Liability of clinical oncologists and the COVID-19 emergency: Between hopes and concerns

•

To contain COVID-19 spread, Italy is under a global lockdown except for health services and food supply.

•

In this scenario, growing apprehension concerning legal consequences is rising among health professionals.

•

Hospitals and health professionals are highly exposed to liability.

•

More articulated legal regulations are strongly needed.

To contain COVID-19 spread, Italy is under a global lockdown since February 21, 2020, except for health services and food supply. In this scenario, growing apprehension concerning legal consequences is rising among health professionals due to several ethical and legal questions. Even if medical ethicists may approve patients’ prioritization protocols, hospitals and health professionals remain highly exposed to liability. The so-called smart-working may be very useful, but it may harbor potential legal harms for health personnel and patients and safety. Moreover, personal umbrella policies also often exclude liability arising out of the transmission of a communicable disease, especially a pandemic state, is declared. Under the pressure of medical associations, Italian Government political forces have very recently presented an amendment to the recently released ordinances for the COVID-19 emergency aimed to reduce medical liability. Presumably, similar epidemics or other wide-scale similar events may happen again in an unpredictable future. Therefore, more articulated legal regulations are strongly needed starting from lessons learned from this epidemic.

Reorganisation of medical oncology departments during the novel coronavirus disease-19 pandemic: a nationwide Italian survey

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic is a global health problem, which started to affect China by the end of 2019. In Europe, Italy has faced this novel disease entity (named novel coronavirus disease [COVID-19]) first and severely. COVID-19 represents a significant hurdle for public health services and a potential harm for patients with cancer. The Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici (CIPOMO) is an Italian association of head physicians in oncology departments, which promotes working and research activities in oncology on a national basis. In the midst of the epidemic in Italy, the CIPOMO promoted a national survey aiming to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on clinical activity of oncologists and the implementation of containment measures of COVID-19 diffusion. Overall, 122 head physicians participated in this survey, with a homogeneous distribution on the national territory. Results show that the following measures for oncologic patients have been promptly implemented through the whole country: use of protective devices, triage of patients accessing the hospital, delay of non-urgent visits and use of telemedicine. Results of this survey suggest that Italian oncology departments have promptly set a proactive approach to the actual emergency. Oncologists need to preserve the continuum of care of patients, as the benefit of ensuring a well-delivered anti-cancer treatment plan outweighs the risk of COVID-19 infection. International cooperation is an important starting point, as heavily affected nations can serve as an example to find out ways to safely preserve health activity during the pandemic.

Reactions and countermeasures of medical oncologists towards the incoming COVID-19 pandemic: a WhatsApp messenger-based report from the Italian College of Chief Medical Oncologists

Background

This descriptive, unplanned investigation has been undertaken to report reactions, attitudes and countermeasures which have been put in place and implemented by medical oncology units facing the COVID-19 outbreak in Southern Italy.

Materials and methods

Data have been retrospectively obtained from the time-related analysis of conversations via a WhatsApp messenger-based group chat between the medical directors belonging to the Italian College of Medical Oncology Directors. Overall number, intensity and time trend of conversations related to reactions during the 4 weeks of observation related to the crucial events which occurred between 24 February and 28 March, 2020 2020 are included. A sentiment analysis of conversations was also carried out.

Results

We report 956 conversations among 19 medical oncology units related to reactions to the crucial events, such as epidemic spread, Government ordinances and guidelines during the 4 weeks of observation. Data show significant awareness of problems linked to the COVID-19 spread among oncologists and rapid diffusion of countermeasures. Actions taken were correlated time wise to crucial events. A correlation between conversations and the volume of activity of oncology units was found. By analysing the sentiment analysis of raw data, positive emotions were reduced in percentage over the weeks. A significant increase in negative emotions was observed as the outbreak impacted on the healthcare system.

Conclusion

In our experience, the WhatsApp instant-messaging system seems to be a useful tool to share news and reactions between medical oncologists to rapidly implement necessary health measures and answers to most cancer patients' needs and queries in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario.

Nivolumab in metastatic melanoma: good efficacy and tolerability in elderly patients

Background

Nivolumab is an anti-PD-1 antibody that restores the antitumour immune function of T cells, blocking the binding of PD-1 with its ligand PD-L1. PD-1 is expressed on T cells and interacts with PD-L1 on tumour cells. The PD-1-PD-L1 link inhibits T cell activation. In metastatic melanoma, PD-1-PD-L1 binding plays a critical role, and the advent of the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab has delivered new and effective treatment options with proven clinical benefit. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab in elderly patients with metastatic melanoma.

Methods

The study enrolled 55 elderly patients (75 years of age and older) with a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma. Primary endpoints of the study were progression-free survival (pfs) and the objective response rate; secondary endpoints were overall survival, reduction in serum lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) from before to after treatment, and tolerability.

Results

Nivolumab was well tolerated and resulted in good disease control, with a manageable toxicity profile and significant clinical benefit. The duration of pfs was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval: 3.5 months to 6.8 months). A significant correlation was observed between reduction in serum ldh and pfs: 0.60 (95% confidence interval: 0.28 to 0.86; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Nivolumab is an immunotherapy treatment that has proved to be an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option in elderly patients with metastatic melanoma.

Is There Still a Role for Endocrine Therapy Alone in HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Patients? Results from the Analysis of Two Data Sets of Patients Treated with High-Dose Fulvestrant as First-Line Therapy in the Real-World Setting: The EVA and GIM-13 AMBRA Studies

Background

Different studies suggest that fulvestrant 500 mg every 28 days (HD-FUL) could be an active treatment in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients even treated with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. The aim of this analysis is to describe the outcome of ABC patients treated with HD-FUL as first-line treatment in terms of median duration of treatment and the overall response rate in a real-world setting.

Methods

For the purpose of the present analysis, we considered two data sets of HR+ ABC patients collected in Italy between 2012 and 2015 (EVA and GIM-13 AMBRA studies).

Results

Eighty-one and 91 patients have been identified from the two data sets. The median age was 63 years (range 35-82) for the EVA and 57.8 years (range 35.0-82.3) for the AMBRA patients. ORRs were 23.5 and 24.3% in the whole population, 26.9% in the patients with bone only, and 21.8 and 21.4% in those with visceral metastases. The median duration of HD-FUL was 11.6 months (range 1-48) and 12.4 months (range 2.9-70.0) in the two data sets, respectively.

Conclusion

These data suggest that HD-FUL should still continue to play a significant role as first-line therapy in HR+ ABC patients.

Abstract P2-15-14: Triple negative (TNBC) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts): Is chemotherapy (CHT) choice influenced by adjuvant (adj) treatments? Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study

Background: TNBC shows a very bad prognosis: median time to relapse is 18 months and median overall survival (OS) is less than 24 months.

Methods: AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, describing the choice of 1st- and subsequent treatments in HER2-ve MBC pts in the years 2012-2015. The present analysis is focused on TNBC pts (127 out of 879 evaluable; 14.4%) and CHT strategies, overall and according to adj treatment. Kaplan Meyer probability of survival from primary (DFS), 1st(PFS1) and 2nd(PFS2) progression and Time from last CHT and death were calculated for the whole population and according the main adj regimens.

Results: Median age at primary diagnosis was 53 years. The most used regimens in the adj setting were anthra/taxane(tax) 50.7%, anthra 22.1% or others (CMF included) 20.6%. Median time to events was: DFS 23.2, PFS1 6.5 and PFS2 4.3 months, respectively.

CHT choices in the metastatic setting according to adj treatment were:

Adj Anthra-basedAdj Taxane-basedAdj other1st-lineTax* 57.6% - VRL/CAPE 18.2% - Plat 15.2% Other 3% - None 6.1%Tax* 46.2% - VRL/CAPE 24.6% Plat 24.6% - Other 4.6%Tax*52% - VRL/CAPE 16% - Anthra 16% - Anthra/Tax 8%2nd-lineTax**18.2% - Anthra 13.6% - VRL/CAPE 22.7% - Plat 27.3% - Erib 9.1% - Other 9.1%Tax**22% - VRL/CAPE 22% Plat 22% - Erib 14.6% - Other 17.1%VRL/CAPE 38.5% - Anthra 23.1% - Tax**23.1% - Plat 15.4%3rd lineVRL/CAPE 37.5% - Erib 25% - Anthra 18.8% - Tax***12.5% - Plat 6.3%Erib 26.9% - VRL/CAPE 23.1% - Plat 15.4% - Anthra 11.5% - Tax***11.5% - Other 11.5%VRL/CAPE 42.9% - Erib 28.6% - Plat 14.3% - Other 14.3%*docetaxel 8.4%, nab-paclitaxel 7%, paclitaxel 59%**docetaxel 7%, nab-paclitaxel 71.4%, paclitaxel 21%***docetaxel 20%, nab-paclitaxel 80%At a median follow up of 3.3 years 50% of pts are still alive.

OS rates at 5 and 8 years from primary are 50% and 40%. OS rates from 1st progression are 50% and 20% at 22 and 40 months. Median OS (months) according to 1st line regimen was similar (ns) across the regimens (paclitaxel+bevacizumab: 17.8; Platinum-based: 14.1; CAPE/VRL: 16.3). Median time from last CHT and death was 1.5 months (29.6%< 1 month; 14% < 2 weeks)

Conclusion: Our results show that taxanes play a crucial role in MBC even if used in 50% of Adj. CAPE/VRL, Platinum regimens and Eribuline are also widely used. Time from last CHT administration and Death is very short in 30% of cases

Citation Format: Giorgio Mustacchi, Alessandra Beano, Alessandra Fabi, Lorenzo Livi, Antonio Bernardo, Ferdinando Riccardi, Paolo Marchetti, Ornella Garrone, Lucrezia Diodati, Laura Biganzoli, Monica Giordano, Anna Turletti, Livio Blasi, Andrea Milani, Clara Natoli, Marta Riemma, Alessia D'Alonzo, Grazia Arpino, Paolo Pronzato, Marina E Cazzaniga, on behalf of GIM-13 AMBRA Study Group. Triple negative (TNBC) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts): Is chemotherapy (CHT) choice influenced by adjuvant (adj) treatments? Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-15-14.

Eribulin mesylate use as third-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (VESPRY): a prospective, multicentre, observational study

Background

In real-world practice, eribulin mesylate provides significant survival benefit, with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

In this prospective, open-label, multicentre, observational study we evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of eribulin as third-line treatment in a homogeneous population. The primary endpoints were the safety profile and response in metastatic sites; secondary endpoints included the response in different subtypes, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

From 2013 to 2016, 118 women were treated in 21 Sicilian institutions; the median age was 58 years (range 29-79), with 69% of patients under 65. The median cycles of eribulin were 5.5 (range 1-26). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (9.3%, 3 cases of grade 3, 4 of grade 4); only 1 case of QT prolongation was reported. Eribulin was effective in controlling metastatic disease in all sites, and it achieved the highest ORR in brain (16%) and liver (14.9%). Median OS was 31.8 months (95% CI 27.9-34.4) and median PFS 5.5 months (95% CI 4.2-6.6). PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI 2.8-8.4) in patients with triple-negative subtype. Median PFS was longer in patients over 65 years (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.4-8.3). In patients who had visceral metastases PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 95% 3.5-6.6) and OS 33.9 months (95% CI 29.8-40.8).

Conclusions

Eribulin as third-line treatment shows an acceptable safety profile and a substantial antitumour activity in the treatment of MBC, even in elderly patients and in those with visceral disease.

A Case Report of Adult Pineoblastoma Occurring in a Pregnant Woman

BACKGROUND/AIM

Pineoblastoma of the adult age is an uncommon tumor with only 200 cases reported. A standardized approach for an optimal adjuvant strategy is currently lacking. The case presented herein also deals with the issue of central nervous system tumors in pregnancy.

CASE REPORT

A 21-year-old pregnant woman presented with massive hydrocephalus due to a mass in the pineal region detected with MRI. After positioning an urgent ventricular derivation, a cesarean section was performed. During a third ventriculocisternostomy, a biopsy revealed a pineoblastoma. After a maximal safe resection, postoperative craniospinal irradiation for a total dose of 36 Gy plus a sequential boost to the tumor bed to 54 Gy, and adjuvant chemotherapy with CDDP plus CCNU plus vincristine were performed. After one year, the patient is alive with no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

The use of adjuvant radio-chemotherapy provided excellent outcomes in our case. The advanced gestational age facilitated the choice of the therapeutic strategy.

Triple-negative (TNBC) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts): Is chemotherapy (CHT) choice influenced by adjuvant (adj) treatments? Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study

e12549

Background: TNBC shows a very bad prognosis: median time to relapse is 18 months and median overall survival (OS) is less than 24 months. Methods: AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, describing the choice of 1st- and subsequent treatments in HER2-ve MBC pts in the years 2012-2015. The present analysis is focused on TNBC pts (127 out of 879 evaluable; 14.4%) and CHT strategies, overall and according to adj treatment. Kaplan Meyer probability of survival from primary (DFS), 1st (PFS1) and 2nd (PFS2) progression and Time from last CHT and death were calculated for the whole population and according the main adj regimens. Results: Median age at primary diagnosis was 53 years. The most used regimens in the adj setting were anthra/taxane(tax) 50.7%, anthra 22.1% or others (CMF included) 20.6%). Median time to events was: DFS 23.2, PFS16.5 and PFS2 4.3 months, respectively. CHT choices in the metastatic setting according to adj treatment were: Conclusions: Our results show that taxanes play a crucial role in MBC even if used in 50% of Adj. CAPE/VRL, Platinum regimens and Eribuline are also widely used. Time from last CHT administration and Death is very short in 30% of cases[Table: see text]

Abstract P4-13-04: Not presented

This abstract was not presented at the conference.

Citation Format: Cazzaniga ME, Blasi L, Pronzato P, Giordano M, Garrone O, Donadio M, Del Mastro L, Livi L, Natoli C, Michelotti A, Turletti A, Riccardi F, De Laurentiis M, Marchetti P, Montemurro F, Romagnoli E, De Placido S, Biganzoli L, Bologna A, Bria E, Mustacchi G. Not presented [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-04.

Everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) in patients with advanced breast cancer aged ≥ 65 years: new lessons for clinical practice from the EVA study

BACKGROUND

The present analysis focuses on real-world data of Everolimus-Exemestane in advanced HR+ve, HER2-ve elderly breast cancer patients (aged 65 years) included in the EVA study, with unique findings in those aged 70 years.

METHODS

Data are collected from clinical records and analysed according to age cut-off (< 65 years; 65 - 69 years and {greater than or equal to} 70 years). Relationship of analyzed variables with response were tested by mean of a Mantel-Haenszel chi square test. Time to event analysis was described by Kaplan Meier approach and association with baseline characteristics was analysed by stratified log-rank test and proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled overall 404 pts. 154 patients out of 404 (38,1%) were aged {greater than or equal to} 65 years, of whom 87 were {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Median duration of EVE treatment was 28.5 weeks (95% CI 19.0 - 33.8) in patients aged 65-69 years and 24,4 weeks (95% CI 19,2 - 33,2) in those aged {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Fewer patients aged 65 years received the highest EVE Dose-Intensity (>7.5 mg/day) in comparison to younger patients (49,6% vs. 66,8%). Grade 3–4 toxicities occurred to 55 patients (35,7%), mainly stomatitis (10,9%), rash (5,8%) and non-infectious pneumonitis (NIP) (3,6%). Some toxicities, such as weight loss and anaemia were peculiarly observed in patients aged {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Five treatment-related deaths were collected (3,2%).

CONCLUSIONS

EVE-EXE combination remains one of the potential treatments in HR+ patients also for elderly ones.

Practical issues for the management of hyponatremia in oncology

Hyponatremia is common in cancer patients and has a negative impact on outcomes and survival. Both the diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia are challenging. Easy-to-use, practical guidelines are needed. The aim of this article is to discuss practical issues related to the diagnostic workup and management of hyponatremia, with particular attention to complex patients, such as those affected by neoplastic diseases. Admittedly, these patients may present several comorbidities, which may cause sodium alterations. In addition, multidrug therapy may precipitate serum sodium fall. An algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia was also developed, based on the discussion of the results of a questionnaire completed by the authors and of the published recommendations/guidelines on hyponatremia. The goal was to produce an algorithm that was as simple as possible but still comprehensive, without compromising information completeness. Many explanatory notes were added with the aim of guiding clinicians throughout the management of complex patients with hyponatremia, such as those with cancer. The resulting algorithm and supporting literature are presented.

Clinical efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Purpose

Pancreatic carcinoma is the neoplasia with the major mortality, and main standard treatments in this cancer increase survival but do not lead to complete recovery of the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Abraxane^® (nab-paclitaxel) in Italian patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 80 patients. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point for evaluating the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine treatment, while carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) reduction, safety, progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate and reduction in pain were secondary end points.

Results

The median OS was 8 months, and the median PFS was 5 months. A considerable difference in CA 19-9 before and after treatment was observed. Descriptive and correlation analyses were done to examine the relationship between CA 19-9 response and OS. Linear regression analysis between OS and CA 19-9 response revealed that CA 19-9 is an important predictor of OS, showing a positive correlation.

Conclusion

Nab-paclitaxel is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for patients affected by MPC. The drug showed an improved tolerability profile, significant pain relief and an increase in survival rate.

Abstract P1-14-04: Overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients in the third millennium: Results of an Italian study

BACKGROUND - Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a life-threatening disease. It is important to provide data about real-life MBC patients (pts) to understand the current prognostic factors. The aim of the present observational study, named COSMO (Checking Overall Survival in a MBC Observational study) is to describe the overall survival (OS) in a large cohort of MBC pts, assessing its correlation with specific prognostic factors (demographic, clinic, pathologic and biological).

PATIENTS AND METHODS - The COSMO study is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study, developed throughout the collaboration of 31 Italian oncological centers. Data about pts diagnosed as metastatic from 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2008, were collected. The association between molecular subtypes, metastatic sites, disease free interval (DFI) and OS were assessed. Pts were classified in three subgroups, based on the biological characteristics of their tumor: luminal, HER2-positive (regardless of hormone receptor) and triple negative (TN). Metastatic sites were categorized as visceral versus non-visceral disease, only bone and central nervous system (CNS) metastases. DFI was calculated from diagnosis to first relapse only for M0 pts.

RESULTS - Of 3931 MBC pts enrolled in the study, 3720 were evaluable, with a median age of 61 years (interquartile range, IQR, 51-71). 1804 (62,1%) pts had a luminal disease, 691 (23,8%) HER2-positive, 410 (14.1%) TN. Median DFI was 3.2 years (IQR 1.7- 6.0). Regarding metastatic sites, pts with visceral disease were 2332 (63%); 826 (22,2%) pts had bone isolated metastases; in 306 (8,3%) pts, CNS metastases were reported. With a median follow up of 9 years (IQR 5.7-11.0) and 3098 (83.3%) recorded events, we founded a median OS of 2.8 years (95%CI: 2.7-2.9) years. OS was strictly depending from molecular subtypes with a better prognosis for HER2-positive versus luminal and TN MBC pts, median OS of 3.1 (95%CI 2.8-3.4), 3.0 (95%CI: 2.9-3.1) and 1.5 (95%CI: 1.3-1.7) years respectively (p-value&lt;0.001). 525 (14,1%) pts received trastuzumab. Metastatic sites affect prognosis, with a better OS for bone disease (3.4 years, 95%CI: 3.1-3.6) versus visceral disease (2.2 years 95%CI: 2.0- 2.3). Brain metastasis correlate with the worst prognosis: OS of 1.5 years (95% CI: 0.8 – 1.7). Even DFI shows a correlation with prognosis: pts with DFI&gt;2 years show a median OS of 3 years (95% CI: 2.9 – 3.2), while those with DFI&lt;2 years have a median OS of 2.4 years (95% CI: 2.3-2.6); HR was 0.69 (95%CI: 0,62-0,76) for every five years of increase in DFI (p-value&lt;0.001).

CONCLUSIONS - Molecular subtype is crucial for prognosis: HER2-positive subtype has the best prognosis, while TN subtype has the shorter OS. Having a longer DFI from diagnosis (&gt;2 years) correlate with a better prognosis. Our study confirm that sites of metastasis affects outcome: visceral involvement correlates with poor prognosis and, particularly, pts with brain metastasis represent the worst subgroup, while pts with solely bone disease have the best prognosis. The COSMO study provides a view on the Italian landscape of MBC between 2000 and 2008, adding new insights about pts prognosis.

Citation Format: La Verde N, Collovà E, Blasi L, Pinotti G, Bernardo A, Bonotto M, Garrone O, Brunello A, Cavazzini MG, Bareggi C, Prochilo T, Porcu L, Moretti A, Barni S, On Behalf of COSMO Study Group. Overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients in the third millennium: Results of an Italian study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-04.

Predictive factors for 6 vs 12 cycles of Folfiri-Bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer

Early switching to de-intensified maintenance regimen is still a matter of debate in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

The MARTHA trial, a S.I.C.O.G. phase III randomized trial, compared FOLOFIRI+bevacizumab (B) for 12 cycles (6 months) followed by B for up to 12 months (FOLFIRI +B*12 arm) vs FOLFIRI+B for 6 cycles (3 months) followed by capecitabine+B for 4 cycles followed by B for up to 12 months (FOLFIRI+B*6 arm). Chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients were randomized, primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) as a secondary endpoint. A novel analysis, the Death Pace Analysis (DPA), was performed to identify patients who benefited from a specific treatment.

No PFS difference was seen in 198 enrolled patients (101 in FOLFIRI+B*12, 97 in FOLFIRI+B*6). A non-significant superior OS was observed for FOLFIRI+B*6 (HR 0.74, p 0.098). The DPA demonstrated that 14% of patients were identifiable as FOLFIRI+B*6-benefiting patients. According to a logistic regression analysis including 23 clinicopathological variables, baseline Hb was the only independent predictor of DPA-defined FOLFIRI+B*6-benefit status. Among patients with Hb ≤ 11.1 gr/dL a statistically significant prolonged OS was observed for FOLFIRI+B*6 over FOLFIRI+B*12 (median OS: 20.7 vs 12.6 months, respectively, HR 0.54, p 0.048). No survival difference was observed between arms in patients with Hb > 11.1.

mCRC patients with low baseline Hb levels are better treated with FOLFIRI+B*6 first-line strategy. Possible biological explanations for this finding are being investigated.