despite most pharmacists wishing they could have a key role in the management of pain and adverse effects face organizational and financial barriers.

Conclusion

Defining, preventing and managing adverse effects in the treatment of chronic pain requires a person‐centred approach and shared decision‐making. Clinical training improvements and healthcare organization changes are needed to support pharmacists in providing patients with community‐based follow‐up and reliable information about the adverse effects of chronic pain treatments.

Patient or Public Contribution

A person with lived experience of chronic pain was involved as a coinvestigator in the study. He contributed to shaping the study design and objectives, including major methodological decisions such as the choice of pharmacists as the most appropriate professionals to investigate. In addition, 26 individuals with chronic pain shared their experiences extensively during the FGs.

Chronic pain patients' willingness to share personal identifiers on the web for the linkage of medico-administrative claims and patient-reported data: The chronic pain treatment cohort

PURPOSE

The linkage between patient-reported data and medico-administrative claims is of great interest for epidemiologic research. The goal of this study was to assess the willingness of people living with chronic pain to share personal identifiers on the web for the linkage of medico-administrative and patient-reported data.

METHODS

This methodological investigation was achieved in the context of the implementation of the chronic pain treatment (COPE) cohort. A web-based recruitment initiative targeting adults living with chronic pain was conducted in the province of Quebec (Canada).

RESULTS

A total of 1935 participants completed the questionnaire (mean age: 49.86 ± 13.27; females: 83.69%), 921 (47.60%) of which agreed to data linkage and shared their personal identifiers (name, date of birth, health insurance number online). The most common reasons for refusal were: (1) concerns regarding data security/privacy (25.71%) and (2) the belief that the requested data were too personal/intrusive (13.52%). Some participants did not understand the relevance of data linkage (11.81%). Participants from the COPE cohort and those from the subsample who agreed to data linkage were comparable to other random samples of chronic pain individuals in terms of age and pain characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Although approximately half of the participants refused data linkage, our approach allowed for the implementation of a data platform that contains a diverse and substantial sample. This investigation has also led to the formulation of recommendations for web-based data linkage, including placing items designed to assess willingness to share personal identifiers at the end of the questionnaire, adding explanatory videos, and using a mixed-mode questionnaire.

Experience and perspectives of users and non-users of the Ask your pharmacist teleconsultation platform

Background

There is a growing trend concerning the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for seeking health-related information such as information on medications and side effects. However, people looking online for health information cannot always judge the credibility of the information.

Objective(s)

This study aimed to describe patients' and pharmacists' experience using an asynchronous teleconsultation platform entitled “Ask Your Pharmacist” (AYP) and gather their perspectives and those of various healthcare and social services professionals providing primary care.

Methods

We performed semi-structured individual interviews over the telephone with patients having used the platform, pharmacists providing teleconsultation services on the platform, and various professionals delivering healthcare and psychosocial services to ambulatory patients. The questions explored specific themes, such as the perceived utility and impacts of the platform. We transcribed the interviews and performed a content analysis.

Results

We interviewed eight patients, six AYP pharmacists, and 15 healthcare and social services professionals. Participants perceived that the platform was simple to use and accessible. They also perceived that AYP promoted the visibility and the value of pharmacists' services. Some constraints were also shared, notably regarding questions requiring immediate attention or about complex situations.

Conclusions

The experience and perspectives of users and non-users of the AYP platform are mostly positive, but concerns were also raised regarding patients' safety. Results suggest that AYP could be a complementary tool to offer to ambulatory patients for simple, general and non-urgent problems.

User experience with the Ask Your Pharmacist teleconsultation platform

Background:

An increasing number of pharmacists use technology and social media to connect with patients. However, such means may pose confidentiality issues and legal problems. To correct this situation, a platform of teleconsultation services provided by pharmacists, titled “Ask Your Pharmacist,” was created in Quebec, Canada.

Methods:

A web-based satisfaction survey was carried out among patients and pharmacists who have used the Ask Your Pharmacist platform to describe their experience and satisfaction with the platform and explore the perceived usefulness of this service in the province of Quebec.

Results:

A total of 53 patients and 27 pharmacists completed the survey. Most patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their experience with Ask Your Pharmacist (96.2%), said that it met their need (88.7%), and agreed they would not have to consult again about the matter discussed with the pharmacist (75.5%). The main motivation of pharmacists for volunteering on Ask Your Pharmacist was to meet the needs of patients (85.1%), promote their profession (55.6%), improve drug utilization in the population (55.6%) and increase accessibility to a pharmacist (51.9%). Most (81.5%) felt that providing written consultation (rather than oral) required more research on their part.

Discussion:

Most patients judged they would not have to have another consultation about the matter discussed with the pharmacist, suggesting that Ask Your Pharmacist may avoid the need for physician and emergency department visits.

Conclusion:

Most patients and pharmacists were satisfied with their experience with Ask Your Pharmacist and perceived this service as useful. Further studies should assess the impact of this platform on the utilization of other health care services. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.

Depression but not non-persistence to antidiabetic drugs is associated with mortality in type 2 diabetes: A nested case-control study

AIMS

To measure the effect of depression on mortality of individuals newly treated with antidiabetic drugs, accounting for non-persistence to treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study within a cohort of newly treated individuals with diabetes. Using Quebec administrative data, we identified all-cause, diabetes-related, cardiovascular-related and major cardiovascular event deaths during a maximum follow-up of eight years. Each case was matched with up to 10 controls by age, sex, follow-up, and comorbidity index. We used conditional logistic regressions to estimate the effect of depression on mortality, adjusting for non-persistence to antidiabetic drug treatment, and other variables.

RESULTS

We retrieved 13,558 deaths, of which 3,652 were related to cardiovascular diseases, 2,112 to major cardiovascular events, and 311 to diabetes. Depression was associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular-related deaths, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 1.32 (95% CI: 1.21-1.45) to 1.72 (95% CI: 1.57-1.88) depending on the model, but not with diabetes-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Depression is independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes, even when adjusting for non-persistence to antidiabetic drug treatment. Identifying risk factors for depression and implementing a screening and proper treatment for depression may help reducing mortality.

Development of an electronic tool (e-AdPharm) to address unmet needs and barriers of community pharmacists to provide medication adherence support to patients

BACKGROUND

Community pharmacists are best placed to improve medication adherence because they frequently interact with patients and have been trained to manage medication-related problems. Therefore, it is essential to equip pharmacists adequately to detect non-adherent patients quickly and intervene to improve medication adherence.

OBJECTIVE

To design e-AdPharm, a tool that addresses unmet needs and barriers of community pharmacists to provide medication adherence support to patients with chronic diseases.

METHODS

A qualitative study using 4 focus group discussions with community pharmacists was conducted with a semi-structured interview guide and discussions lasting for 1-2 h. The discussions covered the barriers and needs of pharmacists related to medication adherence support provided to patients, their expectations of an electronic tool based on prescription refills to help them provide this support, and the design of the tool. Focus group data were coded and analyzed using an iterative process, with thematic and descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-six community pharmacists participated. Lack of time and motivation from pharmacists and patients were common barriers to the provision of medication adherence support. Accordingly, community pharmacists wished to measure medication adherence quickly, provide easily interpretable data to patients on their medication use, and raise the patient's awareness of non-adherence. The pharmacists expressed their need to have an electronic tool to share medication adherence information with the treating physician. Regarding the design of e-AdPharm, the pharmacists wanted a table displaying medication adherence with a color code representing adherence level. They also stressed the importance of a structured section enabling them to continuously document the interventions made and the need for patient follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

e-AdPharm meet the needs and overcome the barriers of community pharmacists to provide medication adherence support to their patients. Future studies should examine the feasibility of implementing e-AdPharm in community pharmacies and test its efficacy for improving medication adherence.

Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Realist Synthesis

PURPOSE

Case management (CM) is a promising intervention for frequent users of health care services. Our research question was how and under what circumstances does CM in primary care work to improve outcomes among frequent users with chronic conditions?

METHODS

We conducted a realist synthesis, searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO (1996 to September 2017) for articles meeting the following criteria: (1) population: adult frequent users with chronic disease, (2) intervention: CM in a primary care setting with a postintervention evaluation, and (3) primary outcomes: integration of services, health care system use, cost, and patient outcome measures. Academic and gray literature were evaluated for relevance and robustness. Independent reviewers extracted data to identify context, mechanism, and outcome (CMO) configurations. Analysis of CMO configurations allowed for the modification of an initial program theory toward a refined program theory.

RESULTS

Of the 9,295 records retrieved, 21 peer-reviewed articles and an additional 89 documents were retained. We evaluated 19 CM interventions and identified 11 CMO configurations. The development of a trusting relationship fostering patient and clinician engagement in the CM intervention was recurrent in many CMO configurations.

CONCLUSION

Our refined program theory proposes that in the context of easy access to an experienced and trusted case manager who provides comprehensive care while maintaining positive interactions with patients, the development of this relationship fosters the engagement of both individuals and yields positive outcomes when the following mechanisms are triggered: patients and clinicians feel supported, respected, accepted, engaged, and committed; and patients feel less anxious, more secure, and empowered to self-manage.

Public Health Outcomes May Differ After Switching from Brand-Name to Generic Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

Background

It is unclear whether generics are as safe as brand-name drugs in cardiology. For public health surveillance purposes, we evaluated if switching from the brand-name losartan, valsartan, or candesartan impacted the occurrence of the following outcomes: emergency room (ER) consultations, hospitalizations, or death.

Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

This study was conducted in the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, including healthcare administrative data of the population of Quebec, Canada. We included brand-name users of losartan, valsartan, or candesartan aged ≥ 66 years who had undergone ≥ 30 days of stable treatment on the brand-name drug prior to cohort entry (substitution time-distribution matching was used to prevent immortal time bias). Outcomes up to 1 year were compared between groups using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models (validity assumptions were verified).

Results

In our cohorts (losartan, n =15,783; valsartan, n =16,907; candesartan, n =26,178), mean age was 76–78 years, 59–66% were female, 90–92% had hypertension, and 13–15% had heart failure. Validity assumptions were violated for losartan only. For patients switched to generic valsartan, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.07 (0.99–1.14) for ER consultation, 1.26 (1.14–1.39) for hospitalization, and 1.01 (0.61–1.67) for death. The corresponding rates for candesartan were 1.00 (0.95–1.05), 0.96 (0.89–1.03), and 0.57 (0.37–0.88), respectively.

Conclusions

We observed an increased risk of hospitalizations for patients switched to generic valsartan, and a decreased risk of death for patients switched to generic candesartan, compared with those who continued taking the brand-name drug. The differences between generic and brand-name drugs may lead to some differences in public health outcomes, but this safety signal must be further studied using other cohorts and settings.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40268-020-00307-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Monitoring and managing medication adherence in community pharmacies in Quebec, Canada

Background

Community pharmacists have direct access to prescription refill information and regularly interact with their patients. Therefore, they are in a unique position to promote optimal medication use.

Objectives

To describe how community pharmacists in Quebec, Canada, identify nonadherent patients, monitor medication use and promote optimal medication adherence.

Methods

An invitation to complete a web-based survey was published online through different platforms, including a Facebook pharmacists' group, an electronic newsletter, a pharmacy network forum and e-mail. The survey included questions on participant characteristics, methods used by pharmacists to identify nonadherent patients and monitor medication use and interventions they used to promote medication adherence.

Results

In total, 342 community pharmacists completed the survey. The participants were mainly women (71.6%), staff pharmacists (56.7%) and aged 30 to 39 years (34.2%). The most common method to identify nonadherent patients was to check gaps between prescription refills (98.8%). The most common intervention to promote adherence was patient counselling (82.5%). The most common barriers to identifying nonadherent patients were lack of time (73.1%) and lack of prescription information (65.8%), whereas the most common barriers to intervening were anticipation of a negative reaction from their patients (91.2%) and lack of time (64%).

Conclusion

Lack of time and lack of prescription information are frequent challenges encountered by community pharmacists regarding effective monitoring and management of patients with poor medication adherence. Pharmacists could benefit from electronic tools based on prescription refills that would provide quick and easily interpretable information on their patients' medication adherence. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020;153:xx-xx.

French-Canadian translation of a self-report questionnaire to monitor opioid therapy for chronic pain: The Opioid Compliance Checklist (OCC-FC)

Context: Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is a frequent condition among Canadians. The psychosocial and economic costs of CNCP for individuals, their families, and society are substantial. Though opioid therapy is often used to manage CNCP, it is also associated with risks of misuse. The Opioid Compliance Checklist (OCC) was developed to monitor opioid misuse in patients taking opioids for CNCP. The objective of the present study was to provide a French-Canadian translation of the eight-item OCC, the OCC-FC. Methods: The eight-item OCC was translated for use in Québec using published guidelines for the translation and adaptation of self-report measures, including an expert committee and a double forward-backward translation process. A pretest of the adapted eight-item OCC was also conducted among 30 patients with CNCP. Results: A French-Canadian version of the OCC was generated. When ambiguity in the items was detected during expert committee consultation or pretest administration, modifications made were kept to a strict minimum to facilitate future comparisons across studies using the original English and translated French-Canadian version. Discussion: This study provides a culturally adapted tool that will contribute to identifying French-Canadian patients with CNCP who misuse opioids over the course of opioid therapy. This translation of the OCC has the strong potential to be useful in research and clinical settings.

Exposure to guideline-recommended drugs after a first acute myocardial infarction in older adults: does deprivation matter?

BACKGROUND

Inequities between guideline-recommended drugs (GRD) exposure and socioeconomic status might exist. The objective was to assess the association between a material and a social deprivation index and GRD exposure following a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in older adults in the province of Quebec.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System. Elderly ≥66 years, hospitalized for a first AMI between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2011 and covered by the public drug plan were identified. Exposure to GRD (i.e. simultaneous use of 1) antiplatelet, 2) beta-blocker, 3) lipid-lowering and 4) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker drugs) was assessed 30 and 365 days following hospital discharge. Associations between deprivation index and GRD exposure were estimated with log-binomial regressions adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Exposure to GRD was 52.2% and 48.0%, 30 and 365 days after hospital discharge, respectively. No statistically significant association was observed in multivariate analysis for both time points. Thirty days post hospital discharge, adjusted prevalence ratio of non-exposure to GRD was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.02) for most materially deprived vs. least deprived and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.99-1.08) for most socially deprived vs. least deprived. Similar results were observed for 365 days.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to GRD after a first urgent AMI among older adults insured by the public drug plan in the province of Quebec is relatively low. Reasons and risk groups for this low exposure should be studied to improve secondary prevention. However, results suggest equitable access to GRD, regardless of deprivation.

Impact of pharmacists' interventions on the pharmacotherapy of patients with complex needs monitored in multidisciplinary primary care teams

OBJECTIVES

Recently, pharmacists have joined multidisciplinary healthcare teams within family medicine groups (FMG) in Quebec Province, Canada. This study assessed the impact of their interventions on the pharmacotherapy of patients with complex needs monitored in FMGs.

METHODS

We performed a pre/post real-life intervention study among patients with complex needs referred to the FMG pharmacist in four FMGs in Quebec City. Pharmacists collected data at baseline, during follow-up and up to 6 months after the first encounter. They recorded all drug-related problems (DRPs) identified, interventions made and recommendations that were accepted by physicians. The researchers used the data collected to compare the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) and medication adherence (using the proportion of days covered (PDC)) before and after the pharmacist's interventions. Descriptive statistics and paired sample t-tests were computed.

KEY FINDINGS

Sixty-four patients (median age: 74.5 years) were included; four patients were lost to follow-up. Pharmacists detected 300 DRPs (mean: 7.2 per patient) during the study period for which they made an intervention. The most common DRP was 'drug use without indication' (27%). The physicians accepted 263 (87.7%) of those interventions. The mean number of prescribed drugs per patient decreased from 13.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.24 to 15.29) to 12.4 (95% CI: 10.92 to 13.90). The mean MRCI decreased from 47.18 to 41.74 (-5.44; 95% CI: 1.71 to 9.17), while the mean PDC increased from 84.4% to 90.0% (+5.6%; 95% CI: 2.7% to 8.4%).

CONCLUSION

Family medicine groups pharmacists can detect and resolve DRPs and can reduce medication regimen complexity and non-adherence to treatment in patients with complex needs monitored in FMGs.

Trends in Hospital Visits for Generic and Brand-Name Warfarin Users in Québec, Canada: A Population-Based Time Series Analysis

BACKGROUND

Federal standards authorize the commercialization of generic medicines after bioequivalence versus the brand-name originator has been demonstrated. For drugs with narrow therapeutic indexes, such as warfarin, the accepted difference in bioavailability is ≤ 10%. No systematic pharmacovigilance studies are conducted once generics become available.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the impact of the arrival of generic warfarin on hospital visit trends (hospital admissions or emergency room consultations) in warfarin users.

METHODS

This was an observational interrupted time series analysis (2 January 1996 to 1 January 2016). Using the Québec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we included all patients who were aged ≥ 66 years, publicly covered and using brand-name or generic warfarin (N = 280,158). We estimated rates of hospital visits in 6-month periods, 5 years before and up to 15 years after the arrival of generic warfarin. Periods before and after were compared using segmented regression models for all users along with exploratory (generic vs. brand name)/subgroup analyses (cardiovascular comorbidities and socioeconomic status).

RESULTS

Generic warfarin arrived on the market on 2 January 2001. Over the 20-year period of the study, the mean rate of hospital visits was 113 for 100 brand-name or generic users per 6-month period and was similar before and after the arrival of the generics. Up to 15 years after the arrival of the generics, the rates of hospital visits were 10% higher for generic than for brand-name users, which was confirmed by subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we observed no impact on hospital visits after the arrival of generic warfarin in all the population treated with any type of warfarin. However, a higher crude rate of hospital visits among generic users than brand-name users remains to be validated using a different methodology and specific outcomes.

Did Generic Clopidogrel Commercialization Affect Trends of ER Consultations and Hospitalizations in the Population Treated with Clopidogrel?

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel has been widely used to prevent atherothrombotic events. Since 2011, pharmacists have offered their patients the opportunity to switch to generic clopidogrel, an economic alternative. Whether bioequivalence of generic cardiovascular drugs translates into clinical equivalence at a population level remains unclear and needs to be further documented.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the impact of generic clopidogrel commercialization on adverse events (AEs): hospitalizations or emergency room (ER) consultations.

METHODS

This is an interrupted time series analysis using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System. We included all patients ≥ 66 years old who were users of the brand-name clopidogrel or a generic version (n = 6) 24 months before and up to 12 months after generics commercialization. Rates of AEs were computed, and periods before and after generics commercialization were analyzed by segmented regression models along with exploratory analyses (generic vs. brand name). Sensitivity analyses were also performed using stratification of the time series by (1) sex, (2) the number of prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities, and (3) socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Time series were constituted of 89,525 clopidogrel users (mean age 78 years, 45% women, 71% ischemic heart disease, 34% stroke). For all users, there was a mean rate of 157 AEs per 1000 user-months, stable trend before (-0.1% [95% confidence interval -0.3 to 0.1] and after (0.0% [- 0.5 to 0.6]) generics commercialization. In exploratory analyses, once generic clopidogrel versions were commercialized, rates of AEs were 19.2% (95% CI 11.7-26.7) higher for generic versus brand-name users. This difference persisted up to 1 year. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

The population treated with clopidogrel had similar rates of hospitalizations or ER consultations before and after generics commercialization. However, differences in rates of hospitalizations or ER consultations between generic and brand-name clopidogrel users may represent a drug safety signal which remains to be validated. Using a different study design, permitting adjustment for potential confounders, could be useful in this regard.

Exploring the role of teams and technology in patients' medication decision making

OBJECTIVES

We know little about how electronic health records (EHRs) should be designed to help patients, pharmacists, and physicians participate in interprofessional shared decision making. We used a qualitative approach to understand better how patients make decisions with their health care team, how this information influences decision making about their medications, and finally, how this process can be improved through the use of EHRs.

DESIGN

Participants from 4 regions across Canada took part in a semistructured interview and completed a brief demographic survey. The interview transcripts were thematically analyzed by means of the multidisciplinary framework method.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Thirty participants, 18 years of age and older with at least one chronic illness, were recruited from across Canada. We interviewed participants in their homes, at the school of pharmacy, or another location of their choosing.

RESULTS

We identified 4 main themes: (1) complexity of patient decision making: who, where, what, when, why; (2) relationships with physicians and pharmacists: who do I trust for what?; (3) accessing health information for decision making: how much and from where?; and (4) patients' methods of managing information for health decision making. Across the themes, participants appreciated expert advice from professionals and wanted to be informed about all options, despite concerns about limited knowledge. EHRs were perceived as a potential solution to many of the barriers identified.

CONCLUSION

Patients make decisions with their health care providers as well as with family and friends. The pharmacist and physicians play different roles in helping patients in making decisions. We found that making EHRs accessible not only to health care providers but also to patients can provide a cohesive and clear context for making medication-related decisions. EHRs may facilitate clear communication, foster interprofessional understanding, and improve patient access to their health information. Future research should examine how to develop EHRs that are adaptive to user needs and desires.

Case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs: an implementation and realist evaluation protocol

INTRODUCTION

Significant evidence in the literature supports case management (CM) as an effective intervention to improve care for patients with complex healthcare needs. However, there is still little evidence about the facilitators and barriers to CM implementation in primary care setting. The three specific objectives of this study are to: (1) identify the facilitators and barriers of CM implementation in primary care clinics across Canada; (2) explain and understand the relationships between the actors, contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes of the CM intervention; (3) identify the next steps towards CM spread in primary care across Canada.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a multiple-case embedded mixed methods study. CM will be implemented in 10 primary care clinics in five Canadian provinces. Three different units of analysis will be embedded to obtain an in-depth understanding of each case: the healthcare system (macro level), the CM intervention in the clinics (meso level) and the individual/patient (micro level). For each objective, the following strategy will be performed: (1) an implementation analysis, (2) a realist evaluation and (3) consensus building among stakeholders using the Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts method.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study, which received ethics approval, will provide innovative knowledge about facilitators and barriers to implementation of CM in different primary care jurisdictions and will explain how and why different mechanisms operate in different contexts to generate different outcomes among frequent users. Consensual and prioritised statements about next steps for spread of CM in primary care from the perspectives of all stakeholders will be provided. Our results will offer context-sensitive explanations that can better inform local practices and policies and contribute to improve the health of patients with complex healthcare needs who frequently use healthcare services. Ultimately, this will increase the performance of healthcare systems and specifically mitigate ineffective use and costs.

Measuring adherence to oral antidiabetic multi-drug treatment: Comparative validity of prescription claims-based adherence measures against hospitalization

BACKGROUND

The use of prescription claims data to measure adherence to diabetes treatment is very common in research. However, there is no clear evidence regarding the accuracy of the methods used to assess adherence to multi-drug treatments for the many patients using multiple antidiabetic drugs.

PURPOSE

To assess the validity of prescription claims-based adherence measures in the context of multiple oral antidiabetic drug treatment.

METHODS

A cohort of patients who began their antidiabetic drug treatment with at least two oral antidiabetic drugs (new users) was created using Quebec medico-administrative data. Four different prescription claims-based adherence measures were assessed: proportion of days covered (PDC) by at least one class of drugs, mean PDC, PDC by all classes and daily polypharmacy possession ratio (DPPR). All-cause and diabetes-related hospitalizations were the validation criteria. To assess the validity of the measures, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for each measure and each criterion.

RESULTS

A total of 5982 individuals were included. The areas under the ROC curves for the PDC by at least one class of drugs, the mean PDC, the PDC by all classes of drugs and the DPPR were respectively 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52-0.56), 0.51 (0.49-0.53), 0.50 (0.48-0.52) and 0.51 (0.49-0.53) with all-cause hospitalization as criterion and 0.55 (0.53-0.57), 0.53 (0.51-0.55), 0.51 (0.49-0.53) and 0.53 (0.51-0.55) using diabetes-related hospitalization as criterion.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that all measures have poor validity in predicting hospitalizations thus raising concerns about their utility in the assessment of adherence to multi-drug treatment. Future research should assess the capacity of these measures to predict other outcomes more closely related to medication adherence.